+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Closing the Brand Response

Closing the Brand Response

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: manuel-jaen
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
3
16 Admap September 2003 © World Advertising Research Center 2003 T HE ACCEPTED DEFINI TION of a straight line is ‘the shortest dis- tance between two points’. Companies marketing a product or service in the US have lost touch with that simple truth. Typically, marketers follow a costly, circuitous route from the act of establishing brand identity to building a profitable customer relation- ship. The majority of marketers choose to stay with the one-way advertising model of a bygone era. What a pity, when mak- ing a beeline straight to starting a consumer relationship is as simple as using the direct-response tools that are the foundation of today’s database-driven marketing excellence. At the heart of the problem is a discon- nection between the focus on brand and the focus on response that drives 21st-cen- tury interactive customer relationships. This article looks at the benefits gained from closing that brand/response gap by using brand-building advertising to elicit a response that leads to fully accountable results. ‘Connectivity’ (shrinking the brand/response gap) is the primary chal- lenge faced by marketers in the first decade of this century. ‘Fixation on brand’ paralysis We know that over time everything changes and evolves to higher life forms. Right? Wrong. At least as it applies to the advertising life form. The fixation on traditional awareness advertising and brand identity has changed little in 40 years, while almost every other aspect of marketing has evolved into more com- plex and effective business practices. The result is a massive gap between brand and response, with dire implica- tions. Below is a brief look at life in the fast lane of today’s marketing in the US. The customer is a moving target. Com- munications are delivered on prime-time network TV , on cable, on web banners and pop-ups, at construction sites, over cell phones, on street pavements and in rest- rooms. Single-channel distribution is no more. It is a multi-channel world and then some. At shopping malls, by mail, in cyberspace, by cell and hardwire tele- marketing, at kiosks, on a handheld Palm Pilot, at concerts, ballparks, wherever and whenever. Empowerment is in the hands of the consumer. Shoppers control the rela- tionship. In the US, eight out of ten shoppers turn to the net to make a deci- sion before going to the automotive showroom. They tell FedEx at what time and at what cost to deliver the package. They compare prices and user ratings before buying anything and everything, over the net. Sixty million people sell to one another on eBay. Competition is carried to the extreme. Today’s supplier is tomorrow’s competi- tor. Gillette spent 750 million dollars developing the Mach 3 blade. One year later, a major UK supermarket developed the same product under its own brand name. Colleges offer their own credit cards that compete with those of local banks. Banks compete with financial advisers to sell stocks and bonds. Finan- cial advisers prepare your taxes to compete with local certified public accountants. The fragmentation of media has no limit, with 500 TV channels delivering to ever smaller and more selective mini- markets. Attention is splintered as web surfers chat with their friends via email, play on the Xbox, talk on the cell phone and have the TV set blaring – all at the same time. There is a non-stop bombardment of the mind and the senses. This over-stimu- lation results in a stressed-out consumer. As the magazine Science reports: stress floods the brain with hormones called glucocortoids that interferes with the transfer of short-term memory to long- term memory storage. That is bad news for marketers. The more messages put out, the more we suppress the consumer’s ability to remember those messages. The answer: close the gap A brand is no longer defined only by advertising-driven perception. Rather it is defined by the customer’s experience in buying the product; satisfaction in using the product; and the services wrapped around the product with positive conse- quences. As important as brand perception is the nature of the brand experience, the ease of reading ‘how to’ guides, the quality Andrew Cohen, Exposed Brick, argues that cost-effective, successful marketing today demands a balanced combination of brand building and response generation C losing the brand / response gap brandstrategy The further the gap, the … weaker the brand experience benefit weaker the return on marketing investment weaker the media-buying efficiency greater the ‘opportunity cost’ in lost market data greater the chance of customer conquest by competitors greater the risk of non-accountability. Brand Response Forces closing the gap will… increase the likelihood of obtaining useful customer feedback add value to the prospect and cus- tomer relationship allow instantaneous, technology- enabled transactions and interactions encourage expansion into multi- channel marketing. Brand Response
Transcript

8/3/2019 Closing the Brand Response

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/closing-the-brand-response 1/316 Admap September 2003 © World Advertising Research Center 2003

THE ACCEPTED DEFINITION of astraight line is ‘the shortest dis-tance between two points’.

Companies marketing a product orservice in the US have lost touch withthat simple truth. Typically, marketersfollow a costly, circuitous route from theact of establishing brand identity tobuilding a profitable customer relation-ship.

The majority of marketers choose tostay with the one-way advertising modelof a bygone era. What a pity, when mak-ing a beeline straight to starting aconsumer relationship is as simple asusing the direct-response tools that arethe foundation of today’s database-drivenmarketing excellence.

At the heart of the problem is a discon-

nection between the focus on brand andthe focus on response that drives 21st-cen-tury interactive customer relationships.This article looks at the benefits gainedfrom closing that brand/response gap byusing brand-building advertising to elicita response that leads to fully accountableresults.

‘Connectivity’ (shrinking thebrand/response gap) is the primary chal-lenge faced by marketers in the firstdecade of this century.

‘Fixation on brand’ paralysisWe know that over time everythingchanges and evolves to higher life forms.Right?

Wrong. At least as it applies to theadvertising life form. The fixation ontraditional awareness advertising andbrand identity has changed little in 40years, while almost every other aspect of marketing has evolved into more com-plex and effective business practices.

The result is a massive gap betweenbrand and response, with dire implica-tions.

Below is a brief look at life in the fastlane of today’s marketing in the US. The customer is a moving target. Com-munications are delivered on prime-timenetwork TV, on cable, on web banners and

pop-ups, at construction sites, over cellphones, on street pavements and in rest-rooms. Single-channel distribution is no more.It is a multi-channel world and thensome. At shopping malls, by mail, incyberspace, by cell and hardwire tele-marketing, at kiosks, on a handheld PalmPilot, at concerts, ballparks, wherever andwhenever. Empowerment is in the hands of theconsumer. Shoppers control the rela-tionship. In the US, eight out of ten

shoppers turn to the net to make a deci-sion before going to the automotiveshowroom. They tell FedEx at what timeand at what cost to deliver the package.They compare prices and user ratingsbefore buying anything and everything,over the net. Sixty million people sell toone another on eBay. Competition is carried to the extreme.Today’s supplier is tomorrow’s competi-tor. Gillette spent 750 million dollarsdeveloping the Mach 3 blade. One yearlater, a major UK supermarket developed

the same product under its own brandname. Colleges offer their own creditcards that compete with those of localbanks. Banks compete with financialadvisers to sell stocks and bonds. Finan-cial advisers prepare your taxes to

compete with local certified public

accountants.The fragmentation of media has no

limit, with 500 TV channels delivering toever smaller and more selective mini-markets. Attention is splintered as websurfers chat with their friends via email,play on the Xbox, talk on the cell phoneand have the TV set blaring – all at thesame time. There is a non-stop bombardment of the mind and the senses. This over-stimu-lation results in a stressed-out consumer.As the magazine Science  reports: stress

floods the brain with hormones calledglucocortoids that interferes with thetransfer of short-term memory to long-term memory storage. That is bad newsfor marketers. The more messages putout, the more we suppress the consumer’sability to remember those messages.

The answer: close the gapA brand is no longer defined only byadvertising-driven perception. Rather it isdefined by the customer’s experience inbuying the product; satisfaction in using

the product; and the services wrappedaround the product with positive conse-quences.

As important as brand perception isthe nature of the brand experience, theease of reading ‘how to’ guides, the quality

Andrew Cohen, Exposed Brick, argues that cost-effective, successful marketing todaydemands a balanced combination of brand building and response generation

Closing the brand/response gap

brandstrategy

The further the gap, the …

weaker the brand experience benefit

weaker the return on marketing

investment

weaker the media-buying efficiency

greater the ‘opportunity cost’ in lostmarket data

greater the chance of customer

conquest by competitors

greater the risk of non-accountability.

Brand Response

Forces closing the gap will…

increase the likelihood of obtaining

useful customer feedback

add value to the prospect and cus-

tomer relationship

allow instantaneous, technology-

enabled transactions and interactions

encourage expansion into multi-

channel marketing.

Brand Response

8/3/2019 Closing the Brand Response

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/closing-the-brand-response 2/3September 2003 • Admap 17© World Advertising Research Center 2003

straight line connecting brand andresponse by adopting the mantra ‘Expe-rience is the brand.’

The benefits of closing the gapA recent demonstration of the benefitsof connecting brand and response wasthe introduction of OxiClean withdirect response advertising in the US.Traditionally, the fast-moving consumergoods (fmcg) industry resists the integra-tion of brand and response. It loves tobuild brand recognition with ‘creative’advertising that establishes an emotionalconnection without engaging theprospect or customer in any direct way.The success of OxiClean showed, onceagain, that it doesn’t have to be that way.

Fmcg advertisers adhere to marketing

strategies built on brand mass marketingfounded in the 1950s. OxiClean provedthat a brand/response strategy is a perfectfit for the 21st century.

OxiClean, an unknown company atthe time, was introduced with an adver-tising budget one-tenth the size of otherFmcg companies and a complete lack of 

presence on retail shelves. OxiClean wenthead to head against all the top brands inits category – Tide, Cheer, Clorox – andcame out in a leadership position. Howdid it do it?

At first OxiClean was sold only directvia street markets, direct-response TV andon an e-commerce website. Withoutdoing anything ‘right’, OxiClean built anational brand name, a loyal followingand a significant profit.

The early success was followed by amulti-channel strategy and the start of distribution via non-grocery retail stores.Sales were driven by a brand/responseadvertising strategy that cut through theadvertising clutter of its competitors.

OxiClean used a memorablespokesperson, a daring product claim and

a convincing demonstration to register itsbrand identity and build a customer data-base. The brand/response strategy allowedOxiClean to motivate response and buildbrand loyalty simultaneously. It closed thegap between brand and response – andlaughed all the way to the bank.

At the opposite end of the marketing

of the customer communications, thevoice of the representative at the otherend of the phone line, the ease of findinginformation at the company website, andso on. In the new marketing world domi-nated by ease of access, ‘the experience’takes precedence over ‘the perception’.Building a tight emotional connection tothe brand is no longer the sole province of a 30-second commercial.

Jet Blue, with little advertising, built aclose bond with customers by demon-strating that flying can be an economicaland enjoyable experience. What they dofor you creates the brand image – not a 30-second commercial. It is the same withAmazon – the promise is an easy, hassle-free way to shop on the net at a discount.And they deliver. No brand advertising

required. The same is true for Wal-Mart,eBay, Red Bull.

These super-brands of the marketingworld have shown that advertising isjust one aspect of the multitude of con-nections that build an emotionalattachment to a product or service intoday’s world. These companies draw a

Andrew Cohen is founder of

Exposed Brick, a marketing

consulting firm working with

many blue-chip companies.

He is currently co-authoring

with Stan Rapp, Business

Magic; Making the Impossible

Possible in Business and Life.

Get a response: OxiClean succeeded with the brand/response strategy, a far cry from the 1950s style of mass marketing shown here

8/3/2019 Closing the Brand Response

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/closing-the-brand-response 3/318 Admap • September 2003

brandresearch

scale from fmcg companies we find thetitans of the automotive world. At thehead of the pack in sales and advertisingexpenditure stands General Motors (GM).So it is interesting to note how GM closedthe gap between brand and response toproduce a 55% jump in market share forthe Corsa brand in Argentina.

In this case, a 30-second brand-response commercial was run in tandemwith a 30-second direct-response versionof the same message. All of it happened inprime time. The result? The phones didn’tstop ringing and the cars flew out of theshowroom at one of the worst times everfor the Argentine economy.

The magic of OPCOne method for connecting brand andresponse effectively in an ad campaign iscalled the OPC model. Developed by thisauthor, used by Global Fortune 1000 com-

panies and tested in seven differentlanguages, this technique has generatedover a billion and a half dollars in directsales while simultaneously building majorbrands. The basic premise is that a pur-chase can be achieved only if an offer (O),product (P) and call to action (C) are unitedin a compelling advertising presentation.

The key component of the OPC modelis the brand/response (B/R) ratio; repre-senting the relative emphasis put onbrand and response.

This is how it works. Traditionally, TVadvertising for an fmcg brand has no offeror call to action in the awareness advertis-ing. The B/R ratio in this instance wouldbe expressed as 100/0. The effectiveness of the advertising is dependent on theconsumer remembering the product’spositioning benefit and reacting accord-ingly at the point of sale.

When OxiClean came on the scene, itwiped out the competition with a 30/70B/R ratio. As OxiClean expanded intotraditional retail and built sales throughmultiple channels it chose to shift itsmarketing B/R ratio to 60/40, and growthcontinued.

In Argentina, General Motors dramati-cally gained market share with a 50/50

B/R ratio. When its advertising revertedto the usual automotive 100/0 B/R ratio,the gain faded away.

The B/R ratio is a metaphor for the linethat connects brand with response. Intraditional fmcg and automotive adver-tising, the 100/0 B/R ratio reflects the lackof initiating an immediate contact orsale. Traditional direct marketers, totallyfocused on maximising response, arefamous for high-powered 0/100 B/R thatpushes for a sale for up to 120 seconds oncable TV in the US. Now, a new genera-

tion of ‘direct mass marketers’, wise tothe power of building a brand connec-tion while going for intermediateinteraction, win big with a 40/60 B/Rratio in 60-second and even 30-second TVcommercials.

The next steps you can takeWe have discussed the evolution of theforces closing the gap between brand andresponse. But closing the gap often involvesthe challenge of unifying different disci-plines and competing egos. Professor Philip

Kotler, whose name is synonymous withmarketing wisdom in America, suggeststhat companies begin by making a singleindividual responsible for managing andintegrating all the company’s communica-tions. This puts a singular vision at all the

contact points where a consumer mayencounter the brand.

Designating such a person is just the

first step. Successful unification of brandand response is also about the incentivesused to encourage co-operation betweencompeting marketing disciplines. It isabout creating diversified teams that ‘own’the account; including specialists in brandadvertising, response advertising, webdevelopment and experiential promotion.

It is helpful, too, to drop the misleadingterm ‘integration’ (as it relates to distinctlydifferent forms of expertise), and explorenew terms such as unification and collab-orative marketing. The idea is to do away

with folding any one marketing disciplineinto another. Experience has shown thatintegration usually involves the ‘estab-lishment’ discipline absorbing thechallenger, with the outcome a disaster forthe marketer paying the bill.

In today’s tech-driven, data-based, rela-tionship marketing world, any companythat resists going straight to the con-sumer by closing the gap between brandand response will pay a huge price in losteffectiveness and efficiency. The only wayto go is the shortest B/R distance to

reaching a profitable connection withprospects and customers.Why would anyone want to do things

differently in this, the Age of Access? ■

[email protected] .

© World Advertising Research Center 2003

‘In today’s tech-driven, data-based,

relationshipmarketing world,any company thatresists going straightto the consumer byclosing the gapbetween brand andresponse will pay ahuge price in losteffectiveness andefficiency’

Closing the gap will …

strengthen brand message

maximise media efficiencies –particularly mass-media TV

increase relevance of the advertisingmessage

obtain cost-free, vital marketing datamaximise returns on marketing

investment and accountability convert ‘passive viewers’ into ‘active

buyers’.

Brand Response


Recommended