+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Consultation Models

Consultation Models

Date post: 17-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: makani
View: 79 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Consultation Models. The Second Termers. Why the consultation?. Pivotal to everything we do as GPs Gives insight into doctor-patient relationship Likely to feature in every module of the exam Leads to better patient understanding, better concordance, fewer complaints. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Popular Tags:
29
Consultation Models The Second Termers
Transcript
Page 1: Consultation Models

Consultation Models

The Second Termers

Page 2: Consultation Models

Why the consultation?• Pivotal to everything we do as GPs• Gives insight into doctor-patient

relationship• Likely to feature in every module of the

exam• Leads to better patient understanding,

better concordance, fewer complaints

Page 3: Consultation Models

“Poor communication about illness causes more suffering than any other problem except unrelieved pain”.

Avril Stedeford - Facing Death 1984

Page 4: Consultation Models

Consulting in UK General Practice

• Average length of 7.5 minutes• Fastest in Europe• We will each do 200,000 during

out careers

Page 5: Consultation Models

Why model the consultation?

• We subconsciously make models for anything we do regularly

• By studying other peoples models we can develop our own

• Helps us understand patient’s perspective

• Make us safer and more thorough

Page 6: Consultation Models

Hospital Model• History• Examination• Investigations• Diagnosis• Management plan• Follow-up

Page 7: Consultation Models

What if we cannot make a diagnosis?What if a patient doesn’t like the

management plan?What if the patient has hidden agenda?What if the patient’s concerns are not

addressed?

Page 8: Consultation Models

Dr. Roger “Karl” Neighbour

• President of RCGP• The Inner

Consultation 1984• 5 checkpoints

Page 9: Consultation Models

• Connecting• Summarising• Safety netting• Handing over• Housekeeping

Page 10: Consultation Models

Connecting• Building rapport• Identify patients

views, beliefs and experiences

Page 11: Consultation Models

Summarising• Explaining back to the

patient what they have told you.

• Allows for correction, development of ideas/understanding

• Useful tool if things are not going well

Page 12: Consultation Models

Handing over• Agreeing on a

management plan• Giving ownership and

responsibility of that management plan to the patient

Page 13: Consultation Models

Safety-netting• Considering “what if?”• Can take form of follow-

up, what to do if problem continues, referral.

• For benefit of patient and the Dr.

Page 14: Consultation Models

Housekeeping• The Dr recognising

the importance of looking after oneself.

• Coffee, going for a walk, check score in the cricket.

Page 15: Consultation Models

Neighbour’s model Pros:• Good for acute

problems• Recognises

importance of Dr looking after himself

• Empowers patient

Cons:

•Dr centred

Page 16: Consultation Models

Helman’s “Folk Model”• 1981• Medical Anthropologist• Patients form a theory based on their

– Experience– Imagination– Peer group views

Page 17: Consultation Models

Helman’s “Folk Model”• WHAT has happened?• WHY has it happened?• Why to ME?• Why NOW?• What would happen if NOTHING DONE

about it?• What should I DO ABOUT IT or whom

should I consult?

Page 18: Consultation Models

Helman’s “Folk Model”Pros:• Very patient

centred• Patient

satisfaction

Cons:• Time• Hard to apply to

certain situations e.g. severe mental health, elderly, emergencies.

Page 19: Consultation Models

Transactional Analysis• 1964 Eric Berne• Parent

– Critical or caring

• Adult– Logical

• Child– dependent

Page 20: Consultation Models

Transactional AnalysisPros:• Important to be

aware of role• Attempt to break

patterns of behaviour

Cons:• Not always

relevant

Page 21: Consultation Models

Stott & Davis• 1979• 4 areas can be

systematically explored each time a patient consults

Page 22: Consultation Models

Stott & Davis• Management of the PRESENTING

PROBLEM• Modification of HEALTH SEEKING

BEHAVIOURS• Management of CONTINUING

PROBLEMS• Opportunistic HEALTH PROMOTION

Page 23: Consultation Models

Stott & DavisPros:• QOF• Long term

benefits of modifying behaviour

Cons:• May miss

psychological problems

• No account of patient’s health beliefs

Page 24: Consultation Models

Pendleton et al• 1984, 2003• 7 tasks

Page 25: Consultation Models

Pendleton et al• DEFINE the reason for attendance

• Consider OTHER PROBLEMS

• With the patient chose an APPROPRIATE ACTION for each problem

Page 26: Consultation Models

Pendleton et al• Achieve a SHARED UNDERSTANDING of the

problems with the pt

• INVOLVE the pt in management decisions & encourage to TAKE RESPONSIBILITY

• Use TIME & RESOURCES appropriately

• ESTABLISH or maintain a RELATIONSHIP with the pt

Page 27: Consultation Models

PENDLETON1. Define the reason for the patient’s attendance,

including:• Nature and history of problem• Their aetiology• Ideas concerns and expectations• Effects of the problem

2. Consider other problems:• Continuing problems• At risk problems

3. With the patient, to choose an appropriate action for each problem.

4. To achieve a shared understanding of the problems with the patient.

5. To involve the patient in the management and encourage him to accept appropriate responsibility

6. To use time and resources appropriately:• In the consultation• In the long term

7. To establish or maintain a relationship with the patient which helps to achieve the other tasks

Page 28: Consultation Models

Pendleton et alPros:• Pt centred• Ideas, concerns,

expectations• Encourages pt

responsibility• Basis for

summative assessment videos

Cons:• Emergencies

Page 29: Consultation Models

In summary• Numerous models• Apply to different consultations• Important to know NEIGHBOUR &

PENDLETON plus one other


Recommended