+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Community Views on Intellectual Property as a Barrier to Access UNITAID Meeting – 4th OCT Sarah...

Community Views on Intellectual Property as a Barrier to Access UNITAID Meeting – 4th OCT Sarah...

Date post: 25-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: garey-norman
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
16
Community Views on Intellectual Property as a Barrier to Access UNITAID Meeting – 4th OCT Sarah Zaidi, International Treatment Preparedness Coalition
Transcript

Community Views on Intellectual Property as a Barrier to Access

UNITAID Meeting – 4th OCT

Sarah Zaidi,International Treatment Preparedness

Coalition

WHO is ITPC?

International – a worldwide organisation, primarily centred on the global South. Treatment – dedicated to enabling effective, affordable health care for all people living with HIV, with a focus on key affected populations.Preparedness – supporting HIV treatment and health literacy for individual and community decision-making, including building and sustaining comprehensive treatment-focused advocacy capacityCoalition – a network of people living with HIV, treatment activists and their supporters.

Intellectual Property Rights

Legal systems adopt utilitarian tools such as IPR, of IP designed to encourage innovation on one hand and balance that with needs for diffusion and access Patents, Copyright, Trademark, are examplesTrade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS 1995) is the most comprehensive of all the international IPR regimes in terms of scope and membership- all countries compliant by 2005 and less developed by 2016Pharmaceuticals argue that innovation and development requires a strong IP regime

What is TRIPS?Sets minimum standards for

intellectual property protection: patents, copyright, trademarks, etc.

For most developing countries these standards are higher than the previous standards.

Obliges all members to provide 20 year patents on pharmaceutical products.

TRIPS makes no differentiation between life-saving and life-style medicines.

TRIPS allows for certain flexibilities and safeguards (Doha Declaration).

What REALLY is TRIPS? Multinationals, research-based

pharmaceuticals, key architects of TRIPSMedicines are treated like any other

commercial commodityCommercial interests protected over public healthTrade rights trump human rights

TRIPS+Free Trade Agreement: bypass TRIPS, impose new restrictions, and come by many names (partnerships, agreements etc. )Regional or bilateral agreements between Developed Countries (US/UK/Japan etc) or Regions (European Union) and a middle-income / low income country –

Data exclusivity (monopolies on off-patent medicines)Focus on issue of clinical trials – originator companies want generic producers to submit their own data to prove safety and efficacy, obliging them to repeat clinical trials for commercial reasons from using data

Delay in launch of generic / diminished likelihood of speedy competition, marketing and price reductions

DE is five plus years

Limitations on compulsory licensesNo parallel importation & seizing goods in transit and other stronger enforcement mechanismsPatents may last for longer (20+5 years - ‘patent term extensions’ or ever greening)

Experience of FTA on Countries

Jordan (US – 2001) Medicine prices have increased by 20% and in some cases by 600%One hospital alone has increased its medicine spending 6-fold, Over 25% of the Ministry of Health’s budget is now spent on buying medicines, Data exclusivity has delayed the introduction of cheaper generic versions of 79% of medicines Higher medicine prices are threatening the financial sustainability of government public health programs.

Guatemala – (CAFTA – US)840,000% increase in prices

77 brand-name drugs have data protection for either 5 or 15 years, including 5 protease inhibitors for HIV/AIDS

Data Exclusivity 15 years for Kaletra

African countries currently in FTA negotiations: 2011

Click to edit Master text stylesSecond level

Third level Fourth level

Fifth level

Current Threat – European Union-India FTASPIN

European Commission claims: Policy will not weaken India’s ability to produce and export affordable meds.FACT3 aspects of agreement that will have chilling affect on the Indian generic companiesData Exclusivity – delay in registration of generic medicine (up to 10-years)

Stopping the flow of generic medicines through border measures (20 incidents of legitimate generic medicines transiting through European ports being detained, including second-line HIV meds for Africa)

Killing of generic competition through stricter enforcement of IP (i.e. mandatory use of court orders when patent or trademark dispute emerges between generic and patent-holding company then generic manufacture would have to stop production even before case is heard in court)

Community ResponseEducateOrganizeMobilizeEngage

Delhi, India (2nd March 2011), PLHIV groups mobilized a protest of 2000+ persons to express their views to the MOH and Prime Minister

In Busan, Korea (regional HIV conference) a second march

Effect of Generic Competition

Source: MSF, Untangling the Web 2010

The Story of ARV Scale-Up

Next Scale-up?Benefits of treatment on prevention, TB, maternal mortality child mortality6 million on ARVs need is 18 million and growingCosts are a concern given the current financial situationNeed for optimal better, more-forgiving treatment regimens, 2nd line, pediatricNeed to foster healthy generic production around the world (not only India)Need to address issues of quality of ARVs

Prices and Access

Together we need to find strategies and policies that result in lower prices for essential life saving pharmaceuticals in all countries.

Human rights must trump trade rights.

We must determine what is acceptable rent (profit) on essential life-saving drugs.

Civil Society Interventions

Pushing back against restrictive IP laws and policies that harm communities. Interventions include:Advocacy e.g. campaigning, media outreach, advocacy with decision-makers;

Building capacity;

Strengthening local, national, regional and global partnerships

Lobbying around proposed and actual legislative proposals, filing patent oppositions, advocating for proper implementation of laws impacting access, advocating for compulsory licensing

Potential Roles for UNITAID to support the community-based

movement for treatment access

Support treatment literacy initiatives at the community levelIssue institutional supportive letters for positions adopted by communities on major IP-promoting initiatives, including the TPPA and Free Trade AgreementsCreate systematic processes to increase meaningful participation in UNITAID’s activities from a wide range of civil society stakeholders, including People Living with HIV and advocates from across the Global South


Recommended