Date post: | 14-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | hunter-bragg |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Computer-Mediated Computer-Mediated Communication and Video Communication and Video Chat Chat
Randall SadlerRandall Sadler
University of Illinois @University of Illinois @
Urbana-ChampaignUrbana-Champaign
What is CMC/NBLT?
Computer-Mediated Communication (for language learning) is the use of computers connected by networks to engage in authentic communication with other language learners and/or teachers.
“NBLT represents a new and different side of CALL, where human-to-human communication is the focus” (Kern &
Warschauer, 2000, p. 1).
•Many of these influenced by The Audiolingual Approach
•Aka, Drill and Kill
How is that different from CALL?
“…CALL has traditionally been associated with self-contained, programmed applications such as tutorials, drills, simulations, instructional games, tests, and so on” (Kern
& Warschauer, 2000, p. 1) .
A VERY short review of research…
Email: Absalon & Marden, 2004; Biesenbach-Lucas & Weasenforth, 2001; Fedderholdt, 2001; O'Dowd, 2003; Shang, 2003
Message Boards: Benton, 1996; Kamhi-Stein, 2000; Ware, 2004
MUDs and MOOs: Kötter, 2001b; Peterson, 2001; Weininger & Shield, 2003
Text Chat: Bearden, 2003; Freiermuth, 2002; Perez, 2003; D. B. Smith, 2001; Tudini, 2003; Williams, 2003
Okay, a fairly short review…
Audio Chat: Cziko & Park, 2003; Hampel & Hauck, 2004; Kötter, 2001a; Kötter, Shield, & Stevens, 1999; Lamy, 2004
Video Conferencing: Goodfellow et al., 1996; Kinginger, 1998; Matthews, 1998; McAndrew, Foubister, & Mayes, 1996; Egert, 2000
Video Chat: Wang, 2004
Research Questions
1. What programs are freely available for engaging in synchronous video chat?
2. How different are these tools from each other in terms of technical and pedagogical issues?
3. How suitable are these programs for personal communication?
4. How suitable are these programs for language teaching purposes?
What did the study do?
Evaluated 8 freely available video chat programs
1. CU-See Me World
2. ICQ
3. MSN Messenger
4. Paltalk
5. Skype
6. Yahoo Messenger
Participants
Turkey 8 MATEFL students 4 female & 4 male Taking course on
“The use of computers for language learning”
US 10 MA TESL students 5 male & 5 female U.S., Argentina,
China, Cambodia, and Korea
Taking course on “CMC for Language Teaching”
Procedure
Groups of 2-3 students used each program for international communication
Each student completed a 28-item questionnaire for each tool & a final questionnaire3,132 item responses total
Results
Tool M (over 95) SD Rank
MSN 80.50 13.10 1
Skype 76.55 9.30 2
Yahoo 56.44 14.23 3
ICQ 46.77 15.20 4
CUworld 41.83 15.16 5
Paltalk 35.61 16.63 6
Paired t-tests15 possible combinations of video tool pairs.
MSN Messenger
Skype
Yahoo ICQ
ICQ CUworld
CUworld Paltalk
Items on the questionnaire
CU World
ICQ MSN Paltalk Skype Yahoo
website user friendly
2.29 (6) 3.18 (5) 4.18 (2) 3.27 (4) 4.39 (1) 3.67 (3)
easy to install 2.41 (6) 3.41 (5) 4.73 (1) 3.73 (4) 4.44 (2) 4.00 (3) easy to setup 2.59 (6) 3.44 (5) 4.67 (1) 3.73 (4) 4.38 (2) 4.00 (3)
Tec
h Is
sues
good help/support
2.90 (3) 2.80 (5) 3.67 (1) 2.40 (6) 3.73 (2) 2.85 (4)
easy to use 2.53 (6) 3.00 (4) 4.69 (1) 2.64 (5) 4.28 (2) 3.65 (3) easy to add members
3.18 (6) 3.29 (5) 4.53 (1) 3.53 (4) 4.06 (2) 4.06 (2)
easy to start a conversation
2.82 (5) 3.06 (4) 4.67 (1) 2.60 (6) 4.50 (2) 3.44 (3)
Use
issu
es
easy to see if others were online
3.33 (5) 3.81 (4) 4.82 (1) 3.13 (6) 4.35 (2) 4.12 (3)
Average 2.75 3.25 4.50 3.13 4.27 3.72
Average Rank 5.36 4.25 1.13 4.89 1.89 3.00
Technical & Use Issues
What they liked/disliked
High audio and video qualityAbility to make landline callsFamiliarity
No possibility for multi-user video chatSkype—small user video
What they liked/disliked
“Potential” for multi-user chatPre-existing interest groups
Free usage restrictedButton turn-taking (Paltalk)Technical Issues (CUworld)Wow/Yikes Factor
The Middle 3rd—Yahoo & ICQ (Transitional Tools)
FreeMultiuser video chat for free—ICQ
Some video and audio issuesAnnoying extra software (Yahoo)Chat overload—317