Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | dwight-gregory |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 4 times |
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
11
Growth and Structure of Thin Fe Films on the Ti-Al Interface
Growth and Structure of Thin Fe Films on the Ti-Al Interface
C. V. RamanaC. V. Ramana
Montana State UniversityMontana State Universityhttp://www.physics.montana.edu/Ionbeams/ionbeams.htmlhttp://www.physics.montana.edu/Ionbeams/ionbeams.html
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
22
Stabilizing Metal-Metal Interfaces
• Metal thin film devices have layers ~ nm thicknessMetal thin film devices have layers ~ nm thickness• Diffusion occurs frequently: interface ~ nm thickDiffusion occurs frequently: interface ~ nm thick• Need to stabilize the interface, provide a template for Need to stabilize the interface, provide a template for
epitaxial growth, minimize interdiffusion epitaxial growth, minimize interdiffusion • Applications: magnetoresistive devices, spin electronicsApplications: magnetoresistive devices, spin electronics
• Surface energy (broken bonds)Surface energy (broken bonds)
• Chemical formation energyChemical formation energy
• Strain energyStrain energy A
Binterface
Smith et al, Appl. Surf. Sci. 219 (2003) 28
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
33
Experiment
• Substrate: Substrate: Al(100)Al(100)• Metal overlayers:Metal overlayers:
• FeFe • Ti Ti • Surface energy > Al surface energySurface energy > Al surface energy• Form Al compounds with Form Al compounds with HHformform < 0 < 0
• Use resistively heated wires ( ~ML/min)Use resistively heated wires ( ~ML/min)• Deposition at room temperatureDeposition at room temperature
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
44
Techniques and GoalsTechniques and Goals
• Rutherford backscattering and channeling (RBS/c)Rutherford backscattering and channeling (RBS/c)• Low-energy electron diffraction (LEED)Low-energy electron diffraction (LEED)• Low-energy ion scattering (LEIS)Low-energy ion scattering (LEIS)
Fe
Ti
Al
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
55
Overview of Rutherford Backscattering and Channeling
• MeV HeMeV He++ ions ions• Yield = Q Yield = Q (Nt) (Nt)• Fe (Ti) peak for coverageFe (Ti) peak for coverage• Al peak for structureAl peak for structure250 300 350 400 450
0
100
200
500 600 700 800 900
X 1/4
1 MeV He+ Ions Normal Incidence
Scattering Angle: 105o
Al(100) + 2 ML Ti + 3 ML Fe
Ti
Fe
Ion
Yie
ld (
Cou
nts)
Channel Number
Backscattered Ion Energy (KeV)
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
66
Fe Growth on Al(100) – Does Ti Interlayer Makes Any Difference?Fe Growth on Al(100) – Does Ti Interlayer Makes Any Difference?
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140
3
6
9
12
15
18
21
24
27
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22 Fe Growth on Al(100) + Ti
1 MeV He+, Normal Incidence, =105o
No Ti 1 ML Ti 2 ML Ti Simulation
Vis
ible
Al A
tom
s (1
015 a
tom
s/cm
2 )
Fe Coverage (1015 atoms/cm2)
Fe Coverage (Monolayers)
Vis
ible
Al A
tom
s (M
on
ola
yers
)
Ramana et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 66101
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
77
Fe-Fe ShadowingFe-Fe Shadowing
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 2 4 6 8 10
0
2
4
6
8
10Fe on 2 ML Ti + Al(100)
Fe
Co
vera
ge
(1
015 a
tom
s/cm
2 )
Fe Coverage (1015 atoms/cm2)
Random Aligned
Fe
Co
vera
ge
(M
on
ola
yers
)
Fe Coverage (Monolayers)
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
88
Angular Ion Yield Curves Angular Ion Yield Curves
0o
FCC Al
45o
FCC Fe
[010]
[100]
If it is fcc Fe
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
99
Angular Ion Yield Curves Cont…Angular Ion Yield Curves Cont…
FCC Al
45o
[010]
[100]
54.7o
BCC Fe
If it is bcc Fe
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1010
Structure of Fe: Off-Normal Ion Channeling MeasurementsStructure of Fe: Off-Normal Ion Channeling Measurements
42 43 44 45 46 47 48
2.0x103
4.0x103
6.0x103
8.0x103
SimulationExperiment
Al Fe Polynomial Fit
Angle (Degrees)
Bac
ksca
ttere
d Io
n Yi
eld
(Cou
nts)
5
10
15
20
25
Al Fe Polynomial Fit
Angular Ion Yield H
itting Probability (M
L)
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1111
Structure of Fe contd..Structure of Fe contd..
53 54 55 56 57
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
Al, Experiment Fe, Experiment Polynomial Fit Fe, Simulation Polynomial Fit
Angular Ion Yield
No
rma
lize
d Y
ield
Angle (Degrees)
θmin = 54.55o
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1212
Lattice Parameters & CalculationsLattice Parameters & Calculations
c)TiAl: Tetragonala = 4.0155 Åc = 4.0625 Å
a) Fe: bcc2.8665 Å
b) Al: fcc (4.0496)2.8635 Å
Lattice Parameters
2.8560 Å
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1313
Unrelaxed bcc FeUnrelaxed bcc Fe
54.74o
Volume is conservedVFe = CFe A = CFe X2
CFe = (2.8665)3/X2
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1414
Fe (bcc) relaxed to Al substrateFe (bcc) relaxed to Al substrate
θ
54.74o
θ
54.65o
θ = tan-1(X / CFe )
Volume is conservedVFe = CFe A = CFe X2
CFe = (2.8665)3/X2
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1515
Fe (bcc) relaxing to Ti-Al interfaceFe (bcc) relaxing to Ti-Al interface
54.74o
θ
θ
54.44o
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1616
Calculations cont.…Calculations cont.…
XX CCFeFe θ
FeFe 2.86652.8665 -- 54.7454.74
AlAl 2.86352.8635 2.87252.8725 54.6554.65
TiAlTiAl 2.85602.8560 2.88762.8876 54.4454.44
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1717
Why does it work?Why does it work?
• Bimetallic Formation Energies (kJ/mole-atom)Bimetallic Formation Energies (kJ/mole-atom)
Fe/Al: 25Fe/Al: 25 Ti/Al: 38Ti/Al: 38 Fe/Ti: 20Fe/Ti: 20
• Ti-Al bond stronger than Fe-Al or Fe-Ti so Ti prefers to stay Ti-Al bond stronger than Fe-Al or Fe-Ti so Ti prefers to stay near the Al interfacenear the Al interface
• Lattice matching: bcc Fe (100) unit cell has a = 2.86 Lattice matching: bcc Fe (100) unit cell has a = 2.86 ÅÅ
fcc Al (100) has Al-Al distance 2.86 fcc Al (100) has Al-Al distance 2.86 ÅÅ
hcp Ti (0001) has Ti-Ti distance 2.95 hcp Ti (0001) has Ti-Ti distance 2.95 ÅÅ
• Fe (small atom) more easily accommodated by Al(100) than Fe (small atom) more easily accommodated by Al(100) than Ti (larger atom). Formation of Ti-Al interface “stiffens” theTi (larger atom). Formation of Ti-Al interface “stiffens” the
surface, restrains movement of Fe into the substrate.surface, restrains movement of Fe into the substrate.
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1818
Summary and ConclusionSummary and Conclusion
• Demonstrated the use of a metallic interlayer to Demonstrated the use of a metallic interlayer to stabilize a metal-metal interface and promote epitaxial stabilize a metal-metal interface and promote epitaxial growthgrowth
• Fe growth occurs in slightly distorted bcc structure on Fe growth occurs in slightly distorted bcc structure on the Al(100) surface with Ti interlayer at the interface. the Al(100) surface with Ti interlayer at the interface.
CMP Seminar September 22, 2CMP Seminar September 22, 2003003
1919
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Prof. Richard J. SmithProf. Richard J. Smith
• Prof. Bum-Sik Choi (Korea) Prof. Bum-Sik Choi (Korea)
• Ion BeamersIon Beamers
• NSF (DMR-0077534)NSF (DMR-0077534)