Conformity and Alienation

Alienation• Change can be difficult for some people• Emile Durkheim

Anomie – condition of industrial workers without roots or norms as they struggled to survive.

• Karl Marx Alienation – proletariat (workers) or lumpenproletariat

(unemployed) could not reach their full potential because so many aspects of their lives were controlled and exploited by others Reasonably paid employment, decent housing

Alienation

• Term has broadened over time.• Anyone who does not share the major values

of society and feels like an outsider. Discrimination (ie. exclusion from society for

various factors) Dissatisfaction

Alienation

• Refers to an individual separation from a community or group of people in general

• This is also known as an anomie • Refers to a personal condition resulting in a lack

of norms • i.e. A totalitarian society would produce an

anomic individual such as Hitler • Anomic: lack of social or moral standards in an

individual or society

Alienation• Everyone has experienced alienation from society at some point

in their life. – Someone who loses their job and becomes unemployed might feel

alienation toward a society that seems to value wealth and success. – For some, alienation becomes so severe that they give up and turn to

crime or poverty. – Suicide and substance abuse can be both the result of, and an

explanation for, alienation. • But not all alienation is bad; some people may become

reformers and lobby to change an aspect of society. – Women in the 1920s and 1930s experienced significant alienation

from the prevailing social attitudes towards what was a woman’s role. – Led individuals to challenge the accepted view and become leaders in

the fight to achieve legal, financial, and political reforms to benefit women.

Isolation

• Known as a state of seclusion • i.e. a lack of contact with people – May stem from: – Bad relationships – Deliberate choice – Contagious disease – Repulsive personal habits – Mental illness – Substance abuse

Conformity

• Process whereby an individual’s attitudes, beliefs and behaviours are influenced by other people

• Could be the result of social pressure • People often conform to achieve a sense of

security in a group of people – a feeling that makes one ‘belong’

Conformity – Social Groups• When social scientists examine the topic of groups, they state that

a group is two or more people who have these four characteristics:– They interact regularly and influence each other.– They believe they have something in common.– They have an informal or formal social structure with leaders and

followers.– They have a group consensus on certain values, behaviours, and goals.

• By looking at those characteristics you can probably think of the several areas in your life where you see other people talk and influence thinking and emotions. – People who just happen to be waiting in a line at the same time would

not be considered a social group. They are a collection of people or what social scientists call an aggregate. They interact only briefly, if at all, and have little influence on one another.

Conformity• People adopt the values and ideals from their

families, friends, and other groups to which they belong.

• People also tend to adopt the values of the society in which they live.

• A great majority of people in Canadian society tend to have similar ways of thinking. Even though everyone may not agree on which political party should be in power, for example, most do believe in the fundamental freedoms of democracy.

Subjective Vilidity• Subjective Validity

– Term coined by social scientists– all people believe that their attitudes are right and proper

• Being with groups helps to strengthen the idea of subjective validity and that is why humans tend to enjoy being around like-minded people. Social scientist further argue that without subjective validity people would experience uncertainty, a feeling most people do not like.

• Have you ever had your feelings or actions validated by your peers?

Roots of Conformity• Social scientists M. Deutsch and H.B. Gerrard identified two

types of conformity. • Informational influence

– is the human desire to accept information from another, admired person who indicates that the information is valid. For example, a parent may tell a young child that smoking is bad. That child will conform to what the parent states because the child admires the parent.

• normative influence – the pressure to conform to the positive expectations of others.

For example, some young adults will take on the same job as a parent because it has always been expected that they would.

Social Change and Conformity

• Conformity has the ability to discourage social change. People tend to do the same thing the same way year after year and to resist the temptation to do things differently.

• Conformity also allows people to feel as if they fit in, and this can have serious consequences especially if it encourages people to accept practices that they know are wrong.

Conformity in Contemporary Society

• Most people conform to the standard values and norms without even realizing they are doing so

• Some degree of conformity is necessary for societies to function

• i.e. Stopping at a red light means that you are conforming to the law and the good and safety of society

Conformity and Youth

• Pre-teens and teenagers face many issues related to conformity

• Pulled between the desire to be seen as unique individuals and desire to belong to a group where they feel accepted – i.e. wearing the latest fashion, cutting your hair

into a certain style, smoking, changing the type of music you listen to

• All of these are examples of conforming to a social norm

Key Questions

• In groups of 2-4, discuss the following questions:• What groups in society may feel socially

isolated? • Why is this? • What groups in society are forced to conform?

What would you do? Scenario 1

• You are waiting to cross the street and the light is red. A group of pedestrians start to cross the street before the green light even though there remains some risk of oncoming traffic. What do you do?

What would you do? Scenario 2

• You are looking for garbage at a concert. You find one but it is full and you see people just throwing garbage on the ground around the garbage can. What do you do?

What would you do? Scenario 3

• You have been standing in line for hours waiting to buy tickets for a concert / sports game. A group of 6 people try to ‘bud’ in line with a friend. The people waiting start yelling and objecting as there are only a specific amount of tickets. What do you do?

What would you do? Scenario 4

• A senior student approaches you and a bunch of your friends offering to sell you his / her old assignments and copy of tests for a class. All of your friends agree to this and are waiting for your decision. What do you do?

What would you do? Scenario 5

• You have just started a new job and are sitting around with your new co-workers. Someone tells a joke that is very racist and everyone is laughing and starts telling more racist jokes that you find offensive. What do you do?

What would you do? Scenario 6

• A bunch of you are at a friends for dinner—after dinner all your friends get up from the table and leave their plates as you are late for a party. You have been brought up to always clear your plate from the table and help clean up. What do you do?

Discussion

• Which situation would be the most easy and most difficult in terms of resisting conformity?

• Why?

A Long Walk Home

THE PEOPLE, THE COMMUNITY, THE MOVEMENT THAT CHANGED THE WORLD

• http://www.montgomeryboycott.com/• The Montgomery Bus Boycott – political and social protest campaign – 1955 in Montgomery, Alabama, USA– oppose the city's policy of racial segregation on its

public transit system– many important figures in the civil rights

movement were involved in the boycott, including Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.

Montgomery Bus Boycott• The boycott caused crippling financial deficit for the

Montgomery public transit system, because the city's black population who were the principal boycotters were also the bulk of the system's paying customers. The campaign lasted from December 1, 1955, when Rosa Parks, an African American woman, was arrested for refusing to surrender her seat to a white person, to December 20, 1956, when a federal ruling, Browder v. Gayle, took effect, and led to a United States Supreme Court decision that declared the Alabama and Montgomery laws requiring segregated buses to be unconstitutional.

Segregated Bus System• Under the system of segregation used on Montgomery buses, white

people who boarded the bus took seats in the front rows, filling the bus toward the back. Black people who boarded the bus took seats in the back rows, filling the bus toward the front. Eventually, the two sections would meet, and the bus would be full. If other black people boarded the bus, they were required to stand. If another white person boarded the bus, then everyone in the black row nearest the front had to get up and stand, so that a new row for white people could be created. Often when boarding the buses, black people were required to pay at the front, get off, and re-enter the bus through a separate door at the back. On some occasions bus drivers would drive away before black passengers were able to reboard.

Rosa Parks• When Rosa Parks refused on the

afternoon of Dec. 1, 1955, to give up her bus seat so that a white man could sit, it is unlikely that she fully realized the forces she had set into motion and the controversy that would soon swirl around her. Other black women had similarly refused to give up their seats on public buses and had even been arrested, including two young women earlier that same year in Montgomery, Ala. But this time the outcome was different.