REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
i
DISCLAIMER
The information in the body of this report is based on expert knowledge, has been drawn from
engagements with the Ministry of Social Protection and interested stakeholders, and is enhanced
with material in the public domain on caring for the elderly and management of elderly care
facilities. It has also been reviewed by and validated with the Ministry of Social Protection.
This report is largely based on information received or obtained, on the basis that such information
is accurate and complete. This information has not been subject to an audit, and the author accepts
no responsibility or liability for the information (all statements and statistics) contained herein.
Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing paragraphs, the author does not warrant or
guarantee that the guidance provided in this report will lead to any particular outcome or result.
This disclaimer governs the use of this report. By using this report, you accept this disclaimer in full.
CREDITS: COVER PHOTOGRAPHS
Aubrey Odle, Ministry of Social Protection
Source: Ministry of Social Protection’s Facebook Page
COVER PAGE DESIGN
Sharissa Barrow
President and Consultant, Dochas Consulting
PREPARED BY: Sharissa Barrow, President and Consultant, Dochas Consulting
Dochas Consulting is a social enterprise that aims to empower vulnerable women and girls in
Guyana, and provide quality and reliable value-added services to governments, businesses, and
international organisations seeking to build economic and social foundations in Guyana and across
the Caribbean. On the business end, Dochas Consulting offers consultancies in the international
development and business, project management, disaster risk management, social development,
and education sectors. On the social end, the team works to empower vulnerable girls in the formal
Child Protection System by providing ongoing and focused mentoring and life skills development
support. Dochas Consulting further contributes at least 5% of all revenue earned doing consultancies
to expand its work with and support of vulnerable girls in Guyana.
[email protected] ₪ 592-222-4943 ₪ www.dochasconsulting.com
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 1
2. Assignment Overview ......................................................................................................................... 2
3. Contextual Framework........................................................................................................................ 6
4. Situational Analysis of Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana ........................................................ 13
5. Proposed Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana ..................................... 19
6. The Way Forward .............................................................................................................................. 34
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1: Site Observation Checklist Used for Field Visits to Elderly Care Facilities. ....................... 35
Appendix 2: Summary Reports for Field Visits to Elderly Care Facilities .............................................. 39
Appendix 3: Data Collection Protocols Used for Field Visits to Elderly Residential Facilities ............... 45
Appendix 4: References and Resources ................................................................................................ 51
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Population Pyramid: Guyana 2002 .......................................................................................... 6
Figure 2: Distribution of Elderly by Tenure of Dwelling Unit Where They Reside .................................. 7
Figure 3: Distribution of Elderly with Disabilities .................................................................................... 7
Figure 4: Actors in the Elderly Residential Care Sub-Sector ................................................................. 18
ACRONYMS
BP Blood Pressure
CPR Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
DSS Director of Social Services
GBTI Guyana Bank for Trade and Industry
GPHC Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation
MoPH Ministry of Public Health
MoSP Ministry of Social Protection
NBS New Building Society
NCE National Commission on the Elderly
NGO Non-governmental Organisation
OAP Old Age Pension
OHS Occupational Health and Safety
PA Public Assistance
PCA Personal Care Assistant
TOR Terms of Reference
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
1
1. INTRODUCTION
The Ministry of Social Protection is the premier agency charged to ensure the welfare—health,
happiness and fortune—of Guyanese citizens. Its mission is to “contribute to economic and social
development by maintaining a stable industrial relations climate, formulating policies, and providing
integrated employment, training, and social and welfare services”1. The Ministry thus promotes safe
and healthy work environments for all Guyanese, and provides critical social services for poor and
vulnerable populations, including children, women, the elderly, and the disabled.
The Ministry’s 2015-2020 strategic priority is to reduce poverty and inequality, and thus plans to
enhance the quality of services and benefits provided to old age pensioners, public servants,
children, the differently-abled, vulnerable women, youth, and other underprivileged and
underserved populations, including the elderly. To this end, the Ministry allocates a significant
portion of its budget to providing old age pension (OAP) and public assistance (PA) services. In fact,
of the $8,881,262,000 allocated to Programme II (Social Services), 90.57% ($8,043,682,000) was
spent on OAP and PA in 2015. This continues a multi-year trend of allocating the majority of the
programme’s budget to these welfare and social security services.
As a critical part of this work, the Ministry oversees all of the elderly care facilities in Guyana, and
administers the Palms Geriatric Facility. Established in 1874 under British rule, the Palms has been
the final home of thousands of Guyana’s senior citizens. It is fully funded by the Government of
Guyana ($71.78 million in 2013, $92.94 million in 2014 and $82.99 million in 2015) and provides free
care for the indigent. This care covers medical, nursing, dietary, and social needs, and includes the
provision of rehabilitative therapies to both residents and out-patients and of a hospitable physical
and social environment for the long term care of its residents2. The Palms has the capacity to house
240 residents, and admission is primarily based on age, indigence, and medical need.
Despite considerable investment (public and private) at the Palms and other elderly residential
facilities, they still face significant challenges, including the inability to attract and retain committed
human resources, limited ownership from the families (where available) to assist in the general care
and welfare of the elderly, and poor management and accountability. These issues are generally
common across the country’s elderly residential facilities. Still, because of differing management
arrangements, geographic vulnerabilities, and local realities, each facility operates differently and
faces some unique challenges. This not only complicates the management and oversight of these
facilities, but underscores the need for core minimum standards to establish a national framework
for the care and protection of elderly in residential care, provide a common system for monitoring
and regulating public and private elderly residential facilities, and allow for improved allocation of
resources to elderly care facilities.
1 Ministry of Social Protection. < https://www.facebook.com/Ministry-of-Social-Protection-
107102069644775/info/?tab=page_info>. 2 Ministry of Social Protection. <
http://www.mlhsss.gov.gy/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=188&Itemid=77>.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
2
2. ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
2.1 Purpose
The overarching purpose of this consultancy is to propose minimum standards for elderly residential
facilities in line with international best practices and Guyana’s obligations under international
treaties and agreements. The intention is to then use the minimum standards developed to inform
decision-making on the future operations of elderly care facilities across Guyana, and recommend
mechanisms for the efficient monitoring and oversight of these facilities.
2.2 Scope
The goal of this assignment is to develop a comprehensive national framework, vis-a-vis minimum
operational standards, for residential care facilities for older persons in Guyana. Consequently, it has
included a review of the existing state of elderly residential care facilities and the care provided to
residents, the identification of critical areas for action to bring the facilities’ operations into
alignment with international standards and best practices, and the gathering of tacit and expert
knowledge to ground the standards in local realities.
That notwithstanding, it is recognised that the status of the elderly nationally and the ability of
national systems to respond to the unique psychosocial, economic, health, and development needs
of older persons have an impact on the operations of residential care facilities. This assignment thus
underpins the assessment of elderly residential facilities within the wider perspective of the national
cultural, political, economic, and social perspectives of older persons; their care and well-being; and
human rights.
2.3 Approach
With this emphasis on developing locally-grounded minimum standards based on stakeholder needs
and international best practices, the Consultant adopted a participatory, utility-driven approach. This
approach has helped to engender stakeholder buy-in of the process, inform the structure of and
considerations addressed in the proposed minimum standards, and increase the probability of
stakeholder acceptance of the standards proposed. It has involved:
Engaging a number of key stakeholders, including representatives of the requisite
departments in the MoSP and Ministry of Public Health, as well as members of the National
Commission on the Elderly, and management teams of elderly care facilities across Guyana;
Incorporating stakeholder recommendations into all of the assignment deliverables;
Facilitating a Technical Consultation Meeting with key technocrats in the sector;
Conducting visits to a sample of elderly care facilities and engaging senior citizens at those
facilities; and,
Seeking input from the MoSP into the design of the Technical Consultation Meeting and the
list of persons for focused stakeholder interviews.
2.4 Methodology
A number of qualitative methods have been utilised in the collection of data to inform the
elaboration of Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana. These methods were
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
3
participatory-driven and accounted for differences in the size, management, location, and
experience of elderly residential facilities across Guyana.
2.4.1 Literature Review
A targeted review of available literature on elderly in Guyana was undertaken to ensure that the
standards articulated are grounded within the local context. There was also a substantive review of
the Minimum Standards of Elderly Residential Facilities of countries around the world (like Trinidad
and Tobago, Ireland, Anguilla, and South Africa) to facilitate the adoption of international best
practices and avoid ‘reinventing the wheel’ on regulatory standards and operational practices that
have been tried, tested, and proven.
2.4.2 Document Review
A comprehensive review of MoSP workplans, budgets, and reports of capacity-building efforts at the
Palms Geriatric Facility was also undertaken. This included a review of Follow-up Performance Audit
Report: An Assessment of the Living Conditions of the Residents of the Palms Geriatric Institution
published by the Audit Office of Guyana in 2015, which provided insight into the level of resources
provided to the facility and the quality of care made possible by those resources.
2.4.3 Observation
Site visits to a sample of residential care facilities in Georgetown were also conducted to allow the
Consultant to gain a firsthand understanding of the realities at some of the facilities in Guyana. A key
component of these site visits was a walkabout to document and photograph the operations and
physical conditions of the facilities. To ensure consistency in the observational assessment
performed and promote transparency, a site observation checklist was utilised. This checklist is
enclosed as Appendix 1 and a summary reports for each visit is included under Appendix 2.
2.4.4 Semi-Structured Stakeholder Interviews and Focus Group Discussions
The site visits to the residential care facilities began with semi-structured interviews and focus group
discussions with the management, staff, and residents of the facilities. These interviews and
discussions helped to capture the nuanced experiences, observations, and knowledge of the
interviewee as well as facilitate exploration of issues and ideas as they emerged. The data collection
protocols used for these interviews and discussions are enclosed as Appendix 3.
There were also discussions with key resource persons within the Ministry of Social Protection
(Director of Social Services, Head of the Child Care and Protection Agency, and the Assistant Chief
Probation and Social Services Officer) to enhance the Consultant’s understanding of past efforts, as
well as current constraints and opportunities, to improve the quality of services provided to senior
citizens.
2.4.5 Technical Consultations
A Technical Consultation Meeting was held on Tuesday, March 8th, 2016 to capture the experiences
of sector experts and technocrats involved in the operation and support of elderly residential
facilities. Specifically, this Meeting allowed for the generation of a cross-sectoral list of challenges
experienced by and opportunities available to these facilities, as well as exploration of possible
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
4
solutions to these challenges. Importantly, this process also helped to engender stakeholder buy-in
of the consultative process being undertaken.
2.4.6 Debriefs
In keeping with the consultative, utility-driven focus of this approach, continuous updates and
debriefs were provided to the Ministry of Social Protection to identify information gaps and
engender continued confidence in the process to articulate minimum standards for residential
facilities for senior citizens in Guyana.
2.5 Sampling
The entire population of relevant duty-bearers were engaged through focused stakeholder
interviews. However, because of the focus of the assignment’s mandate and time constraints, only a
sample of elderly care facilities in Georgetown were visited. These facilities were chosen based on
purposive sampling, specifically maximum variation sampling. Maximum variation sampling allowed
the Consultant to choose facilities that represented a range of differences and extremes3 necessary
to develop a holistic picture of the operation, challenges facing, and opportunities available to
elderly care facilities across Guyana.
The criteria used to select the facilities for site visits were as follows:
Administered by the State, Church, and private owners;
Single and mixed-sex institutions;
Small and large resident populations;
Well- and newly-established institutions; and,
Publically-perceived ‘good’ and ‘bad’ facilities.
In the end, the elderly residential facilities that were visited included the Palms Geriatric Facility,
Uncle Eddie’s Home, St. Thomas Moore Men’s Homestead, Salvation Army Ladies’ Senior Citizen’s
Home, Sister’s Missionary of Charity, and the Holy Family Elderly Facility. Attempts to visit the Gentle
Women’s Home and Demerara Paradise Inc. proved unsuccessful due to time constraints and
competing priorities, but representatives of both facilities were invited to participate in the
Technical Consultation Meeting.
Importantly, all of the facilities visited were in Georgetown due to time and resource constraints.
This did not affect the representativeness of the data gathered as the capital city has the majority of
residents and facilities, and sector experts and oversight agencies with national perspectives were
able to speak to the experiences of the sub-group of facilities outside of Georgetown in the
stakeholder interviews and focus group discussions.
Finally, the Consultant recommended stakeholders for participation in the Technical Consultation
Meeting based on expert sampling. Expert sampling involves selecting a group of persons with
demonstrable experience and expertise in a particular subject area to gather tacit knowledge and
validate the approach taken and the data gathered from another sampling approach4. This allowed
3 Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods. Sage Publications. India, 2007.
4 Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods. Sage Publications. India, 2007.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
5
for the data gathered during the document and literature reviews and semi-structured interviews
and discussions to be triangulated and cross-validated.
2.6 Data Sources
The Consultant drew contextual information from MoSP reports and budgets, interviews and focus-
group engagements with key stakeholders, site visits to a sample of elderly residential facilities, and
discussions with elderly persons who utilise the services at those facilities. Information on
international best practices to care for the elderly and the experiences of sister countries in
administering residential care facilities were drawn from publically available plans, studies, and
reports.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
6
3. CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK
3.1 Overview: Elderly in Guyana5
In Guyana, the retirement age is 55 years for the public service and 60 - 65 years for the private
sector. Persons become eligible for retirement benefits at age 60. The elderly (interchangeably
referred to as older persons or senior citizens) will thus be considered to be those persons aged 60
years and over.
In 2002, the number of persons in Guyana aged 60 years and older was 46,839, with a male-to-
female ratio of 87 (21,725 males and 25,114 females). This represented 6.2% of the total population
and a steady increase in the country’s elder population (5.4% in 1970, 5.7% in 1980, and 5.9% in
1991), likely in part because of enhanced life expectancy (60 for males and 67 for females in 20136).
While the increase itself is not significant, this trend signals a need to consider age demographics in
economic and social development planning, and to consider the phased reallocation of resources
among age groups.
Still, Guyana’s population is relatively young, with a median age of 22.9 years and 11 elderly for
every 100 economically-active persons. Guyana thus has an expansive population (larger numbers of
young people) as depicted in Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Population Pyramid: Guyana 2002
Data Source: Bureau of Statistics, Guyana
Of the elderly population, 30,349 were heads of their households while 15,227 were living in
households where they were not the head (1,263 did not report their head of household). Of those
who were household heads, 42.3% were female. 38% of those who were not heads of their
households were residing in a household where the head of household was 65 years or older,
representing moderate age liability.
5 Unless otherwise stated, data used has been taken from Beaie, Sonkarley Tiatun. 2002 Population & Housing Census –
National Census Report. Guyana, 2007. 6 World Health Organisation. Guyana: Country Profile. 2016. <http://www.who.int/countries/guy/en/>.
8 6 4 2 0 2 4 6 8
0 - 4 5 - 9
10 - 14 15 - 19 20 - 24 25 - 29 30 - 34 35 - 39 40 - 44 45 - 49 50 - 54 55 - 59 60 - 64 65 - 69 70 - 74
75+
Percent of Population
Age
Gro
up
Female
Male
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
7
31.4% of elderly men and 9.4% of elderly women continue to participate in the workforce past age
60. Among those who want to work, approximately 94% were gainfully employed. Consequently,
28.4% of elderly men’s and 8.1% of elderly women’s main source of livelihood was employment or
their own monies. Pension benefits are the main source of income for 55.3% and 52.2% of men and
women respectively. 14.3% and 14.7% of elderly women’s main source of livelihood was from
parental or spousal support and support from other persons respectively, compared to 1.6% and
6.1% for elderly men.
Interestingly, 37,623 persons aged 60 years and older owned the dwelling unit where they lived.
3,484 rented their dwelling (from a private owner or the government) and 3,694 lived in their
dwelling rent-free.
Figure 2: Distribution of Elderly by Tenure of Dwelling Unit Where They Reside
Data Source: Bureau of Statistics, Guyana
Finally, 39.4% of persons (18,052) aged 60 and above had some form of disability. The most common
disabilities were related to sight (5,675), mobility (3,875), body movement (2,492), hearing (1,933),
and gripping (1,247). A complete breakdown of the common disabilities among the elderly is
presented in Figure 3 below. This breakdown helps to shed light on the required areas of focus for
the minimum standards that follow.
Figure 3: Distribution of Elderly with Disabilities
Data Source: Bureau of Statistics, Guyana
82.10%
1.20%
7.40% 8.70% Owned
Squatted
Rented - Private
Rented - Government
Leased
Rent Free
Not Stated
31.40%
10.70%
4.20%
21.50%
13.80%
6.90%
2.30% 4.30%
1.20% 3.60% Disability Type
Sight
Hearing
Speech
Mobility
Body Movement
Gripping
Learning
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
8
3.2 National Context
The Laws of Guyana mandate children to take care of their parents. Section 4 of Chapter 45:03, the
Maintenance Act, reads thus:
Everyone born in wedlock is hereby required to maintain his or her father and mother, and
grandfathers and grandmothers; and everyone not born in wedlock is hereby required to
maintain his or her mother, and also the man (if any) with whom his or her mother openly
cohabitated at the time of his or her birth, provided that man recognised and treated him or
her as the man’s child during his or her infancy, and also the man who is his or her father,
whether or not his or her mother openly cohabitated with that man at the time of his or her
birth, provided that during his or her infancy that man had acknowledged him or her as the
man’s child and contributed towards his or her maintenance, if the father or mother or other
person aforesaid , or all or any of those persons are, by reason of old age, or bodily or mental
infirmity, unable to maintain himself, herself, or themselves. (4-5)
Culturally, this law is generally respected and many children support the social, economic, and
physiological health of their parents. Some parents reside with their children and, often
grandparents by that time, aid in caring for their grandchildren. However, many are left alone during
the day when children are at work and grandchildren at school due to the lack of non-resident
centres that offer social and recreational activities for senior citizens, and little involvement or
support from NGOs and community-based centres.
Many others continue to reside on their own after retirement. These senior citizens enjoy their
independence, are able to have the benefit of aging in their homes and, in many cases, continue to
work (in the formal or informal sectors). However, they are particularly vulnerable to accidents,
exploitation, theft and, in the case of elderly women in recent years, murder. Moreover, public
infrastructure and transportation systems are not easily accessible to the elderly, especially the
physically infirmed, and basic services (like banking and utilities) are still being adapted to respond
to the unique needs of the elderly.
Some others are forced into residential facilities due to poverty, migration, poor health, and
negative changes in societal values and norms. Too often, persons enrolled in these facilities are ‘left
to die’, with few children in an economic or social position to visit their parents and contribute to
their psychosocial care while at the facility. The result is the overwhelming of many of the existing
care facilities, and poor mental and emotional health among residents.
Against this backdrop, in October 2015, the Government of Guyana reiterated its commitment to the
elderly in Guyana at the launch of the Month of the Elderly. Specifically, the Government committed
to addressing administrative and quality-of-care issues at the Palms, and more deeply incorporating
population dynamics and demographics into economic and social development planning in the short
term. In the medium- to long-term, it has committed to seeking funding to construct a modern,
elderly facility and develop a non-resident social and recreational programme for senior citizens.
This commitment has resulted in a plethora of initial activities including training for the staff at the
Palms, introduction of a robust schedule of social activities for senior citizens during the month of
October, and the resuscitation of the National Commission on the Elderly.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
9
Established in 2012, the National Commission on the Elderly was intended to:
Support community outreach programmes to raise awareness of the needs of and issues
affecting senior citizens, and children’s responsibilities to their parents;
Oversee residential care facilities across Guyana;
Organise social, educational, and recreational activities for senior citizens in and out of
residential care;
Advocate for the enhancement of critical services provided to (like Old Age Pension) and
used by (like public transportation and health) the elderly;
Conduct awareness campaigns to address abuse of the elderly in care facilities and at home;
and,
Develop minimum standards for residential care facilities.
The Commission functioned for a short period, but quickly went dormant, leaving many of its
activities incomplete. It has recently been re-established and had its first meeting on Wednesday,
February 3rd, 2016.
Ultimately, the reprioritisation of the completion of the minimum standards for elderly residential
facilities is a result of the focus on providing quality services to elderly in residential care and the
reestablishment of the NCE.
3.3 Global Context
Worldwide, life expectancy increased from 46 to 68 years from 1950 to 2010, and the proportion of
older persons in the population is expected to increase exponentially over the next 35 years7. This
has implications for national health, social security, and welfare systems. It will also affect labour
laws and the roles of families, communities, and societies in caring for the elderly.
Guyana’s observance of International Day of Older Persons and renewed commitment to supporting
its elderly is in line with its commitment to the United Nations Principles for Older Persons adopted
in 1991 and the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing adopted in 2002. Both the Principles
and the Action Plan were the result of the need to directly and more strategically protect the human
rights of and develop responsive programmes and policies for the elderly due to the existing and
expected continued increase in the elderly population of the world.
The United Nations Principles for Older Persons revolve around five key themes: independence,
participation, care, self-fulfilment, and dignity8.
3.3.1 Independence:
Older persons should have access to adequate food, water, shelter, clothing and health care
through the provision of income, family, and community support and self-help.
Older persons should have the opportunity to work or to have access to other income-
generating opportunities.
7 United Nations. Background: International Day of Older Persons. 2015. <
http://www.un.org/en/events/olderpersonsday/background.shtml>. 8 United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Principles for Older Persons: Adopted by General Assembly resolution
46/91 of 16 December 1991. New York, 1991. <http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/46/a46r091.htm>.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
10
Older persons should be able to participate in determining when and at what pace
withdrawal from the labour force takes place.
Older persons should have access to appropriate educational and training programmes.
Older persons should be able to live in environments that are safe and adaptable to personal
preferences and changing capacities.
Older persons should be able to reside at home for as long as possible.
3.3.2 Participation:
Older persons should remain integrated in society, participate actively in the formulation
and implementation of policies that directly affect their well-being, and share their
knowledge and skills with younger generations.
Older persons should be able to seek and develop opportunities for service to the
community, and to serve as volunteers in positions appropriate to their interests and
capabilities.
Older persons should be able to form movements or associations of older persons.
3.3.3 Care:
Older persons should benefit from family and community care and protection in accordance
with each society's system of cultural values.
Older persons should have access to health care to help them to maintain or regain the
optimum level of physical, mental, and emotional well-being and to prevent or delay the
onset of illness.
Older persons should have access to social and legal services to enhance their autonomy,
protection, and care.
Older persons should be able to utilize appropriate levels of institutional care providing
protection, rehabilitation, and social and mental stimulation in a humane and secure
environment.
Older persons should be able to enjoy human rights and fundamental freedoms when
residing in any shelter, care or treatment facility, including full respect for their dignity,
beliefs, needs, and privacy and for the right to make decisions about their care and the
quality of their lives.
3.3.4 Self-fulfilment:
Older persons should be able to pursue opportunities for the full development of their
potential.
Older persons should have access to the educational, cultural, spiritual, and recreational
resources of society.
3.3.5 Dignity:
Older persons should be able to live in dignity and security, and be free of exploitation and
physical or mental abuse.
Older persons should be treated fairly regardless of age, gender, racial or ethnic background,
disability or other status, and be valued independently of their economic contribution.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
11
The Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing reaffirmed and elaborated the UN Principles, with
particular focus on the protection of human rights, elimination of age discrimination, and promotion
of the right to work, health, and participation by the elderly. It articulates 35 objectives for elderly
persons, including9:
Recognising the social, cultural, economic and political contribution of older persons;
Creating opportunities for older persons to participate in decision-making processes at all
levels;
Creating employment opportunities for all older persons who want to work;
Improving living conditions and infrastructure in rural areas;
Alleviating the marginalisation of older persons in rural areas;
Integrating older migrants within their new communities;
Ensuring equality of opportunity throughout life with respect to continuing education,
training and retraining, as well as vocational guidance and placement services;
Fully utilizing the potential and expertise of persons of all ages, recognizing the benefits of
increased experience with age;
Strengthening of solidarity through equity and reciprocity between generations;
Reducing poverty among older persons;
Promoting programmes to enable all workers to acquire basic social security, including
where applicable, pensions, disability insurance and health benefits;
Providing a sufficient minimum income for all older persons, paying particular attention to
socially and economically disadvantaged groups;
Ensuring equal access by older persons to food, shelter, medical care and other services
during and after natural disasters and other humanitarian emergencies;
Enhancing the contributions of older persons to the reestablishment and reconstruction of
communities and the rebuilding of the social fabric following emergencies;
Reducing the cumulative effects of factors that increase the risk of disease and consequently
potential dependence of the elderly;
Developing policies to prevent ill-health among senior citizens;
Ensuring all older persons have access to food and adequate nutrition;
Eliminating social and economic inequalities based on age, gender or any other ground,
including linguistic barriers, to ensure that older persons have universal and equal access to
health care;
Strengthening of primary health-care services to meet the needs of older persons and
promote their inclusion in the process;
Developing a continuum of health care to meet the needs of older persons;
Involving older persons in the development and strengthening of primary and long-term
care services;
Improving the assessment of the impact of HIV/AIDS on the health of older persons, both for
those who are infected and those who are caregivers for infected or surviving family
members;
Providing adequate information, training in care-giving skills, treatment, medical care and
social support to older persons living with HIV/AIDS and their caregivers;
9 United Nations. Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing: Second World Assembly on
Ageing. New York, 2002. < http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Madrid_plan.pdf>.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
12
Enhancing and recognising the contribution of older persons to development in their role as
caregivers for children with chronic diseases, including HIV/AIDS, and as surrogate parents;
Providing improved information and training for health professionals and para-professionals
on the needs of older persons;
Developing comprehensive mental health-care services ranging from prevention to early
intervention, the provision of treatment services and the management of mental health
problems in older persons;
Maintaining maximum functional capacity throughout the life course and promotion of the
full participation of older persons with disabilities;
Promoting “ageing in place” in the community with due regard to individual preferences and
affordable housing options for older persons;
Improving housing and environmental design to promote independent living by taking into
account the needs of older persons in particular those with disabilities;
Improving the availability of accessible and affordable transportation for older persons;
Providing a continuum of care and services for older persons from various sources and
support for caregivers;
Supporting the care-giving role of older persons, particularly older women;
Eliminating all forms of neglect, abuse and violence of older persons;
Creating support services to address abuse of the elderly; and,
Enhancing public recognition of the authority, wisdom, productivity and other important
contributions of older persons.
These objectives, and the UN Principles on which they are founded, underpin the Minimum
Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities that follow.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
13
4. SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS OF ELDERLY RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES IN
GUYANA
The site visits to the sample of homes for the elderly and engagements with key stakeholders and
duty bearers uncovered common themes that influence the operations of elderly residential care
facilities across Guyana.
First, stakeholders almost unanimously agree that this exercise to develop minimum standards to
govern the operations of elderly residential facilities is grossly overdue. The lack of regulation of the
sector leads to the emergence of facilities being run by charitable organisations and individuals that
are moved to try to help elderly in need of care but have neither the resources, training or
experience required to successfully provide quality care to older persons. While the goodwill of
these organisations and individuals is commended, the State must put systems in place to ensure
that the care provided to older persons respect their person, dignity, privacy, and identity.
Secondly, duty bearers are generally unable to provide a definitive list of functioning facilities and
basic details of the operations of those facilities. This is due in large part to the registration of
facilities under the Friendly Societies Act without any required form of licensing or accreditation by
the Social Services Department of the MoSP. This is exacerbated by a lack of resources and
inadequate mechanisms within the MoSP to monitor the work and regulate the groups registered
under the Friendly Societies Act.
Thirdly, there is no established procedure for the inspection and regulation of the facilities. None of
the kitchen facilities have been certified by the sanitation and health authorities (only a few of the
facilities have ever had a health inspection at all), and there are only a handful of cooks with valid
Food Handler’s Certificates. Moreover, while a social worker visits the facilities to distribute
pensions, there is no system for providing ongoing psychosocial or welfare services to residents
outside of the government-run Palms. There is also no established process through the government
system to address complaints or issues of abuse within the homes, as a last option for recourse if an
issue is unsatisfactorily addressed by the facility.
Finally, the operation of elderly residential facilities in Guyana is symptomatic of the deteriorating
culture within the society and lack of regard for the contributions, capacity, and rights of the elderly.
Many of the facilities felt like a place for older persons to go to die instead of like a home away from
home. All of the homes reported challenges engaging families on the welfare of their elderly in care,
and too many of the care assistants observed lacked the personality and interpersonal skills
necessary to effectively and professionally care for the elderly.
4.1 Infrastructure
Safe, clean and appropriate infrastructure is a key element in the provision of quality care to
residents in elderly care facilities. The layout of a building informs the type of residents that can be
accommodated (ambulatory or physically disabled), the flow of operations of the facility, the type of
systems required for efficient communication, and the mechanisms required to protect the safety
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
14
and security of residents. It also has a considerable impact on the feel of the building and can help to
create a vibrant, engaging environment for residents.
The physical conditions of the homes visited vary significantly. Some, like the Sister’s Missionary of
Charity and St. Thomas Moore Men’s Homestead are in excellent condition and appear to be well
maintained. They are clean, residents are visibly comfortable, and there are no signs of any issues
that would cause authorities to label the buildings unfit for use. Others, like Holy Family, are poorly
maintained, with inadequate lighting, small and unclean bathrooms, and deplorable kitchen
facilities.
Importantly, many of the residential facilities that exist were not originally designed to
accommodate the elderly. They are essentially homes that have been adapted to serve the elderly,
without sufficient consideration for the space, layout and type of structure required to respect the
privacy and needs of the residents, staff, and visitors. For example, none of the multi-storeyed
facilities visited have elevators or stair lifts to accommodate residents who may be unable to
traverse steps or to do so with ease. Only some of the facilities have sufficient, easily accessible
recreational spaces on each wing or storey, and only two have wheel-chair accessible baths and are
outfitted with non-skid tiles. Additionally, none have plumbed hot and cold water (a necessity and
not a luxury when caring for the elderly), and only a few have secured windows throughout the
building and grab bars in the bathrooms.
All of the facilities are especially dearth of mechanisms for efficient and effective emergency
management. A few have marked exits, smoke detectors, sprinklers, fire extinguishers or sand
buckets (none have all five), and only one has fire escapes. There are also no formal emergency
plans, established mechanisms for evacuation of residents in times of crisis, or emergency lighting in
stairwells and hallways. Additionally, none of the facilities visited have directional signs or posters
outlining emergency posters or procedures. This is of grave concern since many of the buildings are
wooden structures and, save floods and drought, Guyana’s biggest hazard risk is fire. As they are
currently operating, the potential for catastrophic loss of life during an emergency situation is high.
Furthermore, none of the facilities have buzzers in the rooms or on the person of the residents to
allow a resident to signal that there is an emergency and he/she is in need of assistance. There are
also no intercom or video monitoring systems in place, and no mechanisms to allow staff to readily
communicate with each other without having to walk across the facility or make a cellular phone
call.
The inadequacies of the infrastructure of many of the elderly residential facilities are not limited to
the building they occupy, but also include the furnishings in the building. At the Palms, residents
were seen precariously perched in plastic chairs that were neither comfortable or safe. PCAs in some
of the wards even told stories of residents falling out of those chairs as they often break or skid. In
other cases, the furniture generally include sofas and accent chairs, but they are visibly dated.
The physical inadequacies also extend to the immediate environs of the facility. Those located in
urban communities within the capital city often do not have adequate yard space for outdoor
physical, social, and recreation activities, and many of those that do have considerable yard space
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
15
have not developed and maintained those spaces. In fact, except for the Palms and Sister’s
Missionary of Charity, none of the facilities had benches or zones on the facility grounds to
encourage reading, discussions among residents, or relaxation.
That aside, as the Government-run facility, the condition of the physical facilities of the Palms
deserves special mention. There is no denying that considerable work has been undertaken to
improve the facility. A new laundry building and recreational room have been built, the grounds
have been developed and are well maintained, exit signs (not lit) have been installed, and there have
been minor repairs to the building. However, a walkthrough of the facility suggests that the Palms
has likely reached the point of diminishing returns, where additional investment to upgrade the
current infrastructure will yield increasingly less benefit and minimal value for money. Having been
constructed some 142 years ago, the bones and foundation of the building are deteriorating, the
plumbing is outdated, and the structure is rotting. The ward-style accommodations do not respect
the dignity or privacy of the residents; there are no elevators or stair lifts even though there are
three storeys in each of the buildings; there is little recreational, closet, and storage space and no
designated staff quarters on each ward; there are holes in the walls which encourage an influx of
stray animals and rodents; and the mini-kitchens in the wards are unfit for the serving of food. What
is sure is that the Palms does not set a standard for other facilities to follow or demonstrate the
Government of Guyana’s stated commitment of serving the elderly.
4.2 Finances
All of the facilities visited share a common experience: whether owned and managed by the
Government, a church or an NGO, and despite differences in number and characteristics of
residents, all of the facilities are underfinanced and under-resourced. Most facilities require some
payment from residents, but many residents are behind on their payments and themselves only earn
a meagre monthly pension. This lack of a robust cost structure within the homes is exacerbated by
the absence of consistent support from families and little, if any, support from Government—those
homes that receive a Government subvention report that the annual contribution is only $40,000 (or
$3,333.33 a month).
Many homes thus complement their income with donations from NGOs, churches, the private
sector, and private individuals. However, these contributions are sporadic and insufficient to have a
noticeable impact on the facilities’ finances. The result is many homes are forced to continue to
accommodate residents despite lack of payment, which over time leads to a dilution of the services
that the home can provide, retardation of the number and quality of staff that can be engaged, and
ultimately, a reduction in the quality of care delivered to residents.
Importantly, while some of the facilities follow established accounting practices in the collection and
use of donations, many do not, and only a few facilities have audited accounts. Furthermore, only
some of the facilities have planned budgets that can be compared with actual expenditure for a
financial analysis, signalling a lack of financial forecasting and planning within the facilities.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
16
4.3 Operations
All of the facilities visited allow residents to have visitors; encourage the active participation of
families, where available, in the care of the elderly; and allow residents to retain basic storage and
personal items. There are established visiting hours and, at a few of the homes, procedures for
leaving and entering the facility that allow the administration to provide information re last known
whereabouts to authorities in emergency situations. In addition, while none of the homes except the
Palms have an assigned social worker to support the admissions process or handle other
psychosocial and welfare issues, the social worker from the Palms goes to the private homes
monthly to distribute pensions to the residents.
A few of the homes have regular, planned, social and recreational activities for residents, including
concerts, movie and game nights, birthday celebrations, and library visits. The other facilities
generally have no programmes, often because of a dearth of funding and a lack of interest among
residents in homes that target able-bodied persons. None of the facilities organise physical activities
for residents, although the residents of the St. Thomas Moore Men’s Homestead organise exercise
programmes on their own. In some cases, residents are involved in day-to-day activities at the home
(like distributing meals, locking windows, updating the notice board, etc), but most are generally left
to look at television, talk with friends or visitors, or stay in bed for much of the day.
Only one of the facilities has a published meals calendar and involve residents in the creation of the
menu. In most cases, residents are required to eat whatever is prepared, and there are many
complaints of unpalatable and nutritionally unbalanced meals being provided. On a few of the visits,
cooked food was improperly stored and unhygienically moved from the kitchen to the food
distribution area/dining room in the facility. Additionally, snacks are seldom provided and there are
only a few cases where residents have easy, 24-hour access to potable water.
4.4 Human Resources
Interestingly, staff challenges have been identified as the biggest hindrance to quality care at the
homes. There is general agreement among stakeholders that most of the persons that apply to jobs
related to caring for the elderly lack the interpersonal skills and personality necessary to navigate
the myriad of ways that persons age. In fact, while some were genuinely interested in their work and
passionate about caring for the elderly, most of the staff interviewed admitted that they applied to
and accepted their job offers because they needed a consistent salary. Sadly, the prospects of
attracting better-suited candidates are slim, because of the salary and benefit packages offered
(especially at the private homes).
This lack of soft skills and interest among staff is compounded by poor training. The more popular
Care for the Elderly Courses do not sufficiently equip students to serve as personal care assistants,
and there is weak uptake of the MoPH and MoSP programmes that are tailored to training certified
PCAs. Moreover, none of the facilities have orientation programmes and job aides for staff, and few
have made efforts to encourage and facilitate the continued education of their staff.
That said, the human resource issues at the residential care facilities are not only about the quality
of staff—the staffing process and working environment of all of the homes are deficient. None of the
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
17
homes have firm, established criteria (education, training, and experience) for the varying staff
positions within the facility, and only a few have clearly articulated disciplinary and grievance
processes for staff. Few perform background checks during the interview process and only one of
the facilities visited conduct regular, formal performance appraisals. Many do not have sufficient
staff, with one facility having no one at all and another having 1 PCA to as many as 35 residents.
Finally, some have irregular working hours, none have functional OHS committees, only a few have
properly outfitted staff quarters, and none require the staff to have regular health inspections or be
up to date on their vaccinations, thereby placing both the residents and staff at risk for contracting
communicable diseases.
4.5 Management
As per local law, elderly residential facilities in Guyana are registered under the Friendly Societies Act
and are governed by rules that are developed and submitted for approval during the registration
process. However, while there are written rules that address the governance of the facilities, the
rules are generally not sufficiently elaborated to be used as guides for the operation of the homes.
This results in a vacuum of established norms, core values, and documented standard operating
procedures in many of the facilities.
Still, all of the facilities visited and administrators of homes engaged confirmed that there are
established criteria for the admission of persons to the facility. These criteria generally include age
(60 and above), a recent medical, ability to care for self, and need. Exceptions to these criteria are
rare and usually involve cases where facilities are equipped to care for sick patients or where
persons age 18 – 59 are unable to care for themselves, have no familial support network, and/or
aged out of the Child Protection System or an orphanage.
In addition to the absence of an operations manual for the facility, most of the homes also do not
have documented guidelines for residents that outline the care to be provided, process for making
complaints, expected behaviours, etc. In fact, of the facilities visited, only one require residents to
review and sign a contract upon admission to the facility and two have documented house rules that
are given to each resident. Moreover, while some hold weekly or monthly house meetings and one
has a resident representative that raises resident issues with the facilities’ administration, none have
established complaint mechanisms.
4.6 Health Care
Of the facilities visited, the Palms Geriatric Facility, Sister’s Missionary of Charity, and Uncle Eddie’s
Home are the only facilities with bedridden residents. Of these, the Palms is the only one with an
onsite doctor, nurse and medices. One of the sisters at Sister’s Missionary of Charity has been
trained as a nurse, while Uncle Eddie’s has doctors on call in case of emergencies. Moreover, Uncle
Eddie’s, like many of the other homes, has developed a partnership with the Ministry of Public
Health that sees medical teams from the neighbourhood health centres visiting the homes monthly
to check and support the continued good health of residents in care.
The challenges providing regular, quality health care to residents is compounded by the specialised
nature of the medical attention required by the elderly. The MoPH reports that 8 of every 10 deaths
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
18
among the elderly are due to non-communicable diseases, but there are little or no mechanisms for
health education and decreasing risks to these diseases within the homes. Additionally, while all of
the homes visited require a medical as part of the admission process, it is unclear how much these
medicals are used to inform the care delivered to residents beyond adjustments to the menu to
cater for residents that suffer with diabetes or hypertension. In fact, none of the homes have formal
care plans for the residents and only one of the facilities check to ensure that residents have
received all of their vaccinations.
Only a few of the homes visited have PCAs that can deliver CPR and none of the facilities require
PCAs to have received CPR certification. In fact, only a few of the homes have certified care
assistants and so PCAs generally only help to clean and feed residents, as well as aid residents with
their medication (often for diabetes or hypertension) in accordance with doctor’s orders. In some
cases, however, PCAs support the administration of more involved medical care even though they
have no formal medical training and are unqualified to handle or administer medications.
At best, some of the facilities have a small first aid kit on the premises, but most have none at all.
There is also improper disposal of sharp implements, and inconsistent use of safety and protective
gear, like gloves, masks, hairnets, etc.
4.7 Actors in the Elderly Residential Care Sub-Sector
A multiplicity of actors support the work and operations of residential care facilities. Their
involvement has been through established mechanisms, though these mechanisms have not evolved
to respond to emerging local realities and are not based on an established standard. The critical
actors are depicted in Figure 4 below:
Figure 4: Actors in the Elderly Residential Care Sub-Sector
•Palms Geriatric Facility • St. Joseph's Home
•Archer's Senior Citizen's Home • Uncle Eddie's Home
•Demerara Paradise Inc - Nursing Home and Medical Services • Holy Family Home
•Homestead of St. Vincent De Paul • Ivy Hall Memorial Home
• Byer's Senior Citizen's Home • Gentle Women's Home
• St. Thoman Moore Men's Home • New Nazareth Home
•Salvation Army Ladies Senior Citizen Home • Sister's Missionary of Charity
Elderly Care Facilities
•Ministry of Social Protection • National Commission of the Family
•Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation (GPHC) • Ministry of Public Health
•National Commission of the Elderly • Regional Democratic Councils
Government
•Private Hospitals and Medical Facilities • Pharmacies
•Banks DIH • John Fernandes Limited
•Courts • Private Individuals
Private Sector
•Food for the Poor • Donor Agencies
•Bethel Gospel Hall • Mother's Union
•Guyana Pensioner's Association • Trade Unions
•Religious Organisations • Ladies of Charity
•Guyana Chest Society
NGOs/Charities
•University of Guyana - Institute of Distance and Continuing Education • St. John's College
•Guyana Red Cross Society • Venezuelan Institute
Academia/Training Institutions
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
19
5. PROPOSED MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ELDERLY RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES IN GUYANA
The minimum standards for elderly residential facilities that follow consider and respect the
Government of Guyana’s responsibility to care for the elderly as per its international commitment
under the United Nations Principles for Older Persons and the Madrid International Plan of Action on
Ageing. These standards are the result of a facilitated, consultative process with key sector
stakeholders and duty bearers, and have been amalgamated with recognised international best
practices.
The proposed minimum standards are aimed at establishing a framework that respects the privacy,
dignity, person, individuality, and rights of the residents that occupy these care facilities. The goal is
to ensure that older persons are respected; treated equally, fairly and with dignity; live a productive
life; are in contact with those dear to them; are involved in the making of decisions that affect their
lives; and receive quality care in a comfortable and secure environment.
PROPOSED MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR ELDERLY RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITIES
1. Elderly residential care facilities have a documented and publically available admissions policy.
2. Residents’ human rights are respected and maintained within the facility.
3. There is an established procedure to receive, act upon, and respond to complaints from residents or
their sponsors and advocates.
4. Every resident and prospective resident has ready access to information required for informed decision-
making.
5. Residents of elderly residential facilities are consulted on the care they require and desire.
6. Residents’ are encouraged to retain and continually develop their self identity, and their personal
belongings are safeguarded.
7. Residents are encouraged to participate in the day-to-day operations of the facility.
8. Residents receive social care that fosters their productivity and encourages active ageing.
9. Residents receive sensitive and personalised care to retain and encourage their physical well-being.
10. Residents are provided safely prepared, nutritious, and palatable meals that they enjoy.
11. Elderly residential facilities promote the health of residents in care.
12. Elderly residential facilities source, store and administer medicines in accordance with best practices
and local laws and regulations.
13. Elderly residential facilities strive to continuously provide a high standard of care to residents.
14. Elderly residential facilities are staffed as necessary to provide quality services to residents.
15. Human resource issues are handled in accordance with established professional best practices and local
laws and regulations.
16. The physical infrastructure of elderly residential facilities are designed and maintained to cater to the
special needs of the elderly.
17. Elderly residential facilities have established procedures to prepare for and respond to emergencies, so
as to protect the life, health, and liberty of their staff and residents.
18. Elderly residential facilities dispose of waste in an environmentally-friendly manner and in accordance
with local laws and regulations.
19. Standard accounting and financial systems are adopted to ensure the continued viability of the facility.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
20
The expected practices of each of these standards are elaborated below.
Expected Practices:
The facility has an established and well articulated admissions policy and process that
considers the requirements of this Minimum Standard as well as any legal or licensing
requirements. Information about the policy and process are publically available.
Admissions to residential care facilities are generally based on age (60 and above), social or
housing need, medical condition, and indigence. A person below sixty (60) years of age is
only admitted to the facility in extraordinary circumstances where the admission of that
person is the only humane course of action.
A social worker, assigned from the State Authority or employed by the facility, is involved in
the admissions process. The social worker reviews and investigates the information in the
admission application, and confirms that the request for admission is not based on a need
that can be met by another social safety net (like public assistance or familial support).
Once the admission of the resident has been approved, the facility collects key emergency
information, including coordinates for the emergency contact (and next of kin, if they differ),
and details about any allergies, physical limitations or special needs of the resident.
Expected Practices:
Elderly residential facilities respect, maintain, and protect the human rights articulated in
the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the United Nations in 1948.10
Staff of the facility demonstrate awareness of and respect for the rights of residents in their
deportment, behaviour, mode and style of communication, and dress.
The residents’ right to choose is respected by the facility. This is maintained even when the
facility disagrees with the decision or choice made by the resident (or his/her
sponsor/advocate where appropriate).
Care practices are personalised to respond to the needs, preferences, and changing
capacities of residents.
Residents’ have timely access to quality health care, in or out of the facility.
10
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris, 1948. <http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf >.
STANDARD 2: RIGHTS
Residents’ human rights are respected and maintained within the facility.
STANDARD 1: ADMISSIONS
Elderly residential care facilities have a documented and publically available admissions policy.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
21
Arrangements are in place to ensure residents’ privacy and dignity are respected at all times.
Special attention is paid to discussions about sensitive topics (including illness and medical
treatment); entering bathrooms and bedrooms; dressing and undressing; residents having
their own clothing; assistance to eat, drink and maintain good personal hygiene; sexual
expressions; and care provided during illness and at the time of death.
A screen that ensures the protection of residents’ privacy is used if more than one resident
shares a room.
Residents are allowed to communicate with family and friends, and participate in
community activities and hobbies (unless that participation hinders the safety of that or
other residents or the facility).
Residents are allowed to receive mail at the facility. Mail for residents are unopened and
promptly delivered.
Residents are free to participate in the political process and that involvement is facilitated by
the facility.
Policies and mechanisms are established to protect residents from physical, sexual,
psychological, financial and material abuse, as well as neglect. These policies and
mechanisms address abuse prevention as well as the reporting, investigation, and handing
of abuse complaints.
Residents are free to discharge themselves from the facility at any time, provided that they
have met their financial obligations to the facility.
Expected Practices:
The facility promotes a culture of openness and partnership that encourages residents,
sponsors and advocates to raise issues or file complaints without fear of consequence.
The facility encourages residents, sponsors and advocates to raise issues directly with the
personal care assistants and move up the chain of command if the response at any level is
unsatisfactory.
The facility’s complaints procedure is elaborated in the Resident Handbook, included in staff
orientation and training programmes, and prominently displayed within the facility. The
facility includes any recourse available with the State as the final tier of the complaints
procedure.
STANDARD 3: COMPLAINTS
There is an established procedure to receive, act upon, and respond to complaints from
residents or their sponsors and advocates.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
22
Details of the complaint, response, resulting action, and status are documented in the
resident’s file.
Expected Practices
The admissions policy and process, as well as the facility’s cost structure (including due dates
and fees for any activities or services that carry additional costs), are outlined in all
marketing material (including brochures and websites) and provided to all prospective
residents.
Elderly residential facilities host Open Houses to allow prospective residents and their
sponsors to visit the facility before making a decision to stay. These Open Houses include a
tour of the facility as well as opportunities to interact with residents and staff.
A Resident Handbook (in English and Braille for visually-impaired persons) is provided to
every resident and prospective resident. Inter alia, this guide includes a description of the
services provided and activities planned by the facility, the established complaints process
(including any Government recourse available), the core values that govern the operation of
the facility, visiting hours and conditions, curfew times and the details of any check-in
procedures, a description of the physical layout and accommodations of the facility, the
emergency procedures of the facility, the general staff to resident ratio, an outline of
circumstances under which residents may be expelled from the facility, the general
procedures adopted in the case of illness or death of a resident, and the process and terms
of discharge of a resident. Within seven (7) days of receiving the Handbook, residents sign a
simple contract to confirm receipt of the Handbook and indicate understanding of and
agreement to adhere to the terms articulated therein.
Information necessary for residents to make informed decisions is provided at the earliest
opportunity and presented in a manner (language and format) that he/she can understand.
Residents have access to radio and television programmes and newspapers.
A notice board within the facility highlights information about upcoming activities and
events, and reminders about important announcements.
Expected Practices
Residents and prospective residents are presumed to be capable of making informed
decisions in the absence of evidence to the contrary. When there is evidence to the
STANDARD 4: ACCESS TO INFORMATION
Every resident and prospective resident has ready access to information required for informed
decision-making.
STANDARD 5: CONSULTATION AND CONSENT
Residents of elderly residential facilities are consulted on the care they require and desire.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
23
contrary, the sponsor or an advocate appointed by the State Authority is engaged in
decision-making about the care to be provided to the resident. The sponsor or the advocate
takes the resident’s past wishes, needs, changing capacities, preferences, well-being, and
religious convictions into account when making decisions on the resident’s behalf.
Upon admission, every resident and, where appropriate, sponsors or advocates are involved
in the development of a care plan that informs the resident’s stay at the facility. The care
plan to be developed outlines the procedure for attaining consent for any treatment or care
not addressed in the plan, and the actions to be taken when consent has not been provided.
Once the care plan is developed and agreed upon with the resident (or his/her advocate), a
representative of the facility and the resident (or his/her advocate) sign to signal their
agreement with the terms set out in the plan. If the resident’s wishes re care change, the
care plan is amended, and again signed and dated by both parties.
The resident, his/her sponsor or advocate where appropriate, Personal Care Assistants and
other persons providing care to the residents have access to the care plan.
In medical, residential care facilities, consent is sought and documented for care or
treatment not addressed in the care plan. Standard consent forms are developed for this
purpose and the signed forms maintained in the resident’s file. The resident, or his/her
advocate or sponsor, is provided with information and explanations required to allow for
informed decision-making at the earliest possible opportunity.
Residents (or their advocates) decide what steps are to be taken in instances of illness and
death, in accordance with national laws, regulations, and customs. These steps are outlined
and agreed to in the individual care plan developed.
Residents, their sponsors or advocates, and the facility discusses the individual terms and
process for discharge, and these details are reflected in the care plan.
Consent is sought from the sponsor or advocate, and reflected in the care plan, for a
resident incapable of identifying his/herself to be fitted with an identifying bracelet or other
means of identification that cannot be removed or easily lost.
Expected Practices
Residents’ individual choices of address are respected at all times.
Residents are allowed to maintain and respectfully express their personal identity within the
facility.
STANDARD 6: IDENTITY, INDEPENDENCE, AND PERSONAL BELONGINGS
Residents’ are encouraged to retain and continually develop their self identity, and their
personal belongings are safeguarded.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
24
Residents’ social, religious, and cultural norms are respected and reasonably accommodated
within the daily routines of the facility.
There is a policy and culture of fostering and maximising residents’ independence.
Residents (or their advocates) decide what information is to be shared about their stay at
the facility, and indicate with whom that information is to be shared. This is captured in the
care plan developed.
Residents handle their own financial affairs for as long as they desire, and decide how their
finances will be handled thereafter.
Elderly residential facilities avoid collecting and managing residents’ monies. When this
cannot be avoided, detailed, signed records are maintained of all monies received and
handed over.
Residents are allowed and encouraged to bring a reasonable volume of personal items
(including clothing, bath and personal care supplies, and storage units) to the facility.
Upon request from a resident, the facility stores documents and personal effects for
safekeeping only if said documents and effects are kept in a safe or locked room in the
facility, and signed records of the receipt and handover all items in storage are maintained.
If a resident dies while at the facility, all of his/her possessions are handed over to the next
of kin on file. Where there is no next of kin on file, the possessions of the residents are
lodged with the State.
Expected Practices:
There are established mechanisms to allow residents to raise issues about and contribute
ideas for the enhancement of the day-to-day functioning of the facility. This might include
the establishment of a Resident Representative Committee that supports the planning of
recreational and social events within the facility, and raises issues of common concern
among residents with the administration of the facility. Ideas presented and issues raised by
residents are acknowledged and responded to, and a record of the issue and the resulting
action taken is maintained.
The involvement of residents in the day-to-day operations of the facility is not for the
convenience of the facility or to fill staff gaps, but is geared towards respecting the
independence and fostering the participation of residents in their care.
While resident participation in the day-to-day operations and activities of the facility is
encouraged, the right to choose is respected and maintained. Residents are given the choice
to opt out of any and all individual and/or communal social and recreational activities.
STANDARD 7: PARTICIPATION
Residents are encouraged to participate in the day-to-day operations of the facility.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
25
Resident involvement in the day-to-day operations of the facility (meal distribution, opening
and closing of windows, etc) is only encouraged and permitted when it does not endanger
the health and safety of that or other residents or the security of the facility.
Expected Practices:
At a minimum, the facility plans biweekly social and recreational activities for residents. Such
activities might include, inter alia, movie or games nights, tours, concerts, fashion shows,
and book club meetings.
The facility provides opportunities for exercise and physical activity, on or off site, at least
three times a week.
Residents’ relationships with their families are encouraged and fostered.
Residents are allowed to receive visitors during established visiting hours and choose who
he/she wishes to see. Residents choices are respected and recorded.
Residents’ rights to access telephone and internet services are respected and, where
possible, facilitated.
Residents receive required psychosocial and welfare services from a social worker attached
to the facility or dispatched by the State Authority.
Expected Practices:
There are a sufficient number of staff on call to assist residents with the activities of daily
living.
Staff aid residents with grooming and meals as is necessary or agreed in the care plans to
maintain residents’ hygiene and physical well-being.
The facility is outfitted with the necessary equipment to meet residents’ mobility needs.
Residents receive support from staff based on their individual needs, changing capacities,
wishes, and preferences.
Staff provide support to residents sensitively, respectfully, professionally, and discreetly.
STANDARD 9: PHYSICAL CARE
Residents receive sensitive and personalised care to retain and encourage their physical well-
being.
STANDARD 8: SOCIAL CARE
Residents receive social care that fosters their productivity and encourages active ageing.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
26
The health, safety, and comfort of persons in care are checked on regularly.
Expected Practices
Residents are involved, as desired and as is safe, in meal planning, meal preparation, food
service, and related activities.
A weekly meal calendar is displayed within the facility so that residents know the options
that will be available at each meal.
Residents are entitled to and receive a minimum of three complete meals per day.
Nutritious snacks are provided to residents as can reasonably be expected.
Residents have access to a variety of fluids (hot and cold) and 24 hour access to potable
water.
Residents are provided with a balanced diet, and allergies and individual ailments are
considered in food preparation and handling.
There is a nutritionist on staff at the facility. Where this is not possible or practically feasible,
the facility arranges ongoing nutrition training for relevant staff, and work with the Ministry
of Health and other Government Authorities to ensure nutritious and tasty meals that are
hygienically prepared are provided to each resident.
Every person involved in the preparation of meals has a current Food Handlers’ Certificate
and is appropriately trained for the roles they assume.
Food is transported to residents in a manner that considers and respects the dignity and
rights of residents, and adheres to public health food hygienic standards.
Staff responsible for the preparation and delivery of food wear appropriate protective and
safety gear.
Expected Practices
Elderly residential facilities require prospective residents to have their health assessed as
part of the admissions process.
The facility provides opportunities for residents to pursue healthy lifestyle choices and
recreational activities.
STANDARD 11: HEALTH CARE
Elderly residential facilities promote the health of residents in care.
STANDARD 10: FOOD OPTIONS, PREPARATION AND HANDLING
Residents have access to safely prepared, nutritious, palatable meals that they enjoy.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
27
Residents have regular access to counselling and other required psychosocial support
services.
The facility aids the resident’s access to quality health services by having qualified medical
persons in house or facilitating regular visits from a neighbourhood health authority.
The facility maintains records of fundamental medical information (including basic vital
statistics, blood pressure, and blood glucose levels) as required to reflect changes in the
resident’s health during his/her stay at the facility.
The facility is equipped with basic medical implements (like a BP machine, oxygen tanks, and
blood sugar kits).
Only persons appropriately trained and certified should administer medical care (including
CPR).
Expected Practices
Residents of the facility have the right to keep, manage, and self-administer medication
approved by professionals and local and international law for self-administration. If required
or requested, assistance with the administration of this category of medication is provided
by a duly certified Personal Care Assistant. All other medication, including scheduled
controlled drugs, is administered by a qualified nurse or other medical professional.
First aid kits are properly stocked, maintained, and located in readily accessible areas across
the facility’s premises.
The facility is stocked with adequate medication for the needs of residents in care. An
account of all medication procured and administered by the facility is maintained.
Medications are stored in clean and secure conditions, in accordance with international best
practices and local laws, regulations, and customs.
All errors and incidents in the acquisition, storage, and administration of drugs are
documented.
A record of all medications and medical care provided within the facility is documented and
kept in the residents’ files. Adverse reactions to medications are also noted.
STANDARD 12: MEDICATION MANAGEMENT
Elderly residential facilities source, store, and administer medicines in accordance with best
practices and local laws and regulations.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
28
Expected Practices
There is a clearly articulated policy that governs the management and operation of the
facility. This policy sets out the framework for the Resident and Employee Handbooks, and is
a requirement for obtaining the necessary license to operate.
The core values espoused in the abovementioned policy are prominently displayed within
the facility, and are included in the Resident and Employee Handbooks.
The facility prominently displays a copy of its valid license in the reception/waiting area.
The facility accommodates inspection visits from State Authorities as outlined in licensing
regulations.
The facility undertakes an independent, quality audit at least once every three years. The
facility demonstrates how it has addressed the issues raised by and implemented the
recommendations of the audit.
Employees have job aides that, inter alia, include key reminders, tools, and measures of
success for the job to be performed.
Feedback is sought from residents, sponsors, and advocates, and incorporated into the
facility’s operations.
The facility collects, manages, and analyses data (like number of illnesses, deaths and
accidents; occupancy rates; and resident satisfaction statistics) to facilitate informed
decision-making about and continuous improvement of the services offered.
Video monitoring systems are installed in common areas within the facility. The presence of
these video recording systems is communicated to staff and residents, and tapes are kept
for at least six months.
Expected Practices
There is at least one patient care assistant on call for every five residents in the facility.
At least one floor supervisor, preferably with some medical training, is present to oversee
the work of every fifteen personal care assistants.
STANDARD 14: STAFFING LEVELS AND REQUIREMENTS
Elderly residential facilities are staffed as necessary to provide quality services to residents.
STANDARD 13: QUALITY ASSURANCE
Elderly residential facilities strive to continuously provide a high standard of care to residents.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
29
All staff hired as patient care assistants have completed an accredited patient care assistant
training programme (that includes CPR).
The Administrator of the facility has been trained by the Ministry of Social Protection and/or
the University of Guyana.
The Administrator of the facility has the personality, deportment, and temperament
necessary to manage an elderly residential care facility, and demonstrates the training and
experience required to competently run the facility.
Employees have the personality and temperament necessary to work at a residential care
facility, and demonstrate the training and experience required to provide quality care to
elderly residents.
Expected Practices
The facility has a clear and independent recruitment process that does not discriminate
against job applicants and employees because of race, colour, religious beliefs, political
affiliation, age, disability, gender, sexual orientation or nationality.
Comprehensive background and reference checks are completed before job applicants are
hired.
Prospective staff are required to prove that they have received and are up-to-date on all of
their vaccinations.
The facility has a robust orientation programme in place for all new staff.
The facility provides a safe, clean, and healthy work environment for staff.
The facility provides clean, well lit, well ventilated, and appropriately furnished staff quarters
for staff meals, wardrobe changes, storage, and other use.
At a minimum, all staff receive employment benefits in accordance with local laws and
regulations.
Staff have binding contracts that govern their terms of employment. These contracts are
supported by an Employee Handbook that, inter alia, addresses conditions of employment,
working hours, promotion conditions, leave benefits, and the handling of overtime.
There are clear disciplinary and appeals procedures for violations of the terms and
conditions of employment. These procedures are documented in the Employee Handbook.
STANDARD 15: HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
Human resource issues are handled in accordance with established professional best practices
and local laws and regulations.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
30
Employee grievances are handled promptly, formally, and directly. The grievance process is
elaborated in the Employee Handbook.
The facility has a clearly defined organisational structure that specifies roles and
responsibilities, and identifies the lines of authority and accountability.
The facility maintains comprehensive staff files, that are easily accessible by the
administrator for effective management of all staff.
There is an active Occupational Health and Safety Committee at the facility.
Staff are provided with the equipment and tools and are encouraged to adopt working
practices that minimise risk to health and safety.
Staff are provided with the information, supervision, and instruction necessary to protect
the health and safety of the residents and staff of the facility.
Continuous training and education activities are encouraged, facilitated, and when possible,
initiated by the management of the facility.
All staff are appropriately attired while at work. They wear uniforms so that they can be
easily identified.
The facility has an annual performance management system that allows for continuous
assessment, review, and improvement of staff performance.
The facility has an established system to reward productivity, quality, service, and teamwork
while penalizing underperformance.
At minimum, the facility has a monthly (but ideally, a quarterly) staff roster. Staff understand
that this roster is subject to change based on prevailing realities and needs of the residents.
Expected Practices:
The physical infrastructure of elderly residential facilities meets the applicable standards set
out in the National Building Code.
All electrical fittings are in good working condition and safe. Bedrooms, bathrooms, and
common areas are lit sufficiently for use and to protect the health and safety of residents.
The electrical wiring of the facility has been approved by the relevant certifying national
agency.
STANDARD 16: SPECIFICATIONS FOR PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
The physical infrastructure of elderly residential facilities are designed and maintained to cater
to the special needs of the elderly.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
31
The facility has running hot and cold water and a back-up water supply that allows for the
continued care of residents for at least 48 hours.
The facility is accessible to differently-abled persons.
Rooms in the facility are clearly labelled.
Directional signs critical for easy navigation of the facility are mounted.
Where the building has more than one storey, it is equipped with elevators. The number of
elevators is determined by the bed capacity of the home and allows for the swift evacuation
of residents.
Windows are secured in a manner to prevent falls, but can easily be opened for fresh air.
All rooms within the facility are well ventilated, in good condition, secure, and clean.
All rooms within the facility are appropriately furnished for their intended purpose, respect
the dignity and meet the needs of residents, and cater for residents’ comfort.
The facility has a designated waiting area that is appropriately furnished and located away
from the bedrooms occupied by residents.
Ward style accommodations are avoided unless the medical condition of residents make it
the most practical option. In such cases, screens are used to protect residents’ privacy and
dignity. In all other cases, each resident is assigned his/her own bedroom, which is outfitted
with electrical outlets and ample storage systems, and decorated as he/she sees fit.
Each bedroom has a lock that can be closed from the inside and opened from the outside in
case of emergency, except in atypical cases where a lock exacerbates a risk to the health and
safety of a resident.
Each bedroom has a window providing natural light, with window coverings to moderate
light and protect resident privacy.
All bedrooms in the facility are accessible from the hallway without having to pass through
any other room.
There is at least one (1) shower stall for every eight (8) persons and one (1) lavatory for
every six (6) persons in residence.
Bathroom doors can be locked from the inside but opened from the outside in cases of
emergency.
The bathrooms have adequate space to facilitate residents’ free movement.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
32
The bathrooms have non-skid floors, are well lit, and are outfitted with well-placed and
secure grab bars.
Where there are self-contained bedrooms or bathrooms are a reasonably far distance away
from living, dining, and recreational areas, a half bath is provided.
There is a specifically designated dining area that is sufficiently furnished to accommodate
all residents in care.
The facility has an area that is specifically designed as a kitchen. The kitchen is well
equipped, includes cold storage facilities, has non-skid floors, and is appropriately outfitted
for cooking large quantities.
The kitchen is subject to an annual inspection of the relevant health authorities.
Documentation of these inspections are maintained by the facility.
The facility has a designated food storage area that is free from rodents, well lit, well
stocked, and secure.
The facility has a specified, well equipped, well lit, and clean area for laundry. The laundry
area includes secure storage space for cleaning agents and chemical products.
The facility includes recreational spaces that are easily accessible to residents during normal
waking hours of the day. These spaces are comfortably furnished and equipped for
recreation.
Outdoor activity areas include a reasonable amount of shelter from sun and inclement
weather, have comfortable seating, and are safe and secure.
The facility is cleaned regularly and the building well maintained.
The environs (including the compound and drains) of the facility are clean and there is a
schedule for continued maintenance.
The facility has a back-up power supply that allows for the continued comfort and care of
residents for at least eight (8) hours during power outages.
Expected Practices
The facility has a robust emergency preparedness, response, and recovery policy in effect.
STANDARD 17: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Elderly residential facilities have established procedures to prepare for and respond to
emergencies, so as to protect the life, health, and liberty of their staff and residents.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
33
The facility provides all necessary training and equipment to support the implementation of
its emergency preparedness, response, and recovery policy. This includes an annual fire drill.
The facility has, at minimum, basic emergency infrastructure (including adequate fire
escapes and extinguishers, emergency lighting in hallways and stairwells, smoke alarms, and
lit exit signs). Emergency exits are not obstructed and are clearly identified.
The facility has alarm systems to allow residents to signal a need for help in cases of a fall,
illness at nights, or other emergency situations. These systems may include individual alarm
buttons (often worn as necklaces), bed buzzers, or emergency buttons in easily accessible
areas across the facility.
Signs of emergency procedures are displayed throughout the facility.
There is at least one security officer on the premises at all times.
The facility has insurance coverage to protect against losses or damage to its assets.
Expected Practices
The facility disposes of medical implements and waste in accordance with local laws and
regulations, and international best practices.
As much as is possible, the facility separates other waste for collection and recycling by local
authorities.
Expected Practices
The facility has established mechanisms for revenue generation.
The facility has clearly outlined arrangements to ensure transparency and accountability,
including the annual independent auditing of its accounts.
The facility has established procedures to promote the efficient and effective management
of its operations.
The facility adheres to standard accounting procedures for the receipt and accounting of all
capital and current donations and expenditure, including cash and in-kind donations.
STANDARD 18: WASTE MANAGEMENT
Elderly residential facilities dispose of waste in an environmentally-friendly manner and in
accordance with local laws and regulations.
STANDARD 19: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Standard accounting and financial systems are adopted to ensure the continued viability of the
facility.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
34
6. THE WAY FORWARD
If the minimum standards proposed are accepted and implemented, it will result in a marked change in the
operations of elderly residential facilities in Guyana. The reality, however, is that many of the existing facilities
do not have the financial or technical resources required to effect the changes necessary to meet these
standards in the short term—even the Government-run Palms Geriatric Facility is unlikely to be able to meet
these standards before 2018.
That said, the minimum standards articulated here are not overly ambitious, unrealistic or unattainable.
Instead, they have been developed to attain a level of care that meets the Government’s international
commitments, considers Guyana’s development priorities, and ensures that the elderly in residential care
facilities receive a respectable level of care that is responsive to their unique needs and realities.
The implementation of these standards will no doubt require cooperation, commitment and concerted effort,
but they are attainable within the next three to five years. During that time, all of the existing facilities should
be able to transition successfully to meet the new requirements, while new facilities are established in line with
the approved standards. That time will also allow the Government Authorities to devise the licensing
mechanism and introduce multi-disciplinary inspections that are required to underpin the operation of elderly
residential facilities if these standards are to have an impact on the level of care delivered.
Moreover, the time will allow for required government support of this process in the short term. While
resource constraints are understood, the Government is ultimately responsible for the care of the elderly, and
so must find new and innovate mechanisms for providing the support required to help existing charitable and
non-profit facilities better serve the elderly in their care. This should not only include a revision of the existing
subvention allotments, but also the introduction of platforms for the sharing of experiences and maximisation
of resources, provision of technical support to develop transition plans for each of those facilities, and the
development of objective criteria for the future allocation of resources to elderly residential facilities.
While these minimum standards are an important component of the work to transform the operation of
elderly residential facilities, the most critical steps in this process should be the raising of awareness about and
enforcement of the Maintenance Act, and addressing the condition of the elderly in Guyana generally. This will
ensure that families assume their moral and legal responsibilities for their elderly relatives, help to decrease
the elderly population in residential facilities, better facilitate active ageing, and begin the groundwork for the
required cultural shift in how Guyanese treat, think about, address, and plan for the care of the elderly.
Finally, the proposed minimum standards are not intended to fix all of the issues experienced in residential
care facilities. Further, the assumption is not that all of the existing facilities are functioning at the same
standard and that that standard is low. Instead, these proposed standards are intended to capture and respond
to the nuanced experiences and realities within existing homes in Guyana, and formalise normal practices that
have proven to be best practices. They are intended to provide a framework to ensure that the quality of care
at all residential facilities meet a respectable minimum level, and allow for the regulation of elderly homes to
the same standards. Most importantly, the aim of these minimum standards is to move elderly care in
residential facilities forward, and make tangible and substantive differences in the lives of persons living in
elderly residential facilities in Guyana.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
35
APPENDIX 1: SITE OBSERVATION CHECKLIST USED FOR FIELD VISITS TO ELDERLY
CARE FACILITIES11.
NAME OF FACILITY:
ADDRESS:
MAIN POINT OF CONTACT:
TELEPHONE:
E-MAIL:
ITEM OBSERVATION COMMENTS
Physical Attributes (indoor and outdoor areas)
Adequate directional signs/information are visible Yes No
All areas are accessible to all persons in care Yes No
Hallways are sufficiently wide for unhindered use
(including by persons in wheelchairs) Yes No
If there is more than one storey in the facility, elevators
are present, commensurate with the number of residents
in care, and operational
Yes No
Monitoring system/emergency signalling device is in place
and appropriate to resident needs Yes No
Controls for signalling devices/lights/elevators are
accessible and easy to use Yes No
Windows are secured in a manner to prevent falls or
exits but can easily be opened for fresh air Yes No
Bedrooms, bathroom and common areas are lit
sufficiently for use and to protect the health and safety
of residents
Yes No
Residents have access to
telephone services Yes No
Communication mechanisms and devices allow staff
to easily communicate with each other across the
facility
Yes No
Electronic surveillance is in place at the facility Yes No
Interconnected smoke alarms are installed Yes No
There is emergency lighting in the hallways and stairs Yes No
Furniture/equipment meet the needs and respect the
dignity of residents, are maintained in good condition and
are clean
Yes No
11
Adapted from the Residential Care Inspection Checklist used by the Vancouver Island Health Authority. 2012 < http://www.viha.ca/NR/rdonlyres/4B9CD362-8AFE-4EC2-A946-BD5D0D45AC61/0/RESIDENTIALCAREROUTINEINSPECTIONCHECKLISTAugust202012.pdf>.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
36
ITEM OBSERVATION COMMENTS
All rooms/common areas are well ventilated, in good
condition, and clean Yes No
Emergency exits are not obstructed and are clearly
identified Yes No
Signs of emergency plans are displayed prominently
throughout the facility Yes No
There are no more than 2 persons assigned to a bedroom Yes No
Doubly occupancy rooms are screened for privacy and
dignity Yes No
Bedrooms are directly accessible from the hallway
without having to pass through any other room Yes No
Bedrooms can be locked from the inside Yes No
Locked entrance to the bedroom can be unlocked from
the outside in cases of emergency Yes No
Double occupancy bedrooms are of adequate size to
comfortably accommodate two persons Yes No
Each bedroom has a window providing natural light
with window coverings to moderate light and
protect resident privacy
Yes No
Windows provide visibility to the outdoors for
non-ambulatory persons in care Yes No
Ample closet space is available to each resident Yes No
Persons in care are permitted to bring in/keep/display
any furniture/ornaments/personal possessions in their
bedroom
Yes No
Bathroom doors can be locked from the inside but
opened from the outside in case of emergency Yes No
Bathrooms floors are slip resistant Yes No
Well placed and secure grab bars are in place in all
bathrooms (showers and toilets) Yes No
If differently-abled persons are admitted to the
facility, bathrooms are designed to accommodate
these persons
Yes No
These are sufficient bathroom facilities for residents in
care. Minimum requirement below:
Residents on floor/in
wing
Bathing facilities on
floor/in wing 3-6 1
7-25 2 26-40 3
41-60 4
61-75 5
Yes No
A half bath is accessible from the living/dining room Yes No
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
37
ITEM OBSERVATION COMMENTS
Bathrooms are clean, have running water, and in good
working condition Yes No
Dining room is sufficiently furnished to accommodate
all residents in care Yes No
Lounge/living facilities are comfortably furnished for
recreation Yes No
Lounge/recreational areas are accessible at all times Yes No
Administrative/staff work area is appropriately
furnished/ equipped and secure Yes No
Safe and secure storage locations are available for
medications and records Yes No
There are safe/secure/adequate storage areas
for cleaning agents/chemical
products/hazardous materials
Yes No
There are separate utility areas for clean
and soiled clothes/bedding/other articles Yes No
There are no unpleasant odours in the
facility Yes No
Outside activity area includes a reasonable amount of
shelter from sun and inclement weather, has comfortable
seating, is safe, and is secure
Yes No
Staffing
The administrator for the facility is on site Yes No
Individual employee files are kept on site and are
easily accessible to manager and supervisors to be
regularly updated
Yes No
Administrator has the personality and temperament
necessary to manage a residential care facility and
demonstrates the training and experience required to
competently run the facility
Yes No
Employees have the personality and temperament
necessary to work at a residential care facility and
demonstrate the training and experience required to
provide quality care to residents
Yes No
At least one floor supervisor is present to oversee the
personal care assistants Yes No
There are a sufficient number of care providers on duty to
meet the needs of the persons in care and assist persons
in care with activities of daily living
Yes No
First aid supplies are readily accessible to all
employees across the facility Yes No
Care providers engage residents kindly and professionally Yes No
Staff are clean and appropriately dressed Yes No
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
38
ITEM OBSERVATION COMMENTS
There is at least 1 medical professional on staff for every
50 residents in care Yes No
Operations
There is order and the facility appears to be run well Yes No
There is a feeling of life and activity about the facility Yes No
There is a pleasant feeling about the facility Yes No
The health, safety, and comfort of persons in care are
checked on regularly Yes No
Persons incapable of identifying themselves have been
fitted with an identifying bracelet or other means of
identification that cannot be removed or easily lost
Yes No
Laundry room is operational, clean, safe and secure Yes No
Assistance is provided to residents to maintain good
dental and physical hygiene Yes No
Care plans are available for all residents and easily
accessible to staff to inform their care of residents Yes No
Employees administering medications are
trained/qualified to do so Yes No
Weekly menu is prominently displayed Yes No
Snacks are provided at times to meet needs of persons in
care Yes No
Persons in care are encouraged to participate in menu
planning, meal preparation, food service, related activities
(but not for the convenience of staff)
Yes No
Persons in care are receiving adequate food to meet
their needs Yes No
Sufficient quantity and variation of fluids is provided to
meet needs and preferences of persons in care Yes No
Water is easily accessible 24 hours a day Yes No
Food is prepared in a sanitary environment Yes No
There is running water in the kitchen Yes No
Staff in charge of preparation and delivery of food wear
protective and safety gear Yes No
Residents
Residents are dressed and clean Yes No
Residents appear happy Yes No
Residents are allowed to interact with each other and are
participating in physical, recreational, and social activities Yes No
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
39
APPENDIX 2: SUMMARY REPORTS FOR FIELD VISITS TO ELDERLY CARE FACILITIES
NAME OF FACILITY: Palms Geriatric Facility ADDRESS: Brickdam, Georgetown, Guyana CONTACT PERSON: Ms. Douglas, Administrator TELEPHONE: 226-6924 EMAIL: [email protected]
OPERATIONS: - Furniture provided to residents unsafe and unfit for use by
elders - Laundry area and baskets and ward storage rooms not
clean and well maintained - Recreational room operational and furnished but games
not present on inspection and room unused - Residents with mobility problems on upper floors and so
confined to ward unless moved by a porter—no stretchers used during visit
- Day passes used to allow residents to go out and visits by family allowed and encouraged
- No dietician or nutritionist on staff but working with MoPH for technical support to ensure nutritious meals are provided and cater to medical conditions of residents
- No care plans for residents—needs are picked up from resident charts or by trial and error
- Residents wear anything that is clean—are not assigned own clothes
- Recreational and social activities planned periodically—especially for national holidays and Month of the Elderly. Exercise programmes not arranged
- Health inspections are usually performed semi-annually but report not shared with Palms to allow adjustments to be made
- Resident complaints are generally handled by the social worker—comfortable reporting issues to current admin
OCCUPANCY: 240 residents (mixed-sex)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: Ms. Rogers
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Unknown
MEDICAL: - MoH doctor present from Mon—Friday along with 2
Medices (1 from MoPH and the other hired by MoSP) - Neither staff or residents required to be up to date on
vaccinations - 1/2 PCAs per ward on shift at nights and weekends but no
doctor or medex. Nurse or medex comes to dispense medications and leaves
MANAGEMENT: - Administered by the MoSP – all hiring handled by the
Ministry. No formal disciplinary measures in place for staff - Admission based on age, family situation, and need.
Medical required but more to allow the staff to be aware of care needs than to determine admission
- No core values or management policies elaborated. No job orientation or job aides provided
STAFF: - 129 staff total –PCAs and nurses insufficient to provide
quality care to residents. 25 – 35 residents seen in each ward. Max of 2 PCAs seen at a time per ward with no supervisor—residents seen dragging selves in wheelchairs
- Staff work in shifts—schedule generally prepared anywhere between one week to a month in advance
- Generally provided with necessary safety equipment but supplies not always on time or in needed quantities
- Morale varies but there are obvious issues between the staff and management and there is little confidence in established grievance process
- Problems with staff reporting for work at nights and on weekends
- Admin, residents and staff agree that most PCAs are not sufficiently trained for their jobs
- No talent management plan in place. Try to provide re-education opportunities for staff when possible
PHYSICAL:: - Building is very old—more than 100 years old. - Back-up power present. H&C water to be installed in 2016 - Ward-style facilities for residents. No screens seen being
used - All bathroom floors do not have non-skid tiles and there
were large puddles of water on 3 of the 4 bathrooms inspected. No grab bars installed and doors do not have appropriate locks
- Windows allow for good light and free flow of air, but are not sufficiently secure to protect against falls or jumps. (A woman with signs of dementia fell out of a third storey window a week after the visit)
- 6 wards in 2 buildings with 3 storeys each—no elevators - Exit signs present and cleared exits, but no emergency
lighting in stairwells and halls, and exit signs do not light up in darkness
- No smoke alarms visible during walk through – fire extinguishers present and assembly point identified but no emergency plan
- Well manicured grounds with ample shade provided and benches strategically located across the grounds
- Large holes visible in the walls of the bottom flat of both buildings and cats flow freely in and out of the building.
FINANCIAL: - Fully funded by Government (no fee for residents) but also
receive donations from private individuals, Food for the Poor, and the private sector
- Finances are linked to the Ministry so budgetary allocations are made according to the Ministry budget approved by Parliament for each year
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
40
NAME OF FACILITY: Uncle Eddie’s Home ADDRESS: 826-829 Jackson St, Tucville, Georgetown CONTACT PERSON: Ms. Christine Hales, Administrator TELEPHONE: 226-0298 EMAIL: [email protected]
OPERATIONS: - Residents are allowed free movement but no formal pass
or ‘tracking’ system in place - Quarterly recreational and social activities (luncheons,
concerts, etc). No physical activities planned—residents generally entertain selves
- There is a resident representative that raises resident issues with the administrators—also monthly meetings between residents and the Board
- Residents that want to be are engaged in basic activities for the operation of the home (gardening, locking windows, laundry, washing dishes, etc)—proven to build morale and help residents feel respected and important
- No water dispensers for 24 access to water seen - Guard services in the evening for security and to prevent
wandering - Residents are sometimes asked to leave if found to affect
the comfort of or endanger other residents - No formal operating procedures in place. Current admin
there in part to document and introduce procedures, duties, core values, donation and leave policies, etc.
- No social worker employed or assigned from the MoSP - No individual care plans for residents—needs are picked up
from admissions interview or by trial and error - No known health inspection from authorities - No dietician or nutritionist on staff but cooks do cater for
nutritional needs based on info from Admin.
OCCUPANCY: 24 residents (mixed-sex)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: None
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Never
MEDICAL: - Caters for able-bodied residents so no medical staff in
house—both a nurse and a doctor are on call in addition to monthly visits from neighbourhood health centre
- Administers basic medication (pressure and diabetes tablets, etc) to residents (separated by days into pill box)
- Neither staff or residents required to be up to date on vaccinations
MANAGEMENT: - Managed by a Board of Directors. 2 members and the
administrator (Resident Care Committee) review applications for admission and make decisions
- Admission based on age, ability to care for self, medical and in-person interview. Aim is to admit persons to provide a space for them to livee a fruitful life.
- Background and reference checks conducted during hiring process. Target past PCAs at GPHC.
STAFF: - An admin, 5 PCAs, 1 supervisor, 4 cleaners, 2 cooks and a
relief cook (cooks have food handlers certificates) - Draw on students of training institutes that are seeking
practical experience - 2 persons on duty at night. Weekend operations mirror the
working week - Most persons hired at the facility have been trained in care
for the elderly, but there are questions on the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of training provided as there are obvious gaps in the knowledge of persons who are hired by the facility after completing courses
- No significant turnover of staff even though there is only a modest benefits package ($35,000 salary with NIS and vacation leave)
PHYSICAL:: - Building is clean but old. Attempts to do renovation work
(including current work to refurbish a wing for self contained rooms) but need a new roof, a complete paint job, replacement of rotten wood, cleaning/replacement of tiles and windows throughout the facility
- Flat building with wide hallways so accessible to all - Windows are barred and so prevent entry by intruders or
unplanned exits by residents - One bedroom provided for each resident. Rooms include
closet space and residents encouraged to bring belongings to design room as desired. Bedrooms can be locked from the inside and if done, can be opened from outside in case of emergency. Bed ridden residents in a ward with 5 to 7 persons. No screens seen. 2-3 shower and lavatory stalls in every wing of about 5-10 residents
- Bathrooms (shower and toilet) do not have grab bars. There are a few wheelchair accessible baths. Mold visible in bathrooms
- Furniture is dated but clean and include sofas and accent chairs—no plastic chairs seen
- Insufficient exit and directional signs but exits unobstructed. Some smoke detectors seen. No emergency lighting
- Large yard space but significant drainage issues so not developed for use by residents—also affects foundation
FINANCIAL: - Privately funded with no subvention from Government (in
part due to lack of audited accounts) - 40,000 per resident per month; 45,000 per month if
bedridden. Many residents in arrears on payment and family engagement low.
- Depend heavily on private donations (individuals, Banks DIH, NBS, GBTI, etc) and partnerships with agencies like Prison Service for cleaning of yard
- Expenses: approx $1M per month. Exceeds revenue.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
41
NAME OF FACILITY: St. Thomas Moore Men’s Homestead ADDRESS: 216 Lamaha Street, Kitty, Georgetown CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Winston Playter, Administrator TELEPHONE: 226-8594 EMAIL: [email protected]
OPERATIONS: - Residents are allowed free movement-6pm curfew. Check
out system in place to track who is in house and who isn’t - Regular social (men’s fellowship, games night, church
service, monthly library visits to borrow books and participate in guest lectures, etc) and physical activities (resident organised walks in yard or on the seawalls)
- Water cooler in kitchen provides 24 access to water - Residents have basic utensils in room and prepare snacks
for selves. Also wash, hang out and pickup own laundry and wash their dishes from meals. Clean their own rooms while staff deal with hallways and common areas
- Residents are sometimes asked to leave if found to affect the comfort of or endanger other residents or break house rules. Written copy of rules given to residents upon admission—rule book currently being updated
- No social worker employed or assigned from the MoSP - Health inspections in the past from the Bureau of
Standards and Vector Control Unit of MTC - No dietician or nutritionist on staff but cooks do cater for
nutritional needs based on info from Admin (gathered from admissions process). Weekly meal menu present and ‘fancy’ meals prepared for birthdays and big holidays
- File for each resident present on site and accessible by staff
- Board deals with any issues or complaints from residents—holds monthly meetings and report submitted to Superior Council of the Church
OCCUPANCY: 20 residents (male)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: None
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Unknown
MEDICAL: - Caters for able-bodied residents so no medical staff in
house—monthly visits from neighbourhood health centre - Administers basic medication (pressure and diabetes
tablets, etc) to residents (separates by days into pill box) and help to deal with simple dressing
- Neither staff or residents required to be up to date on vaccinations
MANAGEMENT: - Managed by the Society of St. Vincent De Paul. A voluntary
Board is in place (Chairman, Finance Officer, Administrator)—review applications for admission and make decisions
- Admission based on age (60 – 70), ability to care for self, medical and in-person interview. Aim is to admit persons to provide a space for them to lie a fruitful life.
STAFF: - Two full time staff (senior care assistant and cook) and a
part time care giver. Also a house father – there 24hrs a day
- Cook trained at YWCA and has an expired food handlers certificate. PCA did a course on caring for persons with disabilities at UG, used to work at an HIV care centre and then transitioned to caring for the elderly
- No significant turnover of staff even though there is only a modest benefits package provided (approx $30,000 salary with NIS, 2 weeks vacation leave, one day off per week and sick leave)
PHYSICAL:: - Three storeyed building but no elevator. One resident in
wheelchair on the ground flat. Hallways wide to allow free movement of the wheelchair but no wheelchair accessible bathroom seen. Slip resistant tile used.
- Building is relatively new and is in good condition (although there is some odour is the bathrooms). Main kitchen setup is basic and could be improved, but is functional. Mini-kitchens on each of the upper floors but without any appliances to make fully functional
- Windows on the bottom floor are barred but not the top 2 floors. Falls aren’t likely but someone can jump out
- One bedroom provided for each resident. Rooms include closet space and residents encouraged to bring belongings to design room as desired. Bedrooms can be locked from the inside and if done, can be opened from outside in case of emergency. 3 shower and lavatory stalls on every floor with about 10 - 12 residents
- Furniture in the common areas are dated but clean and include sofas and accent chairs—no plastic chairs seen
- No directional signs but exits unobstructed and marked. No emergency lighting in stairs and hallways or smoke detectors. Fire extinguishers and sand buckets seen. Fire escape present on every floor.
- Very little yard space. What is there is used for laundry, back-up water supply and storage
FINANCIAL: - No financial support from Government or Catholic Church - 30,000 per resident per month. Depend heavily on private
donations (individuals, Banks DIH, etc) and involvement from families (which come to take out residents and purchase required personal items)
- Biggest bills are the utilities (water and electricity) and once food is bought, all of the remainder generally goes to these utilities. Formal financial records kept
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
42
NAME OF FACILITY: Salvation Army Ladies Senior Citizen’s Home ADDRESS: 69 Bent and Haley Street, Wortmanville CONTACT PERSON: Captain Leba Hayling, Administrator TELEPHONE: 226-8846 EMAIL: -
OPERATIONS: - Residents are allowed free movement—7pm curfew and
exceptions can be made if residents have evening functions and give advance notice. No formal tracking system in place
- No planned activities for residents outside of devotion and weekly house meetings.
- No water dispenser for 24 hour access to water seen (NB: kitchen was being remodelled at time of visit)
- Residents deal with own laundry but are supported as needed by the Admin. Clean their own room and volunteers clean the hallways and common areas
- Residents are sometimes asked to leave if found to affect the comfort of or endanger other residents
- Residents sign agreement on admission. Also given written rules of the home
- No social worker employed or assigned from the MoSP - No known health inspections from authorities - No dietician or nutritionist on staff but cooks do cater for
nutritional needs based on info from Admin (from registration form on admission).
- Records (but not formal care plans) for each resident present on site and accessible by staff
- Issues or complaints are dealt with by Administrator during weekly house meetings
- No emergency plan - No articulated core values or policy for operation of home - Only home visited with Wi-Fi available
OCCUPANCY: 9 residents (female)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: None
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Never
MEDICAL: - Caters for able-bodied residents so no medical staff in
house—no regular visits from community health centre, but some residents go to the centre for care. Private doctors’ services engaged for other residents when ill
- Residents receive medication from visits to doctor—volunteers do not dispense
- Resident up to date with vaccines. Volunteers not required to be
MANAGEMENT: - Managed by Salvation Army Corps through placement of a
Admin - Admission based on age (60+), ability to care for self,
medical and in-person interview. Aim is to admit persons to provide a space for them to lie a fruitful life.
STAFF: - No staff—workers volunteer their time and are given a
small stipend: Cook, handyman/driver and administrator. Admin on site 24 hours a day.
- Cook does not have a food handlers certificate. Admin has no formal training in elderly care but was trained by the Salvation Army on social care. Also has an Associate’s degree in Law and has more than 28 years experience doing social work
- No significant turnover of staff except for rotation of Admin based on Salvation Army system
-
PHYSICAL:: - Two storeyed building, with home on the top floor but no
elevator or chair lift (Church and living accommodations for Admin on the bottom).
- Building is in relatively good condition and clean. Kitchen being refurbished to include proper kitchen cupboards and upgrade floor covering.
- Windows are not barred—falls aren’t likely but someone can jump out
- One bedroom provided for each resident. Rooms include closet space and residents encouraged to bring belongings to design room as desired. Bedrooms can be locked from the inside and if done, can be opened from outside in case of emergency. 2 shower and lavatory stalls present—laundry sink in bath area for residents to do laundry.
- Furniture in the common areas are dated but clean and include sofas and accent chairs—no plastic chairs seen
- No directional signs and exits unobstructed but not marked. No emergency lighting in hallway or smoke detectors. No fire extinguishers or sand buckets seen.
- Some yard space available—residents can use for recreation with chairs from Church
FINANCIAL: - 40,000 annual subvention received from the Government - 35,000 per resident per month. Depend heavily on private
donations (individuals, Banks DIH, supermarkets, etc) and involvement from families (some of which come to take out residents and purchase personal items)
- Revenue just enough to buy food and cover utilities. Formal financial records kept and submitted to Salvation Army Corps
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
43
NAME OF FACILITY: Sister’s Missionary of Charity ADDRESS: 16 Public Road, Houston, East Bank Demerara CONTACT PERSON: Sister Lucinda, Administrator TELEPHONE: 226-1772 EMAIL: -
OPERATIONS: - Operate a day-care on site. 42 children, ages 1-3. Children
go over to elder’s facilities to spend time with residents - Physical, social and recreation activities facilitated by an
NGO once a week. Also plan celebrations for birthdays and special events. Priest performs mass at the home once a week
- Persons that can move around on their own and want to go out to handle private issues are allowed to—few do and since most don’t have families present, visitation isn’t an issue
- Water dispenser for 24 hour access to water seen - Staff deal with all laundry (by hand) and cleaning needs - No formal agreement or rules of the home - No social worker employed or assigned from the MoSP, but
have had interactions with MoSP and MoH in the past for meetings and inspections
- Residents who are able bodied and want to, help out with basic chores like watering plants, dishing out meals, etc
- No dietician or nutritionist on staff but cooks do cater for nutritional needs based on info from medical records
- Records of medication dispensed, etc maintained but no formal care plans
- Resident issues are first handled by the Sister in charge of the facility; if resident not satisfied with recourse, the issue is then raised with Sister in charge of the entire complex
- No emergency plan or procedures - Residents allowed to bring a chest of drawers and small
possessions if any
OCCUPANCY: 12 residents (female)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: None
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Unknown
MEDICAL: - Although caters for persons who can’t care for themselves,
only a trained nurse on site. Nurse purchases and dispenses medication according to doctors’ orders
- Three private doctors are on call that they contact in emergency situations. No consistent visits by neighbourhood health centre.
- Room assigned and equipped for doctor’s visits—locked storage room which houses medication and other personal item supplies attached to room for doctor’s use.
MANAGEMENT: - Subsidiary of an international charity. Managed in line with
policies of parent org as well as adopt the practices of the Catholic Church
- Admission based on age (60+), family status, medical and need. Geared for persons who can’t take care of themselves and have no familial support. Also house persons who have been in the orphanage system their entire life and have nowhere else to go.
STAFF: - Admin as well as the 2 persons who deal with cleaning,
laundry and care for the residents are at the facility 24 hours a day. Soup kitchen manned by a Sister and an assistant. Day-care is also manned by another Sister.
- Sisters have training on caring for the elderly (online courses) and through programmes put on by the parent organisation. Also have on-the-job training to administer first aid, change dressings, and do other medical support functions. Cook does not have a food handlers certificate. Generally have temperament to do the work and skills based on years of experience but not formal training.
PHYSICAL:: - Elderly facility is a flat building. Building is relatively new
(with a shaded porch) and in excellent condition (donation to the Church from a private citizen that died and then Church donated to organisation for home). Separate buildings for storage, laundry and kitchen, but there is a food distribution station in home. Plans underway to convert an empty room into a therapy room for residents.
- Kitchen is rustic and designed for cooking large quantities—likely because of soup kitchen. Could be improved (eg: enclosed cupboards) but no major issues.
- Expansive grounds with gardens—also includes a pool that is not operational and slated to be turned into a covered playground and garden
- Windows are not barred—falls aren’t likely. No concern about residents jumping out since most are bedridden and yard is well secured.
- Ward style accommodations for residents—20 beds; no privacy screens used. 6 shower and toilet stalls with non-skid floors and grab bars in each
- Furniture in the common areas are clean but sparse - No directional signs and exits unobstructed but not
marked. No emergency lighting in hallway or smoke detectors. No fire extinguishers or sand buckets seen.
FINANCIAL: - Parent organisation covers all costs (including any hospital
bills or burial costs). Residents not required to make any financial contributions.
- Do receive some donations from private individuals and companies
- No clear indication of operating costs—financial sheets include expenses for soup kitchen and day-care also operated by the facility
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
44
NAME OF FACILITY: Holy Family ADDRESS: 73 Vlissengen Road, Wortmanville, Georgetown CONTACT PERSON: Mr. Beharry, Administrator TELEPHONE: 664-9449 or 220-2684 EMAIL: -
OPERATIONS: - Residents care entirely for selves. Home just provides
shelter—no other services (meals, laundry, activities). So no care plans or weekly menu or activity schedule, etc. Some residents have friends or interested parties who come in and care for them on a regular basis
- Participate in events held by private agencies (like the Lion’s Club, St. Sidwell’s Church, Banks DIH, UG, John Fernandes and Republic Bank)
- Residents are allowed free movement—gate is closed at 6:30pm. Residents can go spend weekend or longer visits with family—just need to let the Admin know
- Residents are sometimes asked to leave if found to affect the comfort of or endanger other residents
- No social worker employed or assigned from the MoSP - No known health inspections from authorities - Issues or complaints are dealt with by Administrator during
weekly-biweekly house meetings, and then raised with wider Board if necessary
- No formal emergency plan - No articulated core values or policy for operation of home - Have been numerous break-ins in the past, but no
resources for a security guard or to put better security measures in home.
OCCUPANCY: 13 residents (female)
ASSIGNED SOCIAL WORKER: None
LAST INSPECTION DATE: Never
MEDICAL: - No medical staff in house or arrangement for visits from
neighbourhood health centre. Residents go to hospital for all care and administer own basic medication (pressure + diabetes tablets) based on doctor’s orders
- Residents not required to be up to date on medication
MANAGEMENT: - Owned by the Bishop of Georgetown/St. Vincent De Paul
and run by a volunteer Board of 8 persons - Admission based on age (60+), ability to care for self,
medical and in-person interview. Aim is to provide shelter for ambulatory persons with nowhere else to go. Persons sent to hospital if ill, and go to Palms if eventually unable to care for selves
STAFF: - No staff as facility provides no services but shelter. There
was a house matron in the past but no longer so there is also no one present but residents on a day to day basis
PHYSICAL:: - Two storeyed building; no elevator or stair lifts. - Outside of building is painted and looks to be in decent
condition. Inside is dark, dreary and not well maintained. No real kitchen area—a tiled area for cooking and laundry but it’s a small area for each resident, dirty and not up to any standard for a cooking area. Residents also complain about problems with the electrical (overheats any appliances they buy)
- Windows are not barred—falls aren’t likely but someone can jump out—thieves gain access through windows often
- One bedroom provided for each resident. Rooms house all of residents belongings including stoves (generally hot plates or kerosene stoves) because of theft. Bedrooms can be locked from the inside—resident’s personal lock. Shower and lavatory stalls present for every 4-6 residents but not clean (some sinks and toilets overflowing) or with enough space for easy movement
- What furniture is present in the common areas are old and run down but are sofas and not plastic chairs
- No directional signs. Exits unobstructed but not marked. No emergency lighting in hallway. Smoke detectors seen. No fire extinguishers or sand buckets seen.
- Decent yard space available but not maintained or set up for use by residents
FINANCIAL: - 40,000 annual subvention received from the Government - Don’t have a set monthly fee but ask residents to
contribute if they can to help take care of utility bills ($1,000). Depend heavily on private individuals and companies to help pay bills.
- Residents pay a $30,000 burial deposit, which is returned to family if facility doesn’t deal with burial
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
45
APPENDIX 3: DATA COLLECTION PROTOCOLS USED FOR FIELD VISITS
TO ELDERLY RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES
Appendix 3.1: Facility Management
The Consultant introduced herself and outlined the engagement by the MoSP to develop minimum
standards for elderly care facilities across Guyana. She underscored the confidentiality of the
process, explaining to the participant/participants that no individual would be identified in the
reports produced. Participants were encouraged to be open and provide frank responses to the
questions posed to help the Consultant develop a true picture of the operations, issues, and
challenges at the facility.
Note: The questions that follow served as a guide for the discussion, and so illustrate the general line
of questioning. Follow-up and additional questions were asked as appropriate based on the initial
responses provided.
General:
Are you registered with the State? If so, for how long?
Have you ever had an inspection visit? If so, when was the last such visit?
How many persons can the facility comfortably accommodate?
How many persons are there currently in the facility? (seek a breakdown by sex and age
group: <60, 60 – 65, 66-70, 71-75, 76-80, 81 – 85, 86-90, 90-100, above 100)
Operations:
On what basis are persons admitted to the facility?
Does your facility accommodate persons with special needs (physical and mental)? If so,
how? If no, why not?
For residents who are confused, how does the facility prevent them from wandering away?
What happens to persons who:
Are incontinent and can no longer take care of themselves?
Are unable to bathe or dress alone anymore?
Are confused and need redirection?
Have socially inappropriate behaviours?
Need help with injections or other medications?
Are unable to walk unassisted, or get in or out of bed?
Need night-time help?
Are dying?
Do you have an established system to develop care plans for residents? If so, please describe
that system. Are residents involved in discussions to establish their care plan? If not, why do
you not have one? What alternate systems do you use to determine required care for
residents? What are the hindrances to establishing a system of individualised care plans?
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
46
How is food prepared for residents? What best practices are adopted? Does the facility have
a food permit? Are the medical conditions of residents factored into meal plans? If so, how?
If not, why not?
Do you plan activities for the residents in your care? If so, what are those activities and how
often are they conducted?
How is laundry handled for residents in care?
When someone complains, what happens?
What causes residents to be asked to leave the facility? In these cases, does the facility assist
with alternative placement?
Is there an emergency preparedness, response and recovery plan in place? If so, how often
is it tested? Are staff au fait with planned processes and procedures? If no, why not?
What arrangements are in place to clean the facility? How often is it cleaned?
How do the operations on weekends vary from during the week?
Medical:
Are residents required to be immunised before admittance to the facility?
How is medical care provided: Is there a medical practitioner on site? Does a physician or
nurse practitioner come to the facility? Does the facility provide a van to take residents to
doctor’s appointments? Are family members required to take their relative to
appointments?
How do residents receive required medication? Who absorbs the cost of procuring the
medication?
What happens if a resident is temporarily admitted to the hospital?
Management:
How long has the facility been in operation?
Who owns the facility? Is this different from the individual/company that manages it?
Does the owner have other elderly care facilities? Is the owner involved in any other sector-
related activities?
What would you say is the overarching goal of the facility?
Does the facility have core values that inform its treatment of staff and residents? If so, what
are those core values?
Is there a benefits package available to staff? What is included in the package?
Are staff insured for on-the-job injuries?
Do you have an employee orientation programme? If so, what does it involve?
What would you say is the facility’s reputation among sector stakeholders? Why do you
think so?
Do you have a talent management plan in place? What do you do to retain staff?
Has the facility ever been in trouble with the State? If so, when and why?
Staff:
What are the required qualifications for your managers and care-giving staff? How does this
inform and/or correlate with the salary structure of the facility?
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
47
What are the facility’s hiring policies? Are reference checks performed? Background checks?
For how long have key staff (manager, social worker, nurse, etc) worked at the facility?
What is the staff-to-resident ratio at the facility? Is this your ideal ratio or do you believe it
needs to be higher? Please explain.
How are staff’s competence and skills updated and tested? If there a capacity building plan
in place?
Are staff required to be up to date on their vaccinations? What systems are in place to
ensure this happens?
Are staff required to be trained in CPR and basic first aid? Does the facility provide refresher
training for staff in these areas?
Is staff performance regularly accessed and documented? How?
How are staff rewarded (penalised) for good (poor) work?
Financial:
What is the cost structure for residents at your facility?
Does the revenue generated cover the facilities operational costs? What are those costs?
Does the facility receive donations? If so, what is the estimated monetary value of the
annual donations received? Who are those donations received from?
Does this facility receive or has it applied to receive an annual subvention? If so, what has
been the value of the subventions received over the last five (5) years?
Closing:
Those are all of the questions I have. Have I missed any areas that you think need to be
explored? Is there anything you would like to add?
Appendix 3.2: Facility Staff
The Consultant introduced herself and outlined the engagement by the MoSP to develop minimum
standards for elderly care facilities across Guyana. She underscored the confidentiality of the
process, explaining to the participant/participants that no individual would be identified in the
reports produced. Participants were encouraged to be open and provide frank responses to the
questions posed to help the Consultant develop a true picture of the operations, issues, and
challenges at the facility.
Note: The questions that follow served as a guide for the discussion, and so illustrate the general line
of questioning. Follow-up and additional questions were asked as appropriate based on the initial
responses provided.
General:
How long have you been working here?
Do you like what you do? What motivated you to take this job?
What are some of the things you enjoy most about this job?
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
48
What are your biggest frustrations about the job?
Staff:
Do you feel empowered to do your job? Why/why not?
Are there enough staff to provide quality care to residents?
Do you think the staff here are well trained and appropriate for the job they perform?
Is there a plan in place to administer leave efficiently to ensure that it doesn’t affect the
operation of the facility?
Are staff treated well?
Is the management approachable?
Do you feel engaged in decision-making that will affect how you perform your job?
Is there high staff turnover?
Residents:
Do you know the names of all of the residents here?
Do you think the residents are comfortable here? Happy?
Have you ever seen a resident mistreated here? If so, can you describe what happened?
Facilities/Operations:
Is this a healthy work environment?
Do you have the equipment and the infrastructure here to provide quality care to residents?
How do you handle difficult residents?
If there is an emergency, do you know what to do? Have you ever been trained in
emergency management? Do you have a copy of the facility’s emergency plan?
Do you know the specific care needs of each resident? If so, how?
What do you think of the operations of the facility overall?
Closing:
Would you encourage friends/family to work at similar facilities? Why? Why not?
Thinking ahead, if this facility continues to run as it currently is, would you want to be a
resident here in your elder years? Why? Why not?
If you could change anything about this facility or how it is run, what would that be?
Those are all of the questions I have. Have I missed any areas that you think need to be
explored? Is there anything you’d like to add to what we’ve discussed?
Appendix 3.3: Residents in Care
The Consultant introduced herself and outlined the engagement by the MoSP to develop minimum
standards for elderly care facilities across Guyana. She underscored the confidentiality of the
process, explaining to the participant/participants that no individual would be identified in the
reports produced, and asked the residents if they are willing to have a chat. Participants were
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
49
encouraged to be open and provide frank responses to the questions posed to help the Consultant
develop a true picture of the operations, issues, and challenges at the facility.
Note: The questions that follow served as a guide for the discussion, and so illustrate the general line
of questioning. Follow-up and additional questions were asked as appropriate based on the initial
responses provided.
General:
How long have you lived here? What were the circumstances that prompted your move
here?
Do you have living family? Do they come to visit? How often?
Do you feel at home here? Why? Why not?
Staff:
Do the staff call you by your name? Do they treat you with dignity and respect?
Are you comfortable with the staff that provide your care? Do they check on you regularly?
Do you think they are well trained?
Do the staff take time to talk with you and the other residents?
Do you think the staff here truly care for you?
If you had concerns about something that occurred here, how willing would you be to report
it to a supervisor/manager/social worker?
Do you think there are enough staff on duty at any given time? How about on weekends?
Holidays?
If you have trouble moving/bathing/eating, do you receive assistance from the staff?
Do you think the staff are motivated at work? Do you think they enjoy their jobs?
Have you ever seen a staff member mistreated by management?
Does the staff change regularly?
Operations:
What do you like to do for fun? Can you continue your hobbies here? Have the staff ever
asked you about that and tried to ensure those activities are available?
Are you given opportunities to interact with your friends and other residents of the facility?
Can you be alone if you want to?
Are there opportunities for you to exercise or become involved in the day-to-day chores of
the facility?
Are social activities planned? If so, how often? What was the last one planned? Did you
enjoy it? When there are activities, are there enough staff to help? If not, do you think you
would enjoy social programmes?
How do you like the food prepared here?
What is your favourite food? Do they ever cook that here?
Do you think the meals prepared take into consideration your medical history and any
dietary restrictions you may have?
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
50
Do you have access to snacks and water during the day?
Are you involved in any discussions on the type of care you require/would like to have?
Do you have access to telephones or computers here?
Have you ever seen a resident here harassed or mistreated?
Facilities:
How often is this place as clean and well-maintained as you would like?
Do you like your room here? What do you like/not like about it?
Do you think your valuables here are safe?
Are you able to move around comfortably? How about at night?
If there were an emergency, do you know what to do? Can you easily find the exits? How
confident are you that the staff know what to do to get you to safety?
Are there any problems here with rodents or other pests?
Medical:
Do you receive regular medical treatment while here?
Is there usually a nurse or other medical practitioner on site?
Are you required to take medication regularly? Is your medication provided to you when you
need it?
If your health deteriorates, how confident are you that the facility will be able to make
arrangements to meet your future medical needs?
Closing:
Would you recommend this facility to your friends? Why? Why not?
Is there anything else you would like to tell me?
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
51
APPENDIX 4: REFERENCES AND RESOURCES
Audit Office of Guyana. Follow-up Performance Audit Report: An Assessment of the Living Conditions
of the Residents of the Palms Geriatric Institution. Guyana, 2015.
Beaie, Sonkarley Tiatun. 2002 Population & Housing Census – National Census Report. Guyana, 2007.
Caribbean Community Secretariat. Press Release: Caribbean Charter on Health and Ageing Launched.
Guyana, 2009. <http://www.caricom.org/jsp/pressreleases/pres105_99.jsp?null&prnf=1>.
Cloos, Patrick, et al. Active Ageing: A Qualitative Study in Six Caribbean Countries. 2009.
<http://www.globalaging.org/elderrights/world/2010/active-ageing.pdf>.
Department of Health. Care Homes for Older People: National Minimum Standards and the Care
Homes Regulation 2001. London, 2006. <
http://www.dignityincare.org.uk/_library/resources/dignity/csipcomment/csci_national_minimum_
standards.pdf>.
Economic Commission for Latin America and The Caribbean. Population Ageing In The Caribbean: An
Inventory Of Policies, Programmes And Future Challenges. Chile, 2003. <
http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/38861/LCCARG772_en.pdf?sequence=1>.
Fredvang, Marthe and Simon Biggs. The Rights of Older Persons: Protection and Gaps Under Human
Right Law. Australia, 2012.
Government of Guyana. National Development Strategy (Guyana).Guyana, 2005.
Health Information and Quality Authority. National Quality Standards for Residential Care Settings
for Older People in Ireland. Ireland, 2008. <
https://www.hiqa.ie/system/files/HIQA_Residential_Care_Standards_2008.pdf>.
Jones, Francis. Ageing in the Caribbean and the Human Rights of Older Persons: Twin Imperatives for
Action. Chile, 2016.
<http://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/39854/S1501220_en.pdf?sequence=1>.
Laws of Guyana. Chapter 36:04: Friendly Societies. Guyana, 1998.
Laws of Guyana. Chapter 45:03: Maintenance Act. Guyana, 1998.
Laws of Guyana. Chapter 99:10: Occupational Safety and Health Act. Guyana, 1997.
Ministry of Labour, Human Services and Social Security. Minimum Operational Standards and
Regulations for Children’s Homes in Guyana. Guyana, 2006.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
52
Ministry of Finance. Budget Speech 2016 by Finance Minister Winston Jordan. Guyana, 2016.
Ministry of Health and Social Development. National Policy on Residential Care Facilities for Older
Persons. Anguilla, 2012.
<http://www.gov.ai/documents/health/National%20Policy%20on%20Residential%20Care%20Faciliti
es%20for%20Older%20Persons.pdf>.
Ministry of Social Development. Older Persons Act 13 of 2006. South Africa, 2006. <
http://www.saflii.org/za/legis/consol_reg/opa13o2006rangnr260612.pdf>.
Ministry of Social Protection. Human Services and Social Security: The Palms. Guyana, 2016. <
http://www.mlhsss.gov.gy/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=188&Itemid=77>.
National Council for Senior Citizens. National Policy For Senior Citizens. Jamaica, 1997. < http://www.ifa-fiv.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/061_Jamaica-National-Policy-for-Senior-Citizens.pdf>. Parliamentary Secretariat for Rights of Persons with Disability and Active Ageing. National Minimum Standards: Care Homes for Older People. Malta, 2015. < https://activeageing.gov.mt/en/Documents/NMS%20-%20Final%20-%2018%203%2014.pdf>.
Polzer, Karl. Assisted Living State Regulatory Review 2011. National Centre for Assisted Living.
Washington, 2011. <
https://www.ahcancal.org/ncal/resources/documents/2011assistedlivingregulatoryreview.pdf>.
Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. The Homes for Older Persons Act. Trinidad, 2000. <
http://www.ttparliament.org/legislations/a2000-38.pdf>.
Rodríguez-Pinzón, Diego and Claudia Martin. The International Human Rights Status of Elderly
Persons. American University International Law Review 18, no. 4 (2003): 915-1008.
Singh, Kultar. Quantitative Social Research Methods. Sage Publications. India, 2007.
United Nations. Background: International Day of Older Persons. 2015. <
http://www.un.org/en/events/olderpersonsday/background.shtml>.
United Nations. Political Declaration and Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing: Second
World Assembly on Ageing. New York, 2002. <
http://www.un.org/en/events/pastevents/pdfs/Madrid_plan.pdf>.
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Paris, 1948.
<http://www.ohchr.org/EN/UDHR/Documents/UDHR_Translations/eng.pdf >.
United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Principles for Older Persons: Adopted by General
Assembly resolution 46/91 of 16 December 1991. New York, 1991. <
http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/46/a46r091.htm>.
REPORT Consultancy to Develop Minimum Standards for Elderly Residential Facilities in Guyana
53
Vancouver Island Health Authority. Residential Care Inspection Checklist. 2012
<http://www.viha.ca/NR/rdonlyres/4B9CD362-8AFE-4EC2-A946-
BD5D0D45AC61/0/RESIDENTIALCAREROUTINEINSPECTIONCHECKLISTAugust202012.pdf>.
World Health Organisation. Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Spain, 2002.
<http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/67215/1/WHO_NMH_NPH_02.8.pdf>.
World Health Organisation. Elder Abuse: Fact Sheet No 357. 2015. <
http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs357/en/>.
World Health Organisation. Guyana: Country Profile. 2016.
<http://www.who.int/countries/guy/en/>.