+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin...

Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin...

Date post: 12-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: scott-clark
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
36
Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell
Transcript
Page 1: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children

The Oral vs. Manual debate

By: Kaylin Carswell

Page 2: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Manual education- Teaches children to communicate using sign language.

Oral education- Teaching the deaf or hard-of-hearing to rely on speech reading, body language/expressions, gestures and their residual hearing for receptive language. Individuals using this method learn to speak to express themselves.

Page 3: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

History of Sign Langauge & Oralism Ponce De Leon

Abb de L’Epe “father of sign language”Sign language “natural language of the

deaf”

Samuel Heinicke “father of oralism”

Page 4: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

History of Sign Language in America1817

Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet & Laurent Clerc

First school for the deaf in Hartford in 1817

Page 5: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

History of Sign Language in AmericaFor the next 63 years sign language was the

primary method used to educate the deaf

1864 National Deaf Mute College Gallaudet University

-DPN Movement (1988)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKnF9CCYQPQ

Page 6: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Conference of Milan 1880

Sign Education vs Oral Education

Page 7: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

End to the trend….Oral method is superior

Within 10 years only ¼ of teachers educating the deaf were deaf themselves

Within the next 20 years only 1/5 of total teachers educating the deaf were deaf

Sign forbidden

Page 8: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Oralism in America1867New York Institution for the Improved Instruction of Deaf-Mutes

-Lexington School for the Deaf

Northampton, MassachusettsClarke Institution for Deaf-Mutes

-Clarke School for the Deaf/Center for Oral Education

Page 9: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.
Page 10: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Oralism1872School started in Boston by Alexander Graham Bell

1890American Assoc. to Promote the Teaching of Speech to

the Deaf, Inc.-Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf

Page 11: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

1960sCivil rights movement American Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975

Sign Language Structure by William Stokoe

Proclaimed American Sign Langauge was: -real langauge

-unique from English -own grammar and syntax

Babbidge Report “oral education was a “dismal failure””

Page 12: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Oralism Sign Language*Academics *Human rights*Assimilation *Social emotional benefits

*Deaf Culture

Page 13: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Oralism and EducationQualified teachers

ADA & IDEA

New Technology

Higher education

Page 14: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Common goals among oral programsEarly detection of hearing loss

Amplification & intervention

Parent involvement in child’s education

The use of residual hearing

Emphasizing speech without sign language for communication

Page 16: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Oralism and AssimilationAvoidance of rejection, segregation, and pain

Included and accepted by the hearing population

Ease of communication

Page 17: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Sign Language and social-emotional benefitsAccepting who they are

Whole

Complete not “broken”

Strong sense of identity

Deaf culture

Page 18: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Sign Language and exercising human rightsFree to practice the natural law to preserve

their nature

ADA and IDEA laws

Users don’t have to jeopardize their self-respect or fear discrimination

Page 20: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Medical Model of DeafnessVs.

Cultural Model of Deafness

Page 21: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Medical Model Cultural ModelFunctional disorder that

needs to be fixed

Handicapped

Called deaf

Use of Oral methods

Linguistic minority with distinct language & culture

Difference

Considered deaf

Use of ASL

Page 22: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Total CommunicationBlending several methods together to educate the

deaf

Can include:-fingerspelling-sign language-speech-speech reading-writing -facial expressions-hearing devices

Page 23: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

“NO One has one right way to raise a deaf child, any more than anyone has one right way to raise a hearing child.  The politics involved in deaf education are nauseating and who suffers the most in the end are the children themselves.” ~Sherri Kowertz

Page 24: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

????????????????????

Questions

Page 25: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

1. Oral education includes all but which of the following?

a. speech reading b. sign languagec. residual hearingd. speech

b. sign language

Page 26: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

2. Who is known as “the father of sign language?”

a. Ponce De leonb. Samuel heinickec. Abb de L’Eped. Laurent Clerc

c. Abb de L’epe

Page 27: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

3. When was sign language brought to America?

a. 1825b. 1817c. 1901d. 2010

b. 1817

Page 28: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

4. Who brought sign language to America?

a. Samuel Heinicke b. Dr. Elangovanc. Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet &

Laurent Clercd. Alexander Graham Bell

c. Thomas Hopkins Gallaudet & Laurent Clerc

Page 29: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

5. Users of ASL typically______

a. Accept they are handicapb. Look at themselves as

needing to be fixedc. Accept themselves for who

they are, not what others want them to be

d. Have low self-esteem

c. Accept themselves for who they are, not what others want them to be

Page 30: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

6. The Milan Conference of 1880 decided _____________

a. To abolish deaf educationb. Sign language should be the

primary method of educationc. Deaf individuals had the right to

choose what method of education they wanted

d. The oral method was superior to the manual method of deaf educationd. The oral method was superior to

the manual method of deaf education

Page 31: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

7. ASL started to emerge as an accepted method of education in the 1960s due to which of the following?

a. The Milan Conferenceb. The Civil Rights Movementc. William Stokoe’s Sign

Language Structure d. Both b and c

d. Both b and c

Page 32: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

8. Those who support sign language highly value______

a. Academics b. Social-emotional benefitsc. Integration into socieyd. New Technology

b. Social-emotional benefits

Page 33: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

9. The cultural model views deafness as ____________

a. A functional disorder that needs to be fixed

b. A linguistic minority with a distinct language

c. A handicapd. Both b & c

b. A linguistic minority with a distinct language

Page 34: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

10. Total communication involves_____

a. Speech readingb. Sign languagec. Hearing devicesd. All of the above

d. All of the above

Page 35: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

Through deaf eyes video

GREAT JOB

Page 36: Communication methodologies for hard-of-hearing children The Oral vs. Manual debate By: Kaylin Carswell.

ReferencesHunt, N. & Marshall, K. Exceptional Children and

Youth. (2006). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Baker, K. “Oral Communication versus American

Sign Language.” Accessed on 20 April 2010.http://www.drury.edu/multinl/story.cfm?

ID=9901&NLID=166http://www.articlesnatch.com/Article/The-Condense

d-History-Of-Sign-Language/403854http://www.listen-up.org/edu/options1.htmhttp://my.gallaudet.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/Dea

f%2520Eyes%2520Exhibit/Language-06oralschool.htm

http://www.pbs.org/weta/throughdeafeyes-http://www.aslinfo.com/gallaudet.cfm


Recommended