COMMITTEE ON MATERIALS AND PAVEMENTS MINUTES ......equipment tires in front of the pavers screed...

COMMITTEE ON MATERIALS AND PAVEMENTS

MINUTES (In Red Ink)

Meeting (Annual or Mid-Year) Annual – Virtual Meeting

Date Friday, July 31, 2020

Scheduled Time 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM EDT

Technical Subcommittee & Name 4e – Joints, Bearings, and Geosynthetics

Chair Name and (State) Timothy Ramirez (Pennsylvania)

Vice Chair Name and (State) Vacant

Research Liaison Name and (State) Danny Lane (Tennessee)

I. Introduction and Housekeeping – Casey opened the meeting at 11:02 am EDT and performed the

standard housekeeping items. She thanked the Chair and TS for their work during the year.

II. Call to Order and Opening Remarks

A. Brief Summary of Activities (Briefly explain the goals of today’s meeting and what you hope to accomplish. Get everyone up to speed and on

the same page.) Meeting followed the 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda. See Appendix A (Pages 13-21).

III. Roll Call of Voting Members – This will be done electronically. Ninety-seven (97) participants were on

webinar at this time. See Appendix B (Pages 22-24) for complete webinar meeting roster.

Present Member Name (Proxy) State Present Member Name State ☒ Robert G. Lauzon CT ☒ Clark S. Morrison NC

☒ Richard Douds (Monica Flournoy) GA ☒ Kenny R. Seward OK

☒ Daniel H. Tobias IL ☒ Timothy Ramirez PA

☒ Richard A. Barezinsky KS ☒ Danny L. Lane TN

☒ Jason Davis LA ☒ John Schuler VA

☒ Clement Fung MA ☒ Kurt Williams (Tony Allen) WA

☒ James S. Williams, III (Alan Kegley / John Blakely)

MS ☒ Anne Holt Ontario

☒ Brett S. Trautman MO ☐

☒ Ross (Oak) Metcalfe MT ☐

☒ F. Steven Heiser NY ☐

Quorum Rules Met?

Annual Meeting: Simple majority of voting members (☒y/ ☐n) | Mid-Year Meeting: Voting members present (☐y/ ☐n)

A. Review of Membership (New members, exiting members, etc.) – Monica Flournoy (GA) sent in a note that

she is replacing Richard Douds who retired. The Chair went over the changes below:

1. James Williams (MS) – Retired.

2. Michael Benson (AR), Vice Chair – Retired July 17, 2020.

a. Looking for volunteer to serve as Vice Chair.

3. Anne Holt (Ontario) replaced Becca Lane (Ontario)

4. Jonathan Curry (Industrial Fabrics Association International) – Now with ACEC Minnesota

5. Chair not aware of any other new voting members or exiting voting members.

6. If anyone wishes to be a member of TS 4e, please contact Casey Soneira ([email protected])

Technical Subcommittee 4e Annual Meeting 2020 Page 1 of 26

mailto:[email protected]

IV. Approval of Technical Subcommittee Minutes

TS 4e 2019 Mid-Year Webinar Meeting Minutes (December 12, 2019) – See TS 4e 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda and

its Attachment A (8 Pages) – A motion was made by MO and seconded by OK to approve the minutes.

Motion passed.

V. Old Business

A. COMP Ballot Items (Include any ASTM changes/equivalencies, including ASTM standards’ revision years.)

COMP Ballot # Standard

Results (neg/affirm) Comments/Negatives Action

COMP 19-03 Item 23

M 33, Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for Concrete (Bituminous Type)

0/41 (10 No Vote)

See TS-4e 2019-2020 Mid-Year Meeting Minutes for comments.

The Chair noted all comments except one technical comment were addressed editorially and are included in the published M 33M/M 33-20. The one technical comment from Virginia regarding a Section 6.1 tolerance is included as a proposed concurrent ballot item in Section VI. C of agenda.

COMP 19-03 Item 24

M 153, Preformed Sponge Rubber, Cork, and Recycled Rubber Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction

0/41 (10 No Votes)


The Chair noted that all comments were addressed editorially and are included in the published M 153-20. No further action necessary.

COMP 19-03 Item 25

R 69, Determination of Long-Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement

0/41 (10 No Votes)


The Chair noted that all comments were addressed editorially and included in the published R 69-20. No further action necessary.

B. Technical Subcommittee Ballots

TS Ballot # Standard


COMP TS 4e 20-01 Item 1

M 213, Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS Ballot based on ASTM equivalency review to go from referencing ASTM D1751-04(2013) to referencing ASTM D1751-18. No comments received.

TS to consider for a COMP Ballot Item. A motion was made by KS and seconded by OK to approve this for a COMP Ballot. Motion passed.





Bituminous Types)


M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS ballot to remove definitions and requirements for “enhancement” and “Class 1A” geotextile; to add definitions for geogrid and geotextile; to add references to the AASHTO NTPEP Subgrade Stabilization Work Plan (SSGEO); to add text for “soil” stabilization; to add new Section 12 and Table 12 for geotextile and geogrid requirements for subgrade stabilization (Class 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D) and to replace the previous “enhancement” requirements; to editorially revise Section X1.1.3.1 for better phrasing; and to editorially revise/update language in Section 10.1 and throughout Section X1.6 when referencing asphalt binders, cutback asphalts, emulsified asphalts, and asphalt mixture. Revisions proposed by Mr. Scott Hidden (NC), Chair AASHTO NTPEP TC on Geosynthetics (GTX, REGEO, and SSGEO). Proposed revisions were based on GMA consensus document. Comments received from GA, KS, LA, MO, PA, & VA.

See last row below for this TS Ballot Item.

Georgia: It is recommended that Section 10 - Paving Fabric be (re)moved. Also, please consider the removal of appendix X 1.6.1.1 through 1.6.3.15 for the following reasons: Based on our agency’s bad experience from multiple paving fabric projects, the method dealing with wrinkle has an installation issue in the field. More specifically, all curves section of paving fabric had wrinkle issues since fabric rolls are placed in straight line by a mechanical applicator while the roadway always has curves which caused a lot of wrinkles. The installer cut fabric many times manually during paving and tried to “iron out the wrinkles” without much success. In addition, all paving fabric were picked up by construction equipment and had to be removed later. Even the sections with smoothly installed fabric, the asphalt pavement shows cracks and delamination. Most of time, once the contractor began

TS to discuss. Chair recommends that Section 10 and Appendix X1.6 remain in M 288 due to use by other agencies and local/municipal governments. The Chair recognized the comment by GA. GA stated that the material picks up and causes more harm than good and that it should be removed from M 288. The Chair had recommended to keep it in. PA has had similar experiences as GA but municipalities use this so should leave it in. Clark Morrison (NC) and Ken Seward (OK) recommended to leave it in. Fred Chuck (GMS) stated that GMA has an Interlayer Task Force that would be willing to make some suggestions to update the Paving Fabric section.





overlaying the fabric with asphalt, it was observed that the fabric was being picked by paving equipment’s tires, such as trucks, and materials transfer device (MTV). The fabric manufacturer’s field rep had the contractor throw asphalt on the fabric in front of the paving equipment tries to prevent pick up (the procedure as stated in the appendix X 1.6). But as we know, this is normally considered to be improper paving practices because the asphalt compacted by the paving equipment tires in front of the pavers screed contributed to inconsistent compaction and bad ride (a smoothness issue). Further inspection of those paving fabric projects revealed cracks and tears in the finished mat. This was most likely caused by the fabric not adhering to the wrinkled surface of the fabric and blemishes left in the fabric by construction equipment. Because the paver had to sit for an extending amount of time while the fabric was being cut and removed manually, the asphalt mix in the hopper was allowed to cool prior to placement. This chilled asphalt caused surface blemished in the mat. In summary, the paving fabric DID MORE HARM THAN GOOD to asphalt pavement quality.

Decision made to leave Paving Fabric in M 288 for now.

Kansas: 2.2 ASTM D4884 can be removed as it is no longer referenced in this specification

The Chair agreed and removed ASTM D4884/D4884M from Section 2.2 as ASTM D4884/D4884M was referenced in Table 6 (now proposed to be deleted).

Louisiana: As the current version includes Class 1 as the highest and Class 3 as the lowest strength, will including Class 4 for some of the strongest materials lead to confusion, or is it just an arbitrary number? I don't have any definite solution except to refer to the category as something other than "4". Perhaps Class S or Class ST. We've used the Class 1 - 3 for so long, I don't recommend renumbering the original classes.

The Chair recognized LA comment (on the left) and it was discussed. LA spoke that they use a different lettering system and they didn’t have a major concern with the new numbering system but just wanted to discuss it. With no one bringing up any concerns, the Chair indicated the existing and proposed geotextile classes will remain and be moved forward.

Missouri: Affirmative with one editorial comment:

The Chair agreed and the editorial change was made.





1) On Page 16, Table 12, the description over the Classes (i.e. 4A, 4B, 4C & 4D) states the following: "Geosynthetic Classa, b and Types" It appears the lower case letters 'a' and 'b' need to be superscript.

Pennsylvania: 1) PennDOT will continue to follow PennDOT Publication 408, Section 735 (Geotextiles) and Section 738 (Geogrids) for geosynthetics and not adopt M 288.

PA comment was reviewed. No action required. They will continue to use the PA specification.

Virginia: I suggest voting yes. However, please address the following question: As for the wide tensile strength for geogrid, the draft section (12.3) has "Values for Geogrid Wide Width Tensile Strength are the sum of the values for the wide width tensile strengths in the machine and cross machine direction." Why is the sum value used in classifying the different classes of geogrid? Geotextile uses tensile strength in the weakest principal direction... Is there any reason that the sum value instead of the weakest value should be used for geogrid? Also, please see below a minor editorial change that we are proposing: 12.1 - change "coincident functions" to dual primary functions (to be consistent with the change made in 8.4.1

The Chair recognized VA comment regarding Section 12.3: The sum value came from the GMA Consensus Specification for Geogrid Subgrade Stabilization. Scott Hidden (NC) noted this was taken from the Stabilization document. Fred Chuck (GMA) stated they were trying to make sure that it was not an unbalanced grid. John Lostumbo stated he was on the GMA TF and while it seems strange they agreed on the sum value for wide width tensile strength and minimum Tensile Strength at 2% strain so it was balanced. Scott Hidden (NC) stated they could ask the GMA if there would be an issue with revising this to a minimum Wide Width Tensile Strength in the weakest direction. Chuck stated they could ask. The min Tensile Strength at 2% strain was in the consensus document. John Lostumbo (Tencate) stated the sum value and the Tensile Strength at 2% strain was published in the 2018 property tables. The Chair addressed this part of VA Comments stating Section 12.1 is not exactly the same as Section 8.4.1. Section 8.4.1 is for soil stabilization with geotextiles only; whereas,





Section 12.1 is both geogrids and geotextiles, so the wording doesn't seem like it can be exactly the same. After some discussion, it was decided to keep language as proposed in Section 12.1.

M 288 overall The Chair asked how the TS wanted to proceed with M 288. MO motioned to move forward as a COMP Ballot since there were no negatives. There was some discussion on a possible change to the sum value language. Discussion by Scott Hidden (NC) indicated he was not opposed but to ask the GMA about min sum values and corresponding tensile strength at 2% strain. AASHTO recommended a possible amended motion to incorporate a change if warranted. MO amended the motion to send to COMP Ballot if no change, Concurrent Ballot if there is a change. OK seconded. Scott Hidden (NC) mentioned that VA comment on sum value is valid. GMA can provide comments on this after the meeting. Scott Hidden (NC) also indicated that the last sentence in the proposed Section 12.3 should be moved to a table footnote if the sum value language remains. The Chair agreed. Tony Allen (WA) agreed with NC, the sum value is unusual for geogrids but not geotextiles. This does not appear to be what GMA wants to accomplish. Tony also agreed that last sentence in proposed Section 12.3 should be a table footnote. Motion passed. Fred Chuck stated they will review and have an answer by mid to end of August. Post Annual Meeting: In an email from Fred Chuck dated 8/20/2020,





Fred Chuck stated “The GMA Focus Groups discussed your request and drafted the response. After review, the GMA Executive Council has approved the language below. The GMA Geogrid Standard Specification for Geogrid for Subgrade Stabilization Applications was the result of the GMA Geogrid Focus group (GGFG) working to develop a consensus document representing all participating members. One area of compromise was the ultimate tensile strength requirement. In order to define distinct geogrid classes given the wide range of machine and cross machine strengths and multiple aperture shapes in the market, it was agreed to use a cumulative value. This was based on an evaluation of a comprehensive database of geogrid styles and strength properties. The focus group agreed that using a MD + CD cumulative value for ultimate but a minimum principle direction value for the 2% strength avoided the potential for a uniaxial material or something with a very low strength in one direction from being used and produces three distinct classes each representing a different level of survivability. We understand that this was a novel approach and appreciate the points/concerns raised by the members during the AASHTO TS 4e meeting. Still, all manufactures/suppliers report MARV strengths in both the machine-direction (MD) and the cross machine-direction (CD) so simply adding the readily available MD and CD values should not be an issue in the market and will assure that M288 reflects the consensus views of industry. Nonetheless, should the members of TS 4e have a strong preference for specifying MARV ultimate strength in the minimum principle direction instead of the cumulative machine direction and cross machine direction MARV strength, the GMA GGFG would





welcome the opportunity to participate in determining the appropriate specification values. To this end, the GMA GGFG recommends the use of the following minimum principle direction MARV values: 26 kN/m, 18 kN/m and 12 kN/m for 4B, 4C and 4D, respectively. FYI, two independent comments regarding the language were received with the review responses and are included here for your consideration: “Would like to propose there is language stating that a separation geotextile should be used in combination with any geogrids. If AASHTO will accept a recommendation, a Class 2 or 3 nonwoven should be used.” “… supports the expression of the Ultimate values being expressed as Marv values, in the weakest principle direction. This is consistent with all other Marv values on table 12 and indeed with M288.””


MP 25, Performance-Graded Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS ballot proposing to adopt as a full standard (M XXX) with revisions to update reference to R 95 (formerly T 367). No comments received.

A motion was made by KS and seconded by CT for a COMP Ballot with editorial change. Motion passed.

C. Reconfirmation Ballots – The Chair noted that all reconfirmation ballots passed and the results are

shown below.

Reconf. Ballot # Standard


TS 4e 19-01 Item 1

M 168, Wood Products

0/15 (3 No Votes)

None Published as M 168-07 (2020).

TS 4e 19-01 Item 2

M 230, Expanded and Extruded Foam Board (Polystyrene)

0/15 (3 No Votes)


TS 4e 19-01 Item 3

M 251, Plain and Laminated

0/15 (3 No Votes)



C. Reconfirmation Ballots – The Chair noted that all reconfirmation ballots passed and the results are

shown below.



Elastomeric Bridge Bearings

TS 4e 19-01 Item 4

MP 26, Cotton Duck Fabric Bridge Bearings

0/15 (3 No Votes)

None Published as MP 26-15 (2020).

D. Task Force Reports

Task Force # Title Members Status/Update

TF 15-1 M 288 revisions to include geogrid for base reinforcement, address comments from ASTM D35 committee received from Jim Goddard, include geotextile for wrapping pipe, and other revisions.

Tim Ramirez, Chair (PA), Tom Burnett (NY), Chris Peoples and Scott Hidden (NC), Tony Allen (WA), Jonathan Curry (GMA), Daniel Selander (Thrace-LINK and Chair GMA Geotextile Focus Group), Mike Clements (Huesker, Inc.), Jim Goddard (Consultant), and AASHTO NTPEP Technical Committee on Geosynthetics (GTX & REGEO) Representatives: John Schuler (VA) and Rodrigo Herrara (FL).

The chair received redline revisions on M 288 from Scott Hidden (NC). These revisions included terminology section revisions, reference to the AASHTO NTPEP Audit Program for Subgrade Stabilization (SSGEO), Table 1 revisions to remove Class 1A geotextile, removal of “enhancement” requirements, and addition of new Section 12 for geotextile and geogrid requirements for subgrade stabilization. TS discussion recommended these revisions be balloted on a Technical Subcommittee ballot first before being COMP balloted. Chair issued COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS ballot (Ballot Start Date 6/29/2020 and Ballot Due Date 7/20/2020) which included M 288 with these revisions.

TF 19-1 M 251 alignment with AASHTO NTPEP Elastomeric Bridge Bearing (EBB) Technical Committee Workplan.

Lead: Katheryn Malusky (AASHTO) TS4e: Tim Ramirez (PA), Daniel Tobias (IL), Mike Stelzer (NY), Angela Beyke (VA), Ralph Dornsife (WA) NTPEP EBB: Joseph Stillwell (ME), Aaron Bonk (WI), Karl Janak (TX), Robert Anderson (Scougal Rubber), Brad Streeter (D.S. Brown), Robert Sarcinella (NTPEP). COBS T-2: Sara Manning (AL), Kevin Reichers (IL). COBS T-4: Bill Dreher (WI) - Retired.

TF held conference call on July 14, 2020 and discussed primary issues with current M 251. Dan Tobias (IL) agreed to prepare a draft revised “strawman” M 251. Dan Tobias provided draft revised “strawman” M 251 to the TF on July 23, 2020 for review. TF to schedule another meeting August 25th and should have a Technical Subcommittee ballot in the spring of 2021.

VI. New Business

A. AASHTO re:source/CCRL/NTPEP (Observations from assessments, as applicable.) – No reports.

B. Presentation by Industry/Academia

1. No presentations were given.


C. Revisions/Work on Standards for Coming Year

Standard # Title Task/Summary Assigned to

M 33M/M 33 Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for Concrete (Bituminous Type)

Revise Section 6.1 tolerance for thickness from “+1 mm to 0 mm [1/16 in. to 0 in.]” to “±1 mm [1/16 in.]” to match referenced equivalent ASTM D994/D994M-11(2016), Section 6.1 thickness tolerance. Concurrent ballot item. See TS 4e 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda and its Attachment B (2 Pages). A motion was made by CT, seconded by KS to send this to Concurrent Ballot. Motion passed.

PA

M 213 Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient Bituminous Types)

ASTM Equivalency Review to go from ASTM D1751-04(2013) to ASTM D1751-18. Chair completed equivalency review and issued revisions on COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. This will be a future COMP Ballot Item (See Section V.B, 1st row in table).

MO, PA

M 288 Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications

Due for Reconfirmation. Revisions issued on COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. COMP Ballot Item.

NY

M 297 Preformed Polychloroprene Elastomeric Joint Seals for Bridges

ASTM Equivalency Review to go from ASTM D3542-08(2013) to ASTM D3542-08(2019). Chair completed equivalency review and found only one minor editorial change in ASTM D3542-08(2019), Table 1, Footnote D. Chair touched base with AASHTO Publications on how to revise AASHTO Standard Designation Year. AASHTO Publications advised issuing on Reconfirmation Ballot including revision to reference ASTM D3542-08(2019).

PA

T 368 Measuring Low-Temperature Flexural Creep Stiffness of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR)

Reconfirmation due. PA, AR

T 369 Evaluation of the Low-Temperature Tensile Property of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Direct Tension Test


T 371 Measuring Interfacial Fracture Energy of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant Using a Blister Test


MP 25 Performance-Graded Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

Reconfirmation due. Chair revised and issued on COMP TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. Ballot includes revision to adopt as full standard and revise reference from T 367 to R 95. COMP Ballot Item.

PA, AR

MP 26 Cotton Duck Fabric Bridge Bearings

Reconfirmation due. AR

PP 85 Grading or Verifying the Sealant Grade (SG)




of a Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

TP 126 Evaluation of the Tracking Resistance of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)


D. Review of Stewardship List – The Chair went over the Stewardship listing. See Appendix C (Pages 25-

26).

1. A new Technical Subcommittee will be formed within COMP to address Erosion Control Product standards and the new Technical Subcommittee will also be taking over the Geosynthetic standards in TS-4e including:

a. M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications,

b. R 50, Geosynthetic Reinforcement of the Aggregate Base Course of Flexible Pavement Structures, and

c. R 69, Determination of Long-Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement.

2. The Chair asked the COMP Secretary if this was accurate. Mark stated that it appears to be although the creation of a new TS has not been finalized. From the COMP Secretary: If the new TS is established any geosynthetic related standard under ballot in TS 4e will remain with TS 4e until the ballot is finalized and then the standard will be moved over to the new TS.

E. Proposed New Standards

1. No new standards are being proposed.

F. NCHRP Issues – The Chair was unaware of any issues. Danny Lane, the TS Research Liaison stated no

issues.

G. Correspondence, Calls, Meetings

1. None.

H. Proposed New Task Forces (Include list of volunteers to lead and/or join TF.) -None.

I. New TS Ballots

1. Potential TS Ballot for revised M 251 resulting from TF 19-1. There is some work to be done but possibly a TS ballot in the spring of 2021.

VII. Open Discussion – Nothing discussed.

VIII. Adjourn – Meeting was adjourned at 12:15 pm EST.


TS Meeting Summary

Meeting Summary

Items Approved by the TS for Ballot (Include reconfirmations.)

Standard Designation Summary of Changes Proposed Ballot Type

M 213 ASTM Equivalency from D1751-04(13) to D1751-18. ☐TS ☒COMP ☐CONCURRENT

M 288

See B. TS Ballots – M 288 – This will go COMP ballot if no further changes. Concurrent if technical changes are made. ☐TS ☒COMP ☒CONCURRENT

MP 25 Adopt as Full Standard with editorial revision ☐TS ☒COMP ☐CONCURRENT

M 33M/M 33 Section 6.1 tolerance revision. ☐TS ☐COMP ☒CONCURRENT

M 288 Reconfirmation due

M 297 Reconfirmation with editorial change

T 368 Reconfirmation due



MP 25 Reconfirmation due

MP 26 Reconfirmation due

PP 85 Reconfirmation due

TP 126 Reconfirmation due

New Task Forces Formed

Task Force Name Summary of Task TF Member Names and (States)

None

Research Proposals (Include number/title/states interested.)

None presented

Other Action Items


COMMITTEE ON MATERIALS AND PAVEMENTS

Meeting (Annual or Mid-Year) Annual – Virtual Meeting

Date Friday, July 31, 2020

Scheduled Time 11:00 AM – 12:00 PM EDT

Technical Subcommittee & Name 4e – Joints, Bearings, and Geosynthetics

Chair Name and (State) Timothy Ramirez (Pennsylvania)

Vice Chair Name and (State) Vacant

Research Liaison Name and (State) Danny Lane (Tennessee)

I. Introduction and Housekeeping

II. Call to Order and Opening Remarks

A. Brief Summary of Activities(Briefly explain the goals of today’s meeting and what you hope to accomplish. Get everyone up to speed and on

the same page.)

III. Roll Call of Voting Members

Present Member Name State Present Member Name State ☐ Robert G. Lauzon CT ☐ Clark S. Morrison NC

☐ Richard Douds GA ☐ Kenny R. Seward OK

☐ Daniel H. Tobias IL ☐ Timothy Ramirez PA

☐ Richard A. Barezinsky KS ☐ Danny L. Lane TN

☐ Jason Davis LA ☐ John Schuler VA

☐ Clement Fung MA ☐ Kurt Williams WA

☐ James A. Williams, III MS ☐ Anne Holt Ontario

☐ Brett S. Trautman MO ☐

☐ Ross (Oak) Metcalfe MT ☐

☐ F. Steven Heiser NY ☐

Quorum Rules Met?

Annual Meeting: Simple majority of voting members (☐y/ ☐n) | Mid-Year Meeting: Voting members present (☐y/ ☐n)

A. Review of Membership (New members, exiting members, etc.)

1. James Williams (MS) – Retired.

2. Michael Benson (AR), Vice Chair – Retired July 17, 2020.

a. Looking for volunteer to serve as Vice Chair.

3. Anne Holt (Ontario) replaced Becca Lane (Ontario)

4. Jonathan Curry (Industrial Fabrics Association International) – Now with ACEC Minnesota

5. Chair not aware of any other new voting members or exiting voting members.

6. If anyone wishes to be a member of TS 4e, please contact Casey Soneira ([email protected])

IV. Approval of Technical Subcommittee Minutes

TS 4e 2019 Mid-Year Webinar Meeting Minutes (December 12, 2019) – See 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda

Attachment A (8 Pages)

V. Old Business

Appendix A


mailto:[email protected]

A. COMP Ballot Items (Include any ASTM changes/equivalencies, including ASTM standards’ revision years.)

COMP Ballot # Standard


COMP 19-03 Item 23

M 33, Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for Concrete (Bituminous Type)

0/41 (10 No Vote)


All comments except one technical comment were addressed editorially and are included in the published M 33M/M 33-20. The one technical comment from Virginia regarding a Section 6.1 tolerance is included below as a proposed concurrent ballot item.

COMP 19-03 Item 24

M 153, Preformed Sponge Rubber, Cork, and Recycled Rubber Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction

0/41 (10 No Votes)


All comments were addressed editorially and are included in the published M 153-20.

COMP 19-03 Item 25

R 69, Determination of Long-Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement

0/41 (10 No Votes)


All comments were addressed editorially and included in the published R 69-20.





M 213, Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient Bituminous Types)

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS Ballot based on ASTM equivalency review to go from referencing ASTM D1751-04(2013) to referencing ASTM D1751-18. No comments received.

TS to consider for a COMP Ballot Item.


M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS ballot to remove definitions and requirements for “enhancement” and “Class 1A” geotextile; to add definitions for geogrid and geotextile; to add references to the AASHTO NTPEP Subgrade Stabilization Work Plan (SSGEO);

See last row below for this TS Ballot Item.

Appendix A





to add text for “soil” stabilization; to add new Section 12 and Table 12 for geotextile and geogrid requirements for subgrade stabilization (Class 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D) and to replace the previous “enhancement” requirements; to editorially revise Section X1.1.3.1 for better phrasing; and to editorially revise/update language in Section 10.1 and throughout Section X1.6 when referencing asphalt binders, cutback asphalts, emulsified asphalts, and asphalt mixture. Revisions proposed by Mr. Scott Hidden (NC), Chair AASHTO NTPEP TC on Geosynthetics (GTX, REGEO, and SSGEO). Proposed revisions were based on GMA consensus document. Comments received from GA, KS, LA, MO, PA, & VA.

Georgia: It is recommended that Section 10 - Paving Fabric be (re)moved. Also, please consider the removal of appendix X 1.6.1.1 through 1.6.3.15 for the following reasons: Based on our agency’s bad experience from multiple paving fabric projects, the method dealing with wrinkle has an installation issue in the field. More specifically, all curves section of paving fabric had wrinkle issues since fabric rolls are placed in straight line by a mechanical applicator while the roadway always has curves which caused a lot of wrinkles. The installer cut fabric many times manually during paving and tried to “iron out the wrinkles” without much success. In addition, all paving fabric were picked up by construction equipment and had to be removed later. Even the sections with smoothly installed fabric, the asphalt pavement shows cracks and delamination. Most of time, once the contractor began overlaying the fabric with asphalt, it was observed that the fabric was being picked by paving equipment’s tires, such as trucks, and materials transfer device (MTV). The fabric manufacturer’s field rep had the contractor throw asphalt on the fabric in front of the paving equipment tries to prevent pick up (the procedure as stated in the appendix X 1.6). But as we know, this is normally considered to be

TS to discuss. Chair recommends that Section 10 and Appendix X1.6 remain in M 288 due to use by other agencies and local/municipal governments.

Appendix A





improper paving practices because the asphalt compacted by the paving equipment tires in front of the pavers screed contributed to inconsistent compaction and bad ride (a smoothness issue). Further inspection of those paving fabric projects revealed cracks and tears in the finished mat. This was most likely caused by the fabric not adhering to the wrinkled surface of the fabric and blemishes left in the fabric by construction equipment. Because the paver had to sit for an extending amount of time while the fabric was being cut and removed manually, the asphalt mix in the hopper was allowed to cool prior to placement. This chilled asphalt caused surface blemished in the mat. In summary, the paving fabric DID MORE HARM THAN GOOD to asphalt pavement quality.

Kansas: 2.2 ASTM D4884 can be removed as it is no longer referenced in this specification

Agree. Removed ASTM D4884/D4884M from Section 2.2 as ASTM D4884/D4884M was referenced in Table 6 (now deleted).

Louisiana: As the current version includes Class 1 as the highest and Class 3 as the lowest strength, will including Class 4 for some of the strongest materials lead to confusion, or is it just an arbitrary number? I don't have any definite solution except to refer to the category as something other than "4". Perhaps Class S or Class ST. We've used the Class 1 - 3 for so long, I don't recommend renumbering the original classes.

TS to discuss. Chair recommends keeping as Class 4.

Missouri: Affirmative with one editorial comment: 1) On Page 16, Table 12, the description over the Classes (i.e. 4A, 4B, 4C & 4D) states the following: "Geosynthetic Classa, b and Types" It appears the lower case letters 'a' and 'b' need to be superscript.

Agree. Editorial change made.

Pennsylvania: 1) PennDOT will continue to follow PennDOT Publication 408, Section 735

No action required.

Appendix A





(Geotextiles) and Section 738 (Geogrids) for geosynthetics and not adopt M 288.

Virginia: I suggest voting yes. However, please address the following question: As for the wide tensile strength for geogrid, the draft section (12.3) has "Values for Geogrid Wide Width Tensile Strength are the sum of the values for the wide width tensile strengths in the machine and cross machine direction." Why is the sum value used in classifying the different classes of geogrid? Geotextile uses tensile strength in the weakest principal direction... Is there any reason that the sum value instead of the weakest value should be used for geogrid? Also, please see below a minor editorial change that we are proposing: 12.1 - change "coincident functions" to dual primary functions (to be consistent with the change made in 8.4.1

Section 12.3: The sum value came from the GMA Consensus Specification for Geogrid Subgrade Stabilization. Section 12.1: TS to consider this revision. Section 12.1 is not exactly the same as Section 8.4.1. Section 8.4.1 is for soil stabilization with geotextiles only, whereas, Section 12.1 is both geogrids and geotextiles, so the wording doesn't seem like it can be exactly the same.

M 288 overall TS to consider for COMP Ballot Item.


MP 25, Performance-Graded Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

0/14 (2 No Votes)

TS ballot proposing to adopt as a full standard (M XXX) with revisions to update reference to R 95 (formerly T 367). No comments received.

TS to consider for COMP Ballot Item.

C. Reconfirmation Ballots



TS 4e 19-01 Item 1

M 168, Wood Products

0/15 (3 No Votes)


TS 4e 19-01 Item 2

M 230, Expanded and Extruded Foam Board (Polystyrene)

0/15 (3 No Votes)


Appendix A


C. Reconfirmation Ballots



TS 4e 19-01 Item 3

M 251, Plain and Laminated Elastomeric Bridge Bearings

0/15 (3 No Votes)


TS 4e 19-01 Item 4

MP 26, Cotton Duck Fabric Bridge Bearings

0/15 (3 No Votes)

None Published as MP 26-15 (2020).

D. Task Force Reports

Task Force # Title Members Status/Update

TF 15-1 M 288 revisions to include geogrid for base reinforcement, address comments from ASTM D35 committee received from Jim Goddard, include geotextile for wrapping pipe, and other revisions.

Tim Ramirez, Chair (PA), Tom Burnett (NY), Chris Peoples and Scott Hidden (NC), Tony Allen (WA), Jonathan Curry (GMA), Daniel Selander (Thrace-LINK and Chair GMA Geotextile Focus Group), Mike Clements (Huesker, Inc.), Jim Goddard (Consultant), and AASHTO NTPEP Technical Committee on Geosynthetics (GTX & REGEO) Representatives: John Schuler (VA) and Rodrigo Herrara (FL).

The chair received redline revisions on M 288 from Scott Hidden (NC). These revisions included terminology section revisions, reference to the AASHTO NTPEP Audit Program for Subgrade Stabilization (SSGEO), Table 1 revisions to remove Class 1A geotextile, removal of “enhancement” requirements, and addition of new Section 12 for geotextile and geogrid requirements for subgrade stabilization. TS discussion recommended these revisions be balloted on a Technical Subcommittee ballot first before being COMP balloted. Chair issued COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS ballot (Ballot Start Date 6/29/2020 and Ballot Due Date 7/20/2020) which included M 288 with these revisions.

TF 19-1 M 251 alignment with AASHTO NTPEP Elastomeric Bridge Bearing (EBB) Technical Committee Workplan.

Lead: Katheryn Malusky (AASHTO) TS4e: Tim Ramirez (PA), Daniel Tobias (IL), Mike Stelzer (NY), Angela Beyke (VA), Ralph Dornsife (WA) NTPEP EBB: Joseph Stillwell (ME), Aaron Bonk (WI), Karl Janak (TX), Robert Anderson (Scougal Rubber), Brad Streeter (D.S. Brown), Robert Sarcinella (NTPEP). COBS T-2: Sara Manning (AL), Kevin Reichers (IL). COBS T-4: Bill Dreher (WI) - Retired.

TF held conference call on July 14, 2020 and discussed primary issues with current M 251. Dan Tobias (IL) agreed to prepare a draft revised “strawman” M 251. Dan Tobias provided draft revised “strawman” M 251 to the TF on July 23, 2020 for review. TF to schedule another meeting during 3rd or 4th week of August 2020.

VI. New Business

A. AASHTO re:source/CCRL/NTPEP (Observations from assessments, as applicable.)

Appendix A


B. Presentation by Industry/Academia

1. No presentations planned for 2020 Annual Meeting.

C. Revisions/Work on Standards for Coming Year


M 33M/M 33 Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for Concrete (Bituminous Type)

Revise Section 6.1 tolerance for thickness from “+1 mm to 0 mm [1/16 in. to 0 in.]” to “±1 mm [1/16 in.]” to match referenced equivalent ASTM D994/D994M-11(2016), Section 6.1 thickness tolerance. Concurrent ballot item. See 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda Attachment B (2 Pages).

PA

M 213 Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving and Structural Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient Bituminous Types)

ASTM Equivalency Review to go from ASTM D1751-04(2013) to ASTM D1751-18. Chair completed equivalency review and issued revisions on COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. COMP Ballot Item.

MO, PA

M 288 Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications

Due for Reconfirmation. Revisions issued on COMP-TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. COMP Ballot Item.

NY

M 297 Preformed Polychloroprene Elastomeric Joint Seals for Bridges

ASTM Equivalency Review to go from ASTM D3542-08(2013) to ASTM D3542-08(2019). Chair completed equivalency review and found only one minor editorial change in ASTM D3542-08(2019), Table 1, Footnote D. Chair touched base with AASHTO Publications on how to revise AASHTO Standard Designation Year. AASHTO Publications advised issuing on Reconfirmation Ballot including revision to reference ASTM D3542-08(2019).

PA

T 368 Measuring Low-Temperature Flexural Creep Stiffness of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR)


T 369 Evaluation of the Low-Temperature Tensile Property of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Direct Tension Test


T 371 Measuring Interfacial Fracture Energy of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant Using a Blister Test


MP 25 Performance-Graded Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

Reconfirmation due. Chair revised and issued on COMP TS4E-20-01 TS Ballot. Ballot includes revision to adopt as full standard and revise reference from T 367 to R 95. COMP Ballot Item.

PA, AR

MP 26 Cotton Duck Fabric Bridge Bearings

Reconfirmation due. AR

PP 85 Grading or Verifying the Sealant Grade (SG)


Appendix A



of a Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

TP 126 Evaluation of the Tracking Resistance of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)


D. Review of Stewardship List

See 2020 Annual Meeting Agenda Attachment C (2 Pages)

1. A new Technical Subcommittee will be formed within COMP to address Erosion Control Product standards and the new Technical Subcommittee will also be taking over the Geosynthetic standards in TS-4e including:

a. M 288, Geosynthetic Specification for Highway Applications,

b. R 50, Geosynthetic Reinforcement of the Aggregate Base Course of Flexible Pavement Structures, and

c. R 69, Determination of Long-Term Strength for Geosynthetic Reinforcement.

E. Proposed New Standards

1. No new standards are being proposed.

F. NCHRP Issues

G. Correspondence, Calls, Meetings

1. None.

H. Proposed New Task Forces (Include list of volunteers to lead and/or join TF.)

I. New TS Ballots

1. Potential TS Ballot for revised M 251 resulting from TF 19-1.

VII. Open Discussion

A.

B.

VIII. Adjourn

TS Meeting Summary

Meeting Summary

Items Approved by the TS for Ballot (Include reconfirmations.)

Standard Designation Summary of Changes Proposed Ballot Type

☐TS ☐COMP ☐CONCURRENT







Appendix A


Meeting Summary





New Task Forces Formed

Task Force Name Summary of Task TF Member Names and (States)

Research Proposals (Include number/title/states interested.)

Other Action Items

Appendix A


COMP Technical Subcommittee 4e – Joints, Bearings, and Geosynthetics

Webinar ID # Registered # Attended

224-189-507 138 103

Attended Interest Rating Last Name First Name Email Address Time in Session Organization Job Title

Yes 82 ANDERSON ROBERT [email protected] 1 hour 14 minutes Scougal Rubber Corporation President

Yes 43 Alcorn Charles [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes PennDOT Physical & Instrumentation Lab Manager

Yes 73 Allen Tony [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes WSDOT State Geotechnical Engineer

Yes 47 Alzamora Daniel [email protected] 1 hour 25 minutes

Yes 51 Andrews David [email protected] 1 hour 25 minutes Propex GeoSolutions Transportation Market Segment Manager

Yes 67 Antoniadis Nick [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes MassDOT QA Engineer

Yes 68 Barezinsky Rick [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes Kansas DOT Assistant Bureau Chief, Construction and Materials

Yes 41 Barker susan [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes Kansas DOT Structural Materials Engineer

Yes 70 Barot Sejal [email protected] 31 minutes MDOT/SHA/Office of Materials Technology Director

Yes 39 Baumgardner Gail [email protected] 1 hour 26 minutes InfoTech Senior Business Analyst

Yes 53 Beyke Angela [email protected] 1 hour 28 minutes VDOT Concrete Program Manager

Yes 77 Black Michael [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Transportation Engineer Branch Manager

Yes 58 Blair Joe [email protected] 1 hour 9 minutes NHDOT Chief of Materials Technology

Yes 41 Blakely John [email protected] 1 hour 35 minutes MDOT Product Evaluation

Yes 100 Bluman Matthew [email protected] 1 hour 31 minutes AASHTO NTPEP Associate Program Manager

Yes 85 Brawner Dorian [email protected] 1 hour 5 minutes Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Transportation Engineer

Yes 64 Brum Mark [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes Massachusetts Department of Transportation Materials Quality Systems Engineer

Yes 41 Cashatt Clay [email protected] 1 hour 24 minutes Hanes Geo Components National Technical Director

Yes 90 Chuck Fred [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes GMA Executive Director

Yes 56 Cole Neoma [email protected] 1 hour 3 minutes GA DOT Pavement Management Branch Supervisor

Yes 98 Dafoe Katharine [email protected] 1 hour 22 minutes Chemical Materials Supervisor

Yes 85 Davis Jason [email protected] 1 hour 24 minutes LA DOTD Materials Laboratory Field Quality Assurance Administrator

Yes 98 Doran Michael [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes Tennessee Department of Transportation Civil Engineering Manager 2

Yes 76 Doucet Felix [email protected] 1 hour 23 minutes Ministry of Transportation of Quebec Engineer

Yes 84 Eacker Mike [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes Michigan DOT Pavement Management Engineer

Yes 37 Elmes Jaclyn [email protected] 46 minutes Infotech, Inc. Business Analyst

Yes 43 Entrekin David [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes Future Labs, LLC owner

Yes 61 Euler Chris [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes NYS Dept. of Transp. Director, Central Testing Laboratories

Yes 99 Felag Mark [email protected] 1 hour 33 minutes AASHTO Contractor Secretary

Yes 48 Figueroa John [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes John Figueroa Consulting Director

Yes 58 Flournoy Monica [email protected] 1 hour 22 minutes Georgia Department of Transportation State Materials Engineer

Yes 88 Fung Clement [email protected] 1 hour 25 minutes MassDOT Research and Materials

Yes 89 Gaddam Madan [email protected] 1 hour 27 minutes MDOT SHA Assistant Division Chief, OMT-EGD

Yes 40 Gheibi Emad [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes SHA Assistant Division Chief

Yes 66 Glass Wesley [email protected] 1 hour 10 minutes Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Section Supv

Yes 97 Glick Vince [email protected] 1 hour 16 minutes AASHTO Business Systems Analyst, NTPEP

Yes 61 Golden Shannon [email protected] 1 hour 29 minutes Alabama Department of Transportation Forensic Investigations & Evaluations Engineer

Yes 43 Graves Clark [email protected] 1 hour 16 minutes Kentucky Transportation Center Associate Director

Yes 37 Hall Heather [email protected] 28 minutes

Yes 40 Hanna George [email protected] 1 hour 22 minutes WV DOT-Materials Division Metals Section Supervisor

Yes 90 Hatami Kianoosh [email protected] 34 minutes

Yes 52 Heiser Steven [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes New York State DOT Geotechnical Engineer

Yes 71 Hernandez Jaime [email protected] 1 hour 22 minutes Marquette University Assistant Professor

Yes 74 Hidden Scott [email protected] 1 hour 23 minutes NCDOT

Yes 46 Holt Anne [email protected] 1 hour 15 minutes Ministry of Transportation Ontario Head, Laboratory Services

Yes 40 Hosseini Arash [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes Terracon Geotechnical and Pavement Engineer

Yes 55 Howard Timothy [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes MDSHA Assitant Division Chief

Yes 94 Ingram Steven [email protected] 40 minutes ALDOT Deputy State Materials and Tests Engineer

Yes 97 Johnson Daryl [email protected] 1 hour 8 minutes Okla DOT Materials Div Structural Materials Engneer

Yes 43 Kegley Alan [email protected] 1 hour 29 minutes MDOT (MS) Assistant State Materials Engineer - Field Operations

Yes 67 Kim Wansoo [email protected] 1 hour 23 minutes VDOT Materials Program Manager

Yes 74 Knipe Benjamin [email protected] 1 hour 5 minutes Marland Department of Transportation Soils Laboratory Engineer

Attendee Report:

Attendee Details

Report Generated:

08/04/2020 09:07 AM EDT

Actual Start Date/Time

07/31/2020 10:46 AM EDT

Duration

1 hour 35 minutes

Appendix B



Attendee Details

Yes 98 Kuniega David [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes PennDOT Chief Chemist

Yes 57 Lamanilao Roberto [email protected] 1 hour 35 minutes

Yes 95 Lane Danny [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes Tennessee DOT Materials and Tests manager

Yes 97 Lauzon Bob [email protected] 1 hour 16 minutes ConnDOT Principal Engineer (Materials)

Yes 98 Lawrence Bill [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes

Yes 35 Lenker Steven [email protected] 26 minutes AASHTO re:source CMRL Director

Yes 82 Lostumbo John [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes

Yes 98 Lukkarila Paul [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes Caltrans Senior Bridge Engineer- Structural Materials Testing

Yes 80 Malusky Katheryn [email protected] 1 hour 24 minutes

Yes 39 Mann Michelle [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes New Mexico Department of Transportation Geotechnical Engineering & Exploration Section Manager

Yes 96 Martini Megi [email protected] 58 minutes

Yes 55 Meininger Richard [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes FHWA-TFHRC-HRDI-10 Research Civil Engineer (Highway)

Yes 50 Metcalfe Oak [email protected] 42 minutes Montana DOT State Materials Engineer

Yes 86 Miller Beverly [email protected] 1 hour 8 minutes PennDOT

Yes 45 Morris Barbara [email protected] 1 hour 17 minutes

Yes 76 Morrison Clark [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes NCDOT State Pavement Design Engineer

Yes 95 Osborne Erin [email protected] 44 minutes Delaware Department of Transportation Materials Engineer

Yes 58 PAN CHARLIE [email protected] 1 hour 31 minutes NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CHIEF MATERIALS ENGINEER

Yes 82 Paye Barry [email protected] 1 hour 1 minute Wisconsin DOT Chief Pavement & Material Engineer

Yes 97 Preston Chris [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes WVDOH Highway Engineer - Environmental & Coatings Group

Yes 100 Ramirez Timothy [email protected] 1 hour 35 minutes PA Department of Transportation Engineer of Tests

Yes 90 Rojas Ben [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes Oklahoma Department of Transportation Geologist

Yes 82 Ross Adam [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes KYTC Acting TEBM Pavement Design

Yes 52 Rothblatt Evan [email protected] 1 hour 15 minutes ASTM International

Yes 93 Saha Sunil [email protected] 1 hour 23 minutes KY Transportation Cabinet Transportation Specialist

Yes 38 Sandoval-Gil Jesús [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes Arizona Department of Transportation State Materials Engineer

Yes 44 Santee Thomas [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes NCDOT Eastern Regional Operations Engineer

Yes 80 Sarcinella Robert [email protected] 1 hour 30 minutes AASHTO (NTPEP) Contractor Owner

Yes 90 Schuler John [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes VDOT Asst State Materials Engineer

Yes 89 Selander Daniel [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes Willacoochee Industrial Fabrics, Inc. Sales & Technical Support

Yes 39 Semple-Perriea Carlos [email protected] 1 hour 25 minutes Department of Highways - MCS&T Chemist 111

Yes 98 Seward Kenny [email protected] 1 hour 25 minutes Oklahoma Transportation Assistant Materials Engineer

Yes 96 Smith Buan [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes KyTC New Product Engineer

Yes 55 Speakmon Tyler [email protected] 39 minutes Cemex Sr Infrastructure Engineer

Yes 42 Stilwell Joe [email protected] 1 hour 16 minutes MaineDOT Fabrication Engineer

Yes 76 Streeter Brad [email protected] 1 hour 20 minutes Scougal Rubber Corporation Quality Manager

Yes 82 Su C. K. [email protected] 44 minutes North Carolina Department of Transportation GeoMaterials Workgroup Supervisor

Yes 42 Tamrakar Prajwol [email protected] 1 hour 15 minutes Tensar ATM-PO

Yes 58 Thielke Russell [email protected] 1 hour 18 minutes NYSDOT Chief of Pavement Management Systems

Yes 97 Tobias Daniel [email protected] 1 hour 16 minutes Illinois Department of Transportation Engineer of Concrete, Soils and Metals

Yes 92 Trask Dan [email protected] 37 minutes Solmax

Yes 99 Trautman Brett [email protected] 1 hour 22 minutes Missouri DOT Physical Laboratory Director

Yes 71 Turgeon Curt [email protected] 1 hour 10 minutes

Yes 39 Uljua Camaree [email protected] 38 minutes Montana Department of Transportion Engineering Project Manager

Yes 42 Updike Joseph [email protected] 50 minutes Forterra Technical Resource Engineer

Yes 68 Weinland Scott [email protected] 1 hour 19 minutes AZ Department of Transportation Pavement Design Engineer

Yes 38 Welter Jim [email protected] 28 minutes Ohio Department of TransportationAdministrator Office of Materials Management, State Testing and

Materials Engineer

Yes 47 Whittington Todd [email protected] 1 hour 21 minutes North Carolina Department of Transportation State Materials Engineer

Yes 53 Young Ryan [email protected] 1 hour 32 minutes WVDOH Transportation Engineering Technician, Senior

Yes 93 Zamora Rogelio [email protected] 1 hour 2 minutes Kansas Department of Transportation Physical Tests Engineering Associate

Yes 90 Zwanka Merrill [email protected] 1 minute SCDOT Materials and Research Engineer

No 0 Arndorfer Robert [email protected] -- Wisconsin DOT Geotechnical Engineering Supervisor

No 0 Becker Peter [email protected] -- INDOT Research Engineer

No 0 Beeson Matt [email protected] -- Indiana Department of Transportation Director, Materials Management

No 0 Bergum Kenneth [email protected] -- Florida Department of Transportation Field Operations Specialist

No 0 Brayack Dan [email protected] -- WVDOH Control Engineer

No 0 Buckley John [email protected] -- Tensar International Limited Business Manager - Aust/NZ

Appendix B



Attendee Details

No 0 Chestnut Brian [email protected] -- BTB Consulting Executive Consultant

No 0 Clark Taylor [email protected] -- MaineDOT Assistant Fabrication Engineer

No 0 De Vries Jeff [email protected] --

No 0 Donahue John [email protected] -- Missouri DOT Construction and Materials Liaison Engineer

No 0 Fragapane Ryan [email protected] -- AASHTO Associate Program Manager, AASHTOWare

No 0 Hollandsworth Brad [email protected] --

No 0 Irick Jera [email protected] -- UDOT Bridge Inspection Manager

No 0 Johnston William [email protected] --

No 0 Kerstetter Joseph [email protected] -- TDOT Assitant Lab Manager

No 0 Kolodziej Schaina [email protected] -- CREATE's Lab Tech

No 0 Linneman Matt [email protected] -- NDDOT State Materials & Research Engineer

No 0 Merseal Gina [email protected] -- Infotech, Inc. Senior Project Manager

No 0 Miner Misty [email protected] -- WAQTC Vice Chair

No 0 Moghrabi Yasmine Al [email protected] --

No 0 Nassar Wajahat [email protected] --

No 0 Romero Matt [email protected] -- Oklahoma Department of Transportation Materials Division Engineer.

No 0 Schrann Kruz [email protected] -- PennDOT Civil Engineer

No 0 Schumaker Clayton [email protected] -- NDDOT Engineer

No 0 Semple-Perriea Carlos [email protected] --

No 0 Sickels Jon [email protected] -- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc.

No 0 Sizemore Edward [email protected] -- WVDOH Highway Engineer

No 0 Soneira Casey [email protected] -- AASHTO

No 0 Sprague Joel [email protected] -- TRI Environmental Technical Director

No 0 Stanevich Ronald [email protected] -- West Virginia Division of Highways Director Of Material Control Soils and Testing Division

No 0 Stelzer Mike [email protected] -- NYSDOT PE2

No 0 Stephens Michael [email protected] -- NCDOT Engineer

No 0 Upshaw Patrick [email protected] -- FDOT - SMO State Structural Materials Engineer

No 0 Warren Amanda [email protected] -- ODOT State Pavement Design Engineer

No 0 Wu Shenghua [email protected] --

Appendix B


TS 4e AASHTO

Standard

(Published 2020)

1st

Published

Date of

Provisional

Reconfirm

Required

Referenced

ASTM

Standard

Current

ASTM

Standard

Standard TitleAssigned

To:

M 33M/M 33-20 2023 D994/D994M-

11(2016)

Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for

Concrete (Bituminous Type)

MT

M 153-20 2023 D1752-18 Preformed Sponge Rubber and Cork

Expansion Joint Fillers for Concrete Paving

and Structural Construction

AR

M 168-07 (2020) 2023 Wood Products MT

M 213-01 (2019) 2022 D1751-04 (2013) D1751-18 Preformed Expansion Joint Fillers for

Concrete Paving and Structural

Construction (Nonextruding and Resilient

Bituminous Types)

MO

M 230-07 (2020) 2023 Expanded and Extruded Foam Board

(Polystyrene)

NY

M 251-06 (2020) 2023 Plain and Laminated Elastomeric Bridge

Bearings

NY

M 288-17 2020 Geotextile Specification for Highway

Applications

NY

M 297-10 (2019) 2022 D3542-08 (2013) ASTM D3542-

08(2019)

Preformed Polychloroprene Elastomeric

Joint Seals for Bridges

PA

R 50-09 (2018) 2021 Geosynthetic Reinforcement of

the Aggregate Base Course of Flexible

Pavement Structures

NY

R 69-20 2023 Determination of Long-Term Strength for

Geosynthetic Reinforcement

WA

R 95-19

(formerly T 367)

2022 Accelerated Aging of Hot-Poured Asphalt

Crack Sealant Using a Vacuum Oven

PA/AR

T 42-10 (2015)

Discontinued

D545-08 D545-14 Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for

Concrete Construction

PA

T 366-18 2021 Apparent Viscosity of Hot-Poured Asphalt

Crack Sealant Using Rotational Viscometer

PA/AR

T 368-17 2020 Measuring Low-Temperature Flexural

Creep Stiffness of Hot-Poured Asphalt

Crack Sealant by Bending Beam Rheometer

(BBR)

PA/AR

T 369-17 2020 Evaluation of the Low-Temperature Tensile

Property of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack

Sealant by Direct Tension Test

PA/AR

T 370-18 2021 Measuring Adhesion of Hot-Poured Asphalt

Crack Sealant Using Direct Adhesion Tester

PA/AR

T 371-17 2020 Measuring Interfacial Fracture Energy of

Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant Using a

Blister Test

PA/AR

MP 25-18 (2019) 2015 2020 Performance-Graded Hot-Poured Asphalt

Crack Sealant

PA/AR

COMP TS-4e Status of Standards (2020)

Appendix C


TS 4e AASHTO

Standard

(Published 2020)

1st

Published

Date of

Provisional

Reconfirm

Required

Referenced

ASTM

Standard

Current

ASTM

Standard

Standard TitleAssigned

To:

COMP TS-4e Status of Standards (2020)

MP 26-15 (2020) 2015 2020 Cotton Duck Fabric Bridge Bearings AR

PP 85-18 (2019) 2017 2020 Grading or Verifying the Sealant Grade (SG)

of Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant

PA/AR

TP 126-18 (2019) 2017 2020 Evaluation of the Tracking Resistance of

Hot-Poured Asphalt Crack Sealant by

Dynamic Shear Rheometer (DSR)

PA/AR

Appendix C


Date post:	04-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

COMMITTEE ON MATERIALS AND PAVEMENTS MINUTES ......equipment tires in front of the pavers screed...

Documents