Consultation on Funded D
ecomm
issioning Program
me G
uidance for New
Nuclear P
ower S
tations
Printed in the UK on recycled paper containing a minimum of 75% post consumer wasteDepartment for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. www.berr.gov.uk
First published February 2008. © Crown copyright. Pub 8702/0.2k/02/08/NP. URN 08/637
7504-BERR-Nuclear Waste Decommissioning-COVER 20/2/08 16:55 Page 1
Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme Guidance for New Nuclear Power Stations
FEBRUARY 2008
THE ENERGY BILL 2008
Consultation on Funded D
ecomm
issioning Program
me G
uidance for New
Nuclear P
ower S
tations
Consultation on Funded Decommissioning ProgrammeGuidance for New Nuclear Power Stations
FEBRUARY 2008
THE ENERGY BILL 2008
7504-BERR-Nuclear Waste Decommissioning-COVER 20/2/08 16:55 Page 1
Printed in the UK on recycled paper containing a minimum of 75% post consumer waste Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform. www.berr.gov.uk
First published February 2008. © Crown copyright. Pub 8702/0.2k/02/08/NP. URN 08/637
1
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Introduction
•ExecutiveSummary 3
•HowtoRespond 5
Section 1: Background
•TheGovernment’sconclusiononthefutureofnuclearpower 9
•FormationoftheNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard(NLFAB) 11
Section 2: Fixing a price and schedule for the disposal of intermediate level waste and spent fuel (higher activity waste) from new nuclear power stations
•Fulldecommissioningcosts 13
•Fullshareofwastemanagementcosts 14
•Roadmaptosetoutanindicativetimelineforpublicationofcostestimatesforwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningandafixedunitpriceforwastedisposal 18
Section 3: Financing decommissioning, waste management and waste disposal from new nuclear power stations
•SettingaframeworkthroughtheEnergyBill 27
•RegulationsundertheEnergyBill 32
•GuidanceundertheEnergyBill 34
•IndicativeprocessforsubmittingandfollowingaFundedDecommissioningProgramme 37
Contents
2
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section 4: Decommissioning and Waste Management Plan guidance 41
Section 5: Funding Arrangements Plan guidance 81
Annex A: Reporting requirements 118
Annex B: The Consultation Code of Practice Criteria 121
1 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January20082 EnergyBill,Session2007-08,Bill5307-08
Why is BERR conducting this consultation?
It was announced in the Nuclear White Paper 20081 that, in parallel with the Energy Bill2, the Government will publish for public consultation two sets of draft guidance on what an approvable Funded Decommissioning Programme should contain. This consultation document contains both sets of draft guidance and seeks views on the guidance.
Issued on: 22February2008
Respond by: 16May2008
Enquiries to: GuidanceConsultation,NuclearUnit DepartmentforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReform Bay125,1VictoriaStreet,LondonSW1H0ET
Tel: 02072153331
Fax: 02072152842
Email: [email protected]
3
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Introduction
executive Summary
ThisconsultationfollowsthepublicationoftheWhitePaperonNuclearPower1 inJanuary2008,whichannouncedtheGovernment’sformalresponsetotheconsultationonthefutureofnuclearpower.
TheNuclearWhitePaper2 3statedthat:
“The Government believes it is in the public interest that new nuclear power stations should have a role to play in this country’s future energy mix alongside other low-carbon sources; that it would be in the public interest to allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations; and that the Government should take active steps to open up the way to the construction of new nuclear power stations. It will be for energy companies to fund, develop and build new nuclear power stations in the UK, including meeting the full costs of decommissioning and their full share of waste management costs.”
TheGovernmentalsoconfirmeditscommitmenttoputinplacelegislative3 arrangementstoensurethatoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationshavesecurefinancingarrangementsinplacetomeetthefullcostsofdecommissioningandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementcosts.ClausesintheEnergyBill20084createtheframeworkforthis.TheEnergyBillwillrequireanyoperatorofanewnuclearpowerstationtohaveaFundedDecommissioningProgramme,approvedbytheSecretaryofState,inplacebeforeconstructionofanewnuclearpowerstationbeginsandtocomplywiththisprogrammethereafter.TheFundedDecommissioningProgrammepreparedbytheoperatorofanewnuclearpowerstationmustinclude:
provisionforthestepsnecessarytodecommissiontheinstallationand●●
manageanddisposeofhazardouswaste;
anestimateofthecostsoftakingthosesteps;and●●
detailsofanysecuritytobeprovidedinrelationtothosecosts.●●
ItwasalsoannouncedintheNuclearWhitePaperthat,inparallelwiththe4 EnergyBill,theGovernmentwouldpublishforpublicconsultationtwosetsofdraftguidanceonwhataFundedDecommissioningProgramme(FDP)shouldcontain.
3 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January20084 EnergyBill,Session2007-08,Bill5307-08
4
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5 ThisguidancewillassistoperatorsinunderstandingtheirobligationsundertheEnergyBill,andwhatisrequiredforanapprovableFundedDecommissioningProgramme.TheguidanceisnotintendedtobeundulyprescriptivebutinsteadtosetoutprincipleswhichtheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttoseesatisfiedintheFundedDecommissioningProgrammepreparedbyanoperator.Theguidancegivesinformationonwaysinwhichtheoperatormightsatisfythoseprinciples.
6 Thefirstsetofguidance(DecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanguidance)willassistoperatorsinsettingoutandcostingthestepsinvolvedindecommissioninganewnuclearpowerstationandmanaginganddisposingofhazardouswasteandspentfuelinawaywhichtheSecretaryofStatemayapprove.ThisguidancealsosetsoutthecostmodellingmethodologytheGovernmentexpectstousetogenerateitsownprudentestimatesofthecostsofdecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalfornewnuclearpowerstations.
7 ThisconsultationdocumentalsocontainsaRoadmapthatsetsoutanindicativetimelineunderwhichtheGovernmentexpectstopublishitscostestimatesandtobeinapositiontosetafixedunitpriceforwastedisposal.ThisRoadmap(setoutinSection2ofthisdocument)isincludedforinformationonlyandviewsarenotrequestedonit.
8 Thesecondsetofguidance(FundingArrangementPlanguidance)willassistoperatorsinsettingoutacceptablefinancingproposalstomeetthecostsidentified.ItsetsouttheGuidingPrinciplesagainstwhichtheGovernmentwillassessthefundingproposalssubmittedbyoperatorsaspartoftheirFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforapprovalundertheEnergyBill.
Consultation Questions
Question 1
Do you agree or disagree that the Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance adequately sets out what an approvable Funded Decommissioning Programme should contain in order to meet the government’s objective that operators of new nuclear power stations meet the full costs of decommissioning and their full share of waste management costs? What are your reasons? Do you have any other comments on the two sets of guidance?
Question 2
Does the draft guidance contain sufficient information to enable operators of new nuclear power stations to understand the matters that their Funded Decommissioning Programme should contain?
5
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Question 3
Do you agree or disagree that the Base Case sets out a realistic and prudent way to estimate the potential costs of waste management and decommissioning. What are your reasons?
Question 4
Do you agree or disagree that the Funding Arrangements Plan guidance sets out a prudent way to ensure that operators make adequate provision for meeting their liabilities? What are your reasons?
how to respond
Wewanttohearfrommembersofthepublic,industry,financialandother9 institutionsthatmaybeinvolvedinthefinancingofnewnuclearpowerstations,non-governmentalorganisationsandanyotherorganisationorbodywithaninterest.
Weareseekingviewsonthedraftguidancebeforeitisfinalisedfollowing10 RoyalAssentoftheEnergyBill.ThedraftguidanceissetoutinSections4and5ofthisdocument.Sections1-3areforinformationandwearenotseekingcommentsonthesesections.
Theconsultationbeganon22February2008andwillcloseonFriday16May11 2008.
Aresponsecanbesubmittedbyletter,faxoremail(emailpreferred)to:12
Guidanceconsultation,NuclearUnitDepartmentforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReformBay125,1VictoriaStreet,London,SW1H0ETTel:02072153331Fax:02072152842Email:[email protected]
Additional points about this consultation
Whenresponding,pleasestatewhetheryouarerespondingasanindividual13 orrepresentingtheviewsofanorganisation.Ifyouarerespondingonbehalfofanorganisation,pleasemakeitclearwhotheorganisationrepresentsand,whereapplicable,howyouassembledtheviewsofmembers.
ThedeadlineforresponsesisFriday16May2008.14
6
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Confidentiality and Data Protection
YourresponsemaybemadepublicbyBERR.Ifyoudonotwantyourname15 orallorpartofyourresponsemadepublic,pleasestatethisclearlyintheresponse.Anyconfidentialitydisclaimerthatmaybegeneratedbyyourorganisations’ITsystemorincludedasageneralstatementinyourfaxcoversheetwillbetakentoapplyonlytoinformationinyourresponseforwhichconfidentialityhasbeenspecificallyrequested.
Informationprovidedinresponsetothisconsultation,includingpersonal16 information,maybesubjecttopublicationordisclosureinaccordancewiththeaccesstoinformationregimes(theseareprimarilytheFreedomofInformationAct2000(FOIA),theDataProtectionAct1998(DPA)andtheEnvironmentalInformationRegulations2004).
Ifyouwantotherinformationthatyouprovidetobetreatedasconfidential,17 pleasebeawarethat,undertheFOIA,thereisastatutoryCodeofPracticewithwhichpublicauthoritiesmustcomplyandwhichdeals,amongstotherthings,withobligationsofconfidence.
Inviewofthisitwouldbehelpfulifyoucouldexplaintouswhyyouregard18 theinformationyouhaveprovidedasconfidential.Ifwereceivearequestfordisclosureoftheinformationwewilltakefullaccountofyourexplanation,butwecannotgiveanassurancethatconfidentialitycanbemaintainedinallcircumstances.
TheDepartmentwillprocessyourpersonaldatainaccordancewiththeDPA19 andinthemajorityofcircumstancesthiswillmeanthatyourpersonaldatawillnotbedisclosedtothirdparties.
Additional copies
Youmaymakecopiesofthisdocumentwithoutseekingpermission.An20 electronicversioncanbefoundat:http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/nuclear-whitepaper/consultations/page44523.html
Help with queries
Pleaseemail21 [email protected].
7
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Ifyouhavecommentsorcomplaintsaboutthewaythisconsultationhasbeen22 conducted,theseshouldbesentto:
VanessaSinghateh,ConsultationCo-ordinatorDepartmentforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReformBetterRegulationTeam1VictoriaStreetLondonSW1H0ETE-mail:[email protected]:02072152293Fax:02072152235
TheGovernment’sCodeofPracticeonConsultationissetoutatAnnexB.23
Next Steps
TheresultsofthisconsultationexercisewillbepublishedontheBERR24 website.
Followingthisconsultation,andaftertheEnergyBillhasachievedRoyal25 Assent,theGovernmentwillfinalisethetwosetsofguidancepublishedhereindraftandwilllaythembeforeParliamentasStatutoryGuidance.
ItiscurrentlyenvisagedundertheEnergyBillthattheSecretaryofState26 willmakeanumberofordersaftertheBillhasachievedRoyalAssent.Furtherinformationissetoutinparagraphs3.22–3.33.
8
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
9
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section1:Background
Thissectionsetsoutthebackgroundtotheguidancewhichisthesubjectof1.1 theconsultation,tosetitinthewidercontextoftheGovernment’senergystrategyandtodescriberelevantpoliciesonmanagingradioactivewastesafely.Itisprovidedhereforinformationonly.
The government’s conclusion on the future of nuclear power
TheNuclearWhitePaper1.2 5setouttheGovernment’sformalresponsetotheconsultationonthefutureofnuclearpower.Itstateditsoverallconclusionasfollows:
“The Government has taken its decision to allow new nuclear power stations 1.3 to be built against the very challenging backdrop of climate change and threats to our energy security. The Government’s conclusion is that nuclear power is:
Low-carbon – helping to minimise damaging climate change●●
Affordable – nuclear is currently one of the cheapest low-carbon electricity ●●
generation technologies, so could help us deliver our goals cost effectively
Dependable – a proven technology with modern reactors capable of ●●
producing electricity reliably
Safe – backed up by a highly effective regulatory framework●●
Capable of increasing diversity and reducing our dependence on any one ●●
technology or country for our energy or fuel supplies.
On this basis, the Government believes that it is in the public interest that new nuclear power stations should have a role to play in this country’s future energy mix alongside other low-carbon sources; that it would be in the public interest to allow energy companies the option of investing in new nuclear power stations; and that the Government should take active steps to open up the way to the construction of new nuclear power stations. It will be for energy companies to fund, develop and build new nuclear power stations in the UK, including meeting the full costs of decommissioning and their full share of waste management costs6.”
5 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January20086 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
10
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
IntheNuclearWhitePapertheGovernmentsetoutitsconclusiononwaste1.4 anddecommissioning:
“Having reviewed the arguments and evidence put forward, the Government believes that it is technically possible to dispose of new higher-activity radioactive waste in a geological disposal facility and that this would be a viable solution and the right approach for managing waste from any new nuclear power stations. The Government considers that it would be technically possible and desirable to dispose of both new and legacy waste in the same geological disposal facilities and that this should be explored through the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely programme. The Government considers that waste can and should be stored in safe and secure interim storage facilities until a geological facility becomes available.
Our policy is that before development consents for new nuclear power stations are granted, the Government will need to be satisfied that effective arrangements exist or will exist to manage and dispose of the waste they will produce.
The Government also believes that the balance of ethical considerations does not rule out the option of new nuclear power stations7.”
TheNuclearWhitePaperalsosetoutaGovernmentstatementontheMRWS1.5 processandgeologicaldisposal8.
IntheNuclearWhitePaper,theGovernmentconfirmeditscommitmentto1.6 putinplacelegislativearrangementstoensurethatoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationshavesecurefinancingarrangementsinplacetomeetthefullcostsofdecommissioningandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementcosts.ClausesintheEnergyBillcreatetheframeworkforthisrequirement.ThiswillbeachievedbyrequiringanyoperatorofanewnuclearpowerstationtohaveaFundedDecommissioningProgramme,approvedbytheSecretaryofState,inplacebeforeconstructionofanewnuclearpowerstationbeginsandtocomplywiththisprogrammethereafter.
TheGovernmenthasdeterminedthatindependentfunds,outsideof1.7 thecontrolofoperators,shouldbecreatedtoaccumulateandmanagepaymentstomeetthefullcostsofdecommissioningandfullshareofwastemanagementcosts.Thisapproachwouldbetransparentandwouldbeconsistentwiththepolicyofensuringthatoperators,nottheGovernment,takefullresponsibilityformeetingthecostsofdecommissioning,wastemanagementanddisposal.
TheSecretaryofStateforTradeandIndustry(nowSecretaryofStatefor1.8 Business,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReform)appointedDrTimStone,aseniorfinancierwithexperienceofmajorcapitalinvestmentprojects,inJanuary2007,toadvisetheGovernmentonfinancingthecostsofdecommissioning
7 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,page99,URN08/525,January20088 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,Box3,page94,URN08/525,January2008
11
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
andwastemanagementanddisposalcostsfornewnuclearpowerstations.DrStonereportstotheSecretaryofStateforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReformandtheChiefSecretarytotheTreasury.
Formation of the nuclear liabilities Financing Assurance Board (nlFAB)
IntheNuclearWhitePaper,theGovernmentannounceditsintentiontocreate1.9 anewindependentadvisorybody,theNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard(NLFAB).ThisnewboardwillprovideindependentscrutinyandadviceonthesuitabilityoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammessubmittedbyoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstations,preparedwiththeaidoftheguidancewhichisthesubjectofthisconsultation.
TheNLFABwilladvisetheSecretaryofStateforBusiness,Enterpriseand1.10 RegulatoryReformonthefinancialarrangementsthatoperatorssubmitforapproval.TheNLFABwillalsoprovideadvicetotheSecretaryofStateontheregularreviewsandongoingscrutinyoffundingarrangements.
TheNLFABisexpectedtoconsistofexpertsfromrelevantfieldssuchas1.11 currentorformerfundmanagers,pensiontrustees,actuariesandnuclearspecialists.TheboardmemberswillbeappointedbytheSecretaryofState.
TheNLFABwillbeapurelyadvisorybodyandwillhaveatightlydefined1.12 scopefocusedsolelyonadvisingwhetherthefinancialarrangementsputinplacebyoperatorsfordecommissioningandwastemanagementanddisposalaresufficientlyrobust.TheadviceoftheNLFABwithrespecttoFundedDecommissioningProgrammeswillbemadepublic,buttheSecretaryofStatewillretainresponsibilityfortheactualapproval(orrejection)ofprogrammes.
Itisexpectedthat,inscrutinisingtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammes,1.13 theNLFABwillmakeuseofexistingregulators’expertise.
Forinformation,wesetoutinTable1anindicativetimetableforthecreationof1.14 theNLFAB.
Table 1: Indicative timetable for creation of the Nuclear Liabilities Financing Assurance Board
Q22008 PublicationoftheNLFABTermsofReference
Q2/Q32008 Beginrecruitingprocess
Q42008/Q12009
FormationofNLFAB
Initialmeetingoftheboard
AvailabletoadviseSecretaryofStatefollowingthesubmissionofFundedDecommissioningProgrammesbyoperators
12
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
13
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section2:Fixingapriceandscheduleforthedisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel(higheractivitywaste)fromnewnuclearpowerstations
ThissectionsetsoutbackgroundinformationontheGovernment’spolicy2.1 tosetafixedunitpriceforoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsfordisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel,andaschedulefortheGovernment9totaketitletoandliabilityforthesematerials.Thissectionisforinformationonlyandviewsarenotsoughtonitaspartoftheconsultation.FurtherinformationonmanyoftheissuesraisedinthissectionisincludedinSections4and5ofthisdocument,whichpresentthetwosetsofdraftguidanceforconsultation.
Full decommissioning costs
TheNuclearWhitePapersetdownthat2.2 “It is the Government’s policy that the owners and operators of new nuclear power stations must set aside funds over the generating life of the power station to cover the full costs of decommissioning and their full share of waste management and disposal costs10.”
Toprovidefurtherclarification,theGovernmentconsidersthatfull2.3 decommissioningcostsarethecostsof:
dismantlingthenuclearpowerstationattheendofitsgeneratinglife●●
removingallstationbuildingsandfacilitiesandreturningthesitetoastate●●
agreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthorityandreleasedfromthecontrolofthenuclearsitelicence.Thisislikelytobeastatesimilarto“Greenfield”,dependingonthestateofthesitepriortoconstructionofthestation.
9 InthissectionreferencestotheGovernmentinthecontextofsettingafixedunitpriceforwastedisposalandaschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforsuchwasteshouldbereadasreferencestocentralGovernmentandotherbodiesactingonbehalfofandfundedbycentralGovernment.
10 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
14
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Operatorswillberequiredtoproducerobustestimatesofthecostsof2.4 decommissioningandtoensurethatsufficientfundsaresetasideinanindependentFundtomeetthecostsastheyfalldue.
Full share of waste management costs
Toprovidefurtherclarification,theGovernmentconsidersthatanoperator’s2.5 fullshareofwastemanagementcostsis:
thecoststhataredirectlyattributabletodisposingofnewbuildhigher●●
activitywasteintoageologicaldisposalfacility;
acontributiontowardsthefixedcostsofconstructingsuchageological●●
disposalfacility;
asignificantriskpremiumoverandabovethesecoststotakeaccountof●●
uncertaintiesaroundthecostofconstructingsuchafacilityandthetimewhenitwillbeabletoacceptnewbuildwaste;and
thecostofmanagingthatwastependingdisposal(orpendingtransferfor●●
disposal).
Separately,operatorsarealsoresponsibleforthefullcostofdisposingoflow2.6 levelwasteinadisposalfacilityandmanagingthiswastependingitsdisposal.
TheGovernmentismodellingthefinancialimpactofaddingwastefromnew2.7 nuclearpowerstationstoageologicaldisposalfacilitythatwouldotherwisebedesignedtoholdonlytheUK’sexistingnuclearwasteinventory.Ourmodellingtakesintoaccounttheadditionaldirectcosts;forexample,throughneedingtoconstructadditionalundergroundcavernstoacceptwastefromnewnuclearpowerstations.Wewillthenconsiderwhichotheritemsofcosttheadditionofwastefromnewnuclearpowerstationsmightaffectlessdirectly.Inthisway,wewillbeinapositiontoensurethatthepricethatoperatorspayfordisposaloftheirhigher-activitywastesintheGovernment-providedgeologicaldisposalfacilityreflectstheirfullshareofthecostsofaddingwastefromnewnuclearpowerstationstothisfacility.Thesecostswillincludeaproportionofthefixedcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacility.Weareworkingonamethodologytodeterminehowthefixedcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacilityshouldbeapportionedtoandsharedbetweenoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstations.Ourmethodologyfordefiningthe“fullshareofcosts”willaddresstheissueofquantifyingtheseindirectcostsindeterminingthecontributionthatoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsoughttomake.
TheRoadmap,inparagraphs2.25–2.32andTable2,setsoutanindicative2.8 timelineforwhenmoredetailonhowtheGovernmentwilldeterminethecontributionsthatoperatorsshouldmaketomeettheirfullshareofwastemanagementcostsisexpectedtobeavailable.Theindicativetimelinealsoshowswhenweexpecttobeinapositiontopublishupdatedestimatesofthetotalcostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning,andamethodolodgyforestablishingafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofintermediate
15
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
levelwasteandspentfuel.Theindicativetimelineisbeingincludedforinformationonlyandwearenotseekingcommentsonitthroughthisconsultation.
Clarity on the costs for disposal of waste and spent fuel from new nuclear power stations in a Government facility
IntheNuclearWhitePaper2.9 11,wesaidthatpotentialinvestorsinnewnuclearpowerstationsneedclarityonthemaximumamountthattheywouldbeexpectedtopayfortheGovernmenttotakeresponsibilityfortheirfuturewasteinageologicaldisposalfacility.Thiscostcertaintywouldenablethemtotakeinvestmentdecisionsandseekfinancing.Energycompanieshaveindicatedthattheywouldbepreparedtopayasignificantriskpremiumoverandabovetheexpectedcostsofdisposingofwasteandspentfuel,inreturnforhavingthecertaintyofafixedupperprice.
TheGovernmentwouldexpecttosetafixedunitpricebasedontheoperator’s2.10 projectedfullshareofwastedisposalcostsatthetimewhentheapprovalsforthestationaregiven,priortoconstructionofthestation.TheGovernmentwouldexpecttosetafixedpriceperunitofintermediatelevelwasteorspentfuelfordisposal,toensurethattheamountthatoperatorspayisrelativetotheamountofwasteorspentfueltheyproduce.Thispricewillbesetataleveloverandaboveexpectedcostsandwillincludeasignificantriskpremium.Thisriskpremiumshouldhelptoensurethattheoperatorbearstherisksarounduncertaintyinwastecostsandwillprovidethetaxpayerwithmaterialprotectionagainsttheeventualitythattheactualcostsofgeologicaldisposalexceedtheprojectedcosts.Shouldtheactualcostsofprovidingthewastedisposalserviceprovelowerthanexpected,theselowercostswillnotbepassedontonuclearoperators,whowouldhavegainedfromcertaintyofafixedpriceandwouldnothavebeenexposedtotheriskofpriceescalation.
ThefixedunitpricetheGovernmentwillsetforoperatorsforwastedisposal2.11 willreflectthemostuptodateestimatesofcostsavailableatthedatewhenthepriceissetandthelevelofcertaintytheGovernmenthasonthosecosts.Consequently,dependentuponthedateofthenuclearpowerstation’sconstruction,operatorsofdifferentpowerstationsmaybesetdifferentfixedunitpricesforwastedisposal.Thefixedunitpricewillbeescalatedovertimeinlinewith,forexample,inflation.
Thefixedunitpricewillbeforthedisposalofintermediatelevelwastefrom2.12 operationsanddecommissioningandofspentfuel.Thedisposaloflowlevelwastewillnotbepartofthefixedunitpriceservice.Operatorswillberesponsibleformakingtheirownarrangementsforthedisposaloflowlevelwastefromoperationsanddecommissioningandwillberequiredtomeetthesecostsfromoperationalexpenditureforoperationallowlevelwaste,andfromtheFundfordecommissioninglowlevelwaste.
11 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
16
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
WeanticipatethatoperatorswillrequestthattheGovernmentprovide2.13 themwithafixedunitpriceatthetimetheyseekapprovalfortheirFundedDecommissioningProgramme.Thiswilloccuralongsidetheregulators’licensingandpermittingprocesses.Atthistime,theSecretaryofStatewouldusethecostmodellingmethodologyithasdeveloped,togetherwithinformationfromtheNDA’sparametriccostmodellingworkontheestimatedcostsofdisposalfacilities,todeterminethefixedunitprice,includingtheappropriateriskpremium.Thecostmodellingmethodologyisdescribedingreaterdetailatparagraphs4.5.1–4.5.39andfurtherinformationonwhenweexpecttobeinapositiontosetafixedunitpriceforoperatorsissetoutintheRoadmapparagraphs2.25–2.32andTable2.Tohelpfutureoperatorswiththeirplanning,theGovernmentwouldexpecttogiveoperatorsanon-bindingindicativepriceatanearlierdatethanwhentheGovernmentwouldbewillingtoprovidethemwithafinalfixedunitprice.
Clarity on when operators will be able to pass title to and liability for their waste and spent fuel to the Government
Potentialinvestorsinnewnuclearpowerstationsalsoneedcertaintyoverthe2.14 dateatwhichtheywilltransfertitletoandliabilityfortheirintermediatelevelwasteandspentfueltotheGovernmentfordisposal.
TheGovernmentwillagreetotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’swaste2.15 accordingtoaschedulethatwillbeagreedatthesametimeastheoperator’sFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisapprovedandalongsidesettingafixedunitpriceforthewastedisposalservice.Wewouldexpectthescheduletobealignedtotheestimatesforavailabilityofdisposalfacilities(whateverthoseestimatesareatthetimeoperatorscometotheGovernmentforafirmviewonafixedunitprice).Weexpectthattransferoftitleandliabilitywouldnotbeginuntilaftertheoperator’sdecommissioningprogrammehasotherwisebeencompleted.Firmestimatesofdatesforconstructionofdisposalfacilitiesarenotyetavailable;howevergreaterclaritywillemergeastheManagingRadioactiveWasteSafely(MRWS)programmeproceeds.
Aswithsettingafixedunitprice,tohelpoperatorswiththeirplanning,2.16 theGovernmentwouldexpecttogiveoperatorsanon-bindingindicativescheduleatanearlierdatethanwhentheyapproachtheGovernmentforfirmagreement.TheschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforintermediatelevelwasteisexpectedtobedifferenttotheschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforspentfuel.
Inreturnforgivingoperatorscertaintyoverwhentheywilltransfertitletoand2.17 liabilityfortheirwasteandspentfueltotheGovernment,wewillsettheleveloftheriskpremiumtotakeaccountoftherisktotheGovernmentthattheconstructionofdisposalfacilitiesisnotcompletebythedateordatesspecifiedintheagreedschedule.Thisriskpremiumwillbebuiltintothefixedunitpriceforthewastedisposalservice.
17
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Ifgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesarenotavailablebythedatesagreedinthe2.18 schedule,theGovernmentwouldexpecttotaketitletoandliabilityforthewasteaccordingtotheagreedscheduleandwouldexpecttocontinuestoringitonthesitewhereithashithertobeenstoreduntildisposalfacilitiesareavailable.WeexpectthatthisstoragewillbeonthesiteofthepowerstationasassumedintheBaseCase(seeparagraph4.1.9).ThiscouldmeanthattheGovernmentmayneedtosecurethelicensingofthepartoftheoperator’ssitewheretheinterimstoresarelocated.Inthiscase,theoperatorshouldbeabletopursuede-licensingoftheremainderofitssitewiththeregulators.Operatorsmaywishtoconsiderthispossibilitywhenconsideringthedesignoftheirsite,andinparticularwhetherservicesfortheirinterimstoreswillbesharedwiththerestoftheirsite.TheGovernmentwouldmeetcostsformaintainingtheinterimstoresduringthisperiodfromtheriskpremiumincludedinthefixedunitprice.TheGovernmentwillexpecttobasethescheduleonconservativeestimatesoftheavailabilityofgeologicaldisposalfacilities,tominimisetheriskthattheGovernmentwillneedtotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’sintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelbeforedisposalfacilitiesareavailabletodisposeofthesematerials.
Conversely,iftheoperatorisnotinapositiontosenditswastefordisposal2.19 inaccordancewiththeagreedschedule,itwillremainresponsible(includingfinancially)formaintainingtheongoingmanagementofthewasteuntilitisinapositiontodisposeofthewasteandtheoperatorofthedisposalfacilityisabletofindanothertimeslottoreceivethatwaste.
TheBaseCasereferredtoatparagraph4.1.9assumesa40yeargeneratinglife2.20 fornewnuclearpowerstations.ThisisasensibleassumptionandoperatorswouldbeexpectedtotakeaccountofitintheirFundedDecommissioningProgramme,althoughitwillbeopentooperatorstosuggestalternativestationlifetimes.IfoperatorswishtomodifytheirProgrammeduringthegeneratingperiodtoextendthelifeofthestationbeyondthat40yearperiod,thenaswellasneedingtheagreementoftheregulatorstothechangeandtheapprovalofSecretaryofStatetomodifytheirProgramme,theywillneedtorevisitthescheduletodetermineandhavetheSecretaryofStateapprovewhentheGovernmentwilltaketitletoandliabilityforthewaste.
Althoughweexpectthatarevisedschedulewouldbeagreedwiththeoperator2.21 atthetimeoftheapplicationforastation’slifeextension,weexpectthat,ifdisposalfacilitiesareavailable,theintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelfromthefirst40yearsofoperationswouldbesentfordisposalatthetimeagreedintheoriginalschedule.Decommissioningwasteandtheadditionalspentfuelfromtheextendedstationlifetimewouldbedisposedofoncethestationhasbeendecommissionedandaccordingtodatesagreedaspartoftherevisedschedule.
Ifnodisposalfacilitieswereavailableatthistime,thewasteandspentfuel2.22 fromthefirst40yearsofoperationswouldremainintheoperator’sinterimstoresuntildisposalfacilitiesareavailableandthestationhascompleteditsextendedgenerationperiodandhasbeendecommissioned.Ifdisposal
18
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
facilitieswerestillnotavailableatthistime,theGovernmentwouldexpecttotaketitletoandliabilityfortheoperator’swasteandspentfuelatthispointinaccordancewithparagraph2.18.
TheGovernmentmayalsowanttosetanewpriceforthedisposalofthe2.23 additionalspentfuel.Itwouldexpecttodothisatthetimetheoperatorseeksapprovalforthemodificationstoitsprogramme.Anewpricewouldbeset,basedonthemostuptodateestimatesoftheactualcostsofdisposal.Wearenotrulingoutthepossibilitythatoperatorsmaywishtonegotiateupfrontapriceforwastefor,say,60yearsofoperation;forexample,bytakinganoptionontheadditional20yearsworthofspentfuel.ThiswouldrequiretheapprovaloftheSecretaryofState.
Theapproachdescribedabovetosetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalof2.24 intermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelandtoagreeaschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilitytothesematerialswillbetestedwiththefinancialindustryandwillbesubjecttoensuringcompliancewithEUStateAidlaw.
roadmap to set out an indicative timeline for publication of cost estimates for waste management, disposal and decommissioning and a fixed unit price for waste disposal
Theindicativetimelinebelowsetsoutwhenfurtherdetailonthecostsand2.25 paymentsforwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningfornewnuclearpowerstationswillbepublished.Thistimelineisforinformationonlyandwearenotseekingcommentsonitthroughtheconsultation.
Updated estimates of the likely total costs for waste management, disposal and decommissioning
Toderiverobustupdatedestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagement2.26 anddecommissioningfornewnuclearpowerstations,theGovernmentisdevelopingacostmodelthatwillenableittoproducearangeoflikelycosts,aswellasgivingtheGovernmentinformationonthelevelofcertaintyofthosecosts.Paragraphs4.5.1–4.5.39setoutforconsultationthecostmodellingmethodologythattheGovernmentproposestousetodevelopestimatesofthesecosts.
Operatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationswillbeexpectedtocalculatetheir2.27 owncostestimatesforwastemanagement,disposaloflowlevelwasteanddecommissioningforinclusionintheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP)theywillsubmittotheSecretaryofState.OperatorswillalsobeexpectedtosubmittotheSecretaryofStatetheirestimatesofthevolumesofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelthattheirstationwillproducethroughoutitsgeneratinglifeandfromdecommissioning.Operators’ownestimateswilldifferfromthoseproducedbytheGovernment
19
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
astheywillbespecifictothenuclearpowerreactordesign,siteandotheroperationaldecisionsoftheoperator,ratherthangeneric.
Wearenotsettingoutcostestimatesatthisstage.Theindicative2.28 timelineinTable2setsoutwhenweexpecttobeinapositiontopublishupdatedestimatesofthetotalcostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.
A methodology for establishing a fixed unit price for the disposal of intermediate level waste and spent fuel in a geological disposal facility
AssetoutintheNuclearWhitePaper2.29 12andinparagraphs2.9–2.13ofthisconsultation,theGovernmentwillprovidecertaintytooperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsonthecostsofdisposingoftheirintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel,bysettingafixedunitpriceforthisservice.Inreturnforthiscertainty,theGovernmentwillincludeinthefixedunitpriceasignificantriskpremiumsetoverandaboveexpectedcoststohelpensurethattheoperatorbearstherisksarounduncertaintyinwastedisposalcostsandtoprovidethetaxpayerwithmaterialprotection.
TheGovernmentexpectstodeterminetheappropriatelevelforthefixed2.30 unitprice,drawingonthecostmodellingworkcarriedoutbyBERRandbytheNuclearDecommissioningAuthority(NDA).Weplantopublishfurtherinformationonthemethodologywewillusetodeterminethefixedunitprice,assetoutinTable2.
A methodology for determining the contributions that operators should make to meet their full share of waste management costs
TheGovernmenthasstatedaspolicy2.31 13thatoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsmustsetasidefundsoverthegeneratinglifeofthepowerstationtocovertheirfullshareofwastemanagementanddisposalcosts.
Weareworkingonamethodologytodeterminehowthefixedcostsof2.32 buildingageologicaldisposalfacilityshouldbeapportionedtoandsharedbetweenoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstations14.Theindicativetimelinesetsoutwhenweexpectthismethodologytobeavailable.Thismethodologywillhelpdeterminethecontributionswhichoperatorsshouldmaketomeettheirfullshareofthecostsofwastedisposal.Determinationofanoperator’sfullshareofwastedisposalcostswillinformthefixedunitpricethattheGovernmentwillsetfordisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel.
12 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January200813 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January200814 ThisbreakdownofcostspresupposesdisposalofhigheractivitynewbuildwasteinaUKgeologicaldisposal
facilitybuiltbyoronbehalfoftheGovernment.IntheeventthatalternativewastedisposalstrategieswereputforwardbyoperatorsandwereacceptabletotheSecretaryofStateanassessmentofthefullshareofwastedisposalcostssoincurredwouldfalltobedeterminedonacasebycasebasis.
20
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Table 2: Indicative timeline for publication of cost estimates for waste management, disposal and decommissioning and a fixed unit price for waste disposal
Indicative ActionDate
2008 ● Publish for consultation: cost modelling methodology Q1–Q2 for estimating the costs of waste management, disposal
and decommissioning, and Funded Programme guidance.
2008 ● DeFrA to publish White Paper on Managing Q2–Q3 radioactive Waste Safely and invite communities to
express an interest in discussions about potential involvement in the siting process.
● nDA develop their parametric cost modelling exercise so that outputs can be incorporated in Berr’s cost modelling.
● Methodology to determine how the fixed costs of building a geological disposal facility should be apportioned to and shared between operators of new nuclear power stations is expected to be made available.
2008 ● Publish consultation responses and government Q3–Q4 response on the Berr website. ● Develop further refined cost estimates. ● Undertake an external peer review of Berr’s
cost model. ● Test the price methodology for establishing an
indicative fixed unit price for the disposal of intermediate level waste and spent fuel with the financial industry.
2008 Q4– ● Publish finalised guidance on an acceptable Funded 2009 Q1 Decommissioning Programme. ● Publish cost model with our updated estimates of
total costs for waste management, disposal and decommissioning.
● Publish methodology for establishing an indicative fixed unit price for the disposal of intermediate level waste and spent fuel.
Mid – ● earliest date for a possible operator to request a fixed late 2009 unit price for the disposal of intermediate level waste
and spent fuel.
21
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Clarity on what is included in the fixed unit price for disposal of intermediate level waste and spent fuel
ThefixedunitpricethattheGovernmentwillsetforoperatorsofnewnuclear2.33 powerstationsfordisposingoftheirintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelwillbebasedonanestimateofthecostsofdisposingofthesematerialsinageologicaldisposalfacility.Thiscostingwillincludethefollowingitems:
Estimateofcostsofdisposingofintermediatelevelwasteinageological●●
disposalfacility15;
Estimateofcostsofdisposingofspentfuelinageologicaldisposalfacility●●16;
Significantriskpremiumtocover:●●
theriskthattheeventualcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacility●O
todisposeofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelarehigherthanestimated;and
theriskthatgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesarenotavailablewhenrequired●O
bytheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforthewaste.
Table3givesfurtherdetailontheitemsthatwillbepaidforfromtheFundand2.34 thosewhichareincludedinthefixedunitprice.
15 Thisestimateincludesacontributiontowardsthefixedcostsofconstructingageologicaldisposalfacility.16 Thisestimateincludesacontributiontowardsthefixedcostsofconstructingageologicaldisposalfacility.
22
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Table 3: Summary of principal costs streams and how they will be met 1718
Cost How cost will be met Included in fixed unit price?
Decommissioningthestation IndependentFund No
LowLevelWaste(LLW)
PackaginganddisposalofLLW●●
fromoperations,includingtransport
Packaginganddisposalof●●
LLWfromdecommissioning,includingtransport
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
N/A
No
IntermediateLevelWaste(ILW)
Conditioningandpackagingof●●
operationalILW
Buildingandmaintenanceof●●
interimstoresforILW17
Conditioningandpackagingof●●
decommissioningILW
Transportofoperationaland●●
decommissioningILWfordisposal
Disposalofoperationaland●●
decommissioningILW
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
N/A
No
No
No
Yes
SpentFuel(SF)
Operationoffuelpondsduring●●
thegeneratinglifeofstation
Operationoffuelpondsafter●●
thegeneratinglifeofstation
Buildingandmaintenanceof●●
interimstoresforSF18
TransportofSFfordisposal●●
EncapsulationofSFfordisposal●●
DisposalofallSF●●
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
N/A
No
No
No
No
Yes
17 Iftheinterimstoresarebuiltaspartofthestationconstruction,thecostsoftheirconstructionwillnotbemetfromtheFund.
18 Iftheinterimstoresarebuiltaspartofthestationconstruction,thecostsoftheirconstructionwillnotbemetfromtheFund.
23
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Cost How cost will be met Included in fixed unit price?
Non-radioactivehazardouswaste
●● Managinganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromoperations
●● Managinganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromdecommissioning
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
N/A
No
Planning
●● Decommissioningplanningbeforestartofgeneration
●● Pre-closuredecommissioningplanning
●● Anyplanningcarriedoutduringdecommissioning
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
N/A
No
No
OtherCosts
●● Allothercostsassociatedwithoperatingthesiteuntilendofitsgeneratinglife.Thesecostsinclude,butarenotnecessarilylimitedto,thoseassociatedwithmaintainingtheinfrastructurenecessaryfortheoperatortobeaholderofanuclearsitelicence19
●● Allothercostsassociatedwithoperatingthesiteafterendofitsgeneratinglifeanduntilthesitelicenceissurrendered.Thesecostsinclude,butarenotnecessarilylimitedto,thoseassociatedwithmaintainingtheinfrastructurenecessaryfortheoperatortobeaholderofanuclearsitelicence20
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
N/A
No
1920
19 Thesecostsarelikelytoincludethecostsofsecurityforthesite,sitemonitoring,ongoingmaintenanceatthesite(otherthanmaintenanceoftheinterimstoresforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel)andliaisonwiththeregulators.
20 Thesecostsarelikelytoincludethecostsofsecurityforthesite,sitemonitoring,ongoingmaintenanceatthesite(otherthanmaintenanceoftheinterimstoresforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel)andliaisonwiththeregulators.
24
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Ifconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcompletewhenrequired2.35 bytheagreedschedule(asdescribedinparagraph2.18),theGovernmentmighthavetotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’swastebeforedisposalfacilitiesareavailable.InthesecircumstancestheGovernmentwouldneedtocarryoutotherwastemanagementactivities.Thesemightinclude:
maintainingsafeandsecureinterimstoragefromthepointatwhich●●
theGovernmenttakestitletothewasteuntilitcanbedisposedofinageologicaldisposalfacility;
conditioningandencapsulatingSFinaformsuitablefordisposal(weassume●●
thatitwillnotbepossibletodothisinadvanceofdisposal);
re-licensingpartofthereactorsitetoenabletheGovernmenttotaketitleto●●
theinterimstores;
transportingILWandSFtothegeologicaldisposalfacility;●●
thepossibilitythattheGovernmentmayhavetopaytocleanupany●●
contaminationonthesiteoftheinterimstores,ortore-packagethewasteorre-buildthestores;
decommissioningtheinterimstoresandcleaninguptheresidualsite.●●
Someofthese,suchasthecostsoftransportofwasteandspentfuel,the2.36 encapsulationofspentfuelandthedecommissioningoftheinterimstorewillbecostsforwhichtheoperatorwillhavemadeprovisionintheFund(seeTable3),butnotaspartofthefixedunitprice.Inthecircumstancessetoutabove,theamountsthatoperatorshavebudgetedforthesecosts(setoutintheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanthathasbeenagreedwiththeSecretaryofState)willpasstotheGovernmentwhentitletoandliabilityforthewastetransfers,tocoverthecostsofperformingtheseservices(andoperatorswillbeexpectedtomakeprovisionundertheirapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgrammetoenablethistransfertotakeplace).Otherpotentialcosts,suchaspayingforfurthermaintenanceofwasteorspentfuelininterimstoresorthere-packagingofthewasteorre-buildingofthestores,willbemetbytheGovernment,butwillhavebeenfactoredintotheriskpremiumaddedtothefixedunitpricetocovertheriskthatconstructionofdisposalfacilitiesisnotcompletebythetimerequiredbytheagreedschedule.
TheGovernmentwouldalsoexpecttoreducetheriskofincurringthesecosts2.37 byensuringthatduediligenceiscarriedoutattheoperator’sinterimstorebeforetakingtitletoandliabilityforthewasteandspentfuelinthestore.TheduediligenceexercisewouldprovidetheGovernmentwithreassurancethattheinterimstorehasbeenconstructedandmaintainedaccordingtotherequiredspecificationandthattheoperatorhasmetitsobligationsinrelationtowastepackagingandstorage.ThecostsofthisexercisewouldbemetbytheoperatorfromcontributionsitwillhavemadetotheFundforthispurpose.TheGovernmentwouldnotexpecttoagreetotaketitleorliabilityinaccordancewiththetermsofthescheduleuntilanyremedialworkthatisfoundtobenecessaryhasbeencarriedoutattheoperator’sexpense.
25
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Schedule of Payments for the waste disposal service
Weexpectthatthemoneystocoverthefixedunitpriceforthewaste2.38 disposalservicewillbepaidtotheGovernmentastitletoandliabilityforeachoperator’swasteistransferredtotheGovernment.However,weareconsideringwhethertheremaybeacaseforsomeofthisamounttobepaidtotheGovernmentduringthepowerstation’sgeneratinglife.IftheGovernmentdeterminesthatthiswouldbenecessary,wewouldagreeascheduleofpaymentswitheachoperatoratthesametimeastheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisapproved.ThiswouldensurethatoperatorsareabletodesigntheirFundandinvestmentpoliciessothatearlypaymentscanbemadeduringthegeneratinglifeofthestationwhilstalsoensuringthattheFund,takingintoaccountanticipatedgrowth,wouldreachthetargetamount(adjustedtoreflecttheinterimpaymentsmadeinrelationtowastedisposal).TheoperatorwillberesponsibleformakinggoodanyshortfallorriskofshortfallintheaccumulatedfundsheldbytheFund.
TheGovernmentwillexpecttoretainthepowertotaketitletoandliabilityfor2.39 intermediatelevelwasteand/ortospentfuelbeforetheendofthegeneratinglifeofthestation,ifadisposalroutebecameavailableduringthatperiod.TheGovernmentwouldexpecttodiscusswithoperatorsinindividualcasestodeterminearrangementsthatwouldensurethattheirwasteFundwasadequatetofundpaymentsatthistime.
TheGovernmentwouldexpecttoenterintoanagreementwiththeoperator,2.40 oncethefixedunitpriceforthewastedisposalservice,theschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforthewasteandspentfuelandascheduleofpaymentshavebeenset.ThisagreementwouldcoverissuessuchastheabortorterminationcoststhatwouldbepayablebytheoperatorifitlaterchosenottousetheGovernmentwastedisposalservice.
26
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
27
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section3:Financingdecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalfromnewnuclearpowerstations
Setting a framework through the energy Bill
TheEnergyBillwasintroducedtoParliamentinJanuary20083.1 21.TheGovernmentintendstoensurethattheoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsmeetthefullcostsofdecommissioningandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementanddisposalcosts.ItwilldothisbyimposingnewlegaldutiesonoperatorsinthisregardandcreatingnewpowersfortheSecretaryofStatetoensurethatoperatorsmeetthosedutiesundertheEnergyBill.
AsintroducedtoParliament,theclausesintheEnergyBill:3.2
RequireoperatorsofanynewnuclearpowerstationstosubmitaFunded●●
DecommissioningProgrammeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofStateforBusiness,EnterpriseandRegulatoryReform.TheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemustsetout:
thestepsoperatorswilltaketodecommissiontheinstallation,cleanup●O
thesiteandmanagewaste(includingspentfuel)producedduringitselectricitygeneratinglifeandthroughitssubsequentdecommissioning;
theestimatedcostsoftakingthesesteps;●O
howoperatorsintendtomeetthosecosts;and●O
detailsofthefinancialsecuritytobeputinplacetomeetthecosts●O
identified.
GivetheSecretaryofStateapowertoapprovetheFunded●●
DecommissioningProgramme,approveitsubjecttomodificationsorconditionsortorejectit.
ImposeadutyonoperatorstocomplywiththeFundedDecommissioning●●
Programmebymakingitanoffenceiftheyfailtodoso.
21 EnergyBill,Session2007-08,Bill5307-08
28
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
GivetheSecretaryofStatepowers:●●
torequireinformationfromtheoperator,anypersonsresponsibleforthe●O
Fund,andanyotherpersonswithobligationsundertheprogrammetofindoutwhethertheyarecomplyingwiththeprogramme.
wheretheoperator,thepersonsresponsiblefortheFundoranyother●O
personswithobligationsundertheprogrammearenotcomplyingwiththeprogramme:
toobtaininformationfromotherbodiescorporate“associated”with●N
theoperator(toenabletheSecretaryofStatetoconsiderwhethertoimposeobligationsonsuchpersons);and
todirectpersonsinbreachtotaketheactionnecessarytobring●N
themselvesbackintocompliance.
EnabletheSecretaryofStatetorequireoperatorsandpersonsresponsible●●
fortheFundtocarryoutregularreviewsoftheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
GivetheSecretaryofStatepowerstoapprovemodificationstotheFunded●●
DecommissioningProgrammethatmightbeproposedbythenuclearoperatorfromtimetotimeand,incertaincircumstances,torequiremodifications.
GivetheSecretaryofStatepowerstomakeguidanceandregulationsthat●●
setoutwhatanapprovableFundedDecommissioningProgrammemaycontainandtherebyassistoperatorsinunderstandingtheirobligationsundertheBill.
Seektoensurethatforwastemanagementliabilitieswhichariseduring●●
thestation’selectricitygeneratinglife,thereisflexibilityintermsofwhatwillberegulatedforfinancialpurposes.Thisisbecauseitmaybesufficienttopermitoperatorstopayforsomeofthesecostsfromtheirrevenue(forexample).
TheEnergyBillalsoensuresthatoperatorsmustinformtheSecretaryofState3.3 ofanymaterialamendmentsormodificationstoaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeandseekapprovalforthem.TheEnergyBillgivestheSecretaryofStatepowerstoensurethatpersonsresponsibleformanagingaFund(forexample)mustinformtheSecretaryofStateofanymaterialchangestosuchaFund.Ineachcase,modificationstotheprogrammewhichdonotfallwithinthescopeofanyregulationsmadeunderclause46willrequireapprovalbytheSecretaryofState.
ItalsogivestheSecretaryofStatepowerstoimposeobligationsunder3.4 theFundedDecommissioningProgrammeonbodiescorporate,whichareassociatedwiththeoperator(e.g.theparentcompanyoftheoperator).
TheclausesintheEnergyBilldonotdetractfromtheoperator’sunderlying3.5 dutiesundertheexistinglawtodecommissionandcleanupthesiteonwhichthenuclearpowerstationstands.ThesedutiesflowfromthesitelicenceissuedtooperatorsofallnuclearpowerstationsunderSection1ofthe
29
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
NuclearInstallationsAct1965bytheHealthandSafetyExecutive(HSE).UnderSection4ofthatActtheHSEhasthepowertoattachconditionstosuchlicences,anditisinthiswaythattheoperatorisunderanexistinglegaldutytodecommissionanyplantorprocessonthesitewhichmayaffectsafety.
TheEnergyBillisprincipallyconcernedwithensuringthattheoperatormakes3.6 prudentfinancialprovisiontocoverthedischargeofthesedutiessafelyandresponsibly.DespiteallthatfollowsintheguidanceconcerningthecreationofanindependentFundandthedutiesofthatFund(e.g.toverifycostestimatesandtoinvest,accumulateanddisbursemoniesfortherelevantpurpose)theoperatorremainsunderalegaldutyintheEnergyBilltoensurethatprudentfinancialprovisionremainsinplace.Wheretheprovisionsandprotectionsanticipatedintheguidance(whichtheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoseesetoutinanapprovedprogramme)donot(inindividualcases)generatesufficientmoneysbytherelevantdatetoenabletheoperatortodischargeitsdutiesinthisregard,theoperatorremainsliabletoundertakethosedutiesandtoensurethatithassufficientmoneystoenableittodoso.
Enforcement of the approved Funded Decommissioning Programme
AfteraFundedDecommissioningProgrammehasbeenapproved,ifthere3.7 isabreachoftheprogramme,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttousetheinformationgatheringpowersconferredonhimundertheEnergyBilltofindoutmoreinformationaboutthebreachbeforetakingfurtheraction.OncethisinformationhasbeengathereditisintendedthattherebeaflowofcommunicationsbetweentheoperatorandtheSecretaryofStateinanattempttotrytoremedythebreachinaninformalmanner.
Wheresuchanapproachprovesunworkableorisinappropriateforother3.8 reasons(e.g.becauseoftheurgencyorseriousnessofthecase)theSecretaryofStateisrequiredtoconsultwiththeHSE,theEnvironmentAgency(EA)inEnglandandWalesand,ifnecessary,theDepartmentofEnvironmentforNorthernIreland(DOENI)beforeimposingadirectionrequiringthepersontocomplywiththeprogrammeorremedytheeffectofanyunlawfulconduct.
Thedirectionislikelytorequiretheoperatorofthepowerstationtocomply3.9 withanobligationorremedythebreachandwillsetouttheconditionsastohowitistoberemediedandthetimeframeinwhichtheremedyistotakeplace.Wherethedirectionisnotcompliedwith,theSecretaryofStatemayapplytotheHighCourtforanordercompellingtheoperatortocomplywiththedirection.Wherethisorderisgrantedandnotcompliedwiththenormalpenaltiesforcontemptofcourtwouldapply.TheSecretaryofStatemayalsoinitiateaprosecution(althoughinsufficientlypressingorseriouscaseshemightinitiatesuchproceedingspriortotakingallthestepsreferredto).
30
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Protecting the Taxpayer
TheGovernmenthasconfidenceinthesafety,securityandenvironmental3.10 frameworkfortheUK’snuclearpowersector.
Anumberofindustries–forexampleoilandgasproduction–have3.11 associatedlong-termdecommissioningcostsandpotentialenvironmentalimpacts.However,theGovernmentrecognisesthathealthandsafetyandenvironmentalconsiderationsandthenecessarilyverylong-termnatureofnuclearwastedisposalrequireparticularlyrobustarrangementstoensurethatthetaxpayerdoesnotpaythecostsofnuclearwasteanddecommissioning.ThatiswhytheGovernmentiskeentoputinplaceoneofthemostrobustregulatoryframeworksintheworldtoensurethatnucleargeneratorswillmeetthesecostsinallcrediblecircumstances.
Itisimpossibletoeradicateallrisk.TheGovernmentcannotruleoutthe3.12 possibilitythattherecouldbeextremecircumstanceswheretheGovernmentcouldbecalledupontostepintoprotectthepublicandtheenvironment22.
TheEnergyBillrequirestheSecretaryofStatetoexercisehispowersto3.13 approveFundedDecommissioningProgrammeswithaviewtoensuringthatthearrangementsputinplacebyoperatorsareprudent.TheBillandGuidanceprovidenumerousstringentlayersofprotectiontoensurethatthetaxpayerdoesnotpayforwasteanddecommissioningcostsundernormalcommercialoperation,butalsointheeventofanunlikelyscenario,suchastheearlyclosureofthepowerstationortheinsolvencyofthepowerstationoperator.Theselayersofprotectionareasfollows:
Firstly,itwillbeacriminaloffencetooperateanewnuclearpowerstation3.14 unlessthereisanapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgrammeinplace.Inthissituationthecompanywhichoperatesthestationwillbeliablefortheoffenceaswillofficersofthecompanywheretheactsconcernedarecommittedwiththeconsentorconnivanceofthosepersonsorareattributabletotheirneglect.
Operatorsandpersonsresponsibleforthemoneyssetasidebytheoperator3.15 willbeexpectedtoobtainindependentadviceabouttheaccuracyofcostestimates(forexample)providedbytheoperatorpriortosubmissionoftheProgrammetotheSecretaryofState.ThatProgrammemustbeapprovedbytheSecretaryofStatewhomustdosowithaviewtoensuringthatitmakesprudentprovisionfordecommissioningandcleanupofthestationandthesiteonwhichitstands,includingthefinancialprovisionforthoseactivities.WeareestablishingtheNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard(NLFAB)toensuretheSecretaryofStatehasaccesstoexpertadvicewhenheconsiderswhethertoapproveaProgramme.
22 IntheunlikelyeventofamajorincidentGovernmentwould,ofcourse,stepinifnecessarytoprotectthepublicandtheenvironmentinaccordancewithit’sInternationalObligations,althoughtheseliabilitiesarenotwithinthescopeoftheEnergyBill.However,insofarassuchanincidentgaverisetoaliabilityinrelationtothecostsofdealingwithwastemanagementanddecommissioning,theBillisintendedtoensurethisliabilitydoesnotfallonthetaxpayer.
31
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Secondly,itwillbeanoffencetofailtocomplywithsuchProgrammes(for3.16 whichthecompanyanditsofficersmaybeliable)andtheSecretaryofStatewillhavethepowertoissueadirectiontopersonsinbreachoftheprogrammetobringthemselvesintocomplianceandremedytheeffectsoftheirconductwherenecessary.Whereapersonfailstocomplywithadirection,theSecretaryofStatemayapplytotheHighCourtforanordercompellingthatpersontodoso.Wherethepersonfailstocomplywithacourtorderthatpersonwouldbeincontemptofcourtwhichispunishablewithafineorimprisonment.ProvisionoffalseinformationtotheSecretaryofStatebyanoperator,officersoftheoperator,personsresponsibleformanagingtheFundoranyotherpersonswithobligationsundertheProgrammeisacriminaloffence.
Thirdly,thedraftguidancestipulatesthatthefundingarrangementsunderthe3.17 ProgrammemustincludeproposalsforcontributionsbythepowerstationoperatortoanindependentFundfromdayoneofgeneration.Thecontributionsmustaimatatargetamountwhichisatleast100percentoftheinflation,riskanduncertaintyadjustedvalueoftheoperator’spredictedliabilitiesandtheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttoapproveanappropriatecontingencyinthetargetamountfortheFund.TominimisetheriskofanyshortfallintheFund,therewillbe:
ProvisionforregularmonitoringoftheliabilitiesandtheFundand●●
re-assessmentoftheexpectedcosts,feedingthroughtoincreasesinthecontributionstotheFundifnecessary.Reviewsofthedecommissioningandwasteliabilitieswillbeverifiedbytrusteesrelyingonindependentadvicefromthirdpartieswherenecessary,submittedtotheSecretaryofState(whomaytakeadvicefromNLFAB)andpublished.
ProvisionbytheoperatortomanageandmitigatetheriskthattheFund●●
isinsufficientforwhateverreason(e.g.becausethepowerstationclosesearly,beforeallthecontributionstotheFundhavebeenmade).SecurityagainstsuchriskmaytaketheformofanupfrontendowmenttotheFundtogetherwithaprovisiontofrontloadcontributionsduringtheearlyyearsofthepowerstation’sgeneratinglifecombinedwithadditionalsecurityapprovedbytheSecretaryofState,forexampleinsurance,financialinstrumentsorparentcompanyguarantees.Moredetailissetoutinparagraphs5.10.1–5.10.7.
Fourthly,theEnergyBillwillgivetheGovernmentthepowertoimpose3.18 obligationsoncorporatebodiesassociatedwiththeoperatorforexampleparentcompaniesorsistercompanies,if(forexample)theoperatorfailstocomplywiththeprogrammebutalsowhereitisnecessarytosecurethatprudentprovisionismadefordecommissioningandwastemanagement.
Finally,theGovernmentexpectstheFundtobedomiciledintheUKandthe3.19 EnergyBillwillprovideastatutoryprotectionfortheindependentFundintheeventoftheinsolvencyoftheoperatorinrelationtoclaimsbroughtbyitscreditors.
32
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Intheextremecircumstancethattheseverallayersofprotectionsetoutinthe3.20 EnergyBillwerejudgedunabletomeetactualoranticipatedcosts,thentheGovernmentwouldneedtoconsiderwhetheritwasnecessarytostepintoprotectthepublicandtheenvironment.Inthosecircumstances,thealternativeoptionswouldbe,orwouldhavebeen,extensivelyexplored,includingthepossibilityoffindingasuitablebuyerforthepowerstationwhereappropriate.InterventionbytheGovernmentwouldbealastresortandtheGovernmentwouldinanyeventexpecttocallfirstonthemoneysetasidebytheoperatorintotheFund.
ItisbecausetheEnergyBillandguidancewillputinplacenumerousstringent3.21 layersofprotectionandcontingencyarrangementsthattheGovernmentconsidersitveryunlikelythattheoperationofnewnuclearpowerstationswillgiverisetocircumstancesinwhichthepublicpurseiscalledupon.
regulations under the energy Bill
TheBillalsocontainspowerstomakeregulationsinanumberofareas3.22 includingthepreparation,content,implementationandmodificationofFundedDecommissioningProgrammes.
Thepurposeoftheregulationsintheareasreferredtowouldbetosetout3.23 thematterswhichtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemustaddress(inordertogainapprovalbytheSecretaryofState)aswellasaframeworkthatwouldenableoperatorstounderstandtheirobligationsunderaFundedDecommissioningProgrammemorefully.
TheBillallowstheSecretaryofStatetosetouthowfeeswhichhehasthe3.24 powertochargetheoperatorundertheclausesaretobedeterminedandwhentheywillberequiredtobepaid.ThesecouldincludecertaincostsincurredbytheNLFABinassessingprogrammessubmittedbyoperators.
TheBillalsoallowsregulationstobemadewhichsetoutthecircumstances3.25 inwhichtheSecretaryofStatemaydis-applytheprocedureformodifyinganapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgrammeassetoutintheBill.TheGovernmentisnotconsultinginthisdocumentontheinformationwhichfollowsinrelationtowhattheseregulationsmightcontain,anditisincludedforinformationonlyhowever,youarewelcometocommentonwhatissetoutbelowifyouwishtodoso.
TheGovernment’scurrentintentionistosetamaterialitythresholdwhereby3.26 anoperationalortechnicalchangetoapowerstationwhichmateriallyincreasestheoperator’scostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofwastedisposalliabilitieswouldrequirethesubmissionofaproposaltomodifytheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetotheSecretaryofStateforapproval.
33
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
TheGovernment’scurrentthinkingisthatanincreaseintheoperator’s3.27 decommissioningliabilitiesasaresultofanoperationalortechnicalchangebymorethanacertainpercentage(fivepercentforexample)ofthenetpresentvalue(adjustedforinflation)ofthethencurrentestimateoftheoperator’sdecommissioningliabilitieswouldbeconsideredmaterial.TheGovernmentisalsoconsideringamaterialitythresholdinrelationtoanincreaseintheamountofwastedisposalliabilities.
SuchamodificationoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewould3.28 requiretheapprovaloftheSecretaryofStateinaccordancewiththeprocedurelaiddowninclauses44and45oftheEnergyBill.Paragraphs5.6.12–5.6.13containfurtherinformationinthisregard.Thisinformationhasbeenincludedinthedraftguidancebecause(howeverthelimitiscalculatedorformulated)itisexpectedtoformanimportantpartoftheoperator’sdutiesinrelationtoreviewandreportinghenceitisusefultorefertoittherealso.Inclusionisnotintendedinanywaytounderminethestatementmadeinparagraph3.25.
Asreferredtoinparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16andAnnexA,theoperator3.29 willbeexpectedtoprepareanannualreportsettingoutoperationalandtechnicalchangestothesitewhichhaveaneffectonthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofwastedisposalliabilitiesincludedintheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.TheGovernmentisconsideringonlyrequiringthoseoperationalortechnicalchangeswhichincreasethenetpresentvalue(adjustedforinflation)ofthethencurrentestimatesofthecostsofthedecommissioningliabilitiesbymorethanacertainpercentage(1percentforexample)tobereportedintheannualreport.TheGovernmentisalsoconsideringademinimisreportingthresholdinrelationtoanincreaseintheamountofwastedisposalliabilities.
Regulationsmaysetoutwhatcriteriawouldneedtobemetwhenobtaining3.30 advicefromindependentthirdpartiesinrelationtotheapprovalormodificationofaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeinorderfortheSecretaryofStatetorelyonthatthirdpartyadvice.ThiswouldenabletheSecretaryofStatetorelyonadviceinrelationtocostestimatesorotherfinancialmattersundertheprogrammewhichisprovidedbypartiesindependentoftheoperatorandtheSecretaryofStatebutobtainedbytheoperator.ItwouldalsoenablehimtorelyonadviceobtainedbythepersonsresponsiblefortheFund.RegulationswouldsetoutthecircumstancesinwhichtheSecretaryofStatewouldrelyonthatadvicebutthesemightincludewhentheprogrammeisinitiallyapproved,whentheSecretaryofStateisconsideringaproposedmodificationfromtheoperator,orwhenheisconsideringtheregularreportssubmittedbytheoperatorortheFund.
RegulationsthatformpartoftheChapteroftheBillonthedecommissioning3.31 andclean-upofnuclearsiteswillbemadeusingthenegativeprocedure.
34
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ThisBillalsocontainsanordermakingpowerthatwillenabletheSecretaryof3.32 Statetodesignate,bywayofaffirmativeprocedure,whichtechnicalmattersaredesignatedtechnicalmatters.ThepowerenablestheSecretaryofStatetodesignatecertainstepsbywayofwastemanagementanddisposal,whichareundertakenduringthegeneratinglifetimeofthestationas“designatedtechnicalmatters”.Designationmeansthattheoperatorwillberequiredtoprovidecostestimatesinrelationtotheseactivities,anddetailsofthesecurityputinplacetocoverthem,aswellasdetailsofthetechnicalstepstobetakentomanagethewasteconcerned.OperatorsarerequiredtoprovidetotheSecretaryofStateforapprovaldetailsofallthetechnicalstepstobetakentomanagewaste,decommissionanddisposeofwasteundertakenthroughoutthelifeofthestationbothwhenitisgeneratingelectricityandsubsequently.
Theregulationssetoutabovewillbemadeaspartoftheimplementationof3.33 theEnergyBillin2009.
guidance under the energy Bill
WestatedintheNuclearWhitePaper3.34 23ourintentiontopublishforpublicconsultationtwosetsofdraftguidanceonwhatanapprovableFundedDecommissioningProgrammeshouldcontain.Sections4and5ofthisdocumentcontainthisdraftguidanceforconsultationwhichwillassistoperatorsinunderstandingcertainoftheirobligationsundertheEnergyBill.TheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeconsistsoftwoparts,aDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanandaFundingArrangementsPlan.
Thefirstsetofguidance(theDecommissioningandWasteManagement3.35 PlanguidancesetoutinSection4)willassistbusinessesinsettingoutandcostingthestepsinvolvedindecommissioninganewnuclearpowerstationandmanaginghazardouswasteandspentfuelinawaywhichtheSecretaryofStatemayapprove.ThisguidancealsosetsoutthecostmodellingmethodologytheGovernmentexpectstousetogenerateitsownprudentestimatesofthecostsofdecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalfornewnuclearpowerstations.
ThisconsultationdocumentalsocontainsaRoadmapthatsetsoutan3.36 indicativetimelineunderwhichtheGovernmentexpectstopublishitscostestimatesandtobeinapositiontosetafixedunitpriceforwastedisposal.ThisRoadmap(setoutinparagraphs2.25–2.32andTable2)isincludedforinformationonlyandviewsarenotrequestedonit.
Thesecondsetofguidance(TheFundingArrangementPlanguidancesetout3.37 inSection5)willassistoperatorsinsettingoutacceptableproposalsforhowsufficientfundswillbeaccumulatedtomeetthecostsidentifiedandsetsouttheGuidingPrinciplesagainstwhichtheGovernmentwillassessthefundingproposalssubmittedbynuclearoperatorsforapprovalundertheEnergyBill.
23 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
35
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ThisguidanceisstatutoryandwillbelaidbeforeParliamenttoensure3.38 transparency.AsguidanceitcannotcompelbuttakentogetherisintendedtosetoutthematterswhichtheSecretaryofStatemaytakeintoaccountindeterminingwhethertoapproveorapprovewithmodifications,ormodifyaFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
Future development of the guidance
Bothsetsofguidancewillbeamendedasappropriatetotakeaccountoffuture3.39 changesincircumstances.
Thereareanumberofindividualrequirementssetoutintheguidance3.40 thateachoperatorwillneedtoaddressinitsFundedDecommissioningProgramme.Inassessingaprogramme,theSecretaryofStateandhisadvisors,theNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard,willconsiderwhetheritadequatelymeetstheSecretaryofState’sobjectiveofensuringthattheoperatorhassufficientandsecurearrangementsinplaceastestedagainsttheprinciplesoutlinedintheguidanceitself.TheSecretaryofStaterecognisesthatcircumstanceswillvaryforeachoperatorandthatdifferingapproachesmaybeappropriate.Assuchtheguidanceisnotintendedtobeprescriptive.
Scope of the duty to obtain an approved Funded Decommissioning Programme
Geographical scope
TheclausesintheBillextendtoEngland,WalesandNorthernIreland.This3.41 meansthatpersonsapplyingforanuclearsitelicencetoinstalloroperatenewnuclearpowerstationsonsitesinthosepartsoftheUKwouldberequiredtosubmitaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofState(andwouldbesubjecttotheotherprovisionsinthispartoftheBill).
SofarasScotlandisconcerned,ifthereisachangeinpolicytowardsnew3.42 nuclearpowerstationsthere,theGovernmentwouldseektoextendtheprovisionsintheEnergyBilltoScotlandattheearliestavailableopportunity.
Categories of installation covered by scope
Onlypersonswhoapplyforasitelicencetoinstalland/oroperateanew3.43 nuclearinstallationforthepurposeofgeneratingelectricitywillberequiredtosubmitaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofState(andsubjecttotheotherprovisionsinthispartoftheBillasnormal).
TheGovernmentrecognisesthatinduecourseenergycompaniesmaycome3.44 forwardwithproposalstodevelopothernuclearinstallationsandfacilitiesthatwillbothsustainandsupportthedevelopmentofagrowingnuclearenergysector.Shouldthesectordevelopinthisway,theGovernmentwouldseektoensurethatdevelopersofinstallationsorfacilities,whichareconstructedfora
36
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
purposeconnectedtothegenerationofelectricitybynuclearpowerstations,covertheirfulldecommissioningcostsandfullshareofwastemanagementcosts.TheEnergyBillgivestheSecretaryofStateapowertoextendtheclausesintheEnergyBilltosuchinstallationssoastoensurethisobjectiveismet.
ThepowersintheEnergyBillshouldenabletheSecretaryofStateto3.45 extendtheclausestoanewfuelfabricationplantforexample,sincethepurposeofsuchafacilitywouldseemtobeconnectedtothegenerationofelectricity.Thepowercouldnotbeusedinrelationtothosehospitalswhichuseradioactivematerialsfordiagnosticandcurativepurposes,orresearchfacilitieswhoseactivitiesarenotconnectedtoelectricitygeneration.
Categories of waste included in the scope
TheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlansectionoftheFunded3.46 DecommissioningProgrammemustcoverallcategoriesofhazardouswasteandspentfuel.
TheFundingArrangementsPlansectionoftheFundedDecommissioning3.47 Programmemustcoveralldecommissioningandwastemanagementandwastedisposalcostswhichareincurredaftertheendofgenerationplusanywastecoststhatariseduringgenerationasspecifiedinanordermadeunderclause41(5)oftheEnergyBill.
Ongoingwastemanagementcostsduringthegeneratinglifetimeofthestation3.48 (whicharenotspecifiedinanorderunderclause41(5))mustbemetbytheoperatorfromitsoperationalexpenditure,andnotfromtheFund.
Residual Liabilities
Theownerofapowerstationatthetimeofitsdecommissioningwill3.49 normallyberesponsibleforanyresidualliabilitybeyondthatidentifiedintheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan.TheGovernmentisnotremovingthatresidualliabilityfromtheowner.Asregardsthirdpartyclaimsattributabletotheownerortheoperatorofthepowerstationorsite,thesewillbeamatterforthegenerallawandwillbeunaffectedbytheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
37
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
indicative process for submitting and following a Funded Decommissioning Programme
Chart1setsoutanindicativeprocessforthesubmission,approvalandregular3.50 reviewofaFundedDecommissioningProgramme.ItaimstoexplainhowdecisionpointsfortheapprovalofaFundedDecommissioningProgrammefitwiththelicensingandauthorisationprocessoftheregulators.ThechartalsoexplainshowthelicensingandauthorisationprocesswouldfeedintotheproposednewplanningregimecurrentlybeingconsideredaspartofthePlanningBill24.
24 PlanningBill,Session2007-08,Bill7107-08
38
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Financing arrangements Licensing & Authorisationprocess
Operator initiates discussions with BERR (NLFAB advising) and outlinesplanned project timetable, including
preliminary proposals on FundedDecommissioning Programme
HSE/EA Generic design assessmentcompleted around 2011
Formal approval of FundedDecommissioning Programme by SoS
(following advice from NLFAB and regulators)
Construction
Commission stationCommence electricity generation
Operator starts contributing to the Fund
Assessment by SoS (with advice of NLFAB)of the Fund’s performance in accumulatingsufficient funds to finance the D&WM costs
(Re)approval of modifications to theprogramme by SoS (if necessary)
Quinquennial in-depth review of Funded Decommissioning Programme
(DWMP and FAP) and report to SoS. Fund to confirm/revise contribution schedule
Notification (and submission of modifiedprogramme, if necessary) to SoS in theevent of significant changes between
stipulated reviews
Annual report on size and performanceof the Fund by Fund
Annual review by the operator of the DWMP
HSE: Grant Licence to install/operateEA: Issue environmental permits and
radioactive waste disposal authorisation
HSE (following consultation with EA) issue Consent for Active Commissioning
HSE perform periodic review ofdecommissioning strategy
EA perform periodic reviews of permitsand authorisations
Site specific assessment commences
HSE/EA:Assess regulatory submissions (safety/
security/environmental/radioactive waste)
HSE: Discretionary stakeholderengagement
EA: consultation
HSE/EA: minded to accept regulatorysubmissions from prospective operators
(including advising proposed InfrastructurePlanning Commission (IPC) of this position)
Detailed discussions betweenOperator, BERR (with NLFAB advice)
and Regulators leading to outlineFunded Decommissioning Programme
Submission including supportinganalysis and documentation, of outline Funded Decommissioning Programme
to SoS
Development of detailed FundedDecommissioning Programme
Detailed discussions with BERR(NFLAB advising) and Regulators and
those responsible for the Fund
Fixed unit price and schedule for transfer of title to waste set.
Schedule of payments to Government (if needed) provided to operators
Those responsible for Fund approve arrangements prior to formal submission
to SoS of detailed Funded Decommissioning Programme
Indicative fixed unit price and scheduleprovided to operators for long term waste
disposal in geological repository. Indicative schedule of payments to Government
provided to operators (if needed)
Chart 1: Indicative process for submitting and following a Funded Decommissioning Programme
39
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Formal approval of FundedDecommissioning Programme by SoS
(following advice from NLFAB and regulators)
Construction
Commission stationCommence electricity generation
Operator starts contributing to the Fund
Assessment by SoS (with advice of NLFAB)of the Fund’s performance in accumulatingsufficient funds to finance the D&WM costs
(Re)approval of modifications to theprogramme by SoS (if necessary)
Quinquennial in-depth review of Funded Decommissioning Programme
(DWMP and FAP) and report to SoS. Fund to confirm/revise contribution schedule
Notification (and submission of modifiedprogramme, if necessary) to SoS in theevent of significant changes between
stipulated reviews
Annual report on size and performanceof the Fund by Fund
Annual review by the operator of the DWMP
HSE: Grant Licence to install/operateEA: Issue environmental permits and
radioactive waste disposal authorisation
HSE (following consultation with EA) issue Consent for Active Commissioning
HSE perform periodic review ofdecommissioning strategy
EA perform periodic reviews of permitsand authorisations
Financing arrangements Licensing & Authorisationprocess
Operator initiates discussions with BERR (NLFAB advising) and outlinesplanned project timetable, including
preliminary proposals on FundedDecommissioning Programme
HSE/EA Generic design assessmentcompleted around 2011
Site specific assessment commences
HSE/EA:Assess regulatory submissions (safety/
security/environmental/radioactive waste)
HSE: Discretionary stakeholderengagement
EA: consultation
HSE/EA: minded to accept regulatorysubmissions from prospective operators
(including advising proposed InfrastructurePlanning Commission (IPC) of this position)
Detailed discussions betweenOperator, BERR (with NLFAB advice)
and Regulators leading to outlineFunded Decommissioning Programme
Submission including supportinganalysis and documentation, of outline Funded Decommissioning Programme
to SoS
Development of detailed FundedDecommissioning Programme
Detailed discussions with BERR(NFLAB advising) and Regulators and
those responsible for the Fund
Fixed unit price and schedule for transfer of title to waste set.
Schedule of payments to Government (if needed) provided to operators
Those responsible for Fund approve arrangements prior to formal submission
to SoS of detailed Funded Decommissioning Programme
Indicative fixed unit price and scheduleprovided to operators for long term waste
disposal in geological repository. Indicative schedule of payments to Government
provided to operators (if needed)
40
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
41
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section4:DecommissioningandWasteMangementPlanguidance
Contents
4.1 IntroductionandBackgroundtotheBaseCase
4.2 GenericDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP)–TheBaseCase
4.3 TheBaseCase–WorkingAssumptionsList
4.4 ClassificationofCostsarisingundertheBaseCase
4.5 MethodologyforCostCalculations
42
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.1IntroductionandBackgroundtotheBaseCase
4.1.1 ThisSectioncontainsguidanceforoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationstoassistthemindrawingupaDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP).TheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanisthatpartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhichaddressesthosemattersreferredtoinclause41(7)(a)and(b)oftheEnergyBill25(namelydetailsofthestepstobetakeninrelationtothetechnicalmattersandestimatesofthecostslikelytobeincurredintakingthosesteps).TogetherwithseparateFundingArrangementPlan(FAP)guidance,thisguidanceprovidesinformationonwhataFundedDecommissioningProgrammeshouldcontain.Thisguidanceissetoutindraftforconsultation.
4.1.2 ToensurethattheGovernmentcanhaveconfidencethatoperatorsofanynewnuclearpowerstationsmakeadequatefinancialprovisionwhichmeetsthefullcostsofdecommissioningandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementcosts,itwillbeimportanttounderstandthelikelycostsoftheseactivities.AstheNuclearWhitePaper26announced,theSecretaryofStatehasembarkedonaprogrammetodeterminerobustestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.
4.1.3 UndertheEnergyBill2008,aspartofgainingapprovaltobuildanewnuclearpowerstation,operatorswillberequiredtosubmittotheSecretaryofStateaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforapproval.Clause41(7)oftheEnergyBillsetsoutthematterswhichtheProgrammeisrequiredtoaddress.Clause41(7)(a)requiresapotentialoperatorofanewstationtosetoutdetailsofthestepstobetakenundertheprogrammeinrelationtowhataredescribedasthe“technicalmatters”.Thetechnicalmattersaredetailsofthemattersreferredtoinclause41(5)oftheEnergyBill(i.e.thedecommissioningoftheinstallation,cleaningupofthesite,andwastemanagementanddisposalactivitiesundertakenduringthegeneratinglifeofthestation).
4.1.4 Clause41(7)(b)requirestheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetocontainestimatesofthecostslikelytobeincurredinconnectionwithwhataredescribedasthedesignatedtechnicalmatters.ThedesignatedtechnicalmattersarethestepssetoutintheProgrammeandrequiredtobetakeninrelationto:
25 EnergyBill,Session2007-08,Bill5307-0826 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
43
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
decommissioningtheinstallation;●●
cleaningupthesite;and●●
suchaspectsofwastemanagementanddisposalactivitiesundertaken●●
duringthegeneratinglifetimeofthestationastheSecretaryofStatemayspecifybyorder27.
4.1.5 OperatorsshouldmeetthecostsofdesignatedtechnicalmattersfromtheindependentFundtheywillbeexpectedtosetupandthesematterswillbesubjecttoregulationundertheFundingArrangementPlan(FAP)theysubmitforapprovalundertheEnergyBill.(TheseissuesareexploredingreaterdetailintheFundingArrangementsPlanguidancealsoissuedforconsultationbytheSecretaryofStateundertheEnergyBill).TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthecostsoftechnicalmatters,whicharenotdesignated,tobemetbytheoperatorfromoperationalexpenditure.ThesecostswillnotbesubjecttoregulationundertheFAP,althoughtheactivitiestowhichtheyrelatewillstillbesubjecttoregulationundertheDWMP.Thecostsoftechnicalmatters,whicharenotdesignated,arecomparativelylow,andpaymentswillneedtobemadeatthetimetheseexpensesareincurred;thatisduringthegeneratinglifetimeofthestationwhentheoperatorshouldhavereadyaccesstosufficientmoniestomeetsuchcostswithoutreferencetotheFund.ItisalsoanticipatedthatsuchcostsmaybeincurredatregularintervalssoitisappropriatethatthesecostsshouldbemetfromoperationalexpendituretoavoidunnecessarycostandburdensarisingaroundpaymentofmoneysintotheFundonlytowithdrawthesamemoneysarelativelyshortperiodoftimelater(e.g.withinthesamefinancialyear).FurtherinformationontheSecretaryofState’sproposalsforthetechnicalmattersthatshouldbedesignatedtechnicalmattersissetoutinparagraphs4.4.1–4.4.4andTable6.
4.1.6 InthisguidancethatpartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhichconcernsthetechnicalmattersandthatpartoftheprogrammewhichsetsouttheestimatesofthecostslikelytobeincurredinconnectionwiththedesignatedtechnicalmattersaretogetherreferredtoastheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(theDWMP).
4.1.7 TheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttheDWMPforthenewnuclearpowerstationtocoverthetechnicalwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningstepstobetakenoverthefulllifecycleofthestation,andincludeanestimateofthecostsassociatedwiththeoperator’sliabilitieswithregardtothesesteps.Thisisinadditiontoexistingregulatoryscrutinytoensuresafety,securityandenvironmentalprotectioninrelationtotheseaspectsofanuclearpowerstation,andisintendedtocontributetotheoverallobjectiveoftheFundedDecommissioningProgramme,ofensuringthatoperatorswillaccruesufficientfundstomeetthecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioningastheyfalldue.
27 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttomakesuchanorderinaccordancewiththetimingsetoutinparagraphs3.22–3.33
44
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.1.8 TheaimoftheDWMPshouldbetoensurethesafe,environmentallyresponsibleandprudentdecommissioningofthenuclearpowerstationandmanagementanddisposalofwaste.ByformingpartoftheprogrammerequiredtobeapprovedbytheSecretaryofState,itwillensurethatplanningfortheseactivitiesiscarriedoutpriortotheconstructionofthepowerstationandisbasedonestablishedtechniquesandsteps.TheDWMPshouldcontainaccurateanduptodateestimatesofthecostsoftakingsuchstepstoenablesufficientmoneystobeaccumulatedonbehalfoftheoperatortopayforsuchstepstobetaken.OurproposalsforreviewingandreportingagainsttheDWMParesetoutinparagraphs4.2.6–4.2.8andingreaterdetailinparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16andinAnnexA.
Base Case
4.1.9 ToenabletheGovernmenttoestimatethepotentialcostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioningandtoensurethatoperatorsmakeadequateprovisionfortheirfunding,wearesettingoutameansbywhichwastemaybemanagedanddisposedofanddecommissioningcarriedoutthatwillbecostedbyoronbehalfoftheSecretaryofState.Wecallthisthe“BaseCase”.Itbuildsonexistingpolicyandregulationsforwastemanagementanddecommissioning.Italsomakesadditionalassumptionstoensurethatitrepresentsarealisticandprudentwaytoestimatethecostsofandcarryouttheseactivities.AsummaryofsomeoftheassumptionsunderlyingtheBaseCaseissetoutbelow.ReferenceshouldbemadetoTable5forthefulltextoftheassumptions:
Management and disposal of low level waste (LLW)
LLWfromoperationsanddecommissioningwillbedisposedofpromptly●●
afterithasbeengeneratedinasuitabledisposalfacility.
ForthepurposesoftheBaseCase,weassumethatdisposalwillbeatthe●●
facilitycurrentlyoperatinginWestCumbriaorasuccessorfacility.
Management and disposal of intermediate level waste (ILW)
ILWfromoperationsanddecommissioningwillbestoredinsafeandsecure●●
interimstoresassumedtobeonthesiteofthenuclearpowerstationuntildecommissioninghasbeencompletedandageologicaldisposalfacilityisavailabletotakethewaste.
45
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ILWfromoperationsanddecommissioningwillbedisposedofina●●
geologicaldisposalfacility.TheGovernment’sviewisthatitwouldbedesirabletodisposeofILWfromnewnuclearpowerstationsinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilitiesaslegacywasteandwewillexplorethisthroughtheMRWSprogramme.Thesizeofaprogrammeofnewnuclearpowerstationsandthespecificationofthesitechosenforthegeologicaldisposalfacilitymayimpactonwhetherallofthenewwastecouldbestoredinthesamedisposalfacilityaslegacywaste.WewillkeepthisunderreviewasworkontheMRWSprogrammecontinuesandwillensurethatourcostmodellingmethodologyisabletoaccommodatealternativescenarios.
TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofILWanda●●
schedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforthiswaste.Thiswillbesetinaccordancewiththeprocessdescribedinparagraphs2.9–2.24.
Management and disposal of spent fuel
Spentfuelwillbestoredincoolingpondsforaperiodoftime,followedby●●
storageinsafeandsecureinterimstoresonthesiteofthepowerstationuntildecommissioninghasbeencompletedanddisposalfacilitiesareavailabletoaccommodateit.
TheBaseCaseassumesthatspentfuelwillbedisposedofinageological●●
disposalfacility.TheGovernment’sviewisthatitwouldbedesirabletodisposeofspentfuelfromnewnuclearpowerstationsinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilitiesaslegacywasteandwewillexplorethisthroughtheMRWSprogramme.Thesizeofaprogrammeofnewnuclearpowerstationsandthespecificationofthesitechosenforthegeologicaldisposalfacilitymayimpactonwhetherallofthespentfuelfromnewnuclearpowerstationscouldbestoredinthesamedisposalfacilityaslegacywaste.WewillkeepthisunderreviewastheworkontheMRWSprogrammecontinuesandwillensurethatourcostmodellingmethodologyisabletoaccommodatealternativescenarios.
TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofspentfueland●●
aschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforthiswaste.Thiswillbesetinaccordancewiththeprocessdescribedinparagraphs2.9–2.24.
Type of fuel
TheBaseCaseassumesthatnewnuclearpowerstationswilluseuranium●●
oruraniumoxidefuel
TheNuclearWhitePapersetoutthatnewnuclearpowerstationsshould●●
proceedonthebasisthatspentfuelwillnotbereprocessed.Thusthebasecaseassumesthattherewillbenore-processingoftheuraniumfuel,andspentfuelwillbedisposedofafterithasbeenused.
46
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Interim storage
Operatorswillbeobligedtoprovidesafeandsecureinterimstoragefacilities●●
thataretechnicallycapableofbeingmaintainedorreplacedtolastforatleast100yearsfromthetimewhenwasteorspentfuelisfirstemplacedinthem28.
Operatorswillbeobligedtoprovidethestoresastheyareneeded,subject●●
toagreementwithregulatorsandtheSecretaryofState.
Effect of reactor design on the Base Case
TheBaseCasefordifferentreactordesignswillbethesamewhereveritis●●
appropriate.
Itwillbebasedonasinglestationoperatingforanassumedlifeof40years.●●
Definition of decommissioning
Decommissioningbeginswhenthereactorisshutdownwithnointentionof●●
furtheruseforthepurposeofgeneratingelectricity.
Decommissioningendswhenallstationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeen●●
removedandthesitehasbeenreturnedtoanendstatewhichhasbeenagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthority.
Site end state
TheBaseCaseassumesthatthefinalsiteendstatewillbesuchthatall●●
stationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeenremoved,thesitereturnedtoastateagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthorityandreleasedfromthecontrolofthenuclearsitelicence.
Thisislikelytobeastatesimilarto“Greenfield”,dependingonthestateof●●
thesitepriortoconstructionofthestation.
4.1.10TheNuclearWhitePapersetouttheGovernment’sconclusiononwasteanddecommissioning:
“Having reviewed the arguments and evidence put forward, the Government believes that it is technically possible to dispose of new higher-activity radioactive waste in a geological disposal facility and that this would be a viable solution and the right approach for managing waste from any new nuclear power stations. The Government considers that it would be technically possible and desirable to dispose of both new and legacy waste in the same
28 ItshouldbenotedthatoperatorswillbeobligedtomaintaintheirinterimstoresuntilthedateordatesspecifiedinthescheduleagreedwiththeGovernmentforwhentheGovernmentwilltaketitletoandliabilityforeachoperator’sintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel.Inanyevent,theGovernmentconsidersthatwastecanandshouldbestoredinsafeandsecureinterimstoragefacilitiesuntilageologicaldisposalfacilitybecomesavailable.
47
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
geological disposal facilities and that this should be explored through the Managing Radioactive Waste Safely programme. The Government considers that waste can and should be stored in safe and secure interim storage facilities until a geological facility becomes available.
Our policy is that before development consents for new nuclear power stations are granted, the Government will need to be satisfied that effective arrangements exist or will exist to manage and dispose of the waste they will produce.
The Government also believes that the balance of ethical considerations does not rule out the option of new nuclear power stations.29”
4.1.11 ThisconclusionhasinformedtheprovisionsintheBaseCasewhichoperatorsofanynewnuclearpowerstationswillbeexpectedtohaveregardtowhendevelopingtheprogrammetheywillsubmittotheGovernment.Therewillbeflexibilitytoallowoperatorstoproposeothereffectivewaysofdealingwithdecommissioningandwastemanagementiftheychoosetodoso.WeintendtheBaseCasetotakeeffectasguidanceissuedunderclause50(5)oftheEnergyBill.Operators’FundedDecommissioningProgrammeswillbeconsideredonacasebycasebasis.Whenconsideringwhethertoapproveanoperator’sprogramme,theSecretaryofStatewillhaveregardtowhetheritachievestheoveralloutcomeofensuringaprudentmeansforcarryingoutandestimatingthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.
4.1.12Aswellasmeetingcurrentregulatoryrequirements,eachoperator’sprogrammemustensurethatitsetsoutplansforthemanagementanddisposalofallhazardouswastestreamsandthatitincludesalltheelementsforwhichoperatorswillneedtomakefinancialprovision.OnceaprogrammeisapprovedbytheSecretaryofState,theoperatorwillberequiredtofollowit.Theoperatorwill,however,beallowedtoamendtheprogramme,subjecttoapprovalfromtheSecretaryofState.
4.1.13Operatorswillberequiredtoupdatetheprogrammetoreflectmodificationssuchasoperationalortechnicalchangestoanuclearpowerstationthatwouldhaveanimpactontheestimatesofdecommissioningcosts.Paragraph5.6.12setoutfurtherdetailonmodifyingaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeincludinginrelationtotechnicalaspects.
4.1.14Wehaveworkedwiththeregulators,theNDAandkeystakeholderstodeveloptheBaseCase.
Cost estimates
4.1.15TheBaseCaseisakeyinputtoourworktodeveloprobustestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioningfornewnuclearpowerstations.Toprovidefurtherinputs,wehavecarriedoutanexercisetodevelop
29 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
48
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ourunderstandingofthewasteinventoriesthatwouldbeproducedbydifferentgenericreactortypes,todeterminethevolumeandtypesofwastethatnewnuclearpowerstationscouldproduce.Toderiveestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioningfornewnuclearpowerstationswearedevelopingacostmodelthatwillenableustoproducearangeoflikelycosts,aswellasgivingusinformationonthelevelofcertaintyofthosecosts.Ourcostmodellingmethodologyissetoutinmoredetailinparagraphs4.5.1–4.5.39.
49
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.2GenericDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP)–TheBaseCase
4.2.1 ThissectionsetsoutagenericlifecycleDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP)fornewnuclearpowerstations.ThisisalsoreferredtoastheBaseCase.Itshowstheprincipalphasesofthenuclearpowerstationlifecycle,andindicatestheirlikelytimescales.Theplanpresentedhereisgeneric,andservestwoprincipalfunctions:
ItsetsdownthekeypointswhichtheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecta●●
DWMPtoaddress;
ItactsasavehicletoenabletheSecretaryofStatetocalculatetherangeof●●
costsassociatedwithdecommissioningandhazardouswastemanagementanddisposal.ThiswillallowtheSecretaryofStatetoscrutiniseFundedDecommissioningProgrammessubmittedbyoperatorseffectivelywhenconsideringwhethertoapprovethem,toapprovethemsubjecttoconditionsormodifications,ortomodifythem30.
4.2.2 Itisbeingpublishedasguidancetofutureoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationsonthewastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningstepsthattheGovernmentconsidersshouldbeincludedinandcostedaspartoftheDWMPthattheywillneedtosubmittotheSecretaryofStateforapproval.ThisincludesboththosestepswhichtheoperatorwillberesponsibleforcostingandthosestepsthatwillbeincludedinthefixedunitpricethattheGovernmentwillsetfordisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel.ItisrecognisedthatDWMPsforindividualpowerstationswilldifferindetail,astheywillbebasedonaspecificreactordesignataspecificsiterunbyaparticularoperator.If,however,aDWMPbroadlyconformstothebasecasepresentedhere,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoapproveit(orapproveitwithrelativelyminormodifications).Assetoutabove,clause42(4)oftheEnergyBillrequirestheSecretaryofStatetoexercisehispowersinrelationtotheapproval,approvalsubjecttomodificationsorrejectionofaFundedDecommissioningProgrammewiththeaimofensuringthatitmakesprudentprovisionforthetechnicalmattersincludingthedesignatedtechnicalmatters.Thusanoperator’sDWMPwillbeassessedagainstwhetheritachievesthe
30 TheformulationofthecostestimatesdoesnotdetractfromthedutywhichtheSecretaryofStateexpectspersonsresponsiblefortheFundshouldbeundertoverifycostestimates(asappropriate)putforwardbytheoperatorbothatthetimeoffirstapprovaloftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeandpursuanttoperiodicreviewsassetoutintheFundingArrangementPlanguidance.
50
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
overalloutcomeofensuringaprudentmeansforcarryingoutandestimatingthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.
4.2.3 OperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationswillbeexpectedtohaveregardtotheBaseCaseassetoutbelowwhendevelopingtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetheywillsubmittotheSecretaryofState.However,therewillbeflexibilitytoallowoperatorstoproposealternativewaysofcarryingoutwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningiftheychoosetodoso.IfanoperatorputsforwardaDWMPbasedonanalternativetotheBaseCase,theonuswillbeontheoperatortojustifyitsproposalandtheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoconsiderDWMPsbasedonalternativestotheBaseCaseonacasebycasebasis.
Level of Detail required in DWMP
4.2.4 TheDWMPthatanoperatorsubmitstotheSecretaryofStateforapprovalmustcovereachstageofthepowerstation’slife,fromthepermittingstagethroughtodecommissioningandfinalsiteclearance.Itmustdescribeeachstageinsufficientdetailtodemonstratethattheoperatorhasarealistic,clearlydefinedandachievableplanfordealingwithallofthewastestreamsthatwillbeproducedbyitspowerstationandforremediatingthesiteafteruse.TheDWMPmustbesufficientlydetailedtoensurethateachelementofthedecommissioningandwastemanagementworkcanbecostedaccurately.TheSecretaryofStaterecognisesthattechniquesfordecommissioning,wastemanagementanddisposalmaychangeovertimeandthattheoperatormaywishtoprovidefurtherinformationonhoweachpartofitsplanwillbecarriedoutduringthegeneratinglifeofthestationortomodifyitsprogramme(subjecttoapprovalbytheSecretaryofState)fromtimetotime.
4.2.5 TheEnergyBillrequiresthatoperatorsseektheSecretaryofState’sapprovaltomodifytheirDWMP;forexample,ifnewadvancesintechnologyorestablishedpracticesmeanthattheywishtochangethewaytheywillcarryoutwastemanagement,disposalordecommissioning.OperatorswillalsobeexpectedtoseektheapprovaloftheSecretaryofStatetomodifytheirplantoreflectchangesintheregulators’requirements,whichaffectthewaytheywillcarryouttheseactivities.Equally,operatorsshouldseekhisapprovaltomodifytheirDWMPatanytimeduringoperationorastheirstationnearsdecommissioningiftheywishtoincludefurtherdetailontheirplanforthedecommissioningprocess.Inanycase,operatorswillneedtheapprovaloftheSecretaryofStatetomodifytheirDWMPandanychangessuggestedwillneedtobefullyjustified.
Review and Reporting
4.2.6 OperatorswillberequiredtoreviewtheirDWMPperiodicallytoensurethatitremainsuptodateandthatanychangestothecostestimatesasaresultofoperationalandtechnicalchanges,oranyotherchangesthatmayhaveoccurred,havebeenassessed.Operatorswillberequiredtoreportonsuch
51
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
changeswhichwillimpactonthecostestimatesintheirannualreportandwillberequiredtoconductare-assessmentoftheDWMPandcostestimatessetoutintheDWMPaspartoftheirquinquennialreportor,annuallywherethecumulativeeffectofundertakingsuchoperationalortechnicalchangesinanannualperiodwouldhaveamaterialeffectontheoperator’sliabilites.Inaddition,operatorswillberequiredtoreportonanadhocbasisanychangesthatwillaffectthecostestimatesoverandaboveamaterialitythreshold.OperatorswillberequiredtonotifytheSecretaryofStateofthatchangeandproposeforapprovalamodificationtotheDWMPtotakeaccountofsuchchange.
4.2.7 OperatorsmustalsodemonstratetotheSecretaryofStatethat,aspartoftheirbasicrecordkeepingstructure,theywillmaintainanaccuraterecordofthedesignof,atleast,thenuclearisland(s),andthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundmustbesatisfiedwiththesearrangements.
4.2.8 Furtherdetailonproceduresforreviewingandreportingonanoperator’sFundedDecommissioningProgrammeissetoutinparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16andinAnnexA.
Change of control/ownership of the operator
4.2.9 Wheretheidentityoftheoperatorchangesduringthelifetimeofthestation(whetherduringconstruction,electricitygenerationorsubsequently)theEnergyBillrequirestheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetobere-submittedforapproval,whichwouldincludetheDWMP.
4.2.10Paragraphs5.12.1–5.12.9containmoredetailaboutwhattheoperatorwouldbeexpectedtodoinrelationtothataspectoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewherethereisachangeofcontrolaffectingit.Thatsaid,whereachangeintheentityorentitieswhichcontroltheoperatoroccurs,theSecretaryofStatewouldnotexpecttorequirere-submissionoftheDWMP,savewherethechangeofcontrolledtochangestothestepswhichtheoperatorproposedtoundertaketodecommissionthestationandtomanageanddisposeofwasteandwhicharesetoutintheDWMP.
Relationship between the Base Case and regulatory requirements
4.2.11TheBaseCaseisbuiltonexistingpolicyandregulatoryrequirements;althoughitalsomakesadditionalassumptionstoensureitrepresentsacomprehensiveandprudentmeansofestimatingthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.
4.2.12TheemphasisonensuringthatsufficientfinancialprovisionismadetocovertheliabilitiesandthusencouragingpublicconfidencemeansthattheBase
52
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Casemaydifferinsomecasesfromtheassumptionsandrequirementsofthesafety,securityandenvironmentalregulators.ThisisduetothedifferentobjectivesthattheSecretaryofStateandtheregulatorsareaimingtomeet.However,anydifferencesareintendedonlytoaddfurtherprotectionstoensurethatoperatorsmakeadequatefinancialprovisiontomeettheirliabilities.Theywillbuildonandshouldnotcontradictorweakentherequirementsoftheregulators,andoperatorswillalwaysbeobligedtosatisfytheregulatorsthattheirplansareacceptablebeforetheycanbeapprovedbytheSecretaryofState.
4.2.13Assetoutabove,wehaveworkedwiththeregulators,theNDAandkeystakeholderstodeveloptheBaseCase.
Waste Minimisation
4.2.14AspartoftheirDWMP,operatorswillbeexpectedtosetdownthestepstheywilltakethroughoutallofthestagesofthestation’slifetoensurethatwastevolumesandthecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioningareminimisedthroughoutreactorlife;forexample,bycarefulsegregationofwastearisingsandbyminimisationofsecondarywastes31.Operatorswillbeexpectedtohaveregardtothewastehierarchyindeterminingthispartoftheirplan.
Structure of the DWMP
4.2.15Asstatedabove,theBaseCaseisbuiltonexistingpolicyandregulations,aswellasmakingadditionalassumptionstoensureitrepresentsacomprehensiveandadequatemeansofestimatingthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectoperatorstousetheseassumptionswhendevisingtheirDWMPsorifnottoexplainwhatassumptionstheyhavemadewhichtheSecretaryofStatemayapproveasheseesfit,byreferencetotheprudencethresholdlaiddownintheEnergyBill.
The Phases of the Base Case to be set out in the DWMP
4.2.16TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheDWMPtobedividedintofourprincipalphases,whichareshownasatimelineinChart2.
Phase1–Preparationandpermitting–thoseactivitiesrequiredtoobtain●●
regulatoryapprovaltobeginconstructionofthepowerstation;
Phase2–Constructionandcommissioning;●●
31 Secondarywastesarethosewasteswhicharegeneratedunavoidablyaspartofthewastemanagementprocessitself.
53
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Phase3–Operationofthestation,includinganyrefurbishmentrequired●●
duringthegeneratinglifeandmanagementofoperationalwastes;
Phase4–Decommissioning–dismantlingthestation,disposingof●●
remainingwasteandremediatingthesitetoaconditionagreedwiththeregulators.
4.2.17Totheextentpracticable,operatorswillbeexpectedtofollowthisoutlineofphasesinpreparingtheirDWMPs.
Phase 1 – Preparation and Permitting
4.2.18ThisphaseoftheBaseCasecoversthoseactivitieswhichmustbeundertakenbeforeconstructionofanuclearpowerstationcanbegin.Duringthisphase,potentialoperatorswill:
Generateasuiteofdetailed,station-specific,designdocuments;●●
Obtainregulatoryapprovalforthehealth,safetyandenvironmentalaspects●●
oftheproposednewbuild,andhencepermissiontobeginconstruction;
Makeasuccessfulplanningapplication;●●
PrepareaDWMPforsubmissiontotheSecretaryofStateandobtain●●
approvalforthatplan,aspartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
4.2.19AspartoftheirDWMP,operatorswillberequiredtosubmitestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioning.Operatorswillalsoberequiredtoincludeintheirestimatesthecostsofwastedisposal.ToenabletheGovernmenttodeterminethecostsofdisposalforintermediatelevelwaste(ILW)andspentfuel,operatorswillneedtocalculatetheirexpectedILWandspentfuelinventoryfortheassumedgeneratinglifeofthestationandprovidethisinformationtotheSecretaryofState.TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpricetooperatorsfordisposalofthesematerials,aswellasascheduleforwhentheGovernmentwilltaketitletoandliabilityforthewasteandspentfuel(assetoutinparagraphs2.9–2.24).TheinformationonwasteinventoryandtheagreedfixedunitpricewillenableoperatorstopredictthewastedisposalcoststhattheywillneedtomeetfromtheFund.
4.2.20TheGovernmentisconsideringwhetherthereisacaseforsomeelementsofthisfixedunitpriceforthedisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfueltobepaidtotheGovernmentduringthepowerstation’sgeneratinglife;forexample,tocoverthecostsofbuildingadditionalcapacityinageologicaldisposalfacilityastheyareincurred.IftheGovernmentconsidersthatthiswouldbenecessary,wewouldagreeascheduleofpaymentswitheachoperatoratsametimeastheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisapproved.
54
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.2.21TheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttoretainthepowertotaketitletoandliabilityforintermediatelevelwasteand/ortospentfuelbeforetheendofthegeneratinglifeofthestation,ifadisposalroutebecameavailableduringthatperiodandifitwassensibletodoso.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttodiscusswithoperatorsinindividualcasestodeterminearrangementsthatwouldensurethattheirFundwasadequatetofundpaymentsatthistime.
4.2.22FurtherinformationonsettingafixedunitpricefordisposalofILWandspentfuelcanbefoundinparagraphs2.9–2.13.
Phase 2 – Construction
4.2.23InthisphaseoftheBaseCasethepowerstationisconstructedandcommissioned.Duringthisperiodoperatorswillobtainalltheregulatoryapprovalsrequiredtobeginoperation.
Phase 3 – Operation
4.2.24Thebasecaseassumesa40yeargeneratinglifeforthereactor.Thisisconsideredtobeasensibleassumption,whichisinlinewithassumptionsmadeintheGovernment’scostmodellingworkpublishedalongsidetheEnergyReview32.
4.2.25IntheDWMPtheysubmittotheGovernment,operatorsshouldidentifyanyplannedoutagesforreactorrefurbishment.Anywastesarisingduringroutinemaintenanceorduringrefurbishmentareassumedtobemanagedinthesamewayaswastesfromroutineoperation.Further,anywastearisingfromemergencyrepairsorrefurbishmentsaretobemanagedinthesamewayaswastesfromroutineoperation.
4.2.26Theoperatorisresponsibleforensuringthatalltherequiredfacilitiesforthestorageandanynecessaryprocessingofoperationalwastesareavailableasandwhenneeded.
Operational Low Level Waste Management
4.2.27TheBaseCaseassumesthatlow-levelwastesarisingduringoperationwillbepackagedonsitebytheoperatoranddispatchedtoadisposalfacilitypromptlyaftertheyhavebeengenerated.Operatorswillberequiredtoensurethatanyfacilitiesneededforpackagingareavailableonsite,althoughitisassumedthatlow-levelwastewillnotbeconditionedonsiteandthatconditioningfacilitieswillthereforenotbeneeded.ThearrangementsforpackagingmustbeconsistentwiththosecurrentlyacceptabletotheUKregulators.Theoperatorisresponsiblefortransportofthewastetothedisposalfacility,althoughthetransfermaybeundertakenbyathirdparty,acceptabletotheUKregulators,
32 EnergyReview,The Energy Challenge,July2006
55
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
undercontracttotheoperator.TheBaseCaseassumesthattitletothewastewillpasstothedisposalfacilityoperatorwhenanindividualpackagehasbeentransportedtothefacility,andacceptedbythefacilityoperatorasmeetingtherelevantacceptancecriteria.ItisassumedthatlowlevelwastewillbedisposedofintheUK,andthatdisposalfacilitieswillbeavailablewhenrequired,atapricetobeagreedbetweentheplantoperatorandtheoperatorofthedisposalservice.Operatorswillberequiredtomeetthecostsofmanaginganddisposingofoperationallowlevelwaste.Thesecostswillbemetfromoperationalrevenues.
Operational Intermediate Level Waste Management
4.2.28TheBaseCaseassumesthatintermediatelevelwastearisingduringoperationswillbestoredinsafeandsecureinterimstoragefacilitiesonthesiteofthepowerstationpendingdisposalinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilitiestobeusedforthedisposaloflegacyintermediatelevelwastefromourexistingnuclearfacilities.ThearrangementsforconditioningandstoragemustbeconsistentwiththosecurrentlyacceptabletotheUKregulators.
Spent Fuel Management
4.2.29TheBaseCaseassumesthatnewnuclearpowerstationswilluseuraniumoruraniumoxidefuel.TheNuclearWhitePapersetoutthefollowingconclusiononreprocessing:
“Having reviewed the arguments and evidence put forward, and in the absence of any proposals from industry, the Government has concluded that any new nuclear power stations that might be built in the UK should proceed on the basis that spent fuel will not be reprocessed and that plans for, and financing of, waste management should proceed on this basis.33”
4.2.30Forthisreason,theBaseCaseassumesthattherewillbenoreprocessingoftheuraniumfuel,andspentfuelwillbedisposedofafterithasbeenused.
4.2.31Spentfuelshouldbecooledonsiteincoolingpondsforanappropriateperiod,andthentransferredtoanonsiteinterimstorependingdisposal.
Non-radioactive Hazardous Wastes from operations
4.2.32TheBaseCaseassumesthatnon-radioactivehazardouswastesfromoperationswillbemanagedaccordingtoregulatoryrequirementsandcurrentpracticesandwillbedisposedofusingestablisheddisposalroutes.
4.2.33Theoperationalperiodendsatthepointatwhichdecommissioningbegins.
33 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008
56
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Phase 4 – Decommissioning
4.2.34TheBaseCaseassumesthatdecommissioningbeginswhenthestationisshutdownandceasesgeneratingelectricityforthelasttime.
4.2.35TheprincipalStagesofthedecommissioningprocessaredescribedinTable4.
Table 4: Outline of principal stages of decommissioning
De-fuelling De-fuellingreactorforthelasttimeandtransferringthe●●
resultingspentfueltothefuelpond.
Stage 1 Conditioningandpackagingofpotentiallymobile●●
wastes(e.g.spentresins)
Transferofconditionedwastestointerimstorageto●●
awaitfinaldisposal.
Stage 2 Demolitionofnon-essentialnon-radioactivefacilities●●
(e.g.turbinehallandadministrativebuildingsthatwillnotbeneededtomanagethedecommissioningprocess)
Transferofspentfuelremainingincoolingpondto●●
interimstore
Stage 3 Dismantlingofreactorandanyotherstructures●●
remainingonsiteandmanagementanddisposalofresultingwaste.
Disposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel●●
frominterimstores34.
Remediationofsite●●
De-licensing●●
4.2.36Decommissioningofthepowerstationandremediationofthesiteistheresponsibilityofthesiteoperator,andwillbeundertakeninaccordancewithastructuredprogrammeagreedwiththeregulators.Thisprogrammewillbesetoutintheoperator’sDWMPandsubmittedtotheGovernmentforapproval.Whilstdetailedplanswillbedecidedonasite-by-sitebasis;theBaseCaseassumesthattheprocesswillcomprisethefollowinggenericsteps.
De-fuelling the reactor and removal of spent fuel from site
4.2.37Thereactorwillbede-fuelled,andtheresultingspentfuelstoredincoolingpondsforanappropriateperiodoftimebeforebeingtransferredtotheinterim
34 IfdisposalfacilitiesarenotavailablefortheintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelatthetimeofthescheduleagreedbetweentheGovernmentandtheoperatorforthedisposalofthesematerials,theGovernmentwouldtaketitletoandliabilityforthesematerialsandwouldexpecttocontinuetostorethemintheoperator’sinterimstore.Inthisscenario,theoperatorshouldbeinapositiontopursuede-licensingoftherestofthesite.Furtherdetailissetoutinparagraph2.18.
57
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
store,pendingtransferoftitleandliabilitytotheGovernment.Itisrecognisedthatfuelfromthelatterstagesofthereactor’slifemayhavetoremainonsiteforsomeyears,becauseoftheneedtoallowittocoolbeforetransportinganddisposingofitandthiswillbetakenintoaccount,alongwiththeestimatesofavailabilityofgeologicaldisposalfacilities,whentheSecretaryofStateagreesaschedulewithanoperatorfortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityfortheirspentfuel.Theoperatorisresponsiblefortheencapsulationandtransportofitsspentfueltothedisposalfacility.
Removal of operational and decommissioning intermediate level waste from site
4.2.38TitletoandliabilityforoperationalanddecommissioningintermediatelevelwastewillbetransferredtotheGovernmentaccordingtothescheduleagreedwhentheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisapprovedandassetoutinparagraphs2.14–2.24.Thisshouldenablewastetoberemovedfromsitewhenanappropriatedisposalrouteisavailable.Beforetitleandliabilitytransfers,theoperatorwillbeexpectedtoensureallwastesareconditionedinawaywhichisconsistentwiththerequirementsofUKregulatorsatthetimethewasteisconditioned.Conditioningmaybeundertakenbyanotherorganisation,undercontracttotheoperator,providedthatthearrangementsareacceptabletotheUKregulators.Theoperatorisresponsibleforthepackagingandtransportofitsintermediatelevelwastetothedisposalfacility.
Removal of decommissioning low level waste from site
4.2.39LowlevelwastearisingfromdecommissioningisexpectedtobemanagedanddisposedofinthesamewayasoperationallowlevelwasteandtheBaseCaseassumespromptdisposal.
Non-radioactive Hazardous Wastes from decommissioning
4.2.40TheBaseCaseassumesthatnon-radioactivehazardouswastesarisingasaresultofdecommissioningwillbemanagedaccordingtoregulatoryrequirementsandcurrentpracticesandwillbedisposedofusingestablisheddisposalroutes.
Decommissioning facilities
4.2.41Theoperator’sDWMPwillberequiredtoensurethatallfacilitiesonsitearedecommissionedinaccordancewithastructuredplan,whichisacceptableto
58
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
theregulatorsandwhichshouldreducethehazardpresentedbythesiteinasystematicmanner.
Care and maintenance
4.2.42Thebasecaseassumespromptdecommissioningofthereactor,withmaintenanceofstoragefacilitiesforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelcapableoflastingforatleast100yearsfromwhenwasteorspentfuelisfirstemplacedinthem.ItisopentooperatorstoproposeacareandmaintenanceperiodintheirDWMPsubmissions,buttheinclusionmustbeagreedwiththeregulatorsandapprovedbytheSecretaryofStateaspartoftheoperator’sFundedDecommissioningProgramme35.
Site remediation
4.2.43Decommissioningendswhenallstationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeenremovedandthesitehasbeenreturnedtoanendstatewhichhasbeenagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthority.Thisislikelytobeastatesimilarto“Greenfield”,dependingonthestateofthesitepriortoconstructionofthestation.Theendstatemustbeconsistentwiththerequirementsforreleaseofthesitefromthecontrolofanuclearsitelicence.
35 Acareandmaintenanceperiodallowsthebenefitsassociatedwithradioactivedecay(lowervolumesofintermediatelevelwasteandreduceddoseratestodecommissioningoperators)toberealised.Promptdecommissioning,however,meansthatthesitecanbefullyremediatedonashortertimescale.Thebalancebetweentheseissuesmaybeconsideredbyoperatorswithreferencetooperationalaswellasdesign-specificconsiderations.
59
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Ch
art
2: T
imel
ine
sett
ing
ou
t th
e p
has
es o
f th
e B
ase
Cas
e to
be
set
ou
t in
th
e D
WM
P
Pha
se
Task
Nam
e 1
2 3
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 1
1 12
13
14 1
5 16
17
18 1
9 20
21
22 2
3 24
25
26 2
7 28
29
30 3
1 32
33
34 3
5 36
37
38 3
9 40
41
42 4
3 44
45
46 4
7 48
49
50 5
1 52
53
54 5
5 56
57
58 5
9 60
61
62 6
3 64
65
66 6
7 68
69
70 7
1 72
73
74 7
5 76
77
78 7
9 80
81
82 8
3 84
85
86 8
7
Pha
se 1
Pr
epar
atio
n
an
d
pe
rmitt
ing
Pha
se 2
Co
nstr
uctio
n P
hase
3
Plan
t
oper
atio
n
Pha
se 4
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
–
Def
uelli
ng
Pha
se 4
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
–
Stag
e 1
Pha
se 4
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
–
Stag
e 2
Pha
se 4
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
–
Stag
e 3
Pha
se 4
D
ecom
mis
sion
ing
–
Fina
l Site
Clea
ranc
e
Was
te a
nd s
pent
Lo
w le
vel w
aste
f
uel m
anag
emen
t di
spat
ch
Was
te a
nd s
pent
Fu
el c
oolin
g f
uel m
anag
emen
t
Was
te a
nd s
pent
In
terim
sto
rage
f
uel m
anag
emen
t sp
ent f
uel
Was
te a
nd s
pent
In
term
edia
te
fue
l man
agem
ent
leve
l sto
rage
1) D
ates
are
yea
rs f
rom
sta
rt.
2) T
he
len
gth
s o
f th
e b
ar a
re e
stim
ates
fo
r a
gen
eric
nu
clea
r p
ow
er s
tati
on
.
3) T
he
go
vern
men
t w
ill a
gre
e to
tak
e ti
tle
and
liab
ility
to
an
op
erat
or’
s w
aste
acc
ord
ing
to
a s
ched
ule
th
at w
e ex
pec
t to
be
agre
ed a
t th
e sa
me
tim
e as
th
eir
Fun
ded
Dec
om
mis
sio
nin
g P
rog
ram
me
is a
pp
rove
d a
nd
alo
ng
sid
e se
ttin
g a
fix
ed u
nit
pri
ce f
or
the
was
te d
isp
osa
l ser
vice
. We
wo
uld
exp
ect
the
sch
edu
le t
o b
e al
ign
ed t
o t
he
esti
mat
es f
or
avai
lab
ility
of
dis
po
sal f
acili
ties
(w
hat
ever
th
ose
est
imat
es a
re a
t th
e ti
me
op
erat
ors
co
me
to u
s fo
r a
firm
vi
ew o
n a
fix
ed u
nit
pri
ce).
We
exp
ect
that
th
e sc
hed
ule
wo
uld
no
t b
egin
un
til a
fter
th
e o
per
ato
r’s
dec
om
mis
sio
nin
g p
rog
ram
me
has
oth
erw
ise
bee
n c
om
ple
ted
.
60
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.3BaseCase–WorkingAssumptionsList
4.3.1 ThecompletesetsofassumptionsunderlyingtheBaseCaseissetoutinTable5.Asummaryoftheassumptionsissetoutinparagraph4.1.9.Assetoutinparagraph4.1.11,theBaseCasedoesnotprescribethecontentsofaDWMP,sotherewillbeflexibilityforoperatorstosuggestandmakethecaseforalternativeapproachestowastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningiftheychoose.TheSecretaryofStatewillconsidereachDWMPonacasebycasebasis,althoughifaDWMPbroadlyconformstothebasecasepresentedhere,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoapproveit(orapproveitwithrelativelyminormodifications).
Table 5: Assumptions underlying the Base Case
Context and Decommissioning Strategy
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Regulatory regime
Theregulatoryregimetobeappliedtowastemanagementanddecommissioningisthatinforceatthepresenttime.
Definitionsofwastecategorieswillremainunchanged.
DoselimitsforworkersandthepublicwillremainunchangedfromthosesetoutintheIonisingRadiationRegulations199936.
Definition of decommissioning and decommissioning costs
Decommissioningbeginswhenthereactorisshutdownwithnointentionoffurtheruseforthepurposeofgeneratingelectricity.
Decommissioningendswhenallstationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeenremovedandthesitehasbeenreturnedanendstatewhichhasbeenagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthority.
Costsfordecommissioningshouldbestructuredtoensurethatthecostsofmanagementandinfrastructureforthestationunderdecommissioningarefullyaccountedfor.
Demolitionanddisposalofwastemanagementfacilitiesareregardedaspartofthedecommissioningactivity.
36 Theseregulationscanbefoundat:http://www.statutelaw.gov.uk/content.aspx?LegType=All+Legislation&title=ionising&Year=1999&searchEnacted=0&extentMatchOnly=0&confersPower=0&blanketAmendment=0&sortAlpha=0&TYPE=QS&PageNumber=1&NavFrom=0&parentActiveTextDocId=2778898&ActiveTextDocId=2778898&filesize=189255
61
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Care and Thebasecaseassumesnocareandmaintenanceperiodaftermaintenance thereactorhasbeenshutdownandbeforedecommissioning
takesplace.
Site end state Thefinalsiteendstatewillbesuchthatallstationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeenremoved,thesitereturnedtoastateagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthorityandreleasedfromthecontrolofthenuclearsitelicence(‘de-licensed’).
Thisislikelytobeastatesimilarto“Greenfield”,dependingonthestateofthesitepriortoconstructionofthestation.
Cost calculation Costsestimateswillbecalculatedonamoneyofyearbasis(Escalationand/ordiscountingtermswillbeappliedposttheinitialcostassessment)
Effect of reactor Thebasecasefordifferentreactordesignswillbethesamedesign on base whereveritisappropriate.case
Itwillbebasedonasinglestationoperatingforanassumedlifeof40years.
Decommissioning Decommissioningwillbeundertakenusingequipmentandtechniques techniquescurrentlyavailable.
62
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Waste Management
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) management and disposal
ILWfromoperationsanddecommissioningwillbestoredinsafeandsecureinterimstoresonthesiteofthepowerstationuntildecommissioninghasbeencompletedandageologicaldisposalfacilityisavailabletotakethewaste.
ILWfromoperationsanddecommissioningwillbedisposedofinageologicaldisposalfacility.ItwouldbedesirabletodisposeofILWfromnewnuclearpowerstationsinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilitiesaslegacywasteandwewillexplorethisthroughtheManagingRadioactiveWasteSafely(MRWS)programme.Thesizeofaprogrammeofnewnuclearpowerstationsandthespecificationofthesitechosenforthegeologicaldisposalfacilitywillhaveanimpactonwhetherallofthenewwastecouldbestoredinthesamedisposalfacilityaslegacywaste.WewillkeepthisunderreviewastheMRWSprogrammeprogressesandwillensurethatourcostmodellingmethodologyisabletoaccommodatealternativescenarios.
Althoughthedateatwhichageologicaldisposalfacilitywillbeavailableisasyetuncertain,increasedcertaintyonplanneddateswillbecomeavailableastheManagingRadioactiveWasteSafely(MRWS)programmeprogresses.
Conditioningandpackagingwasteinaformsuitablefordisposalwillbetheresponsibilityofthestationoperator.
ItisassumedthatoperationalILWwillbeconditionedandpackagedassoonasreasonablyfeasibleafteritisproduced,andbeforestorageon-site.
ConditioningcostsforoperationalILWareregardedasoperationalcostsandwillnotbepaidforfromtheFund.
ConditioningcostsfordecommissioningILWwillbemetfromtheFund.
63
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Intermediate Level Waste (ILW) management and disposal
TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofILWandaschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforthiswaste.Thiswillbesetinaccordancewiththeprocessdescribedinparagraphs2.9–2.24.Shouldtheactualcostsofprovidingthewastedisposalserviceprovelowerthanexpected,theselowercostswillnotbepassedontonuclearoperators,whowouldhavegainedfromcertaintyofafixedpriceandwouldnothavebeenexposedtotheriskofpriceescalation.
ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernment37willbebasedonaconservativeestimateofthecostsofdisposalofthewasteinaGeologicalDisposalFacility.Itwillincludeprovisionfor:
●● significantriskpremiumtocover:
●● theriskthattheeventualcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacilitytodisposeofILWarehigherthanestimated;
●● theriskthatconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcompleteattheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’sILW.
IfthesituationariseswhereconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcompleteattheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforwasteandtheoperatorhasotherwisecompleteditsFundedDecommissioningProgrammesatisfactorily,theGovernmentwouldtaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’swastebeforedisposalfacilitiesareavailable.InthesecircumstancestheGovernmentwouldneedtoprovideotherwastemanagementservicesthatmightinclude:
●● payingforinterimstoragefromthepointatwhichtheGovernmenttakestitletoandliabilityforthewasteuntilitcanbedisposedofinageologicaldisposalfacility;
●● re-licensingpartofreactorsitetoenabletheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityfortheinterimstores;
●● transportingILWtothegeologicaldisposalfacility;
●● thepossibilitythattheGovernmentmayhavetopaytocleanupcontaminatedlandonthesiteoftheinterimstores,ortore-packagethewaste/re-buildthestores;
●● decommissioningtheinterimstoresandtheresidualsite.
37 TheGovernment’spolicyonsettingafixedunitpriceforwastedisposalandaschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforthewasteissetoutinparagraphs2.9–2.24.Viewsonthispolicyarenotsoughtthroughthisconsultation.
64
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Intermediate Someofthese,suchasthecostsoftransportofwasteandtheLevel decommissioningoftheinterimstorewillbecostsforwhichWaste (ILW) theoperatorwillhavemadeprovisioninFund,butnotaspartmanagement ofthefixedunitprice.Inthecircumstancessetoutabove,theand disposal amountsthatoperatorshavebudgetedforthesecosts(set
outinthecosteddecommissioningprogrammethathasbeenagreedwiththeSecretaryofState)willpasstotheGovernmenttocoverthecostsofperformingtheseservices.Othercosts,suchaspayingforfurthermaintenanceofwasteininterimstoresorthepotentialforneedingtore-packagethewasteorre-buildthestores,willbemetbytheGovernment,butwillhavebeenfactoredintotheriskpremiumaddedtothefixedunitpricetocovertheriskthatconstructionofdisposalfacilitieswillnotbecompleteattheagreedschedule.
Theschedulewillcontainanestimateddateorseriesofdatesforthetransferoftitleandliability.ThesedateswillbelinkedtotheestimateddateforavailabilityofdisposalfacilitiestoacceptILWfromnewnuclearpowerstationsfordisposalatthetimewhenthescheduleisagreed.Weexpectthatthedateswillbenosoonerthanthatforthecompletionofdecommissioninggivenintheoperator’sagreedFundedDecommissioningProgramme.If,intheevent,theFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisnotcompletedtoschedule,transferoftitletoandliabilityforILW,andallfinancialandotherresponsibilityforthewaste,willbedeferredandresponsibilitywillremainwiththeoperatoruntiltheFundedDecommissioningProgrammehasbeencompleted.
TheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttoretainthepowerfortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforILWbeforetheendofthegeneratinglifeofthestation,ifadisposalroutebecameavailableduringthatperiod.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttodiscusswithoperatorsinindividualcasestodeterminearrangementsthatwouldensurethattheirFundwasadequatetofundpaymentsatthistime.
65
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Spent fuel (SF) Newnuclearpowerstationswilluseuraniumoruraniumoxidemanagement fuel.and disposal TheNuclearWhitePapersetoutthatnewnuclearpower
stationsshouldproceedonthebasisthatSFwillnotbereprocessed.Thusthebasecaseassumesthattherewillbenore-processingoftheuraniumfuel,andSFwillbedisposedofafterithasbeenused.
Spentfuelwillbestoredincoolingpondsforaperiodoftime,followedbystorageinsafeandsecureinterimstoresonthesiteofthepowerstationuntildecommissioninghasbeencompletedandageologicaldisposalfacilityisavailabletoaccommodateit.
Spentfuelwillbedisposedofinageologicaldisposalfacility.ItwouldbedesirabletodisposeofspentfuelfromnewnuclearpowerstationsinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilitiesaslegacywasteandwewillexplorethisthroughtheManagingRadioactiveWasteSafely(MRWS)programme.Thesizeofaprogrammeofnewnuclearpowerstationsandthespecificationofthesitechosenforthegeologicaldisposalfacilitywillhaveanimpactonwhetherallofthespentfuelfromnewnuclearpowerstationscouldbestoredinthesamegeologicaldisposalfacilityaslegacywaste.WewillkeepthisunderreviewastheMRWSprogrammeprogressesandwillensurethatourcostmodellingmethodologyisabletoaccommodatealternativescenarios.
Althoughthedateatwhichageologicaldisposalfacilitywillbeavailableisasyetuncertain,increasedcertaintyonplanneddateswillbecomeavailableastheManagingRadioactiveWasteSafely(MRWS)programmeprogresses.
TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofspentfuelandaschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforthiswaste.Thiswillbesetinaccordancewiththeprocessdescribedinparagraphs2.9–2.24.Shouldtheactualcostsofprovidingthewastedisposalserviceprovelowerthanexpected,theselowercostswillnotbepassedontooperators,whowouldhavegainedfromcertaintyofafixedunitpriceandwouldnothavebeenexposedtotheriskofpriceescalation.
ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentwillbebasedonaconservativeestimateofthecostsofdisposalofthespentfuelinageologicaldisposalfacility.Itwillincludeprovisionfor:
66
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
●● significantriskpremiumtocover:
●● theriskthattheeventualcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacilitytodisposeofspentfuelarehigherthanestimated;
●● theriskthatconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcompleteattheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’sspentfuel.
IfthesituationariseswhereconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcompleteattheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforwasteandtheoperatorhasotherwisecompleteditsFundedDecommissioningProgrammesatisfactorily,theGovernmentwouldtaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’swastebeforedisposalfacilitiesareavailable.InthesecircumstancestheGovernmentwouldneedtoprovideotherwastemanagementservicesthatmightinclude:
●● payingforinterimstoragefromthepointatwhichtheGovernmenttakestitletoandliabilityfortheSFuntilitcanbedisposedofinageologicaldisposalfacility;
●● conditioningandencapsulatingSFinaformsuitablefordisposal(weassumethatitwillnotbepossibletodothisinadvanceofdisposal);
●● re-licensingpartofreactorsitetoenabletheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityfortheinterimstores;
●● transportingSFtothegeologicaldisposalfacility;
●● thepossibilitythattheGovernmentmayhavetopaytocleanupcontaminatedlandonthesiteoftheinterimstores,ortore-buildthestores;
●● decommissioningtheinterimstoresandtheresidualsite.
67
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Someofthese,suchasthecostsoftransportofSFandthedecommissioningoftheinterimstorewillbecostsforwhichtheoperatorwillhavemadeprovisionintheirFund,butnotaspartofthefixedunitprice.Inthecircumstancessetoutabove,theamountsthatoperatorshavebudgetedforthesecosts(setoutintheFundedDecommissioningProgrammethathasbeenagreedwiththeSecretaryofStatewillpasstotheGovernmenttocoverthecostsofperformingtheseservices.Othercosts,suchaspayingforfurthermaintenanceofSFininterimstoresorthepotentialforneedingtore-buildthestores,willbemetbytheGovernment,butwillhavebeenfactoredintotheriskpremiumaddedtothefixedunitpricetocovertheriskthatconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitieswillnotbecompleteinaccordancewiththeagreedschedule.
TheschedulewillcontainanestimateddateorseriesofdatesforthetransferoftitleandliabilitytotheGovernment.ThesedateswillbelinkedtotheestimateddateforavailabilityofdisposalfacilitiestoacceptSFfromnewnuclearpowerstationsfordisposalatthetimewhenthescheduleisagreed.WeexpectthatthedatewillbenosoonerthanthatgivenforthecompletionofdecommissioninggivenintheoperatorsagreedFundedDecommissioningProgramme.If,intheevent,theFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisnotcompletedtoschedule,transferoftitletoandliabilityforSF,andallfinancialandotherresponsibilityfortheSF,willbedeferredandresponsibilitywillremainwiththeoperatoruntiltheFundedDecommissioningProgrammehasbeencompleted.
TheSecretaryofStatewillexpecttoretainthepowerfortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforSFbeforetheendofthegeneratinglifeofthestation,ifadisposalroutebecameavailableduringthatperiod.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttodiscusswithoperatorsinindividualcasestodeterminearrangementsthatwouldensurethattheirFundwasadequatetofundpaymentsatthistime.
68
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Low Level Waste (LLW) management and disposal
LLWwillbedisposedofpromptlyafterithasbeengeneratedinasuitabledisposalfacility.DisposalwillbeatthefacilitycurrentlyoperatinginWestCumbriaorasuccessorfacility.
ThecostsofoperationalLLWdisposalwillbemetfromoperationalexpenditure.
ThecostsofdisposingofdecommissioningLLWwillbemetfromtheFund.TheGovernmentwillnotsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofLLW,asitwillforthedisposalofILWandSF.
LLWdisposalfacilitieswillbeavailabletonewnuclearpowerstationswheneverrequired.
Packagingwasteintoaformsuitablefordisposalwillbetheresponsibilityofthestationoperator. ItisassumedthatLLWwillnotbeconditionedonsite.
TransportofLLW(andallassociatedancillarycostsincludingthecostsoftransportequipment)fromitspointoforigintotheLLWdisposalfacilitywillbetheresponsibilityofthestationoperator.
TitletoandliabilityforanLLWwastepackagewillpasstothedisposalfacilityoperatoratthepointatwhichthewastepackagehasbeendeliveredtotheLLWdisposalfacilityandacceptedbythedisposalfacilityoperatorasfulfillingtheappropriatewasteacceptancecriteria.
Non-radioactive hazardous waste management and disposal
TheBaseCaseassumesthatnon-radioactivehazardouswastesarisingasaresultofoperationsanddecommissioningwillbemanagedaccordingtoregulatoryrequirementsandcurrentpracticesandwillbedisposedofpromptlyusingestablisheddisposalroutes.
Thecostsofmanaginganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromoperationswillbemetfromoperationalexpenditure.
Thecostsofmanaginganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromdecommissioningwillbemetfromtheFund.
TheGovernmentwillnotsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofnon-radioactivehazardouswaste,asitwillforthedisposalofILWandSF.
Waste conditioning
Wastewillbeconditionedinamannerandonatimescalewhichisconsistentwithcurrentregulatoryrequirements.
69
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
ISSUE ASSUMPTIONS
Treatment of wastes arising as a result of reactor refurbishment
Thiswillbemanagedinthesamewayasoperationalwastesandpaidforfromoperationalexpenditure.
Provision of Operatorswillbeobligedtoprovidesafeandsecureinteriminterim stores storagefacilitiesthataretechnicallycapableofbeingmaintainedfor ILW and orreplacedtolastforatleast100yearsfromthetimewastespent fuel (SF) isfirstemplacedinthem.Iftheoperator’splanstatesthat
thestoreswillneedtobereplacedinordertolastforatleast100years,thentheoperatorwillneedtoincludeintheircontributionstotheFundprovisiontoreplacethestores.
Thecostsofbuilding(andpossiblyreplacing)interimstoresforILWandspentfuelwillbesetasideandpaidforfromtheFund,insofarastheyhavenotbeenbuiltaspartoftheconstructionofthestation.
Operatorswillbeobligedtoprovidethestoresforuseastheyareneeded,subjecttoagreementwiththeregulatorsandtheSecretaryofState.
70
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.4ClassificationofCostsarisingundertheBaseCase
Meeting the Costs of Waste Management, Disposal and Decommissioning
4.4.1 Itwillbeimportantforoperators(andothers)tohaveclarityonwhichcoststheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttobepaidforfromtheFundandwhichmayberegardedasoperationalcosts,whichwouldnotbepaidforfromtheFund,andwouldnotberegulatedundertheFundingArrangementPlanbytheprovisionsoftheEnergyBill(althoughtheactivitiesnotpaidforfromtheFundwouldstillberegulatedbytheBillbyvirtueoftheirinclusionintheDWMP).Table6showswhichwastemanagementanddecommissioningcostswillbeexpectedtobedischargedfromtheFundandwhichwouldbeexpectedtobemetfromoperationalexpenditure.
4.4.2 TheEnergyBillrequiresthatoperatorsprovidetotheSecretaryofStatedetailsoftheirplansformanaginganddisposingofallwastes,whethertheirfinancingisregulatedbytheBillornot.Further,theBillrequiresoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationstosetasidesufficientfundstocovertheirfulldecommissioningcostsandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementcostsandprovidecostestimatesinrelationthereto.Sofarasthemattersreferredtointhe“operationalcosts”columninTable6areconcerned,forthereasonssetoutinparagraph4.1.5theSecretaryofStatedoesnotconsideritappropriatetoimposealegaldutyonoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationstoprovidecostestimates,nordetailsofthefinancialsecurityputinplace.
4.4.3 Thatsaid,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpectoperatorstoprovidehimwithcostestimatesforthemanagementofwastesthatwillbemetfromoperationalexpenditure(assetoutbelow)forinformation.Thiswillprovideconfidencethatthesecostshavebeengivenproperconsiderationbytheoperatoralongwithalltheothercostsofmanaginganddisposingofwasteanddecommissioningthroughoutthelifetimeofthestation.
4.4.4 Althoughwearenotspecificallyconsultingonthisissue,respondentstothisconsultationarefreetocommentonwhetherthereareotheroperationalwastecoststhatoughttobemetfromtheFund.AfterRoyalAssentoftheBill,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttomakeanordersettingoutthoseoperationalwastecosts(technicalmatters)thatwillbepaidforfromtheFund(i.e.makingthemdesignatedtechnicalmatters).
71
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Table 6: Summary of principal cost streams and how they will be met
Cost How cost will be met Included in fixed unit price?
Decommissioningthestation IndependentFund No
LowLevelWaste(LLW)
PackaginganddisposalofLLW●●
fromoperations,includingtransport
Packaginganddisposalof●●
LLWfromdecommissioning,includingtransport
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
N/A
No
IntermediateLevelWaste(ILW)
Conditioningandpackagingof●●
operationalILW
Buildingandmaintenanceof●●
interimstoresforILW38
Conditioningandpackagingof●●
decommissioningILW
Transportofoperationaland●●
decommissioningILWfordisposal
Disposalofoperationaland●●
decommissioningILW
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
N/A
No
No
No
Yes
SpentFuel(SF)
Operationoffuelpondsduring●●
thegeneratinglifeofstation
Operationoffuelpondsafter●●
thegeneratinglifeofstation
Buildingandmaintenanceof●●
interimstoresforSF39
TransportofSFfordisposal●●
EncapsulationofSFfordisposal●●
DisposalofallSF●●
OperationalExpenditure
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
IndependentFund
N/A
No
No
No
No
Yes
38 Iftheinterimstoresarebuiltaspartofthestationconstruction,thecostsoftheirconstructionwillnotbemetfromtheFund.
39Iftheinterimstoresarebuiltaspartofthestationconstruction,thecostsoftheirconstructionwillnotbemetfromtheFund.
72
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Cost How cost will be met Included in fixed unit price?
Non-radioactivehazardouswaste
●● Managinganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromoperations
OperationalExpenditure
N/A
●● Managinganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswastefromdecommissioning
IndependentFund No
Planning
●● Decommissioningplanningbeforestartofgeneration
OperationalExpenditure N/A
●● Pre-closuredecommissioningplanning
IndependentFund No
●● Anyplanningcarriedoutduringdecommissioning
IndependentFund No
OtherCosts
●● Allothercostsassociatedwithoperatingthesiteuntilendofitsgeneratinglife.Thesecostsinclude,butarenotnecessarilylimitedto,thoseassociatedwithmaintainingtheinfrastructurenecessaryfortheoperatortobeaholderofanuclearsitelicence40
OperationalExpenditure
N/A
●● Allothercostsassociatedwithoperatingthesiteafterendofitsgeneratinglifeanduntilthesitelicenceissurrendered.Thesecostsinclude,butarenotnecessarilylimitedto,thoseassociatedwithmaintainingtheinfrastructurenecessaryfortheoperatortobeaholderofanuclearsitelicence41
IndependentFund No
4041
40 Thesecostsarelikelytoincludethecostsofsecurityforthesite,sitemonitoring,ongoingmaintenanceatthesite(otherthanmaintenanceoftheinterimstoresforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel)andliaisonwiththeregulators.
41 Thesecostsarelikelytoincludethecostsofsecurityforthesite,sitemonitoring,ongoingmaintenanceatthesite(otherthanmaintenanceoftheinterimstoresforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel)andliaisonwiththeregulators.
73
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.5MethodologyforCostCalculations
Background
4.5.1 Toestimatethecostsassociatedwithdecommissioningandwastemanagementanddisposalliabilitiesinordertocomplywithclause41(7)(b)oftheEnergyBill,operatorswillneedtocosttheirDWMP.
4.5.2 TheGovernmenthasestablishedaBaseCase,whichdefinesaprudentlifecyclebaselineagainstwhichpotentialoperatorscanproducecostestimates.FurtherdetailontheBaseCaseissetoutearlierinthisguidance.
4.5.3 Thecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningwillbemetbytheoperatorfromoperationalexpenditureorfrompaymentstheywillmakeintoaFund.OperatorswillberequiredtoprovideestimatestotheSecretaryofStateforallthewastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningcoststheywillmeetfromtheFund.TheGovernmentwillalsoexpectoperatorstoassessthecostsofwastemanagementitemsthatwillnotbepaidfromtheFundinasimilarlyprudentwayandstronglyencouragesoperatorstoincludethesecostsintheDWMPtheysubmittotheSecretaryofState.Paragraphs4.4.1–4.4.4andTable6setoutfurtherinformationonwhichcostsweexpectwillbemetfromoperationalexpenditureandwhichfromtheFund.
The need to model costs
4.5.4 ItisimportantfortheGovernmenttodeveloprobustupdatedestimatesofthecostsofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningandtothisendwehavedevelopedamethodologytoallowustoestimatethesecosts.Operatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationswillbeexpectedtocalculatetheirowncostestimatesforwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioning.Operators’ownestimateswilldifferfromthoseproducedbytheGovernmentastheywillbespecifictothereactordesign,siteandotheroperationaldecisionsoftheoperator,ratherthangeneric.However, thismethodologywillprovideoperatorswithanexampleofhowtheymightcalculatetheirowncostestimates;aswellasensuringthattheGovernment,theNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard(NLFAB)andthoseresponsibleformanagingoperators’Fundshaveabenchmarkagainstwhichtoassesstheestimatesproducedbytheoperators.
4.5.5 TheNuclearDecommissioningAuthority(NDA)isdevelopingaparametriccostmodelwhichtheywillusetogenerateupdatedestimatesofthecostsofgeologicaldisposal.CostestimatesfrombothBERR’sandtheNDA’scost
74
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
modelsrelatingtothedisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelwill,together,enabletheGovernmenttosetaprudentfixedunitpriceforoperatorsforprovidingadisposalserviceforthesewastes.
4.5.6 Themethodologythathasbeendevelopedwillallowestimatestobemadeofwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningcosts,aswellasallowingtheassociateduncertaintiestobeestimated,andtherelativesignificanceoftheseuncertaintiestobeassessed.Themethodologyallowsthecalculationofthetotalsizeoftheliability,thespendprofileassociatedwithdischargingtheliability,andthusdiscountedcosts.Thisdocumentdescribesthemethodologyinoutline.
4.5.7 WearepublishingtheBERRcostmodellingmethodologyhereforconsultationtoseekviews.Wearenotsettingoutupdatedcostestimatesatthisstage.TheRoadmapinTable2setsoutanindicativetimelinetopublishingcostestimates,althoughthisdoesnotformpartofthisconsultationandisincludedforinformationonly.
Overview of methodology
4.5.8 Thetotalliabilityofoperatorsforwastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningcanberegardedasfallingintofivebroadareas:
Themanagementanddisposalofspentfuel;●●
Themanagementanddisposalofintermediatelevelwaste;●●
Themanagementanddisposaloflowlevelwaste;●●
Themanagementanddisposalofnon-radioactivehazardouswaste;and●●
Decommissioningcosts–thosecostsassociatedwithdemolishingthe●●
powerstationandremediationofthesite,excludingwastemanagementcosts.
4.5.9 IntheirDWMP,operatorsmustsetdownaplanfordealingwithallareasofhazardouswastemanagement,disposalanddecommissioningfortheirpowerstation,asidentifiedintheBaseCase.
4.5.10Themethodologydescribedhereisdesignedtocalculateestimatesofthecompletecostsofwastemanagementanddecommissioning,althoughitalsoallowsfortheseparationofthosecoststhatwillbemetfromoperationalrevenuesfromthosethatwillfalltotheFund.
Spent fuel
4.5.11Thecostsassociatedwiththemanagementanddisposalofspentfuelresultfrom:
75
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Thecostofstoringspentfuelincoolingpondsandthenininterimstores●●
duringthegeneratinglifeofthestationandafterthestationhasceasedgenerating,untiltitletoandliabilityforthefueltransferstotheGovernment;
Theconstructionandmaintenanceofinterimstorestoaccommodatethe●●
spentfueluntilitcanbedisposedof;
Thecostsoftransportingthespentfuelfordisposal;●●
Thecostsofencapsulatingthespentfuel;and●●
ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentinreturnforprovidinga●●
wastedisposalservice.
4.5.12Allofthesecostsarecalculatedonthebasisofaninventoryforthismaterialandunitcost.Theinventoryofthestoreiscalculatedasfollows.Fuelisunloadedfromthereactorandtransferredtoapondwhereitisheldforaperiodtoallowheatgeneratedbythespentfueltofalltolevelsacceptableforstorage.Thisperiodwilldependuponthetypeandrateofburn-upofthefuel.Thecooledfuelisthentransferredtointerimstorage.Giventherateatwhichfuelisdischargedfromthereactor,andthelengthoftimethefuelisheldinthecoolingpond,theinventoryofthefuelintheinterimstorecanbecalculatedasafunctionoftime.
4.5.13Thecostsassociatedwithfuelstorageinagivenyearcanbecalculatedastheproductofthestoreinventoryandthecostofstorageforeachunitoffuel.Thisisexpressedasthecostperunitoffuelperyear.Thisunitcostincludesanallowanceforthecostofstoreconstruction,asitisassumedthatthestoreswillbeconstructedastheyarerequired,andforstoreoperationandmaintenance.Thetotalstoragecostcanthereforebecalculatedasthesumofyearlystoragecostsuptothepointwherethespentfuelisdisposedof.
4.5.14Theoverallcostofmanagingasingleunitofspentfueliscalculatedasthesumoftheunitcostsforstorage,encapsulation,transportationtothedisposalfacility,andthefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentforprovisionofadisposalserviceperunitoffuel.Thetotalcostsassociatedwiththeseactivitiesforthepowerstationarethencalculatedastheproductoftheamountofspentfuelproducedduringthelifetimeofthepowerstationandthetotalunitcostfortheseactivities.
4.5.15ThecostsofencapsulationandtransportofspentfuelareassumedtobeincurredimmediatelybeforetitletoandliabilityforthespentfueltransferstotheGovernmentfordisposal.
4.5.16ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentforthedisposalofspentfuelisassumedtobeincurredinaccordancewiththescheduleagreedbetweentheGovernmentandtheoperatorbeforethepowerstationisconstructed.Thefixedunitpricewillbebasedonanestimateofthecostsofdisposingofoperators’spentfuelinageologicaldisposalfacilityandwillincludethefollowingitems:
Theprojectedfullcostsofdisposingofspentfuelinageologicaldisposal●●
facility;
76
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Significantriskpremiumtocover:●●
theriskthattheeventualcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacilityto●O
disposeofspentfuelarehigherthanestimated;
theriskthatconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcomplete●O
attheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’sspentfuel.
4.5.17ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentisexpressedintermsofunitcost,multipliedbytheamountoffuelfordisposal.
intermediate level waste
4.5.18Totalcostsassociatedwiththemanagementanddisposalofintermediatelevelwastearecalculatedusingamethodologyanalogoustothatusedforspentfuel.
4.5.19Theinventoryofoperationalintermediatelevelwasteinstoreattheendofgenerationiscalculatedfromthegeneratinglifetimeofthereactorandtherateatwhichoperationalintermediatelevelwasteisgenerated.Aftertheendofgeneration,theinventoryofthismaterialinthestoreiscalculatedyear-on-year,basedontheinventoryattheendofgenerationandthesmallannualgenerationofintermediatelevelwastefromongoingoperationalactivities(forexample,wastesarisingfromongoingoperationsinthefuelpondsasthefinaltranchesoffuelarecooledandtransferredtotheinterimstore).
4.5.20Theinventoryofdecommissioningwastesinstoreiscalculatedyearonyearfromestimatesofthetotalvolumeofdecommissioningintermediatelevelwaste,thedurationofdecommissioningactivities,andthetimeframesfordecommissioningactivitiesinthedecommissioningplan.Wastesareassumedtobeconditionedpromptly,andtransferredtothestoreintheyearinwhichtheyaregenerated.
4.5.21Thecostsassociatedwiththestorageofintermediatelevelwasteinagivenyearcanthenbecalculatedfromtheinventoryofoperationalanddecommissioningwastesinstoreandthecostofstorageforeachunitofintermediatelevelwaste,expressedasthecostperunitofintermediatelevelwasteperyear.Thisunitcostincludesanallowanceforthecostofstoreconstruction,asitisassumedthatthestoreswillbeconstructedastheyarerequiredandfortheoperationandmaintenanceofthestore.Thetotalstoragecostcanthereforebecalculatedasthesumofyearlystoragecostsuptothepointwheretheintermediatelevelwasteisdisposedof.
4.5.22Thecostsforconditioningintermediatelevelwastearecalculatedyear-on-year,basedoncalculatedwastevolumestobeconditionedinagivenyearandthecostofwasteconditioningforeachunitofwaste.
77
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.5.23ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentforthedisposalofintermediatelevelwasteisassumedtobeincurredinaccordancewiththescheduleagreedbetweentheGovernmentandtheoperatorbeforethepowerstationisconstructed.Thefixedunitpricewillbebasedonanestimateofthecostsofdisposingofoperators’intermediatelevelwasteinageologicaldisposalfacilityandwillincludethefollowingitems:
Theprojectedfullcostsofdisposingofintermediatelevelwasteina●●
geologicaldisposalfacility;
Significantriskpremiumtocover:●●
theriskthattheeventualcostsofbuildingageologicaldisposalfacilityto●O
disposeofintermediatelevelwastearehigherthanestimated;
theriskthatconstructionofgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesisnotcomplete●O
attheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’sintermediatelevelwaste.
4.5.24ThefixedunitpricepayabletotheGovernmentisexpressedintermsofthecostperunitofintermediatelevelwaste,multipliedbytheamountofthiswastefordisposal.
low level waste
4.5.25Lowlevelwasteisassumedtobedisposedofassoonasfeasibleafteritisgenerated,withouttheneedforsignificantinterimstorage.Thecostelementsassociatedwiththemanagementoflowlevelwastearetherefore:
Packaging;●●
Transporttoasuitabledisposalfacility;●●
Disposalinasuitabledisposalfacility.●●
4.5.26Operatorswillberequiredtoensurethatanyfacilitiesneededforpackagingareavailableonsite.Itisassumedthatlow-levelwastewillnotbeconditionedonsiteandthatconditioningfacilitieswillthereforenotbeneeded.
4.5.27Lowlevelwastearisesthroughoperationsandfromdecommissioningactivities.Theannualquantityoflowlevelwastearisingfromoperationsisbasedoninformationonrawwastearisingsprovidedbythereactordesigners42,coupledwithanassessmentofthechangesinwastevolumesbroughtaboutbythemanagementroutesenvisaged.
4.5.28Theannualquantityoflowlevelwastearisingfromdecommissioningiscalculatedyearonyearfromestimatesofthetotalvolumeofdecommissioning
42 ThisinformationhastodatebeenprovidedbythedesignersofthosereactorscurrentlybeingassessedthroughtheGenericDesignAssessment(GDA)process.FurtherinformationontheGDAprocessandthereactorsbeingassessedcanbefoundathttp://www.hse.gov.uk/newreactors/index.htm
78
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
lowlevelwaste,thedurationofdecommissioningactivities,andthetimeframesfordecommissioningactivitiesinthedecommissioningplan.
4.5.29Thecostforlowlevelwastemanagementinanyyeariscalculatedfromtheannualarisingsoflowlevelwasteandtheunitcostsforpackaging,transportanddisposal.
non-radioactive hazardous waste
4.5.30Non-radioactivehazardouswasteisassumedtobepackagedandtransferredtoasuitablecommercialcontractorfordisposalpromptlyafterithasbeengenerated.Paymentforthisserviceismadeatthepointatwhichwasteistransferredtothecontractor.Thisarrangementisdirectlyanalogoustothatdescribedaboveforlowlevelwasteand,assuch,thecostsofthedisposalofnon-radioactivehazardouswastearecalculatedinthesamewayasthecostsforlowlevelwaste.
Decommissioning and site remediation
4.5.31Thecostsofdecommissioningandsiteremediationarecalculatedfromengineeringestimates,andareimporteddirectlyintotheoverallcostcalculation.ThesecostsarephasedinaccordancewiththetimescalessetoutinthetimelineonthephasesoftheBaseCase,setoutinChart2.
The estimation of uncertainty in overall cost estimates
4.5.32 Themethodologysofardescribedallowscalculationofacentralestimatefordecommissioning,wastemanagementanddisposalcosts.Inordertoevaluateaninflation,riskanduncertaintyadjustedestimateofthesecosts,whichisconservativeandensuresthatrisktothetaxpayerisremote,itisnecessarytoestimateadistributionofcostswhichrepresents,asfaraspossible,theuncertaintiesinthecostestimates.
4.5.33Themethodologyusedtoestimatethepossiblerangeforthecostsidentifieskeyparametersforthecostcalculation,whichcouldincludewastevolumes,costsordates.Technicalexpertiseandjudgementisthenusedtoestimatepossiblerangesfortheseparametersandtoassignsimpledistributionstothem.ThedistributioninthesizeoftheliabilitiesisthencalculatedfromthedatabyMonteCarlomethods.
4.5.34Inthistechnique,themodelisrunmanytimesusingdifferentvaluesfortheinputparameters.Thevaluesforeachparameterarechosensothat,afterrepeatedruns,thesetofvalueschosenforeachinputparameterreflectsthedistributionassignedtoit.Thedistributionofresultsprovidesapictureofthedistributionoftheoverallliability.
79
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
4.5.35Usingthisinformationitispossibletodetermineacostestimatewhichwillcoverthecostsofdecommissioningandwastemanagementanddisposalwithahighdegreeofcertainty.
Using the cost estimates to set a fixed unit price for waste disposal
4.5.36Paragraphs2.9–2.13setoutthattheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpricetooperatorsfordisposaloftheirintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel,andwillincludeinthefixedunitpriceasignificantriskpremium.
4.5.37Assetoutabove,theGovernmentintendstouseBERR’sandtheNDA’scostmodellingworktodeterminetheappropriatelevelforthefixedunitprice.TheGovernmentwilltakeaconservativeviewofthecostestimatesfordisposalofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuelandwillusethedistributionofcostsgeneratedbytheMonteCarloanalysistoassesstherisksassociatedwiththeestimates.ThisworkwillenabletheGovernmenttodeterminetheriskpremiumthatshouldbeaddedtotheconservativeestimatesofcoststoreachthefixedunitpricetheywishtosetforoperators.WewilluseasimilarmethodologytoinformtheprocessbywhichtheGovernmentwilldeterminetheappropriateamountthatshouldbeincludedintheriskpremiumtocovertheriskthatconstructionofdisposalfacilitiesisnotcompletebytheagreedschedulefortheGovernmenttotaketitletoandliabilityforanoperator’swasteandspentfuel.
4.5.38Thefixedunitpricesetforoperatorswillbedeterminedineachcasebyreferencetotheestimatesofcostsandthelevelofcertaintywehaveinthosecosts.Overtime,wewilldevelopagreaterunderstandingoftheactualcostsofdisposingofintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel.ThisgreatercertaintyabouttheunderlyingcostsmayenabletheGovernmenttoreducethelevelofriskpremiumtheywillrequire.However,intheearlystages,weexpecttheriskpremiumwerequiretobesignificanttoreflectourlevelofcertaintyinthecostestimates.
4.5.39TheRoadmapinparagraphs2.25–2.32andTable2setsoutanindicativetimetableforpublishingthedetailedmethodologyforestablishingthefixedunitpriceforintermediatelevelwasteandspentfueldisposal.
80
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
81
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Section5:FundingArrangementsPlanGuidance
Contents
5.1 ContentofFundingArrangementPlan
5.2 ObjectiveandGuidingPrinciples
5.3 Fundstructure
5.4 Fundgovernance
5.5 TargetvaluefortheFundandcontributionstotheFund
5.6 Reviewandreporting
5.7 Investmentpolicy
5.8 Payment/disbursementpolicy
5.9 WindinguptheFund
5.10 ProtectionagainstaninsufficientFund
5.11 Proposalsforremedialaction
5.12 Changeinownershiporcontroloftheoperatororsite
5.13 SecretaryofState’spowertomodifyaFundedDecommissioningProgramme
5.14 Glossary
82
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.1ContentoftheFundingArrangementPlan
5.1.1 ThisdocumentcontainsguidanceforoperatorsofnewnuclearpowerstationstoassistthemindrawingupaFundingArrangementPlan(FAP).TheFundingArrangementPlanisthatpartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhichaddressesthosemattersreferredtoinclause41(7)(c)oftheEnergyBill(namelythesecuritytobeprovidedinconnectionwiththeestimatesofcostsofthedesignatedtechnicalmatters).TogetherwithseparateDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan(DWMP)guidanceinSection4ofthisdocument,thisguidanceprovidesinformationonwhatanapprovableFundedDecommissioningProgrammeshouldcontain.
5.1.2 TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetouttheoperator’sdetailedplansforoneormoreFundstodeliversufficientmoneystomeetitsdecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalliabilitiesidentifiedintheoperator’sDWMP,includingproposalstoensurethatrisksareadequatelymanagedsuchthattheFundissufficienttomeettheseliabilitiesastheyfalldue.
5.1.3 TheFundingArrangementsPlansectionoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemustcoveralldecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalcostswhichareincurredaftertheendofgenerationplusanywastecoststhatariseduringgenerationasspecifiedinanordermadeunderclause41(6)oftheEnergyBill.OngoingwastemanagementcostsduringthegeneratinglifetimeofthestationmustbemetbytheoperatorfromitsoperatingexpenditureandwouldnotthereforebeexpectedtobemetfromtheFund(seeTable6).
5.1.4 ItisforeachoperatortosetoutinitsFundingArrangementPlantheprecisedetailsforestablishing,contributingto,maintainingandadministeringtheFundanddisbursementsfromittogetherwithalloranyotherformsofadditionalsecuritytoaddressriskssuchastheinsufficiencyoftheFund.TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldfollowthemodelframeworksetoutbelowasfarasitispracticabletodoso:
1. BackgroundInformation
2. DescriptionofFundStructure
3. ExplanationofFundGovernance
4. TargetvalueforFundandcontributionscheduletoFund
5. ReviewProcess
83
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
6. FundInvestmentPolicy
7. PaymentandDisbursementPolicy
8. WindinguptheFund
9. FinancialsecurityagainstearlydecommissioningriskandFundinsufficiency
10.ProposalsforremedialactiontomakegoodanyshortfallintheFundduringstationgeneratinglife
11.Changeinownershiporcontroloftheoperatororsite
5.1.5 EachFundingArrangementPlanmustbesupportedbydetailedanalyses,reportsanddocumentationinrespectofthestructure,governanceandoperationalarrangementsoftheFundsuchastheSecretaryofStatemayrequest.
5.1.6 TheremainderofthisguidanceprovidesfurtherinformationtoassistoperatorsinpreparingandsubmittingtheirFundingArrangementPlanforapproval.
5.1.7 TheFundingArrangementPlanGuidanceusesanumberofdefinedterms.AGlossaryofthesetermsissetoutattheendofthisguidance(seeparagraph5.14.1).Pleaserefertotheglossaryforthedefinitionorexplanationoftermsusedinthisguidance.
84
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.2ObjectiveandGuidingPrinciples
5.2.1 Thissection,5.2,setsouttheObjectivethattheSecretaryofStatewillexpectthearrangementsundertheFundingArrangementPlantoachieveandtheGuidingPrincipleswhichhewillapplywhenconsideringwhethertoapprovethosearrangementsortomodifythem.TheSecretaryofState’soverridingconcernistoensurethatoperators,andnotGovernment,meetthefullcostsofdecommissioningandtheirfullshareofwastemanagementcosts.
Objective
5.2.2 AssetoutintheNuclearWhitePaper43,theSecretaryofStatewillrequirethefundingarrangementsundertheoperator’sFundedDecommissioningProgrammetoberobustandensurethatsufficientfundsaresetasideduringtheelectricitygeneratinglifetimeofthenewnuclearpowerstation,toensurethatoperatorsareabletomeetinfullasandwhennecessary:
thefullcostsofdecommissioningtheirinstallations;●●
theirfullshareofthecostsofsafelyandsecurelymanaginganddisposingof●●
theirwaste.
Itistheoperator’sdutytoensurethatthisobjectiveismet.
5.2.3 ToachievetheObjectiveinparagraph5.2.2,(alsosetoutinparagraphs3.49and3.55oftheNuclearWhitePaper),theSecretaryofStatewillexpectthatpriortothestartofcommissioninganewnuclearpowerstation,theoperatorwillcreateanindependentFundtoaccumulate,investandmanagepaymentsreceivedtomeettheabovecosts.Thesepaymentsmustbeaccumulated,investedanddisbursedassetoutintheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeandapprovedbytheSecretaryofStatebyreferencetotheGuidingPrinciplessetoutbelow.ItisthedutyoftheFundtoinvest,manageandaccumulatemoneysreceivedforthispurposetoenabletheObjectivetobemetandtoverifythatitisbeingmetorwillbemetfromtimetotimeduringthelifeoftheFundandbyformulatingcertainkeycomponentsoftheprogrammeatthetimeitisfirstsubmittedforapproval.
5.2.4 TheEnergyBillprecludestheSecretaryofStatefromapprovingaFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhichinhisviewdoesnotmakeprudentprovisionforthefullcostsofdecommissioningtherelevantpowerstationandthefullshareofrelatedwastemanagementcosts.TheSecretaryofState
43 MeetingtheEnergyChallenge,AWhitePaperonNuclearPower,URN08/525,January2008.
85
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
wouldnotexpecttoapprovearrangementswhichdidnotattheminimummakeprovisionforaccumulationofsufficientmoneysbymeansofpaymentsintoanindependentFund.
5.2.5 TheGovernmentrecognisesthattheremaybesituationswheretheFundisinsufficienttomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesinfull.Forexample,theliabilitiesmaycrystalliseearlierthanexpectedorcrystallisewhenexpectedbutwheretheFundisinadequatetomeetthecosts(e.g.becauseofare-assessmentinthecostoftheliabilitieswhichhasnotledtoincreasedcontributionscontrarytoparagraph5.5.10).Thisissueisdealtwithinmoredetailbelowinparagraph5.2.6.TheadditionalarrangementsputinplacebyanoperatortodealwithsuchriskswillbeconsideredforapprovalbyreferencetotheGuidingPrinciplessetoutbelowandreferencestotheFundbelowshouldnotbeconstruedasexcludingtheapplicationofthoseprinciplestosuchadditionalarrangements.
Approval criteria: Guiding Principles
5.2.6 Operators’proposalswillbeconsideredonacasebycasebasis.Whenconsideringwhethertoapprove,toapprovewithconditionsorwhethertomodifyaFundingArrangementPlanwhichhasalreadybeenapproved,theSecretaryofStatewillhaveregardtothefollowingGuidingPrinciples:
Independence of Fund●●
Theoperatormustensurethatthearrangementsrelatingtotheaccumulation,managementanddisbursementofmoneysnecessarytodischargeitsliabilitiesareindependentoftheoperatorandoftheGovernment,subjecttotheongoingmonitoringsetoutintheEnergyBillandinthisGuidance.
Independencemeanstheabsenceoftheabilitytocontrolanyaspectofthestructure,governanceoroperationoftheFundonceithasbeenestablished.
Sufficiency of Fund●●
TheoperatormustensurethattheFundisstructured,governedandoperated(includingasregardsthetimingaroundcontributionsandtheinvestmentpolicy)todeliversufficientmoneystodischargeinfulltheoperator’sliabilitiesasandwhentheyfalldue.
Inparticular,anoperatormustsetoutinitsFundingArrangementPlanthemechanismandinstrumentsitwillhaveinplacetoensurethatsufficientmoneysareavailabletopayfortheoperator’sliabilitiesiftheFundisinsufficient(forwhateverreason)toenablethoseliabilitiestobemetinfullontheirduedate.
TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectsuchmechanismstobeputinplacetocoversituationswheretheFundisunder-fundedatthedatethestation
86
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
reachestheendofitsgeneratinglifetimeorprovesinadequatetomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesduringdecommissioning.Suchsituationsmightinclude,forexamplewhere:
thepowerstationhastobeclosedanddecommissionedearlyfor●O
technicalreasons;or
theoperatorbecomesinsolventbeforethestationhasreachedtheend●O
ofitsgeneratinglifetimeandnobuyercanbefoundforthestationwhoiswillingtomeettheoperator’sremainingliabilities;or
insufficientcontributionshavebeenmadetomeetre-assessed●O
decommissioningliabilities,wherethisre-assessmenthascausedanincreaseintheamountoftheliabilitythrough,forexample,timingorcostassumptionchanges;or
insufficientcontributionshavebeenmadeasaconsequenceoflower●O
thananticipatedinvestmentreturnsbeingachieved.
Restrictions on use of Fund assets●●
TheoperatormustensurethatthestructureandgovernanceoftheFundissuchthatneitheritnoranyoneelsemayusemoneysintheFundforanypurposeotherthandecommissioning,wastemanagementandwastedisposalinrelationtothestationtowhichthemoneysrelateevenintheeventofthereorganisation,forexample,oftheoperator,exceptintheeventofanysurplusoncedecommissioninghasbeencompletedandthefixedpriceforwastedisposalhasbeenpaid(seeparagraphs5.9.1–5.9.5).
Insolvency remoteness●●
TheoperatormustensurethattheFundisstructuredsothattheriskofasuccessfulchallengetotheFundintheeventoftheoperator’sinsolvencyortheinsolvencyofabodycorporatewhichisassociatedwiththeoperatorisminimised.
Preventing recourse to public funds●●
Theoperatormustensurethattheprospectoftheoperator’sliabilitieshavingtobemetinwholeorinpartfrompublicfundsisremoteatalltimes.
Transparency●●
TheoperatormustensurethatthearrangementsundertheFundingArrangementPlanaresuchthattheprocessofaccumulating,maintainingandmanagingfundssufficienttodischargetheoperator’sliabilities(distinguishingforthispurposedecommissioningandwastemanagementliabilities,andwastedisposalcosts)istransparentandvisibletotheSecretaryofState,stakeholdersandthewiderpublic.
Inparticulartheremustbetransparencybetween,andseparationandseparatereportingofthetwosetsofliabilitieswhichariseinrelationtodecommissioningandwastemanagementontheonehandandwaste
87
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
disposalontheotheraswellasthemoneysaccumulatedtomeetthecostsofeach.Thereshouldbenoelementorprospectofcross-subsidybetweenthetwo.
Inordertoachievethenecessarytransparencyasbetweenthesetwocategoriesofliabilitiesandthemoneysaccumulatedtomeetthem,anoperatormaydecidetocreatetwoormorefundsratherthanone.ReferencesinthisGuidancetoa“Fund”inthesingularshouldnotbereadasprecludingthispossibilityandanysuchproposalwouldbeconsideredbytheSecretaryofStateonitsmerits.
General
5.2.7 ThisguidancesetsouttheprinciplesthatanoperatorshouldadoptinestablishingaFund.ItisnotintendedtobeundulyprescriptiveastothelegalstructureandadministrativearrangementsfortheFund,nortosetouttherelativeadvantagesanddisadvantagesofpossiblevehicleswhichmaybecapableofdischargingthevariousfunctionsoftheFundtherebyachievingtheObjectiveandsatisfyingtheGuidingPrinciples.
5.2.8 TheremainderofthisguidancefocusesonspecificaspectsoftheFundingArrangementPlan.TheSecretaryofStatewillneedtobeprovidedwiththenecessaryinformationtosatisfyhimselfthatprudentfinancialprovisionhadbeenmadefortheoperator’sliabilities.Thatsaid,theSecretaryofStateisnotawareofanalternativefundingstructuretothatsetoutinparagraph5.2.3abovewhichwouldmeettheObjectiveandtheGuidingPrinciplestothesameextent.
88
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.3FundStructure
5.3.1 InordertogainapprovalforitsFundedDecommissioningProgrammetheoperatorwillbeexpectedtoproposeastructureforanaccumulatingFundwhichmeetsthecostsofdecommissioningandwastemanagementanditsfullshareofwastedisposalcosts,whichbestenablesittomeettheObjectivesetoutinparagraph5.2.2andwhichcomplieswiththeGuidingPrinciples.
5.3.2 Anystructureproposedmustbedemonstrablycapableofaccumulatingsufficientfundstomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesasandwhentheyfalldue.Itmustdeliveratalltimesindependencefromtheoperator,transparencyandrobustnessfromclaimsbytheoperator(forpurposesotherthaninconnectionwiththeObjective)orbytheoperator’screditorsintheeventoftheoperator’sinsolvencyortheinsolvencyofabodycorporatewhichisassociatedwiththeoperator.
5.3.3 AssetoutinguidanceonpreparingaDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan,theoperatorwillberequiredtoestablishrobustestimatesforitsdecommissioningandwastemanagementliabilities.TheGovernmentwillsetafixedunitpriceforthedisposalofhigheractivitywastes.OperatorsmaydecidetocreateasingleFund,orestablishseparateFundsfor(a)theoperator’sdecommissioningand(b)theoperator’swastedisposalcosts.
5.3.4 EachoperatormaysetupasingleFundforeachnewnuclearpowerstationitoperatesorforafleetofnewnuclearpowerstations.Alternatively,anumberofoperatorsmaysetupindividualFundswithinanumbrellaFund.Inallcases,theremustbenoelementorprospectofoneFundbeingusedtomeetliabilitieswhichareproperlytheresponsibilityofanotherFund.Inanyevent,theremustbetransparency,separationandseparatereportingofthetwosetsofliabilities(decommissioningandwastemanagementontheonehandandwastedisposalontheother)andthemoneysavailabletomeetthecostsofeachforeachstation.AnysucharrangementswouldalsohavetomeettheObjectiveandtheGuidingPrinciples.
89
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.3.5 TheSecretaryofStatebelievesthattheObjectivecanbeachievedandtheGuidingPrinciplessatisfiedbyastructurewiththeattributessetoutbelow:
(A) A Fund established in the UK
EstablishingtheFundintheUK(thatistosayensuringitisdomiciledand●●
managedfromtheUK,whichforthispurposedoesnotincludeScotland44)wouldassistinmeetingtheprincipleinrelationtoinsolvencyremoteness.EstablishingtheFundelsewherewouldincreasethisriskbymakingtheFundvulnerabletochangesinlocalinsolvencylawaswellasdeprivingitoftheprotectionwhichtheEnergyBillseekstoconferonitintheeventoftheinsolvencyoftheoperator.Further,sincecertainformsofFundstructure(suchastrusts)arenotwidelyrecognisedincivillawjurisdictions,therearealsorisksthatthesekindsofstructurescouldbere-characterisedandthereforenotbesufficientlyinsolvencyremote.
(B) The Fund
TheFundcouldtakeanumberofformsincludingaspecialpurposevehicle●●
(suchasaprivatecompanylimitedbysharesorguarantee).Inorderforthatvehicletobeconsideredorphanedandsufficientlyremotefromtheoperator,itscreditorsandtheGovernment,thesharesormembershipofthatspecialpurposevehiclecould,forexample,ultimatelybeheldbyaUKtrustwhosetrusteesarewithinthejurisdictionoftheEnergyBill.
ThearrangementsunderwhichtheFundisestablishedshouldsetout●●
measurestoensureitslongevityandcontinuanceofthepurposeforwhichitwasestablishedincludingappropriatechecksandbalancesasregardsthesuccessionofdirectors,membersandtrusteeswithintheFundstructure.
(C) Activities of the Fund
Whilsttheoperatorisultimatelyresponsiblefordischargingitsownliabilities,●●
theFundshouldbeestablishedwiththeprimaryobjectiveofaccumulatingsufficientfundstomeettheseliabilities(andwithsufficientpowerstoachievethisend).
TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectoperatorstodemonstrateinthe●●
FundingArrangementsPlanthattransferstotheFundcouldnotreasonablybeexpectedtobechallengedastransactionsatanundervalueorpreferences(ortheirequivalentinanyotherapplicablejurisdiction).
TheSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpecttoseetheFund’sactivitiesring-●●
fencedfromtheoperatoranditscreditorsandtherebyinsulatedfromliabilitiesandobligationsowedtothirdpartiesbytheoperator.ConstitutionalormanagementrestrictionsapplicabletotheFundwillbeexpectedtoincluderequirementsto:
44 Thebodyresponsibleforinvesting,accumulatingandmanagingmoneysmustbeformedanddomiciledwithinEngland,WalesandNorthernIreland,butsee5.3.5(B)inrelationtothedomicileofatrustwherethisformspartofthestructureoftheFund.
90
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
havealimitedpurposeandactivities;●●
controlchangetothepermittedpurposeandactivities;●●
haveamajorityofdirectorsorotherpersonsinpositionsofauthoritywho●●
areindependentoftheoperatorsuchthattheoperatordoesnothaveeitherdirectorindirectcontrolof,orinfluenceover,theFund;
maintainitsownlegalidentity,independentoftheoperator,including●●
withrespecttomaintenanceofitsownseparatebooks,records,financialstatementsandaccounts;
notguaranteeorotherwisebeobligedforthedebtsofothers;●●
notpledgeitscreditforthebenefitofothers;●●
prohibitorrestricttheFundfromborrowingmoneysorissuingsecurities;●●
notpledge(orprovidesecurityinrespectof)itsassetsotherthantothe●●
Governmentormakeloansoradvances;
nothaveanyemployees;and●●
ensureanyrelationshipwithothersisonbonafide,arm’slengthterms.●●
(D) Ownership of the Fund
TheFundshouldbeindependentoftheoperatorandtheoperator’sgroup.Itshouldbeinsolvencyremoteandanyentitywithintheoverallstructure(includinganywithownership/membershipinterestsintheFund)shoulditselfalsobeestablishedasinsolvencyremote.
(E) Disbursement from the Fund
TheexpectationisthatdisbursementswillbemadefromtheFundupto●●
thevalueoftheassetsoftheFundtomeetrelevantdecommissioningandwastedisposalexpenditurecosts (seeparagraphs5.8.1–5.8.9).
GiventhepurposeoftheFundistoaccumulateandmanagemoneysfor●●
decommissioningandwastemanagementtheFundshouldnotbecapableofmakingdistributions,otherthantofulfilthisobjective,untilthoseliabilitieshavebeendischargedinfull.
AnysurplusintheFundremainingoncedecommissioningandwaste●●
managementactivitiesarecompleteandfullypaidforwillrequiretobedisbursedinaccordancewiththeobjectsorpurposesoftheFund.ThedestinationofthosemoneyswillneedtobeestablishedintheFundingArrangementPlan(seeparagraphs5.9.1–5.9.5).
Fund powers
5.3.6 TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthepowersanddutiesoftheFund(andofthoseresponsibleforrunningitwherethisdistinctionarises)aswellasthepowersanddutiesoftheoperatorwhicharerelevantto
91
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
thepurposeoftheFundingArrangementPlan.Forexample,theFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthepowersanddutiesoftherelevantpartiesinrelationto:
settingtherateof(financial)contributionstobemadebytheoperatortothe●●
Fund;
investing,accumulatingandmanagingFundmoneys;●●
reportingtotheoperatorandtotheSecretaryofStateontheperformanceof●●
theFund(seeparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16);and
disbursementofmoneys(seeparagraph5.8.1–5.8.9).●●
5.3.7 TheproposedFundstructureshouldenabletheobligationsandrestrictionsonitaswellasitspowersanddutiesinrelationtotheoperatortobesetoutinitsconstitutionaldocumentation,inamannersuchthattheseaspectscannotberevised,exceptwiththeapprovaloftheSecretaryofStatethroughthesubmissionofarevisedFundingArrangementPlan.
5.3.8 TheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewillbelegallybindingontheoperatorinthatfailurebytheoperatortocomplywithitwillbeacriminaloffence.However,elementsoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemaybereinforcedthroughcontractualagreementsbetweeninterestedparties,forexampleinrelationtowastedisposal.
92
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.4FundGovernance
5.4.1 TheSecretaryofStatewillwishtobesatisfiedthatsuitablearrangementsareinplaceforthegovernanceoftheFund.ThisincludesnotonlysucharrangementsfortheFunditself(i.e.thebodyresponsibleforinvesting,accumulatingandmanagingmoneysreceived)butalsoforanyentity(suchasatrust)withownership/membershipinterestsin,orcontrolof,theFund.
5.4.2 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoseethefollowingelementsincludedintheconstitutionalarrangementsorstructureoftheFundasregardsthoseresponsibleforthemanagementoftheFund:
acleardelineationofduties;●●
appropriaterestrictionsonpowers;and●●
provisionstoensurethattheyactwiththeappropriatelevelofskillandcare●●
intheperformanceoftheirfunctions.
5.4.3 Thegovernancearrangementswilldependonthefundstructureadopted.GovernanceoftheFundshould,however,bebythosewhoarecompetenttogovern,themajorityofwhommustbeindependentoftheoperator.GovernanceoftheFundisalsotobeindependentoftheGovernment.TheSecretaryofStatewouldthereforenotexpecttohaveanyroleintheappointmentprocessofthoseresponsibleforFundgovernancebeyondbeingsatisfiedthatboththeappointmentcriteriaandthecontinuingobligationsofthoseresponsibleforFundgovernance(whichoperatorsshouldincludeintheFundingArrangementPlan)delivertheexpectedlevelofindependenceandcompetence.
5.4.4 Theoperatormustnothaveeitherdirectorindirectcontrolof,orinfluenceover,theFund.TheSecretaryofStateisthereforeunlikelytobesatisfiedbyfundingarrangementswhichleavecontroloftheFundinthehandsoftheoperatororamajorityofpersonswhoarenotindependentoftheoperator.Iftheoperatorappointsnon-independentpersonstoagovernancerole,thentheymustbeinaminorityandtheirresponsibilitiesmustbeowedtotheFundregardlessofanyotherpositionthattheymayhold.
5.4.5 Independencecanbedemonstratedinanumberofways.Inallcases,thosepersonsappointedtoagovernancerole(withtheexceptionofthoseappointedinanon-independentroleinaccordancewithparagraph5.4.4)wouldbeexpectedtoaffirmtheirindependencebeforeacceptingthatappointment,andshouldbesubjecttoarequirementtomaintaintheirindependenceforthedurationoftheappointment.Thiswillincluderequiringthosepersonstoavoidanysituationinwhichthatpersonhas,orcouldhave,adirectorindirectinterestthatconflicts,orpossiblymayconflict,withhisdutiestotheFundinamannerconsistentwiththedutiesapplicabletodirectorsofanyEnglish
93
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
company.Inthecaseofindividuals,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheindividualtobeindependentoftheoperatoraccordingtoprinciplesatleastasstringentasthosesetoutinPrincipleA.3.1oftheCombinedCodeonCorporateGovernance45.Withoutprejudicetotheforegoing,neitheranindividual(togetherwithhiscloserelativesandfamilytrusts)noracorporatebody(togetherwithitsassociates)shouldhold(directlyorindirectly)anyinvestmentintheoperatororanyofitsassociatedcompanieswhichgivesrise,orcouldbeperceivedtogiverise,toanactualorpotentialconflictofinterest.
5.4.6 Competencecanalsobedemonstratedinanumberofways.Inthecaseofindividuals,theindividualshouldbeademonstrablyfitandproperpersonwiththenecessaryeducation,experienceandskillstoholdtheposition.InthecaseoftheappointmentofacorporatebodytogoverntheFund,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthattheoperatorcoulddemonstratethatthecorporatebodyhastherequisitelevelofexperienceandresources(includingindividualswhocoulddemonstratethesamequalitiesdescribedabove)tomanagetherole.
45 CombinedCodeonCorporateGovernance,July2003.
94
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.5TargetvaluefortheFundandcontributionstotheFund
Target value for the Fund
5.5.1 TheoperatorwillberesponsibleformakinggoodanyshortfallorriskofshortfallintheaccumulatedmoneysheldbytheFund.
5.5.2 Fordecommissioningliabilities,tominimisetheriskthatthefundsaccumulatedareinsufficient,theFundwillbeexpected,basedonrobustassumptions,toaccumulateatleast100percentoftheinflation,riskanduncertaintyadjustedvalueoftheoperator’spredicteddecommissioningliabilities.TheSecretaryofStatewillexpectanassessmentofanappropriateriskbasedcontingencytobeincludedinthetargetFundvaluewhichtheFundwouldbeexpectedtoreassessregularly.IncludingsuchacontingencyinthetargetamountfortheFundwillmitigateagainstincreasesinthecostsoftheoperator’sliabilitiessetoutintheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanand/orinstanceswheretheFunddoesnotachievetheanticipatedgrowthonitsinvestments.
5.5.3 ThetargetamountfortheFundtomeetthecostsofwastedisposalwillbebasedonthefixedunitpricesetbytheGovernmentandtheagreedscheduleaccordingtowhichpaymentstotheGovernmentmustbemade.Similarly,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpectacontingencytobeincludedinthetargetvalueoftheFundaccruingtomeetthefixedunitpriceforwastedisposal,tomitigateagainstFundinvestmentreturnsbeinglessthananticipated.
5.5.4 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthefirstpaymenttobemadetotheFundfromtheoutsetofgenerationofelectricity.
5.5.5 TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetouttheoperator’sproposalstoensurethatinreasonabletimebeforethedateonwhichthestationisexpectedtoceaseelectricitygeneration,therearemoneysintheFundwhich,havingregardtotheexpectedinvestmentperformanceoftheFund,willbesufficienttomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesasandwhentheyfalldue.
95
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Contributions to the Fund
5.5.6 PaymentstotheFundshouldbeviewedasanessentialelementofoperationwhichmustbeservicedbeforedebt.
5.5.7 TosatisfytheSecretaryofStatethattheoperatorwillbecapableofmeetingtheObjective,theFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthelevelofandscheduleforcontributionswhichtheoperatorwillmaketotheFundandthebasisonwhichmodificationstothecontributionschedulewillbedeterminedthroughthegeneratinglifetimeofthestation.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheFund(ratherthantheoperator)tosetthecontributionschedulewithintheapprovedinvestmentpolicydrawnupbytheoperator.
5.5.8 OperatorswillneedtoexplainthattheircontributionstotheFundaremadeinconsiderationofpotentialtaxliabilitiesthatwillbeleviedontheoperatorandtheFund.Inconsideringthetaxtreatment,itisrecommendedthatoperatorsconsidertheVATtreatmentofpaymentsbothintoandoutoftheFundaswellastheVATtreatmentofdecommissioningcostsandwhetheroutputVATisrecoverable.Fromacorporatetaxperspective,operatorsshouldconsiderthecorporateorincometaxtreatmentofthereceipts,paymentsandinvestmentincomeoftheFundandoperator.
5.5.9 ItwillalsobenecessaryforoperatorstoexplaintherationalefortheproposedFundinvestmentpolicyandhencetheassumptionsthathavebeenmadeaboutreturnsoninvestmentsmadebytheFund(seeparagraphs5.7.1–5.7.6).
5.5.10TheobligationtocontributetotheFundmustbelegallybindingontheoperatorandenforceablebythosewithresponsibilityfordischargingthefunctionoftheFund.TheFundingArrangementPlanmustsetouttheremedialstepstobetakeniftheFundbecomes,orisatriskofbecoming,under-fundedatanystage.TheFundingArrangementPlanmustalsosetoutthepowersthattheFundwouldhaveinthesecircumstancesandtheadditionaldutiesthatwouldariseontheoperator(seeparagraphs5.11.1–5.11.4).
5.5.11IntheFundingArrangementPlan,theoperatorshouldmakeproposalsforthelimitedcircumstancesinwhichcontributionstotheFundmaybereviseddownwards.ThesecircumstancesmayincludewheretheFund’sgrowthhasoutperformedexpectationsandtheactuariallyassessedvalueoftheFundissignificantlygreaterthanitstargetvalueatthatpointintimeandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundconsiderthatareductioninthecontributionratewouldnotbeimprudent.ItisnotexpectedthattheSecretaryofStatewouldagreetoarevisiondownwardsofcontributionstotheFund(whichislikelytoamounttoamodificationwhichwouldrequirehisapprovalunderclause46oftheEnergyBill)underanycircumstancesinthefirsttenorlastfiveyearsofanewnuclearpowerstation’sgeneratinglife.
96
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.5.12Oncealltheoperator’sliabilitiesrelatingtodecommissioningandwastemanagementandwastedisposalhavebeenfullydischarged,anysurplusmoneysheldbytheFundmustbedisbursedinaccordancewiththeobjectsorpurposesoftheFundwhichmaymeantheyarereturnedtotheoperator(seeparagraphs5.9.1–5.9.5).
5.5.13TheSecretaryofStateanticipatesthepreparation,revisionandapprovalofFundingArrangementPlansmaybeamulti-stageprocessinwhichoperatorswillhavetosatisfyhim46onanumberofconstituentpartsofaFundedDecommissioningProgrammeconsecutively.Itwillbeclearfromwhatissetoutabovethattheinvestmentpolicy(forexample)referredtoinparagraphs5.7.1–5.7.6,wouldneedtobedrawnupbytheoperatorbeforethecontributionschedulecouldbeformulated.Equally,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheoperatortobeabletodemonstratetohissatisfactionthatthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwerecontentwiththearrangementssetoutintheFundingArrangementPlanbytheoperatorpriortohisdecidingwhethertoapproveitornot.Hewouldthereforeexpectthesepersonstobeidentifiedorappointedbeforeproposalsontheinvestmentstrategyandcontributionschedulearemade.TheSecretaryofStatewillexpectoperatorstomakeproposalsastohowfarinadvanceofthecommencementofelectricitygenerationthosepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillneedtobeappointedoridentified.ClearlyanychangestotheprogrammeinthelightofcommentsfromtheseappointeeswillneedtobeapprovedbytheSecretaryofState.
Contribution Disputes
5.5.14TheSecretaryofStateconsidersitimportantthattherelationshipbetweentheoperatorandtheFundrecognisesthatitistheFundthatshouldhavetherighttosetthecontributionschedulebasedupontheinvestmentpoliciesputforwardbytheoperatorapprovedintheFundingArrangementPlan.Notwithstandingthis,theSecretaryofStaterecognisesthepossibilityofdisputesarisingbetweentheoperatorandtheFundonothermatters,particularlygiventhenatureoftheliabilitiesandcostsinvolvedandthelengthoftimebeforethoseliabilitiesareexpectedtocrystallise.
5.5.15TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldthereforeincludeafullyscopeddisputeresolutionproceduretofacilitatethetimelyandcost-effectiveresolutionofdisputesbetweenpersonswithobligationsundertheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeinrespectofthosematters.
5.5.16Whateverform(orforms)ofdisputeresolutionarechosentheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeshouldmakeclearwhethertheprocedureandoutcomeisbinding;thescopeoftheprocedure(i.e.thedisputestowhichitrelatesifitdoesnotrelatetoalldisputes);andthetimescaleswithinwhichtherelevantstepshavetobetakenbytheparties.
46 TheSecretaryofStatewillcallontheadviceoftheNuclearLiabilitiesFinancingAssuranceBoard(NLFAB)inassessingtheconstituentpartsofaFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
97
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.6Reviewandreporting
5.6.1 Theoperatorwillbeexpectedtocalculateitsownestimatesofthecostsofmeetingitsdecommissioningliabilities.ThepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtosatisfythemselvesasto:
theaccuracyoftheoperator’sestimatesofthecostsofmeetingits●●
decommissioningliabilities;and
thecontributionsandinvestmentreturnsnecessarytoaccumulateaFund●●
sufficienttosatisfyboththedecommissioningliabilitiesandthewastedisposalliabilitiesasandwhentheyarise.
records
5.6.2 TheoperatormustdemonstratetotheSecretaryofStatethat,aspartofitsbasicrecordkeepingstructure,itwillmaintainanaccuraterecordofthedesignof,atleast,thenuclearisland(s)andsuchrecordshouldbecontinuouslyupdatedtoreflecttechnicalandoperationalchangesto,atleast,thenuclearisland(s).ThepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundmustbesatisfiedwiththesearrangements.
5.6.3 Thissystemshoulddrawon“configurationcontrol”modelsfrom,forexample,processindustriesandtheaeronauticalsectors,andwillsupplementexistingrecordkeepingpracticesundercurrentrequirements.Theobjectiveof“configurationcontrol”istomanagetheevolutionoftheapproveddesignof,atleast,thenuclearisland(s)throughasystemicchangemanagementprocessandtheimplementationofoperationalandtechnicalchangestoensureaccuracyandconsistencybetweentherecordsand,atleast,thenuclearisland(s).
5.6.4 Suchasystemwillassistanoperatorinensuringithasinplacecomprehensive,transparentandeffectivearrangementsforassessinghowproposedoperationalandtechnicalchangesto,atleast,thenuclearisland(s)willimpacttheFundedDecommissioningProgrammebeforetheoperationalandtechnicalchangesaremade.
5.6.5 Theoperatorwillalsoberequiredtokeepandmakeavailableadetailedscheduleoftheanticipatedandactualwastearisings.
98
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Annual report and Quinquennial report
5.6.6 TheoperatorwillbeexpectedtocarryoutbothannualandquinquennialreviewsoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammereportsofwhichshouldbesubmittedtotheSecretaryofStateandpublished.ThereviewsshouldbecarriedoutwiththeaimofensuringthattheObjectivemaybeachieved,namelythattheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan,includingcostestimates,remainsaccurateanduptodateandreflectsthecurrentstateoftheplanttowhichitrelates;andthatthefundingarrangementsremaincapableofyieldingsufficientfundstomeetthedecommissioningliabilitiesandwastedisposalliabilitiesasandwhenthosefundsareneeded.
5.6.7 SetoutinAnnexAaredetailsofwhattheSecretaryofStatewouldconsidertobeanappropriateandpracticablemeansfortherelevantpersonstosatisfythemselvesthattheObjectivewasmet(atallmaterialtimes)throughanannualandquinquennialreportingstructure.TheSecretaryofStatewouldassesstheoperator’sproposalsforanannualandquinquennialreportingstructureonacaseonbycasebasiswithreferencetotheGuidingPrinciplesandinthelightoftheproceduresetoutinAnnexA.
5.6.8 Inanyevent,thepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtotakeadvicefromsuitablyqualifiedexpertsoperatingunderappropriatelevelsofprofessionalindemnitycoverinreviewingtheoperator’sannualandquinquennialreportandinrelationtothereviewoftheFund.
5.6.9 TheNLFABwillprovideon-goingadvicetotheSecretaryofStateinconnectionwithallfundingarrangementsandmaybecalledupontoreviewsomeoralloftheinformationprovidedtotheSecretaryofStatebytheoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFund.
5.6.10TheSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpecttheannualandquinquennialreportstobepublished.OperatorsshouldsetoutintheirFundingArrangementPlantheirproposalsregardingpublication.TheGovernmentwillhaveregardtojustifiablesensitivitiesinrelationtoconfidentialityandtheextentofmaterialtobeplacedinthepublicdomainwhenconsideringoperators’proposalsregardingpublishingreports.
5.6.11Duringthedecommissioningphase,theoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtoprovideannualreportsasoutlinedinparagraph5.8.5below.
Approval of material changes
5.6.12AllmodificationstoanapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgramme(otherthanthosetowhichregulationsmadeunderclause46oftheEnergyBillapply)requireapprovalbytheSecretaryofState.If,atanytime,aneventoccurswhichrequiresachangetobemadetotheFundedDecommissioningProgramme,subjecttoanymaterialitythresholdtobesetoutinregulations,
99
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
theSecretaryofStatewillexpecttheoperatorand/orthosepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtopromptlynotifyhimofthatevent,providedetailsoftheeffectontheoperator’sliabilitiesofsuchaneventandthefinancialconsequencesofsuchachangeontheFundedDecommissioningProgramme,and,proposeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofStateamodificationtotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetotakeaccountofthateventinaccordancewiththeprocedurelaiddowninclauses44and45oftheEnergyBill(seeparagraphs3.22–3.33).
5.6.13Ontheannualreview,wherethecumulativeeffectofoperationalortechnicaloranyotherchangesonthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofthewastedisposalliabilitiesinthepreviousyearisaboveamaterialitythresholdwhichwewouldexpecttobesetoutinregulations,thentheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtoproposeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofStateanymodificationtotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammenecessarytoupdatetheprogrammetotakeintoaccountthesechanges.
information
5.6.14Inadditiontotheinformationwhichheexpectstoreceiveassetoutabove,underclause49oftheEnergyBilltheSecretaryofStatehasthepowertoobtaininformationfromtheoperator,thepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundorotherpersonswithobligationsundertheFundedDecommissioningProgramme(forexample,bodiescorporateassociatedwiththeoperatorwhichhaveobligationsundertheprogramme).Underclause49(3)oftheBilltheSecretaryofStatemayonlyobtaininformationforthepurposeofenablinghimtodetermine:
whethertheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisbeingcompliedwith;●●
whetheritwillbepossibleforobligationsundertheFunded●●
DecommissioningProgrammearisingatafuturedatetobecompliedwith;
whethertheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemakesprudent●●
provisioninrelationtothematterssetoutintheDWMPandtheFundingArrangementPlan.
5.6.15TheSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpectthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtohaveappropriaterightstorequestandreceiveinformationfromtheoperator.
notification
5.6.16Inadditiontothenotificationrequirementsetoutinparagraph5.6.12,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheFundingArrangementPlantoprovideappropriateprocedurestoensurethattheoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundreporttotheSecretaryofStateimmediately
100
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
onorpriortotheoccurrenceofanyofthefollowingevents(whetherornottheyresultinabreachoftheprogramme):
Changeofcontrolorownershipoftheoperator(seeparagraphs5.12.1–●●
5.12.9);
Changetothecontributionschedule;●●
Changeinthecreditratingofanoperator,oranyentityprovidingaguarantee●●
orothercreditsupportundertheFundedDecommissioningProgramme(seeparagraphs5.10.1–5.10.7);
Unplannedclosureoftheplant;●●
Changeintheinvestmentproposalorachangeofstrategy.●●
101
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.7Investmentpolicy
5.7.1 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheFundingArrangementPlantoincludeaStatementofInvestmentPrinciples(“SIP”)whichsetsouttheFund’sinvestmentpolicy,designedtoensurethemoneyswhichtheFundreceivesfromtheoperatorwillbeappropriatelyinvestedtogeneratethesumsnecessarytomeettheoperator’sliabilitieswhentheyfalldue.Asaminimum,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheSIPtoincludetheFund’s:
investmentobjectives;●●
attitudetoriskandhowriskisdefined,measured,mitigatedandmonitored;●●
assetallocationstrategy,includingpermittedandprohibitedassettypesand●●
projectedinvestmentreturnsoneachassetclass.TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthebasisfortheassetallocationstrategyandincludeaneconomicand/orstatisticaljustificationfortheprojectedinvestmentreturns;theinvestmentstrategyshouldsetoutlimitstoportfolioconcentrationineachassetclassandinanyindividualinvestments;
decision-makingauthorities,processesandproceduresregardinginvestment●●
decisions;
performancemeasurementcriteriaandbenchmarks;●●
policyonrealisinginvestments;●●
policyonexercisingrights(includingvotingrights)attachedtoinvestments;●●
policyontheextenttowhichsocial,environmentalorethicalconsiderations●●
aretakenintoaccountininvestmentdecisions;
mandatestoalladvisersandmanagersandassociatedfeeandliability●●
structures;and
reportingrequirements.●●
5.7.2 TheFundmustrecogniseandaddresstherisksassociatedwithitsinvestmentstrategy,including:
thelikelihoodofthestrategyunderperformingthetargetreturnbymorethan●●
5%inany3yearperiod;
theriskoffailingtomeetitsoverallobjectives;●●
sponsorcovenantrisk/countryrisk;●●
operatorcovenantrisk;●●
riskofinadequatediversificationorinappropriateinvestment(concentration●●
risk);
issuerrisk;●●
102
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
currencyandinterestraterisk;●●
liquidityrisk;●●
inflationrisk;●●
custodianrisk;and●●
organisationalriskofthemanagersandadvisers.●●
5.7.3 Inmakinginvestmentdecisions,theFundshouldactprudentlyhavingobtainedappropriateprofessionaladviceandwithdueregardtotheSIP.TheFundwillnotberestrictedfromdelegatinginvestmentdecisionstothosewiththeskills,informationandresourcestotakethemeffectively,butwillremainresponsibleforthedecisionstakenbyanydelegatedparty.
5.7.4 TheFundshouldtakeaccountofthesuitabilityofinvestmentshavingregardto:
thenatureoftheoperator’sfutureliabilities(especiallytheinfluenceof●●
inflation);
theexpectedduedatefordisbursementsbytheFund;●●
thefactthattheoperator’sliabilitiesareexpectedtobeinSterling;●●
thecertaintyofexpectedfuturedisbursementsfromtheFund;and●●
thefrequencyandlevelofcontributionstotheFund.●●
5.7.5 TheFundshouldreviewtheSIPonaregularbasisand,inthelightofchangingcircumstances,toensurethecontinuedappropriatenessoftheinvestmentarrangements.ChangestotheSIParelikelytoamounttoamodificationwhichwillrequireapprovalbytheSecretaryofStateunderclause45oftheEnergyBill.
5.7.6 ItisexpectedthattheSIPwillalso:
ensurethattheFundinvestmentstrategyisappropriatelydiversifiedto●●
reduceinvestmentriskandthattothisend,awidevarietyofassetclassesmaybeconsideredincludingnon-traditionalassetclasses;
definetherestrictedcircumstancesandthelimitedextenttowhichtheFund●●
mayinvestintheoperatorandtheprohibitionofcertaintypesofoperator-relatedinvestments;and
specifythattheinvestmentstrategyincludesagradualreductionin●●
investmentriskastheendofthegeneratinglifeofthestationapproaches.
103
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.8Payment/disbursementpolicy
Decommissioning and Waste Management liabilities
5.8.1 Evenwithacontingencyforriskanduncertaintybuiltin,itisimportantthatappropriategovernanceisexercisedbytheFundarounddisbursementsfromtheFund.TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthedisbursementpolicyfortheFundtofinancetheoperator’sdecommissioningandwastemanagementliabilitiesincluding:
thegovernancearrangementsunderwhichmoneyswouldbedisbursedby●●
theFundinlinewiththeapprovedDWMP;
thepersonstowhompaymentwillbemade;and●●
themechanismformakingpayments.●●
5.8.2 TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldaddresswhenmoneysmaybedisbursedandagainstwhatmilestones.AdequatesafeguardsmustbeinplacetoensurethatmoneysarespentonlyoncostsforwhichtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammemakesprovisionandwhichshouldbeauditableandcertifiedaspayablebyreferencetotheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
5.8.3 TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetouttheFund’sgovernancearrangementsforoverseeingthedisbursementoffunds.TheFundwillbeexpectedtoreviewprogressagainsttheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanonanannualbasisandtotheextentthatashortfallinfundingisanticipated,theoperatorwillbeexpectedtofundthedeficit.
5.8.4 TheoperatorwouldbeexpectedtodemonstratetothepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundthatithasappropriateproceduresinplaceforcheckingthatmoneysreceivedfromtheFundarebeingappliedagainstallowableDWMPcostsandthatmilestonesforachievingtheDWMParebeingmet.AnexampleofsuchaprocedurewouldbeaninternalauditoftheuseofmoneysfromtheFundagainstmilestones.
5.8.5 Attheendoftheyear,theoperatorshouldprovideanannualreporttothepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundsettingoutdifferencesbetweenthepaymentsfromtheFundandthereductionintheoperator’sliabilities.Whereanoperator’sexpendituredoesnotreducetheoperator’sliabilitiesbytherequiredamount,theannualreportshouldsetouthowtheoperatorintendstomitigatethisuseofadditionalfundingandshouldpropose,ifappropriate,amodificationtotheDWMP.
104
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.8.6 TheSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpectthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtoreviewtheannualreportprovidedbytheoperatorandtoprepareanannualreportonwhethertheFundissufficienttomeettheexpectedcostsoftheDWMP,andtosetoutremedialstepstobetakenifnot.
long term waste disposal
5.8.7 AssetoutintheguidanceontheDWMP(seesection4),theGovernmentwouldexpecttosetafixedunitpricebasedontheoperator’sprojectedfullshareofwastedisposalcostsatthetimewhentheapprovalsforthestationaregiven,priortoconstructionofthestation.WeexpectthatthemoneystocoverthefixedunitpriceforthewastedisposalservicewillbepaidtotheGovernmentastitletoandliabilityforeachoperator’swasteistransferredtotheGovernment.However,weareconsideringwhethertheremaybeacaseforsomeofthisamounttobepaidtotheGovernmentduringthepowerstation’sgeneratinglife.IftheGovernmentdeterminesthatthiswouldbenecessary,wewouldagreeascheduleofpaymentsoutoftheFundwitheachoperatoratthesametimeastheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisapproved.ThiswouldensurethatoperatorsareabletodesigntheirFundandinvestmentpoliciessothatearlypaymentscanbemadeoutoftheFundduringthegeneratinglifeofthestationwhilstalsoensuringthattheFund,takingintoaccountanticipatedgrowth,willreachthetargetamount(adjustedtoreflecttheinterimpaymentsmadeinrelationtowastedisposal).
5.8.8 Ifgeologicaldisposalfacilitiesarenotavailablebythedatesagreedintheschedule,theGovernmentwouldexpecttotaketitletoandliabilityforthewasteaccordingtotheagreedscheduleandwouldexpecttocontinuestoringitonthesitewhereithashithertobeenstoreduntildisposalfacilitiesareavailable.ThecostsofmaintainingtheinterimstoresduringthisperiodwouldbemetbytheGovernmentbutwillhavebeenfactoredintotheriskpremiumaddedtothefixedunitpricetocovertheriskthatconstructionofdisposalfacilitieswillnotbecompleteasrequiredbytheagreedschedule.
Change in ownership or control of the nuclear power station operator
5.8.9 Guidancecoveringachangeinownershiporcontroloftheoperatororthesiteissetoutinparagraphs5.12.1–5.12.9.TheFundingArrangementPlanmustberobustagainstanysuchchangeand,inparticular,mustsetoutsafeguardstoensurethatmoniesarenotimproperlydisbursedbytheFundinthisevent.
105
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.9WindinguptheFund
5.9.1 OperatorswillberequiredtosetoutwhenandbywhatmeanstheFundwillbewoundup.TheFundshouldbewounduponlywhen:
allliabilitieswhichitwasestablishedtosatisfyhavebeenfullypaidand●●
dischargedorifalternativearrangements,whichareacceptabletotheregulatorsandtheSecretaryofState,tomeetthoseliabilitieshavebeenputinplace;and
anysurplusmoneyshavebeendisbursedassetoutbelow.●●
5.9.2 AnysurplusintheFundremainingoncedecommissioningandwastemanagementandwastedisposalactivitiesarecompleteandpaidforwillrequiretobedisbursedinaccordancewiththeobjectsorpurposesoftheFund.TheGovernmentwillnotexpectanysurplusintheFundtobepaidtotheGovernment.
5.9.3 DependingonthestructureoftheFund,itisexpectedthatanysurplusmoneysheldbytheFundinrespectofdecommissioningliabilitiesmaybereturnedtotheoperatoroncedecommissioningiscompleteandallliabilitiesinrespectofdecommissioningandwastemanagementhavebeendischarged.
5.9.4 Operatorswillpayafixedunitpriceforwastedisposal.TheGovernmentwillbepaidthefullfixedunitpriceandanyshortfallintheFundmustbemadegoodbyoperators.Shouldtheactualcostsofprovidingtheserviceprovelowerthanexpected,theselowercostswillnotbepassedontonuclearoperators,whowouldhavegainedfromcertaintyofafixedpriceandwouldnothavebeenexposedtotheriskofpriceescalation.IfthemoneyssetasideintheFundforwastedisposalexceedthisfixedunitprice,GovernmentwillnotexpectthissurplustobepaidtoGovernment.ThesurplusmaybedisbursedinaccordancewiththeobjectsorpurposesoftheFund,whichmayincludebeingreturnedtotheoperatorafterthepaymentstotheGovernmenthavebeenmadeinfull.
5.9.5 Assetoutinparagraphs5.5.1–5.5.6,anyshortfallintheFundmustbemadegoodbytheoperator.
106
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.10 Protection against an insufficient Fund
5.10.1 As noted above, under the existing law, an operator is responsible for all the decommissioning liabilities, waste management liabilities and waste disposal liabilities that arise from the operation of new nuclear power stations. Each operator must ensure that its Funding Arrangement Plan is robust against change, including, for example, any change in regulatory requirements.
5.10.2 Thus, if (for example):
●● the site has to be decommissioned earlier than expected (including as a result of operator insolvency) and there is a shortfall in the accumulated Fund; or
●● during decommissioning the Fund proves inadequate to meet the operator’s decommissioning costs,
the operator is responsible for ensuring that additional funds are available to discharge those liabilities.
5.10.3 Under the provisions of the Energy Bill, the Secretary of State may impose obligations which arise out of the Funded Decommissioning Programme on persons associated with the operator (such as a parent company) including in a case where the operator fails to comply with its funding obligations under the programme. Furthermore, the Energy Bill provides that the obligations on an operator (or former operator) under a Funded Decommissioning Programme remain until the Secretary of State explicitly releases the operator from its obligations, even if it no longer holds a site licence. The Secretary of State would expect to use these powers with the aim of addressing the risks referred to above, for example, in a case where the operator was a member of a group of companies or a joint venture company and it alone was not capable of addressing these risks to the Secretary of State’s satisfaction.
5.10.4 In addition, each operator must satisfy the Secretary of State that effective and transparent arrangements are in place no later than day one of generation as part of the approved Funded Decommissioning Programme to ensure that the operator will meet its obligations to discharge its liabilities in full. In the Funding Arrangement Plan an operator must set out how it will manage and mitigate the risk that there are insufficient funds. An operator’s proposals will be assessed by the Secretary of State on a case by case basis, by reference to the Guiding Principles and the objective, to ensure that the risk of any recourse to public funds whatsoever remains remote at all times.
107
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.10.5 An upfront endowment to the Fund no later than day one of generation together with a provision to front load contributions to the Fund during the earlier years of the power station’s generating life may be an acceptable form of security against such risks where it was one amongst several elements of a proposal in this regard and provided it is structured on appropriate terms.
5.10.6 Alternative forms of security, such as insurance or financial instruments (from an appropriate financial institution) may be acceptable to the Secretary of State to make up a shortfall in the moneys held by a Fund. To the extent that products are not presently available in the market, the Secretary of State would expect operators to work with the financial and insurance industry to develop suitable protections.
5.10.7 Parent company guarantees, on their own, may not be an acceptable form of security as protection against an insufficient fund. The Secretary of State would expect to find a parent company guarantee acceptable where it was one amongst several elements of a proposal in this regard and where as a minimum, the parent company had an acceptable credit rating at the time the programme was first approved; arrangements are in place to monitor the credit worthiness of the parent company; and if the parent company’s credit rating should fall to an unacceptable level, the operator must immediately notify the Secretary of State and ensure supplemental arrangements, which are acceptable to the Secretary of State, are in place.
108
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.11Proposalsforremedialaction
5.11.1Theoperatorisunderadutyunderexistinglawtomeetalltheoperator’sliabilities,whichflowfromoperationofanewnuclearpowerstation(seeparagraph5.10.1).InadditiontotheregulatorysanctionsprovidedforinChapter1ofPart3oftheEnergyBillandinordertolimittheprospectofdisputebetweentheoperatorandtheFund,theSecretaryofStatewouldencouragetheoperatortosetoutinitsFundingArrangementPlanwhatstepsthatitwilltaketomakegoodbreachesoftheFAP(wheretheyarecapableofremedy)andwhat,ifany,stepspersonsresponsiblefortheFundmightalsotakeinsuchcircumstances.
5.11.2Forexample,theFundingArrangementPlanmightsetoutthestepswhichtheoperatorwouldtaketomakegood(perhapsuptoaspecifiedvalueoroveraspecifiedperiodoftime)contributionstotheFundwhichithadfailedtomake,orwhatsecuritytheoperatorwouldarrangetobeputinplacewheretheoriginalsecurityhadlapsedorwasnolongeravailable.
5.11.3TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoseesetouttheroleofpersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundinsuchcircumstances,andthepowersandresponsibilitiesthattheywouldhaveinordertoachievesuchoutcomes.TheFundingArrangementPlanshouldmakeplainhowmuchnoticewouldberequiredtobegivenbyeachparty(inwhatform)andthetimeframeswithinwhichactionwouldberequiredtobetaken.TheSecretaryofStatewouldnotexpecttoapproveproposalsforremedialactionunlesssuchactionwasrequiredtobetakenverypromptlysoastopreventdriftinasituationwhereabreachhadoccurred.
5.11.4NoneoftheseprovisionswouldrelievethedutyontheoperatortoinformtheSecretaryofStateofitsbreach.ProvidedtheproposalswereacceptabletotheSecretaryofStateandwereadheredto,theSecretaryofStatewouldtakeintoaccounttheextenttowhichtheremedialactionproposalswereadheredtowhendeterminingwhat,ifany,enforcementactiontotakeinrelationtosuchabreach.
109
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.12Changeinownershiporcontroloftheoperatororsite
5.12.1TheEnergyBillgivestheSecretaryofStatepowerstoimposeobligationsundertheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeonbodiescorporatewhichareassociatedwiththeoperator,forexampleparentcompaniesorsistercompanies,inordertoensurethatprudentprovisionismadeforthefinancingofdecommissioningandcleanup.
5.12.2TheFundingArrangementPlanmustsetouttheconsequencesofachangeincontroloftheoperatororsiteandthestepstobetakentoinformtheSecretaryofStateandgivehimtheopportunitytoapprove,approvesubjecttomodificationsorconditionsortorejectanychangestotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeingoodtimepriortosuchachangeofcontroloccurring.
5.12.3Wheretheparentconcernedissubjecttoobligationsundertheprogramme,theFundingArrangementPlanshouldrequiretheoperatortore-submititsFundingArrangementPlanforapproval.Wheretheparentisnotundersuchobligations,itsFundingArrangementPlanneedonlyrequiretheoperatortore-submititsFundingArrangementPlanforapprovalwheretheSecretaryofStaterequiresittodosoinpractice.Incertaincircumstances,inparticularwherethechangeofcontrolleadstochangestotheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheFundingArrangementPlantoimposeanobligationontheoperatortore-submittheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeasawholeforapproval.
5.12.4Sofarassistercompaniesareconcerned(i.e.whereasaresultofatransactiontheywillceasetobeassociatedwiththeoperator)wheretheyaresubjecttoobligationsundertheprogramme,theFundingArrangementPlanshouldmakesimilarprovisionasforparentcompaniessubjecttoanobligation.WherethesistercompanyisnotsubjecttoobligationsundertheprogrammetheSecretaryofStatewouldnotexpecttheFundingArrangementPlantorequiretheoperatortoinformhimabouttheproposedchangesnortomakeprovisionforre-submissionoftheFundingArrangementPlanortheprogrammeasawhole.Where(ineithercase)thecessationoftherelationshipwiththeoperatorleadstochangestotheDWMP,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheFAPtoimposeanobligationontheoperatortore-submittheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeasawholeforapproval.
5.12.5BreachofanobligationintheFundingArrangementPlantonotifytheSecretaryofStateofthechangeortosubmittherelevantpartsofthe
110
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
programme(orthewholeoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhereappropriate)forapprovalwould(unlessthedefenceinclause53(2)oftheEnergyBillapplies)amounttoacriminaloffenceunderclause53oftheEnergyBill,whichispunishablewithafineorimprisonmentorfollowingconvictiononindictment,both.Wheretheoffencewascommittedwiththeconsentorconnivanceof,orwasattributabletoneglectonthepartofanofficeroftheoperator,thatofficer(aswellastheoperatoritself)isliabletocriminalprosecutionandsubjecttothesamepenaltiesastheoperator.
5.12.6BeforeapprovingtheFundingArrangementPlan(ortheFundedDecommissioningProgramme,asthecasemaybe),theSecretaryofStatewillexpectconfirmationfromtheFundthatitissatisfiedthattheproposedrevisedfundingarrangements,ifany,willcomplywiththeObjective.Forthispurpose,documentssubmittedinsupportoftheFundingArrangementPlanshouldsetoutthematterstowhichtheFundwouldhaveregardincomingtothatdecision.TheSecretaryofStatewouldnot,forexample,expecttoreleasethevendorfromitsobligationsundertheprogrammeiftheFundwerenotsosatisfied;andwouldnotexpecttheFundtoreleasethevendorfromitsobligationstotheFund.Wherenecessary,theSecretaryofStatemightimposenewobligationsonthevendor,theoperator,thepurchaseroranotherassociatedcompanyoftheoperatorasappropriatetoensurethattheObjectiveweremet.
5.12.7InapprovingtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeanddeterminingwhethertomodifytoimposefreshobligationsoncertainparties(ornottoreleasepartiesfromobligationstowhichtheyarealreadysubject)theSecretaryofStatewillhaveregardtosuchmattersas:
theviewsoftheFundontheproposedfundingarrangements;●●
thefinancialstrengthoftheproposednewowner,orinvestors,and●●
thesupportthatitwillprovidetotheoperatortoensurethattheFundaccumulatessufficientfundstomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesundertheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan;and
thecurrentleveloffundingascomparedtocurrentestimatesofthe●●
operator’sliabilitiesandplansforfuturefundinglevels.
evidenceoffailurebyanyofthepartiestoadheretotheirobligationsunder●●
theFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
5.12.8Furtherinformationabouttheexerciseofthepowertomodifyincaseswhereachangeofcontrolorotherrelevantchangeoccursissetoutinparagraphs5.13.1–5.13.10.
5.12.9Assumingachangeofownershipofthesiteleadstoachangeintheidentityofthesitelicensee,theEnergyBillensuresthataFundedDecommissioningProgrammemustbesubmittedbythenewoperator(andapprovedbytheSecretaryofState)priortoitsstartingtooperatethestation.ItisacriminaloffencetofailtooperateanewnuclearpowerstationwithoutanapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgrammeinplace.
111
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.13SecretaryofState’spowertomodifyaFundedDecommissioningProgramme
5.13.1ThematterstowhichtheSecretaryofStatewouldhaveregardwhendeterminingwhethertoapprove(ortoapprovewithmodifications)aFundingArrangementPlanwhentheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeisfirstsubmittedforapprovalaresetoutinparagraphs5.1.1–5.12.9.InformationaboutsomeofthecircumstancesinwhichoperatorsarerequiredtosubmitmodificationsforapprovalbytheSecretaryofStatefollowingfirstapprovaloftheprogrammearesetoutinparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16.Paragraphs5.13.2–5.13.10areprincipallyconcernedwithcaseswheretheSecretaryofStatemaychoosetoexercisehispowertomodifytheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeonceithadbeenapproved.
5.13.2Indeterminingwhether(andifso,onwhatterms)toproposeamodificationtotheFundingArrangementPlanortoapproveamodificationputforwardbytheoperatororanotherpersonwithobligationsundertheprogramme,theSecretaryofStatewouldhaveregardtothematterssetoutinthisguidance,andinparticularwhetherthemodificationisanecessary,appropriateorproportionatemeanstoensurethattheObjectiveismetandtheGuidingPrinciplescompliedwith.WhereoperatorsorothersuchpersonsconsiderproposingamodificationtotheFundingArrangementPlantheyshouldthereforeconsiderhowitaffectstheprospectsoftheObjectivebeingmetandcomplieswiththeGuidingPrinciples.
5.13.3ItisforoperatorstodeterminewhethertoproposeamodificationtotheprogrammeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofState(subjecttoanyregulationsmadeunderclause46oftheEnergyBillwhichrequireoperatorstoseektheapprovaloftheSecretaryofState)(seeparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16).Modificationsproposedbytheoperatormightincludechangestocostestimatesorcontributionschedulestotakeaccountofchangestothestationorinvestmentreturns,butmightalsoincludechangestotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammetoaccountfortechnicaloroperationalchangestothestationwhichhavehadaneffectonthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofwastedisposalliabilities.
5.13.4TheSecretaryofStatecanenvisagerequiringmodificationsinthefollowingnon-exhaustivesituations.
5.13.5Wheretheoperatororanotherpersonwithobligationsundertheprogrammeisinbreachoftheirobligationsundertheprogramme.
112
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
TheSecretaryofStatewouldnotexpecttomodifyaFunded●●
DecommissioningProgrammeineverycasewhereapersonisinbreach.Inmanycasesitmaybesufficienttoensurethatthepersonbringsitselfbackintocompliancewiththeprogrammeandremediestheconsequencesofthebreach.TheEnergyBillgivestheSecretaryofStatevariedpowers(suchasthepowertoimposeadirectionunderclause54)toensurethisoutcome.
Equally,itmaybethatmerelyrequiringthepersontobringitselfbackinto●●
compliancewiththeprogrammewouldnotbeappropriate.Forexample,itmaynolongerbesufficient,appropriateorproportionatetoseektoholdapersontoallitsobligationsintheoriginalapprovedprogrammebecauseofachangeinthatperson’scircumstances.Alternativelyitmightbeappropriatetointroduceconditionstotheapprovaloftheprogrammerequiringcertainactiontobetakenoradherencetocertainobligationsintheprogramme.Breachofthatconditionmayresultinanoffenceunderclause43oftheEnergyBillifthestationcontinuestooperate.
5.13.6Whereachangeofcontroloftheoperator,orachangeofabodycorporatewhichisassociatedwiththeoperatorisproposed47.
Guidanceaboutwhatisexpectedfromoperatorsifthereisachangeof●●
controloftheoperatororofanotherpersonwithobligationsundertheprogrammeissetoutinparagraphs5.12.1–5.12.9,whichtouchontheissueofmodifications.
TheSecretaryofState’sprimaryconcerninsuchaneventualitywouldbe●●
toensurethattheFundingArrangementPlancontinuestomakeadequatefinancialprovisionfortheoperator’sliabilitiesirrespectiveofthechangeofcontrol.Inthecaseofachangeofcontrol,theSecretaryofStatemightproposemodificationsto:
adjusttheliabilityoftheoutgoingparentcompanyunderanyguarantee●O
orothersupportprovidedinrelationtotheoperator’sliabilitiestotakeaccountofthefinancialcircumstancesoftheincomingparentcompany;
releasetheoutgoingparentcompanyfromitsobligations;●O
imposeobligationsontheoutgoingparentcompanywherepreviouslyit●O
hadnone;
adjustexistingobligationsonotherparentcompanies(forexample,inthe●O
caseofajointventure)totakeaccountofthepositionoftheincomingparentcompany;
imposefreshobligationsonotherexistinggroupcompaniestotake●O
accountoftheincomingparentcompany’sposition;
adjustobligationsontheoperatoraccordingly.●O
47 Achangeintheidentityoftheoperatorisnotaddressedinparagraphs5.13.1–5.13.10,becauseclause41(2)(b)requiresanewoperatorofanexisting“new”stationtosubmitanewFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforapprovalinanyevent,thereforethepowersunderclause44etseqwouldnotarise(althoughmodificationswouldbepossibleunderclause42(a)).Inadditionclause60givestheSecretaryofStatethepowertoholdtheoldoperatortocertainobligationsundertheprogramme.
113
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.13.7Whereatechnicaloroperationalchangeincreasesthenetpresentvalueofthethencurrentestimateoftheoperator’sliabilitiesabovethematerialitythreshold.
Asisclearfromparagraph5.6.12,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthe●●
operatortoseektheSecretaryofState’sapprovaltoanymodificationstotheFundedDecommissioningProgramme(otherthanthosetowhichregulationsmadeunderclause46oftheEnergyBillapply)whichsuchchangenecessitatesinaccordancewiththeprocedurelaiddowninclauses44and45oftheEnergyBill.Wheretheoperatorfailstodoso,theSecretaryofStatemightproposethenecessarymodifications,notleasttoensurethattheoperatordoesnotremaininbreachoftheprogrammeindefinitely.
5.13.8Wheretheoperatorseekspermissionfromtheregulatorstoextendthelifeofthestationbeyondtheperiodoriginallyanticipated48.
AssetoutintheDWMPguidance,anoperatormayseektonegotiate●●
arrangementsattheoutsetwhichapply(forexample,towastedisposal)intheeventofalifeextension.Evenifitdoesnot,aproposaltoextendthelifeofthestationwouldnecessitateamendmentstotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeforwhichtheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheoperatortoseekhisapproval.Wheretheoperatorfailedtodoso,theSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttoproposemodificationsasnecessaryhimself.
5.13.9ItispossibletoenvisageothercircumstanceswhichgiverisetoreasonabledoubtsabouttheabilityoftheoperatororanassociatedbodycorporatetodischargeitsobligationsundertheprogrammewheretheSecretaryofStatemayconsiderwhethertoproposeamodification.Examplesincludewherethecreditratingoftheoperatororofanassociatedcompanyisdowngradedandnoappropriatealternativesecurityiscapableofbeingputinplaceorputinplacesufficientlypromptly;wherethereisasignificantandmorethanshortlivedreductioninthenetassetvalueofsuchaperson;orwhereinsolvencyproceedingsaretakeninrespectof,orthreatenedagainst,suchaperson.
5.13.10Inallcases,theSecretaryofStatemayonlyapproveamodification(whetherproposedbyhimorbyanotherperson)ifhedoessowiththeaimofensuringthatprudentprovisionismadefortheactivitiesregulatedbytheEnergyBill(seeclause45(7)oftheEnergyBill).
48 Itisrecognisedthatthisscenarioislikelytofallwithinparagraph5.13.7abovebutisincludedfortheavoidanceofdoubt.
114
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
115
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5.14Glossary
5.14.1Fortheavoidanceofdoubt,pleasenotethatthisglossaryonlyreferstotheFundingArrangementPlanguidance.
Associated companies–meansassociatedbodiescorporatewithinthemeaningofclause62oftheEnergyBill2008.
Commissioning–meanstheprocessduringwhichplantcomponentsandsystems,havingbeenconstructedormodified,aremadeoperationalandverifiedtobeinaccordancewithdesignassumptionsandtohavemettheappropriatesafetycriteria.
Contribution schedule–meansthescheduleofpaymentswhichtheoperatorisrequiredtomaketotheFundtomeettheoperator’sliabilitiesundertheFundedDecommissioningProgrammesubmittedtotheSecretaryofStateforapprovalandapprovedbyhim(see5.5).
Decommissioning–
(a) Decommissioningbeginswhenthereactorisshutdownwithnointentionoffurtheruseforthepurposeofgeneratingelectricity.
(b) Decommissioningmeansdismantlingthestationandremediatingthesiteincludingwastemanagementbutnotincludingwastedisposaltoaconditionagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthority
(c) Decommissioningendswhenallstationbuildingsandfacilitieshavebeenremovedandthesitehasbeenreturnedtoanendstatewhichhasbeenagreedwiththeregulatorsandtheplanningauthority.
Decommissioning liabilities–meanstheliabilitieswhichariseinrelationtodecommissioningwhichincludethewastemanagementliabilitiesbutexcludethewastedisposalliabilities.
Decommissioning and Waste Management Plan (DWMP)–meansthatpartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammesubmittedtotheSecretaryofStatebytheoperatorwhichaddressesthematterssetoutinclauses41(7)(a)and(b)oftheEnergyBill.
Full share of waste management costs–meansthewastedisposalliabilitiesandthewastemanagementliabilities.
116
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Fund–meansatrustorothervehicleconstitutedforthepurposeofaccumulating,managingandinvestingmoneysobtainedfromtheoperatorforthepurposeoftheObjectiveandincludes,asthecontextpermitsorrequires,anypersonwhichisamemberof,orisresponsibleforthemanagementofthatentity.
Fund assets–meansfinancialassetsheldbytheFundforthepurposeoftheObjective.
Funding Arrangement Plan–meansthatpartoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammewhichaddressesthematterssetoutinclause41(7)(c)oftheEnergyBill.
Generating life time–meanstheperiodbeginningwiththedateonwhichthepowerstationfirstgenerateselectricity,andendingwiththedateonwhichthereactorisshutdownwithnointentionoffurtheruseforthepurposeofgeneratingelectricity.
Guiding Principles–meanstheprinciplessetoutinparagraph5.2.6whichtheSecretaryofStatemayapplywhenconsideringwhethertoapprove,approvewithmodificationsormodifyapreviouslyapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
Hazardous waste–hasthemeaningsetoutinclause63oftheEnergyBill.
Higher activity waste–meansintermediatelevelwasteandspentfuel.
Independent fund–meansaFundwhichcomplieswiththeprincipleofindependencesetoutinparagraph5.2.6above.49
New nuclear power station–anuclearinstallationconstructedafterthecommencementofclause41oftheEnergyBill2008towhichthatclauseapplies(otherthanbyvirtueofanordermadeunderclause58oftheBill).
Nuclear Island–includesanypartofthefacilityonarelevantsitewhichmightgiverisetoradioactivewasteorotherwiseaffecttheoperator’sliabilities.
Objective–meanstheobjectivesetoutinparagraph5.2.2.
Operator–thelegalpersonwhoholdsalicenceundertheNuclearInstallationsAct1965inrelationtothesitetowhichtheprogrammerelates,orwhohasappliedforsuchalicenceinrelationtosuchasite.
Operator’s liabilities–meansthoseliabilitiessetoutintheDWMPwhichtheFundisrequiredtomeetbeingthesumofthedecommissioningliabilitiesandthewastedisposalliabilities.
49 Paragraph5.3.5setsoutdetailsofavehiclewhichtheSecretaryofStateconsidersmaymeettheindependenceprinciple.
117
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Radioactive waste–hasthemeaningsetoutinSection2oftheRadioactiveSubstancesAct1993.
Relevant site–meansthesitetowhichtheFundedDecommissioningProgrammerelates.
Target Value–meansthevalueorsumwhichtheFundisrequiredtoachieveunderthetermsoftheapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
Waste management–means:
(a) treating,storingandtransportinghigheractivitywastependingdisposalpursuanttothescheduleagreedwiththeGovernment;
(b) treating,storing,transportinganddisposingoflowlevelwaste;
(c) treating,storing,transportinganddisposingofnon-radioactivehazardouswaste;and
(d) planningundertakenduringthegeneratinglifeofthestationorsubsequentlywhichisnecessaryinordertocarryoutdecommissioning.
Waste disposal–meansdisposingofhigheractivitywasteproducedontherelevantsiteinthemannerandsubjecttoascheduleagreedwiththeGovernment50.
Waste disposal liabilities–meanstheliabilitytopaythesumchargedtotheoperatorbytheGovernmentinconnectionwithanapprovedFundedDecommissioningProgrammeinrelationtothedisposalbyGovernmentofhigheractivitywasteproducedontherelevantsite.
Waste management liabilities–meansthecostofcarryingoutwastemanagementinsofarasthecostofundertakingthoseactivitiesisrequiredtobemetfromtheFund51.
50 ForthepurposesofthisglossarythereferencestotheGovernmentinthecontextofsettingafixedunitpriceforwasteandaschedulefortakingtitletoandliabilityforsuchwasteshouldbereadasreferencestocentralGovernmentandotherbodiesactingonbehalfofandfundedbycentralGovernment.
51 Table6setsoutmoreinformationabouttheactivitieswhichtheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttobepaidforbytheFund.
118
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
AnnexA:Reportingrequirements
Furthertoparagraphs5.6.1–5.6.16oftheFundingArrangementPlanguidance,belowistheannualandquinquennialreportingstructuretheSecretaryofStateconsiderswouldmeettheGuidingPrinciples.
Annual report
Theoperatorwillbeexpectedtoprepareanannualreport(promptlyfollowing1 theyeartowhichitrelates)settingoutoperationalandtechnicalchangestothesitewhichhaveaneffect,aboveademinimisreportingthresholdwhichwewouldexpecttobesetoutinregulations,onthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofwastedisposalliabilitiesincludedintheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.
Theannualreportshouldalsoincludedetailsofotherchanges(suchas2 licenceamendmentsorregulatoryrequirements),aboveademinimisreportingthresholdwhichwewouldexpecttobesetoutinregulations,thathaveoccurredoverthepreviousyearandwhichhaveaneffectonthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofthewastedisposalliabilitiesincludedintheFundedDecommissioningProgramme.Theannualreportshouldalsoincludeanexplanationoftheincreaseincostsforinflation.
Assetoutinparagraph5.6.13,ontheannualreview,wherethecumulative3 effectofsuchchanges(operational,technicalorotherwise)onthecostestimatesofdecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofthewastedisposalliabilitiesisaboveamaterialitythreshold,whichweexpectwouldbesetoutinregulations,thentheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtoproposeforapprovalbytheSecretaryofStateanymodificationtotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammenecessarytoupdatetheprogrammetotakeintoaccountthesechanges.
Theannualreportpreparedbytheoperatorshouldbemadeavailabletothe4 Fundpromptlyafterithasbeenprepared.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtoreviewtheoperator’sannualreporttosatisfythemselves,withreferencetotheinformationintheoperator’sannualreport,thatnomaterialchanges(operational,technicalorotherwise)haveoccurredinthepreviousannualperiod.TheFundwouldthenbeexpectedtoprepareandprovidetotheSecretaryofStatetheannualreportfromtheoperatorandanannualreportonthesizeandperformanceoftheFund.
119
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
5 ThepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtotakeadvicefromsuitablyqualifiedexpertsoperatingunderappropriatelevelsofprofessionalindemnitycoverinreviewingtheoperator’sannualreportandinrelationtothereviewoftheFund.
6 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheannualreporttobedrawnupandsubmittedtohimpromptlyfollowingtheendoftheperiodtowhichitrelates.
7 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheannualreporttobeaddressedtohim.
8 Duringthedecommissioningphase,theoperatorandthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtoprovideannualreportsasoutlinedinparagraph5.8.5.
Quinquennial report
BoththeoperatorandthosepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFund9 willbeexpectedtoprepareandpublishanin-depthreviewoftheFundedDecommissioningProgrammeonaquinquennialbasis.TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpecttheoperatortoberesponsibleforreportingonmatterswhichconcernedtheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan,andthepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundtoreportonmatterswhichconcernedtheFundingArrangementPlan.
TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthequinquennialreportstoaddressthe10 followingissues:
First,theoperatorshouldprovideadetailedsummaryofthechanges●●
(operational,technicalorotherwise)tothesitewhichhavehadaneffectonthecostestimatesofthedecommissioningliabilitiesortheamountofwastedisposalliabilitiesassetoutintheannualreportsforeachofthepreviousfiveyears.TheoperatorshouldalsocarryoutatechnicalreviewastotheadequacyofthearrangementssetoutintheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan,takingintoaccountforexample,newadvancesintechnologyorchangestoestablishedpractices.Theestimatesofthecostsofdecommissioningliabilitiesandtheamountofwastedisposalliabilitiesshouldbere-assessedinthelightofthechangesandthetechnicalreviewandtheoperatorshouldproposemodificationstothetheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlantotakethesefactorsintoaccount.Theoperatorshouldsubmititsreportofthein-depthreviewoftheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlantothepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundpromptlyafterithasbeenprepared.
Second,thepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundshouldbesatisfied●●
withtheadequacyandtheaccuracyoftheinformationintheoperator’sreportandtheproposedmodificationstotheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlanandapprove,or,asnecessary,suggestmodificationstotheproposedamendmentstotheDecommissioningandWasteManagementPlan.
120
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
Third,thepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundshouldprovidea●●
detailedsummaryofthesizeandperformanceoftheFundbasedontheannualreportsforeachofthepreviousfiveyearsandtakingintoaccount,forexample,achangeininvestmentpolicyorsharepricefluctuationsaffectingthevalueoftheinvestments.ThepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundshouldalsocarryoutareviewoftheexpectedperformanceoftheFundandthelikelihoodthattheFundwouldgeneratesufficientmoneystodischargetheoperator’sliabilitiesinfullasandwhenthosemoneyswereneeded.
Fourth,theSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpectthosepersonsresponsible●●
formanagingtheFundtoreviewtheFundingArrangementPlaninthelightofthechangesreferredtoandtoconsider,inparticular,what,ifany,modificationstotheFundingArrangementPlanwerenecessarytoensuretheFundmeetstheoperator’sliabilities.TheSecretaryofStatewouldalsoexpectthosepersonstoreviewandtakeintoaccountactualandexpectedinvestmentreturnsandexpectedstationlife.ThepersonsresponsibleformanagingtheFundwillbeexpectedtotakeadvicefromsuitablyqualifiedexpertsoperatingunderappropriatelevelsofprofessionalindemnitycover.
11 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthequinquennialreporttosetout,atleast,there-assessedcostestimatesfordecommissioningliabilities,changestotheamountofwastedisposalliabilities,theexpectedadequacyoftheFundtomeetitsliabilitiesandmodificationstotheFundedDecommissioningProgrammefortheSecretaryofStatetoapprove.
12 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthequinquennialreporttobedrawnupandsubmittedtohimpromptlyfollowingtheendoftheperiodtowhichitrelates.
13 TheSecretaryofStatewouldexpectthequinquennialreporttobeaddressedtohim.
14 Thequinquennialreviewwillreplacetheannualreviewfortheyearforwhichitisprepared.
121
The energy Bill 2008 Consultation on Funded Decommissioning Programme guidance for new nuclear Power Stations
AnnexB:TheConsultationCodeofPracticeCriteria
Thesixconsultationcriteria:
1 Consultwidelythroughouttheprocess,allowingaminimumof12weeksforwrittenconsultationatleastonceduringthedevelopmentofthepolicy.
2 Beclearaboutwhatyourproposalsare,whomaybeaffected,whatquestionsarebeingaskedandthetimescaleforresponses.
3 Ensurethatyourconsultationisclear,conciseandwidelyaccessible.
4 Givefeedbackregardingtheresponsesreceivedandhowtheconsultationprocessinfluencedthepolicy.
5 Monitoryourdepartment’seffectivenessatconsultation,includingthroughtheuseofadesignatedconsultationco-ordinator.
6 Ensureyourconsultationfollowsbetterregulationbestpractice,includingcarryingoutaRegulatoryImpactAssessmentifappropriate.
ThecompletecodeisavailableontheCabinetOffice’swebsite,addresshttp://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/regulation/consultation/index.asp