+ All Categories
Home > Documents > CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Date post: 11-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: komala
View: 36 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW . CLASS 19 February 19, 2008 More on Executive Power – Can Congress Increase Executive Power? . Clinton v. New York (1998) Can Congress expand executive power by authorizing the line-item veto ?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
18
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW CLASS 19 February 19, 2008 More on Executive Power – Can Congress Increase Executive Power?
Transcript
Page 1: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

CLASS 19February 19, 2008

More on Executive Power – Can Congress Increase Executive Power?

Page 2: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Clinton v. New York (1998) Can Congress expand executive power by authorizing the

line-item veto ?

• Majority by: StevensJoined by: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, GinsburgConcurrence by: KennedyConcurrence/dissent by: ScaliaJoined by: O'Connor; Breyer (in part)Dissent by: BreyerJoined by: O'Connor, Scalia (in part)

Page 3: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Legislative Line-Item Veto Act of 2006

• Did not make it into law although passed by House

• Would this be constitutional?

Page 4: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

LIMITS ON EXECUTIVE POWER

• Non-delegation doctrine• 2 New Deal era cases enforced this

doctrine

Page 5: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan (1935) [C p. 294]

• Chief Justice Hughes wrote the majority opinion, joined by Sutherland, Butler, Van Devanter, Stone, Roberts, McReynolds, Brandeis

• Cardozo was the only dissenter

Page 6: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495

(1935) [C p. 293]• Chief Justice Charles

Evans Hughes wrote the majority opinion, joined by 6 other justices (Four Horsemen, Roberts, and Brandeis)

• Justice Cardozo wrote a concurring opinion, joined by Stone

Page 7: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Current Status of the Non-Delegation Doctrine?

• See, e.g. unanimous decision of the Court in Whitman v. American Trucking Ass’n, Inc. (2001) [C p. 296]

• Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court

Page 8: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

INS v. Chadha (1983) [C p. 299]• Can Congress keep

control of executive actions by the use of the legislative veto?

• Majority opinion by CJ Burger, joined by Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Stevens, O’Connor

• Concurrence by Powell• Dissent by White• Dissent by Rehnquist,

joined by White

Page 9: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Clinton v. New York (1998)• Can Congress expand

executive power?• Majority by: Stevens

Joined by: Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, GinsburgConcurrence by: KennedyConcurrence/dissent by: ScaliaJoined by: O'Connor; Breyer (in part)Dissent by: BreyerJoined by: O'Connor, Scalia (in part)

Page 10: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

George W. Bush’s efforts to revive the line-item veto

• Legislative Line-Item Veto Act of 2006 (HR 4890)

• Testimony at: http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=7079&sequence=0

• Passed the House in 2006, killed in the Senate in January 2007

Page 11: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

SLICE Act of 2007 (HR 595)

• Introduced January 2007 by Mark Udall (D-Colo)

• Authorizes president to identify specific provisions he thinks should be cut and then requires Congress to vote on those.

Page 12: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Buckley v. Valeo (1976) (CB p. 403)

• Per curiam opinion• Can Congress

appoint executive officers (majority of members of FEC)?

Page 13: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Removal Power

• Impeachment ofAndrew Johnson afterhe fired Secretary of

War Edwin Stanton

Page 14: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Myers v. United States (1926)• Chief Justice William

Howard Taft (a former president from 1909-1913) wrote the majority opinion joined by Van Devanter, Sutherland, Butler, Sanford, StoneDissent by: HolmesDissent by: McReynoldsDissent by: Brandeis

Page 15: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935)

• Unanimous opinion written by Justice Sutherland

Page 16: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Wiener v. United States (1958)

• Did the Court apply the Humphrey’s or Myers rule?

• Unanimous opinion by Justice Frankfurter

Page 17: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Bowsher v. Synar (1986) (CB p. 404)

• BURGER delivered the opinion of the Court, in which BRENNAN, POWELL, REHNQUIST, and O'CONNOR joined. STEVENS filed an opinion concurring in the judgment in which MARSHALL joined. WHITE and BLACKMUN, filed dissenting opinions

Page 18: CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

Morrison v. Olson (1988) (CB p. 410)

• Justice Rehnquist delivered the majority opinion

• Justice Kennedy did not participate

• Justice Scalia dissented


Recommended