+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comments from DOE’s Office of Science

Comments from DOE’s Office of Science

Date post: 23-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: nituna
View: 49 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Comments from DOE’s Office of Science. Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of the Americas December 11, 2013. Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.energy.gov/sc-2/presentations-and-testimony/. Office of Science. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
15
Comments from DOE’s Office of Science Superconducting Particle Accelerator Forum of the Americas December 11, 2013 Dr. Patricia M. Dehmer Acting Director, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy http://www.science.energy.gov/sc-2/presentations-and-testimony/
Transcript
Page 1: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

Comments from DOE’s Office of Science

Superconducting Particle AcceleratorForum of the Americas

December 11, 2013

Dr. Patricia M. DehmerActing Director, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy

http://www.science.energy.gov/sc-2/presentations-and-testimony/

Page 2: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

Office of Science

2

The Frontiers of Science

Supporting research that led to over 100 Nobel Prizes during the past 6 decades—more than 20 in the past 10 years

Supporting 25,000 Ph.D. scientists, graduate students, undergraduates, engineers, and support staff at more than 300 institutions

Providing 45% of Federal support of basic research in the physical and energy related sciences and key components of the Nation’s basic research in biology and computing

21st Century Tools of Science

Providing the world’s largest collection of scientific user facilities to over 29,000 users each year

2

SC touches more people through its user facilities than it does through direct funding

Page 3: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

3

Office of Science Budget by Research & Facilities>40% of SC funding is provided to the scientific user facilities

User facilities address needs of the scientific community not met by other government agencies, public organizations, private entities, or international bodies.

Facility construction and major instrumentation

Page 4: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

NSLS

NSLS-II

Some of the Office of Science User Facilities

NuMI Beamline, FNAL; NERSC Computing Center, LBNL; NSTX, PPPL; STAR Detector, RHIC, BNL; APS, ANL; SNS SC linac, ORNL; NSLS-II, BNL,

4

Page 5: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

5

SC User Facilities and the DOE Laboratories

Page 6: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

6

Distribution of Users at the ~30 SC FacilitiesNearly ¾ of users do their work at ASCR or BES facilities

SSRLALSAPSNSLSLCLSHFIRLujanSNSCNMFoundryCNMSCINTCFNNERSCOLCFACLFTevatronFACETB-FactoryRHICTJNAF ATLASEMSLJGIARMDIII-DC-ModNSTX

FES

SSRL

ALS

APS

NSLS

HFIRLujan

SNS

NSRCsNERSC

OLCF

ALCF

Tevatron

B-Factory

RHIC

TJNAF

ATLAS

EMSLJGI

ARM DIII

-DA

lcat

or

Light Sources

Neutron Sources

NanoCenters

ComputingFacilities

High energy physics facilities

Nuclear physicsfacilities

Bio & EnviroFacilities

LCLS

Does not include LHC; HEP supports about 1,700 scientists, technicians, and engineers at the LHC.

Page 7: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

'82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89 '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

LCLS

APS

ALS

SSRL

NSLS

Fiscal Year

Num

ber o

f Use

rsUsers by Facility at the Light Sources

NSLS 1982SSRL 1974 & 2004 LCLS 2009

7

ALS 1993 APS 1996

Page 8: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

BESAC Report on “Future X-Ray Light Sources”

and the DOE Actions

Patricia DehmerActing Director, Office of Science

Harriet KungDirector, Office of Basic Energy Sciences

Jim MurphyDirector, BES Scientific User Facility Division

Snippets from the BESAC

Light Source Report

Page 9: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

Charge to BESAC on X-ray Light Sources

On January 2, 2013, Bill Brinkman, then the Director of the Office of Science, issued a charge to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee (BESAC).

The charge requested: An assessment of the grand science challenges that could best be explored with current and

possible future SC light sources. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the present SC light source portfolio to meet these grand

science challenges. An enumeration of future light source performance specifications that would maximize the

impact on grand science challenges. Prioritized recommendations on which future light source concepts and the technology behind

them are best suited to achieve these performance specifications. Identification of prioritized research and development initiatives to accelerate the realization of

these future light source facilities in a cost effective manner.

John Hemminger, the Chair of BESAC, served as Chair of a 22 member Subcommittee, which used previous BESAC and BES reports and new input from the x-ray sciences communities to formulate findings and recommendations.

The final report was accepted by BESAC on July 25, 2013.

9

Page 10: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

BESAC – Findings

At the present time, the U.S. enjoys a significant leadership role in the x-ray light source community. This is a direct result of the successes of the major facilities managed by BES for the U.S. This leadership position is due to the science successes of the storage ring facilities and the particularly stunning success of the first hard x-ray free electron laser, the Linac Coherent Light Source (LCLS). However, it is abundantly clear that international activity in the construction of new diffraction limited* storage rings and new free electron laser facilities will seriously challenge U.S. leadership in the decades to come.

The U.S. will no longer hold a leadership role in such facilities unless new unique facilities are developed as recommended by the BESAC facilities prioritization report.

10

* To upgrade an existing storage ring to one that is diffraction limited will require the replacement of the entire lattice to greatly reduce the electron source size and angular divergence in order to maximize the x-ray beam brightness.

Page 11: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

BESAC – Recommendations

For free electron lasers: In spite of the present intensely competitive environment, an exciting window of opportunity exists for the U.S. to provide a revolutionary advance in x-ray science by developing and constructing an unprecedented x-ray light source. This new light source should provide high repetition rate, ultra-bright, transform limited, femtosecond x-ray pulses over a broad photon energy range with full spatial and temporal coherence. Stability and precision timing will be critical characteristics of the new light source.

The best approach for a light source would be a linac-based, seeded, free electron laser. The linac should feed multiple, independently tunable undulators each of which could service multiple endstations. The new light source must have pulse characteristics and high repetition rate to carry out a broad range of “pump

probe” experiments, in addition to a sufficiently broad photon energy range (~0.2 keV to ~5.0 keV).

For storage rings: At best the present plans for upgrades of U.S. storage rings will leave the U.S. behind the international community in this area of x-ray science. BES should ensure that U.S. storage ring x-ray sources reclaim their world leadership position. This will require a careful evaluation of present upgrade plans to determine paths forward that will guarantee that U.S. facilities remain at the cutting edge of x-ray storage ring science.

11

Page 12: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

BESAC RecommendationsHow U.S. and International Light Sources Address the Recommendations

BESACRecommendations

LCLS-II(Before)

LCLS-II(After)

NGLS SACLA EUXFEL

PALXFEL

SWISSFEL

Seeded & Transform Limited Free Electron Laser High Rep Rate ~1 MHz Broad Spectral Range – at least 0.2-5 keV Multiple, Tunable Undulators

The new LCLS-II is the only FEL addressing all of the BESAC recommendations.

Page 13: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

13

4 Nobel Prizes in Biochemistry with SC Storage Ring Light Sources& the Prospect of Single-Molecule, Single-Shot Imaging with FELs

Roderick MacKinnon (Chemistry) for “structural and mechanistic studies of ion channels.”

Roger Kornberg (Chemistry) "for his studies of the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription.”

Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas A. Steitz, and Ada E. Yonath (Chemistry) "for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome.”

Robert J. Lefkowitz and Brian K. Kobilka (Chemistry) "for studies of G-protein-coupled receptors.”

2003

2006

2009

2012

HN Chapman et al. Nature 470, 73-77 (2011)

Single Shot Diffraction Pattern Reconstructed Image

The visualized transcription process.

The 50S subunit at 2.4Å resolution.

The overall view of a voltage-dependent potassium ion channel.

The structure of the β2AR-Gs complex.

The structure of the β2AR-Gs complex.

The Experiment

Nob

el P

rizes

with

SC

st

orag

e rin

gs in

pro

tein

st

ruct

ures

Early

exp

erim

ents

in

sing

le-m

olec

ule,

sin

gle-

shot

imag

ing

at L

CLS

Page 14: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

The Linac Coherent Light Source at SLAC

14

SLAC Linac

14

LCLS Near Experimental Hall and Far Experimental Hall

Expanded section shown on Slide 11

Page 15: Comments from  DOE’s Office of Science

LCLS-II Upgrade After BESAC Report: New 4 GeV SC linac; 1 soft x-ray & 1 hard x-ray undulator in the existing tunnel

New 4 GeV superconducting linac and new high repetition rate injector

Existing 14 GeV normal conducting linac and injector

15

New soft x-ray and hard x-ray undulators

Existing undulator tunnel; Near & Far Experimental Halls; and 6 Instruments

1.0- 5 keV (100 kHz)1.0- 20 keV (120 Hz)

0.2-1.2 keV (100 kHz)


Recommended