Clinton Emails News.

7/25/2019 Clinton Emails News.

1/29

In a letter disclosed Monday in a federal court filing, the FBI confirms one ofthe worlds worst-kept secrets: It is looking into Hillary Clintons use of a private email server.

Why say this at all, since it was widely known to be true? Because in August inresponse to a judges direction, the State Department asked the FBI for information about what it was up to. Sorry, the FBI said at the time, we can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any investigation.

Now, in a letter dated February 2 and filed in court Monday, the FBIs general counsel, James Baker, notes that in public statements and congressional testimony,the FBI has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server.

Baker says the FBI has not, however, publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope or potential targets of any such proceedings.

He ends the one-paragraph letter by saying that the FBI cannot say more without adversely affecting on-going law enforcement efforts.

www.msnbc.com...

We all knew this was true, but were continually assured by the ardent Hillary supporters and Militant liberals that NOBODY was investigating Hillary. Well, it'sofficial. She is the investigation. This can no longer be denied. If you watchthe video, they keep saying it's the worst kept secret in Washington. I guess they kept it under wraps so the few delusional folks could maintain their false hope for as long as possible.

I just hope this ends with justice and not another white water wash.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters ReadLeader

Im old (er) be nicemember

Registered: 9-1-2010Location: Bedford FallsMood: ???Member is on ATS now.1,749 1,0334,418 42 44

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:15 link quote reply a reply to: network dude

How she can possibly, remotely think in her tiny little head, that she can be aleader for the United States of America, is, to me, unfathomable.....

Good find Net- Thanks for sharing.... it took the FBI to insure the facts that we knew were true..... maybe, just maybe, their system needs a facelift as well..

Read my Lips


2/29

ReaDlEAder Sublimecraft

Scholar-Fighter

Registered: 4-5-2012Location: Fremantle, AustraliaMood:Member was on ATS7 minutes ago 4,720 3,41139,751 282 134


This somewhat restores my confidence in the US justice system, for a while thereI was convinced that destroying state evidence and pleading ingnorance whilst holding a senior position within the government guaranteed your nomination for the Democratic party.

NewzNoseSmell TesterMember

Registered: 14-8-2015Location: HereMood: intriguedMember was on ATS14 minutes ago 1,566 674,264 28 41


I recall a thread on here a few months back when her server was taken. Many memb

ers reacted in defense of HC's actions and attacked the OP for daring to go there.

There really should be a law that any candidate running for POTUS while having an active FBI investigation, must place campaign on hold until investigation hasbeen completed and candidate is not charged.

I am no historian, so how many times has a POTUS candidate been under formal FBIinvestigation?

Whenever you stop to think remember to start again. network dudeBack to being aMember

Registered: 7-5-2008Location: Dunn, NCMood: betterMember is on ATS now.14,257 2,44531,720 239 35


3/29

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:17 link quote reply

originally posted by: Sublimecrafta reply to: network dude

This somewhat restores my confidence in the US justice system, for a while thereI was convinced that destroying state evidence and pleading ingnorance whilst holding a senior position within the government guaranteed your nomination for the Democratic party.

not to be a wet blanket, but the fat lady is still eating. She won't be singingfor a few hours yet.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters Bennyzilla

Member

Registered: 20-8-2015

Location: Shadow MosesMood: HungryMember is offline.330 01,980 12 90

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:18 link quote reply But wait a minute...I was assured by many on ATS that this was all a bunch of crazy right-wing hooey phooey.

network dudeBack to being aMember



originally posted by: BennyzillaBut wait a minute...I was assured by many on ATS that this was all a bunch of cr

azy right-wing hooey phooey.

It's obviously still a right wing conspiracy, but we were able to get the FBI tojump in on it too, so the reach and scope of said conspiracy is wide and deep.Haters gotta hate.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friend


4/29

we were all equal in the end -Roger Waters network dudeBack to being aMember



originally posted by: ReadLeadera reply to: network dude

How she can possibly, remotely think in her tiny little head, that she can be aleader for the United States of America, is, to me, unfathomable.....

in all fairness, she would fit in like a glove with what we have right now. I think being caught doing something honest in D.C. can get you 10 years to life.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters AugustusMasonicusStudent of History - High Level Masonmember

Registered: 7-10-2007Location: West Orange, N.J.Mood: Shillaxin

Member is offline.19,288 89259,042 388 46

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:28 link quote reply While nothing would make mehappier than her receiving an all inclusive vacation to ADX Florence Supermax for the remainder of her unnatural life I still think Dear Leader will get her a pass on this.

I will pray to most merciful Cthulhu that I am wrong.

Si vis pacem para bellum. Non cogito ergo extraterrestrialis.Antiquis temporibus nati tibi similes in rupibus ventosissimis exponebantur ad n

ecem.Quo usque tandem abutere patientia nostra?Caesar si viveret ad remum dareris. Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam. DJW001

member



5/29

Location: EarthMood:Member was on ATS35 minutes ago 16,697 98132,380 229 30


We all knew this was true, but were continually assured by the ardent Hillary supporters and Militant liberals that NOBODY was investigating Hillary. Well, it'sofficial. She is the investigation.

Funny, I could swear the statement said: "working generally on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server,not: "We are investigating former Secretary Clinton on suspicion of criminal activities or treason."

jjkenobi

Member

Registered: 29-9-2008Location: IndianaMood: RelaxedMember was on ATS35 minutes ago 3,184 598,753 57 41

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:36 link quote reply There was another article out yesterday or today speculating that the 18 known E-mails between Obama and Hillary's private E-mail that have not been released are causing massive heartburnfor the investigative agencies and slowing all progress of any legal actions.

intrptr

Member

Registered: 30-8-2011Location: Planet EarthMood: IconoclasticMember was on ATS54 minutes ago 24,300 10147,404 318 29


It is looking into Hillary Clintons use of a private email server.

Why say this at all, since it was widely known to be true?

To put people off.

"Were looking for some stuff, we're talking to some people, we're figuring it all out, and we'll get back to you."


6/29

--Chris Rock

Things were the way they were not the way you remember them.Things are the way they are not the way you perceive them.Things will be the way they will be not the way you foresee them. jellyrev

Member

Registered: 14-3-2015Location:Mood:Member is on ATS now.295 0778 5 40


Looks like the Koch brothers have really deep pockets

The bigger the game the bigger the con intrptr

Member

Registered: 30-8-2011Location: Planet EarthMood: IconoclasticMember was on ATS54 minutes ago 24,300 10147,404 318 29


I think being caught doing something honest in D.C. can get you 10 years to life

.

You're right. They're all guilty or complicit of doing or knowing of something illegal.

The only ones "caught" are those that fall out of favor.

Things were the way they were not the way you remember them.Things are the way they are not the way you perceive them.Things will be the way they will be not the way you foresee them. daaskapital

Writer-Fighter-Scholar

Registered: 24-7-2011Location:Mood:Member was on ATS21 minutes ago 6,110 6,59921,285 217 63



7/29

It's interesting when one actually takes a look at the quote from James Baker:

...the FBI has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server.


Even though the FBI is yet to acknowledge the specifics of the investigation, the highlighted part of the quote clearly shows that investigations are being madeinto Hillary's use of the private email server, rather than just the server itself.

This is great. Hopefully Hillary will continue to sink from here.

Krazysh0tSkepticalmember

Registered: 7-2-2012Location: MarylandMood: InterestedMember was on ATS7 minutes ago 23,050 4,05075,773 531 51


originally posted by: network dudeWe all knew this was true, but were continually assured by the ardent Hillary supporters and Militant liberals that NOBODY was investigating Hillary.

For the life of me I can't think of anyone who denied that an investigation washappening. I can think of people skeptical that anything will come of the investigation though.

I dont know what to put here at the moment. CranialSponge

Member

Registered: 18-4-2011Location: Canada

Mood: meh...Member was on ATS54 minutes ago 4,274 4313,932 89 49

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 17:55 link quote reply Oh come on you guys, put onyour ATS thinking caps.

We all know that in 16 months from now the FBI will announce that they found nosubstantial evidence of any criminal behaviour on the part of Hillary Rodham Cli


8/29

nton.

And that'll be the end of that.

Pfft.

Some mornings its just not worth chewing through the leather straps. ~ Emo Phillips butcherguyATS is so wonderful.Member

Registered: 24-9-2009Location: Don\'t believe a word I say.Mood: Stormy.... appaMember is on ATS now.20,135 74255,919 369 42


originally posted by: DJW001a reply to: network dude

Funny, I could swear the statement said: "working generally on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server,not: "We are investigating former Secretary Clinton on suspicion of criminal activities or treason."

You read it right.

So the FBI is obviously investigating so that they can check for wrongdoing by the person or persons responsible for forcing poor Hillary to use her own privateemail server and forced her to let them also use her private email server, right?

One question though....If there is nothing to see here, just what is the FBI investigating.... for allthis time?

Cats spread tuberculosis!Do not let them kill you....www.foxnews.com... Necrobile

Member

Registered: 23-10-2011Location:

Mood:Member is offline.291 7801 5 42


As much as I love the idea that she's being investigated, I can't help but wonder, will anything even come of it?? Even if she's found to be completely guilty,with her connections, would anything happen?? I guess if nothing else, making it


9/29

so she can't be president would be nice, but man, I keep hoping they throw thebook at her. :

A moment enjoyed is never wasted..... interupt42

Member

Registered: 23-1-2012Location:Mood:Member was on ATS30 minutes ago 4,315 6468,537 65 31


originally posted by: Sublimecrafta reply to: network dude

This somewhat restores my confidence in the US justice system, for a while thereI was convinced that destroying state evidence and pleading ingnorance whilst holding a senior position within the government guaranteed your nomination for th

e Democratic party.

I would say its to early to say that. Lets see if it ends like the Congregational Bailout reality tv show . A lot of harsh words and no action and no convictions at the top.

Congress the Best Buy for return on your investment.12>favoritesubscribenew thread

replyalert

join ATSATS statsadvertising on ATScontact ATSabout ATSprivacy policyterms & conditionsusing our contentDMCA procedure

ATS homeATS forumstop topicshot topicsrecent postsnew topicsThe Above Top Secret Web site is a wholly owned social content community of TheAbove Network, LLC.This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains


10/29

strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for freeexpression.

All content copyright 2016, The Above Network, LLC.

viewport: 2114 x 1061 | docume

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

For the life of me I can't think of anyone who denied that an investigation washappening. I can think of people skeptical that anything will come of the investigation though.

I know right?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

Can we PLEASE stop relying on a friend of a friend saying "for realsies this tim

e, Hillary is getting indicted!" and just go to the horse's mouth? Wait until the FBI says something official then we will know if it is going to happen or not...

this thread was full of tears and people whining about the source. Turns out tobe right on time.

the horses mouth has spoken.edit on 9-2-2016 by network dude because: (no reason given)edit on 9-2-2016 by network dude because: (no reason given)

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters network dudeBack to being aMember

Registered: 7-5-2008Location: Dunn, NCMood: betterMember is on ATS now.

14,257 2,44531,720 239 35


originally posted by: DJW001a reply to: network dude


11/29

Funny, I could swear the statement said: "working generally on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server,not: "We are investigating former Secretary Clinton on suspicion of criminal activities or treason."you may not have read far enough.

...the FBI has acknowledged generally that it is working on matters related to former Secretary Clintons use of a private email server.


and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters Looselungjones

Member

Registered: 13-11-2015Location:Mood:

Member was on ATS58 minutes ago 31 045 0.31 22

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 18:29 link quote reply The ignorance here is amazing. She will win you will cry and complain for another 8.

DJW001

member

Registered: 13-2-2010Location: EarthMood:Member was on ATS35 minutes ago 16,697 98132,380 229 30

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 18:31 link quote reply a reply to: butcherguy

So the FBI is obviously investigating so that they can check for wrongdoing by the person or persons responsible for forcing poor Hillary to use her own privateemail server and forced her to let them also use her private email server, righ

t?

They are investigating to see whether her use of a private email server actuallyendangered national security. It may not have been illegal.

One question though....If there is nothing to see here, just what is the FBI investigating.... for allthis time?


12/29

First, they had to determine whether or not they had jurisdiction. Now there isa swamp of technicalities they have to negotiate. What are the standards for handling classified material within the State Department? Was any of the information classified by another branch of government, and was it handled appropriately?Is Hillary responsible for actions taken by her staff without her knowledge? I know some of you can't wait to see her burned at the stake, but if W could ignorea memo that specifically warned that al Qaeda was planning on weaponizing passenger aircraft and not get put on trial or even impeached, I wouldn't expect Hillary to face any charges for using her personal electronics for business purposes.

network dudeBack to being aMember

Registered: 7-5-2008Location: Dunn, NCMood: better

Member is on ATS now.14,257 2,44531,720 239 35

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 18:35 link quote reply a reply to: DJW001

are you in the FBI? I'd hate to have all sorts of speculation going on about this. I know in the past, speculation was frowned upon. let's just deal with facts.what we KNOW is the FBI has admitted to having an active investigation into Sec. Clinton's use of a private server for e-mail during her time as Sec of State.

I guess we will just have to wait to see where this investigation leads.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters Krazysh0tSkepticalmember

Registered: 7-2-2012Location: MarylandMood: InterestedMember was on ATS

7 minutes ago 23,050 4,05075,774 531 51


But she hasn't been indicted yet... Unless I read the OP wrong, it is just saying she is under investigation. Where is the indictment?

For the record, that post wasn't denying that an investigation was occurring. Itwas denying that an indictment was imminent based on the opinion of some guy no


13/29

t related to the investigation. Maybe try some reading comprehension next time?edit on 9-2-2016 by Krazysh0t because: (no reason given)

I dont know what to put here at the moment. network dudeBack to being aMember


posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 18:43 link quote reply a reply to: Krazysh0t

I am just reporting what was said. All our words exist forever here, so there will be no way to pretend words weren't typed. I didn't say she was being indicted, I said what the article said. She is officially under investigation. Perhaps reading comprehension isn't your best quality either.


Registered: 7-2-2012Location: MarylandMood: InterestedMember was on ATS

7 minutes ago 23,050 4,05075,774 531 51


And I stand by my statements. I'm not denying ANYTHING I've said now or in the past, but context is key and trying to quote me out of context or misrepresent what I said to score points or stars is dishonest and rude.

I dont know what to put here at the moment. DrakeINFERNO

Member

Registered: 21-8-2012Location: ERTHMood:Member was on ATS26 minutes ago 355 01,126 7 48



14/29

the king of reporting false equivalencies for stars and flags calling the kettleblack har har.

Everyone must be held accountable for their actions. GothmogHigh Captain of AngbandMember

Registered: 28-4-2015Location: On one of the 9 layersMood: DisbeliefMember was on ATS24 minutes ago 2,198 06,452 41 44


For the life of me I can't think of anyone who denied that an investigation washappening.

Hillary said so herself....and a lot of folks picked up on HER statement. Unfortunately , like 110% of what she says , turned out to be a lie also, She knew

ATS then : Deny IgnoranceATS now: Deny the massive manure spreading Krazysh0tSkepticalmember


posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 19:08 link quote reply a reply to: Gothmog

Well that's one I guess, but no one believes her anyways.

I dont know what to put here at the moment. network dude

Back to being aMember

Registered: 7-5-2008Location: Dunn, NCMood: betterMember is on ATS now.14,257 2,445


15/29

31,720 239 35


originally posted by: Krazysh0ta reply to: network dude

And I stand by my statements. I'm not denying ANYTHING I've said now or in the past, but context is key and trying to quote me out of context or misrepresent what I said to score points or stars is dishonest and rude.

in the interest of being fair, honest and not rude, I only quoted what you said.If it's out of context, just explain what I missed.

the FBI SAID SOMETHING OFFICIAL. If that was not what you meant, please explainthat.




Fine, they said they are officially investigating her. I didn't have my doubts t

here, but there you have it. I'm still waiting for this imminent indictment thathas been coming for the last half year myself. What's the official word on that?

I dont know what to put here at the moment. CharlieSpeirs

Member

Registered: 20-1-2014Location:Mood: Forgiving



You can clearly see in what you quoted that Krazy said she isn't being indictedpresently...And to wait for official word from the FBI.


16/29

Don't be lazy, network.It's unbecoming.

Never worked for a Zionist never been a "yes-man"My art is like Rembrandt painting pictures of Death Camps ~ Lowkey tadamanHolder of it downmember

Registered: 22-2-2013Location: In soul, Out mindMood: Willing.Member was on ATS5 minutes ago 4,174 96311,535 86 44

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 19:13 link quote reply a reply to: NewzNose

Can you imagine if she gets elected, but has to serve a mandatory sentence of acouple months after a pardon...!! So our soon to be president starts running thecountry from a cell or under house arrest until she takes office.

I almost want her to win now just to see that happen.

Maybe she will get a conditional pardon where she is required to serve the remainder of her sentence after her time in office is up.

edit on 2 9 2016 by tadaman because: (no reason given)

We are our own priests. The world is our temple. Our heart is our religion. Ourspirit is the bond we share with humanity. We are our own souls keeper and thatis our covenant with all creation. network dudeBack to being aMember



originally posted by: Krazysh0ta reply to: network dude

Fine, they said they are officially investigating her. I didn't have my doubts there, but there you have it. I'm still waiting for this imminent indictment thathas been coming for the last half year myself. What's the official word on that?

Don't know, we haven't heard what the FBI has OFFICIALLY found. But we will. I guess will will just have to wait. (and militantly argue against any and all speculation on the matter.) So I'll just stick to facts for now.


17/29




See. We didn't have to have a confrontational argument. You could have skipped being rude to me initially and we would have had a much easier conversation. It appears we are in agreement. Wait until official information is out before speculating.

I dont know what to put here at the moment. network dudeBack to being aMember


posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 19:18 link quote reply a reply to: CharlieSpeirs

Oh Chuckles, he's a big boy. I quoted the whole thing so as NOT to take anythingout of context. It was for the "FBI says something official" comment. Based onwhat I read in this article, the FBI said something official. Or is there some ambiguity about that?

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters xuenchenIts Not My Fault Your Idealisms are a FailureMember

Registered: 23-9-2010Location: Las Vegas & ChicagoMood: #hillaryousMember is on ATS now.26,709 24,83593,897 903 62


18/29

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 19:20 link quote reply Longshot possibility....

Maybe Hillary is getting arrogant because she has already been granted immunity.

The FBI has already "interviewed" some key people including some of her top aides and associates.

Maybe she throws them under the bus and gets away clean.

If so, the "trial" will be in the press.

CharlieSpeirs

Member

Registered: 20-1-2014Location:Mood: Forgiving



I know he can look after himself he is a great debater on our boards...

But it seemed a tad unfair that even if you were only highlighting the "wait andsee" part you didn't take it in the context of an indictment.

Just seemed a little sloppy from you if I'm honest.If it was the other way round I'd defend you too fella.

I just enjoy rattling your cage. And you can lie and say you don't like doing that, but deep down, you know it's why you post in the political threads. It's allgood. When the elections are over, and we get a 2.5 year reprieve on the election bull #, we can go back to the important stuff. Like worrying about the flat earth and all.

in the mean time, I'll continue to really, really, really dislike Mrs. Clinton.

If i didn't like you, I'd ignore you. I still think there's hope in turning youand Speirs into right wingers. I just have to keep showing you the error of your

ways.

and as the windshield melts and my tears evaporate leaving only charcoal to defendfinally i understand the feelings of the few ashes and diamonds foe and friendwe were all equal in the end -Roger Waters CharlieSpeirs

Member


19/29

Registered: 20-1-2014Location:Mood: ForgivingMember is on ATS now.10,831 1,71839,712 271 57

posted on Feb, 9 2016 @ 19:26 link quote reply a reply to: xuenchen

If so, the "trial" will be in the press.

The kangeroo trial in the court of public opinion began about a year ago...& I'm quite certain it was one of your threads that got the ball rolling.

Granted immunity?

She is not a foreign diplomat, she is a potential elected representative.

If she has done lawfully wrong, she will be charged.

If she has done morally inept, she will be free to go.

I think it'll be the latter honestly.

Never worked for a Zionist never been a "yes-man"My art is like Rembrandt painting pictures of Death Camps ~ Lowkey butcherguyATS is so wonderful.Member

Registered: 24-9-2009Location: Don\'t believe a word I say.Mood: Stormy.... appa

Member is on ATS now.20,136 74255,919 369 42


I still think there's hope in turning you and Speirs into right wingers.

They say that there's always hope.... but man, that's a tough nut to crack rightthere.

Cats spread tuberculosis!Do not let them kill you....www.foxnews.com... Krazysh0tSkepticalmember



20/29

Location: MarylandMood: InterestedMember is on ATS now.23,051 4,05075,774 531 51


But I don't like Clinton either...

PS: I don't want to be a right winger any more than I like being labeled as a left winger. I swing all over the political spectrum depending on the issues I find important and the politicians willing to voice and support them. Since you like checking out my post history, check out my partisan slant back in 2012.

Don't let the title fool you, this thread does not offer proof that the Moon landings were faked, it provides a definition of what evidence would be necessary to prove they were.

Whether or not astronauts landed on the Moon in the last century, or indeed, whether or not human beings have even left the surface of the Earth, is not a scientific question, it is an historical one. Historical methodology uses a number ofcritical techniques to examine several types of evidence: contemporary documentation, eyewitness accounts, secondary sources, and physical evidence. All of the

se are cross checked against one another. The reliability of each source is evaluated, and a theory constructed to harmonize them all. As further evidence emerges, such as the discovery of new archives or physical remains, this evidence isincorporated into the theory if it fits, or the theory is altered to accommodateit.

One fallacy that Moon Hoax proponents make is that "if a single detail is wrongor contradictory, the entire narrative must be false." This is a fallacy becausedocumentation is subject to human error. Numbers get miscounted, locations getmisidentified. Every few years archaeologists or military historians "discover"where the Battle of Agincourt took place. Just because the battlefield seems tomeander across the French countryside from year to year does not dismay historians. There is ample documentation, first hand in some cases, from both French and

English sources to confirm that such a battle took place. Furthermore, the course of history would probably have been much different had it not. Likewise, it is no problem that the French and English sources "spin" their narratives to maketheir knights more virtuous and the other side more treacherous. The body counts were adjusted accordingly.

Another major fallacy is that the burden of proof lies entirely on those who affirm the historical record. This leads to moving goalpost phenomenon. First, theywant confirmation from a source that is not NASA. When that is provided, they claim that the source has somehow been corrupted, and want another one.When thatis provided, they claim it, too, was faked, and so on. If one wishes to claim that the body of historical evidence is false, the burden of proof falls on the challenger.

There is no point hiding behind an opinion being "plausible." If one believes one's interpretation of events is "plausible," one needs to explain why. Why is itplausible that a country would spend billions designing, building and launchingequipment, but not use it for its intended purpose? Why is it plausible that America's geopolitical rivals, the Soviet Union, China, and France, would not expose the fraud? Why is it plausible that the government's internal opponents, likethe Union of Concerned Scientists would not expose it? Why is it plausible thatthousands of scientists and engineers were unable to detect the imposture? Whyis it plausible that they could all be bribed or threatened in order to be silen


21/29

ced? You get the picture.

I consider myself to be objective, and am perfectly willing to consider counter-narratives to the history of the space program. I certainly understand that there was much more cloak and dagger involved than the public was allowed to see: Blue Gemini, MOL, the (still) classified telecommunications and ranging experiments flown on various missions. I'm sure the political narrative was not as clean as it is usually presented. (Ever notice how most of the newly built NASA bases were below the Mason-Dixon line?) The squeaky clean image of the first astronautsis also suspect. There is adequate documentation to make inferences about these"counter-narratives."

But what about the allegation that the lunar landings were somehow "faked." Well, given how much documentation the historical record contains, anyone making that claim has got a lot of work they need to do. They need to provide an equal volume of:

1) Executive Orders authorizing various phases of the deception.

2) Memoranda from government officials and private contractors describing aspects of the hoax.

3) Blueprints for the special sound stages used to fake the film and videos.

4) Technical drawings of the rigging used to simulate reduced/zero gravity.

5) Detailed accounting records showing how the project was paid for.

6) Employment records detailing the names of the thousands of engineers, technicians, and special effects experts employed in the project.

7) The physical remains of the sound stage(s) used.

8) The physical remains of the various props, scale models, etc.

9) Eyewitness accounts by individuals involved in the project.

10) Journal entries detailing employees participation.

11) "Out-takes," hours and hours of film and video that could not be used for one reason or another.

12) Behind the scene film and photographs showing how the production was done.

Provide me with enough of the above, and I will not only be convinced, I will spread the word. I'm not holding my breath.edit on 1-2-2016 by DJW001 because: (no reason given)

DuckforcoveR

Member

Registered: 27-8-2012Location: WisconsinMood: hungryMember is offline.


22/29

432 261,420 9 50

posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 20:26 link quote reply Nicely said

I know I have heard others say it, but I firmly believe that if there was any small sliver of a doubt that it really happened the way NASA says it happened, there would be a host of other nations who would throw us under the bus in a heartbeat.

I mean think about it, China finds out that it probably actually didn't happen and they now have a small window to be the ACTUAL first?! Or Russia? India? ESA?Sure, there are weird anomalies and a few things that make me wonder, but in noway can I look at the whole picture from both sides and remain rational while saying "we didn't go".

Just no way.

S&F

GothmogHigh Captain of AngbandMember

Registered: 28-4-2015Location: On one of the 9 layersMood: DisbeliefMember was on ATS25 minutes ago 2,198 06,452 41 44

posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 20:27 link quote reply You forgot one :The binding factor preventing the 10s of thousands of folks that would have known from speaking up . And how it would be enforced for all these years.Peace

ATS then : Deny IgnoranceATS now: Deny the massive manure spreading DJW001

member

Registered: 13-2-2010Location: EarthMood:Member was on ATS36 minutes ago 16,697 981

32,380 229 30


originally posted by: GothmogYou forgot one :The binding factor preventing the 10s of thousands of folks that would have known from speaking up . And how it would be enforced for all these years.Peace


23/29

Exactly; the hoax proponents have never even been able to produce an alleged "whistle blower!"

Christosterone

Member

Registered: 5-1-2012Location: TEXASMood:Member is offline.413 1591,486 11 58

posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 20:35 link quote reply I feel like this is you...and your time is gonna come****

***credit to Robert Plant

-Christosterone

schuylerSkyler - retired librarianMember

Registered: 17-4-2007Location: Puget SoundMood: OK

Member is offline.8,327 86019,079,447 111321 34370


originally posted by: DJW001

Another major fallacy is that the burden of proof lies entirely on those who affirm the historical record. This leads to moving goalpost phenomenon. First, theywant confirmation from a source that is not NASA. When that is provided, they claim that the source has somehow been corrupted, and want another one.When thatis provided, they claim it, too, was faked, and so on. If one wishes to claim th

at the body of historical evidence is false, the burden of proof falls on the challenger.

Oh, yeah, the "Groundhog Theory." probably should be called Whack-a-Mole. Somebody "demands" a question be answered. It is, definitively, and they pop up out ofanother hole with an entirely different issue.

In America the young are always ready to give to those who are older than themselves the full benefits of their inexperience. -- Oscar Wilde VP740


24/29

Member

Registered: 20-8-2015Location:Mood:Member is offline.323 18496 4 24


I think the the type of evidence presented by conspiracy theorists on this is fair game, it just doesn't hold up to scrutiny.

The person reading this doesnt exist if they arent reading. Krazysh0tSkepticalmember

Registered: 7-2-2012Location: Maryland

Mood: InterestedMember is on ATS now.23,051 4,05075,774 531 51

posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 20:48 link quote reply Nice thread. You had me worried there for a second with your thread title. Glad I read on.

I dont know what to put here at the moment. redoubtOld as dirtWriter

Registered: 28-9-2007Location: Pine Tick HollerMood: DeorbitingMember was on ATS22 minutes ago 4,475 4208,436 62 29


Thread Title:"The Moon Landings Were Faked: PROOF"

First 18 words:"Don't let the title fool you, this thread does not offer proof that the Moon landings were faked"

Thank you for setting the perfect example of why NEVER to trust a title here......and also, why that is so doggone regrettable.

Have a nice day

...


25/29

The virtue and perfection of cynicism is that you are rarely if ever wrong and never at all disappointed if you are. DJW001

member


posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 21:02 link quote reply a reply to: redoubt

No comment on the actual content of the thread?

redoubtOld as dirtWriter

Registered: 28-9-2007Location: Pine Tick HollerMood: DeorbitingMember was on ATS22 minutes ago 4,475 4208,436 62 29


originally posted by: DJW001a reply to: redoubt

No comment on the actual content of the thread?

Go find a book... look at the title. If it draws a degree of interest to see youpull it and flip it open... and then find the initial wording as such?

No. None.

...

The virtue and perfection of cynicism is that you are rarely if ever wrong and never at all disappointed if you are. Biigs

Hanibal HAL Solomember

Registered: 19-4-2011Location: In Front of PCMood: ReasonableMember is offline.6,483 504


26/29


27/29

d to call this type of title, "Click bait"

The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulatethis unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed our minds are moulded our tastes formed our ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of.Edward Bernays 3n19m470Groom of the Stoolmember

Registered: 19-10-2011Location: Omnipresent like UMood: F#iNGlouriousMember is offline.3,535 595,094 36 22

posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 22:25 link quote reply What is the meaning of the following quoted statement from your OP? Space launch is easier/cheaper near the

equator, from what I understand, but I guess, perhaps not all NASA bases are launch sites, and furthermore, your point seems to have something to do with politics.

(Ever notice how most of the newly built NASA bases were below the Mason-Dixon line?)a reply to: DJW001

All these things will I give thee if thou wilt fall down and worship me. DJW001

member



originally posted by: 3n19m470

What is the meaning of the following quoted statement from your OP? Space launchis easier/cheaper near the equator, from what I understand, but I guess, perhaps not all NASA bases are launch sites, and furthermore, your point seems to havesomething to do with politics.

a reply to: DJW001


28/29

Yes, rather than build launch sites in the Virgin Islands, Dominican Republic orPuerto Rico, NASA built bases in Florida and Texas. Cape Canaveral was alreadya test range that was upgraded to a spaceport. LBJ was from Texas. Huntsville, Alabama, became the most important civilian research and development facility. Ithas been suggested that this was part of a politically motivated southern economic development program. I forget the title of the book, but you can probably find references to it by googling.

DJW001

member


posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 22:53 link quote reply a reply to: PLAYERONE01

in the cyber industry we tend to call this type of title, "Click bait"

I prefer to think of it as an eye catching title.

DJW001

member


posted on Feb, 1 2016 @ 22:55 link quote reply a reply to: redoubt

Go find a book... look at the title. If it draws a degree of interest to see youpull it and flip it open... and then find the initial wording as such?

If you find the topic interesting, why not join in? For example, can you think of any reason why none of the evidence I have suggested necessary has never beenprovided?

schuylerSkyler - retired librarianMember


29/29

Registered: 17-4-2007Location: Puget SoundMood: OKMember is offline.8,327 86019,079,447 111321 34370


originally posted by: 3n19m470

What is the meaning of the following quoted statement from your OP? Space launchis easier/cheaper near the equator, from what I understand, but I guess, perhaps not all NASA bases are launch sites, and furthermore, your point seems to havesomething to do with politics.

It's not politics, it is a technical fact. It's easier and cheaper to launch into space closer to the equator. That's the only reason our major launch site is in Florida. It's as close to the equator we can get and still be in US territory.That's why the EU Space Centre is in Guiana, which is 300 miles north of the equator.

In America the young are always ready to give to those who are older than themselves the full benefits of their inexperience. -- Oscar Wilde tinymind

Member

Registered: 6-7-2015Location: Just beyond dispairMood: faultyMember is offline.216 0464 3 32


If someone really wants to prove the moon landings were fack, I ask them to explain one thing to me and I will consider any other "evidence" they may present.

I do not remember the astronauts involved but I have seen the video of the "Galileo test" which was performed on the moon. They astronaut dropped a feather anda hammer at the same time from the same height and they both hit the "ground" atthe same time.

This is not the point of my query.

I want to know how they made the hammer fall so slowly, as it does in the video.Did they somehow "cancel" gravity in the area where they were filming for a fewminutes?

Date post:	24-Feb-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	scully-tindalos
View:	220 times
Download:	0 times

Clinton Emails News.

Documents