http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 952 [email protected]
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (IJMET)
Volume 10, Issue 2, February 2019, pp;952-964Article ID: IJMET_10_02_100
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=2
ISSN Print: 0976-6340 and ISSN Online: 0976-6359
© IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
COMPUTER INTEGRATED OVERLOAD RELAY
TESTING ANDDATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
USING NI MY-DAQ INSTRUMENT
S. Merlin Gilbert Raj
Dept of ECE, Karunya Institute of Technology & Sciences, Coimbatore
M.L. Merlin Sajini
Dept of EEE, Coimbatore Institute of Technology, Coimbatore
ABSTRACT
Thermal overload relays used for motor protection are most demanded in the
commercial and domestic market. Batch line process is followed for overload relay
assembly and testing. Testing Phase include test for several conditions like trip test, no
trip test, mid trip test for suitable current ratings specified in the datasheet and
continuity test. Existing test system carries out the testing procedure by human
intervention to manually set up the test cases and test reports are generated. It’s
observed, the thermal overload relays passed in the test phase incurs high failure rate
in the market scenario. The problem of thermal overload relay testing is addressed in
this work, considering the combination of modern enabling technologies for data
acquisitions and test measurement meters. An overload voltage protection PCB is
developed to safety measure the data acquisition device. A computer integrated
experimental test set-up is proposed to automate the overload relay testing process
using NI myDAQ LabVIEW instrument. G-programming is used to implement the
overload relay testing algorithm. Graphical user interface build in LabVIEW supports
the testing operator to set the reference current ratings and reference trip time. Test
reports data such as trip/non-trip/mid trip time current curves can be monitored and
stored for various test cases are stored in the database through LabVIEW.
Keywords Thermal Overload Relay, Automation testing, NI myDAQ, LabVIEW
Cite this Article S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini Computer Integrated
Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq Instrument
International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology (10)(2), pp;952-964
http://www.iaeme.com/ijmet/issues.asp?JType=IJMET&VType=10&IType=2
1. INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the quantity and complexity of electric circuits is constantly increasing, especially
in the automotive industry. The electrical contact has always been an essential part of the
electric circuit. Therefore, ensuring reliable connections is crucial to manage a successful
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 953 [email protected]
operation of the system. Most electrical circuits have overload protections that break the power
supply in the event of an electric overload. These protections consist of automatic circuit
breakers, i.e., electrical switches designed to protect a circuit from damage caused by
overcurrent or short circuits. Its basic function is to interrupt current flow if a certain
requirement is not fulfilled and the system is at risk. Another device that enables the interruption
of the current in an electric circuit, in case of overload, is the fuse which operates once and then
must be replaced. However, unlike fuses, overload protection relays can be reset, either
manually or automatically, to restore normal operation.
The purpose of this proposed work is to develop a test method for a thermal overload
protection relay in order to create a general guideline with recommendations on how the
reliability of relays should be verified.
Thermal relays are commonly used as protective elements that automatically break an
electric circuit to prevent overheating. This overheating can be produced in case of overcurrent;
therefore, these mechanisms are often used as overload protection. When the thermal relays are
heated up followed by cooled down, it provides movement for switching. This movement is
due the property of bimetallic strip which, bends to switch ON/OFF circuit.
Jingying Zhao et.al [1] proposed consistency study on over-load relay based on its
functional characteristics, focal failure ways, the reliability assessment method, the sampling
theory and the reliability test theory method. The mentioned methods depend upon the
reliability characteristic value, time dependent test plan, sample based experimental study and
measurement of reliability test practice. In this paper, randomly picked samples from the batch
of arranged products only are tested for its functionality and so the failure rate is high. YanYan
Luo et.al [2] conducted failure analysis for various types of miniature circuit breakers using the
reliability compliance test to enhance the consistency level. N. I. Santoso et.al [3] proposed a
simulator to test the microprocessor controlled protective relays. The simulator in the test zig
generate the relevant voltage and current resolutions/divs to detect the corresponding events
from the system. Kernel based programs in the test monitor the entire process in the test.
Over past years, LabVIEW Workbench was getting familiar to build prototype models using
the G-programming approach in the areas of mechanical, biomedical engineering and electronic
engineering [4]. Jung-Chuan Chou et.al [5] proposed a fault diagnosis approach using
LabVIEW workbench-based test and measurement system for flexible array pH sensors.
Changting Wang et.al builds graphical user interface which could conduct the online
measurement and acquires data to projects in time and frequency domain respectively for
monitoring the combined bearing condition [6]. Amine Yazidi et.al [7] presents a web-based
monitoring and fault detection using integrated LabVIEW workbench for AC Electrical
Machines. On the whole further details on extensiveness of LabVIEW based Workbench for
various applications can be found in [8-12]
In this paper, complete virtual and interactive software was developed for performing
functionality test to achieve reliability and quality of the over-load relay. LabVIEW based
Workbench to conduct functional testing in thermal overload relay is found to be first initiative.
The developed reliability test method for over-load relays includes various test criteria. The test
criteria of over-load relays include three trip points of over-load current, that is, 1.05 times
current, 1.25 times current, 1. 5 times current for the reliability test. The tested BR-Bimetallic
Overload Relay consists of Three-Phase protection with bimetals to detect the over load current
through the heating of the conducting strip. Bimetallic Overload Relay are available in five
frames for motor full load currents from 0.28A – 112 A.
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 954 [email protected]
2 THERMAL OVERLOAD RELAY CHARACTERISTICS
Very often, thermal overload relays are used to protect the motor. Fig 1 shows the three-phase
thermal overload relay and aesthetic appearance. The temperature of the bimetallic strip
increases due to increase in temperature of motor. A strong relationship can be obtained using
the heating curves of motor and thermal overload relay. For a specific dial setting, the overload
relay promises to protect the motor by not tripping the relay unnecessarily. Fig 2. shows the
Wilbur graph sketching the variations of tripping current with respect to tripping time for
specific dial setting currents.
Figure 1 Thermal Overload Relay
Figure 2 Dial Setting Current Vs Time
3 CONVENTIONAL OLR TEST PROCEDURES
The testing of overload relays involves various stages [1].
a. Category tests
b. Production tests
c. Commissioning tests
d. Maintenance tests.
Type Test is conducted based on the written specification and compliance standards. It
ensures the pass or fail of relay mainly under the fault operating conditions. During Production
tests, relays are tested for defects during manufacturing. Various test points are charted to detect
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 955 [email protected]
the problems earlier and save time. Commissioning Tests are framed to ensure the protection
scheme is appropriately settled during the installation process. Including correctness of the
equipment, wiring check and operation checks are schematically followed during the test
process. Maintenance checks are required to find out the appropriateness of the equipment on
time.
In this work, we focussed on factory production test. Overload relays are ranked based on
the duration of trip time under faulty conditions. The thermal overload relay samples are tested
and validated by manual testing and the trip time, no trip time and mid trip time datas are
recorded manually.
3.1. TESTING OF OLRs FOR TRIP CLASS IN INDUSTRIES
After manufacturing, the overload relays are tested for trip time in order to categorize the OLRs
based on trip time. The testing process involves giving the 230V coil supply to the contactor
and passing certain amount of current through the OLR with contactor either through single
phase or three phase supply. The amount of current to be passed is calculated according to the
dial setting in the OLR, which the dial setting is multiplied by a certain factor to calculate the
current as shown in Fig 3.
Figure 3 Adjustable Current Settings in OLR
3.2. PROBLEM WITH THE EXISTING METHOD
• After the OLR trips while testing, the trip time of the OLR is noted down manually from
the testing panel which has high probability of manual errors.
• The coil supply is also not cut off until the operator disconnects the supply which leads
to wastage of power.
• The trip time noted down are stored into the computer manually which is time
consumption.
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 956 [email protected]
Figure 4 Manual Testing of OLR
In order to overcome the drawbacks in the existing manual testing method as shown in Fig
4, we focussed on extending the factory production test using Virtual Instrumentation platform.
To overcome the error and false rate in test cases due to human interventions, here we deployed
NI myDAQ hardware to monitor the flow of current in overload relay under various test cases.
3.3 PROPOSED AUTOMATED OLR TESTING SYSTEM
LabVIEW (Laboratory Virtual Instrument Engineering Workbench) from National Instruments
is used as a platform to automate the OLR testing and report generation process as shown in
Fig 6. Fig 5 shows the automation testing for overload relays.The OLR samples tested and
validated by manual testing method has larger failure rate in the market. Also, the trip time, no
trip time and mid trip time datas are recorded manually. This requires one person has to monitor
and log the datas in the test sheet which consumes time. Hence, there is a need for automated
test process. The error and false rate in test cases due to human interventions can be avoided by
this automated method.
Figure 5 Automated Testing of OLR
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 957 [email protected]
Figure 6 Block Diagram of Automated Test-Tool
NI myDAQ is a portable data acquisition (DAQ) device that uses NI LabVIEW-based
software instruments to measure and analyze real-world signals as shown in Fig 7. Combined
with NI LabVIEW on the PC, it can analyze, and process acquired signal and control the
automated system depending on programming the input output pins of myDAQ in LabVIEW.
Figure 7 NI myDAQ
The myDAQ is interfaced with the OLR where the high current is passed for testing. Hence
the protection circuit has been used in order to prevent any backflow of high current into
myDAQ pins since the pins are designed for low current applications. Specially designed
protection circuit for myDAQ is shown in Fig 8. Also Fig.9 shows the Protection Circuit Board,
Figure 8 Protection Circuit Layout
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 958 [email protected]
Figure 9 Protection Circuit Assemble and Soldered
4.1 OVERLOAD RELAY TESTING PROCEDURE
Step:1 OLR with contactor, Ammeter, Rheostat load are connected in series to 230V supply
through auto transformer.
Step:2 The NC terminals of OLR and the enable pins of the Opto-coupler which controls
coil supply are connected to the programmed pins in DAQ.
Step:3The coil supply to the OLR is controlled by the 5V relay by enabling the optocoupler
pins through programming.
Step: 4 Set the current according to the dial setting in the OLR.
Step: 5 Scan the barcode value of the OLR’s into the LabVIEW using barcode scanner.
Step:6 Switch ON the Boolean switch in the LabVIEW that controls the 230V coil supply
to OLR.
Step:7 Two Boolean indicators are used in LabVIEW to indicate the conduction between
two NC terminals when there is flow of current in the OLR.
Step:8 Run the program and the timer in LabVIEW starts as the coil supply is enabled.
Step:9 After certain time the healthy OLR trips according to the predefined time with
respect to dial setting for current whereas the faulty OLR wil not trip in the predefined t ime.
Step: 10 When the OLR trips the conduction between the NC terminals of OLR breaks
which is detected through DAQ.
Step: 11 After the detection of tripping by DAQ the timer stops automatically, and the coil
supply is disabled automatically.
Step: 12 After tripping the Boolean switches for indicating the coil suppy to OLR and the
conduction between the NC terminals OFF automatically.
Step: 13 In case of multiple OLR testing the coil supply of the tripped OLR alone will be
disabled by programming whereas the coil supply of other OLRs will be enabled till it trips.
Step:14 The OLRs that didn’t trip with respect to the predefined time are indicated as faulty
in LabVIEW.
Step: 15 The barcode value and the trip time (current) is stored together and is loaded into
the MS-Excel which can be used for further reference.
Step: 16 OLRs can also be sorted out automatically in LabVIEW according to the given trip
time.
Step: 17 The trip time of any tested OLR can be checked by simply scanning the barcode
value of the OLR into the LabView.
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 959 [email protected]
TEST SETUP IN LABVIEW
The front panel control for the OLR testing is designed in such a way to show the barcode, trip
time, current, dial setting and also the status of the OLR while testing. The front panel is made
as user interface where the operator can set the lower and the upper time limit for testing the
OLR for trip time. If the OLR trips below the time limit then the FAULTY indication is ON, if
it trips within the time limit then the HEALTHY indication is ON and if the OLR does not trip
even after the time limit then the FAULTY indication is automatically ON.
Figure.11 Front Panel of the Test setup in LabVIEW
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 960 [email protected]
Test Setup
Figure 12 Entire Experimental setup
Figure 13 OLR in test setup
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The overload relays are tested for No trip test, Mid Trip Test and Trip Test for three trip
points of over-load current, that is, 1.05 times current, 1.25 times current, 1. 5 times of
maximum and minimum values of test current manually and the test reports for the three types
of test is given as follows.
This same method of testing of thermal overload relays are done through the proposed
method and the trip signals for healthy and faulty relays are shown below.
From all the trip signals for maximum and minimum dial setting of current values the faulty
relay trips before the normal trip time of the relay it has to withstand.
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 961 [email protected]
Figure 14 No Trip Test –Maximum Dial Setting (6.8 A)
Figure 15 No Trip Test –Minimum Dial Setting (4.32 A)
Figure 16 Trip Test – Maximum Dial Setting (7.87 A)
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 962 [email protected]
Figure 17 Trip Test- Minimum Dial Setting(5A)
Figure 18 Mid Trip Test (7.72A)
6 CONCLUSION & FUTURE SCOPE
Since Automation in product development is on high demand nowadays, this project meets the
automation requirements of the Relay manufacturing companies. The proposed automated
Relay testing process helps to avoid the tedious manual testing methods and documentation
procedure, thereby reducing the time consumed during the testing process as well as technical
details of the OLR can be obtained easily by just scanning the barcode. The coil supply to the
OLR is automatically cut off after it trips in order to protect it. The trip time of the OLR is also
obtained as soon as the testing process is completed. The Front Panel Control is made as user
interface to set the lower and upper time into the program before running, which can be used to
find the condition of the OLR, i.e., HEALTHY or FAULTY. The customized report of the
technical details of the OLR are automatically stored in an excel file and the data are processed
for further reference. The proposed automated test-tool can also be extended for a large number
of OLR testing
. To make a fully automated testing system where the OLRs are being picked up
automatically from the assembly unit and are placed on the test-tool for the testing process. This
test-tool also has convenience in connecting to all necessary pins of OLRs automatically after
its being placed on the test-tool. Once, the testing process is completed, the healthy and faulty
Computer Integrated Overload Relay Testing Anddata Management System Using Ni My-Daq
Instrument
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 963 [email protected]
OLRs are separated by the system itself and the whole process report is stored in the company
server.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to thank Karunya Institute of Technology & Sciences for providing the
infrastructure to complete the project successfully.
REFERENCES
[1] Jingying Zhao, Jianguo Lu (S.M ofIEEE), Haitao Wang, Guojin Liu ,“Study on Reliability
Test Method of Over-load Relay,”in Proceedings of the 52nd IEEE Holm Conference on
Electrical Contacts, Montreal, QC, Canada, 25-27 Sept. 2006,pp.58-62.
[2] Luo Yanyan1, Lu Jianguo1, Meng Fanbin1, Li Chunxia2, Liu Zhijun3, “Study on the
Reliability Test and Failure Analysis of Automotive Relays at High Temperature”, in Proc. 26th International Conference on Electrical Contacts (ICEC 2012), Beijing, China
,14-17 May 2012.
[3] N. I. Santoso, Member, IEEE and J. Y. Avins, Member, IEEE, “Real-Time Software Testing
for Microprocessor-Based Protective Relays”, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. Vol.
9. No. 3, pp.1359 -1367, July 1994.
[4] J. Hakala, V.-V. Elomaa, T. Eronen, U. Hager, A. Jokinen, and J. Äysto, “The JYFLTRAP Control and Measurement System,” Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Section B Beam
Interact. Mater. Atoms, vol. 266, nos. 19–20, pp. 4628–4631, Oct. 2008.
[5] Jung-Chuan Chou, Chin-Yi Lin, Yi-Hung Liao, Jie-Ting Chen, Ya-Li Tsai, Jia-Liang Chen,
Hsueh-Tao Chou, “Data Fusion and Fault Diagnosis for Flexible Arrayed pH Sensor
Measurement System Based on LabVIEW”, IEEE Sensors Journal, VOL. 14, NO. 5, pp.1405-1411, MAY 2014.
[6] Changting Wang, Robert X. Gao, “A Virtual Instrumentation System for Integrated Bearing
Condition Monitoring”, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, VOL. 49,
NO. 2, pp. 325- 332, APRIL 2000.
[7] Amine Yazidi, Humberto Henao, Gérard-André Capolino, Franck Betin, Fiorenzo
Filippetti, “A Web-Based Remote Laboratory for Monitoring and Diagnosis of AC
Electrical Machines”, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, VOL. 58, NO. 10, pp.4950-4958, OCTOBER 2011.
[8] H.Spoelder,A.Ullings,andF.Groen,“Virtual Instrumentation: A survay of standards and the
inter relation, ”in Proc.1997IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conf.
(IMTC/97), vol. 1, Ottawa, Ont., Canada, May 1997, pp. 676–681.
[9] Instrumentation Reference and Catalog, National Instruments Corp., 1995.
[10] J. Brignell and A. Taner, “Virtual instrumentation and Intelligent sensors,” Sens. Actuators,
vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 427–430, June 1997.
[11] E. McConnell, “Future of virtual instrumentation,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 22–24, July
1997.
[12] J.Wright, “Virtual instrumentation cuts test setup time,” Noise Vibration Worldwide, vol.
27, no. 11, pp. 13–15, Dec. 1996.
[13] LabVIEW User Manual, National Instruments, 1996.
[14] Khichada Bhavin A, K.J. Chudashma, Vyas Darshan M and Shiyal Jignesh D, 3- Phase
Induction Motor Parameter Monitoring and Analysis Using Labview. International Journal
of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 7(6), 2016, pp. 81–91.
[15] Palash Rajepandhare, Govardhan Bhatt and Abhyuday Titiksh, Comparison of LabVIEW
with SAP 2000 and NONLIN for Structural Dynamics Problems. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(2), 2017, pp. 226–235.
S. Merlin Gilbert and Raj M.L. Merlin Sajini
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp 964 [email protected]
[16] Belkeri Sai Prakash, Mandalapu Lavanya Sree, R Sai Saranya and
[17] R Karthik. Design and Implementation of Virtual Laboratory Using LabVIEW &
[18] myDAQ. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 8(5),
[19] 2017, pp. 744–748.
[20] Vipul Kumar Sharma and Ajeet Kumar, Integration of Heating
[21] System Using Output Signal of myDAQ Controlled by Labview, International Journal
[22] of Mechanical Engineering and Technology 8(11), 2017, pp. 403–412.
[23] Bharati. S R1 Parvathi. C S2 and P. Bhaskar2International Journal of Electronics and
Communication Engineering & Technology (IJECET), ISSN 0976464(Print), ISSN 0976 –
6472(Online), Volume 5, Issue 2, February (2014), pp. 83-92 © IAEME