Animal Care & Handling ConferenceMarch 29, 2007
Cloning: Consumer Acceptance and
Product Opportunities
Today’s Presentation
Cloning OverviewRisk AssessmentConsumer AcceptanceSupply Chain ManagementProduct Opportunities
These bulls, born April 2006, were cloned from Panhandle Slim, 1997 PBR Bucking Bull of the Year
Cloning History1996 – Roslin Institute clones “Dolly”
1984 – Embryonic cell nuclear transfer in sheep
1983 – First mammal cloned from embryonic cells
1952 – Frogs cloned from adult nuclear cells
1928 – First nuclear transfers performed
1903 – Term “clone” coined
1894 – First clones from blastomere transfer
What is Cloning?Assisted reproduction technology
Artificial Insemination (1322)Embryo Transfer (1891)In vitro Fertilization (1959)Embryo Freezing (1972)
Exact genetic copy of the donor animal“Identical twins separated in time”
Cloning Process
Electrofusion
Embryo Culture
EmbryoTransfer
Gestation
Unfertilized Egg
Remove Nucleus
Cell Culture
Cells
Transfer Donor DNA
Genetic Donor(the “original”
animal)Egg Donor
Recipient(“Surrogate Mother”)
Cloned animal
Keep in mind…
Cloned animals are NOT “Genetically Modified”Progeny of cloned animals ARE NOT “clones”Cloned animals will be rare in food supply
Pigs cloned from show pig Miss Pauline
Progeny of Cloned Animals
Risk Assessment Timeline
FDA risk assessment began 2001Cloned animals & their progeny v non-clonedVoluntary moratoriumTechnology providers
National Academy Reviews (2002, 2004)2006 Draft Risk Assessment90-day comment period (ends April 3, 2007)Final risk assessment by year-end
Risk Assessment: Sound Science
Among largest food safety studiesBased on peer-reviewed researchFDA work reviewed by outside scientists
Risk Assessment Findings
Products from cloned animals & progeny As safe as from non-cloned animalsNational Academy of Sciences: same conclusion
No Unique Risks to AnimalsIETS developing guidelines on animal handling and care
Cloning Is Not a Food Safety Issue
What, if anything, are you concerned about when it comes to food safety? (Open-ended question)
Source: Cogent Research for the International Food Information Council (IFIC). Nationally representative survey of 1,000 adults, March 2005. Margin of error is ±3.1 percentage points.
15%
4%
0%
0%
7%
23%
23%
28%
42%
Don't know
Nothing
Cloning
Biotechnology
Chemicals/pesticides
Ingredients/nutrition
Disease/contamination
Food handling/prep
Packaging
Attitudes are Changeable
43% 53%
Now that you’ve heard more about cloning, would you say the use of cloning in farming, ranching, and food production is completely acceptable, somewhat acceptable, somewhat unacceptable, or completely unacceptable? (KRC Research, 2004)
Unacceptable
Acceptable
63%35%
Unacceptable
Acceptable
BEFORE MESSAGES
AFTER MESSAGES
Completely unacceptable:went from 14% to 10%
Completely acceptable:went from 14% to 13%
Communication and Education
Extensive media outreach What cloning isWhat it is notProvide information for consumers, industry
www.clonesafety.orgBIO, ViaGen, other cloning companies
Processor and retailer meetingAppropriate consumer outreach
Supply Chain Management
On-going industry discussionsEnable companies to meet marketing requirements of their customers
NOT a safety or health issueEnable labeling by exclusionCompatible with NAIS Cloned animals only, not progeny
K.C. was cloned from a carcass. She’s shown here with her traditionally bred calf.
For Cloned Animals Only, Not Progeny
Works for cloned animalsNo “test” to detect cloned animals Requires industry cooperationSmall numbers
Won’t work for progeny of cloned animalsNo unique physical or genetic characteristicsPotential for many progenyRequires NAIS-like program
Process-Based System
Cloned animals are uniquely identifiedTagsTattoos
Registry is a clearing house of information ConfidentialFocal point of communication for all groups
Tracking involves all stakeholdersTechnology providersRegistry (3rd party)ProducersProcessors
Why Clone?
Disseminate best genotypes
Reduce genetic lagUtilize broadly and directlyAmplify impact of superior animals
Increase breeding progressFemalesOvercome death, infertilityIncrease impact of outliers
Product Opportunities
Proven AttributesPro-environmentConsistency
Top: cloned animal 1. Middle: cloned animal 2. Bottom: conventional control animal, matched for age, genetics, breed.
Photo Credit: Carol Guzy, The Washington Post
“It’s like duplicating Michael Jordan until you have five Michael Jordans on a team” – Donald Brown, Throckmorton, TX (Fort Worth Star Telegram)
New Possibilities
Economic Impact
U.S. Swine Industry100 million market hogsClone 15,000 terminal and grand-sires per year$3.00/offspring value$300M impact
U.S. Beef IndustryClone 200,000 natural service sires/year$75.00/offspring value$1.8B impact
“A few years ago, some producers thought embryo transfer was a crazy concept. Cloning could someday take the place of ET.” Cody Gillispie, beef producer, Decatur, TX