Date post: | 19-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | julius-hancock |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Agenda• Welcome and Introductions• General CAG Updates• CAG Member Updates• Learning Session: Integrating Adolescent Girls into
Multi-Sectoral ProgramsPresentation by Amy Spindler, Adolescent Girl and
Youth Advisor, and Allison Shean, Gender and Resilience Research Officer, of Mercy Corps
• Presentation Q&A• Conclusions
Technical Consultation on Adolescent Girl Engagement
• Held an external stakeholder Technical Consultation on Adolescent Girl Engagement on March 6, 2015 in NYC
• Co-sponsored by the Permanent Missions of Canada, Peru, and Zambia, USAID, and the Working Group on Girls
Technical Consultation on Adolescent Girl Engagement
• Fifty-two participants, eighteen of whom were adolescent girls and young women, attended the daylong consultation
• Participants discussed and generated promising practices, indicators, and tools regarding girl engagement
• Next step is to use the learning from the consultations and e-forums to create an Adolescent Girl Engagement Tool
New Working Groups• CAG Working Groups (WGs) are now task-
focused and time-bound • Each WG will have a manager and work off of
a clear mandate and timeline• Four new working groups will focus on, – Adolescent Girl Engagement Tool– CAG Adolescent Girl Engagement Strategy– CAG Framework and Topical Briefs– USG Adolescent Girls Strategy
New Working Groups, cont…• Adolescent Girl Engagement Tool– Will complete the girl engagement tool and plan its
launch– Non-CAG members will also be asked to participate– Set to begin mid-April and end in late October
• CAG Adolescent Girl Engagement Strategy– Will formulate a strategy for how the CAG can
engage adolescent girls in future activities and operations
– Set to begin mid-April and end in mid-June
New Working Groups cont…
• CAG Framework and Topical Briefs– Will complete the CAG framework and
accompanying one-page topical briefs on health, safety, empowerment, and human rights
– Set to begin in late April and end in late August• USG Adolescent Girls Strategy– Will plan and execute the CAG’s participation in
the formation and launch of the USG’s adolescent girl strategy
– Timeframe is currently unknown
New Working Groups, cont…
If you are interested in leading or participating in one of the working groups, please contact Sacha
at [email protected] as soon as possible.
Member Updates
At this point we would love to hear from members about their current projects, recent publications, upcoming events, or any other
news they wish to share.
Saving and improving lives in the world’s toughest places.Saving and improving lives in the world’s toughest places.
Integrating Girls into Multi-Sectoral Programs
Amy Spindler, Adolescent Girl and Youth Advisor Allison Shean, Gender and Resilience Research Officer
Goal: To reduce insecurity and malnutrition among vulnerable rural populations in Niger.
Case Study: Sawki in Niger
How many of you support programming that:
Specifically targets only adolescent girls.
Integrates girls into a larger program. Food security and/or agriculture Economic development and/or livelihoods Conflict management and/or emergency response Health WASH
EARLY enough to keep girls in school and build their health, social, and economic assets
When to intervene?
In school
Married as a child
Has child
Percent of Guatemalan girls ages 10–19, by outcome
Source: Hallman, K., S. Peracca, J. Catino, M.J. Ruiz. 2005. “Causes of low school achievement and early transition to adulthood in Guatemala.” New York: Population Council.
% of girls 10-14 not in school and not living with either parent in Niger
Highest rates reaching 16.5% in the Zinder
region
Estimated number of girls at the national level is 140,867
Poor health outcomes for children born
from adolescent
moms
Very low rates of school
attendance for girls
School enrollment
for rural girls drops off at age
12/13
Very high rates of
child marriageFirst sex
largely occurs within
marriage
First birth is a high risk
birth
Adolescent girls’ bodies not ready
for childbirth
What are the take-aways?
Adolescent girls emerge as a must-have target group in order to make the greatest impact on their future
children’s nutrition and survival
SO1: Reduce chronic malnutrition among pregnant and lactating women and children under five with an emphasis on children under 2
IR1.1: Pregnant women, mothers and caretakers adopt appropriate nutrition practices during their children’s first 1,000 days
IR1.2: Health centers and other community staff promote and respond efficiently and appropriately to community demand for counseling and care
IR1.3: Adolescents adopt appropriate nutrition practices and healthy timing of first pregnancy
Translating the data into program design
Pre-set MC created
IR1.3: Adolescent girls adopt appropriate nutrition practices and healthy timing of first pregnancy
Target Segment
Activities Gatekeepers Purpose
Girls ages 10-14, unmarried, out of school girls
Safe spaces for girls
Parents, Community and religious leaders
Build their social capital, nutritional practices, inform girls of the risks of child marriage/early birth
Girls ages 15-19, married out of school girls
Safe spaces for girls
Husbands, Mother-in-laws
Build their social capital, discuss contraceptives, negotiation, healthy birth spacing and healthy infant feeding practices, VSLA and functional literacy.
Married young couples
Leader mothers model behavior and support contraception messages
Spouse, leader mothers
Delaying first birth; information on healthy child spacing.
MoH Ensure the GoN provides constant contraceptive supply
Ensure health centers are able to keep up with potential new demand for contraceptives based on education and couples counseling.
Gatekeepers: How did we OPEN the door?
VillageChiefs
CommunityMeetings
Meeting with girls
Meetmentors
Organizegirls into safe spaces
Individual follow-up with skeptics
What is the reality on the ground?
• 2,859 girls participate weekly in safe spaces.
• 115 safe spaces in 56
communities.
• 170 mentors in place.
• “Husband Schools” in partnership with the safe spaces.
• Girls adopting healthy practices (e.g., exclusive breastfeeding).
• Communities changing mindset about early marriage.
• Better understanding of the consequences of early marriage.
• Girls see the value of education and alternative pathways for their life.
• Girls have savings through VSLAs.
• Mentors have gained status in society; girls have advocates.
• Girls have forged friendships and new support networks.
• Girls have improved decision-making in the home.
The challenges• Finding appropriate time and space.
• Husbands originally prohibited girls participation.
• Field agents are primarily male.
• Families want to see tangible benefits.
• Dependence on Gender Advisor as “owner” of safe spaces.
• Mentors need structure and support.
• Objectives in the proposal do not always translate into actual programming, nor does it mean the team has knowledge on how to implement.
RISING Research
Building the evidence base for best practices in girl-centered programs to ensure that they effectively and efficiently improve the lives of girls around the world.
How many of you:
Are involved with research the examines the impact of programming on adolescent girls?
Are interested in tools that help determine program impact on adolescent girls?
Key research questions
• Does content covered in
Sawki’s safe spaces lead to improved health, nutrition and food security outcomes for girls?
• Do we see any additional improvements to outcomes when safe space programming is coupled with livelihood support?
Outcomes of interest
• Health and nutrition knowledge and behavior – Reproductive health
• Confidence and aspirations
• Social capital and access to safety nets
• Income generation and earning ability
• Status and decision-making ability
Research design• Mixed-methods approach• Quantitative study conducted in 18 Sawki
communities– Girl Survey– Household Survey
• Qualitative research with girls, mentors, and gatekeepers
• Opportunity for Randomized Control Trial
Comparison Group
No ongoing programming
Treatment Group I – Safe Space Only
Programming began June 2014
Treatment Group II – Safe Space plus Livelihood
Training
Programming began June 2013
Early 2015 Survey 500 girlsHeads of HH
6 Sawki Communities
250 girlsHeads of HH
6 Sawki Communities
250 girlsHeads of HH
6 Sawki Communties
RANDOM LOTTERY SELECTION WITH COMPARISON GROUP
April 2015 Control Treatment
250 girls do not receive
program
250 girls receive
program
Mid-2016 Survey 250 girlsHeads of HH
250 girlsHeads of HH
250 girls Heads of HH
250 girlsHeads of HH
Qualitative Research • FGDs with adolescent girls• FGDs with gatekeepers – husbands, parents, etc.• FGDs/KIIs with safe space mentors
Quantitative toolsAdolescent Girl Survey
10 modules• HH Assets and Access• Health and Nutrition
– Includes Dietary Diversity
• Confidence and Aspirations• Time Use• Social Capital and Safety Nets• Coping Strategies• Income Sources and
Economic Well-Being• Financial Literacy• Reproductive Health• Decision-making and
Influence
Head of HH Survey6 modules• Program Exposure• Progress Out of Poverty• Shocks and Recovery• Food Consumption and
Insecurity – Household Hunger
Scale– Coping Strategies Index
• Status of Girls• HH Decision-making
Next steps
• Data analysis – spring 2015• RCT begins – spring 2015• Report on initial findings – summer/fall 2015• Follow-up surveys – spring 2016• Qualitative data collection – spring 2016• Final report – summer/fall 2016
Conclusions• A big thank you to all our participants and our
wonderful presenters, Amy Spindler and Allison Shean!
• If you would like more information about CAG-related activities or the working groups, please contact Sacha at [email protected].
• If you would like more information about the learning session, please contact Amy at [email protected].