Conservation of Critical habitats: The Mangroves, Coral Reefs
and Seagrass beds in Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park,
Wandoor, Andaman and Nicobar Islands.
K. Ravichandran, IFS
Conservator of Forests (Wildlife)
Department of Environment and Forests
Haddo, Port Blair
Abstract
Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park, Wandoor boasts with a unique combination of
forest and marine ecosystems in the form of dense tropical wet evergreen, moist deciduous
and littoral forests occurring on the islands, lush mangrove forest growing in the inter tidal
zone next to the dense tropical forests and the beautiful, diverse and rich fringing coral reefs
and sea grass beds, occurring in the marine environs of the park. Coral reefs, sea-grass beds,
and mangrove forests are critical resources supporting ecosystems and livelihoods in coastal
areas. This paper explores the role and current status of these resources, the exchange of
mutual benefits from and between these critical habitats and its contributions in maintaining
the rich and highly productive biodiversity. Mutual Benefits between Mangrove, Sea grass,
and Coral Reef Ecosystems
Mutual Benefits between Mangrove, Sea grass, and Coral Reef Ecosystems
Introduction
Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park (MGMNP), Wandoor, located
between11022’06 to 11
036’34”N latitude and 92
030’00” to 92
040’33”E longitude in the Bay
of Bengal, is the first Marine National Park of Andaman & Nicobar Islands (Fig. 1). Situated
in southwest coast of the South Andaman Island, the national park is an important component
of the ‘Protected Area Network’ and conserves a representative sample of Andaman and
Nicobar Island biogeographic zone. MGMNP was created with the aim to preserve certain
areas in their natural state while allowing opportunities for their appreciation and enjoyment
by the public, allow reasonable general use consistent with the objective of conservation,
provide opportunities for research, training and education about marine conservation and
ecologically sustainable development and make people understand the value and benefits of
conservation of marine biodiversity.
Fig. 1: Map showing the location of MGMNP in Andaman and Nicobar Islands
The MGMNP is spread over 281.5 km2 area situated between southwest coast of
South Andaman Island and northeast coast of Rutland Island. The park encompasses 15
Islands, viz., Jolly Bouy, Malay, Pluto, Red Skin, Boat, Snob, Chester, Grub, Hobday,
Alexandra, Tarmugli, Twins, Belle and Rifleman and some unnamed rocky outcrops. The
total land area of MGMNP is approximately 61.5 km², which includes 59.77 km² of the land
area of 15 islands mentioned above and 1.73 sq km of rocky outcrops and the remaining 220
km² area consists of mangrove lined creeks, shallow reef areas and open sea (Fig.2).
There are shallow sheltered creeks in the northwest portion of the Park, while eastern
and southern parts consist of moderately deep open sea. The normal depth range is up to 30
metres, while at places it goes down up to 50 metres. McPherson Strait passes through the
central portion of the Park, connecting the Bay of Bengal with the Andaman Sea, between
South Andaman and Rutland islands.
It represents a unique combination of forest and marine ecosystems in the form of
dense tropical wet evergreen, moist deciduous and littoral forests occurring on the islands,
lush mangrove forest growing in the inter tidal zone next to the dense tropical forests and the
beautiful, diverse and rich fringing coral reefs and sea grass beds, occurring in the marine
environs of the park. The large terrestrial mammals are not represented here due to the long
geographic isolation of these islands, but the birds, reptiles, fishes and other lower animals
such as insects, butterflies, many of which are endemic, along with plant and marine
biodiversity, is very well represented in the MGMNP and is unparalleled in the country
(Ravichandran,2006). The critical habitats like mangroves, coral reefs, seagrass beds, beaches
contributes to the species diversity of the Park, is richest amongst all marine national parks in
the country.
Mangroves
Mangroves are characterized by one or more species of salt-tolerant trees, or
halophytes that form distinct monospecific zones along tropical protected coastlines (Ellison
and Farnsworth, 1993). They occur in a wide range of geo-morphological settings ranging
from the vast riverine and estuarine mangrove forests of Southeast Asia to isolated cays that
have developed atop carbonate sands and coral rubble along the coasts of the Caribbean,
Micronesia, and the Andamans (Ellison, 2000).
Fig.2: Map Showing the boundary limits of MGMNP
Mangroves are trees or shrubs that have the common trait of growing in shallow and
muddy salt water or brackish waters, especially along quiet shorelines and in estuaries. In
another way, mangroves are the tidal forests of coast wetlands, existing in the inter-tidal
zones of sheltered shores, estuaries, tidal creeks, backwaters, lagoons, marshes and mud-flats
of the tropical and sub-tropical regions of the world. The word ‘Mangroves’ is used to refer
to the plants and also to the forest community. These ecosystems are also otherwise called as
tidal forests, oceanic rain forests or coastal woodlands (Duke, 1992).
Mangrove ecosystem harbours a diversity of organisms which in some way or the
other directly depend on this ecosystem (Macnae, 1968). Leaf litter decomposition within the
ecosystem provides an important nutrient base for food-webs leading to commercially
important food fishes and invertebrates. For example, the commercially important prawns
(Penaeus monodon, P. indicus), fishes like snapper, grouper, milk fish (Chanos chanos) etc.
dwell in the mangrove water for their breeding. The mangrove root systems provide a safe
place to hide or to escape from predators and thus act as nurseries of juvenile fish stocks
(Kathiresan, 1995).
Mangrove forest ecosystems fulfil a number of important functions and provide a
wide range of services. They are among some of the most productive and biologically
important ecosystems of the world because they provide important and unique ecosystem
goods and services to human society and coastal and marine systems (FAO 2007). The
forests help stabilize shorelines and reduce the devastating impact of natural disasters such as
tsunamis and hurricanes. They also provide breeding and nursing grounds for marine and
pelagic species, and food, medicine, fuel and building materials for local communities (Giri
et al., 2010). Mangroves, including associated soils, could sequester approximately 22.8
million metric tons of carbon each year. Covering only 0.1% of the earth’s continental
surface, the forests account for 11% of the total input of terrestrial carbon into the ocean
(Jennerjahn & Ittekot, 2002) and 10% of the terrestrial dissolved organic carbon (DOC)
exported to the ocean (Dittmar et al., 2006). The rapid disappearance and degradation of
mangroves could have negative consequences for transfer of materials into the marine
systems and influence the atmospheric composition and climate.
Mangroves support the conservation of biological diversity by providing habitats,
spawning grounds, nurseries and nutrients for a number of animals. These include several
endangered species and range from reptiles (e.g. crocodiles, iguanas and snakes) and
amphibians to mammals (tigers – including the famous Panthera tigris tigris, the Royal
Bengal tiger – deer, otters, manatees and dolphins) and birds (herons, egrets, pelicans and
eagles). A wide range of commercial and non-commercial fish and shellfish also depends on
these coastal forests. Mangrove organic productivity (Odum and Heald, 1972) has been
suggested to support near shore fisheries production (Lee, 1999). Mangrove ecosystems are
also used for aquaculture, both as open-water estuarine mariculture (e.g. oysters and mussels)
and as pond culture (mainly for shrimps).
They harbour a large number of animal species, which are partially or totally
dependent on mangrove ecosystems. According to Gopal and Krishnamurthy (1993), more
than 500 species of insects and Arachinds, 229 species of crustaceans, 212 species of
Molluscs, 50 species of nematodes, 33 species of polycheates (Sunil Kumar, 2000), 150
species of planktonic and benthic organisms are known from Indian mangroves. About 300
species of fishes, 177 species of birds, 36 species of mammals are also reported from Indian
mangroves.
According to Tomlinson (1986), the major mangroves include 34 species in 9 genera
and 5 families. The minor species contribute 20 species in 11 genera and 11 families. Thus a
total of 54 mangrove species in 20 genera and 16 families are present globally. Duke (1992),
on the other hand, identified 69 mangrove species belonging to 26 genera in 20 families. The
species distribution in coastal wetlands is non random and striated. While species such as
Rhizhophora and Ceriops occupy the shore line with higher salinity the various Bruguiera
taxa occur in the inland. Thus there are more or less well striated distinct zones, each
dominated by a different mangrove species (Rey, 1999). Although tides and successful
seedling establishment play an important part in creating these zones, predation of certain
propagules by crustaceans such as crabs, can also influence which species creates a certain
zone. Grapsid crabs play considerable role in the predation of mangrove propagules that may
be a threat to natural or artificial mangrove restorations (Dahdouh-Guebas, et al., 1998).
The taxa Rhizophoraceae is truly viviparous, where the growing embryo remains
attached to the parent and germinates into a seedling before falling from the tree (Rey, 1999).
Habitat loss and fragmentation are seen as two of the major extinction vortices to terrestrial
productivity and biodiversity (Soule, 1991). Mangroves are under threat throughout the
tropical distribution, primarily through deforestation and clearing to accommodate
aquaculture or establish harbour facilities, or infilling for land-based developments (Hatcher
et al., 1989). Mangroves have been reduced between 20 - 75% in many tropical countries in
Asia and the Caribbean. A figure of 1% decline per year has been given as a conservative
estimate for the Asia-Pacific region (Ong, 1995).
Mangroves in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands are estimated to occupy an area of
617 Sq. km, mostly in the Andaman group of islands (FSI, 2011). Rhizophora mucronata
and R. apiculata occur in the outer zone. Bruguiera gymnorrihiza and Ceriops tagal as well
Avicennia and Lumnitzera form the middle zone. Some shrubs such as Acanthus ilicifolius,
fern Acrostichium aureum as well as Phoenix palustris, a palm species, occur in the
innermost zone where the tidal influence is less and salinity is low.
A study revealed that 38 species of mangroves belonging to 21 genera and 18 families
are found in A&N Islands (Mall et al., 1985). Dagar and Sharma (1989) have classified the
mangrove types into 19 communities and associations on the basis of structure and species
composition. A total of 34 exclusive mangrove species were recorded in A&N Islands (Dagar
et al., 1991) and recently Debnath (2004) reported 58 species from A&N Islands.
The MGMNP is having considerable area under healthy and intact mangroves (Fig.1)
having 13 species, Rhizophora being the dominant one. In some islands such as South-eastern
part of Malay island, South western part of Hobday Island, Northern tip of Rutland Island,
Eastern part of Alexandra Island and near Manjeri village mangrove growth is patchy and
degraded.
Loss of Mangroves
In the marine environment, problems of habitat degradation have so far primarily
affected vegetated estuarine and coastal habitats, including wetlands, salt marshes, seagrass
beds, kelp forests and mangroves. (Hatcher et al., 1989; Suchanek, 1994; Zann, 1995).
Studies on Post-Tsunami Changes in the distribution of mangroves and other land cover
categories in South Andaman have indicated that there is a reduction in area of Mangrove
swamps, Agriculture and settlement. However, there is an increase in area under tidal
creek/water mass in south Andaman. Whereas, 22% of the mangroves are heavily damaged,
23% least damaged and 15 % moderately damaged. Only 40 % of the mangroves remains
intact in the South Andamans (Chatterjee, et al., 2008). The giant fern Acrostichum aureum
and the aquatic sedge Fimbrisstylis littoralis and true mangroves namely Rhizophora spp,
Bruguiera spp, Avicennia spp, Sonneratia spp, etc. have got affected in various degrees based
on their physiological responses to the continuous inundation/exposure under the changed
scenario. In the South Andamans, in few localities 30–80% of mangrove stands have got
affected. In the Middle Andaman the impact is negligible, whereas in the North Andaman due
to the elevation of land, the sea water is not reaching some of the mangrove stands (Dam Roy
and Krishnan, 2005).
Restoration of Mangroves:
Restoration is defined as the return from a disturbed or totally altered condition to a
previously existing natural or altered condition by some human action (Lewis, 1990).
Restoring an ecosystem to exactly the same condition that it was in itself is unrealistic
(Simberloff, 1990). However, an approximation of the original system may be possible and
sufficient (Lewis, 1990; Henry & Amoros, 1995), given that ecosystems may be essentially
non-equilibrium in nature (Wyant et al., 1995). Restoration attempts have been made in
major habitat types of marine ecosystems, but mostly in salt marshes, sea grasses and coral
reefs (Race, 1985; Moy & Levin, 1991; Clark & Edwards, 1995). Among different forest
ecosystems in the tropics mangroves have received relatively little attention. It has been
reported that growing mangroves to a young tree stage leads to greater success by allowing
plants to bypass a disease vulnerable stage (Hannan, 1975; Thorhaug, 1990).
Mangrove ecosystems are often cited as being responsive to differences in soil
salinity, frequency of tidal inundation, sedimentation, soil chemistry, freshwater influx and
groundwater availability. This is said to have led to significant variations noted in mangrove
community structure and function even within small geographic ranges. Mangroves may be
one of the easiest marine systems to restore because of the apparent plasticity of assemblages,
viviparous reproduction and the observation that these seedlings often have the best survival
and growth rates (Rabinowitz, 1978).
In restoration efforts on mangroves care should be taken to propagule from predation
by using certain methods viz., saturation of crabs with a large number of propagules, vertical
planting of propagules, planting a mixture of species, and planting mature propagules. In
addition, crab exclusion is another method that may be helpful. Restoration of mangroves in
MGMNP impacted due to Tsunami is on the restoration efforts have resulted in recovery of
mangroves in the park area.
Corals
A coral reef ranks among the most biologically productive and diverse of all-natural
ecosystems. Coral reefs play an important role in global biochemical processes and in the
reproduction of food resources in the tropical regions. They act as a barrier against wave
action along coastal areas thus preventing coastal erosion. In addition, coral reefs protect
mangroves and seagrass beds in certain areas, which are the breeding and nursing grounds of
various economically important fauna. Coral reefs are also important breeding, spawning,
nesting, and feeding areas for many economically important varieties of fishes and other
marine organisms. The people living along the coast obtain a considerable proportion of their
food and earnings from the productivity of coral reefs. Coral reef ecosystems are very
sensitive to external impacts both natural and manmade (Sorokin 1993). The majority of
damage to coral reefs around the world has been through direct anthropogenic stress (Grigg
and Dollar 1990). According to Bryant et al.,(1998) 57% of the world’s coral reefs are
potentially threatened by human activity such as coastal development, destructive fishing,
over exploitation, marine pollution, runoff from deforestation and toxic discharge from
industrial and agricultural chemicals.
The MGMNP possesses some outstanding coral reef areas of very high diversity.
Department of Ocean Development and the Space Application Centre, Ahmadabad (SAC)
(1997) reported narrow, linear and extensively well developed fringing reefs, and classified
the reefs of the Islands as fringing reefs found in Rutland, Jolly Bouy, Tarmugli, Boat, and
Redskin Islands and as coral pinnacles found in Twin, Chester, Snob and Malay Islands
(Fig.3)..
The reef flat is generally broader on the west and narrower on the eastern side.
Broader reef flats are present in Tarmugli, Boat, Snob and Jolly Buoy Islands. The coral
reefs are complete with wide and extensive reef flat, coralline shelf and coral heads which are
an indication of continuing coral growth activity and are found in Tarmugli, Boat, Chester,
Redskin and Alexandra Islands. The type and category of reefs and associated features such
Fig.3: Map Showing the Mangroves and Coral Reef Areas of MGMNP
Source: Space Application Centre, Ahmadabad
as reef flats, sand on reef, mud over reef, reef vegetation, coralline shelf and coral heads of
the Islands in MGMNP have been mapped on 1: 50,000 scale using IRS, LISS II, LANDSAT
TM and SPOT MLA (Bahuguna and Nayak, 1998).
Arjan Rajasuriya, et al., (2002) reported that there were 203 coral species in Andaman
and Nicobar Islands and reported that the bleaching event had less impact in the Islands
compared with the other coral reef areas in India and reported 56% live coral cover, 20%
dead coral cover and 11% coral rubble.
Turner et al., (2001) have recorded high coral diversity for the MGMNP and have
reported 42-88 coral species around five Islands in this Park. They have also reported that
Andaman reefs consist of about 83% maximum coral diversity found anywhere in the world
and is equal to the “Coral Triangle” off Indonesia
Kulkarni (2001) recorded 122 species of corals, representing 55 genera of
scleractinian corals in MGMNP. Four species of non-scleractinian reef-building corals
including Tubipora musica, Heliopora coerulea and two Millepora species are also found
here. Among the corals recorded, 8 genera (Anacropora, Lithophyllon, Zoopilus,
Echinophyllia, Oxypora, Acanthastrea, Mussa and Cynarina), and 60 species of scleractinian
corals are new records for the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Most of the species
assignments correspond to those by Veron and Pichon (1976,1980 and 1982), Veron et al.,
(1977), Veron and Wallace (1984) and Veron (2000).
Factors affecting Reef Development
Coral reef development is reduced or eliminated in areas of high turbidity. When
sediment is carried by streams and run off from elevated areas, the combination of reduced
salinity and excess sediment results in the mortality of coral reefs. Sedimentation is a major
factor controlling the distribution of reef organisms and overall reef development (McIntyre
1988). The reduced level of light due to suspended sediment in the water can reduce coral
growth (Hubbard et al., 1986) and has an impact on natural zonation patterns (Morelock et
al., 1983). Coral Larvae cannot successfully establish themselves in shifting sediments.
Increases in sediment input could alter the distributions of reef organisms, by influencing the
ability of their larvae to settle and survive (Rogers 1990). Tomascik and Sander (1987)
suggest that lower light levels may inhibit development of coral larvae by reducing the
amount of energy available to maturing ova or embryos.
Acanthaster planci
The “crown of thorns” starfish Acanthaster planci is a large specialised corrallivore
echinoderm, which feeds exclusively on scleractinian corals. Massive infestations of crown of
thorns were first recorded in 1989 in MGMNP (Wood, 1989), resulting in its
catastrophic degradation. The subsequent recovery might take 10-40 years, depending on the
degree of damage and on not being attacked repeatedly. The attacks by this starfish on reefs
could be considered as an ecocatastrophe on a large scale, triggered mainly by human activity,
considered a major disturbance. The Acanthaster planci have very flexible motile spiny rays.
By their use, they are able to crawl easily upon colonies of the corals and hold onto them.
Coral disease
The exposure of corals to disease had been first discovered in MGMNP in 1991.
Raghukumar and Raghukumar (1991) described two kinds of diseases “white band” and
“black band” which could be considered as an indication of stressed environment. Kulkarni
et.al (2004) reported that corals from deeper water of Alexandra, Red Skin and Jolly Bouy
showed symptoms of disease. He also observed the outbreaks of these diseases on reefs where
corals had been destroyed by cyclones, and then bored by sponges and clams. Under the
influence of siltation and pollution in zones of such an activity, the coral increase their
excretion of mucus, the excess of which stimulates the development of bacteria, which then
infect the corals themselves (Rogers, 1990).
Threats due to Anthropogenic Pressure
Hunting, shell, coral and sea cucumber collection, fishing, sand mining, removal of
NTFP are major illegal activities reported in MGMNP area.
Fishing
Fishing by dinghi with hook and cast net is done by local people residing in fringing
villages of MGMNP. The threat mainly due to the fishing is coral damage by anchoring and
depletion of resources, due to illegal fishing. In South - East Asia, there is great demand for
shark fins for soup and medicinal value. Due to the high commercial value in the market,
local fishermen are attracted to hunting of sharks, which again affects the park.
Shell/coral collection
Shell collection is permitted in areas other than national park and sanctuaries to
license holders in Andaman and Nicobar Islands and is regulated by Directorate of Fisheries.
Due to its commercial value and easy availability and accessiblity, shell collection is one of
the major illegal activities within MGMNP. Plucking corals or shells goes on for three to four
months in a year, during the dry period. For most of the newly immigrant population, in the
absence of any land or property, diving provides the simplest and most attractive income
opportunity. The abundant mollusc such as Trochus, cowries, conch, murex, cone, volutes,
chank and ark, are mainly removed. Collection and sale of corals is new banned in these
islands. Also the Molluscs such as Cassis cornuta, Charonia tritonis, Conus milneedwardsi,
Cypraecassis rufa, Hippopus hippopus, Nautilus pompilius, Tridacna maxima, Tridacna
squamosa and Tudicla spirillus have been brought under Schedule I and other molluscs such
as Cypraea lamacina, Cypraea mappa, Cypraea talpa, Fasciolaria trapezium, Harpulina
arausica, Lambis Chiragra, Lambis chiragraathitica, Lambis crocea, Lambis millipede,
Lambis scorpius, Lambis truncate, Placenta placenta, Strombus plicatus sibbaldi, Trochus
niloticus and Turbo marmopratus under schedule IV of Wildlife (Protection) Act,1972 and
accorded protection. The collection of the above species is totally banned. However, sale of
the shell items under Schedule IV is permitted under licence by the Chief Wildlife Warden
till such time the existing stock is liquidated (Ravichandran, 2006).
Sea cucumber collection
The sea cucumber (beche de mer) has very high commercial value in South East
Asian countries. These sluggish animals play a very important role in removing algae and
preventing stratification of bottom and also preventing algal attack on corals. These sea
cucumber resources are facing serious threats from foreign as well as local poachers in
MGMNP. The important species are Holothuria nobilis, H. scabra, H. atra, and Actinopyga
echinites.
Due to high fishery returns, reef areas in MGMNP always attract fishermen and shell
& sea cucumber collectors. The people have complaints about restrictions on fishing and
shell collecting within the park. This fishing and poaching activity creates imbalance in the
ecosystem and damages the resources particularly the coral reefs. Protection machinery has
been geared up in the park territory which have minimised the illegal activities.
Sea Grass Beds:
Seagrass bed is an ecosystem often occurs alongside coral reefs. Although they are
much less charismatic and frequently overlooked, seagrass beds play a vital role in
maintaining the health and diversity of adjacent coral reefs. Seagrasses are not one but 50
species of flowering marine plant which usually form dense stands in the shallow, sandy
bottom environments of back reef lagoons and semi-enclosed bays. They are bright sunlit
fields of waving green fronds and are the favoured habitat of the globally endangered green
turtle (Caretta caretta) and queen conch (Strombus gigas). Other common inhabitants are
cushion stars, urchins and sea cucumbers (Rey, 1999).
One of the most remarkable things about seagrasses is their ability to spread and grow
by sending out underground rhizomes (roots). It is also their greatest weakness as it makes
them phenomenally vulnerable to trampling and physical damage. Seagrasses trap sediment
and bind soil thereby preserving water quality and protecting coastal environments.
Similar to mangroves systems, seagrass beds provide an ideal hiding place for the
young of many species of reef fish and other marine life. They trap substantial quantities of
organic and inorganic sediments that support an enormous array of reef flora and fauna and
serves as a nursery ground for many reef fishes. Sea grass beds are also an extremely
important food source for dugongs and sea turtles. Studies have suggested that there is a
correlation between the sea grass and dugongs abundance (Das, 1996).
Sea-grasses play an important role by maintaining the richness of coastal
environment. The large areas of shallow calcareous sand of MGMNP provide a suitable
substrate for sea grass growth. Here sea grasses occur from inter tidal region to up to 13m
depth. The dense intertwined rhizomes and roots of the sea grasses form a strong mat that
penetrates the substrate and secures the plant against the water and wave motion, thereby
stabilising the bottom sediments. Five species namely Halophilia ovata, Halodule pinifolia
Thalassia hemprichii, Cymodocea serrulata and Enhalus acoroides have so far been recorded
from MGMNP.
Impacts to Sea grasses
Over the years losses of seagrasses have been severe, with some areas losing up to
95 percent of their coverage. Other areas, however, have remained stable and productive.
Reduced light transmittance through the water column has been one of the major factors
implicated in losses of seagrass coverage. Seagrass loss due to light attenuation usually
starts at the outer (deeper) edge of the beds, where the light reaching the plants is only
marginal, and progresses towards the shallower regions as conditions deteriorate. Several
factors are important in reducing light penetrating to a given depth of the water column:
Absorption by phytoplankton and macroalgae, Suspended particle load and colour due to
dissolved organic materials (Rey, 1999).
Phytoplankton and algal blooms are often caused by increased nutrient loads from
sewage discharges and from agricultural and residential fertilizers, which run off into the
lagoon. Increased nutrient levels also cause an increase in the density of epiphytes
(organisms that attach to the seagrass blades and block light). Suspended particles are
introduced into the water column via runoff from commercial, agricultural, and residential
areas, and also from activities within the estuary such as dredging and sediment re-
suspension caused by boat propellers. Dissolved organic material has many sources,
including residential and commercial pesticides and fertilizers, marsh vegetation, and
others.
Conclusion
Conservation of the natural and cultural resources and their ecological relationshipare
the primary objectives of management of Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park. The
dynamic ecological processes must be kept going in the same way as they have been going on
since time immemorial, not influenced by man. This can only be achieved through strict
protection to avoid any disturbances to the critical habitats like mangroves, coral reefs,
seagrass beds and sandy beaches. Involvement of local communities is paramount to accord
complete protection to the critical habitats which are breeding and feeding grounds of rare
and endangered species of fauna and flora and to gradually eliminate the destructive factors
adversely affecting the system, if any. Promotion of eco-tourism involving local communities
is required to create awareness on the need for conservation and management of the marine
ecosystem on scientific lines, and for proper socio-economic development based on the
principles of sustainability. Economic development which is ecologically and culturally
sustainable has to be promoted through eco-development programmes in villages adjoining
the MGMNP and promotion of uses compatible with conservation and sustainable
development by involving the local communities so as to conserve the unique resources of
the MGMNP for posterity.
References:
Bahuguna, A. and Nayak, S. 1998. Coral reefs of Indian Coast.Scientific Note, Space
Applications Centre, Ahmedabad. SAC/RSA/RSAG/DOD-COS/SN/16/98, 56 p.
Bryant, Dirk, Lauretta Burke, John McManus and Mark Spaulding. 1998. Reefs at Risk: A
Map-Based Indicator of Threats to the World's Coral
Reefs. WRI/ICLARM/WCMC/UNEP. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.,
1998& 56 p. Web version: http://www.wri.org/wri/indictrs/reefrisk.htm
Chatterjee, B., Porwal, M.C. and Hussain,Y.A. (2008). Assessment of Tsunami damage to
mangrove in India using Remote Sensing and GIS. Int. Arch Photogramm Remote
Sens Spatial Inform Sci 37 (part B):8
Clark, S. and Edwards, A.J. (1995). Coral transplantation as an aid to reef rehabilitation:
evaluation of a case study in the Maldives. Coral Reefs 14, 201-213.
Dam Roy, S. and P. Krishnan.(2005). Mangrove stands of Andamans vis-à-vis tsunami.
Current Science 89(11): 1800-1804.
Dagar, J. C. and Sharma, A. K.(1989) Impact of developmental activities on litterfall and
mangal formation in the Andamans. Paper presented in Sym. Dev. Vis - a vis Ecology
INTACH Forest Deptt. PBL.
Dagar JC, Mongia AD, Bandhopadhyay AK. 1991. Mangroves of Andaman & Nicobar
Islands. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, Mumbai and Kolkata.
Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Verneirt, M., Tack, J.F., Van Speybroeck, D., and N. Koedam. (1998).
Propagule predators in Kenyan mangroves and their possible effect on regeneration.
Marine Freshwater Research 49: 345-350.
Das, H. S. 1996. Status of seagrass habitats of the Andaman and Nicobar coast. SACON
Technical Report No. 4, 32pp.
Debnath, H. S. (2004). Mangroves of Andaman and Nicobar Islands: Taxonomy and Ecology
(A communityProfile). Pub. Bhisan Singh and Mahendra Pal Singh, New Delhi.
DOD, SAC .1997. Coral Reef Maps of India. Department of Ocean Development and Space
Application Centre, Ahmedabad, India.
Dittmar, T., Hertkorn, N., Kattner, G. & Lara, R.J. (2006) Mangroves, a major source of
dissolved organic carbon to the oceans. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 20, 1,
GB101210, doi: 10.1029/2005GB002570
Duke, N.C. 1992. Mangrove floristics and biogeography, Chapter 4 (p63-100) in: Tropical
Mangrove Ecosystems (Volume 41), A.I. Robertson and D.M. Alongi, (Eds.), Coastal
and Estuarine Studies Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., 329
pp.
Ellison, A. M. (2000). Mangrove restoration: do we know enough? Restoration Ecology 8(3):
219-229.
Ellison, A.M. and E.J. Farnsworth. (1993). Seedling survivorship, growth, and response to
disturbance in Belizean mangal. American Journal of Botany 80(10): 1137-1145.
FAO (2007). The world’s mangroves 1980–2005. FAO Forestry Paper 153. FAO, Rome
FSI (2011). India State of Forest Report 2011. Forest Survey of India, Ministry of
Environment and Forests, Government of India, pp.35-39.
Giri, C., Ochieng. E., Tieszen L.L.,Zhu Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T. Masek, J. and. Duke, N.
(2010). Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth
observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20, 154-159.
Gopal B and Krishnamurthy K. (1993). Wetlands of South Asia. In Wetlands of the world 1:
Inventory, ecology and management, eds DF Whigham, D Dykyjova & S Hejny,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, 345–414.
Grigg, R.W. and Dollar S.J.(1990). Natural and anthropogenic disturbance on coral reef
ecology. In: Dubinsky Z. (Eds.), Ecosystems of the world 25, Coral reefs. Elsevier,
Amsterdam, pp. 439-452
Hannan, J. (1975). Aspects of red mangrove reforestation in Florida. Proceedings of the
Second Annual Conference on the Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida, pp.
112-121.
Hatcher, B. G., Johannes, R.E. and Robertson, A.I. (1989). Review of research relevant to the
conservation of shallow tropical marine ecosystems. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann.
Rev.27, 337-414.
Henry, C. P. and Amoros, C. (1995). Restoration ecology of riverine wetlands: I. A scientific
base. Environmental Management 19, 891-902.
http://fmel.ifas.ufl.edu/online/mangroves.htm
Hatcher, B. G., Johannes, R.E. &. Robertson, A.I. (1989). Review of research relevant to the
conservation of shallow tropical marine ecosystems. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev.
27, 337-414.
Hubbard, D. K., Burke, R. B. and Gill, I. P. 1986. Styles of reef accretion along a steep, shelf-
edge reef, St. Croix, U. S. Virgin Islands. J. Sedim. Petrol. 56: 848-861.
Jennerjahn, T.C. and Ittekot, V. (2002) Relevance of mangroves for the production and
deposition of organic matter along tropical continental margins. Naturwissenschaften,
89, 23–30.
Kathiresan, K. 1995. Rhizophora annamalayana: A new species of mangrove.
Environment and Ecology 13 (1): 240-241.
Kulkarni S. 2000. Ecological assessment of coral reefs in Mahatma Gandhi Marine National
Park, Wandoor, Andaman & Nicobar Islands; Conservation Implications. Wildlife
Institute of India, Dehradun, India.
Kulkarni, S. 2001. The status of coral reefs in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Department of
Environment and Forests, Andaman and Nicobar Administration.
Kulkarni S., Saxena A., Choudhury B.C., and Sawarkar V.B. 2001. Ecological Assessment of
Coral Reefs in MGMNP, Wandoor, A&N Islands: Conservation implications.
Kulkarni, S., Saxena A., Choudhury B.C., Kakr, M.D. and Jagdale R. 2004. Dynamics of
coral reef in Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park, Andaman Islands: Conservation
implications. Report submitted to MoEF and A&N. Dept of E & F. Wildlife Institute
of India, Dehradun, India.
Lee, S. Y. (1999). Tropical mangrove ecology: physical and biotic factors influencing
ecosystem structure and function. Australian Journal of Ecology 24:355-366.
Lewis, R. R. (1990). Wetlands restoration/creation/enhancement terminology: Suggestions
for standardisation. In Wetland Creation and Restoration: The status of the science
ed.
Macintyre, I. G. 1988. Modern coral reefs of western Atlantic: new geological perspective.
Am. Ass. Petro. Geol. Bull., 72: 1360-1369
Macnae, W. (1968). A general account of a fauna and flora of mangrove swamps and forest
in the Indo‐Pacific region. Advances in Marine Biology, 6 : 73‐270.
Mall, L.P., V.P., Singh, A. Garge and S.M.Pathak, 1985. A new approach towards the
mangrove forests flora of Andaman Islands. Indian Forester, Vol.111, No.5, May
1985
Morelock, J., Grove, K. and Hernandez, M. 1983. Oceanography and patterns of shelf
sediments, Mayaguez, Puerto Rico. J. Sedim. Petrol. 53: 371-381.
Moy, L.D. and Levin, L.A. (1991) Are Spartina marshes a replaceable resource? A functional
approach to evaluation of marsh creation efforts. Estuaries 14, 1-16
Odum, W. E., Heald, E. J. (1972). Trophic analysis of an estuarine mangrove community.
Bulletin of Marine Science 22:671-738.
Ong, J-E. (1995). The ecology of mangrove conservation and management. Hydrobiologia
295, 343-351.
Race, M.S. (1985). Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based
on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco Bay. Environ.Manag. 9,
71-82.
Rabinowitz, D. (1978). Early growth of mangrove seedlings in Panama, and hypothesis
concerning the relationship of dispersal and zonation. J. Biogeog. 5, 113-133.
Raghukumar, L. and Raghukumar, S. 1991. Fungal invasion of massive coral. Mar. Ecol.
12(3): 251-260.
Rajasuriya, A., Venkataraman, K., Muley, E. V., Zahir, H., & Cattermoul, B., (2002) “Status
of Coral Reefs in South Asia: Bangladesh, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka”. In: Wilkinson,
C., (ed.) Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2002. Australian Institute of Marine
Science, Townsville, pp. 101-121.
Ravichandran, K.2006. Mahatma Gandhi Marine National Park, Wandoor Port Blair,
Management Plan 2006-2016. Department of Environment and Forests, Andman and
Nicobar Islands.
Rey, J.R. 1999. Accessed 10/12/03. Florida Medical Entomology On-line Publications
#IRL1003 University of Florida, IFAS.
Rogers, C. S. 1990. Responses of coral reefs and reefs organisms to sedimentation. Mar.
Ecol. Prog. Ser., 62: 185-202
Simberloff, D. (1990). Reconstructing the ambiguous: Can island ecosystems be restored? In
Ecological restoration of New Zealand islands, ed. D.R. Towns, C. H. Daugherty &
I.A. E. Atkinson, Conservation Sciences Publication No. 2, Department of
Conservation,Wellington, pp. 37-51.
Sorokin, Y. I. 1993. Coral Reef Ecology, 465 pp. Springer-Verlag, Germany
Soule, M. E. (1991). Conservation: tactics for a constant crisis. Science 253, 744-750.
Suchanek, T. H. (1994). Temperate coastal marine communities: biodiversity and
threats.Amer. Zool. 34, 100-114.
Sunilkumar, R. 2000. A review of biodiversity studies of soil dwelling organisms in Indian
mangroves. Zoos Print 15(3): 221-227.
The Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Wildlife Trust of India, New Delhi. Nataraj Publishers,
Dehradun 2003.
Thorhaug, A. (1990). Restoration of mangroves and seagrasses - economic benefits for
fisheries and mariculture. In. Environmental Restoration: Science and strategies for
restoring the Earth ed. J.J. Berger, Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA, pp. 265-
281.
Tomascik, T. and Sander, F. (1987). Effects of eutrophication on reef building corals. Part II.
Structure of scleractinian coral communities on inshore fringing reefs, Barbados,
WI. Marine Biology 94 (1): 53-75.
Tomlinson, P.B. (1986). The Botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
U.K. 413 pp.
Turner, J.R., Vousden, D., Klans, R., Satyanarayana, C., Fenner, D., Venkataraman, K.,
Rajan, P.T., and Subba Rao, N.V. 2001. Report of Phase 1: Remote sensing and rapid
site Assessment Survey, April 2001. Coral Reef Systems of the Andaman Islands.
Govt. of India and United Nations Development Programme, Global Environment
Facility. 768, with appendices and 55 figures and plates.
UNEP-WCMC (2006) In the Front Line: Shoreline Protection and other Ecosystem Services
from Mangroves and Coral Reefs. In: . UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
Veron, J. E. N. and Pichon, M. 1976. Scleractinia of Eastern Australia, Part I. Families
Thamnasteriidae, Astrocoeniddae, Pocilloporidae. Aust. Inst. Mar. Sci. Mon. Ser., 1:
1-86
Veron, J. E. N. and Pichon, M. 1980. Scleractinia of Eastern Australia, Part III. Families
Agarciidae, Siderastreidae, Fungiidae, Oculinidae, Merulinidae, Mussidae,
Pectiniidae, Caryophylliidae, Dendrophylliidae, Aust. Inst. Mar. Sci. Mon. Ser., 4: 1-
422
Veron, J. E. N. and Pichon, M. 1982. Scleractinia of Eastern Australia, Part IV. Family
Poritidae. Aust. Inst. Mar. Sci. Mon. Ser., 5: 1-159
Veron, J. E. N. and Wallace, C. C. 1984. Scleractinia of Eastern Australia, Part V. Family
Acroporidae. Aust. Inst. Mar. Sci. Mon. Ser., 6: 1-485
Veron, J. E. N. 2000. Corals of the World. Vol 3. Australia: Australian Institute of Marine
Sciences and CRR Qld Pty Ltd.
Wood, E. 1989. Coral Mortality on reefs in the Wandoor Marine National Park, Andaman
Islands. SANE Awareness series, 4: Corals. INTACH, A&N Chapter, Port Blair,
14pp.
Wyant, J. G., Meganck, R. A. and Ham, S. H. (1995). A planning and decision-making
framework for ecological restoration. Environ. Manag. 19, 789-796.
Zann, P. L. (1995). Our sea, our future: major findings of the state of the marine environment
report for Australia. Published by the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority for
the Department of Environment, Sport and Territories, Australia.