+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: reagen-lodeweijke-mokodompit
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 22

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    1/22

    ComparisonComparisonAct No.3/1971 &Act No.3/1971 &

    Act No.31/1999 jo. ActAct No.31/1999 jo. Act

    No.20/2001 regardingNo.20/2001 regardingCorruption EradicationCorruption Eradication

    By: Flora Dianti, SH, MH.By: Flora Dianti, SH, MH.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    2/22

    OBJECTIVES:OBJECTIVES:

    The Distinctions betweenThe Distinctions between1.1. Act No.3/1971Act No.3/19712.2. Act No. 31/1999 jo. 20/2001Act No. 31/1999 jo. 20/2001

    Review and DiscussionReview and Discussion

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    3/22

    the Brief History of Antithe Brief History of Anti

    Corruption LawCorruption LawDistinguished into:Distinguished into:

    Before Old DecadeBefore Old Decade

    Old Decade: SoekarnoOld Decade: Soekarno

    New Decade: Soeharto Act.New Decade: Soeharto Act.No.3/1971No.3/1971

    Reformation Decade: Act No.Reformation Decade: Act No.31/1999 jo. Act No.20/200131/1999 jo. Act No.20/2001

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    4/22

    New Decade: SoehartoNew Decade: Soeharto

    Year Regulations Agencies

    1967 Press Decree to Fight CorruptionThrough Prevention andRepression

    CorruptionEradication Team(General Attorney)

    1970 Press Decree to AssessCorruption matters and itssolution(BUMN, Pertamina, Bulog, illegalLogging).

    Commission of Four(M. Hatta)

    1971 Corruption Eradication Act No.3Year 1971(No Transparency, Only Lowerlevel Official offender, Military

    Domination)

    Coordination:Investigator andProsecutors +Special Commission

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    5/22

    Anti Corruption Measures:Anti Corruption Measures:

    19981998--nownowYear Regulations Content

    1999 Clean Government LawNo.28/99

    Mandatory wealth declarationfor public officials

    Periodic Audits

    Commission to audit theWealth of State Officials

    1999

    2001

    Law on the Eradication ofCriminal Acts of CorruptionNo.31/1999

    Amendment (Law20/2001)

    Outlines charges andprocedures for prosecution

    Broadens and clarifiesdefinition of corruption andincreases penalties

    Defines criminal Corruption

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    6/22

    ComparisonComparison

    1. Formulation of Causalitet doctrine1. Formulation of Causalitet doctrine

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    Art. 1 (1) sub a & b: Direct andindirect causeWhich directly and indirectlycreates

    Art. 2 & 3: Direct Causewhich creates losses to thestate finance or state economy

    Direct and Indirect cause: Von

    Buri theory: Conditio sine quanon.

    Father-kid-taxi driver?Police-heart attack-people

    Direct Cause: adequaat causa.

    Von Kries Theory.

    Father-kid-taxi driver=?

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    7/22

    2. Formulation of formal & Material2. Formulation of formal & Material

    sensesense

    Act No. 3/1971Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    Art. 1 (1) sub a & b: illegally =formal sense.

    See Constitutional CourtDecision No. No.003/PUU-IV/2006>< Art. 28D (1) RI Constitution.

    Illegally should be= formalsense!

    Art. 2 & 3: illegally=formal and/ormaterial sense

    the word illegally covers acts that are

    against the law in theformal and material sense, namelyalthough the actions are not governedinlaw, in the event that the actions areconsidered as being punishable because

    they are not in line with the sense ofjustice or social life norms, the actionscan be sentenced.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    8/22

    3. Formulation of formal & Material3. Formulation of formal & Material

    offenceoffence

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    Art. 1 (1) sub a & b: material

    offence

    No word can=materialoffence

    Art. 2 & 3: Formal Offence

    In this provision, the word canbefore the phrasecreating losses to state finance orstate economy indicates that thecorruptact is a formal offence, namely thecorrupt acts existence is adequatelymetwith rules that have beenformulated without consequence

    Easier to be proven

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    9/22

    4. Formulation of intention &4. Formulation of intention &

    NegligenceNegligence

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    Art. 1 (1) sub a & b: should be

    known as illegal.

    Art. 2 & 3: Eliminate Should be

    known

    Meaning= with deliberateintention

    Meaning= with/withoutdeliberate intent=negligence

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    10/22

    5. Punishment5. Punishment

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    Most articles:

    Capital punishment of-Life imprisonment or-maximum imprisonment-& or maximum fine of Rp.30Million

    Most articles:

    Capital Punishment of: Light imprisonment Life imprisonmentMinimum & Maximumimprisonment

    & or max fine of Rp. 1 Billion

    See:Art. 2: 4 years + 200 MArt. 3: 1 year + 50 MArt. 5-12: AND/OR?Art. 12 A?

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    11/22

    6. Extent of Civil Servants definition6. Extent of Civil Servants definition

    Art. 1 (2) jo. Art. 92 PCArt. 1 (2) jo. Art. 92 PC2. Civil servants include:2. Civil servants include:

    a. civil servants as referred to in Law on Manpowera. civil servants as referred to in Law on Manpower

    b. civil servants as referred to in the Criminal Codeb. civil servants as referred to in the Criminal Code

    c. people receiving salaries or wages from the statec. people receiving salaries or wages from the statefinance or regional finance;finance or regional finance;

    d. people receiving salaries from a corporation thatd. people receiving salaries from a corporation thatreceives assistance from state finance or regionalreceives assistance from state finance or regional

    finance, orfinance, ore. people receiving salaries or wages from othere. people receiving salaries or wages from other

    corporations which use capital or facilities fromcorporations which use capital or facilities fromthe state or from the public.the state or from the public.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    12/22

    Civil Servants DefinitionCivil Servants Definition

    1. Art. 2(1) ActNo. 43/19991. Art. 2(1) ActNo. 43/1999

    2. Art. 92 Penal Code2. Art. 92 Penal Code

    3. Art. 1(2) ActNo. 31/19993. Art. 1(2) ActNo. 31/1999

    Act. No.43/1999 Civil Servants:Act. No.43/1999 Civil Servants:

    1. PNS (District & Central)1. PNS (District & Central)2. TNI2. TNI

    3. POLRI3. POLRI

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    13/22

    Corporation as a SubjectCorporation as a Subject

    Art. 1 (1)Art. 1 (1)

    Corporation constitutes an organizedCorporation constitutes an organized

    collection of people and/or wealth. It cancollection of people and/or wealth. It canbe in the form legal bodies and non legalbe in the form legal bodies and non legalbodiesbodies

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    14/22

    7. Additional Punishment7. Additional Punishment

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No AdditionalPunishment.

    Why?Bill of Penal Code:No light imprisonment

    Article 18 (1), (2) (3) :1. In addition to the additional sentence asreferred to in the Criminal Code,

    the additional sentences are:a. confiscation of mobile goods or immobilegoodsb. the compensation paid shall be to amaximum of twice the wealthobtained from the criminal act of corruption.

    c. whole or partial closing of the company formaximum period of 1 (one) year.d. revocation wholly or partially of rights orabolishment wholly.. which have been or canbe given by the government to the accused.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    15/22

    7. Additional Punishment7. Additional Punishment

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No AdditionalPunishment.

    Why?Bill of Penal Code:No light imprisonment

    Article 18 (1), (2) (3) :2. In the event that the accused does not pay thecompensation as referred

    to in paragraph (1) letter b in maximum period of1 (one) month after theverdict of the court has obtained legal permanentpower, the wealth can beconfiscated by the prosecutor and auctioned tocover compensation.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    16/22

    7. Additional Punishment7. Additional Punishment

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No Additional Punishment.

    Why?Bill of Penal Code:No light imprisonment

    Article 18 (1), (2) (3) :

    3. In the event that the accused does nothave adequate wealth to pay thecompensation as referred to in paragraph (1)letter b, the accused ismerely sentenced to a period that does notexceed the maximum sentencethe main crime, in accordance with theprovision in this law, with the periodof the sentence having been determined inthe court verdict.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    17/22

    8. Coordination of Investigation8. Coordination of Investigation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No Coordination ofinvestigation.

    Article 39:

    The Attorney General coordinatesand controls the indictment,interrogationand prosecution of the corruptact, which are conducted jointly

    with otherpersons, who abide by the PublicJustice and Military Justice.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    18/22

    9. Public Participation9. Public Participation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No Public Participation

    See:Endin Case=whistleblower?

    Article 41 & 42:

    Article 411. The public can play a role and assist withthe efforts to avoid and eradicatecorrupt acts.2. Public participation as referred to inparagraph (1) is realized in thefollowing forms:a. the right to seek, obtain and provideinformation on the allegation that acorrupt act has taken place.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    19/22

    9. Public Participation9. Public Participation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No Public Participation

    See:

    Endin Case=whistleblower?

    Article 41 & 42:Article 412b. the right to obtain services in viewing,

    obtaining and providinginformation on the allegation that a corruptact has taken place, to thelaw enforcers who handles the corruptioncase.2c. the right to convey recommendationsand opinions responsibly to lawenforcers who handle the corruption case.2d. the right to obtain replies to theirquestions to law enforcers within amaximum period of 30 (thirty) days.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    20/22

    9. Public Participation9. Public Participation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. .

    No Public Participation

    See:

    Endin Case=whistleblower?

    Article 41 & 42:2d. the right to obtain replies to theirquestions to law enforcers within a

    maximum period of 30 (thirty) days.2e. the right to obtain legal protection in thefollowing matters:(1) exercising the rights as referred to inletters a, b and c.(2) asked to be present in the processes of

    indictment and interrogationin the court session as whistleblowers,witnesses, or expertwitnesses in accordance with me existinglegislations.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    21/22

    9. Public Participation9. Public Participation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. Act No.20/2001

    No Public Participation

    See:

    Endin Case=whistleblower?

    Article 41 (2e):(3) The public as referred to in paragraph (1) hasthe right and

    responsibility in the efforts to prevent anderadicate corrupt acts.(4) The right and responsibility as referred to inparagraphs 2 and 3 areexercised by adhering to the principles orprovisions governed in

    the existing legislations and by abiding to thenorms of society.(5) The provision on the procedure for the publicparticipation inpreventing and eradicating corrupt acts asreferred to in this Article,

    is further governed by a GovernmentalRegulation.

  • 8/3/2019 Comparison Act 3 Th 71 & Act 31 Th 99

    22/22

    9. Public Participation9. Public Participation

    Act No. 3/1971 Act No. 31/1999 jo. Act No.20/2001

    No Public Participation

    See:

    Endin Case=whistleblower?

    Article 42:1. The government gives tokens of appreciationsto members of the

    community who has assisted the efforts toprevent and eradicate corruptacts.2. The provision on the appreciation as referred toin paragraph (1) is furthergoverned in the Government Regulation.


Recommended