Conal Smith27 June 2012
Subjective Well-being: what we know and what we need to know
Subjective well-being and the OECD
Better policies for better lives
Better measures Subjective well-beingSocial contactGovernance…
What we thought we knew
• Subjective well-being is just “happiology”
• People have a “set point” to which their level of subjective well-being always returns (people fully adapt to changes in their circumstances)
• There is no meaningful change in national levels of subjective well-being over time
• Everyone is “mostly satisfied” with their life (people’s responses depend entirely on their frame of reference)
• People object to answering such general questions
1. SWB is not just about happiness
Positive and Negative affect
(experience of joy, happiness,
anxiety, sadness…)
Life evaluation (reflective
assessment)
Drivers of well-being
(income, health status, social connections, education…)
Eudaimonic well-being
(self-perceptions of autonomy, competence, purpose…)
Recall
2. There is no set point for SWB
Lucas, R., Clark, A., Georgellis, Y. and Diener, E. (2003), "Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: Reactions to changes in marital status", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
2. There is no set point for SWB
Lucas, R., Clark, A, Georgellis, Y. and Diener, E. (2004), "Unemployment alters the set point of life satisfaction", Psychological Science.
3. National SWB levels can change
4. Not “mostly satisfied”
4. Not “mostly satisfied”
4. Not “mostly satisfied”
5. SWB has low item-specific non-response rates
11
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
luxe
mbo
urg
ic
elan
d
switz
erla
nd
finla
nd
braz
il
italy
de
nmar
k
spai
n
aust
ralia
ne
ther
land
s
new
zea
land
ir
elan
d
chile
ja
pan
ch
ina
m
exic
o
sout
h ko
rea
gr
eece
so
uth
afri
ca
indo
nesi
a
germ
any
un
ited
king
dom
no
rway
sl
ovak
ia
cana
da
fran
ce
port
ugal
sw
eden
in
dia
au
stri
a
esto
nia
tu
rkey
un
ited
stat
es
slov
enia
ru
ssia
be
lgiu
m
hung
ary
is
rael
cz
ech
repu
blic
po
land
Gallup World Poll, waves 1-5, life satisfaction, education, and marital status, refusal to answer by country
Life Satisfaction
Education
Marital Status
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
25.00%
30.00%
35.00%
40.00%
Nor
way
Aus
tria
Net
herl
ands
Luxe
mbo
urg
Hun
gary
Slov
enia
Nor
ther
n Ir
elan
dM
alta
Esto
nia
Finl
and
Russ
ian
Fede
ratio
nTu
rkey
Fran
ceSp
ain
Belg
ium
Ger
man
yG
reec
eG
reat
Bri
tain
Den
mar
kCy
prus
Switz
erla
ndM
oldo
vaPo
land
Aze
rbai
jan
Latv
iaG
eorg
iaA
rmen
iaCr
oatia
Port
ugal
Irel
and
Nor
ther
n Cy
prus
Mon
tene
gro
Ukr
aine
Serb
iaBo
snia
Her
zego
vina
Czec
h Re
publ
icLi
thua
nia
Koso
voIta
lyRo
man
iaSw
eden
Bulg
aria
Icel
and
Bela
rus
Alb
ania
Slov
ak R
epub
licM
aced
onia
European Values Survey, 2008, income and life satisfaction, refusal to answer, by country
Income
Life Satisfaction
12
5. SWB has low item-specific non-response rates
What we need to know
• Is eudaimonic well-being uni-dimensional or multi-dimensional?
• What is the minimal set of measures needed to adequately capture affect?
• What is best practice in domain-specific well-being questions?
• How important is cultural bias?
Affect and Eudaimonia
ONS core questions on subjective well-being – life satisfaction, life worthwhile, happy yesterday, anxious yesterday
Eudaimonia
Source: Huppert, F. and So, T. (2011) “Flourishing across Europe: Application of a new conceptual framework for defining well-being.”, Social Indicators Research
Affect measures
Draft OECD Affect questions
The following questions ask about how you felt yesterday. I will now read out a list of ways you might have felt yesterday. Did you experience the following feelings a lot yesterday?
C1. How about enjoyment? [YES/NO]
C2. How about calm and peaceful? [YES/NO]
C3. How about worry? [YES/NO]
C4. How about sadness? [YES/NO]
C5. How about happy? [YES/NO]
C6. How about depressed? [YES/NO]
C7. How about anger? [YES/NO]
C8. How about stress? [YES/NO]
C9. How about physical pain? [YES/NO]
C10. Did you smile or laugh a lot yesterday?
[YES/NO]
Affect measuresDraft OECD domain evaluation questions
The following questions ask how satisfied you feel about specific aspects of your life, on a scale from 0 to 10. Zero means you feel”completely dissatisfed” and 10 means “completely satisfied”.
E1. How satisfied are you with your standard of living? [0-10]
E2. How satisfied are your with your health? [0-10]
E3. How satisfied are you with what you are achieving in life? [0-10]
E4. How satisfied are you with your personal relationships? [0-10]
E5. How satisfied are you with how safe you feel? [0-10]
E6. How satisfied are you with feeling part of your community? [0-10]
E7. How satisfied are you with your future security? [0-10]
E8. How satisfied are you with the amount of time you have to do the things that you like
doing?
[0-10]
For respondents who are employed only
E9. How satisfied are you with your job? [0-10]
Cultural bias
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
8.5
12 12.5 13 13.5 14 14.5 15 15.5 16 16.5 17
Mean life satisfaction vs log of GDP per capita, OECD and selected countries, 2010
Brazil, Chile, Mexico
Japan, Korea
Cultural bias
• Country-specific effects may have at least four sources:– 1) Unmeasured life circumstances.
– 2) Differences in how people feel about their life circumstances.
– 3) Language differences that influence scale use.
– 4) Cultural response biases.