Coca-Cola ENF Northampton MA DPW

8/3/2019 Coca-Cola ENF Northampton MA DPW

1/42

The City of Northampton

Department of Public Works

Commonwealth of Massachusetts

Executive Office of Environmental Affairs MEPA Office

Environmental Notification Form

Coca-Cola Facility Expansion / Bradford Street Pumping Station

Replacement

September 30, 2010

Prepared By: Submitted By:

Kleinfelder/S E A

Consultants Inc.

City of Northampton

Department of Public Works

Edward S. Huntley, P.E.

125 Locust Street Director Department of Public Works

Coca Cola North

America

Northampton, MA 01060


2/42


3/42

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ENVIRONMENTAL NOTIFICATION FORM

ATTACHMENTS

ATTACHMENT 1 EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS (BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION)

EXHIBIT 2 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION)

EXHIBIT 3 USGS LOCUS MAP

EXHIBIT 4 EXISTING CONDITIONS (COCA-COLA FACILITY)

EXHIBIT 5 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (COCA-COLA FACILITY)

ATTACHMENT 2 E N F CIRCULATION LIST

ATTACHMENT 3 PUBLIC NOTICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

ATTACHMENT 4 M A HISTORIC COMMISSION PROJECTNOTIFICATION FORM (BRADFORD

STREET PUMP STATION)

ATTACHMENT 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT REPORT (COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION)


4/42

Revised 09/09 Comment period is limited. For information call 617-626-1020

Classified - Internal use

Commonwealth of MassachusettsExecutive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs

MEPA Office

EnvironmentalNotification Form

The information requested on this form must be completed to begin MEPA Review in accordance withthe provisions of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act, 301 CMR 11.00.

Project Name: Coca-Cola Expansion / Bradford Street Pump Station Replacement

Street: 45 Industrial Dr

Municipality: Northampton Watershed: Connecticut River

Universal Tranverse Mercator Coordinates: Latitude (pump station): 421949Longitude (pump station): 723755

Estimated commencement date: Oct. 2010 Estimated completion date: Dec. 2011

Approximate cost: $41.5 Million (combined) Status of project design: 75 %completeProponent: City of Northampton DPW

Street: 125 locust Street

Municipality: Northampton State: MA Zip Code: 01060

Name of Contact Person From Whom Copies of this ENF May Be Obtained:Jose Lovell

Firm/Agency: Kleinfelder / S E A Street: 2 Wall Street

Municipality: Manchester State: NH Zip Code: 03101

Phone: 603.623.4400 Fax: 603.623.4401 E-mail:[email protected]

Does this project meet or exceed a mandatory EIR threshold (see 301 CMR 11.03

)?Yes NoHas this project been filed with MEPA before?

Yes (EOEA No. ) NoHas any project on this site been filed with MEPA before?

Yes (EOEA No. ) No

Is this an Expanded ENF (see 301 CMR 11.05(7)) requesting:a Single EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.06(8)) Yes Noa Special Review Procedure? (see 301CMR 11.09) Yes Noa Waiver of mandatory EIR? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes Noa Phase I Waiver? (see 301 CMR 11.11) Yes No

Identify any financial assistance or land transfer from an agency of the Commonwealth, includingthe agency name and the amount of funding or land area (in acres):

Coca-ColaNo financial assistance. No land transfer.

Bradford Street Pump StationMA Housing & Economic Development - MA Opportunity Relocation and Expansion JobsCapital Grant ($1,125,000)

For Office Use OnlyExecutive Office of Energy & Environmental Affairs

EEA No.:

MEPA Analyst:

Phone: 617-626-ENF
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]


5/42

2


Are you requesting coordinated review with any other federal, state, regional, or local agency?

(Specify) No

List Local or Federal Permits and Approvals:

Local Permits and Approvals:Northampton DPW Road Opening Permit (for Bradford Street Pump Station construction to befiled)

Northampton DPW Wastewater Discharge Permit (for Coca-Cola facility expansion)Order of Conditions for buffer zone disturbance (for Coca-Cola facility expansion Approved byNorthampton Conservation Commission MA DEP File# 246-636)Storm Water Management Plan (for Coca-Cola facility expansion approved Jan. 14, 2010 byNorthampton DPW)Major Site Plan Approval (for Coca-Cola facility expansion approved Jan. 14, 2010 by NorthamptonPlanning Board)

Federal Permits and Approvals:NPDES Dewatering General Permit (for Bradford Street Pump Station construction to be filed)

Which ENF or EIR review threshold(s) does the project meet or exceed (see 301 CMR 11.03):

Land Rare Species Wetlands, Waterways, & TidelandsWater Wastewater TransportationEnergy Air Solid & Hazardous WasteACEC Regulations Historical & Archaeological

Resources

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION

Summary of Project Size

& Environmental Impacts

Existing Change Total State Permits &

Approvals

LAND Order of ConditionsSuperseding Order ofConditionsChapter 91 License401 Water QualityCertificationMHD or MDC AccessPermit

Water ManagementAct Permit

New Source Approval

DEP or MWRA

Sewer Connection/Extension PermitOther Permits(including Legislative

Approvals) Specify:MA DEP BWP IW 38

Total site acreage 21.77

New acres of land altered 2.5

Acres of impervious area 15.7 0 15.7

Square feet of new borderingvegetated wetlands alteration

0

Square feet of new otherwetland alteration 0

Acres of new non-water

dependent use of tidelands orwaterways0

STRUCTURES

Gross square footage 456,665 16,200 472,865

Number of housing units 0 0 0

Maximum height (in feet) 38 0 38


6/42

3


TRANSPORTATION

Vehicle trips per day 57 cars, 5trucks (PM

peak hour

traffic)

6 trucks/day,

22% car

increase

70 cars, 11

trucks (PM

peak hour

traffic)

Parking spaces 155 0 155

WATER/WASTEWATER

Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 680,000 220,000 900,000

GPD water withdrawal 680,000 220,000 900,000

GPD wastewater generation/treatment

400,000 200,000 600,000

Length of water/sewer mains(in miles)

0 0 0

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION REPLACEMENT

Summary of Project Size

& Environmental Impacts

Existing Change Total State Permits &

Approvals

LAND Order of ConditionsSuperseding Order ofConditionsChapter 91 License401 Water QualityCertificationMHD or MDC AccessPermit

Water ManagementAct Permit

New Source ApprovalDEP or MWRASewer Connection/Extension Permit

Other Permits(including LegislativeApprovals) Specify:

MA DEP BRP WP 68Treatment Works PlanApproval

Total site acreage 0.092

New acres of land altered 0.022

Acres of impervious area 0.020 0.009 0.029

Square feet of new borderingvegetated wetlands alteration

0

Square feet of new otherwetland alteration

0

Acres of new non-waterdependent use of tidelands orwaterways

0

STRUCTURES

Gross square footage 0 201 201

Number of housing units 0 0 0

Maximum height (in feet) N/A 14 14

TRANSPORTATION

Vehicle trips per day 1 0 1

Parking spaces 3 0 3

WATER/WASTEWATER

Gallons/day (GPD) of water use 0 0 0

GPD water withdrawal 0 0 0

GPD wastewater generation/treatment

600,000* 200,000* 800,000*


7/42

4


Length of water/sewer mains(in miles)

0.002 0.000 0.002

* Estimated maximum daily flow at Bradford Street PS, which conveys flow from Coca Cola and

other sources. Wastewater is being transmitted only. No wastewater generation or treatment

exists or is being proposed at the Bradford Street pump station.

CONSERVATION LAND: Will the project involve the conversion of public parkland or other Article 97 public naturaresources to any purpose not in accordance with Article 97?

Yes (Specify________________________________) No

Will it involve the release of any conservation restriction, preservation restriction, agricultural preservation

restriction, or watershed preservation restriction?

Yes (Specify_________________________________) No

RARE SPECIES: Does the project site include Estimated Habitat of Rare Species, Vernal Pools, Priority Sites ofRare Species, or Exemplary Natural Communities?

Yes (Specify________________________________) No

HISTORICAL /ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Does the project site include any structure, site or districtlisted in the State Register of Historic Place or the inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the

Commonwealth?Yes (Specify____________________) No (Findings from MA Historic Commission pending)

If yes, does the project involve any demolition or destruction of any listed or inventoried historic or archaeologicalresources?

Yes (Specify________________________________) No

AREAS OF CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: Is the project in or adjacent to an Area of CriticalEnvironmental Concern?

Yes (Specify_______________________________) No

PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project description should include (a) a description of the project site,(b) a description of both on-site and off-site alternatives and the impacts associated with each alternative,and (c) potential on-site and off-site mitigation measures for each alternative (You may attach oneadditional page, if necessary.)

Information provided in this Environmental Notification Form pertains to impacts from the construction ofa new Bradford Street Pump Station (Pump Station Project) and the Coca-Cola facility expansion. Thereare two separate Project Sites; one at the Coca-Cola facility and one at the existing Bradford Street PumpStation site.

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSIONa) Project Site Description:

Addition/ Renovation to the existing facility at 45 Industrial Dr. to add two new bottling lines withassociated equipment. All expansion will occur on current property. Addition of wastewaterpretreatment process required to meet local permit discharge limits.

b) Alternatives:No feasible off-site alternatives for process lines. City wastewater treatment system is operating neardesign limits and cannot accommodate additional load, necessitating pretreatment. Therefore,wastewater required pretreatment on-site. Wastewater is too dilute to be feasible to haul off-site toalternate treatment.


8/42

5


c) Mitigation:Facility has redesigned drainage and stormwater retention to accommodate expansion. Wastewaterpretreatment area replaces an asphalt area, no change to pervious area. No further mitigations measuresare required or feasible.

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION REPLACEMENTa) Project Site Description:

The purpose of the Bradford Street Pump Station Replacement Project is to expand the flowconveyance capacity of the existing wastewater pump station to accommodate the proposedexpansion of the Coca-Cola facility located in the Industrial Park of Northampton (see locus plan).Coca-Cola North Americas Northampton production facility is proposing an increase in the flow

discharge limit to their Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit associated with a potential newproduct line that will increase its average daily flow from 350,000 gallons per day (GPD) to400,000 GPD, and increase their maximum daily flow from 400,000 GPD to 600,000 GPD.

The existing Bradford Street Pump Station, which receives and conveys flow discharged from theCoca-Cola production facility, is a wet well and dry pit configuration with duplex pumps in the drypit. The existing Bradford Street Pump Station does not have sufficient hydraulic capacity tohandle the proposed increased flows from the proposed expansion of the Coca-Cola facility.

After conducting an evaluation of alternatives, the replacement of the existing pump station witha new pump station with increased capacity at the existing site was recommended.

b) Alternatives Analysis:Common to each alternative discussed below is a similar pump station configuration to thatshown in Exhibit 2. Three different site locations were evaluated for the new Bradford Streetpump station. Alternatives 2 and 3 include lengths of additional gravity sewer and force mainwhile Alternative 1 requires no additional length of sewer. The no-build alternative was notconsidered as it does not meet the programmatic requirements of the Project. Under the no-buildalternative, the existing Bradford Pump Station would remain as-is, risking failure in the nearfuture causing untreated industrial and residential wastewater SSOs.

Alternative #1 This is the preferred alternative as it is a replacement of the existing pumpstation at the existing site, shown in Exhibit 1, and would minimize environmental impacts to theland and the existing sewer system (least amount of new gravity sewer and force main requiredof the three alternatives). This alternative would also result in the least amount of increase innew impervious area.

Alternative #2 This alternative involves acquiring a small section of privately owned land andbuilding on the 40 Bradford Street parcel just to the north of the existing pump station. Thelocation of the pump station in this alternative is such that additional gravity sewer and forcemain would be required to extend those utilities from the current pump station site, therebyincreasing the total impact to land and sewer when compared with the preferred alternative.There would also be a greater amount of impervious surface created as the proposed site is

undeveloped.

Alternative #3 This alternative includes construction of the new pump station within the City-owned roundabout on Industrial Drive within the Industrial Park. This alternative results in thegreatest amount of new gravity sewer, force main, land disturbance, new impervious surface andcost. Also, the new pump station would not replace the existing pump station, rather it wouldhandle only the flow from the Coca-Cola facility while the existing pump station will remain inservice and be rehabilitated to continue to handle the balance of the existing service flows.


9/42

6


c) Mitigation:The preferred alternative will minimize environmental impacts by redeveloping the existing pumpstation site. Erosion and sedimentation controls including straw bales and filter fabric will be useto control stormwater runoff from the construction areas. Disturbed areas will be loamed andseeded following construction.


10/42

7


LAND SECTION all proponents must fill out this section

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Does the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to land (see 301 CMR 11.03(1)

___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify each threshold:

II. Impacts and Permits (Coca-Cola / Pump Station)A. Describe, in acres, the current and proposed character of the project site, as follows:

Existing Change Total

Coke/PS Coke/PS Coke/PS

Footprint of buildings 10.48/0.000 0.372/0.005 10.86/0.005Roadways, parking, and other paved areas 4.76/0.020 0.06/0.006 4.819/0.026

Other altered areas (landscaping) -- / 0.066 -- / -0.011 -- / 0.055Undeveloped areas 6.531/0.000 0.436/0.000 6.096/0.000

B. Has any part of the project site been in active agricultural use in the last three years?

___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, how many acres of land in agricultural use (with agricultural soils) will beconverted to nonagricultural use?

C. Is any part of the project site currently or proposed to be in active forestry use?___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, please describe current and proposed forestry activities and indicate

whether any part of the site is the subject of a DEM-approved forest management plan:

D. Does any part of the project involve conversion of land held for natural resources purposes inaccordance with Article 97 of the Amendments to the Constitution of the Commonwealth to any

purpose not in accordance with Article 97? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe:

E. Is any part of the project site currently subject to a conservation restriction, preservation

restriction, agricultural preservation restriction or watershed preservation restriction? ___ Yes _X_No; if yes, does the project involve the release or modification of such restriction? ___ Yes _X_ No;

if yes, describe:

F. Does the project require approval of a new urban redevelopment project or a fundamental changein an existing urban redevelopment project under M.G.L.c.121A? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe:

G. Does the project require approval of a new urban renewal plan or a major modification of an

existing urban renewal plan under M.G.L.c.121B? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, describe:

H. Describe the project's stormwater impacts and, if applicable, measures that the project will take

to comply with the standards found in DEP's Stormwater Management Policy:

Impervious area to increase by 2% (approx 0.4 acres). Stormwater runoff will be collected ina newly constructed sediment forebay, infiltration and detention basin before beingdischarged to the city storm sewer. The city storm sewer is tributary to the ConnecticutRiver.

I. Is the project site currently being regulated under M.G.L.c.21E or the Massachusetts

Contingency Plan? Yes ___ No _X_ ; if yes, what is the Release Tracking Number (RTN)?

If the project is site is within the Chicopee or Nashua watershed, is it within the Quabbin, Ware,

orWachusett subwatershed? ___ Yes X_ No; if yes, is the project site subject to regulation underthe Watershed Protection Act? ___ Yes ___ No


11/42

8


J. Describe the project's other impacts on land:

III.. ConsistencyA. Identify the current municipal comprehensive land use plan and the open space plan anddescribe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan(s):

Coca-Cola Facility ExpansionPlant expansion is within an industrial park that is designed for this purpose with Cityutilities in place to support this expansion.

Bradford Street Pump StationThe proposed Project is consistent with the Sustainable Northampton Comprehensive Planand the Open Space and Recreation Plan 2005-2010. The Project under its proposedalternative minimizes the impacts of infrastructure systems as it is a redevelopment projectinvolving the replacement of an aging pump station already in place without a significantincrease in footprint or impervious area. The Project proposes to aid in providing long termeconomic sustainability, security and opportunity as well as providing a positive business

environment by allowing for potential expansion of industrial and commercial uses withinthe Industrial Park of Northampton which will also encourage business development for jobcreation and retention. This Project, as proposed, will promote the economic developmentof Northampton in line with the land use and environmental goals and without considerablenegative impact to any of the remaining goals per the comprehensive plan.

B. Identify the current Regional Policy Plan of the applicable Regional Planning Agency anddescribe the consistency of the project and its impacts with that plan:

Coca-Cola Facility ExpansionIndustrial/commercial growth that this expansion will provide is consistent with the PioneerValley Planning Commissions Regional Policy Plan Valley Vision 2 (VV2).

Bradford Street Pump StationThe Project, under its proposed alternative, is consistent with the Pioneer Valley PlanningCommissions Regional Policy Plan Valley Vision 2 (VV2). As a redevelopment the Projectconforms to the land use goals by keeping the same approximate footprint for wastewaterinfrastructure. It promotes commercial and industrial development in line with the VV2 byincreasing the capacity of a designated industrial area to allow for more dense industrialgrowth within the designated area. A direct result of this Project will be that Coca-Cola willbe able to move forward with an already approved expansion within its current parcelcreating additional jobs without any loss of open space. This Project does not hinder theprogress of any of the stated goals in the VV2.

C. Will the project require any approvals under the local zoning by-law or ordinance (i.e. text or mapamendment, special permit, or variance)? Yes ___ No ___ ; if yes, describe:

Not Applicable

D. Will the project require local site plan or project impact review?_X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe:

City of Northampton Zoning approval and City of Northampton ConservationCommission approval have been received.


12/42

9


RARE SPECIES SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to rare species or habitat (see301 CMR 11.03(2))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to rare species or habitat? ___ Yes _X_No

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wetlands, Waterways, andTidelands Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainderof the Rare Species section below.

II. Impacts and PermitsA. Does the project site fall within Priority or Estimated Habitat in the current MassachusettsNatural Heritage Atlas (attach relevant page)? ___ Yes ___ No. If yes,

1. Which rare species are known to occur within the Priority or Estimated Habitat (contact:Environmental Review, Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, Route 135,

Westborough, MA 01581, allowing 30 days for receipt of information):

2. Have you surveyed the site for rare species? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please include theresults of your survey.3. If your project is within Estimated Habitat, have you filed a Notice of Intent or received an

Order of Conditions for this project? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, did you send a copy of theNotice of Intent to the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program, in accordance

with the Wetlands Protection Act regulations? ___ Yes ___ No

B. Will the project "take" an endangered, threatened, and/or species of special concern in

accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.04)? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, describe:

C. Will the project alter "significant habitat" as designated by the Massachusetts Division ofFisheries and Wildlife in accordance with M.G.L. c.131A (see also 321 CMR 10.30)? ___ Yes ___

No; if yes, describe:

D. Describe the project's other impacts on rare species including indirect impacts (for example,

stormwater runoff into a wetland known to contain rare species or lighting impacts on rare mothhabitat):

WETLANDS, WATERWAYS, AND TIDELANDS SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wetlands, waterways, andtidelands (see 301 CMR 11.03(3))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits (or a local Order of Conditions) related to wetlands,waterways, or tidelands? _X__ Yes _ No; if yes, specify which permit: Order of ConditionNumber: DEP# 246-636

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Water Supply Section. If youanswered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Wetlands,

Waterways, and Tidelands Section below.


13/42

10


II. Wetlands Impacts and PermitsA. Describe any wetland resource areas currently existing on the project site and indicate them onthe site plan:

B. Estimate the extent and type of impact that the project will have on wetland resources, andindicate whether the impacts are temporary or permanent:

Coastal Wetlands Area (in square feet) or Length (in linear feet)

Land Under the Ocean _____________________________________ Designated Port Areas _____________________________________

Coastal Beaches _____________________________________ Coastal Dunes _____________________________________

Barrier Beaches _____________________________________ Coastal Banks _____________________________________

Rocky Intertidal Shores _____________________________________

Salt Marshes _____________________________________ Land Under Salt Ponds _____________________________________

Land Containing Shellfish _____________________________________ Fish Runs _____________________________________

Land Subject to Coastal Storm Flowage _____________________________________

Inland WetlandsBank _____________________________________

Bordering Vegetated Wetlands This project involves adding an earthen berm within the100 buffer zone to a Bordering Vegetated Wetlands.

Land under Water _____________________________________

Isolated Land Subject to Flooding _____________________________________Bordering Land Subject to Flooding _____________________________________

Riverfront Area _____________________________________

C. Is any part of the project1. a limited project? ___ Yes _X__ No

2. the construction or alteration of a dam? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe:3. fill or structure in a velocity zone or regulatory floodway? ___ Yes _X_ No

4. dredging or disposal of dredged material? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe the volumeof dredged material and the proposed disposal site:

5. a discharge to Outstanding Resource Waters? ___ Yes _X_ No

6. subject to a wetlands restriction order? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, identify the area (insquare feet):

D. Does the project require a new or amended Order of Conditions under the Wetlands Protection

Act (M.G.L. c.131A)? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, has a Notice of Intent been filed or a local Order ofConditions issued? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, list the date and DEP file number:__Order of Condition

Number DEP# 246-636, recorded 1/27/2010. Was the Order of Conditions appealed? ___ Yes

_X_ No. Will the project require a variance from the Wetlands regulations? ___ Yes _X_ No.

E. Will the project:

1. be subject to a local wetlands ordinance or bylaw? _X_ Yes ___ No

2. alter any federally-protected wetlands not regulated under state or local law?___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, what is the area (in s.f.)?

F. Describe the project's other impacts on wetlands (including new shading of wetland areas or


14/42

11


removal of tree canopy from forested wetlands):

III. Waterways and Tidelands Impacts and PermitsA. Is any part of the project site waterways or tidelands (including filled former tidelands) that are

subject to the Waterways Act, M.G.L.c.91? ___ Yes __X_ No; if yes, is there a current Chapter 91

license or permit affecting the project site? ___ Yes __X_ No; if yes, list the date and number:

B. Does the project require a new or modified license under M.G.L.c.91? ___ Yes _X_No; if yes, how many acres of the project site subject to M.G.L.c.91 will be for non-water

dependent use?Current ___ Change ___ Total ___

C. Is any part of the project

1. a roadway, bridge, or utility line to or on a barrier beach? ___ Yes ___X___ No; if yes,describe:

2. dredging or disposal of dredged material? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, volume of dredged

material ______3. a solid fill, pile-supported, or bottom-anchored structure in flowed tidelands or other

waterways? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, what is the base area? _______4. within a Designated Port Area? ___ Yes _X_ No

D. Describe the project's other impacts on waterways and tidelands:

IV. Consistency:A. Is the project located within the Coastal Zone? ___ Yes _X__ No; if yes, describe the project'sconsistency with policies of the Office of Coastal Zone Management:

B. Is the project located within an area subject to a Municipal Harbor Plan? ___ Yes __X_ No; if

yes, identify the Municipal Harbor Plan and describe the project's consistency with that plan:

WATER SUPPLY SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to water supply (see 301 CMR11.03(4))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to water supply? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes,specify which permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Wastewater Section. If youanswered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Water Supply Sectionbelow.

II. Impacts and PermitsA. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and source of water use for existing and proposed activities

at the project site:Existing Change Total

Withdrawal from groundwater ________ ________ ________

Withdrawal from surface water ________ ________ ________ Interbasin transfer ________ ________ ________

Municipal or regional water supply ________ ________ ________


15/42

12


B. If the source is a municipal or regional supply, has the municipality or region indicated that there

is adequate capacity in the system to accommodate the project? ___ Yes ___ No

C. If the project involves a new or expanded withdrawal from a groundwater or surface water source,

1. have you submitted a permit application? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach the

application

2. have you conducted a pump test? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, attach the pump test report

D. What is the currently permitted withdrawal at the proposed water supply source (in gallons/day)?

Will the project require an increase in that withdrawal?___ Yes ___ No

E. Does the project site currently contain a water supply well, a drinking water treatment facility,

water main, or other water supply facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? ___Yes ___ No. If yes, describe existing and proposed water supply facilities at the project site:


Water supply well(s) (capacity, in gpd) ________ ________ ________ Drinking water treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) ________ ________ ________

Water mains (length, in miles) ________ ________ ________

F. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of water, which basins are involved, what is the

direction of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?

G. Does the project involve1. new water service by a state agency to a municipality or water district? ___ Yes ___ No

2. a Watershed Protection Act variance? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, how many acres ofalteration?

3. a non-bridged stream crossing 1,000 or less feet upstream of a public surface drinkingwater supply for purpose of forest harvesting activities? ___ Yes ___ No

H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on water resources, quality,

facilities and services:

III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with water conservation plans or other plans toenhance water resources, quality, facilities and services:

WASTEWATER SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to wastewater(see 301 CMR11.03(5))? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms: The project will exceed thethreshold related to the expansion in discharge to a sewer system of 100,000 or more gpd ofsewage and industrial wastewater. The maximum daily flow will increase by 200,000 gpd.

B. Does the project require any state permits related to wastewater? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes,specify which permit:

Coca-Cola Facility ExpansionMA DEP Sewer Connection/Extension PermitMA DEP BWP IW 38


16/42

13


Bradford Street Pump StationMA DEP BRP WP 68 Treatment Works Plan Approval

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Transportation -- TrafficGeneration Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out theremainder of the Wastewater Section below.

II. Impacts and PermitsA. Describe, in gallons/day, the volume and disposal of wastewater generation for existing andproposed activities at the project site (calculate according to 310 CMR 15.00):

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION Existing Change TotalDischarge to groundwater (Title 5) __0_____ __0_____ _0______ Discharge to groundwater (non-Title 5) __0_____ __0_____ _0______

Discharge to outstanding resource water __0_____ __0_____ _0______ Discharge to surface water __0_____ __0_____ _0______

Municipal or regional wastewater facility _400,000_ _200,000_ _600,000_

TOTAL _400,000_ _200,000_ _600,000_

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION Existing Change TotalDischarge to groundwater (Title 5) ____0___ ___0____ __0_____

Discharge to groundwater (non-Title 5) ____0___ ___0____ __0_____ Discharge to outstanding resource water ____0___ ___0____ __0_____

Discharge to surface water ____0___ ___0___ __0_____ *Municipal or regional wastewater facility 600,000* 200,000* 800,000*

TOTAL 600,000* 200,000* 800,000** Estimated maximum daily flow at Bradford Street Pump Station, which conveys flowsfrom Coca Cola and other sources. Wastewater is being transmitted only. No wastewatergeneration or treatment exists or is being proposed at the Bradford Street Pump Stationsite.

B. Is there sufficient capacity in the existing collection system to accommodate the project?_X_ Yes ___ No; if no, describe where capacity will be found: A hydraulic evaluationshowed that there is sufficient capacity downstream of the Bradford Street PumpStation to convey the increase in flows resulting from the Coca Cola expansion.Regarding the capacity of the collection system between the Coca Cola facility and thePump Station, Coca Cola is planning to implement engineering controls at thepretreatment facility to limit the instantaneous peak discharge to levels that are withinthe hydraulic capacity of the collection system.

C. Is there sufficient existing capacity at the proposed wastewater disposal facility?_X_ Yes ___

No; if no, describe how capacity will be increased:

D. Does the project site currently contain a wastewater treatment facility, sewer main, or otherwastewater disposal facility, or will the project involve construction of a new facility? _X_ Yes ___

No. If yes, describe as follows: Coca-Cola expansion project will include construction ofwastewater pretreatment facility (anaerobic system) adding to the existing pH adjustmentsystem. Bradford Street pump station project does not currently contain nor will it involve


17/42

14


construction of a treatment or disposal facility. Neither the Coca-Cola expansion nor thePump Station replacement involves expanding the length of the existing collection system.

COCA-COLA FACILITY EXPANSION Existing Change TotalWastewater treatment plant (capacity, in gpd) _400,000_ _200,000 _600,000Sewer mains (length, in miles) _0______ __0_____ _0______

Title 5 systems (capacity, in gpd) _0______ __0_____ _0______

E. If the project involves any interbasin transfer of wastewater, which basins are involved, what is thedirection of the transfer, and is the interbasin transfer existing or proposed?

F. Does the project involve new sewer service by an Agency of the Commonwealth to a municipalityor sewer district? ___ Yes _X__ No

G. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing,

combustion or disposal of sewage sludge, sludge ash, grit, screenings, or other sewage residualmaterials? _X_ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the capacity (in tons per day):

Existing Change TotalStorage (Anaerobic biosolids) __0_____ _15,000_ _15,000_

Treatment, processing __0_____ ________ ________ Combustion __0_____ ________ ________

Disposal __0_____ ________ ________

H. Describe the project's other impacts (including indirect impacts) on wastewater generation andtreatment facilities:

Coca-Cola Facility ExpansionProposed wastewater pretreatment system will treat load created by proposed additionsand reduce load from existing operations. This allows for a reduced overall load butincreased flow to the DPW treatment system.

Bradford Street Pump Station

There are no other known impacts on wastewater generation and treatment facilitiesstemming from the Pump Station project.

III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state,regional, and local plans and policies related to wastewater management:

Coca-Cola Facility ExpansionLocal wastewater discharge permit is in process of being approved, state BWP IW38 permitwill be submitted. Approvals confirm consistency with applicable regulations. The proponentwill comply with all other federal, state, regional and local plans and policies pertaining towastewater management.

Bradford Street Pump StationThe proponent will comply with all federal, state, regional and local plans and policiespertaining to wastewater management. Preliminary discussions with the City, DEP and otherregulating agencies will continue as the project and related permitting evolves.

A. If the project requires a sewer extension permit, is that extension included in a comprehensive

wastewater management plan? ___ Yes X___ No; if yes, indicate the EOEA number for the planand describe the relationship of the project to the plan


18/42

15


TRANSPORTATION -- TRAFFIC GENERATION SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to traffic generation (see 301

CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to state-controlled roadways? ___ Yes_X_ No; if yes, specify which permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Roadways and OtherTransportation Facilities Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill outthe remainder of the Traffic Generation Section below.

II. Traffic Impacts and PermitsA. Describe existing and proposed vehicular traffic generated by activities at the project site:


Number of parking spaces _______ ________ _______ Number of vehicle trips per day ________ ________ ________

ITE Land Use Code(s):

B. What is the estimated average daily traffic on roadways serving the site?

Roadway Existing Change Total1. ____________________ ________ ________ ________

2. ____________________ ________ ________ ________

3. ____________________ ________ ________ ________

C. Describe how the project will affect transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities

and services:

III. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with municipal, regional,state, and federal plans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities

and services:

ROADWAYS AND OTHER TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES SECTION

I. ThresholdsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to roadways or other

transportation facilities (see 301 CMR 11.03(6))? ___ Yes X__ No; if yes, specify, in quantitativeterms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to roadways or other transportationfacilities? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify which permit:C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Energy Section. If youanswered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Roadways Section

below.

II. Transportation Facility ImpactsA. Describe existing and proposed transportation facilities at the project site:



19/42

16


Length (in linear feet) of new or widened roadway ________ ________ ________

Width (in feet) of new or widened roadway ________ ________ ________

Other transportation facilities:

B. Will the project involve any

1. Alteration of bank or terrain (in linear feet)? ____________2. Cutting of living public shade trees (number)? ____________3. Elimination of stone wall (in linear feet)? ____________

III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with other federal, state, regional, and localplans and policies related to traffic, transit, pedestrian and bicycle transportation facilities and services,including consistency with the applicable regional transportation plan and the Transportation Improvements

Plan (TIP), the State Bicycle Plan, and the State Pedestrian Plan:

ENERGY SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to energy (see 301 CMR11.03(7))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to energy? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specifywhich permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Air Quality Section. If youanswered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the Energy Section

below.

II. Impacts and Permits

A. Describe existing and proposed energy generation and transmission facilities at the project site:Existing Change Total

Capacity of electric generating facility (megawatts) ________ ________ ________Length of fuel line (in miles) ________ ________ ________

Length of transmission lines (in miles) ________ ________ ________ Capacity of transmission lines (in kilovolts) ________ ________ ________

B. If the project involves construction or expansion of an electric generating facility, what are1. the facility's current and proposed fuel source(s)?

2. the facility's current and proposed cooling source(s)?

C. If the project involves construction of an electrical transmission line, will it be located on a new,unused, or abandoned right of way?___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe:

D. Describe the project's other impacts on energy facilities and services:

III. Consistency -- Describe the project's consistency with state, municipal, regional, and federal plansand policies for enhancing energy facilities and services:


20/42

17


AIR QUALITY SECTION

I. ThresholdsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to air quality (see 301 CMR11.03(8))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to air quality? ___ Yes _X_ No; ifyes, specify which permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Solid and Hazardous WasteSection. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainder of the AirQuality Section below.

II. Impacts and PermitsA. Does the project involve construction or modification of a major stationary source (see 310 CMR

7.00, Appendix A)?___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, describe existing and proposed emissions (in tons perday) of:

Existing Change TotalParticulate matter ________ ________ ________

Carbon monoxide ________ ________ ________ Sulfur dioxide ________ ________ ________

Volatile organic compounds ________ ________ ________ Oxides of nitrogen ________ ________ ________

Lead ________ ________ ________ Any hazardous air pollutant ________ ________ ________

Carbon dioxide ________ ________ ________

B. Describe the project's other impacts on air resources and air quality, including noise impacts:

III. ConsistencyA. Describe the project's consistency with the State Implementation Plan:

B. Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with other federal, state, regional, andlocal plans and policies related to air resources and air quality:

SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE SECTION

I. Thresholds / PermitsA. Will the project meet or exceed any review thresholds related to solid or hazardous waste (see301 CMR 11.03(9))? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, specify, in quantitative terms:

B. Does the project require any state permits related to solid and hazardous waste? ___ Yes X_No; if yes, specify which permit:

C. If you answered "No" to both questions A and B, proceed to the Historical and Archaeological

Resources Section. If you answered "Yes" to either question A or question B, fill out the remainderof the Solid and Hazardous Waste Section below.

II. Impacts and PermitsA. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, treatment, processing,combustion or disposal of solid waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons per day)

of the capacity:


21/42

18



Storage ________ ________ ________

Treatment, processing ________ ________ ________ Combustion ________ ________ ________

Disposal ________ ________ ________

B. Is there any current or proposed facility at the project site for the storage, recycling, treatment or

disposal of hazardous waste? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, what is the volume (in tons or gallons perday) of the capacity:

Existing Change TotalStorage ________ ________ ________

Recycling ________ ________ ________

Treatment ________ ________ ________ Disposal ________ ________ ________

C. If the project will generate solid waste (for example, during demolition or construction), describe

alternatives considered for re-use, recycling, and disposal:

D. If the project involves demolition, do any buildings to be demolished contain asbestos?

___ Yes ___ No

E. Describe the project's other solid and hazardous waste impacts (including indirect impacts):

III. Consistency--Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with the State Solid WasteMaster Plan:

HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES SECTION

I. Thresholds / Impacts

A. Is any part of the project site a historic structure, or a structure within a historic district, in eithercase listed in the State Register of Historic Places or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological

Assets of the Commonwealth? ___ Yes _X_ No; if yes, does the project involve the demolition ofall or any exterior part of such historic structure? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, please describe:

B. Is any part of the project site an archaeological site listed in the State Register of Historic Places

or the Inventory of Historic and Archaeological Assets of the Commonwealth? ___ Yes _X_

Findings from MHC pending for Bradford Street Pump Station; if yes, does the project involvethe destruction of all or any part of such archaeological site? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes, pleasedescribe:

C. If you answered "No" to all parts of both questions A and B, proceed to the Attachments andCertifications Sections. If you answered "Yes" to any part of either question A or question B, fill out

the remainder of the Historical and Archaeological Resources Section below.

D. Have you consulted with the Massachusetts Historical Commission? ___ Yes ___ No; if yes,attach correspondence

E. Describe and assess the project's other impacts, direct and indirect, on listed or inventoried

historical and archaeological resources:


22/42

19


II. Consistency -- Describe measures that the proponent will take to comply with federal, state,regional, and local plans and policies related to preserving historical and archaeological resources:

ATTACHMENTS:1. Plan, at an appropriate scale, of existing conditions of the project site and its immediate

context, showing all known structures, roadways and parking lots, rail rights-of-way, wetlandsand water bodies, wooded areas, farmland, steep slopes, public open spaces, and major

utilities.

2. Plan of proposed conditions upon completion of project (if construction of the project isproposed to be phased, there should be a site plan showing conditions upon the completion

of each phase).

3. Original U.S.G.S. map or good quality colorcopy (8- x 11 inches or larger) indicating theproject location and boundaries

4 List of all agencies and persons to whom the proponent circulated the ENF, in accordancewith 301 CMR 11.16(2).

5. Other:


23/42


24/42

ATTACHMENT1 EXHIBITS


25/42

(

(

(

(

(

(

( (

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

((

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

(

8''

12''

AC

8''AC

8'' VC

10'' AC

8''

PVC

8''

RCP

8''PV

C

8''

8'' VC

12''AC

8''

8''

8''

8''

8'' VC

8'' AC

8''

AC

8''

8''

8'' VC

.

Legend

( Sewer Manhole

Sewer Line

DEEP MARSH

SHALLOW MARSH

SHRUB SWAMP

DECIDUOUS SWAMP

kj CertifiedVernalPoolsPriorityHabitat

0 350 700175Fe

1:4,000

EXHIBIT 1

EXISTING CONDITIONS

EXISTINGPUMPSTATION

COCA-COLA FACILITY

Q3 FLOOD ZONES

A

AE

AH

AO

X500

UNDES

___________________


26/42

S E A CON SULTAN TS INC.

PROPOSED CONDITIONS

PROJECT ALTERNATIVE

BRADFORD STREET PUMP STATION

EXHIBIT 2

0

SCALE: 1"=20'

SCALE IN FEET

20 40 60

APPROX. DRY PIT LOCATION

AND ABOVE GRADE STRUCTURE

APPROX. WET

WELL LOCATIONEXTERIOR ELECTRICAL

FACILITIES AND BACKUP

GENERATOR PAD

YARD AND PARKING AREA

APPROX. PROJECT

BOUNDARY


27/42

.

0 2,0001,000Feet

1:15,000

EXHIBIT 3

USGS MAP

COKE FACILITY

SEWER

PUMP

STATION

WWTP


28/42


29/42


30/42

ATTACHMENT2 E N F C IRCULATIONLIST


31/42

ENF CIRCULATION LIST:

2 full sized copies + copy of 4 first pages to:

Secretary Ian A. BowlesExecutive Office of Environmental AffairsAttn: MEPA Office100 Cambridge Street, Suite 900Boston, MA 02114

1 copy to:

Department of Environmental ProtectionBoston OfficeCommissioner's OfficeOne Winter StreetBoston, MA 02108

DEP/Western Regional OfficeAttn: MEPA Coordinator436 Dwight StreetSpringfield, MA 01103

MHDPublic/Private Development Unit10 Park Plaza

Boston, MA 02116

MHD - District #2Attn: MEPA Coordinator811 North King Street


Mass Historical CommissionThe MA Archives Building220 Morrissey BoulevardBoston, MA 02125

Pioneer Valley Planning Commission60 Congress StreetSpringfield, MA 01104

City CouncilCity Hall Room 18210 Main Street


Northampton Planning Board andConservation210 Main St., Rm. 11, City Hall


Northampton Health Department

212 Main StreetNorthampton, MA 01060

DCRAttn: MEPA Coordinator251 Causeway Street, Suite 600

Boston, MA 02114


32/42

ATTACHMENT3 PUBLICNOTICE OFENVIRONMENTALREVIEW


33/42


34/42

ATTACHMENT4 M A H ISTORICCOMMISSIONPROJECTNOTIFICATIONFORM


35/42

950 CMR: OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH

APPENDIX A

MASSACHUSETTS HISTORICAL COMMISSION

220 MORRISSEY BOULEVARD

BOSTON, MASS. 02125617-727-8470, FAX: 617-727-5128

PROJECT NOTIFICATION FORM

Project Name: ________________________________________________________________________________

Location / Address: ___________________________________________________________________________

City / Town: ________________________________________________________________________________

Project Proponent

Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

Address: ____________________________________________________________________________________

City/Town/Zip/Telephone: _____________________________________________________________________

Agency license or funding for the project (list all licenses, permits, approvals, grants or other entitlements beingsought from state and federal agencies).

Agency Name Type of License or funding (specify)

Project Description (narrative):

Does the project include demolition? If so, specify nature of demolition and describe the building(s) whichare proposed for demolition.

Does the project include rehabilitation of any existing buildings? If so, specify nature of rehabilitationand describe the building(s) which are proposed for rehabilitation.

Does the project include new construction? If so, describe (attach plans and elevations if necessary).

5/31/96 (Effective 7/1/93) - corrected 950 CMR - 275

MA DEPARTMENT OF ENV. PROTECTION BRP WP 68 TREATMENT WORKS PLAN

MA HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT $1.125 MILLION INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT GRANT

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY NPDES DEWATERING GENERAL PERMIT


36/42


37/42

ATTACHMENT5 TRAFFICIMPACT ANDACCESSSTUDY

(COCA-COLA FACILITYEXPANSION)


38/42


39/42


40/42


41/42


42/42

Date post:	07-Apr-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	mcsnews-archive
View:	221 times
Download:	0 times

Coca-Cola ENF Northampton MA DPW

Documents