+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Closing Remarks

Closing Remarks

Date post: 05-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: olina
View: 83 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 10. Closing Remarks. Presenter: Sebastian Tindall. 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM (15 minutes). Module 10 Closing Remarks & Final Exam. Course Objectives:. To summarize key points made today. Closing Remarks “Final Exam” Questions/feedback from the audience. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
30
1 of 30 Closing Remarks Presenter: Sebastian Tindall 4:45 PM - 5:00 PM (15 minutes) Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 10
Transcript
Page 1: Closing Remarks

1 of 30

Closing Remarks

Presenter: Sebastian Tindall

4:45 PM - 5:00 PM (15 minutes)

Day 2 DQO Training CourseModule 10

Page 2: Closing Remarks

2 of 30

Module 10Closing Remarks & Final Exam

Course Objectives:

To summarize key points made today Closing Remarks “Final Exam” Questions/feedback from the audience

Page 3: Closing Remarks

3 of 30

The DQO Process

“A systematic planning process based on the scientific method for the unambiguous defining of

• Environmental decision criteria

• Data requirements

• Error tolerances

and the documentation/preservation of these details in a consistent, standardized format providing a defensible record of the decision”Merrick “Rick” Blancq, USACE, Portland, OR

Page 4: Closing Remarks

4 of 30

Systematic Planning Doesn’t Just “Happen”

Haphazard approaches yield haphazard results

Tactical approach to implementation Decision makers must work together Successful implementation model evolved

as the DQO Process was used

Page 5: Closing Remarks

5 of 30

Tools Make the Job Easier

Scoping Checklist DQO e-Workbook (electronic template)

– Standardized DQO Report format DQO Web Site

– DQO tools and materials– Latest version of all of today’s slides

Visual Sample Plan (VSP)– Download free software

Data Quality Assessment tools also!

Page 6: Closing Remarks

6 of 30

Managing Uncertainty We are forced to make environmental decisions based on

estimates Estimates always involve errors Errors in estimates are not mistakes If unmanaged, errors in estimates CAN lead to

Decision Errors which ARE MISTAKES Decision Errors must be managed

– Identify– Quantify

Severe consequences of decision errors mandate a statistical basis

Page 7: Closing Remarks

7 of 30

Defensibility

Comes from doing good science

S ampling and A nalys is P lan

Sc oping

Data QualityA ssessment

Dec is ion

Sampling&

A nalys is

Data Quality Objec tives

(DQO)

L aboratory Data Verific ation /

Validation

F ie l d S a mpl ingP l a n(F S P )

Qua l it y A s sura nc e P ro je c t P l a n

(Q A P j P )

H e a lt h a ndSa fe t y P l a n

(H S P )

Requires documentation– “If it isn’t written down, it

didn’t happen” Use a standardized format We must employ the

scientific method to make defensible decisions

Page 8: Closing Remarks

8 of 30

How Many Samples do I Need?

REMEMBER:

HETEROGENEITY

IS THE RULE!

Page 9: Closing Remarks

9 of 30

How many samples do I need?

Begin With the End in Mind

Optimal Sampling Design

Alternative Sample Designs

, , , Correct Equation for n (Statistical Method)

Population Frequency Distribution

Contaminant Concentrations in the Spatial Distribution of the Population

The end

DATA

Page 10: Closing Remarks

10 of 30

Logic to Assess Distribution and Calculate Number of Samples

SkewedCalculate the number of

samples based on skeweddistributions (e.g.,

nonparametric tests suchas WSR or WRS)

Is frequencydistribution from eachpopulation normal or

approximatelynormal?

YesNormal

Use equations based onnormal distribution.

No

Option 1 Option 2

Badly SkewedBadly skewed or for any

distribution, use computersimulations

(e.g.,Monte Carlo) to performcalculations to estimate the

number of samples

Page 11: Closing Remarks

11 of 30

“Normal” FD

“Skewed” FD

Computer Simulations: “Badly skewed” or Any FD

• Evaluate and errors to select n

Using the LBGR to Estimate n

212

1

211

2

5.0

Z

AL

ZZn

212

1

211

2

5.016.1

ZAL

ZZn

Page 12: Closing Remarks

12 of 30

Project Planning Documents

Work Plan

Must contain a clear presentation of (and the reasoning behind):

DQO Report FSP Quality Assurance Project Plan HSP

Page 13: Closing Remarks

13 of 30

Project Planning Documents

• General project decision goals

• More detailed, technical project goals/decision rules (DQOs), that will guide project decision-making

• Goals for data quality (MQOs)

• How sampling representativeness will be ensured, and how sampling uncertainty will be controlled

• List of analytical technologies and methods

• QC protocols and criteria to demonstrate that data of known quality will be generated

• Description how data will be assessed and interpreted according to the decision rules

Page 14: Closing Remarks

14 of 30

Analytical +

Sub-sampling +

Natural heterogeneity of the site=

Total Uncertainty

Uncertainty is Additive!Remember the uncertainty is additive for

all steps in sampling and analysis

Page 15: Closing Remarks

15 of 30

Keys to success– Sound technical basis– Complete and thorough documentation

Do it!Do it!(Get the job done - right)

Prove it!Prove it!(Document what/why/how)

SiteClosed

Page 16: Closing Remarks

16 of 30

FINAL EXAM

• What is the Question?

What is the DQO Process in a Nutshell?

• What is the Population?

• What is the Confidence required?

Page 17: Closing Remarks

17 of 30

TRIAD: Systematic PlanningManaging Uncertainty for Environmental Decision Making

Systematic Planning in Environmental Decision Making

http://www.doe.hanford.gov/dqo

Sebastian Tindall

Bechtel Hanford Inc.

3350 George Washington Way

Richland, WA 99352

(509) 372-9195

[email protected]

Page 18: Closing Remarks

18 of 30

TRIAD: Dynamic Work PlansA Guideline

for

Dynamic Workplans and Field Analytics:

The Keys to Cost-Effective Site Characterization and Cleanup

http://cluin.org/char1_edu.cfm#dyna_work

Albert Robbat, Jr.

Tufts University, Chemistry Department

Center for Field Analytical Studies and Technology

Medford, Massachusetts, 02155

tel: 617-627-3474 and fax: 617-627-3443

Page 19: Closing Remarks

19 of 30

TRIAD: On-Site AnalysisApplying the Concept of Effective Data to Environmental

Analyses for Contaminated Sites

http://cluin.org/

Deana M. Crumbling, M.S.

Technology Innovation Office

U.S Environmental Protection Agency

401 M Street, SW, Mail Code 5102G

Washington, DC 20460

(703) 603-0643

[email protected]

Page 20: Closing Remarks

20 of 30

Sampling for

Environmental Activities

Charles “Chuck” Ramsey

EnviroStat, Inc.,P.O. Box 636

Fort Collins, CO 80522-0636

(970) 689-5700; Fax: (970) 229-9977

[email protected]

Page 21: Closing Remarks

21 of 30

DQO Consultants:Preparation & Facilitation

Mitzi Miller

Environmental Quality Management (EQM)1777 Terminal Drive

Richland, WA 99352

(509) 946-4985; Fax: (509) 946-4595

[email protected]

Page 22: Closing Remarks

22 of 30

DQO Consultants:Preparation & Facilitation

Al Robinson

Environmental Quality Management (EQM)1777 Terminal Drive

Richland, WA 99352

(509) 946-4985; Fax: (509) 946-4595

[email protected]

Page 23: Closing Remarks

23 of 30

DQO Consultants:Environmental Statistics

Jim Davidson

Davidson and Davidson, Inc.8390 Gage Blvd., Suite 205

Kennewick, WA 99336

(509) 374-4498;

[email protected]

Page 24: Closing Remarks

24 of 30

DOE EM-5/NAMP Sponsored Web Pages

http:/www.hanford.gov/dqo/

http://dqo.pnl.gov/

http://www.em.doe.gov/safetyhealth/3d/

Page 25: Closing Remarks

25 of 30

DQO Training Points of Contact

DQO Process Expert Sebastian Tindall

Program ManagerBechtel Hanford Inc.

3350 George Washington WayRichland, WA 99352

(509) [email protected]

Visual Sample PlanJames R. Davidson, Jr.

Davidson and Davidson, Inc.8390 Gage Blvd., Suite 205

Kennewick, WA 99336Tel: (509) [email protected]

Page 26: Closing Remarks

26 of 30

Program POCsElizabeth M. Bowers

Department of Energy/Richland Operations Office

825 Jadwin AvenueRichland, WA 99352

(509) [email protected]

Dave BottrellDepartment of Energy/EM-5/NAMP

19901 Germantown RoadCloverleaf Building

Room 1078Germantown, MD 20874-1290

(301) 903-7251 [email protected]

Sebastian TindallProgram Manager

Bechtel Hanford Inc. 3350 George Washington Way

Richland, WA 99352(509) 372-9195

[email protected]

Brent PulsipherProgram Manager

Pacific Northwest National Laboratories.

2400 Stevens DriveRichland, WA 99352

(509) 375-3989 [email protected]

Page 27: Closing Remarks

27 of 30

Day 2 Training Credits

• Susan Blackburn, SAIC, Richland, WA• Dave Blumenkranz, SAIC, Richland, WA• Mitzi Miller, EQM, Richland, WA & Knoxville, TN• Al Robinson, EQM, Richland, WA • Kelly Black, Neptune and Associates, Denver, CO• Candy Hawk, Blue Sky Software, Richland, WA• Mike Schwab, Bechtel Hanford, RL, WA• Surajit Amrit, Bechtel Hanford, RL, WA

Page 28: Closing Remarks

28 of 30

VSP Acknowledgements

John Wilson, PNNL

Dick Gilbert, Nancy Hassig, Tim Schiebe, PNNL

Don Singer, USGS

Brent Pulsipher, PNNL

Page 29: Closing Remarks

29 of 30

How Many Samples do I Need?

REMEMBER:

HETEROGENEITY

IS THE RULE!

Page 30: Closing Remarks

30 of 30

End of Day 2 Course

Please take a few minutes to fill out and turn in all the

course evaluation forms.

Thank you for your attention today.

Questions? Feedback?


Recommended