Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | sybil-terry |
View: | 225 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Comparative genomics, ChIP-chip and transfections to find
cis-regulatory modules
Penn State University, Center for Comparative Genomics and Bioinformatics: Webb Miller, Francesca Chiaromonte, Ross Hardison
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia: Mitch Weiss, Lou Dore
NimbleGen: Roland Green, Xinmin ZhangCold Spring Harbor, March 2007
What is conservation good for??
Ideal cases for interpretation by comparative genomics
Neutral DNASimilarity
Human vs mouse
Position along chromosome
DNA segments with a function common to divergent species.
DNA segments in which change is beneficial to at least one of the two species.
Negative selection(purifying)
P (not neutral)Neutral DNA
Similarity
Positive selection(adaptive)
Neutral DNA
Human vs rhesus
Putative transcriptional regulatory regions = pTRRs
• Antibodies vs 10 sequence-specific factors: – Sp1, Sp3, E2F1, E2F4, cMyc, STAT1, cJun, CEBPe, PU1, RA Receptor A
– High resolution ChIP-chip platforms: Affymetrix and NimbleGen
– Data from several different labs in ENCODE consortium
• High likelihood hits for ChIP-chip– 5% false discovery rate
• Supported by chromatin modification data– Modified histones in chromatin: H4Ac, H3Ac, H3K4me, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, etc.
– DNase hypersensitive sites (DHSs) or nucleosome depleted sites
• Result: set of 1369 pTRRs
Functional classes show distinctive trends in phylogenetic depth of
conservation
Genes likely regulated by clade-specific pTRRs are enriched for
distinctive functions
310
450
91
173
Millions ofyears
Percentage of pTRRs that align no further than:Primates: 3%
Eutherians: 71%
Marsupials: 21%
Tetrapods: 4%
Vertebrates: 1%
David King
Enriched GO categories
q-value for FDR
Immune response
Protease inhibition
Mitosis and cell cycleTranscriptional regulation
0.0006
0.0005
0.0005
0.004
0.012Ion transport
Regulatory potential (RP) captures pattern, composition and constraint
in alignments
Genome Research 16:1585 (2006)
• High RP for an aligned sequence means it contains patterns similar to those found in gene regulatory regions– Positive training set: Alignments of known regulatory regions – Negative training set: Alignments of likely neutral DNA
(ancestral repeats)• Human and mouse RP scores are on UCSC Genome Browser and
PSU’s Galaxy
High RP plus conserved consensus motif is a good predictor of CRMs around
GATA-1 regulated genes
Genome Research 16:1480 (2006)
Genes Co-expressed in Late Erythroid Maturation
G1E cells: proerythroblast line lacking the transcription factor GATA-1. G1E-ER cells: rescued by expressing an estrogen-responsive form of GATA-1Rylski et al., Mol Cell Biol. 2003
Predict CRMs based on alignment and expression of
nearby genes• Gene is up- or down-regulated by GATA-1• Noncoding DNA sequence • Aligns between mouse and other mammals and has a positive RP score
• Contains a conserved consensus binding site motif for GATA-1
preCRMs with conserved consensus GATA-1 BS tend to be active on transfected
plasmids
DNA segments with positive RP and a GATA-1 binding motif validate as enhancers at a
good rate
RP consensus motif Tested Validated SuccessPositive conserved 44 23 52%Positive mouse 6 4 67%Negative conserved 6 1 17%Negative none 17 0 0%
Design of ChIP-chip for occupancy by GATA-1
1. Non-overlapping tiling array with 50bp probe and 100bp resolution (NimbleGen)
2. Cover range Mouse chr7:57225996-123812258 (~70Mbp)3. Antibody against the ER portion of
GATA-1-ER protein in rescued G1E-ER4 cells
50 50
100
Yong Cheng (PSU), with Mitch Weiss & Lou Dore (CHoP), Roland Green, Xinmin Zhang(NimbleGen)
Signals in known occupied sites in Hbb LCR
1) Cluster of high signals2) “hill” shape of the signals
HS1 HS2 HS3
ChIP-chip hits are high quality and tend to have GATA-
1 binding motifs• Peak calling by Mpeak (Ren) and Tamalpais
(Beida and Farnham) gave 321 ChIP-chip hits
• 19 hits were tested by qPCR– 13 were validated: ~70%
• 267 out of the 321 (83%) have WGATAR motifs, binding site for GATA-1– Random sampling on average gives 102 DNA
segments with the motif– The ChIP-chip hits are 2.6-fold enriched
for the GATA-1 binding site motif
Only HALF the GATA-1 binding site motifs are conserved
outside rodents• Of the GATA-1 binding motifs in those 249 hits, 112 (45%) are conserved between mouse and at least one non-rodent species.
Distribution of ChIP-chip hits on 70Mb of mouse chr7
Yong Cheng, Yuepin Zhou and Christine Dorman
0
1
2
3
4
GHP181GHP10GHP205GHP7GHP182GHP309
GHP1GHP186GHP204
GHP4GHP314GHP172GHP167GHP74GHP193GHP25GHP27GHP9
GHP170GHP18GHP16GHP243GHP15GHP28GHP17GHP31GHP11GHP198GHP169GHP14GHP173GHP29GHP199GHP12GHP3GHP2GHP24GHP164GHP13GHP30GHP19GHP26GHP161GHP191GHP197GHP183GHP184GHP22GHP6GHP23GHP206GHP194GHP202GHP0GHP200
GHP8GHP185GHP118GHP20 GHN037GHN534GHN006GHN133GHN322GHN478GHN159
YC3
GHN240GHN391GHN419GHN213
Mean fold change
GATA-1 occupied sites by ChIP-chip No GATA-1
21 out of 59 ChIP-chip hits increase activity of HBGpr-Luc in K562 cells.
36% of ChIP-chip hits act as enhancers in K562 cells
14.55.7
0
1
2
3
4
5
GHP7GHP172GHP198GHP10GHP25GHP14GHP15GHP181GHP13GHP186GHP170
GHP1GHP182GHP16GHP169GHP184GHP18GHP9
GHP164GHP24GHP173GHP4
GHP197GHP193GHP167GHP30GHP183GHP185GHP23GHP26GHP2GHP29GHP199GHP28GHP161GHP31GHP191GHP194GHP3GHP12GHP200GHP206
GHP0GHP11GHP27GHP22GHP8GHP118GHP21GHP20 GHN534GHN037GHN391GHN159GHN478GHN240GHN006GHN419GHN133GHN322GHN213
Mean fold change
GATA-1 occupied sites by ChIP-chip No GATA-1
15 out of 50 ChIP-chip hits increase activity of HBGpr-Luc in MEL cells.
30% of ChIP-chip hits act as enhancers in MEL cells
Validated ChIP hit, enhancer, deep conservation
Validated ChIP hit, enhancer, limited conservation
ChIP-chip hit, enhancer, rodent specific
0
1
2
3
4
K562_1 K562_2 MEL
Fold change over parent
Test of neutrality using polymorphism and divergence data
A promoter distal to the beta-like globin genes has a signal for recent
purifying selection
The distal promoter is close to the locus control region for beta-globin
genes
Evolutionary approaches to predicting and analyzing regulatory
regions• Sequence comparison alone will not detect all regulatory
regions– Need comprehensive protein-binding data
• Comparative genomics can help interpret the binding data– Aspects of regulation of some functional groups are clade-
specific– Depth of conservation may correlate with certain types of
function• Strong constraint on basal mechanisms?• Lineage-specific “fine tuning”?
• A majority of sites occupied by GATA-1 in G1E-ER cells have some function other than enhancement (by our assays)
• Incorporation of pattern and composition information along with with conservation can lead to effective discrimination of functional classes (regulatory potential).
Many thanks …
B:Yong Cheng, Ross, Yuepin Zhou, David KingF:Ying Zhang, Joel Martin, Christine Dorman, Hao Wang
PSU Database crew: Belinda Giardine, Cathy Riemer, Yi Zhang, Anton Nekrutenko
Alignments, chains, nets, browsers, ideas, …Webb Miller, Jim Kent, David Haussler
RP scores and other bioinformatic input:Francesca Chiaromonte, James Taylor, Shan Yang, Diana Kolbe, Laura Elnitski
Funding from NIDDK, NHGRI, Huck Institutes of Life Sciences at PSU
Categories of Tested DNA Segments
Regulatory potential (RP) to distinguish functional classes
Examples of validated preCRMs
ChIP-chip hits for GATA-1 occupancy
Mpeak TAMALPAIS
275 hits in both 276 hits in both216 6059
321 total ChIP-chip hits
Technical replicates of ChIP-chip with antibody against GATA1-ER
19 ChIP-chip hits were tested by qPCR:13 were validated: ~70%