Consistent nuclear model calculations for deuteron induced reactions on Al and Cu

2nd RCM-FENDL-3, IAEA Vienna, 23-26 March 2010 1 Marilena Avrigeanu

Consistent nuclear model calculations for deuteron Consistent nuclear model calculations for deuteron induced reactions on Al and Cuinduced reactions on Al and Cu

Marilena Avrigeanu and Vlad Avrigeanu

http://tandem.nipne.ro/~vavrig/http://tandem.nipne.ro/~vavrig/, , http://fp6.cordis.lu/fp6/partnershttp://fp6.cordis.lu/fp6/partners/RCN 49105/RCN 49105

"Horia Hulubei" National Institute for Physics and Nuclear Engineering, P.O. Box MG-6, Bucharest, Romania

MotivationMotivationElastic Scattering (OMP)Elastic Scattering (OMP)BreakupBreakupPre-equilibrium Pre-equilibrium Direct reactionsDirect reactionsEvaporationEvaporationActivation cross sections calculationsActivation cross sections calculations

FENDL-3 2nd RC M NDS/IAEA, Vienna, 23-26 March 2010


IFMIF(International Fusion Material Irradiation Facility)

D-Li neutron source for testing fusion reactor candidate materials

General purpose : Activation/transmutation data library [U. Fischer: "Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices“, Nov 2007, IAEA, Vienna]

Urgent need for qualified IFMIF reference data library IEAF/EAF : (n, p, d), to be further developed, improved and validatedCross section measurements required for

neutrons (E >20 MeV): Cr, Co, V, W, Ta, Pb, Bi, Au, Mn

deuterons (E < 40 MeV): Cu, Al, Nbprotons (E < 12 MeV): Cu, Al, Nb, Ta, W, Au, Pb

Evaluations (n, p, d) to be further developed, improved and validated

Reliable gas production cross-section data (H, He)

Dosimetry data file to be developed for E > 20 MeV (IRDF)

Motivation: Data Needs


Nuclear Model Calculations

Pure elastic scattering OP analysis SCAT2 [O. Bersillon] - phenomenological OP + semi-microscopic (DF) OP (local version) DFOLD [M. Avrigeanu] - double folding method

Direct reactions -breakup FRESCO-2003 [I.J. Thompson] - elastic transfer among weakly bound systems - direct reactions, (d,p), (d,n), (d,t)

Composite system equilibration STAPRE-H95 [V. Avrigeanu, M. Avrigeanu] (updated)

- OMP:SCAT2000; preequilibrium: GDH / EXCITON; evaporation: Hauser-Feshbach

TALYS - 1.0 [A. Koning, S. Hilaire, M. Duijvestijn] - OMP:ECIS’97; preequilibrium: MSD / EXCITON; evaporation: Hauser-Feshbach

1+

3+

g.s.

2.18

6Li + dd + 6Lid + d +

-transfer

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

101

103

(b)

pure elastic scattering

c.m.

[deg]

Matsuki + (1969)

0 30 60 90 120 150 18010-1

101

103

(d)

pure elastic scattering

c.m.

[deg]

Chuev + (1971)

100

102

104

g.s.

(a)

6Li(d,d')

d/d

[mb/s

r]

total elastic elastic -transfer

14.7 MeV

10-1

101

103

total elastic elastic -transferg.s.

6Li(d,d)

(c)

19.6 MeV

M. Avrigeanu et al., P.R.C62 (2000) 017001; N.P.A693 (2001) 616; E.PJ.A12 (2001) 399 ; N.P.A723 (2003) 104; N.P.A 764 (2006)

246.

Optical Model

Potential


• NO GLOBAL OPTICAL MODEL POTENTIAL (OMP) for d + Nucleus (A<27) • COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS of global OMPs for d + 27Al, 63,65Cu, 54,56,58Fe, 93Nb:

Lohr-Haeberli (1974): A~40-209, E=8-13 MeVPerey-Perey (1963,1976): A~40-208, E=12-25 MeVDaehnick et al. (1980): A~27-238, E=11.8-90 MeVBojowald et al. (1988): 27Al, 89Y, 120Sn, and 208Pb at Ed=58.7 and 85 MeV

• None of these global OMP describes data at E<15 MeV

• Semi-microscopic OMP by using realistic nucleon-nucleon interactionUDF, & more accurate parameterization for WV, WD, VSO

• Phenomenological OMP : parameterization for UR (frozen W&VSO)

• Cross-Sections calculations

Optical Model Potential


Microscopic Real Optical Potential

U(E,R)= dr1 dr2 1(r1) 2(r2) veff(ρ,E,s=R+r1-r2)

1,2 - density distributions of projectile (1) and target (2)

v(r) - effective NN-interaction: isoscalar and isovector components of direct and exchange parts of M3Y interaction ( g-matrix using Reid/Paris NN potential )

DME-leading term (Negele-Vautherin'72) (R,R+s)=(R+s/2)Ĵ1[kF(R+s/2)s] Campi-Bouyssy'78 for average relative momentum, kF=kav kav(r)=5/(3(r))[(r)-(1/4)2(r)]1/2

Kinetic-Energy Density (: MTF-Krivine-Treiner'79) ()=(r)5/3 + ()2/ The frozen-density approximation (Satchler'79, Khoa'94) F()=F[1(r1+s/2)+2(r2-s/2)].

Approximations

Negele (1970)

54Fe

Negele (1970)

56Fe

0 2 4 6 8

r [fm]

DF:d- Abbott

DF: d- Machleidt-Paris

5 MeV

d + 54Fe

0 2 4 6 80

20

40

60

80

100

120

r [fm]

d + 27Al5 MeV

-UR

eal(r

) [

MeV

]

10-4

10-2

100

Negele (1970)

27Al(

r) [

fm-3]

0 2 4 6 8

r [fm]

5 MeVd + 56Fe

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 Machleidt (2001-CD-Bonn) Machleidt (1989-Paris)

u(r

)/r

[fm

-3/2]

(b)

2H

0 2 4 610-6

10-4

10-2

100 charge density (Abott 2001) Machleidt-CD-Bonn (2001) Machleidt-Paris (1989

(r)

[fm

-3]

r [fm]

(c)

M. Avrigeanu et al., Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, Varenna, 2006, pp.193


1

Strzalkowski+ (1962)

9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

1

Al-Quraishi+ (2000)Schwandt+ (1968)

7 MeV

1

Lohr-Haeberli Daehnick+ This work: microscopic

5 MeV27Al(d,d

0)

(a)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

11.4 MeV

1Igo+ (1961)

11.8 MeV

1

12.8 MeV

1

Lohr+ (1974)

13 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

0.1

1

c.m.

(deg)

Joly+ (1963)

15 MeV

1

9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 1800.01

10

c.m.

(deg)

58.7 MeV(d)

1

7 MeV

1

Haixia+TALYS-1.0This work: phenomenologic

5 MeV 27Al(d,d0)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

11.4 MeV

1

11.8 MeV

0.1

1

12.8 MeV

1

13 MeV

0.1

1

15 MeV

1

52 MeV

10

20

-W

(M

eV

)

WD local

WD average(b)

WV local

WV average

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-10

0

10

-U

(M

eV

)

V

D

Ed (MeV)

(c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

400

800

1200

R (m

b)

Haixia+ TALYS-1.0 ACSELAM this work

d + 27Al

Ed (MeV)

(e)

Mayo+ (1965)Dubat+ (1974)

1


9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

1


7 MeV

1


5 MeV27Al(d,d

0)

(a)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

11.4 MeV

1Igo+ (1961)

11.8 MeV

1

12.8 MeV

1

Lohr+ (1974)

13 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

0.1

1

c.m.

(deg)

Joly+ (1963)

15 MeV

1

9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 1800.01

10

c.m.

(deg)

58.7 MeV(d)

1

7 MeV

1


5 MeV 27Al(d,d0)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

11.4 MeV

1

11.8 MeV

0.1

1

12.8 MeV

1

13 MeV

0.1

1

15 MeV

1

52 MeV

10

20

-W

(M

eV

)

WD local

WD average(b)

WV local

WV average

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-10

0

10

-U

(M

eV

)

V

D

Ed (MeV)

(c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

400

800

1200

R (m

b)


d + 27Al

Ed (MeV)

(e)

Mayo+ (1965)Dubat+ (1974)

1


9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

1


7 MeV

1


5 MeV27Al(d,d

0)

(a)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

11.4 MeV

1Igo+ (1961)

11.8 MeV

1

12.8 MeV

1

Lohr+ (1974)

13 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

0.1

1

c.m.

(deg)

Joly+ (1963)

15 MeV

1

9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 1800.01

10

c.m.

(deg)

58.7 MeV(d)

1

7 MeV

1


5 MeV 27Al(d,d0)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

11.4 MeV

1

11.8 MeV

0.1

1

12.8 MeV

1

13 MeV

0.1

1

15 MeV

1

52 MeV

10

20

-W

(M

eV

)

WD local

WD average(b)

WV local

WV average

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-10

0

10

-U

(M

eV

)

V

D

Ed (MeV)

(c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

400

800

1200

R (m

b)


d + 27Al

Ed (MeV)

(e)

Mayo+ (1965)Dubat+ (1974)

1


9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

1


7 MeV

1


5 MeV27Al(d,d

0)

(a)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

11.4 MeV

1Igo+ (1961)

11.8 MeV

1

12.8 MeV

1

Lohr+ (1974)

13 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

0.1

1

c.m.

(deg)

Joly+ (1963)

15 MeV

1

9.8 MeV

1

9 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 1800.01

10

c.m.

(deg)

58.7 MeV(d)

1

7 MeV

1


5 MeV 27Al(d,d0)

1

11 MeV

0.1

1

11.4 MeV

1

11.8 MeV

0.1

1

12.8 MeV

1

13 MeV

0.1

1

15 MeV

1

52 MeV

10

20

-W

(M

eV

)

WD local

WD average(b)

WV local

WV average

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

-10

0

10

-U

(M

eV

)

V

D

Ed (MeV)

(c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 600

400

800

1200

R (m

b)


d + 27Al

Ed (MeV)

(e)

Mayo+ (1965)Dubat+ (1974)

DF-real & phenomenological imaginary/s.o. potentials Phenomenological OMP

M. Avrigeanu et al., Fusion Eng, Des. 84, 418 (2009)


OMP Analysis for 63,65,natCu(d,d0)

101

103 d/

d (

mb/

sr)

12 MeV63Cu(d,d0)

Lee Jr.+ (1964)

10-1

100

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

Hjort+ (1968)

14.5 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 18010-2

10-1

100

Newman+ (1967)

c.m.

(deg)

34.4 MeV

101

103

Lee Jr. + (1964)

12 MeV65Cu(d,d0)

0 30 60 90 120 150 18010-2

10-1

100

Neuwman+ (1967)

c.m.

(deg)

34.4 MeV

0 20 40 600

500

1000

1500

2000

Ed (MeV)

Bearpark et al. (1965) Dubar et al (1974) present work Daehnick+ (1980) TALYS-1.0 TENDL-2009

Re

act

ion (

mb) d + 63Cu

0 20 40 600

500

1000

1500

2000

Ed (MeV)

Bearpark et al. (1965) Dubar et al. (1974) present work Daehnick+ (1980) TALYSd - 1.0 TENDL-2009

d + 65Cu

101

103

Jahr+ (1961)

11.8 MeV Daehnick + (1980) TALYS-1.0 this work

10-1

100

Igo+ (1961)

11.8 MeVnatCu(d,d0)

20 40 600

500

1000

1500

2000

Mayo+ (1965) Bearpark et al. (1965) present work Daehnick+ (1980) TALYS - 1.0 ACSELAM-library

d + natCu

Ed (MeV)

10-1

100

/

Ru

the

rfo

rd

Jolly+ (1963)

15 MeV

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

100

102

104

d/

d (

mb/

sr)

c.m.

(deg)

Yntema (1959)

21.6 MeV


d + 63,65Cu: activation cross sections first step: d-OMP

10-1

100

101

102

Fulmer+ (1970) Bem+ (2007)Nakao+ 2006 TALYS-1_def. def & OMPd_Avr

63Cu(d,3n)62Zn

0

100

200

300

400

[

mb

] Fulmer+(1970) Okamura+ (1971) Gilly+ (1963) Bem+ (2007) TALYS-1_def. def & OMPd_Avr

63Cu(d,p)64Cu

200

400

600 Fulmer+ (1970) Okamura+ (1971) Gilly+ (1963) Tarkany+ (2006) Nakao+ (2006) Ochiai+ 92007) Bem+ (2007)

63Cu(d,2n)63Zn

0 20 400

1

2

Ed [MeV]

Baron+ (1963) Bem+ (2007) TALYS-1_def. def & OMPd_Avr

65Cu(d,2p)65Ni

0 5 10 15 20 25

200

400

600

Ed [MeV]

Okamura+ (1971) Gilly+ (1963) Fulmer+ (1970) TALYS-1_def. def & OMPd_Avr

65Cu(d,p)66Cu

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

200

400

600

800

1000

Ed [Mev]

Okamura+ (1971) Pement+ (1966) Fulmer+ (1970) Takacs+ (2001) Bem+ (2007) TALYS-1_def. def & OMPd_Avr

65Cu(d,2n)65Zn


d breakup involvement : d+27Al 29Si*

elastic 27Al + d

27Al + n+ p

inelastic (27Al + n) + p

28Al* + p

28Al + γ + p (γp ch. of 29Si*) 27Al + n + p (np ch. of 29Si*) 27Mg + p + p (2p ch. of 29Si*)

24Na + α + p (αp ch. of 29Si*)

inelastic (27Al + p) + n

28Si* +n

28Si + γ + n (γn ch. of 29Si*)

27Si + n + n (2n ch. of 29Si*)

27Al + p + n (pn ch. of 29Si*) 24Mg + α + n (αn ch. of 29Si*)

σBF * σnx /σnTotal

σBF * σpx /σpTotal


d breakup involvement : d+63,65Cu 65,67Zn*

elastic 63,65Cu + d

63,65Cu + n+ p

inelastic (63,65Cu + n) + p

64,66Cu* + p

64,66Cu + γ + p (γp ch. of 65,67Zn*) 63,65Cu + n + p (np ch. of 65,67Zn*) 63,65Ni + p + p (2p ch. of 65,67Zn*)

60,62Co + α + p (αp ch. of 65,67Zn*)

inelastic (63,65Cu + p) + n

64,66Zn* +n

64,66Zn + γ + n (γn ch. of 65,67Zn*)

63,65Zn + n + n (2n ch. of 65,67Zn*)

63,65Cu + p + n (pn ch. of 65,67Zn*) 60,62Ni + α + n (αp ch. of 65,67Zn*)

σBF * σn,x /σnTotal

σBF * σp,x /σpTotal


Empirical breakup components fBU systematics

1 (a) fpTBU= 0.087 – 0.0066 Z + 0.00163 Z A1/3 + 0.0017 A1/3E – 2E-6 ZE2

1 (b) fELBU= 0.031 – 0.0028 Z + 0.00051 Z A1/3 + 0.0005 A1/3E – 1E-6 ZE2

M. Avrigeanu et al., Fusion Eng, Des. 84, 418 (2009)

Q{Al(d,p)} = 5.5 MeV


Deuteron breakup components

100

101

102

103

d + 27Al

- present work

0 5 10 15 20 25100

101

102

103

R

(p)

B

(p)

BE

(p)

BF

(p)

B-Kalbach

Ed (MeV)

d + 65Cu

101

102

103

(

mb)

d + 63Cu

- present work

- present work

0

5

10

15

Ex (

MeV

)

Ep

En

En+/2

27Al(d,n+p)

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

5

10

63Cu(d,n+p)

Ed (MeV)

peak centroid: [Kalbach, TUNL 2008]

Ex = A

x/A

d*(E

inc - 1.44Z

dZ

T/(1.5A

T

1/3 + Rd) +

1.44Z * ZB/(1.5A

T

1/3 + Rd)

FWHM () : = 0.3 (E

inc + 15 MeV ) (1 - A

T/1500)

Rd=1.3


BREAKUP contribution to the SECOND particle emission

σBF(p) vs Ed σBF

(p) vs Ed σBF(n) vs Ed

27Al(n,p)27Mg vs En 27Al(n,α)24Na vs En

27Al(p,n)27Si vs Ep

27Al(n,p)27Mg vs Ed 27Al(n,α)24Na vs Ed

27Al(p,n)27Si vs Ed

[via BF] [via BF] [via BF]

P. Bem,…,M.A.,..Phys. Rev. C 79, 044610 (2009)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0.1

1

10

100

(

mb)

Wilson+ (1976)This work

27Al(d,2p)27Mg

BF add-on BF add (smooth)

(a)

27Al(n,p)27

Mg

(p)BF

0 20 40 60

0.01

0.1

1

10

10027

Al(d,p)24

Na

27

Al(n,)24

Na BF add-on BF add (smooth)

(b)

(p)BF

0 5 10 15 20 25 301

10

100

E (MeV)

27Al(d,2n)27Si Wilson+ (1976)

27Al(p,n)27Si BF add-on BF add (smooth)(c)

(n)BF


OMP: deuteron channel: present work

neutron / proton channels: Koning-Delaroche (2003)

neutron-proton interaction: <φ(d),φ(p/n)>; V=V0e-(r/rd)2

V0=72.15 MeV; rd=1.484 fm

nucleon bound state: <φ(Target),φ(Residual)>; real-WS

V0; r0=1.25; a=0.65

spectroscopic factors, SIJlsj: experimental proton/neutron angular

distributions ΨJM(ξ,r)~∑lsjAIJ

lsj[φItarget(ξ) φlsj]JM;

|AIJlsj|2 = SIJ

lsj

• 35 levels up to 5.135 MeV for the odd-odd 28Al ( 27Al(d,p)28Al)

• 24 levels up to 11.4 MeV for the even-even 28Si ( 27Al(d,n)28Si)

• 63 levels up to 3.030 MeV for the odd-odd 64Cu ( 63Cu(d,p)64Cu)

• 52 levels up to 3.080 MeV for the odd-odd 66Cu ( 65Cu(d,p)66Cu)

• 119 levels up to 6 MeV for the odd-odd 59Co (59Co (d,p) 60Co)

STRIPPING calculations details (FRESCO)

Ep (MeV)

59

Co(d,p)6o

Co - stripping

59

Co(d,p)6o

Co - exp

NO Breakup ? NO Stripping ?

ONLY STATISTICAL Hauser-Feshbach


Stripping contribution (FRESCO-code; 35 levels of 28Al)

0 10 20 30 40 50

1E-11

1E-9

1E-7

1E-5

1E-3

0.1

10

0 30 60 90 120 150

1E-18

1E-16

1E-14

1E-12

1E-10

1E-8

1E-6

1E-4

0.01

1

100

Chen+ (1972)

c.m.

(deg)

d/d

(mb/s

r)

g.s., 3+

27Al(d,p)28AlE

d=6 MeV

0.031, 2+

x102

x104

1.014, 3+

2.138, 2+x106

x108

2.272, 4+

x1010

2.656, 4+

3.465, 4-

x1012

x1014

3.591, 3-

4.904, 2-

x1016

5.135, 3-

x1018

0 20 40 60 80 100

1E-28

1E-26

1E-24

1E-22

1E-20

1E-18

1E-16

1E-14

1E-12

1E-10

1E-8

1E-6

1E-4

0.01

1

c.m.

(deg)

g.s.

Ed=12 MeV

x103

0.031

x106

1.014

Carola+ (1971)

x109

2.138

x1012

2.272

x1015

2.656

x1018

3.465

x1021

3.591

4.765, 2-

4.904

x1024

x1027

DR PE+CN DR+PE+CN

c.m.

(deg)

g.s. + 0.031

1.014

x104

Maher+(1972)

Ed=23 MeV

x105

2.138x106

2.272

2.656

x107

x109

3.465x1010

3.591

4.033, 5-

x1011

4.315, 1+

x1013

g.s. + 0.031


Stripping contribution (FRESCO-code; 18 levels of 28Si)

0 30 60 90 120 150

1E-10

1E-9

1E-8

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1

1

Bohne+ (1969)

c.m.

(deg)

d/d

(mb/s

r)

g.s., 0+

27Al(d,n)28Si

Ed=6 MeV

1.779, 2+x102

x104

4.618, 4+

6.276, 3+

x106

x108

7.799, 3+

0 30 60 90 120 150

1E-10

1E-9

1E-8

1E-7

1E-6

1E-5

1E-4

1E-3

0.01

0.1

1

c.m.

(deg)

DR PE+CN DR+PE+CN

7.930, 2+

x103

8.543,6+ + 8.587,3+

x105

9.319, 3+

Bohne+ (1969)

x107

9.379,2+ + 9.41,5+

x109

10.379, 3+


d + 27Al: activation cross-sections P.Bem,…,M.A.,..Phys. Rev. C 79, 044610 (2009)

5 10 15 20 250

5

10

15

20

25

TALYS-1.0 ACSELAM BF+PE+CN BF PE+CN

27Al(d,2p)27Mg

(e)

Wilson+ (1976) Bem+ (2007)

0 5 10 15 20 250

100

200

300

400

500

TALYS-1.0 TENDL DR+PE+CN DR PE+CN

27Al(d,p)28Al (b)

Wilson+(1976)Bem+ (2007)

10 20 30 40 50 600

20

40

60

80

Ed (MeV)

27Al(d,p)24NaZarubin+ ('79)Weinreich+('80)Michel+ ('82)Tao Zhen+ ('87)Zhao Wen+('95)Takacs+ ('01)Hagiwara+('04)Nakao+ ('06)

(f)

Martens+('70)Watson+('73)Wilson+('76)

TALYS-1.0ACSELAM

BF+PE+CN PE+CN BF

10 15 20 250

10

20

30

4027Al(d,2n)27Si

TALYS-1.0 TENDL BF+PE+CN BF PE+CN

(d)

Wilson+ (1976)

0 5 10 15 20 250

100

200

300

400

(m

b)

TALYS-1.0 TENDL DR+PE+CN DR PE+CN

27Al(d,n)28Si(a)

0 5 10 15 20 250

50

100

150

200

250

TALYS-1.0 TENDL PE+CN

27Al(d,)25MgAl-Quraishi+(2000): (d,x)

(c)


d + 63,65Cu: activation cross-sections M. Avrigeanu, V. Avrigeanu, Eur. Phys. J . Web of Conf. 2, 01004 (2010)

10-3

10-2

10-1

63Cu(d,3n)62Zn

(n)

BF

(p,2n)/

R

Fulmer+ (1970) Bem+ (2007) Nakao+ (2006) present work

(c)

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

(

b)

63Cu(d,p)64CuGilly+ (1963)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+(1971)Bem+ (2007) present work

(a)

0.2

0.4

0.6

63Cu(d,2n)63ZnGilly+ (1963)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+ (1971)Bem+ (2007)Tarkany+ (2006)Ochiai+ (2007) Nakao+ (2006)

(n)

BF

(p,n)/

R

PE+HF: STAPRE-H BF+PE+HF TALYS 1.0

(b)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 4010-4

10-3

Ed (MeV)

65Cu(d,2p)65Ni Baron+ (1963) Bem+ (2007)

(f)

8 16 24 320.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

65Cu(d,p)66Cu Okamura+ (1971) Gilly+ (1963) Fulmer+ (1970)

(p)

BF

(n,)/non

DR: FRESCO PE+HF: STAPRE-H BF+DR+PE+HF TALYS 1.0 TENDL-2009

(d)

10 20 30 40 500.0

0.4

0.8

65Cu(d,2n)65ZnPement+ (1966)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+(1971)Takacs+ (2001)Bem+ (2007) BF+PE+HF TALYS 1.0 TENDL-2009

(e)


d + 63,65Cu: STAPRE-H EMPIRE TALYS

10-3

10-2

10-1

STAPRE-H EMPIRE TALYS 1.0

63Cu(d,3n)62Zn Fulmer+ (1970) Bem+ (2007) Nakao+ (2006)

(c)

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

(

b)

63Cu(d,p)64CuGilly+ (1963)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+(1971)Bem+ (2007)

(a)

0.2

0.4

0.6

63Cu(d,2n)63ZnGilly+ (1963)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+ (1971)Bem+ (2007)Tarkany+ (2006)Ochiai+ (2007) Nakao+ (2006)

BF+STAPRE-H EMPIRE TALYS 1.0

(b)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 4010-4

10-3

Ed (MeV)

65Cu(d,2p)65Ni Baron+ (1963) Bem+ (2007)

(f)

8 16 24 320.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

65Cu(d,p)66Cu Okamura+ (1971) Gilly+ (1963) Fulmer+ (1970)

BF+STAPRE-H+FRESCO EMPIRE TALYS 1.0

(d)

10 20 30 40 500.0

0.4

0.8

BF+STAPRE-H EMPIRE TALYS 1.0

65Cu(d,2n)65Zn

Pement+ (1966)Fulmer+ (1970)Okamura+(1971)Takacs+ (2001)Bem+ (2007)

(e)


d + 93Nb: Activation cross-sections (preliminary results)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7010

0

101

102

103

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-1

100

101

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-2

10-1

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-2

10-1

100

101

102

10-1

100

101

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-1

100

101

102

10 20 30 40 50 60

10-1

100

101

102

Ep (MeV)

(

mb)

93

41Nb(p,n)93m

42Mo

Ep,n

th = 1.2

5 10 15 20 25 30

101

102

103

(

mb)

93

41Nb(n,2n)92m

41Nb

Ep,n

th= 8.927

5 10 15 20 25 3010

-2

10-1

100

101

(

mb)

En (MeV)

93

41Nb(n,)90m

39Y

En,th

= 0.

(

mb)

Ep (MeV)

93Nb(p,n)89Zr

Ep,na

th = 5.61

Ep,dt

th = 23.4

Ditroi+ (2008)

Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,p3n)91mNb Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,tn

th= 10.688

Ed,d2n

th= 17.08

Ed,p3n

th= 19.35

(PE+HF)*(d

R-BUT)/d

R (TALYS 1.2)

inelastic

BU (p,n)/p

R

(PE+HF)*(d

R-BUT)/d

R + inelastic

BU (p,n)/p

R

93Nb(d,2n)93mMoE

d,2n

th= 3.485

Ditroi+ (2000) Tarkanyi+ (2007)

93Nb(d,x)90mY

Ed,p

th= 0.

Ed,d

3He

th= 15.991

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

inelastic

BU(n,)/n

R

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,x)89m+gZrEd,6He

th= 6.946

Ed,2n

th= 7.94

Ed,2t

th= 19.517

inelastic

BU(n,n)/n

R

93Nb(d,x)92mNb

Tarkanyi+ (2007)E

d,t

th= 2.629

Ed,dn

th= 9.022

Ed,p2n

th= 11.295

inelastic

BU(n,2n)/n

R

inelastic

BU (p,d)/p

R

(d,t) - DR: FRESCO

Ep (MeV)

93Nb(p,d)92mNb

Ep,d

th = 6.678

Ep,np

th = 8.927

Kiselev+ (1974)

93Nb(d,x)90m+gNb Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,t2n

th= 22.996

Ed,d3n

th= 29.389

Ed,p4n

th= 31.662

Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,x)88Zr

Ed,3n

th= 17.458

Tarkanyi+ (2007)


d + 93Nb: breakup option in TALYS 1.2

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6010

-1

100

101

102

103

10 20 30 40 50 60

100

101

102

103

Reaction

TALYS-(rotall)

BU

inelastic

Ed [MeV]

R

EA

CT

ION [

mb]

d + 93Nb

Reaction

TALYS 1.2

T-p

BU-FED

elastic

BU-FED)

inelastic-p

BU-FED

(T-p

BU-Kalbach

Ed (MeV)

(m

b)

10-1

100

101

102

100

101

102

10-2

10-1

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-1

100

101

102

0 10 20 30 40 50 6010

-2

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-2

10-1

100

101

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

0

101

102

10-1

100

101

102

TALYS 1.2 Cknock d default TALYS 1.2 Cknock d 0.

(

mb)

93

41Nb(d,n)94

42Mo

93Nb-dx-BUDEF

Qd,n

= +6.266 Cknock d default Cknock d 0


Ed,tn

th= 10.688

Ed,d2n

th= 17.08

Ed,p3n

th= 19.35


93Nb(d,2n)93mMoE

d,2n

th= 3.485


(

mb)

Cknock d default Cknock d 0

93Nb(d,p)90mY

Ed,p

th= 0.

Ed,d

3He

th= 15.991

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Cknock d default Cknock d 0

(

mb)

Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,2n)89m+gZr

Ed,

6He

th= 6.946

Ed,2n

th= 7.94

Ed,2t

th= 19.517

Cknock d default Cknock d 0.

93Nb(d,p2n)92mNb

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,t

th= 2.629

Ed,dn

th= 9.022

Ed,p2n

th= 11.295


Ed (MeV)

(

mb)

93Nb(d,p)94Nb Q

d,p = +5.003

Ed (MeV)


93Nb(d,p4n)90m+gNb Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,t2n

th= 22.996

Ed,d3n

th= 29.389

Ed,p4n

th= 31.662


Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,3n)88Zr

Q=-17.089

Tarkanyi+ (2007)


d + 93Nb: breakup option in TALYS 1.0 & 1.2

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 6010

-1

100

101

102

103

10 20 30 40 50 60

100

101

102

103

Reaction

TALYS-(rotall)

BU

inelastic

Ed [MeV]

R

EA

CT

ION [

mb]

d + 93Nb

Reaction

TALYS 1.2

T-p

BU-FED

elastic

BU-FED)

inelastic-p

BU-FED

(T-p

BU-Kalbach

Ed (MeV)

(m

b)

10-1

100

101

102

100

101

102

10-2

10-1

100

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-3

10-2

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-1

100

101

102

0 10 20 30 40 50 6010

-2

10-1

100

101

102

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

-2

10-1

100

101

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 4510

0

101

102

10-1

100

101

102

TALYS 1.2 Cknock d default TALYS 1.2 Cknock d 0. TALYS 1.0 Cknock d default TALYS 1.0 Cknock d 0.

(

mb)

93

41Nb(d,n)94

42Mo

93Nb-dx-BUDEFb

Qd,n

= +6.266 TALYS 1.2 Cknock d default TALYS 1.2 Cknock d 0 TALYS 1.0 Cknock d default TALYS 1.0 Cknock d 0.


Ed,tn

th= 10.688

Ed,d2n

th= 17.08

Ed,p3n

th= 19.35


93Nb(d,2n)93mMoE

d,2n

th= 3.485


(

mb)

TALYS 1.2 Cknock d default TALYS 1.2 Cknock d 0 TALYS 1.0 Cknock d default TALYS 1.0 Cknock d 0.

93Nb(d,p)90mY

Ed,p

th= 0.

Ed,d

3He

th= 15.991

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Tarkanyi+ (2007)


(

mb)

Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,2n)89m+gZrE

d,6He

th= 6.946

Ed,2n

th= 7.94

Ed,2t

th= 19.517


93Nb(d,p2n)92mNb

Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,t

th= 2.629

Ed,dn

th= 9.022

Ed,p2n

th= 11.295


Ed (MeV)

(

mb)

93Nb(d,p)94Nb Q

d,p = +5.003

Ed (MeV)


93Nb(d,p4n)90m+gNb Tarkanyi+ (2007)

Ed,t2n

th= 22.996

Ed,d3n

th= 29.389

Ed,p4n

th= 31.662


Ed (MeV)

93Nb(d,3n)88Zr

Q=-17.089

Tarkanyi+ (2007)


CONCLUSIONS

Semi-microscopic OMP analysisUDF: ρd (charge) & ρAl (charge) & M3Y Paris-NNWD & VSO phenomenological

improved agreement with data adding the dispersion corrections

Phenomenological OMP analysis for 27Al, 63.65,natCu, 93Nb agreement with all available measured data good description of (d,d) data vs. TALYS default OMPs improved description of (d,d) data vs. global OMPs

Completion of d+27Al,63,65Cu activation cross sections BU, BF - Deuteron break-up mechanism contributions, DR mechanism considered trough n & p strippingPE and evaporation mechanisms contributions

Comparison of STAPRE-H / TALYS-1.0 activation cross sections Preliminary results for d+93Nb activation cross sections involving TALYS 1.2

NEED to UPDATE the d-activation libraries


Thank youThank you ! !


Date post:	09-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	gordy
View:	43 times
Download:	2 times

Consistent nuclear model calculations for deuteron induced reactions on Al and Cu

Documents