+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Cogeneration:Energy Production Maximizing Efficiency and Minimizing Environmental ... ·...

Cogeneration:Energy Production Maximizing Efficiency and Minimizing Environmental ... ·...

Date post: 20-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: hoangnhu
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
27
Restricted © Siemens AG 2017 siemens.com/gasturbines Cogeneration:Energy Production Maximizing Efficiency and Minimizing Environmental Impact at all scales Gastech, Tokyo, April 2017
Transcript

Restricted © Siemens AG 2017 siemens.com/gasturbines

Cogeneration:Energy Production

Maximizing Efficiency and Minimizing

Environmental Impact at all scalesGastech, Tokyo, April 2017

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 2 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Introduction

Increasing financial and

environmental challenges

Using energy more efficiently

helps address the ‘Energy

Trilemma’

Cogeneration is an opportunity to

improve efficiency and reduce

environmental impact

open to energy consumers of

all sizes

Security of

SupplyPrice of

Electricity

Environment

The Energy

Trilemma

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 3 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Introduction

The Centralised Power Generation Model – is it really < 60% efficient ?

What if we generated the power for local communities at

distribution level ?100

105

6050 - 55

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 4 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Benefits of Distributed Power

• High Energy Efficiency

• Especially Cogeneration

• Competitive Installed Costs

• Multi-fuel capability

• Security of supply

• Can help provide grid stability

Introduction

0 20 40 60 80 100

Open Cycle

Separate Heat & Power

Combined Cycle

Cogeneration

Overall Energy Efficiencies (%)

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 5 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Introduction

CO2 emissions depend on:

Efficiency

Fuel Type

Natural Gas is the fuel of choice

Widespread availability

No shortage of reserves

Transportable

Competitively priced

Clean

• Low CO2, NOx etc.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

Natural

Gas

Diesel Coal Lignite Wood MSW (non-

Biomass)

CO2 Emission Factors (T per MWh)

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 6 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

What is Cogeneration ?

The simultaneous production of heat (or

cooling) and power from a single source

• Topping Cycle

• Electricity Focus, waste energy to heat

• Bottoming Cycle

• Heat focus, surplus heat to electricity

• Can provide heat in various forms

• Steam

• Hot Water

• Hot AirORC photo ©Turboden, Italy

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 7 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

What is Cogeneration ?

A properly designed CHP plant is the most efficient way to meet a site’s

local energy demands and reduce fuel costs

Fuel

100%

25 -

60%

75 -

90%

Electricity

Remote

Power

Plant

On-

site

Boiler

Steam

Losses 10 -20%

T&D losses c. 5%

Steam distribution

losses

Fuel

100%

Overall Energy Efficiency = 50 – 75%

Losses 40 - 70%

On-site

Cogeneration

Plant

Fuel

100%

> 30%Electricity

Steam

Losses < 25%

Steam

distribution

losses

> 45%

Overall Energy Efficiency: > 75%

Restricted © Siemens AG 2017

05.04.2017Page 8 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Distributed Power

Cogeneration: The lowest CO2 option to meet energy demands

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

Separate Heat &Power: Low

Scenario

Separate Heat &Power: High

Scenario

80%Cogeneration

CO2 Emissions (kg/h)10MW electricity

20MW heat

Natural Gas Fuel

Low Scenario:

Power Generation Efficiency: 30%

Heat Generation Efficiency: 85%

High Scenario:

Power Generation Efficiency: 55%

Heat Generation Efficiency: 90%

up to 1/3

Reduction in CO2

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 9 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Where can CHP be used ?

Anywhere that has both a heat and

power demand

Domestic buildings

Commercial Buildings

Municipalities

• District Heating / Cooling

• Hospitals, Swimming Pools, Universities…

Industry

• Chemicals, Automotive, Pharmaceuticals,

Food & Beverage, Pulp & Paper, Textiles,

Ceramics, RefineriesIndustrial Trent CHP plant at a cardboard

manufacturing facility providing 50MW power

and 200 psig process steam

Unrestricted © Siemens 2016Page 10

Cogeneration:

Key Selection Criteria

Meeting thermal and power load requirements

Reducing energy costs

Availability and reliability

Lower emissions

Fuel flexibility

Enhanced control

Financing solutions

Life-cycle support

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 11 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

What Technologies are out there ?

A wide range of potential technologies to satisfy all Cogeneration

applications at all scales

Microturbine

Increasing Power

High and Medium Speed Reciprocating

Engines (Gas Engines)

Industrial Gas

Turbine

Steam Turbine

Domestic Commercial Municipal Industrial

Stirling Engine

Reciprocating

Engine

Organic Rankine CycleAero-derivative

Gas Turbine

Heavy Duty

Gas Turbine

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 12 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Selecting the right technology

Economics driven

Look at:

Heat or Power focus

Scale of project

Type of heat required

• Steam

• Hot Water

• Hot Air

Heat to Power Ratio

• Ability to import/export power

• Variability of Demand Guascor Gas Engine CHP set

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 13 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Selecting the right technology

Heat to Power Ratio

• Recoverable heat depends on

technology

• Quantity

• Temperature

• Form

• Exhaust gas

• Cooling water circuits

1.0

0.5

2.0

3.0

4.0

6.0

5.0

Gas Engine

Gas Turbine

Gas Turbine with

supplementary

fired WHRU

Steam Turbine

Heat to Power Ratio

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 14 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Selecting the right technology

Type of Process Heat

Low Temperature Hot Water (LTHW)

• High overall efficiencies as heat recovery

from low temperature heat sources

High Temperature Hot Water (HTHW)

• Requires higher waste heat temperatures

than LTHW

Steam

• Needs high temperature heat source

(>100°C) increasing as pressure rises

Hot Air

• Direct or Indirect, Process or Space heating

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 15 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Selecting the right technology

Note: Highest electrical efficiency does not always give the

highest overall energy efficiency !

Brewery example: 7.5MW, 27 TPH saturated steam demand (10 bara)

Energy Efficiency (%)

Steam Production

(TPH)

20

40

80

60

10 20 30

11000 TPA

less CO2

> US$1.1 million/year

fuel saving

Gas Engine

Gas Turbine

Unrestricted © Siemens 2016Page 16

Combining Cogeneration technologies to

improve efficiency: Michigan, USA

Leveraging portfolio breadth to facilitate project development goals

Siemens Scope of Supply

(2) SGT-800 GTs, (1) SST-400 ST, 2 major LTP,

T3000 DCS, 3-GSU, 1-UAT, Switchgear, and

MCC

145MWNew power

generated via CHP

plant

~50%The CO2 emissions

reduction rate from

existing supplier

Challenge Solution

Coal-fired plant no longer

met city energy needs

Two SGT-800 and One

SST-400 provide cost-

efficient power

Underground snowmelt

system could not meet

energy demands

Waste heat from

circulating water system

provides heat for increased

snowmelt system

demands

Complex development

process

Provide “bundle buy”

solutions to facilitate

supply process

© Siemens AG 2017 All rights reserved.

2017-03-02Page 17 Michael Welch / Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd. AL: N ECCN: N

Selecting the right technology

Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions

CO2 is not the only GHG

Not all fuel is burned in the

combustion process

Methane is a potent GHG UHC emissions (methane slip)

Low in ‘continuous combustion’

equipment

Boilers and gas turbines

High in ‘intermittent

combustion’ equipment

Gas engines0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

NaturalGas

Diesel Propane NaturalGas +

3g/kWhMethane

Slip

Combustion Only

Life Cycle Emissions

CO2 released (kg/mmBtu)

Sources:

EIA 2007, US EPA 2009, GREET 1.8c

Will be higher if

methane

accepted as

being 35 times

worse GHG

than CO2

CO2eq Emissions

(tonnes per hour)

for 100MW power

@ 50% efficiency

37

51

44

49

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 18 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

What if I don’t have Natural Gas?

Many other fuels can be utilized, even in Low

Emissions combustors

Waste Gases and Byproducts

• Coke Oven Gas, Landfill Gas

• Ethane, Propane, NGLs, LPG

Liquid Fuels

• Diesel, HFO, Crude Oil

Syngas

• Energy from Waste, Coal, Biomass

Solid Fuels

• Coal, Biomass, MSW

Lower cost opportunity fuels

13MW class GT

• US$0.50/mmbtu lower fuel cost =

> US$0.5 million/year fuel bill reduction

University of New Hampshire

SGT-300 Tri-generation (Heat, Power and Cooling)

Capable of operation on Natural Gas, processed landfill

gas (high CO2.N2 content) or diesel fuels

Dry Low Emissions combustion

(<15ppm NOx on gaseous fuels)

Restricted © Siemens AG 2017

05.04.2017Page 19 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

What if I don’t have Natural Gas?

NOx Emissions

Flame temperature dependent

Propane and diesel have higher

energy content

than natural gas Hotter flame, higher NOx

NOx reduction in gas turbines by Dry

Low Emissions (DLE) combustion

technology

Multi-fuel capability

Natural gas

High Inert Gases

Ethane & Propane

Diesel

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

NOx(ppm)

Typical NOx ranges for Gas Turbines on different fuels

© Siemens AG 2017 All rights reserved.

2017-03-02Page 20 Michael Welch / Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd. AL: N ECCN: N

Propane and Diesel:

Gas Turbine DLE Comparison

NOx Emissions

Thermal NOx is dominant NOx

production method

Propane and diesel have hotter

flames than

natural gas

Propane lower than diesel

Using propane in a gaseous state

enables better fuel / air mixing Fewer hot spots

Lower peak flame temperatures

Propane less polluting than diesel0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

Relative NOx emissions

Natural Gas

Propane

Diesel

Comparison of relative NOx emissions for

the different fuel types for an SGT-700

with a DLE combustor

Equivalent to

170 tonnes/year

less NOx

operating on

propane

compared to

diesel

≈ 170

tonnes

/year

Equivalent to 0.5

million car

journeys of 10

miles

Restricted © Siemens AG 2015

2015-XX-XXPage 21 Author / CG PG

Combustion Emissions Comparison (tonnes/year)

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

NOx CO UHC Particulates Formaldehyde

Medium Speed SI Engine

50MW Class Aero-derivative GT DLE

50MW Class Industrial GT DLE

Natural Gas fuel

250MW Plant Output

7000 Hours/year operation

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 22 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Why consider ethane and propane as

primary or back-up fuels ?

“Reducing wood-burning,

gas-flaring and global

diesel emissions would be

‘quick win’ in combating

irreversible climate

change, scientists say”

The icesheet in the Ilulissat region of Greenland. The dark

patches are cryoconite, formed by windblown dust, soot and

ash particles that settle on the ice and turn the snow dark.

Photograph: Daniel Beltra

“Soot is behind human

health problems from

Beijing to Burundi”

21 December 2016

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 23 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

A case of extreme Fuel Flexibility

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5

CH4

C2H6

C3H8

C4H10

H2

30MW Gas Turbine CHP, PDH Plant,

China utilizing gases previously

flared

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 24 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Cogeneration helps solve the Energy

Trilemma

Security of

SupplyPrice of

Electricity

Environment

• Reduced Global CO2 emissions

• Reduced flaring of wastes gases

• Reduced energy

consumption

• Potential to use

low cost or

opportunity fuels

2 x SGT-400 and SST-300 steam

turbine CHP plant providing electricity,

heating and cooling for 60,000

residents in the Bronx area of New

York. The lights stayed on during

Hurricane Sandy

On-site generation of all

required energy – no

reliance on 3rd Party

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 25 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Summary

Energy efficiency through CHP helps address the Energy

Trilemma

• Environmental, Economic and Security of Supply

Benefits

Applicable to schemes of all sizes

Multiple technologies and combination of technologies

possible to optimize customer benefits

Unrestricted ©Siemens, 2016. All Rights Reserved.

04.05.2017Page 26 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Disclaimer

This document contains forward-looking statements and information – that is, statements related to future, not past,

events. These statements may be identified either orally or in writing by words as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”,

“plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “will” or words of similar meaning. Such statements are based on our current

expectations and certain assumptions, and are, therefore, subject to certain risks and uncertainties. A variety of factors,

many of which are beyond Siemens’ control, affect its operations, performance, business strategy and results and could

cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Siemens worldwide to be materially different from any future

results, performance or achievements that may be expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For us,

particular uncertainties arise, among others, from changes in general economic and business conditions, changes in

currency exchange rates and interest rates, introduction of competing products or technologies by other companies, lack

of acceptance of new products or services by customers targeted by Siemens worldwide, changes in business strategy

and various other factors. More detailed information about certain of these factors is contained in Siemens’ filings with the

SEC, which are available on the Siemens website, www.siemens.com and on the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov. Should

one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results

may vary materially from those described in the relevant forward-looking statement as anticipated, believed, estimated,

expected, intended, planned or projected. Siemens does not intend or assume any obligation to update or revise these

forward-looking statements in light of developments which differ from those anticipated.

Trademarks mentioned in this document are the property of Siemens AG, its affiliates or their respective owners.

TRENT® and RB211® are registered trade marks of and used under license from Rolls-Royce plc. Trent, RB211, 501 and

Avon are trade marks of and used under license of Rolls-Royce plc.

Restricted © Siemens AG 2017

05.04.2017Page 27 MJW / PG DG SPM NM

Mike Welch

Industry Marketing Manager

Siemens Industrial Turbomachinery Ltd.

Waterside South

Lincoln, United Kingdom

Phone: +44 (1522) 584000

Mobile: +44 (7921) 242234

E-mail: [email protected]

Thank you for your attention!

siemens.com/power-gas


Recommended