+ All Categories
Home > Education > Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Date post: 18-Aug-2015
Category:
Upload: atalbot21
View: 172 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
36
Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low Income Students: THEORIES OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY NOVEMBER 20, 2014 & The FAB Scale
Transcript
Page 1: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low Income Students:

THEORIES OF COLLEGE STUDENT DEVELOPMENT

SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY

NOVEMBER 20, 2014

& The FAB

Scale

Page 2: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Take a Walk…in their shoes. T

Page 3: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Statistics and Reasoning Among students who performed in the top third on

standardized tests, low income students are five times more likely to skip college than high income students.

While 50% of people from high income families earn a Bachelor's degree by age 25, only 9% from low income families do.

First-generation college students are more than twice as likely to leave college without earning a degree than students whose parents have college degrees (43% to 20%)

Akerheilm, K., et al. "Factors related to college enrollment: Final report." 1998. In Thayer, P.B. (2000). Retaining first generation and low income students. Opportunity Outlook, 2-8.

Choy, S. "Students whose parents did not go to college: Post-secondary access, persistence, and attainment." 2001. In Pell Institute. (2006). Straight from the Source: What works for first-generation college students. Washington, DC.

Martha J. Bailey and Susan M. Dynarski, “Inequality in Postsecondary Attainment,” 2011. In Executive Office of the President. (2014). Increasing college opportunity for low-income students: Promising models and a call to action. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office

D

Page 4: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Codujota’s Theory of First Generation Low Income Students Based on the premise that areas of concerns are unique and

affect the holistic development of the student. Three specific areas of concern are:

Financial Concerns (Bill, Credit, Loans, Employment, etc.) Academic Concerns (Credit Hours, Workload, Support, etc.) Belonging Concerns (Family, Friend, Partner Support, etc.)

Students achieve their own unique ‘equation’ of these three areas for concern based on a numerical assessment of their personal situation.

T

Page 5: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

F+A+B=TC

T

Page 6: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

The Theory

Financial Academic Belonging

Total Competence

0

10

10

10

0 0

0 30

T

Page 7: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Financial

Paying for CollegeHow am I going to afford this whole thing?

Paying for LifeHow can I make this work from day to day?

D

Page 8: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Financial Paying for College

StressorsThe college application process is full of hidden

fees"Tuition" is a fraction of the total costAid often declines after the first yearAnnual reapplication is a scheduled reminder

SupportsFederal grants, low-interest loans availableAid counseling available

D

Page 9: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Financial Paying for Life

StressorsEssentials: Meals, Books, Laptop, Transportation,

Clothes, Project MaterialsImportants: Cell Phone, Social OutingsNecessary Evils: Job/Work Study

SupportsSubsidies for EssentialsNurturing Social NetworkRaise/Extra Shift/Second Job

D

Page 10: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Financial Scale

High Competence

Mid Competence

Low Competence

Student is rarely concerned with finances. Not a real source of stress, even

occasionally.

Student feels reasonably settled financially. Occasionally must deal with difficulties, but

needn't be preoccupied with them.

Student's financial well-being is a significant source of stress. Frequent struggles with

short- and long-term finances.

5

10

0

D

Page 11: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Academic Institution

How does the college or university itself help or hinder academic success?

Family How does family consciously or subconsciously affect

academic success?

Work How do work commitments affect the amount of time or

energy needed for academic work?

E

Page 12: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Academic

InstitutionSupport Programs, career counselors, and tutors readily available

and sensitive to student situation

Stressor Institution lacks programs or experience with first gen

students Lacks academic support programs

E

Page 13: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

AcademicFamilySupport Family members support and do their best to understand

students pursuits Understand student may be less available for family activities

Stressor Lack of understanding or support of students academic

pursuits Pressure and guilt regarding family matters placed on student

E

Page 14: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Academic

WorkSupport Flexibility of schedule Empathetic employer/co-workers Stability of position

Stressor Threatened to lose job Non-empathetic employer/co-workers Physically or mentally exhausting job

E

Page 15: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Academic Scale

High Competence

Mid Competence

Low Competence

Student has the ability to focus on academics, and puts in the time, energy, and effort needed to achieve the best grades possible. Is satisfied with the work accomplished.

Student struggles with academics and having the time and energy to put into them. Grades may fluctuate, as will students self approval of work done.

Student lacks the time, energy, and ability to focus on academics and receives low grades. Feels unsatisfied with the work done.

5

10

0

E

Page 16: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Belonging Family

Is the family supportive?What role do they play in the college experience?

FriendsWho are they?What do they do?

Campus Involvement What is the student involved in?How active is their commitment?Where does such a commitment come from?

A

Page 17: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Belonging FAMILY

Support:Family is proud of student and encourages them to do wellThey maintain constant contact and wish to be informed of

student's experienceThey assist with finances or encourage/assist student in

maintaining his or her ownStressor:

Family is frustrated at students enrollment and are unsupportive of the decision

They have little to no presence in students lifeAll financial needs are to be undertaken by the student

A

Page 18: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Belonging FRIENDS

Support:Friends remain close to the student and relive other

stressorsThey accept student for who they are, regardless of

other factors (educational attainment, financial background, etc.)

Stressor:Friends are vast and varied and it is difficult for the

student to ascertain their level of emotional commitmentFriends seem to critique the student, point out his or her

flaws, and seem to insist that student change certain aspects of themselves.

A

Page 19: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Belonging INVOLVEMENT

Support:Students choice to join clubs/organizations was the result

of his or her own decision and passionThere is a sense of fulfillment from participation on campus

Stressor: Student feels little to no attachment to

clubs/organizations. They joined for alternative reasons other than desire or passion

Activities of campus involvement are viewed as mundane and non-beneficial. (This may be reflection of other members or students)

A

Page 20: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

"A feeling of belonging is crucial, especially for first generation students or those who might have trouble

adapting to the college environment. The purpose of [the office of] Student Involvement [and Activities] is to find ways to reach out to those students and engage them. Becoming involved on campus through a club helps to

build connections.....[students will] make friends and have something to look forward to."

-Rebecca Jimenez, Director of Student Involvement and Activities, Salem State University

A

Page 21: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Belonging Scale

High Competence

Mid Competence

Low Competence

Student has high support from both family and friends. They feel a strong connection to

the campus

Student receives some support from family and friends, though can I time feel distanced

from them and the college environment.

Student has little or no outside support. There is constant pressure from family. Friends are

limited or unaccepting. Campus feels foreign.

5

10

0

A

Page 22: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

FAB Total Competence Scale

30

200 10

High CompetenceMid CompetenceLow Competence

Student is doing exceptionally well in all areas of concern and should be offered

support as needed. An area may still be of concern and resources should be directed to

enhance.

a. managing all areas of concern with successes and failures along the way.

b. mastering one (or two) areas while struggling in the second and/or third.

Student is struggling with multiple areas of concern and may require numerous resources

to achieve educational goals originally created. Student is at risk of departing.

T

Page 23: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Student Profiles

Page 24: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Cindy Rella

Financial Academic Belonging0

2

4

6

8

10

Page 25: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Tim Puzzle

Financial Academic Belonging0

2

4

6

8

10

Page 26: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Poco Jontas

Financial Academic Belonging0

2

4

6

8

10

Page 27: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Vol DeMort

Financial Academic Belonging0

2

4

6

8

10

Page 28: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Erikson’s Identity Development Theory

Development spans a person’s entire lifeDevelopment is based on the influence of the

external environment as well as internal dynamicsStages

Each stage is distinguished by a psychological crisis or turning point that must be resolved by balancing the internal self and the external environment.

Each crisis must produce a developmental change in order for the person to grapple with later developmental crises.

A

Page 29: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

ERIKSON CODUJOTA

Stage Five: Identity vs. Identity Diffusion (Confusion)

Defining the Self:Establishment of core sense of self, values, beliefs, and goals.

Diffusion:Struggles with developing their core sense of self may experience confusion and insecurities about themselves and their relationships with others

Lack of clear sense of self or purpose

Defining Competence:Am I capable?Is this worth it?What is my drive?

Low Competence:Results from negative answers from the above questions

Lack of supportLack of confidenceLimited resourcesInability to manage stressors

Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2010). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

A

Page 30: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

ERIKSON CODUJOTA

Stage Six: Intimacy vs. Isolation

Establishing IntimacyConnecting personal identity to another'sCreation of intimacy and committed relationships

Distantiation“..the readiness to repudiate, to isolate, and if necessary, to destroy those forces and people whose essence seems dangerous to one’s own”

IsolationLack of strong sense of identity leads to difficulty building relationships and results in emotional stress and isolation

Establishing CompetenceBeing able to manage stressorsBecoming independent in achieving competence through available supportsElimination of specific stressors

Lack of CompetenceStressors are too overwhelmingLack of confidence or drive to utilize available supportsFocus on specific competence, rather than rounding them all

Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2010). Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

A

Page 31: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Chickering’s Theory of

Identity Development Development occurs uniquely for each student. Constant revaluation of each area to ensure

competence in each area. Vectors work together and build on each other. Recalls emotional, interpersonal, ethical and

intellectual aspects of development. Three Tined Pitchfork & Handle Model relates to

Codujota’s FAB Scale leading to Total Competence.

T

Page 32: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Chickering’s Theory of Identity Development

Codujota’s Theory of First Generation Low Income

StudentsVector 1: Developing Competence

Student develops intellectual & interpersonal competence as well as

physical & manual skills . This development is fueled by confidence.

What do I need to know? Who do I need to know and what must I do to be

successful? What is the source of my confidence?

Vector 3: Moving Through Autonomy Toward Interdependence

Student develops emotional independence, free from the need of

constant praise and reassurance. Students become self-dependent,

able to solve their own problems and mobile. Students also realize

their place in relation to others and the importance of their

relationships.

Student distances self from the need of constant support, but seeks healthy relationships that will support their

academic success. Total Competence depends heavily on support and resources

that benefit student, while still maintaining ownership of their

experience.

Vector 4: Developing Mature Interpersonal Relationships

Student develops interpersonal and intercultural knowledge and

acceptance of their place in society. Student develops the ability to

pursue long term relationships with others and respects individuals

for who they are, with similarities and differences.

Students are able to accept their own lived reality and background as it defines them in an effort to increase belonging

and possibly academic identity on campus. Friends and support groups are important and can further success and

lead to degree completion.

T

Page 33: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Chickering’s Theory of Identity Development

Codujota’s Theory of First Generation Low Income

StudentsVector 5: Establishing identity

Student acknowledges differences in identity based on gender,

ethnicity and sexual orientation amongst others. Student has

developed a comfort with who they are and what makes them unique

and special.

Students are able to establish high total competence in their development as a college student. They realize how their individual experiences can impact their

successes or struggles as a student.

Vector 6: Developing Purpose

Student defines themselves as a professional and a positive

contributor to society. The student realizes that they are valuable to

others and that their actions with colleagues can make or break

them. They have a life purpose and a calling.

Student receives high levels of support and finds their own balance of the FAB

Scale, leading to high total competence. Student comes into their own and develops holistically as a college

student and values their drive and motivation.

T

Page 34: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Bridging the Gaps MMSI/MIE Student Services White House Initiative (January 2014)

TransparencyUp-front investment, payment optionsBuilding groups supports (Posse Foundation)

D

Page 35: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

Limitations Difficult to ascertain whether the three factors are equal

in their influence

Not all first generation/low socioeconomic students are the same (as seen in video clip).

Other variables (student age, gender, and ethnicity) are not taken into account and may change the equation.

Total Competence is not homogeneous and may appear different in different cases.

E

Page 36: Codujota's Theory of First Generation Low-Socioeconomic Students

References:Evans, N. J., Forney, D. S., Guido, F. M., Patton, L. D., & Renn, K. A. (2010).

Student development in college: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Executive Office of the President (2014). Increasing college opportunity for low-income students: Promising models and a call to action. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Pell Institute (2006). Straight from the source: What works for first-generation college students. Washington, DC.

Thayer, P.B. (2000). Retaining first generation and low income students. Opportunity Outlook, 2-8.


Recommended