Date post: | 15-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | octavia-scott |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Constitution, Society, and Leadership
Week 5 Unit 5Concepts of Law:
Moral Obligation?
Christopher Dreisbach, Ph.D.Johns Hopkins University
So far Three theories of law▪ Natural Law▪ Legal Positivism▪ Legal Realism
Natural Law theory is the one that (in most cases) posits a necessary connection between law and morality
2
Two questions regarding law and morality▪ Must a law be morally good?▪ Is one morally obliged to obey a law, whether
or not the law is morally good? Feinberg & Coleman address this second
question in Ch. 7.
3
Feinberg & Coleman, Ch. 7: “Is there a Moral Obligation to Obey the Law?” Three Selections▪ Plato, Crito▪ M. B. E. Smith,
Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law?▪ Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from Birmingham
Jail
4
Plato, Crito▪ Socrates: There is a moral obligation to obey the law▪ Back story:▪ Socrates awaits execution
On bogus charges▪ His wealthy friend, Crito, has bribed a guard and offers to help
Socrates escape▪ Socrates agrees to escape only if Crito can convince him that
it is the just thing to do
5
Crito’s argument▪ If Socrates does not escape▪ Crito will lose a cherished friend▪ Most people will think that Crito was too cheap to
help Socrates▪ Socrates’ children will be deprived▪ Socrates will have the reputation of being a coward
6
Socrates’ quick response to Crito▪ Don’t worry about what “most people” think▪ Only what wise and reasonable people think
▪ “The important thing is not to live, but to live well”▪ To live well is to live honorably▪ To live honorably is to do the right thing
7
▪ So, is it right to escape rather than suffer the punishment?▪ No▪ Two extended arguments
From Duty (Deontological) From Consequences
8
Socrates’ argument from duty One must never knowingly do wrong▪ It is dishonorable
It is wrong to injure in retaliation One ought to fulfill one’s agreements—
especially if one freely and knowingly enters into them
If Socrates escapes he would be▪ Injuring Athens in retaliation▪ Violating his agreement to abide by Athens’ laws
Therefore, it would be wrong—dishonorable—to escape
9
Socrates’ argument from Consequences To escape would be to develop a deservedly
bad reputation ▪ Coward▪ Disobedient
This bad reputation would make life miserable▪ Socrates wouldn’t be able to practice philosophy
To live miserably is not to live well Therefore, Socrates shouldn’t escape
10
M. B. E. Smith, Is There a Prima Facie Obligation to Obey the Law? No. Let PF=“There is a prima facie obligation
to obey the law”
11
Two arguments in brief Negative argument▪ There are three arguments for PF▪ These arguments fail▪ Therefore, no PF
Positive argument▪ If PF in meaningful sense, then PF is serious or
substantial▪ If PF is serious or substantial, it must pass one of 2
tests▪ It’s possible to break a law without violating either test▪ Therefore, no PF
12
Negative argument—expanded Three arguments in defense of PF: Based
on▪ Individual benefits one can receive from
obeying the law▪ Implied consent or promise▪ Utility—the greatest good for the greatest
number
13
14
Argument 2: By living in a community I (at least) implicitly consent to play by its rules—obey its laws▪ Smith▪ Implicit consent is not consent▪ Even if we could make sense of “implicit consent,”
e.g., when I vote, I consent to obey the authority This is not self-evident, so not PF
15
Argument 3: Obedience promotes the greatest good; disobedience the opposite▪ Smith▪ Not always: the law might be a bad one▪ Might be a good law whose violation does not make
matters better or worse
16
Positive Argument—Expanded Two tests:▪ PF is serious “if, and only if, an act which
violates the obligation and fulfills no other is seriously wrong”▪ PF is serious “if, and only if, violation of it
would make considerably worse an act which on other grounds is already wrong”
17
Smith▪ Response to Test 1: running a stop sign at an
otherwise deserted intersection at 2:00 AM▪ Broke the law
But no serious wrong
▪ Response to Test 2: intentional fraud▪ That one broke the law did not make the act morally
worse
18
Martin Luther King, Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail Obligation to▪ Obey just laws▪ Disobey unjust laws
Back story▪ King in Birmingham jail for leading nonviolent
protest in Birmingham▪ Without a legal parade permit▪ Eight clergymen publish criticism of King▪ King responds
19
King’s basic argument (i) “Injustice anywhere is a threat to
justice everywhere.” (ii) People are obliged to fight against
injustice—nonviolently▪ Four steps to any non-violent campaign▪ Collect facts: Has there been an injustice▪ Negotiate: If successful no need for next 2 steps▪ Purify self: ‘This isn’t about me!’▪ Take direct action
20
21
▪ Augustine: “An unjust law is no law at all”▪ “An individual who breaks a law that conscience tells
him is unjust, and who willingly accepts the penalty of imprisonment in order to arouse the conscience of the community over its injustice, is in reality expressing the highest respect for law”
22
Week 5 Unit 5Concepts of Law:Moral Obligation?
23