Date post: | 25-May-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gohar-feroz-khan |
View: | 465 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Social Media Use in Public Sector: A comparative study of Korean and US government agencies
Authors: Gohar Feroz Khan, Ho Young Yoon, Han Woo Park
Prepared for: ATHS panel during the 8th International Conference on Webometrics, Informatics and Scientometrics & 13th COLLNET Meeting, 23-26 October 2012, Seoul,South Korea
Presenter: Gohar Feroz Khan School of Industrial Management
Korea University of Technology & Education (KoreaTECH), 1600 Chungjol-ro Byungcheon-myunCheonan city, 330-708, South Korea
Table of Contents
IntroductionWeb 2.0 & Social MediaS-government
Cultural PerspectiveResearch QuestionMethodResultsDiscussion
Introduction
Social Media Based on Web 2.0 Concept
Helps to maintain social and professional
ties e.g., Facebook and LinkedIn
facilitate knowledge sharing e.g., Wikipedia and blogs
create awareness e.g., Twitter
Social Media & Web 2.0
Web 1.0
Web 2.0
Social Media
SNS, blogs, wikis
One way communication
Enforce Two way communication
Enforce social context
(Khan, working paper)
All SNS are web 2.0, but not all web 2.0 are SNS!
ICT based government full picture
Traditional Government
E-Government
M-governmentGovernment 2.0
S-government
Paper-Based
Static ICTs & Web 1.0 Based
Web 2.0 & Social Media Based
Mobile ICTs Based
Khan, working paper
Why S-government?
S-government
Participative
Collaborative
Low Cost/
Convenience
Greater Transparency
Social Government studies
Many studies in mono-cultural settingsthe U.S. (Golbeck et al., 2010; Whalen, 2012)Korea (Cho & Park, 2012) and the Netherlands (Effing et al., 2011)
But, limited studies in cross-cultural settings
Cultural Dimensions
Cross-cultural use of social media in public sector Collectivist V.S Individualistic
(Hofstede, 1984) use of social media
Social Media use patterns and strategies in East V.S West?
Korea V.S. the USA
Korea is a hierarchical, collectivistic, and feminine society that avoids uncertainty and emphasizes collectivism
the U.S. is a non-hierarchical, individualistic, and masculine society that accepts uncertainty and emphasizes individualism
Research Questions (RQs)
What is the nature of social media use in the public sector in Western (USA) and Asian (Korean) cultures?
What are the social media strategies of government agencies in Western (USA) and Asian (Korean) cultures?
Method
DataWe obtained the data (Tweets) from Twitter
accounts maintained by government agencies in Korea (40 agencies) and the U.S. (32 agencies).
We collected the data between February and August 2011TweetsProfile information (the numbers of followings,
followers, lists, and Tweets)
Method
AnalysisWebometrics and Social Network AnalysisKey word analysisOut-link analysis
ToolsWebometrics AnalystNodeXL
Results
Follow-Following Network
Figure 1: Follow-following network diagram of Korean and US public sector organizations
Social media are not yet a preferred medium of inter-country communications
Results
Follow-Following Network Properties
No. of Nodes
No. of Links
Density Average Geodesic Distance
Average Degree
Average Centrality
Clustering Coefficient
40 1348 0.86 1.0 33 3.6 0.86
No. of Nodes
No. of Links
Density Average Geodesic Distance
Average Degree
Average Centrality
Clustering Coefficient
32 255 0.26 1.45 7.9 12 0.50
Table 1. Network Level Properties of Korean Twitter Networks
Table 2. Network Level Properties of US Twitter Networks
Correlations USA Korea(1) Followings-followers -0.104 0.996**
(2) Followings-tweets 0.07 0.356*
(3) Followers-tweets 0.524** 0.339*
(4) Followings-listed -0.097 0.865**
(5) Followers-listed 0.956** 0.877**
(6) Tweets-listed 699** 0.202 Followings-Favorites 0.348 0.204Followers-Favorites -0.111 0.183Tweets-Favorites 0.37 0.245Listed-Favorites -0.094 0.069 Descriptive Statistics Reciprocity Ratio 3.96% 80.98%
Table 3. Correlation analysis
*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Korean government institutions strategically pursued reciprocal relationships with their followers
Out-links-Korea
Figure 2. Outlink diagram (Korean)
Out-links-USA
Keywords shared by ministries (USA)
Keywords shared by ministries (Korea)
Conclusion
Different usage patterns observed in Collectivist V.S Individualistic settings
Korean ministriesWell connectedRe-enforce collective agenda
E.g. through re-tweeting common contents
Avoid uncertaintyE.g. mostly link government sources of information
Return FavorE.g. if you follow me, I will follow you
Conclusion
US Ministries Sparsely connectedIndividualist Use
e.g. retweeted messages that specifically fit the purpose of each department
Embrace uncertainty e.g. Link private sources of information to inform the
public of its activities
Do not Return Favore.g. if you follow me, I may not follow you
Conclusion
Other findingsInteractions based on social media in the public
sector appear to be informational in nature• e.g. social media is used to provide links to other
sources of information, including news sites, blogs, and government websites, and to raise awareness of public policies.
However, future research should investigate the potential use of social media beyond its informational use (e.g., for transactions).
Thank You (Manana)
Comments & suggestions are welcomed
References
Cho, S. and H. Park (2012). "Government organizations’ innovative use of the Internet: The case of the Twitter activity of South Korea’s Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries." Scientometrics 90(1): 1-15.
Effing, R., J. van Hillegersberg, et al. (2011). Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? Electronic Participation. E. Tambouris, A. Macintosh and H. de Bruijn, Springer Berlin / Heidelberg. 6847: 25-35.
Golbeck, J., J. M. Grimes, et al. (2010). "Twitter use by the U.S. Congress." Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(8): 1612-1621.
Khan, G.F, working paper. Govt. 2.0 explained: implementation scenarios, model, relationships, and more.
Whalen, R. (2012). Organizational Structure as a Multiplex Network: The case of the US federal government. International Communication Association (ICA)-2012 Communication and Community. Phoenix, AZ.