Date post: | 30-Jun-2015 |
Category: |
Technology |
Upload: | rininta-nurrachmi |
View: | 250 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Cointegration and Causality tests
for Islamic and Composite Indices in Malaysia
Author :
Rininta Nurrachmi (www.rininta-nurrachmi.blogspot.com)
Presenter :
Marhamah Muthohharoh
Presented in Conference of Islamic Economics and Finance from Global
Perspective
International Islamic University Malaysia
Saturday, 28 September 2013
Award
First Runner Up for Best Paper
Rininta Nurrachmi (The Author)
She held a Bachelor degree in Agriculture from Bogor Agricultural University (Indonesia) and a Master degree in Economics from International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Before continue her study in IIUM, she has worked for Market Research Company in Jakarta - Indonesia as Quantitative Research Executives, Project Director and Field Administrator.
Marhamah Muthoharoh (The Presenter)
She held a Bachelor degree in Agriculture from Bogor Agricultural University (Indonesia) and now pursuing her Master Degree in Economics at International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Before continue her study in IIUM, she has worked as a Research Assistant in International Center for Applied Finance and Economics (InterCAFE) IPB, Bogor, Indonesia. And as a Non-civil Servant Staff of Macroeconomic Policy Department of State Ministry of National Development Planning Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Introduction
• Background
1. The composite index and shariah index have the same movement during the crisis.
2. Most of the previous papers, elaborate the objective during global crisis which end on 2010.
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
EMAS SI KLCI
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
KLCI HIJRAH
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
6/1/2007 6/1/2008 6/1/2009 6/1/2010 6/1/2011 6/1/2012
HIJRAH EMAS SI
DATA MOVEMENT OF THREE INDICES
Research Objective
To investigate the existence of cointegration and causal direction among FBM KLCI, FBM Hijrah Index and FBM Emas Shariah Index after Bursa Malaysia joint forces with FTSE group.
Literature Review
The Relationship between Islamic and Composite indices
Albaity and Ahmad (2008), Hengchao and Hamid (2011), Chapakia and Sanrego (2007)
There is cointegration
Hakim and Rashidian (2002); Beik and Wardhana (2011)
There is absence of cointegration
Data and Methodology
• Model 𝐿𝑛(𝐶)𝑡= 𝛽0 + 𝛽1𝐿𝑛(𝐻)𝑡 + 𝛽2𝐿𝑛(𝐸)𝑡 + 𝜀𝑡
Ln(C) is natural logarithm for FBM KLCI, measured in local currency
Ln(H) is natural logarithm stock prices in FBM Hijrah Index measured in local currency
Ln(E) is natural logarithm stock closing prices in FBM EmasShariah Index measured in local currency.
Data and Methodology • Data
Duration of data : 1 June 2007 - 31 May 2013
Total sample size : 1479
Source of data : Bloomberg
• Methodology 1. VAR 2. Unit root test : ADF, PP, KPSS 3. Cointegration test : Julius – Johansen
Cointegration 4. Causality direction : short-run granger
causality test
Result and Discussion
• The existence of unit root Stationary at I(I)
• The absence of cointegration or no long-run relationship in the variables.
It indicates that the market is efficient and the error of one series cannot predict the movement of other indices
Unit Root Test Result Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) Test
Variables
Constant Trend
Level First-
Difference Conclusion Level First-Difference Conclusion
Ln(Composite) -0.475327 -20.70258*** I(1) -0.475327 -20.7537*** I(1)
Ln(Hijrah) -0.517702 -34.30003*** I(1) -1.570715 -34.32191*** I(1)
Ln(Emas) -0.450988 -33.99737*** I(1) -1.687256 -34.03908*** I(1)
Philip-Perron (PP) Test
Variables
Constant Trend
Level First-
Difference Conclusion Level First-Difference Conclusion
Ln(Composite) -0.428678 -34.43981*** I(1) -1.825535 -34.44221*** I(1)
Ln(Hijrah) -0.485319 -34.27527*** I(1) -1.543376 -34.29369*** I(1)
Ln(Emas) -0.485048 -34.08719*** I(1) -1.688878 -34.11343*** I(1)
Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KKPSS) Test
Variables
Constant Trend
Level First-
Difference Conclusion Level First-Difference Conclusion
Ln(Composite) 2.734449*** 0.307862 I(0) 0.490875*** 0.131435 I(0)
Ln(Hijrah) 2.377878*** 0.223554 I(0) 0.524364*** 0.080542 I(0)
Ln(Emas) 2.387278*** 0.29573 I(0) 0.525625*** 0.10107 I(0)
Cointegration Test Result
Null Hypothesis
Trace Max Eigenvalue
Cointegration
Rank
Critical Value
(5%)
Cointegration
Rank
Critical Value
(5%)
r = 0 24.01333 29.79707 18.27561 21.13162
r <= 1 5.737722 15.49471 4.490307 14.2646
r <= 2 1.247415 3.841466 1.247415 3.841466
Note: The lag order specified is 1 based on Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).
Causal Direction
Null Hypothesis F-Statistic P-Value Conclusion
(Hypothesis)
LNKLCI does not Granger Cause LNHIJRAH 2.04869 0.0853 Rejected
LNHIJRAH does not Granger Cause LNKLCI 1.14664 0.3329 Accepted
LNEMAS does not Granger Cause LNHIJRAH 2.4534 0.0442 Rejected
LNHIJRAH does not Granger Cause LNEMAS 1.04118 0.3846 Accepted
LNEMAS does not Granger Cause LNKLCI 1.79984 0.1263 Accepted
LNKLCI does not Granger Cause LNEMAS 1.94222 0.101 Accepted
FBM Hijrah Index
FBM KLCI
FBM Emas
Shariah Index
Conclusion
• The cointegration does not exist among the three variables.
• Unidirectional causality occurred between FBM KLCI towards FBM Hijrah index and between FBM Emas Shariah index towards Hijrah index.
• The decline of Shariah index due to crisis in global and domestic was a short-run relationship and it only occurred because of the shock from in FBM KLCI.
• Investing in Shariah compliant securities have attracted local and foreign investors.