+ All Categories
Home > Education > Configuration study

Configuration study

Date post: 23-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: mathesonm
View: 311 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Siskiyou Union High School District 9-10, 11-12 configuration study. Mount Shasta High School and Weed High School
Popular Tags:
39
Siskiyou Union High School District School Configuration Study 9-10 * 11-12
Transcript
Page 1: Configuration study

Siskiyou Union High School District

School Configuration Study9-10 * 11-12

Page 2: Configuration study

OutcomesDevelop a base understanding of our

current and future enrollment and economic conditions.

Seek an answer to the question: ◦Would a 9-10 and 11-12 configuration of our

high school programs and services better serve the students in our communities?

Develop a framework and process for the communities to work together to meet the needs of our students.

Gather input.Identify other ideas and potential concepts.

Page 3: Configuration study

AgendaPresentation of the Study

◦Answer questions as we goResponse and input about the

study◦Include other ideas

Questions and next steps◦Including how we will make a

decision

Page 4: Configuration study

Roles and ResponsibilitiesListenGenerate questionsTreat everyone with respectWe will document what is said

and the ideas that are generated

Page 5: Configuration study

Presentation OutlineFinancial and Structural

◦Fiscal ramifications ◦Facility needs

Program potential◦Are there compelling reasons for this

changePros and Cons

◦What are the pros and cons of this change

Next Steps

Page 6: Configuration study

BudgetThe current economic crisis is forcing

school districts to take a critical look at all financial aspects of operations and programs.

The current cut to the SUHSD budget is $1,200 per ADA annually.

We have reduced expenditures while trying to maintain the quality and quantity of programs our students and communities expect of our high schools.

Page 7: Configuration study

Budget Chart

2006-2007 (UA)

2007-2008 (UA)

2008-2009 (UA)

2009-2010 Budget

2009-2010 1st Int.

2009-2010 2nd Int.

2010-2011 Budget

Series1 9805605 9265719 8703520.79 7642533 7153369 7160833 6672300

$1,000,000.00

$3,000,000.00

$5,000,000.00

$7,000,000.00

$9,000,000.00

$11,000,000.00

District Total Revenue

Page 8: Configuration study

EnrollmentNot only is SUHSD faced with a

declining budget because of the economy, we are facing a decline in enrollment.

The current and future decline in enrollment compounds the deteriorating financial condition the poor economy has created.

As our schools get smaller, program offerings become more limited.

Page 9: Configuration study

Enrollment History

2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011

Happy Camp High 83 90 84 87 86 83

McCloud High 5 9 8 13 13 21

Mount Shasta High

416 386 439 423 400 369

Weed High 227 191 198 195 200 194

Jefferson High 30 35 27 25 24 32

Happy Camp CDS 5 4 4 3 3 0

South County CDS 2 3 2 5 3 0

Total 768 718 762 751 729 699

50150250350450550650750

CBEDS (October)EnrollmentEnro

llm

ent

Page 10: Configuration study

Staffing

2005-06

2006-07

2007-08

2008-09

2009-10

2010-11

Administration 5 NaN 5 NaN 5 NaN 5 NaN 5 NaN 5

Certificated 58.22 NaN 57.12 NaN 54.87 NaN 53.21 NaN 48.47 NaN 45

Classified 28.05 NaN 28.49 NaN 27.62 NaN 27.58 NaN 25.71 NaN 25

Classified Conf. 3 NaN 3 NaN 3 NaN 3 NaN 3 NaN 3

5.00

15.00

25.00

35.00

45.00

55.00

65.00

5 5 5 5 5 5

58.22 57.1254.87

53.21

48.4745

28.05 28.49 27.62 27.5825.71 25

3 3 3 3 3 3

District Staffing

Sta

ffing

Page 11: Configuration study

Projected EnrollmentChart 1A

Projected Enrollment Chart 1A

Grade 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Mount Shasta High School

12 90 99 85 92 92 65 65 81 87 65

11 99 86 93 93 66 66 82 88 66 64

10 88 95 95 68 68 84 90 68 66 72

9 97 97 70 70 86 92 70 68 74 74

Total 374 377 343 323 312 307 307 305 293 275

Weed High School

12 37 46 40 53 40 48 55 54 45 45

11 47 41 54 41 49 56 55 46 46 36

10 42 55 42 50 57 56 47 47 37 50

9 56 43 51 58 57 48 48 38 51 56

Total 182 185 187 202 203 208 205 185 179 187

Total 556 562 530 525 515 515 512 490 472 462

Page 12: Configuration study

Projected Enrollment and StaffingChart 2A

Projected Enrollment and Teaching Staff Chart 2A

Grade 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Mount Shasta High School

12 90 99 85 92 92 65 65 81 87 65

11 99 86 93 93 66 66 82 88 66 64

10 88 95 95 68 68 84 90 68 66 72

9 97 97 70 70 86 92 70 68 74 74

Total 374 377 343 323 312 307 307 305 293 275

Teachers 18 17 15.6 14.7 14.2 14.0 14.0 13.9 13.3 12.5

Page 13: Configuration study

Focus Question Would a 9-10 and 11-12

configuration of our high school programs and services better serve the students in our communities?

Page 14: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 ConfigurationEnrollment Projections Chart 3A

Projected Enrollment and ADA 9-10 11-12 Configuration Chart 3AGrade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

9 121 128 143 140 118 106 125 130

10 137 118 125 140 137 115 103 122

Total Enrollment 258 246 268 280 255 221 228 252

Total ADA at 94% 242.52 231.24 251.92 263.2 239.7 207.74 214.32 236.88

Grade 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

11 147 134 115 122 137 134 112 100

12 125 145 132 113 120 135 132 110

Total Enrollment 272 279 247 235 257 269 244 210

Total ADA at 94% 255.68 262.26 232.18 220.9 241.58 252.86 229.36 197.4

Total Enrollment 530 525 515 515 512 490 472 462

Total ADA at 94% 498.2 493.5 484.1 484.1 481.28 460.6 443.68 434.28

Page 15: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 Configuration Revenue Projections Chart 4A

Current Configuration Projected Base Revenue Chart 4A

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

MSHS Enrollment 343 323 312 307 307 305 293 275

ADA @ 94% 322.42 303.62 293.28 288.58 288.58 286.7 275.42 258.5

Total Rev Limit $ 2,385,682.31 $ 2,246,575.47 $ 2,170,066.70 $ 2,135,289.99 $ 2,135,289.99 $ 2,121,379.31 $ 2,037,915.21 $ 1,912,719.05

WHS Enrollment 187 202 203 208 205 185 179 187

ADA @ 94% 175.78 189.88 190.82 195.52 192.7 173.9 168.26 175.78

NSS Funding Block $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00 $ 1,624,000.00

NSS Add-ons $ 69,877.82 $ 75,483.00 $ 75,856.67 $ 77,725.07 $ 76,604.03 $ 69,130.47 $ 66,888.40 $ 69,877.82

Total Rev Limit $ 1,693,877.82 $ 1,699,483.00 $ 1,699,856.67 $ 1,701,725.07 $ 1,700,604.03 $ 1,693,130.47 $ 1,690,888.40 $ 1,693,877.82

Total Rev Limit $ 4,079,560.13 $ 3,946,058.46 $ 3,869,923.38 $ 3,837,015.06 $ 3,835,894.03 $ 3,814,509.78 $ 3,728,803.60 $ 3,606,596.87

Page 16: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 Configuration Revenue Projections Chart 5A

9-10 11-12 Configuration with Two NSS Base Revenue Projections Chart 5A 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

9-10 Enrollment 258 246 268 280 255 221 228 252

ADA @ 94% 242.52 231.24 251.92 263.2 239.7 207.74 214.32 236.88

9-10 NSS Funding Block Rev. $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00

11-12 Enrollment 272 279 247 235 257 269 244 210

ADA @ 94% 255.68 262.26 232.18 220.9 241.58 252.86 229.36 197.4

11-12 NSS Funding Block Rev. $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00

NSS: Total $ 3,585,350.00 $ 3,585,350.00 $ 3,585,350.00 $ 3,585,350.00 $ 3,472,900.00 $ 3,585,350.00 $ 3,472,900.00 $ 3,472,900.00

NSS: add-ons $ 198,049.45 $ 196,181.06 $ 192,444.27 $ 192,444.27 $ 191,323.24 $ 183,102.32 $ 176,376.11 $ 172,639.33

NSS: Total Rev Limit $ 3,783,399.45 $ 3,781,531.06 $ 3,777,794.27 $ 3,777,794.27 $ 3,664,223.24 $ 3,768,452.32 $ 3,649,276.11 $ 3,645,539.33

Page 17: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 Configuration Revenue Projections Chart 6A

9-10 11-12 Configuration one NSS/one ADA Base Revenue Projections Chart 6A

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

9-10 Enrollment 258 246 268 280 255 221 228 252

9-10 ADA @ 94% 242.52 231.24 251.92 263.2 239.7 207.74 214.32 236.88

Total ADA Rev Limit $ 1,794,478.24 $ 1,711,014.13 $ 1,864,031.66 $ 1,947,495.76 $ 1,773,612.21 $ 1,537,130.58 $ 1,585,817.98 $ 1,752,746.18

11-12 Enrollment 272 279 247 235 257 269 244 210

11-12 ADA @ 94% 255.68 262.26 232.18 220.9 241.58 252.86 229.36 197.4

NSS Funding Block Rev $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,848,900.00 $ 1,736,450.00 $ 1,624,000.00

NSS Add-ons $ 108,128.16 $ 110,910.87 $ 98,189.91 $ 93,419.55 $ 102,165.21 $ 106,935.57 $ 96,997.32 $ 83,481.30

Total NSS Rev Limit $ 1,957,028.16 $ 1,959,810.87 $ 1,834,639.91 $ 1,829,869.55 $ 1,838,615.21 $ 1,955,835.57 $ 1,833,447.32 $ 1,707,481.30

Total Rev Limit $ 3,751,506.40 $ 3,670,825.00 $ 3,698,671.57 $ 3,777,365.31 $ 3,612,227.42 $ 3,492,966.15 $ 3,419,265.30 $ 3,460,227.48

Page 18: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 Configuration Revenue Projections Chart 7A

9-10 11-12 Configuration All ADA Base Revenue Projections ($7,399.00 per ADA) Chart 7A

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

9-12 Enrollment 530 525 515 515 512 490 472 462

9-12 ADA @ 94% 498.2 493.5 484.1 484.1 481.28 460.6 443.68 434.28

Total ADA Rev Limit $ 3,686,331.26 $ 3,651,554.55 $ 3,582,001.13 $ 3,582,001.13 $ 3,561,135.10 $ 3,408,117.58 $ 3,282,921.42 $ 3,213,368.00

Page 19: Configuration study

9-10 11-12 Configuration Revenue Projections - Comparison

Comparison Base Revenue Projections Chart 8A

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19

Current Configuration $ 4,079,560.13 $ 3,946,058.46 $ 3,869,923.38 $ 3,837,015.06 $ 3,835,894.03 $ 3,814,509.78 $ 3,728,803.60 $ 3,606,596.87

All ADA $ 3,686,331.26 $ 3,651,554.55 $ 3,582,001.13 $ 3,582,001.13 $ 3,561,135.10 $ 3,408,117.58 $ 3,282,921.42 $ 3,213,368.00

Difference $ (393,228.87) $ (294,503.91) $ (287,922.25) $ (255,013.93) $ (274,758.92) $ (406,392.20) $ (445,882.18) $ (393,228.87)

Two NSS $ 3,783,399.45 $ 3,781,531.06 $ 3,777,794.27 $ 3,777,794.27 $ 3,664,223.24 $ 3,768,452.32 $ 3,649,276.11 $ 3,645,539.33

Difference $ (296,160.68) $ (164,527.41) $ (92,129.11) $ (59,220.79) $ (171,670.79) $ (46,057.46) $ (79,527.49) $ 38,942.46

One NSS -One ADA $ 3,751,506.40 $ 3,670,825.00 $ 3,698,671.57 $ 3,777,365.31 $ 3,612,227.42 $ 3,492,966.15 $ 3,419,265.30 $ 3,460,227.48

Difference $ (328,053.73) $ (275,233.46) $ (171,251.81) $ (59,649.75) $ (223,666.61) $ (321,543.63) $ (309,538.31) $ (146,369.39)

Page 20: Configuration study

Additional Budget ConsiderationsTransportationAthleticsFacilities

Page 21: Configuration study

TransportationHome to school transportation

costs would increase. The following increases represent additional home to school bus runs as well as additional runs to transport students home after athletic practices.

Page 22: Configuration study

Transportation CostsChart 9ANew Configuration Costs Chart 9A

18,000 additional Home to School Miles $ (63,000.00)

9000 additional Activitiy bus Miles $ (31,500.00)

Less MSES Home to School Contract $ 8,000.00

Less School to School Transportation $ 12,000.00

Total AdditionalTtransportation Cost $ (74,500.00)

Page 23: Configuration study

AthleticsAthletic costs would decrease.

The following charts represent decreases in number of coaching staff and the miles transported to athletic contests.

Page 24: Configuration study

Athletic Costs Chart 10A

Chart 10A

Current Number of Coaches 38

New Configuration # of Coaches 26

Potential Coach Savings $ (26,520.00)

Current Number of team travel miles 9500

Annual Cost $ 33,250.00

New Configuration # of Travel miles 11000

Annual Cost $ 38,500.00

Potential travel miles cost increase $ 5,250.00

Total potential district savings $ (21,270.00)

Page 25: Configuration study

Sac Valley League (potential placement)Durham (355)Live Oak (540)Pierce (341)Trinity (424)Willows (511)

Page 26: Configuration study

Facility NeedsTo accommodate the 9-10 11-12

configuration, we would need to address the following facility needs:Weed High School Music Room $ 450,000.00

Weed High School Track Improvement $ 250,000.00

Mount Shasta High School CTE Renovation $ 350,000.00 *

Weed High School Art room Renovation $ 75,000.00

Total $ 1,125,000.00

* Item currently budgeted with Measure Q

Page 27: Configuration study

Financial and Structural SummaryProjections indicate a potential

loss of general revenue Other revenue sources remain

the sameTransportation potential

additional costs totaling $74,500 Athletics budget savings of

$21,270Potential new facility needs

totaling $775,000

Page 28: Configuration study

Program PotentialA 9-10 11-12 configuration may

allow us to maintain or increase the current levels of program offerings because: ◦We maintain a school of between

530 and 460 students◦Focused grade levels ◦Less duplication of program◦Larger pool of students to draw from

for specialized programs

Page 29: Configuration study

Program FocusAlthough each of the schools would

average approximately 240 to 260 students, the programs would be focused on the needs of the 9-10 or 11-12 grade student.

This may allow for a greater variety or selection of programs at each of the schools.

Each school may be able to maintain rich academic and elective choices for all students

Page 30: Configuration study

Staffing and Program PotentialSee Staffing and Program Charts

◦9-10◦11-12

Comparisons Chart 11C

Number of Sections Number of FTE

Total New Configuration (2011-12) 168 28.02

Total (WHS and MSHS) Current 174 29

Page 31: Configuration study

Program examples for all students:Core academic choicesAdvanced or AP program choicesAcademic support classesCareer and Technical Education

choicesVisual and Performing Arts

choicesVariety of Physical Education

optionsAthletics in all current areas

Page 32: Configuration study

9-10 Program ExamplesThe 9-10 school could offer a choice

of several core academic programs, each with a different theme of focus area. Students would be able to choose which core to be a part of.

Introductory Career and Technical Education program that would introduce students to the various vocational programs and options preparing them for future choices at the 11-12 school.

Page 33: Configuration study

11-12 School Program ExamplesCollege and Career Pathways

that allow a student to learn and gain skills around a chosen career or interest area.

Honors Core – A selection of Advanced Placement courses linked with College of the Siskiyous courses which provide students with direct college credit and experience.

Page 34: Configuration study

School Climate FocusEach school would be able to

focus on the variety of social and educational issues related to the various needs of the particular age level.

College and career guidance counseling can be focused on specific areas related to grade level needs.

Page 35: Configuration study

Pros and ConsPros

◦ All programs available for all students◦ Sustainability of current level of program offerings as

enrollment declines in the future◦ Larger pool of students to draw from for specialized

programs and athletics◦ Focused curriculum and social needs for the grade levels◦ Opportunity to develop relevant and focused curriculum

choices for students◦ Keeps a high school program in each community◦ Pulls the limited resources from each of the communities

together to focus on the needs of all students◦ Potential for the development of new traditions based on

the rich history of both communities

Page 36: Configuration study

Pros and ConsCons

◦Potential loss of base revenue◦ Increased transportation costs◦Transportation of students out of their

home community◦Less opportunity to participate in some

sports◦Loss of autonomy or identity between

communities ◦Change of traditions established at

each school community

Page 37: Configuration study

Questions to AnswerNecessary Small School StatusAre there compelling reasons to

support this conceptWhich site for 9-10 and 11-12Facility Needs Athletic LeagueNames, colors, mascots

Page 38: Configuration study

Next StepsGather inputAnswer questionsDistrict Advisory Meeting

◦January 20th 3:30 at Weed High School

Next Board Meeting◦January 12th 4:30 at McCloud High

School Set up meetings with studentsSet up meetings with staff

Page 39: Configuration study

Is there another way?How else can we sustain our

schools and programs for our students?


Recommended