CLICK TO ADD TITLE
[DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
The 5th Global Health Supply Chain Summit
November 14 -16, 2012Kigali, Rwanda
The LMIS rEvolution in TanzaniaChris Wright
Presentation Overview
• Current state of LMIS data in Tanzania• Vision for electronic LMIS• State-of-the-Art ERP at Medical Stores Department
Data management in the recent past
Hospitals HC DSP
√ √ √
√ √ √
√ √ √
√ √
√ √ √
√ √ √
Health Facilities
ARVs & OI Drugs
Essential Meds/ILS
TB & Leprosy
Report & Requisition
EPI
Labsupplies
HIV tests
CentralMSD ERP
Shipments
Medical Stores Dept.
Orders
ZonalMSDERP
ZonalMSDERP
Zonal MSDERP
R&Rs or Orders
District Approval
R&R
R&R
R&R
ORDER
ORDER
Report
Tanzanian LMIS in 2011
5
LMIS data collected at the Health Facility
Malaria(ILS)3 items
Family plan (ILS)12 items
Essential med. (ILS)106 items
HospExtraSupp
ARVHIV test30 item
OI’sDrugs110 item
Lab200 item
TB77 item
EPI63 item
Opening balance
Received
Lost/adjusted
Closing balance
Max – Min stock
Consumption
Qty needed by HF (order)
Patient data
LMIS data collected at Health Facility and received by MOHSW & Programs
6
Malaria(ILS)3 item
Family plan (ILS)12 item
Essential med. (ILS)106 item
HospExtraSupp
ARVHIV test30 item
OI’sDrugs110 item
Lab200 item
TB77 item
EPI63 item
Opening balance
Received
Lost/adjusted
Closing balance
Max – Min stock
Consumption
Qty needed by HF (order)
Patient data
Impact of Poor Data Availability
Health Facility District Medical Stores Dept. MOHSW/Program
Redundant, burdensome reports
Inadequate funding Inadequate data for forecasting
Inadequate data for forecasting
Too little feedback Too little feedback Long lead times for procurement, order process
No visibility into supplies at facility level
Not enough staff No visibility into MSD stocks
Mismatch between demand and supply
No visibility into MSD stocks
Ineffective supervision
Inadequate data for supervision
Inadequate controls No visibility into system performance
Poor accountability at higher levels
Poor accountability Inadequate visibility into performance
Inadequate supply chain oversight
Vision for the Future: eLMIS in 2013
eLMIS Focus
MDS
SMSTextData
Fax/ScanOpticalCharacterRecognition
MSD ERPOrders and Shipments
MOHSW andPartnerAccess
ReportingDashboard
And KPIs
MobileRF
Scanner
TransportationInformation/GIS
eLMISLOGISTICS
DATA WAREHOUSE
Web Based Data Entry and Data Uploads
State-of-the-Art ERP at MSD:Improving Business Performance
Need for a New ERP: MSD Business Growth
~US$120 Million
Project Objectives
• Implement the new and sustainable ERP System which supports MSD’s strategic business requirements
• Re-engineer business processes according to industry best practices
• Implement/improve KPIs and processes for effective business management
• Deliver SOPs and other documentation required to support ISO9001 certification
• Improve organizational capability to support continuous improvement
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) in a nutshell
Plan
ning
Ope
ratio
nsA
dmin
istr
atio
nSUPPLY INVENTORY DEMAND
ADMINISTRATION
Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
Receiving
DRPMRP Demand Planning
Fulfillment
Inventory Control
Consigned Inventory
Management
ReplenishmentTransportation
Sales Order Management
Customer Service
Purchasing
Quality Assurance
Quality Control
PayrollHR
Budgeting
Management Reporting
General Ledger
Customer Management
Clearing
Forecasting
Asset Management
Vendor Management
Pricing
Cash Management
Tender and Contracting
Sales & Operational Planning
Warehouse Management
Selected ERP System: Epicor 9
Epicor 9 is a fully integrated Enterprise Resource Planning system capable of supporting the strategic business requirements of MSD.
Implementation Methodology
• Project CharterVisionSuccess MetricsScopeRisksGovernanceApproachWork PlanComm PlanChange Control
• Technology Architecture
• Hardware/Software Selection
• Infrastructure Setup• Contracts and Staffing• Change Management
Plan
• Foundation Training• Process Review• Define New Business
Processes• Gap Analysis• New Process SOPs
and Approval• User Requirements• Functional and
Technical Spec• Workflow Dev• Data Migration
Strategy• Reporting Strategy• Tech Strategy• Dev and Test
Environments• Documentation Plan
• Staging & Production Setup
• EPICOR Screen and Flow Construction
• System Configuration• CRP Schedules and
Scenarios • Test Plans and Cases• Data Migration
Development• Test Technical
Infrastructure• End User Training
Plan• CRP 1 Execution• CRP 2 Execution• Deployment Planning• Support Plan
• Fully Configured Environment
• User Acceptance Testing
• End User Training• Production Cutover
Plan• Go-live• End User Production
Support• Awareness Events• KPI Review
• Lessons Learned• Knowledge Transfer • Project Office
Closure
Prepare & Plan
Analyze &
Design
Construct & Test
Deploy Operate
Prepare & Plan Analyze Design Construct
and Deploy
ERP Implementation Activities: Phase 1
Nov - Dec ‘10 Jan - Apr ‘11 May ’11 - Mar ‘12 Apr - Jul ‘12
Establish Team and Charter
Map Current Processes
Define Future Business Processes
Approve New Processes
Define Future Business Scenarios
Simulate Scenarioson E9 Software
Document SpecsFor Modifications
Identify Needed Modifications
Develop & Test Modifications
SOPsAssess in CRP &
Repeat
Work InstructionsTraining Aides
Training of Trainers
End-user Training
High Value Stock Take
Security & Tech Deployment
Cutover & Data Migration
Reports
LaunchJuly 23, 2012
Servers, Desktops, Connectivity Ordering
Organizational Assessment
Epicor Vision Training
Epicor Detailed Training
ERP Successes
• System is Live as of July 23, 2012 and in use to operate the business (only 10-15% customized)
• Strong commitment from MSD and USG• Collaborative decision making, effective risk
management– MSD owns the process and SCMS provides consultant
expertise and vender management• Project ownership and team empowered to re-engineer
the business• Enhanced MSD technical expertise on system
evaluation, selection, business re-engineering, system design & deployment processes
ERP Challenges
• Very high learning curve for MSD core team delayed taking ownership of implementation
• Vender unfamiliar with constraints of deliverables-based, fix-price contract
• Need to change ineffective Project Managers (SCMS, Epicor)• Availability of key staff in all parties, staff changes• Lack of common understanding of terminology (definitions,
acronyms)• Requiring twice as much time and 50% more budget than
originally planned.
Original:$3.2 million
Jan – Oct 2011 (Go Live)
Revised:$4.7 million
Jan 2011 – July 2012 (Go Live)
Questions?
Epicor 9 ERP User Acceptance Testing