+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

Date post: 05-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: chana
View: 32 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD. Magnetic components of intense whistler-mode chorus. Prepared by Ondrej Santolik. 14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting , York, 5-7 Oct 2011. Context. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
10
1 Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD Magnetic components of intense whistler-mode chorus Prepared by Ondrej Santolik 14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, York, 5-7 Oct 2011
Transcript
Page 1: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

1

Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

Magnetic components of intense whistler-mode chorus

Prepared by Ondrej Santolik

14th CAA Cross-Calibration meeting, York, 5-7 Oct 2011

Page 2: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

2

Context

• No comparisons between STAFF SA and WBD using magnetic component had ever been presented. An action was pending:

• CC8 – AI-45 STAFF :To carry out a cross-calibration study between STAFF-SA and WBD as they appears to be not in good agreement with WBD above 700 Hz while WBD/Whisper shows moderately good agreement. O. Santolik was in charge of this action, to be done during the summer.

Page 3: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

3

Power spectrogram of the electric field fluctuations. (WBD)

Power spectrogram of the magnetic field fluctuations.(STAFF-SA)

Parallel component of the Poynting vector normalized by its standard deviation.(STAFF-SA)

Electromagnetic planarity.(STAFF-SA)

SOURCESOURCE

// Bo

\// Bo

Page 4: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

4

ZOOM on SOURCE REGIONZOOM on SOURCE REGION

Selected intervals of WBD magnetic-filed measurements 08:44:55- 8:53:48, compared with the STAFF-SA onboard analyzed data

• WBD • BY component in the spinning spacecraft system (10s ~every 50s when Whisper is active)• FFT of time series corresponding to STAFF-SA 4-s analysis intervals • Power is averaged in frequency intervals of 27 STAFF-SA frequency channels

• STAFF-SA • despun sunward component, analyzed onboard

WBD

Page 5: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

5

WBD and STAFF-SA data in 56 time intervals of 4 s and 27 freq. steps

Page 6: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

6

STAFF-SA Band A

But low power in band A

Page 7: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

7

STAFF-SA Band B

Page 8: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

8

STAFF-SA Band C

Better, but intense waves

Best

Page 9: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

9

A B C

Noise Low waves Strong waves

Page 10: Comparison of STAFF-SA and WBD

10

Results• Large differences of obtained PSD at low frequencies < 60 Hz,

probably linked to the WBD high-pass filters. -> low signal, and no same sensitivity

• Median power ratio for f > 60 Hz is 1-5. STAFF-SA shows higher levels than WBD. (bands B & C)

• Large variations (~one order of magnitude)

• Very intense waves with PSD> 10-7 nT 2/Hz give similar values for STAFF-SA and WBD.

• Proper comparison is difficult, WBD samples one single spinning component, STAFF-SA gives onboard despun data.


Recommended