+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training...

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training...

Date post: 29-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: phamnhan
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
8
1 C ommon Operating Environment, Interoperability, and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)
Transcript
Page 1: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

1

Common Operating Environment, Interoperability,

and Command Post Modernization (LOEs 2, 3, and 4)

Page 2: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

CSA’s Principles, Characteristics

and Requirements

Principles (Why)Warfighting

RequirementsCharacteristics of the

NetworkTechnical Network

Requirements

Mission: The Army must fight

and win wars against

adversaries…

1st Principles: The Army

network must enable:

1. Conduct of War: Execution

of expeditionary, world-wide,

Unified Land Operations

(ULO) to shape, prevent, and

win as a part of UnifiedAction

in all domains and all

environments (Note 1/2/3/4)

2. Preparation for War:

Execution of Title 10

responsibilities to man, train,

and equip the force, and to

build and sustain readiness.

Able to fight, shoot,

move, communicate,

protect, and sustain

Reliably communicate

anywhere, anytime, in

all domains, in all

environments, against

any foe

Simple and Intuitive, single

mission command suite

(Single COP), installed,

operated and maintained by

Soldiers

Available, Reliable and

Resilient with the ability to

operate in all operational

environments against any

enemy

Expeditionary and Mobile,

voice, data, and video on the

move

Standards-based, protected,

and dynamic network that is

upgradeable over time

Enables the Warfighter to

Observe, orient, decide, and

act faster than the enemy in

the conduct of ULO (Note

4)

Enables use of the network

as a weapon system

Enables leaders to lead and

fight their formations from

anywhere they choose

Must be capable of adequate

secure communications, provides

voice, data, video in all

environments

Capable of providing situational

awareness down to Platoon level

Device works anywhere in the

world; installed, operated and

maintained by Soldiers

Standardized: Runs on a COE,

common graphics, applications,

and integrated data

Ensures continuous Joint

interoperability enabling agile and

adaptable operational flexibility

i.e., Enables Rapid Task

Organization and employment

of joint capabilities

Mitigates electronic signature

Accessible to allies and coalition

partners

Note 4: ULO – Simultaneous offense, defense, and stability or defense support of civil authorities tasks to seize,

retain, and exploit the initiative and consolidate gains to prevent conflict, shape the operational environment and

win our nations wars as part of unified action

Note 1: Unified Actions Partners –

Consisting of Joint, Interagency,

Intergovernmental, and Multi-

National (JIIM) partners

Note 2: Domains – Land, maritime,

air, space, cyber

Note 3: Environments – Permissive,

non- permissive, contested, denied

Page 3: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

Etc…

TAIS

GCCS-A

AMPS

AMDWS

• Different User Interfaces

• Different Maps

• Different Training

• Different Hardware

DCGS-A

AFATDS

JBC-P

CMD WEB

TIGR

Mission Command Systems

CPOF

Current

• Common User Interface

• Single Shareable Geospatial

Foundation

• Transferable Training

• Common Hardware

Future

WfF Apps

Page 4: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

CPCE will provide an intuitive user experience for Movement and Maneuver Applications while setting conditions

for additional Warfighting Functions to converge from stovepipped systems to integrated applications.

INDUSTRY MODEL

In your pocket

On the road

In the office/home

INDUSTRY MODEL APPLIED TO ARMY

Dismounted

Mounted

Command Post

Applications owned developing companies but reside on computing devices

Applications developed by original PEOs, but reside on CPCE/MCE

From disparate SW & HW platform s To common SW onto common HW devices

Common Operating Environment

(COE)

Page 5: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

5

Hosts COE ApplicationsExpeditionary

AgileScalable

Integrated DesignsReduced Footprint

MobileEnergy Efficient

Formation AppropriateSurvivable

Future CP Characteristics

Current Program of Record

Unit Initiatives

Command Post Improvements

CPI2 Objective

Page 6: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

UNCLASSIFIED

The Multiple Layers to

Interoperability Challenges

IntegratedCompatible Deconflicted

Large Scale Combat Operations (LSCO)Crisis Response/Limited ContingencyMil. Engagement/Security Coop./Deterrence

Theater Army Division BattalionBrigadeCorps

Mission Command IntelligenceMovement & Maneuver Fires ProtectionSustainment

Joint

USAF

USMC

USN

SOF

Allies/Parnters/Others

ABCANZ

ROK

NATO

Others

Inter-Org

USG IA

MN GOV

HN GOV

NGOs

Network enabled

full interoperability

Effective interaction and

complimentary processes

Aligned capabilities and

procedures, no interaction

Priorities? Non-negotiable Areas? Forcing Functions?

At Echelons?

Across the Range of Military Operations (ROMO)

Interoperability across the various Warfighting Functions?

ABCANZ

goal is an

integrated

2-star HQ

for LSCO

NLT 2020

Top Secret

Secret

SEC//REL

Secure UNCLASS

Unclassified

At what level is the

information protected?

Types of Partners?

Levels of Interoperability

2

Page 7: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

UNCLASSIFIED7

Path Forward

WFX 18.4 JWA 18.1 USAREUR

Saber

StrikeAll things

Pacific

JWA 19.1Army, Joint,

Combined

Exercises

MPE Digital COP

MPE Core Services

Digital Fires

ISR/Intel Fusion

Secure Tactical Voice

Key Sustainment

Capabilities

Cross Functional Teams

IntegratedCompatible Deconflicted

Determining Levels of Interoperability (Prioritized 1-N List)

MC Interoperability White

Paper

Interoperability Proponency

Governance/Framework

Full DOTMLPF-P Analysis

CONUS MPE

Digital Fires

Secure Tactical Voice

Key Sustainment Capabilities

CTC Rotations

Informs longer term efforts

Objectives

Decision Drivers

Key Interoperability Opportunity Events (Campaign of Learning)

ISR/Intelligence Fusion

All things

Pacific

Page 8: Common Operating Environment, Interoperability, and ... LOE 2-4... · •Different Training •Different Hardware DCGS-A AFATDS JBC-P CMD WEB TIGR Mission Command Systems CPOF Current

Start with Software Development Kits (SDK), they describe:

• CPCE/MCE architecture and components for infrastructure, core utilities and MC

applications. Data strategy and the ways to extend it.

• The strategy to achieve common look and feel with specific examples.

• How 3rd party developers can work convergence including Data Architecture, User

Interface, Geospatial and HW perspective.

• Command Post solutions in support of CSA principles, characteristics, and requirements.

• Interoperability solutions that increase Unified Partner access to Mission Command

Systems.

How Industry Can Participate


Recommended