23
Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School District Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education Coordinator
| Date post: | 31-Mar-2015 |
| Category: |
Documents |
| Upload: | elissa-calland |
| View: | 218 times |
| Download: | 3 times |
Closing the Achievement Gap in Park City School
District
Nicole Todd, Ph.D. Special Education Coordinator
PC out-performs State
Spring 05 Spring 06 Spring 07 Spring 08 Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 12 Spring 13 Spring 14 Spring 150%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elementary Language Arts CRT
Park City State
% Proficient
PC out-performs comparable districts
01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elementary Language Arts CRT
District 1 PC District 2
% P
rofic
ient
Changing Demographics…
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
PCSD Annual Increase in Hispanic Students
# of
Hisp
anic
stud
ents
Elementary Schools 12-13
• School 1: 343 Total: 54% Hispanic, 48% FRL
• School 2: 590 Total: 24% Hispanic, 19% FRL
• School 3: 498 Total: 17% Hispanic, 12% FRL
• School 4: 528 Total: 14% Hispanic, 11% FRL
Are we happy with our data?
PC’s LEP students not outperforming state
Spring 05 Spring 06 Spring 070%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elementary Language Arts CRT LEP students
Park City State
LEP not out-performing comparable districts
01-02 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-070%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Elementary Language Arts CRT LEP students
District 1 PC District 2
Disaggregated data revealed issues that needed to be addresses
• Bi-monthly meetings with Curriculum, Student Services, and Elementary Principals– Why the Achievement Gap?• Tier 1 Instruction varied widely• Instruction not aligned with best practice• “Your kids, my kids”• Too many interventions, providers, poor fidelity• Lots of resources were not solving the problem
The steps- Tier 1
• Grade Level Team Meetings• Comprehensive SIOP PD for all staff• Comprehensive SIOP PD for every
administrator and coach• SIOP model teacher cohorts
The steps- Tiers 2 & 3
• Interventions and the Problem Solving Model• Standard Protocol Committee• Track interventions in SIS
The steps- Additionally
• After School Programs• 6-week Summer School• Family Literacy• District-wide Preschool
Our Results…
• As a result of these efforts, we are seeing the data turn in the right direction.
LEP as compared to State Average
Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Language Arts CRT - Grades 3-5 LEP
State PC
% P
rofic
ient
PC LEP students exceeding comparable districts
Spring 09 Spring 10 Spring 11 Spring 120%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Language Arts CRT - Grades 3-5 LEP
District 1 PC District 2
% P
rofic
ient
Currently…
Tier 1 Focus: Journeys, Math Adoption, SIOP PD
Tier 3 Focus: Reading InterventionsDistrict-wide Preschool
Tier 1 Focus:Journeys
Math AdoptionSIOP
Are we keeping kids at benchmark?
% of students at Benchmark BOY that are at Benchmark EOY
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%60%70%80%90%
100%
83%
94% 92% 94% 96% 94%99% 97%
90%
KINDER
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%60%70%80%90%
100%
86% 85% 83%77%
83% 86%91% 91%
85%
1ST GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
95%90%
94% 92% 93% 92% 92% 90% 92%
2ND GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
88% 90% 91% 90% 93% 90%99% 96% 97%
3RD GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%
100%
94% 96% 96% 95% 97% 96% 96% 97% 97%
4TH GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-1350%55%60%65%70%75%80%85%90%95%
100%
93%97% 96% 97% 98% 98% 97% 97% 97%
5TH GRADE
Tier 3 Reading Interventions Established
Are we moving kids from intensive?
% of students at Intensive BOY that move out of Intensive at EOY
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%
20%40%60%80%
100%
56% 62%81%
69% 77%86% 94% 91% 92%
KINDER
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%
20%40%60%80%
100%
47%
26% 34% 28% 33% 30%
57% 50%59%
1ST GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13 AVERAGE0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
29%
11% 11% 10% 6%
23%
53%
35%42%
2ND GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
37% 31% 35% 33% 35%21%
40% 44% 40%
3RD GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
33%45% 40% 42%
22%
42%52%
39%
63%
4TH GRADE
04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12 12-130%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
40%25% 31%
18% 22% 20%
40% 38%24%
5TH GRADE
District-wide Preschool Implementation
Preschool impacting KindergartenFewer kids entering at Intensive
09-10 10-11 11-12 12-13*0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
60%75%
40%28%
BOY Dibel's Kindergarten - Hispanic Students
Benchmark Strategic Intensive
