+ All Categories
Home > Documents > compating for advantage

compating for advantage

Date post: 19-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: asifkhan-khan
View: 41 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
To overcome rivals compitatively
Popular Tags:
46
Competing For Advantage Part III – Creating Competitive Advantage Chapter 7 – Cooperative Strategy
Transcript
Page 1: compating for advantage

Competing For Advantage

Part III – Creating Competitive Advantage

Chapter 7 – Cooperative Strategy

Page 2: compating for advantage

The Strategic Management Process

Page 3: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies

Key Terms

Cooperative Strategy – strategy in which firms work together to achieve a shared objective

Strategic Alliance – cooperative strategy in which firms combine resources and capabilities to create a competitive advantage

Page 4: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies

Key Terms

Co-opetition – condition created when firms that have formed cooperative strategies also compete against one another in the marketplace

Page 5: compating for advantage

Reasons for Cooperative Strategies

Most firms lack the full set of resources and capabilities needed to reach their objectives

Cooperative behavior allows partners to create value that they couldn't develop by acting independently

Aligning stakeholder interests (both inside and outside of the organization) can reduce environmental uncertainty

Alliances can provide a new source of revenue

Page 6: compating for advantage

Reasons for Cooperative Strategies (cont.)

Alliances can be a vehicle for firm growth Alliances can enhance the speed of

responding to market opportunities, technological changes, and global conditions

Alliances allow firms to gain new knowledge and experiences to increase competitiveness

Reasons for using cooperative strategies vary across market type

Page 7: compating for advantage

Reasons for Strategic Alliances by Market Type

Page 8: compating for advantage

Slow-Cycle Markets – Becoming Rare

Privatization of industries and economies

Rapid expansion of the Internet's capabilities

Quick dissemination of information

Speed with which advancing technologies permit imitation of even complex products

Page 9: compating for advantage

Types of Alliances

Key Terms Equity Strategic Alliance – alliance in which two or

more firms own a portion of the equity in the venture they have created

Joint Venture – strategic alliance in which two or more firms create a legally independent company to share resources and capabilities to develop a competitive advantage

Nonequity Strategic Alliance – alliance in which two or more firms develop a contractual relationship to share some of their unique resources and capabilities to create a competitive advantage

Page 10: compating for advantage

Tacit Knowledge

Tacit knowledge – the complex knowledge that is difficult to codify

It is learned through experience

When shared between partnering organizations, it can become a source of competitive advantage

Page 11: compating for advantage

Nonequity Strategic Alliances

A separate independent company is not established

The partnering firms do not take equity positions in a separate entity

The relationship is less formal

The relationship demands fewer partner commitments

Page 12: compating for advantage

Nonequity Strategic Alliances – Types

Licensing agreements

Distribution agreements

Supply contracts

Outsourcing commitments

Page 13: compating for advantage

Strategic Objectives of Cooperative Strategies

Page 14: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Differentiate or Reduce Costs

Complementary strategic alliances

Network cooperative strategies

Page 15: compating for advantage

Complementary Strategic Alliances

Key Terms

Complementary Strategic Alliance – business-level alliances in which firms share some of their resources and capabilities in complementary ways to develop competitive advantages

Page 16: compating for advantage

Complementary Strategic Alliances

Vertical complementary strategic alliances

Horizontal complementary strategic alliances

Page 17: compating for advantage

Complementary Strategic Alliances

Page 18: compating for advantage

Complementary Strategic Alliances – Imbalanced Partner Benefits

Partners may learn at different rates

Partners may have different capabilities to leverage complementary resources

Some firms are more effective at managing alliances and deriving benefits from them

Partners may have different reputations in the marketplace, differentiating the types of actions they can legitimately take

Page 19: compating for advantage

Network Cooperative Strategies

Key Terms

Network Cooperative Strategy – cooperative strategy in which multiple firms agree to form partnerships to achieve shared objectives (also known as alliance networks)

Strategic Center Firm – the firm at the core of an alliance network and around which the network's cooperative relationships revolve

Page 20: compating for advantage

A Strategic Network

Page 21: compating for advantage

Network Cooperative Strategies – Effective Use Knowledge and information gained from multiple sources

can produce more and better innovations

Network alliances can be particularly effective for geographically clustered firms

Effective social relationships and interactions among partners while sharing resources and capabilities lead to more successful network alliances

A strategic center firm that manages the complex, cooperative interactions among network partners also contributes to the effectiveness of network alliances

Gaining access to partners' partners can open up advantages to the networking firms

Multiple collaborations increase the likelihood of additional competitive advantages and value creation

Page 22: compating for advantage

Strategic Center Firm – Primary Tasks

Strategic outsourcing with non-network members

Support of efforts to develop core competencies

Coordination and sharing of technology-based ideas and efforts

Emphasis on healthy rivalry to generate network-based competitive advantages

Page 23: compating for advantage

Two Types of Alliance Networks

Stable Alliance Network

Dynamic Alliance Network

Page 24: compating for advantage

Stable Alliance Networks

Formed in mature industries in which demand is relatively constant and predictable

Directed primarily toward developing products at a low cost

Page 25: compating for advantage

Dynamic Alliance Networks

Used in industries characterized by environmental uncertainty, frequent product innovations, and short product life cycles

Directed primarily toward continued development of products that are uniquely attractive to customers

Page 26: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Address Forces in the External Environment

Competitive response alliances

Uncertainty-reducing alliances

Competition-reducing cooperative strategies

Associations and consortia

Page 27: compating for advantage

Forms of Collusion

Explicit collusion – direct negotiation among firms to establish output levels and pricing agreements that reduce industry competition

Tacit collusion – indirect coordination of production and pricing decisions by several firms, which impacts the degree of competition faced in the industry

Page 28: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Promote Growth and/or Diversification

Diversifying strategic alliances

Franchising

International cooperative strategies

Page 29: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Promote Growth and/or Diversification

Key Terms

Diversifying Strategic Alliances – corporate-level cooperative strategy in which firms share some of their resources and capabilities to diversify into new product or market areas

Page 30: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Promote Growth and/or Diversification

Key Terms

Franchising – cooperative strategy in which a firm uses a franchise as a contractual relationship to describe and control the sharing of its resources and capabilities with partners

Franchise – contractual agreement between two legally independent companies whereby the franchisor grants the right to the franchisee to sell the franchisor's product or do business under its trademarks in a given location for a specified period of time

Page 31: compating for advantage

Cooperative Strategies to Promote Growth and/or Diversification

Key Terms Cross-Border Strategic Alliance – international

cooperative strategy in which firms with headquarters in different nations combine some of their resources and capabilities to create a competitive advantage

Distributed Alliance Network – organizational structure used to manage complex and challenging international cooperative strategies

Page 32: compating for advantage

A Distributed Strategic Network

Page 33: compating for advantage

Attractiveness of Cooperative Strategies to Achieve Growth and/or Diversification

Require fewer resource commitments

Permit greater strategic flexibility

Are not as permanent

Page 34: compating for advantage

Franchising

Partners working closely together, finding ways to strengthen the core company's brand name

Franchisors developing programs to transfer knowledge and skills needed for franchisees to successfully compete at the local level

Franchisees providing feedback to franchisors regarding how to become more effective and efficient

Firms using the strategy in fragmented industries where no firm has a dominant share

Page 35: compating for advantage

Cross-Border Alliances

Multinational corporations outperform firms that operate only domestically

Due to limited domestic growth opportunities, firms look outside their national borders to expand business

Some foreign government policies require investing firms to partner with a local firm to enter their markets

Page 36: compating for advantage

Risks of Cooperative Strategies

Partners may choose to act opportunistically

Partner competencies may be misrepresented

Partner may fail to make available the complementary resources and capabilities that were committed

Partner may make investments specific to the alliance while the other partner may not

Page 37: compating for advantage

Managing Competitive Risks in Cooperative Strategies

Page 38: compating for advantage

Effective Implementation of Cooperative Strategies Internalize successful experiences to gain maximum

value from the knowledge learned, by organizing the knowledge and properly distributing it to those involved with forming and using cooperative strategies

Establish appropriate controls

Assign managerial responsibility for cooperative strategy to high-level executive or team

Increase the level of trust between partners to increase the likelihood of alliance success, thereby efficiently influencing alliance partners' behaviors

Page 39: compating for advantage

Managing Cooperative Strategies

Cost Minimization

Opportunity Maximization

Page 40: compating for advantage

Cost Minimization

Relationship with partner is formalized with contracts

Contracts specify how cooperative strategy is to be monitored and how partner behavior is to be controlled

Goal is to minimize costs and prevent opportunistic behaviors by partners

Costs of monitoring cooperative strategy are greater

Formalities tend to stifle partner efforts to gain maximum value from their participation

Page 41: compating for advantage

Opportunity Maximization

Focus is on maximizing partnership's value-creation opportunities

Informal relationships and fewer constraints allow partners to take advantage of unexpected opportunities, to learn from each other, and explore additional marketplace possibilities

Partners need a high level of trust that each party will act in the partnership's best interest, which is more difficult in international situations

Page 42: compating for advantage

Ethical Questions

From an ethical perspective, how much information is a firm obliged to provide to a potential complementary alliance partner about what it expects to learn from a cooperative arrangement?

Page 43: compating for advantage

Ethical Questions

“A contract is necessary because most firms cannot be trusted to act ethically in a cooperative venture such as a strategic alliance.” In your opinion, is this statement true or false? Why? Does the answer vary by country? Why?

Page 44: compating for advantage

Ethical Questions

Ventures in foreign countries without strong contract law are more risky because managers may be subjected to bribery attempts once their firms’ assets have been invested in the country. How can managers deal with these problems?

Page 45: compating for advantage

Ethical Questions

International strategic alliances are being considered by the world’s airline companies. Do these companies face any ethical issues as they participate in multiple alliances? If so, what are the issues? Are the they different for companies headquartered in the U.S. as compared to those with European home bases? If so, what are the differences, and what accounts for them?

Page 46: compating for advantage

Ethical Questions

Firms with a reputation for ethical behavior in strategic alliances are likely to have more opportunities to form cooperative strategies than those that have not earned this reputation. What actions can firms take to earn a reputation for behaving ethically as a strategic alliance partner?


Recommended