+ All Categories
Home > Documents > climate change to community-level impacts on via a trait ...€¦ · Linking climate change to...

climate change to community-level impacts on via a trait ...€¦ · Linking climate change to...

Date post: 02-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: ngohanh
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
19
Linking climate change to community-level impacts on copepods via a new, trait-based model Neil Banas,* Eva Møller, Torkel Nielsen, Lisa Eisner *Univ of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK neilbanas.com/projects
Transcript

Linking climate change to community-level impacts on copepods via a new, trait-based model

Neil Banas,* Eva Møller, Torkel Nielsen, Lisa Eisner

*Univ of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK neilbanas.com/projects

Bering Sea (60°N)

warm years; US Pacific Northwest (45°N)

warm decades

Disko Bay, West Greenland warm deep-water intrusions in 2000s

North Sea warming trend, 1960s–

Region-specific shifts in zooplankton community composition

Calanus spp. vs Pseudocalanus spp.

C. hyperboreus, C. glacialis vs C. finmarchicus

C. finmarchicus vs C. helgolandicus impacts on pollock, salmon, cod, forage fish like herring and sandeels, seabirds, whales….

survivorship Ndevelopmental stage D

Optimal annual routines (Varpe et al. 2007, 2009; Houston & McNamara 1999, Clark & Mangel 2000)

Emergent copepod communities (Record et al. 2013)

Past approaches

Coltrane (Copepod Life-history traits and adaptation to novel environments)

focus on reserves and timing

trait-based metacommunity

reserves R

structural biomass S population: annual cycle, net growth rate

small number of variable traits community associated with a given environment

×

survivorship N

developmental stage D

reserves R

structural biomass S

Q10 = 3

Q10 = 2.5; rates ~ S – 0.3

u0 (development rate corrected to 0°C) is the key trait generating size diversity (Banas and Campbell, MEPS, submitted; see poster)

net gain = ingestion – metabolism

mortality

Diapause is on/off based on a “myopic” criterion; turns off development, ingestion, and mortality, and reduces metabolism to 1/4 (Maps et al. 2012)

(Saiz and Calbet 2007; Forster et al. 2011)

survivorship N

developmental stage D

reserves R

structural biomass S

Two versions: “egg/reserves”: explicit model for income egg production (from ingestion) and capital egg production (from R)

“potential”: replace R with free scope 𝜑; look for the optimal date on which to spend it on eggs (i.e. the stable cycle that maximises egg fitness)

DiskoBay

M2

Newport

ShebaM8

E Be

ring S

ea

45°

60°

75°

180°

Large-scale biogeographic patterns

(e.g., poles to tropics)

Coexistence of multiple strategies in one environment

Time variability in one system (years to decades)

A general theory of large zooplankton in relation to environment ought to be able to reproduce

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

Disko Bay

Newport

Sheba

4+ gen/yr3210.5

Duration of prey availability ∂t

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Idealised “global biogeography” testbed

Generations per year vs. habitat in a C. glacialis/marshallae analog

(u0 = 0.007 d–1)

Gaussian window of prey availability; constant surface temperature;

deep temperature = 0.4 · surface

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

Duration of prey availability ∂t

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

(a) (b) (c)

0 1 2 3 4

Maximum egg fitness FRange of viability

2 yr life cycle

1 yr life cycle

u0 = 0.01 d–1 u0 = 0.007 d–1 u0 = 0.005 d–1

Large-scale biogeographic patterns

(e.g., poles to tropics)

Coexistence of multiple strategies in one environment

Time variability in one system: Eastern Bering Sea

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Prey

sat

urat

ion

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10 Surface

Bottom

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Date of ice retreat (yearday)

Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Bloom follows ice retreat

Increasing ice algae

Bloom delayed by winter mixingPo

pula

tion

grow

th ra

te

73234

210 1100

5700 2600

1600

Southeast Bering Sea (M2),1971–2012

Northeast Bering Sea (M8),1971–2012

C. glacialis/marshallae abundance(log mean, ind m–2)

Bering Sea, C. glacialis/marshallae

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Prey

sat

urat

ion

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10 Surface

Bottom

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

Date of ice retreat (yearday)

Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Bloom follows ice retreat

Increasing ice algae

Bloom delayed by winter mixing

Popu

latio

n gr

owth

rate

73234

210 1100

5700 2600

1600

Southeast Bering Sea (M2),1971–2012

Northeast Bering Sea (M8),1971–2012

C. glacialis/marshallae abundance(log mean, ind m–2)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Prey

sat

urat

ion

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10 Surface

Bottom

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)Date of ice retreat (yearday)

Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Bloom follows ice retreat

Increasing ice algae

Bloom delayed by winter mixing

Popu

latio

n gr

owth

rate

73234

210 1100

5700 2600

1600

Southeast Bering Sea (M2),1971–2012

Northeast Bering Sea (M8),1971–2012

C. glacialis/marshallae abundance(log mean, ind m–2)

At both coarse and fine levels of detail, the threshhold for viability of high-latitude Calanus

is mainly a matter of timing, not temperature

Bering Sea, C. glacialis/marshallae

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

Disko Bay

Newport

Sheba

4+ gen/yr3210.5

Duration of prey availability ∂t

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

global (idealised)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 1800

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Prey

sat

urat

ion

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

0

0.4

0.8

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10

Jan 1 Dec 31

Tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

0

5

10 Surface

Bottom

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)Date of ice retreat (yearday)

Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31Jan 1 Dec 31 Jan 1 Dec 31

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

Bloom follows ice retreat

Increasing ice algae

Bloom delayed by winter mixing

Popu

latio

n gr

owth

rate

73234

210 1100

5700 2600

1600

Southeast Bering Sea (M2),1971–2012

Northeast Bering Sea (M8),1971–2012

C. glacialis/marshallae abundance(log mean, ind m–2)

Warming per se is not necessarily a stressor

Bering Sea, C. glacialis/marshallae

0 100 200 300

0

5

10

15

Disko Bay

Newport

Sheba

4+ gen/yr3210.5

Duration of prey availability ∂t

Annu

al m

ean

surf

ace

tem

pera

ture

(°C

)

global (idealised)

Large-scale biogeographic patterns

Coexistence of multiple strategies in one environment: Disko Bay, West Greenland

Time variability in one system (years to decades)

Disko Bay

1996–97 annual cycle + two axes of diversity: u0 (development rate → adult size) tegg (delay between maturation and egg production)

Adult size (µg C)

100 200 500 1000 2000

Gen

erat

ion

leng

th (y

r)

0

1

2

3

4

Adult size (µg C)

Gen

erat

ion

leng

th (y

r)

C. finmarchicus C. glacialis C. hyperboreus (Swalethorp et al. 2011)

Prey

con

cent

ratio

n P

(mg

chl m

–3)

Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct

Rela

tive

egg

prod

uctio

n

C. g

laci

alis

C. h

yper

bore

us

C. fi

nmar

chic

us

0

0.2

0.1

10

5

15

0

P

Adult size (µg C) Adult size (µg C)

Adult size (µg C) Adult size (µg C)

50 100 200 500 1000 2000

Med

ian

spaw

ning

dat

e (y

eard

ay)

80

100

120

140

160

180

50 100 200 500 1000 2000

D a

t firs

t dia

paus

e

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

50 100 200 500 1000 2000

Cap

ital f

ract

ion

of e

gg p

rodu

ctio

n

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

50 100 200 500 1000 2000

Mea

n re

serv

e fr

actio

n

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

C4C5

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

Pure capital breeding

Pure income breeding

Wa50 100 200 500 1000 2000

tEcen jittered

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

Wa50 100 200 500 1000 2000

Ddiam

injittered

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

Wa50 100 200 500 1000 2000

capfrac

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Wa50 100 200 500 1000 2000

rhom

ean

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

Adult size (µg C)

Wax

est

er c

onte

nt (f

ract

ion

of to

tal C

)

C. finmarchicusC. glacialis

C. hyperboreus

1 yr/gen

2 yr/gen

3 yr/gen

( = Swalethorp et al. 2011)

Where this is headed

IPCC AR5

highly realistic, single-species copepod models current rules transposed to a new ocean

Coltrane metacommunity predictions all possible ways to be an anthropocene copepod

(actual adaptive capacity somewhere in between)

Summary

Many patterns in Calanus spp. (in latitude, time, and trait space) can be reproduced as a consequence of a handful of constraints in an individual’s energy budget…

total energy available in an environment per year; energy and time required to build a body; metabolic and predation penalties for taking too long to mature and reproduce; size and temperature scalings for vital rates

Phenology is crucial, but not (in these examples) through match/mismatch.

This approach constitutes a metacommunity model on top of which one can layer other species-level or region-specific constraints: cues for diapause, physiology of egg production, prey quality and selectivity, environmental dependence of predation, and so on.

neilbanas.com/projects/coltrane


Recommended