+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CMU - FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS: EFFICIENCY, SECURITY, … · NOx Emitted (lb/min) GE Document...

CMU - FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS: EFFICIENCY, SECURITY, … · NOx Emitted (lb/min) GE Document...

Date post: 30-Jan-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
28
1 Incorporating Wind into a Natural-gas Turbine Baseload Power System Increases NO x and CO 2 Emissions from the Gas Turbines CMU - FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS: EFFICIENCY, SECURITY, CONTROL Warren Katzenstein and Dr. Jay Apt [email protected] [email protected] March 11th, 2008
Transcript
  • 1

    Incorporating Wind into a Natural-gas Turbine Baseload Power System Increases NOx and CO2 Emissions from the Gas Turbines

    CMU - FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS: EFFICIENCY, SECURITY, CONTROL

    Warren Katzenstein and Dr. Jay Apt

    [email protected]@cmu.edu

    March 11th, 2008

  • 22

    Today I will discuss

    • Background and Motivation• Research Question• Approach

    – Actual wind data– Actual emissions data from two types of natural-gas turbines

    • Model Construction– General Electric LM6000 turbine– Siemens-Westinghouse 501FD turbine

    • Results• Implications

  • 3

    Renewables Portfolio Standards

    State Goal

    ☼ PA: 18%¹ by 2020☼ NJ: 22.5% by 2021

    CT: 23% by 2020

    MA: 4% by 2009 +1% annual increase

    WI: requirement varies by utility; 10% by 2015 goal

    IA: 105 MW

    MN: 25% by 2025(Xcel: 30% by 2020)

    TX: 5,880 MW by 2015

    ☼ AZ: 15% by 2025

    CA: 20% by 2010

    ☼ *NV: 20% by 2015

    ME: 30% by 200010% by 2017 - new RE

    State RPS

    ☼ Minimum solar or customer-sited RE requirement* Increased credit for solar or customer-sited RE

    ¹PA: 8% Tier I / 10% Tier II (includes non-renewables)

    HI: 20% by 2020

    RI: 16% by 2020

    ☼ CO: 20% by 2020 (IOUs)*10% by 2020 (co-ops & large munis)

    ☼ DC: 11% by 2022

    DSIRE: www.dsireusa.org September 2007

    ☼ NY: 24% by 2013

    MT: 15% by 2015

    IL: 25% by 2025

    VT: RE meets load growth by 2012

    Solar water heating eligible

    *WA: 15% by 2020

    ☼ MD: 9.5% in 2022

    ☼ NH: 23.8% in 2025

    OR: 25% by 2025 (large utilities)5% - 10% by 2025 (smaller utilities)

    *VA: 12% by 2022

    MO: 11% by 2020

    ☼ *DE: 20% by 2019

    ☼ NM: 20% by 2020 (IOUs)10% by 2020 (co-ops)

    ☼ NC: 12.5% by 2021 (IOUs)10% by 2018 (co-ops & munis)

    ND: 10% by 2015

  • 4

    Intermittent Power

    Time

    Power

    1 Hour 2 Hour

  • 5

    Research Question

    Does operating one or more gas turbines to fill in intermittent wind power result in increased NOx and CO2 emissions compared to full-power steady-state operation of natural-gas turbines?

  • 6

    Approach

    +

    +

    +

    1

    2

    n

    =

    Firm PowerVariable PowerCompensating Power

    Time

    Power

    Gas

    Wind

  • 7

    Approach

    Wind Power Output

    Calculate Power Leveland Ramp Rate Needed

    GT’s Control and Regression Map

    GT Emissions Model

    +-

    Error

    Calculated Emissions

    Ideal Fill Power

    Realized Fill Power

  • 8

    Objective Function for Baseload Plant

  • 9

    Calculating Pollutant Mass Emissions of Baseload Plant

  • 10

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    Time (hours)

    Pow

    er (M

    W)

    Data Slice from Output of Two Wind Farms in Pennsylvania

    Wind Data Obtained

    • Wind Data– Output of 3 existing

    wind farms• Eastern• Southern Great

    Plains• Central Great

    Plains– 1 to 10 seconds

    resolution– 32 total days of data– From anonymous

    source

  • 11

    Gas Turbine Data Obtained• NOx emissions & heat

    rate for 7 CTs & 1 NGCC– 1 minute resolution– Ranges from 38 days of

    data to 135 days of data– CTs are LM6000s– Have

    • Gas flow (HSCFH)• Load (MW)• NOx ppm and lbs• NOx ppm corrected to

    15% O2• O2 %• Heat rate (mBtu/hr)

    – From anonymous source

    90 95 100 105 110 115 1200

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    45

    50

    Time (hours)

    Pow

    er (M

    W)

    Data Slice of Power Output of LM6000 Data Obtained

  • 12

    GE LM6000 – Rated 40-45MW

    Source: www.sealegacy.com Oct. 4th, 2007

  • 13

    CO2 Emissions vs Power for LM6000

    (idle)

  • 14

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50-20

    -15

    -10

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    Power (MW)

    Ram

    p R

    ate

    (MW

    /Min

    )

    LM6000 NOx Emissions as a Function of Power Level and Ramp Rate

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    Model Construction - Regression AnalysisN

    Ox

    Em

    itted (lbs/min)

  • 15

    Region 4

    Region 2

    Region 1

    Region 3

    Idle Power

  • 16

    Siemens-Westinghouse Combined-Cycle Turbine – Rated 200 MW

    www.summitvineyardllc.com

  • 17

    Operating Limit Constraint

    Operating Limit Constraint

  • 18

    CO2 Emissions vs Power for SW 501FD

  • 19

    Siemens-Westinghouse - Regression Analysis

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 2000

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    Power (MW)

    NO

    x E

    mitt

    ed (l

    b/m

    in)

    GE Document GER-3568G

  • Results

  • 21

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50

    10

    20

    30

    40

    Time (hours)

    Pow

    er L

    evel

    s (M

    W)

    Wind + CT Operating Parameters

    Ideal Fill PowerWind PowerActual Fill Power

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5-20

    -10

    0

    10

    20

    Time (hours)

    Ram

    p R

    ate

    (MW

    /min

    )

    Ramp Rates

    Results (1) – LM6000

  • 22

    Expected Emission Reductions Calculation

    ⎥⎥⎦

    ⎢⎢⎣

    −∗= +

    nPenetratioWindMMM

    NaturalGasTotal

    GasNatuarlWindTotalral GasTotal,Natu

    ,

    ,100ReductionEmissionExpected

    %1005.0)5.01(

    100ReductionEmissionExpected,

    =⎥⎥⎦

    ⎢⎢⎣

    ∗−

    ∗=NaturalGasTotal

    ral GasTotal,Natu

    MM

    Example Calculations

    If Wind Penetration is 0.5, then expect MTotal, Wind + NaturalGas = 0.5·MTotal,NaturalGas

    If Wind Penetration is 0.3, then expect MTotal, Wind + NaturalGas = 0.7·MTotal,NaturalGas

    %1003.0)7.01(

    100ReductionEmissionExpected,

    =⎥⎥⎦

    ⎢⎢⎣

    ∗−

    ∗=NaturalGasTotal

    ral GasTotal,Natu

    MM

  • 23

    Expected Emissions ReductionEastern Wind Farm

    6,400 lbs1,500 lbs-240%± 250%

    NOx

    6,968 tons732 tons76%± 1%

    CO2

    501FD (NGCC, DLN)

    1,595 tons176 tons80%± 1%

    CO2

    8,300 lbs290 lbs29%± 4%

    NOxLM6000 (CT)

    Mass Emitted by Wind + NG

    Emissions Reduced

    Expected Emissions Reduction

    Turbine

  • 24

    Expected Emissions Reduction

    -530% + 150% - 5%

    -600% + 100% -75%

    -240% ± 250%

    NOx

    78.9% ± 0.1%

    76.8% ± .2%

    76% ± 1%

    CO2

    501FD (NGCC, DLN)

    77% ± 1%

    77% ± 1%

    80% ± 1%

    CO2

    31% ± 4%

    21% ± 3%

    29% ± 4%

    NOxLM6000 (CT)

    Central Great Plains

    Southern Great Plains

    EasternWind Farm

  • 25

    Generating Smaller Wind Data Sets

    1000 min

    (16.6 hrs)

    +1 min

  • 26

    Implications• 1 MWh of wind energy does not eliminate 1 MWh of emissions• Impacts

    – Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR)• Significant penetration of wind power will make it harder for

    CAIR to achieve emission reduction goals– Emission displacement studies

    • Overestimating the amount emissions are displaced by wind– Life Cycle Analyses

    • Don’t account for wind’s effect of decreasing emission efficiencies of conventional generators

    – Technology• Not all gas turbines are equally suitable for pairing with wind• R&D program to improve emissions of heavily cycled gas

    turbines

  • 27

    AcknowledgementsAllen Robinson, Cliff Davidson, Lester Lave, Mitchell Small

    Anonymous resource for power plant emissions data,

    Anonymous resource for wind data

    Funding CEICNETL CIT Dean’s Fellowship

    Warren [email protected]

    Dr. Jay [email protected]

  • Questions?

    Renewable Portfolio Standard which would require

    electric utilities to obtain 15 percent of their electricity

    from wind, solar, or biomass energy by 2020

    – NYTimes June 15th, 2007

    RPS dsireusa.org C.A.I.R epa.gov

    LA Smog Apt


Recommended