Community Work Programme

 

15 November 2011

Portfolio Committee on Cooperative GovernanceAnd

Traditional Affairs

2

A. Introduction

The Community Work Programme (CWP) was initiated by the Second Economy Strategy Project an initiative of the Presidency.

In 2007, a pilot programme to test the approach was implemented under the auspices of a partnership between the Presidency and the Department for Social Development, who constituted a Steering Committee and provided oversight.

As a result of initial performance during the pilot phase, the CWP was accepted in 2008 as a new element within the second phase of the

Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP), and provisionally located within its new ‘non-state’ sector.

3

A. Introduction…

In 2009, as further lessons from the pilot emerged, it became clear that the CWP could achieve significant scale, and

could also contribute to a number of key strategic goals of government. In the State of Nation Address on the 3 June 2009, President Zuma committed government to ‘fast- track’ the CWP.

To go to scale, it was necessary to establish the CWP as a fully-fledged government programme, with access to full programme funding. Accordingly, the decision was taken to locate CWP within the Department of Co-operative Governance (DCoG) from 1 April 2010.

4

B. What is the Community Work Programme?

1. The CWP aims to provide an employment safety net, by providing a minimum level of regular work opportunities to participants, with a predictable number of days of work provided per month.

2. This supplements the existing livelihood strategies of participants and provides a basic level of income security through work.

3. It is targeted at unemployed and/or underemployed people of working age, including those whose livelihood activities are insufficient to lift them out of poverty.

5

B. What is the Community Work Programme?....

1. The Community Work Programme provides access to a minimum level of regular work - 2 days a week = 100 days a year at a wage rate of R60.00 per day.

2. It is an area-based programme, intended to be ongoing; this allows it to target the poorest areas: where market-based jobs are unlikely to come any time soon.

3. The CWP uses community participation to identify ‘useful work’ and priorities.

4. ‘Work’ is decided in Ward Committees or local development fora; it is multi-sectoral and contributes to public/community goods and services;

5. Start-up scale: 1,000 participants per site6. CWP sites have a 65% labour intensity.

6

C. The Community Work Programme and Government Outcomes

1. Implementation of the Community Work Programme is Output 3: Outcome 9: "A Responsive, Accountable, Effective and Efficient Local Government System“;

2. The CWP is also one of the Local Government Turn Around Strategy (LGTAS) priorities;

3. The programme also contributes to the following Outcomes:  Outcome 4: “Decent Employment through Inclusive Growth”. The CWP

contributes directly to Jobs Driver 4: Investing in social capital and public services of the New Growth Path (NGP). The NGP explicitly commits

government to “extend the Community Work Programme to more wards”.  

Outcome 7: “Vibrant, Equitable and Sustainable Rural Communities and Food Security for All”, particularly Output 4: Improved employment

opportunities and promotion of economic livelihoods

7

C. The Community Work Programme and Government Outcomes

4. The Community Work Programme is a key priority for short-term employment creation as per resolutions of the Cabinet Lekgotla of 26–28 July 2011. The Cabinet Lekgotla adopted the scaling up of the Community Work Programme to a million work opportunities by 2013/2014.

5. The realisation is that the economy and South Africans need a stronger short-term employment boost while new investment projects take root.

6. The advantage of the CWP is that it has proven its ability to expand rapidly and flexibility while strengthening of the community structures provides a platform for other programmes.

7. The programme also creates an institutional mechanism that facilitates integrated development at the local level.

8

D. CoGTA and the Community Work Programme CoGTA provides the most appropriate institutional home for CWP :

Local Government is a critical success factor for the CWP. The programme will have a positive contribution to the objectives of Local Economic Development and Public Participation and Empowerment. The CWP has the potential to strengthen the interface between local government and communities. CWP helps deepen community participation in local development planning-a key part of the agenda of strengthening a developmental state.

9

The EPWP is a nationwide programme covering all spheres of government and state-owned enterprises.

It aims to draw significant numbers of unemployed, unskilled people into productive work, so that they increase their capacity to earn an income.

While the EPWP provides an important avenue for labour absorption and income transfers to poor households in the short to medium-term, it was not designed as a policy instrument to address the structural nature of the unemployment crisis

The CWP is a programme within the Non State sector of the of the Expanded Public Works Programme (EPWP) that was introduced in the 2nd Phase of the Programme

E. CWP AND Expanded Public Works Programme

EPWP and CWP

Expanded Public Works Programme

Community Work Programme

1. Various ratios of labour intensity

65:35

2. Sector/Project based work opportunities

Work decided by communities

3. Number of days depended on sector

Offers 100 days of work spread throughout the year (Regular part-time work)

4. Scale of participation (Minimum number of participants) varies

1000 participants per site

5. Managed by contractors/NGOs

Local Management Structures

Community Work Programme

Progress to date (2011/2012)April-September 2011

12

Performance Indicators: Annual Targets

Indicator

Annual performance  

Projections  

2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/2014  

Total number of work opportunities to be

created as per Outcome 9 Delivery

Agreement

87 000 108 000 171 000 237 000  

Cumulative work opportunities created 89 689 83 791 * 171 000 237 000  

* 01 April 2011-31 September 2011

For the period April to September 2011 the programme offered work opportunities to 83 791 participants. The work opportunities were created in all 9 provinces, across 63 municipalities and covering 480 wards

13

Performance Indicators: Annual TargetsThe actual participation rate in September is 69, 807 and the cumulative participation for April to September is 83, 791. For the last financial year April 2010 to March 2011 89, 689 participants were part of CWP.

14

SUMMARY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PER PROVINCE (2) CWP Targets and Performance per Province ALL Gauteng Eastern Cape

Western Cape

Northern Cape North West Free State

KwaZulu-Natal Limpopo Mpumalanga

Number of CWP sites to be implemented 74 12 19 3 4 6 7 11 6 6 Number of CWP sites implemented 74 12 19 3 4 6 7 11 6 6 % performance 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Number of participants targeted 69 120 14 000 19 320 2 300 2 600 4 100 7 500 9 400 4 500 5 400 Number of participants worked 83 791 20 658 21 060 3 554 3 350 6 075 8 248 10 440 4 828 5 578 % performance 121% 148% 109% 155% 129% 148% 110% 111% 107% 103%Number of person days of work 6 900 941 1 397 760 1 928 909 229 632 259 584 409 344 748 800 938 496 449 280 539 136 Number of person days of work created 3 119 012 691 072 898 556 99 659 96 927 187 053 329 180 396 498 196 352 223 715 % performance 45% 49% 47% 43% 37% 46% 44% 42% 44% 41%Number of 100 day opportunities 69 009 13 978 19 289 2 296 2 596 4 093 7 488 9 385 4 493 5 391 Number of 100 day opportunities created 31 190 6 911 8 986 997 969 1 871 3 292 3 965 1 964 2 237 % performance 45% 49% 47% 43% 37% 46% 44% 42% 44% 41%

Number of full time equivalent jobs (230 days) 30 004 6 077 8 387 998 1 129 1 780 3 256 4 080 1 953 2 344 Number of FTEs created (230 days) 13 561 3 005 3 907 433 421 813 1 431 1 724 854 973 % performance 45% 49% 47% 43% 37% 46% 44% 42% 44% 41%

15

SUMMARY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PER PROVINCE (2)

16

17

Community Work Programme

Upscaling of the Community Work Programme

19

•CWP’s track record so far demonstrates that it can scale up far faster than its current targets suggest;

•With waiting lists of over 1000 participants in most of its existing sites, the programme could double the projected numbers per site with little difficulty;

•There is significant demands for new sites;

•There are a range of opportunities to scale up particular areas of work already tested in CWP especially in the following areas:

— Schools support: Placing matriclulants at public schools— Food security: Food gardens (households, school, ECD)— Environmental work: land rehabilitation, erosion control, greening

activities— Home-based care

CWP as an Opportunity to Fast-track Job Creation

Community Work Programme

Expansion Plan

The strategy to reach one million participants by 2013/14 is based on the following three linked elements: 1. Extension of CWP’s geographical coverage to additional wards within

municipalities.

2. Intensification of existing work activities, in ways that improve the quality and effectiveness of the work performed: Community Based Care, food security, basic services, Clean Cities and Towns.

3. Expanding areas of innovation tested in CWP, to contribute additional work opportunities in relation to specific forms of work such as the schools support programme; watershed services in priority River Catchment areas.

By expanding to an average of 4 275 participants per municipality, a target of 1 million is achievable within the timeframe, using the existing CWP model; with some intensification of work activities.

1. The Strategy to reach 1 million participants by 2013/2014

2. Extension of CWP Geographical Coverage Rollout and Site selection

• The target is to ensure a CWP presence in every municipality by 2012/13.

• Each of the current sites will also expand to cover all poor wards per municipality by 2013/2014. At present, the CWP covers an average of five to 10 wards per municipality.

• There is convergence of information on the identification of the most deprived wards in South Africa.

• The greater majority of most deprived wards are in areas serviced by distressed local municipalities

• The most populous provinces of KZN, EC, LP and MP happen to have the largest number of poor wards between them.

Considerations for selection of initial roll-out Municipalitiesand wards will be based on the following:

• Provincial Indices of Multiple Deprivation (PIMD)-Area-based measures of deprivation. 5 domains of deprivation: Income and material deprivationEmployment deprivationHealth deprivationEducation deprivationLiving environment deprivation.

• Alignment with other National and Provincial Interventions and Programmes: War on Poverty Programme, Presidential Nodal Areas-ISRDP, LGTAS Assessments (vulnerable municipalities), CRDP

3. CWP Rollout and Site Selection

Community Work Programme

Implementation Model

Implementation Model

Each IA will have a range of LIA’s

Community Work Programme

Job Creation Targets and

Financial Requirements

28

1. Scaling up from 2012/13

2012/13 2013/14 2014/15

New inception municipalities 171 -

-

Number of current municipalities 63 - -

Number of municipalities at full capacity 63 234

234

Total municipalities at year end 234 234 234

CURRENT MTEF (‘000) 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15

CWP per current MTEF 849 400 896 100 949 860

CWP additional resources required 3 194 872 8 432 887 11 226 895

CWP budget now required 4 044 272 9 328 987 12 176 755

TARGET PARTICIPANTS 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15

Outcome 9 Delivery Agreement (Participants at year end)

87 000 108 000 171 000 237 000 237 000

2012- MTEF: No of participants at year end (1 Million)

89 689 83 791 658 350 1 000 350 1 000 350

29

Thank You!