+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comparing the Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple ...

Comparing the Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple ...

Date post: 29-Mar-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 3 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Shenakht Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry Vol. 3/ No. 2/ Summer 2016 Page: 56-81 Comparing the Effects of Cognitive- Behavioral Couple Therapy & Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Marital Happiness of Dissatisfied Couples Shirin azimifar 1* , Maryam fatehizadeh 2 , Fateme bahrami 3 , Ahmad ahmadi 4 , Ahmad abedi 5 1- PhD student, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan, Iran (corresponding author) 2- Associate professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan, Iran 3- Professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan, Iran 4- Professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan, Iran 5- Associate professor, department of children with special needs, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan, Iran Abstract Introduction: Marital happiness is one of the most important factors of marital relationship quality. It shows the degree of couples´ happiness regarding different aspects of their relation. It could be said that, more marital happiness indicates less marital conflicts and dissatisfaction. Regarding ongoing increasing of marital conflicts and divorce, using effective interventions is necessary for improving the quality of marital relationship. Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on marital happiness of the couples who are not satisfied with their relationship. Method: The method of this research was single-subject design. The study was carried out based on multiple baselines with an initiation of treatment. Sampling procedure of the study was convenience. Considering inclusion criteria, six couples were randomly assigned in two experimental groups. Independent variables were cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy that were presented in six sessions. The research instrument was Marital Happiness Questionnaire. Results: Based on significant differences between the intervention and baseline situations, the results showed that cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy have increased marital happiness. Also the results of the Repeated Measures Anova showed that there are no significant differences between the effects of these two therapies on increasing of marital happiness. Conclusion: cosidering these results, couple therapists can use the effective interventions of theses two therapeutic methods to increase marital happiness of couples especially those who have experienced some kind of dissatisfaction in their relations. Keywords: Cognitiv - Behavioral Couple Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, Marital happines [ Downloaded from shenakht.muk.ac.ir on 2022-03-29 ] 1 / 26
Transcript
Comparing the Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Marital happiness of dissatisfied couples in isfahan: A Single Subject ResearchPage: 56-81
Dissatisfied Couples
Shirin azimifar1*, Maryam fatehizadeh2, Fateme bahrami3, Ahmad ahmadi4, Ahmad abedi5
1- PhD student, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan,
Iran (corresponding author)
2- Associate professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of
Isfahan, Iran
3- Professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan,
Iran
4- Professor, department of counseling, faculty of psychology and education sciences, University of Isfahan,
Iran
5- Associate professor, department of children with special needs, faculty of psychology and education sciences,
University of Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Marital happiness is one of the most important factors of marital relationship
quality. It shows the degree of couples´ happiness regarding different aspects of their relation.
It could be said that, more marital happiness indicates less marital conflicts and
dissatisfaction. Regarding ongoing increasing of marital conflicts and divorce, using effective
interventions is necessary for improving the quality of marital relationship.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cognitive-behavioral
couple therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy on marital happiness of the couples
who are not satisfied with their relationship.
Method: The method of this research was single-subject design. The study was carried out
based on multiple baselines with an initiation of treatment. Sampling procedure of the study
was convenience. Considering inclusion criteria, six couples were randomly assigned in two
experimental groups. Independent variables were cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and
acceptance and commitment therapy that were presented in six sessions. The research
instrument was Marital Happiness Questionnaire.
Results: Based on significant differences between the intervention and baseline situations,
the results showed that cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and acceptance and commitment
therapy have increased marital happiness. Also the results of the Repeated Measures Anova
showed that there are no significant differences between the effects of these two therapies on
increasing of marital happiness.
Conclusion: cosidering these results, couple therapists can use the effective interventions of
theses two therapeutic methods to increase marital happiness of couples especially those who
have experienced some kind of dissatisfaction in their relations.
Keywords: Cognitiv - Behavioral Couple Therapy, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy,
Marital happines
1395 2
56-81 :


5 4 3 2 *1
) ( -1
[email protected]
-2
-3
-4
-5

:
. .

.
– :
.
. :
.
. . 6
:
. –
.
:
.
– :
[ D
– 58
56-81 1395 2


(. 1979 1 )




)
(.1390
( 2003) 5 4 3 2



.


( 2000 ) .



.


(.1386 ,)


1- Lewis & spainer

- .





(.82000 7 6)


( 1387 ).


( 1393 ) .
-
.
-


.
- ( 1393)

.

.
6- Hawton 7- Salkovskis
59
56-81 1395 2

.


.


2 1)
(.2009 4 3



.
5 )
2008).


.


.




.


1- Peterson
2- Eifert

)
(.1393


.
(2009 )

.


( 2005 ).

. 95

.

.

.

.

.

.



.

)
[ D
– 60
56-81 1395 2
3 2 1(. 2005
( 2004)


.
.
.




.


.



.




.
.



.
-2
.
- -3

.

.

6 .
.

.


.



.

.
.
-

.

[ D
61
56-81 1395 2

(.12010 )


.
) (


.

.



(.1392)
:
1392-1393
.
.

6
.
45 20

.
1- Gast

)
...(
.
42
.
2
.

.







.
( 5( ) )
-24-20-19-2. ( 1)
. 44
( 1387 )

.



.

.
[ D
– 62
56-81 1395 2

( 8/0)
( . -78/0)
.

. 8/0
75/0
(.1389) 7/0





.




.

.

.
.


120
.



. )
( .

3 2 1
(PND)4
( . POD)5

. 1-6
CBCT


)
. (
:
( 1


( 2


.


.
( 1-6 ) 6
1 -Visual analysis
5 -Percentage of Overlapping Data
[ D
63
56-81 1395 2
6
( B )
6

.
- :1

.


%100 PND)
(.
( PND )
-

.
: 2

.

.

.
"" -2 " " :1
[ D
– 64
56-81 1395 2
" ": 1

B A B A
6 3

84/143 34/127


140
129
124
125
34/127
POD 0%

" " -4 "" :3
[ D
65
56-81 1395 2
" ": 2

B A B A
6 3

34/144 34/127


142
129
128
131
34/131
POD 0%

"" -6 " " :5
[ D
– 66
56-81 1395 2
" ": 3

B A B A
6 3

5/154 5/145


150
5/147
142
145
5/145
POD 0%

"" -8 " " -7
[ D
67
56-81 1395 2
" ": 4

B A B A
6 3

160 5/147


156
151
144
146
5/147
POD 0%
"" - 10 " " :9
[ D
– 68
56-81 1395 2
" ": 5

B A B A
6 3

158 66/144


152
148
142
145
66/144
POD 0%

"" -12 " " :11
[ D
69
56-81 1395 2
" ": 6

B A B A
6 6

16/165 150


160
155
146
150
151
POD 0%

ACT

)
. (
( 1 :


( 2



.

.

( 7-12 ) 6
6
( B )
6

.
. 7-12
[ D
– 70
56-81 1395 2


.

%100 PND)
(.
( PND )
ACT

.

.

.

.
"" -14 " " :13

71
56-81 1395 2
"": 7

6 3

34/142 129


138
131
125
128
129
POD 0%
" " -16 "" :15
[ D
– 72
56-81 1395 2
" ": 8

B A B A
6 3

67/142 33/127


150
129
128
128
33/127
POD 0%

"" -18 " " :17
[ D
73
56-81 1395 2
" ": 9

B A B A
6 3

67/147 5/134


142
135
134
135
135
POD 0%

"" -20 " " :19
[ D
– 74
56-81 1395 2
" ": 10

B A B A
6 3

153 5/141


150
143
140
141
5/141
POD 0%

"" -22 " " :21

75
56-81 1395 2
" " : 11

B A B A
6 3

5/144 16/128


138
130
128
128
16/128
POD 0%

"" -24 " " :23

– 76
56-81 1395 2
" " : 12

B A B A
6 6

5/139 5/127


134
130
127
5/126
16/127
POD 0%

13

( P>0/05 )
.
: 13
f

103/0 213/3 152/61 1 152/61 ×
032/19 10 321/190
683/74 10 831/746
77
56-81 1395 2


.
( 1384 )
( 1389( )1387)
( . 1393 )
-





.
-



-.
( )

.


.



.



.


.






.
( 1384 )
-
( 1389) .



-

.
- ( 1393)

.


( 2000 1 )

1 Bradbury
– 78
56-81 1395 2
-
.


.


.

( 1395)
.



( 1393).

.
( 1392)

.









ACT .


.




.


.
.







.

.


.


.


.


[ D
79
56-81 1395 2

.














.



.

.


.


.




.


.
( 2008)



.




. –


.

.


.


.
[ D
– 80
56-81 1395 2



.



.

Studying the effects of acceptance and
commitment therapy on couples´ distress.
Biannual journal of applied counseling,
4(1), 103-119.
Effects of Cognitive-Behavioral Couple
Therapy on Marital happiness and marital
satisfaction: A Single Subject Research.
Master of Arts thesis. Faculty of
psychology and education sciences,
F., Ahmadi, A., & Abedi, A. (2016).
Studying the Effects of Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy on Marital
Beheshti University.
natune and determinats of marital
satisfaction: A decade in veview. Journal
of marriage and family, 66, 862-879.
Burpee, L.C., & langer, E.J. (2005).
Mindfulness and marital satisfaction.
267.
& Baucom, D.H. (2004). Mind fullness-
based relationship enhancement.
Aghamohammadi, S. (2013). Practical
Tehran, Psychology & art publication.
Research Methodology in Behavioral
Shambhala publication.
(2000). Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for
Psychiatric Problems: A Practical Guide.
Oxford medical publication.
A Begnning Conversation on the
Comparison of Acceptance and
Commitment Therapy and Traditiional
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. American
psychological Association. Published by
Baghban, I., & shojaheidari, M. (2011).
Studying the effects of Relationship
Enhancement training on couples´
129-149.
& Sartain, D.H. (2003). Wives
of religious couples. Journal of marriage
and the family, 23(4), 431-441.
Lewis, R.A. & Spanier, G.B.
stability of marriage. In W.R. Hill, F.I. Nye
& I.L. Reiss (Eds) Contemporary theories
about the family. Research- based
theories. New York, the free press, 208-
294.
effects of self- regulation based couple
therapy on couples´ optimism and
happiness. Master of Arts dissertation.
Faculty of psychology and education
sciences, University of Isfahan.
effects of cognitive- behavioral training on
marital satisfaction of couples in Tehran
University. Journal of counseling research
and developments, 4(14), 25-40.
81
56-81 1395 2
Peterson, B. D., Eifert, G. H., Feingold,
T., & Davidson, S. (2009). Using
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to
Treat Distressed Couples: A Case Study
with Two Couples. Cognitive and
Behavioral Practices, 16, 430-442.
A. (2014). Syudying the effects of group
cognitive- behavioral couple therapy on
marital burn out. Journal of family
counseling and psychotherapy, 4(2), 247-
267.
couple therapy on marital satisfaction and
depression of veterans. Journal of
educational psychology, 2(2), 47-63.
of congnitive- behavioral family therapy
on marital satisfaction of couples in
Shahrood. Doctoral dissertation, Allame
the direct and multiple relations among
attatchment styles, personality factors &
Gachsaran city. Master of Arts thesis.
Faculty of psychology and education
sciences, university of Isfahan.
effects of spiritual couple therapy on
family climate and marital happiness.
Master of Arts thesis. Faculty of
psychology and education sciences,

Recommended