+ All Categories
Home > Marketing > Competing against free

Competing against free

Date post: 16-Jan-2017
Category:
Upload: anuja-rege
View: 40 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
47
Competing against Group 6 Anuja Rege (PGP 31069) | Ayush Trivedi (PGP 31017) | Harsh Chordia (PGP 31264) Sanjay Gupta (PGP 31263) | Samrdhi Ramawat (PGP 31107)
Transcript
Page 1: Competing against free

Competing against

Group 6Anuja Rege (PGP 31069) | Ayush Trivedi (PGP 31017) | Harsh Chordia (PGP 31264)

Sanjay Gupta (PGP 31263) | Samrdhi Ramawat (PGP 31107)

Page 2: Competing against free

A new competitor enters your market…..& offers a product similar to yours

Industry Rivalry increases, right ?

That’s strategy 101 for you

Page 3: Competing against free
Page 4: Competing against free

What if they offer the product for

FREE

Page 5: Competing against free

What would you do ?

Page 6: Competing against free

Introduce your own free product..?

Revenues & Profitability

Page 7: Competing against free

Do nothing and allow the attacker to self destruct..?

Market share

Page 8: Competing against free

Confused ?

…here’s what to do

Page 9: Competing against free

Assess the threatSeriousness of threat depends on 3 factors

Ability to cover costs

Growth in the number of users

Speed with which customers are defecting

Page 10: Competing against free

Choose whether and when to respond

Page 11: Competing against free
Page 12: Competing against free
Page 13: Competing against free
Page 14: Competing against free
Page 15: Competing against free

Once you establish whether and when to respond => next step is to figure out How to Respond?

Page 16: Competing against free

Incumbent’s arsenal of weapons to introduce better free product

Large user base who’ve invested in how to use the product

Advanced technical know-how

Substantial brand equity

Significant financial resources

Market knowledge

Access to important channels – distribution & marketing

Page 17: Competing against free

Four

Strategies

UPSELL

CROSS-SELL

CHARGE THIRD PARTY

BUNDLE

Page 18: Competing against free

• Free basic offering + Premium Version

• Requirements:• Very large user base of free product => even

low conversion rate will help generate significant revenues

• High conversion rate in case user base is small

Page 19: Competing against free

• Free product + Sell other products

• Requirements:• Broad product line,

preferably complements of free product

• Partnerships to sell a broad product line to users of free products

Page 20: Competing against free

CHARGE• Free product + Access fee for

third party

• Requirements:• Third parties willing to pay access

fee +

• A free offering with wide user-base that can be segmented

• A focussed TG that makes up a segment

Page 21: Competing against free

BUNDLE• Free product + Paid offering

• Requirements:• Products/Services that can be bundled with free offering

• Free product needing regular maintenance or a complementary offering

Page 22: Competing against free

Major problem why incumbents fail ??

Page 23: Competing against free

They fail to counter-attack

Page 24: Competing against free
Page 25: Competing against free

• Example 1: Reluctance of newspapers in US to embrace free business model when attacked by Craigslist

• Result: According to authors’ research, Salt Lake City – only top 50 US metro market for classified ads not dominated by Craigslist

Page 26: Competing against free

• Why couldn’t Craigslist dominate Salt Lake City??

• Incumbent Deseret Media responded quickly by changing their business model

• More buyers went to Deseret’s ksl.com than Craigslist

Page 27: Competing against free

•Example 2: Incumbent Intuit vs Mint.com

• Intuit purchased Mint.com and kept its 2 offerings Quicken and Mint separate

Page 28: Competing against free

• Example 3: Yahoomail vs Google’s Gmail

• When Gmail offered 10 times more storage than Yahoo in 2004, Yahoo responded by first matching, then exceeding Gmail’s free storage offer

Page 29: Competing against free

• Example 4: Failure of incumbent airlines in Europe vs RyanAir, which offers free or heavy-discounted tickets and charges for other services

• Result: RyanAir gained impressively, market share exceeding that of Air FRance

Page 30: Competing against free

•Example 5: Incumbent SiriusXM, which offers subscription packages of more than 180 channels vs Pandora, which provides free service over the internet and earns by selling ad-free version and selling access to its user base to third parties.

Page 31: Competing against free

What prevents established companies from making the leap to free product strategies?

Page 32: Competing against free

Belief that products must generate revenues and

profits on their own

Profit-center structure and the

accounting system

Page 33: Competing against free

Profit centers

Advantages

Push P&L accountability

down

Disadvantages

Prevent from separating

product’s revenues and costs

Makes it tough to conceive and

implement a free-product strategy

Page 34: Competing against free

How to prevent this problem??

Page 35: Competing against free

• Profit responsibility must be pushed up to a management group

• Companies primarily relying on free product strategy place this responsibility much higher in the organization than the one that uses as free offering as a small part of a comprehensive strategy

• Another culprit stopping companies’ from pursuing free product strategy is

Cost accounting system• Stepping back from cost accounting

gives flexibility

Page 36: Competing against free

Free product strategy

Entails-

Experimentation

Risk taking

Require cultural shift

Strong leadership will be needed for

Mounting a competitive

response

Revamping organizational

structures

Questioning cost accounting information

Page 37: Competing against free

Indian Context

Page 38: Competing against free

Lenskart is offering first frame free on signup

Charging users for only lenses

Strategy to quickly build consumer base

Page 39: Competing against free

“Lenskart is growing at more than 40%. However, the growth rate is mainly attributable to small base. And the defection rate among the existing players is also not large. Hence, the threat posed by Lenskart is not

immediate and the services can co-exist”

Page 40: Competing against free

• Domino’s buy 1 get 1 free on delivery offer has helped it to wean away consumers from Pizza Hut which focuses on fine dining experience

• Selective use of the offer has helped Domino’s to reduce its store size and focus more on delivery

• The offer has helped Domino’s to expand its customer base at a very fast pace

Page 41: Competing against free

“The growth rate for Domino’s is less than 40% however the defection rate for its competitors is high. Hence, competitors need to take immediate action”

Page 42: Competing against free

• To boost its sales, Myntra offers buy 1 get 1 – even buy 1 get 2 free at times.

• These offers are launched for a limited period as a part of a sale, or even during some days for a specific time to induce sales.

Page 43: Competing against free

“For a well-established player like Jabong, the threat from Myntra was not perceived as serious. It was seldom that Jabong offered similar offers as that of Buy One Get One for their products.”

Source: https://yourstory.com/2016/07/jabong-myntra-flipkart/

Page 44: Competing against free

• Netflix recently launched in India in Jan’16 offering 1 month of streaming free

Page 45: Competing against free

However, pay per view companies such as BigFlix, Shemaroo, UTV or Cable TV service providers with pay per view movies such as Tata Sky Showcase are not affected at all!!!

Page 46: Competing against free

“With an already well-established customer base, and lower tendency of Indian customer to enroll for monthly paid viewing subscriptions, Indian companies perceive very minor threat from Netflix. Strategy may not change till Netflix achieves significant growth rate or companies are affected by significant defection.”

Page 47: Competing against free

These slides were prepared by Anuja Rege, Ayush Trivedi, Harsh Chordia, Sanjay Gupta and Samrdhi Ramawat as a part of the course “Brand Management” taught by Prof. Sameer Mathur

Marketing Professor 2009 – 2013

Ph.D. and M.S. (Marketing) 2003 – 2009

Marketing Professor 2013 – Present

Indian Institute of Management, Lucknow

DISCLAIMER


Recommended