Collider-Accelerator Department EBIS Commissioning Accelerator Readiness Review

(ARR)

Work PlanningHuman Performance

Ray KarolMay 2010

EBIS ARR

C-AD Work Planning

• Follows requirements of BNL SBMS Subject Area, Work Planning and Control for Experiments and Operations – 2.28 C-A Procedure for Work Planning and Control for Operations – 2.29 C-A Procedure for Enhanced Work Planning for

Experimenters– Work Planners take BNL training and C-AD training to become

a C-AD work planner Skill-of-worker Procedures Work Permit (Weekly and daily work planning meetings)

C-AD Work Planning

1. Define the scope of work

2. Identify the hazards and risks

3. Implement controls and perform

work within controls

4. Assess, communicate and

provide feedback

5. Take action for improvement

C-AD Work Planning

• Work screening guidance tailored to work at C-AD– 2.42 Liaison Engineer and Physicist: Project Engineer and P

hysicist; Liaison Scientist: Roles and Responsibilities– 2.28.d Work Screening Guidance– 2.28.h Screening Guide Card for Work Planning

• Completed EWPs are maintained by ESSHQ Division: – Reviewed by Assistant Work Control Manager by Tickler

Card to maintain records up to date, extend EWPs and ensure proper closeout of EWP – including Feedback as applicable

C-AD Work Planning

• Work screening guidance tailored to work at C-AD– 2.28.d Work Screening Guidance– 2.28.h Screening Guide Card for Work Planning

• Completed EWPs are maintained by ESSHQ Division: – Reviewed by Assistant Work Control Manager by Tickler

Card to maintain records up to date, extend EWPs and ensure proper closeout of EWP – including Feedback as applicable

C-AD Human Performance

• Human Performance Tools for Work Planning – heavily based on INPO guidance– 2.28.i Conducting Effective Pre-Job Briefings, Walk-Downs,

and Post-Job Previews– 2.28.j Human Performance Tools for C-AD Staff

• Completed EWPs are maintained by ESSHQ Division: – Reviewed by Assistant Work Control Manager by Tickler

Card to maintain records up to date, extend EWPs and ensure proper closeout of EWP – including Feedback as applicable

C-AD Human Performance

• Human Performance approach for Disciplinary Actions – uses “Just Cause” approach of INPO– 1.26 C-AD Standards for Disciplinary Action2.28.j

Human Performance Tools for C-AD Staff– 1.26.1C-AD Criteria for Application of Disciplinary Action

C-AD Human Performance

• C-AD began a human performance initiative in November 2005 • Fall 2005 - ESSHQ Division held five 2-hour training sessions for all

staff with other Department/Divisions also attending – very well received

• Using the HP principles from INPO* and James Reason**, C-AD created OPMs to assist staff in implementing Human Performance principles:

Conducting Effective Pre-Job Briefings, Walk-Downs and Post-Job Reviews

Human Performance Tools for C-AD Staff C-AD Criteria for Application of Disciplinary Action (just cause)* Institute of Nuclear Power Operations, Human Performance Fundamentals Course Reference, 2002** James Reason, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, 1997

C-AD Human Performance

• Summer 2007 – C-AD hired Rob Fisher to train 50 Manager/Supervisors and 50 workers in Human Performance

• Fall 2007 – BNL initiated lab-wide training using Rob Fisher• Spring/Summer 2008 – C-AD sent 4 staff for Human

Performance Advocate, 2 continued on to become certified trainers

• September 2008 C-AD trainers begin teaching C-AD staff• FY07 and FY08 - The C-AD Work Control Manager held 1-

hour sessions for C-AD staff each FY focusing on human performance tools used for work planning

Forward Looking Indicators

EXAMPLE PRACTICES:• Safety Meetings• ESRC/ASSRC/RSC • WOSH Committee• Disciplinary Rules• Work Planning• Manager Work Observations• Management Review• Assessments• Critiques • Security Committee• Human Performance Training• HPI Committee• Power Walks• …

Best safe companies have 25 to 40 practices Practices may change/improve with time

Backward looking Indicators

Collective Dose, person-rem

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

Year

Pers

on-r

em

Annual Number of C-AD Occurrences

02468

1012

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

C-AD Annual Injury Rates, # per 100 FTE

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

6.00

May-90 Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01 Jan-04 Oct-06 Jul-09 Apr-12

DART

TRC

Questions ?