Consumer Insights New Orleans, January 30, 2019
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1Economic Outlook
2Beef & Protein Supplies
3Channel Perspective
4Overall Consumer Attitudes
5Consumers and Beef Recalls
6Understanding Red Meat Messaging
7Meat Alternatives
8Segmentation
1Economic Outlook
2019 growth is projected to slow. Employment and Wages are supportive; investment is uncertain.
Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis; Forecast: Wall Street Journal Economic Forecasting Survey, January 2019.
-10.0%
-8.0%
-6.0%
-4.0%
-2.0%
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019
Perc
ent C
hang
e fr
om P
rior Y
ear
Quarterly Percent Change in Real GDP
fore
cast
2BEEF & PROTEIN SUPPLIES
53.9
58.3
5052545658606264666870
Poun
ds
U.S. Per Capita Net Beef Consumption
+8.2%
2019 beef consumption is expected to increase
Source: USDA WASDE, December 11, 2018
0
50
100
150
200
250
Poun
ds
U.S. Per Capita Meat & Poultry Consumption
Beef Pork Chicken Turkey Other
222.4220.2
2019 meat & poultry consumption is projected to be record-high
Source: USDA WASDE, December 11, 2018
200.3
3THE CHANNEL PERSPECTIVE:
BEEF AT RETAIL AND FOODSERVICE
2018 retail Beef demand has been strong!Even November out-performed
859095
100105110115120125
Jan-
12A
pr-1
2Ju
l-12
Oct
-12
Jan-
13A
pr-1
3Ju
l-13
Oct
-13
Jan-
14A
pr-1
4Ju
l-14
Oct
-14
Jan-
15A
pr-1
5Ju
l-15
Oct
-15
Jan-
16A
pr-1
6Ju
l-16
Oct
-16
Jan-
17A
pr-1
7Ju
l-17
Oct
-17
Jan-
18A
pr-1
8Ju
l-18
Oct
-18
Chart 1: U.S. Retail Total Beef Demand Index
Source: Tonsor, Schroeder, Creating and Assessing Candidate Food Service and Retail Beef Demand Indices, January 2017. IRI/Freshlook, Total US MULO ending 11/26/18; Categorized by VMMeat System
2018 vs. 2012: +15%2018 vs. 2017: +6%
10
2018 was an excellent year for Beef at retail. More lower-value cuts were sold as Ground.
-4.0%-2.0%0.0%2.0%4.0%6.0%8.0%
10.0%12.0%
Dollars Pounds Price
Perc
ent C
hang
e
Retail Beef Sales: 2018 vs. 2017 (Jan-Nov)
Total Beef Ground Beef Rib & Loin Steaks Roasts*
*Chuck, Round, Shoulder, Minor PrimalsSource: IRI/Freshlook, Total US MULO ending 11/26/18; Categorized by VMMeat System
7,737
7,816
8,037 8,028
2015 2016 2017 2018
11
Beef volume at foodservice was steady in 2018, despite the challenging year for restaurants
*At the operator purchase, or distributor sales level.Source: 2018 Beef at Foodservice Volumetric Study, Technomic, Inc.
Change in Beef PoundsIn M Lbs.
64%13%
11%
6%4% 2%
2018 Annual Total, In B Lbs.
Ground Beef Pre-cut SteaksRoasts Other BeefPre-cooked Roast Ribs
8.028B Lbs.
• Drives check average (+19)72%• Can make a successful LTO (+20)65%• Increases traffic (+17) 62%• Brings in bigger parties (+19)57%• Eliminates the “veto vote” (+21)49%
Importance of steak on the menu: Operators say steak…
Source: 2018 Beef at Foodservice Volumetric Study, Technomic, Inc.
13
• Overall economy• Uncertainty
• Total protein supplies• Exports/Imports
• Competitive protein prices
2019 question marks…
4Consumer Attitudes
15
Two thirds of consumers are positive towards beef overall, with few fee ling negative ; however, bee f trails chicken
Perceptions
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
Negative , 13%
Neutral, 20%
Strongly Pos, 36%
Some Pos, 31%
Positive , 67%
Overall Beef Pe rceptions
6%
Neutral, 13%
Strongly Pos, 45%
Some Pos, 35%
Positive , 80%
Overall Chicken Perceptions
16
The majority of consumers are eating beef weekly
Consumption
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
Weekly+ Beef Eate r
70%
Weekly+ Chicken Eate r
81%
17
The top reason to eat more beef, by far, is taste
Future Consumption
20%
22%
22%
23%
29%
55%
Discovering new beef recipes
Adding protein to your diet
Grilling more often
A beef meal is quick and easy to prepare
Beef is my #1 protein choice
You enjoy the taste of beef
Top Reasons to Eat More Bee f
Plan to Eat More
13%
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
18
The reasons for eating less beef are related to health and price
Future Consumption
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
24%
24%
31%
31%
32%
Cutting back due to health conditions such asheart disease, diabetes, etc.
Concerned beef will negatively impact long-termhealth
Beef has too much fat
Price is too expensive
Other meats are healthier
Top Reasons to Less More Bee f
Plan to Eat Less
14%
Beef performs on par or greater than chicken when it comes to top consideration factors such as taste , preparation, and expe rience , but falls short on fit with budge t
Beef vs Chicken
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
86% 82% 79% 79% 77%83% 81%
66% 71%80%81% 82% 81%
73%79%
Is great tasting Know how to prepare it Fits my budget Is safe to eat Is a very pleasurableeating experience
Considered Most Agree Beef is Doing It Agree Chicken Is Doing It
Top 10 consideration factors T2B scores
20
• Production Perceptions for Beef and Chicken are on a similar plateau
Production Perceptions
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
Negative , 23%
Neutral, 39%
Strongly Pos, 14%
Some Pos, 23%
Positive , 37%
Chicken Production Perceptions
Negative , 19%
Neutral, 44%
Strongly Pos, 14%
Some Pos, 23%
Positive , 37%
Beef Production Perceptions
21
For the most part, the majority of consumers trust the beef industry's practices, with anothe r se t of consumers who are also on the fence
Top Trust Metrics
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
48%
51%
51%
51%
52%
53%
54%
66%
69%
Environmental practices are continuously improving
Sanitation guidelines when processing/packaging meat
Beef does not negatively impact your long-term health
Cattle are given room to roam
Cattle health is a priority
The safety of beef is continually researched
Protocols to prevent diseases in beef are followed
Beef is safe to eat
Beef is nutritious
22
Compared to other higher budget brands, BIWFD performs well
Awareness
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
10%
30%
50%
54%
57%
65%
42%
Pork. Be Inspired
Avocados from Mexico
Chick-fil-A. Eat Mor Chikin
Papa John’s. Be tte r Ingredients, Be tte r Pizza
Arby’s. We Have the Meats
McDonald’s. I’m lovin’ it
Bee f. It’s What’s For Dinne rComparison of Aided Awareness
5Consumers and Beef Recalls
24
Ground beef recalls for Salmonella: • October 4, 2018• December 4, 2018
Background
25
Safety consideration peaked in October, but has since declined slightly; beef safe ty agreement has remained steady
“Is Safe to Eat” Consideration & Agreement
73%70%
72% 73%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Agree Beef is Safe
77%81% 79%
76%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Consider Safety of Protein
T2B Consumer consideration for protein “Is safe to eat”
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
% Consumers who score beef 70-100
26
Across safety trust metrics, beef has seen only a small decline with the recalls in October and has since re turned to previous leve ls
Safety Specific Trust Metrics
68%64% 67% 67%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Beef is safe to eat
55%50% 54% 57%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
The safety of beef is continually researched and monitored
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
52%49%
51% 53%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Sanitation guidelines followed when processing and packaging meat
T2B Agreement
27
October recalls impacted consumer perceptions of food safety when it came to ground bee f
Consumer Food Safety Grades (A or B)
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
69% 63% 65% 59%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Fresh hamburger/Ground beef
69% 69% 73%64%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Fresh Beef Steaks & Roasts
28
Consumer concern for beef safety remained lower, and more consistent over time compared to fre sh chicken and vege tables
Concern for Food Safety in Category
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
14% 18% 16% 16%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Fresh Beef
19% 21% 22% 23%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Fresh Chicken
16%11%
27%15%
July - Sept Oct Nov Dec
Fresh Vegetables
T2B Concern for Food Safety at Supermarkets
29
E. coli and Salmonella, while top of mind for consumers, did not change through July and September to October to December
Food Illness Influencers
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
28%
34%
28%
34%
Beef E.Coli Beef Salmonella
July - Sept Oct - Dec
6Red Meat Messaging
31
Background & Methodology
18 or older
No negative perception of meat
Beef Eaters
Screening Criteria• Total Sample N=1092OBJECTIVES:• Protein Perceptions• Dietary recommendations
consumers most likely to follow• Educating consumers on red meat• Diet Perceptions
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018
32
Being high in protein and having great taste/flavor are the most mentioned positive associations consumers have with red meat
Positive Associations
18%
11%
6%
4%
4%
4%
3%
Taste/Flavor
Filling/Hearty
Natural/Organic
Vitamins/Nutrients
Versatile
Lean or low in fat
Iron
20%Prote in
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018 A5. First, please list all of the positive terms/phrases that you see or hear used to describe red meat.
33
Negative associations with red meat revolved around health aspects with 19% of consumers not be ing able to think of anything negative .
Negative Associations
12%
10%
9%
3%
19%
Unhealthy
Bad for heart
High in cholesterol
Cancer
Don't know/None19%High in Fat
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018 A6. Next, please list all of the negative terms/phrases that you see or hear used to describe red meat.
14%
18%
48%
49%
15%
11%
79%
81%
55%34
Steak and Ground Bee f have the strongest association with Red Meat while Poultry and Fish have a strong tie to Lean Meat
Red and Lean Meat Protein Associations
88%
78%
32%
24%
23%
21%
8%
6%
6%
Steak
Ground Beef
Lamb
Pork
Bacon
Sausage
Chicken
Turkey
FishSource: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018
Lean Meat Protein Associations Red Meat Protein Associations
35
Balanced diets have higher ratings of being healthy and delicious
Common Diet Perceptions
Balanced Diet
Low Carb Diet
Plant Based Diet
Mediterranean Diet
Nutritious
Healthy
Delicious
Protein Packed
Something I crave
70%
70%
67%
60%
57%
44%
54%
35%
43%
23%
55%
60%
33%
27%
18%
51%
53%
49%
47%
30%
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018
36
Steak and Ground Beef have a clear place in balanced diets
Proteins Associated with Diets
Balanced Diet
Low CarbDiet
Mediterranean Diet
Plant Based Diet
Chicken 75% 65% 50% 14%
Turkey 70% 63% 37% 11%
Steak 67% 47% 36% 11%Fish 66% 66% 64% 16%
Ground Beef 63% 41% 28% 12%
Pork 60% 45% 35% 10%
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018
Dietary Recommendations that suggested eliminating specific foods
underperformed compared to more inclusive recommendations
Dietary Recommendations
Source: Defining Red Meat Study October 2018
MEAT SUBSTITUTES
38
7
Foodservice & Retail: Animal Proteins and Beef vs. Substitutes (billion pounds)
14; 99.5%
0.07; 0.5%
Beef vs. Beef Substitutes
Beef Beef Substitutes
23.3; 99.9%
0.034; 0.1%
Animal Proteins vs. Substitutes
All Animal Proteins AP Substitutes
Sources: Alternative Proteins at Foodservice Study, Technomic, October 2018; Usage and Volumetric Assessment of Beef in Foodservice, Technomic, December 2017;IRI, Refrigerated/Frozen Meat Substitutes, 52 weeks ending 6/16/18; IRI/Freshlook, Total US MULO ending 5/28/18; Categorized by VMMeat System
0
50
100
150
200
250
Poun
ds
U.S. Per Capita Meat & Poultry Consumption
Beef Pork Chicken Turkey Other
222.4220.2
2019 meat & poultry consumption is projected to be record-high
Source: USDA WASDE, December 11, 2018; Alternative Proteins at Foodservice Study, Technomic, October 2018; IRI Refrigerated and Frozen Meat Substitutes, July 2018
200.3vs. 0.37
MeatSubstitutes
1.5 servingsper person
per year
41
Meat Substitutes and Consumers
Never tried meat
substitutes33%
Tried, but rarely
consume20%
Tried & consume at
least monthly47%
Meat Substitutes
Alternative Proteins at Foodservice, Technomic, October 2018
42
Items Consumers Eat Instead of MeatOf the 34% claiming to avoid eating meat monthly, most aren’t replacing meat with traditional meat substitute s
55%
54%
44%
41%
38%
36%
32%
29%
27%
27%
Beans, rice, lentil or grain-based dishes
Salads
Pizza without meat toppings
Vegetable or musroom-based dishes
Baked/other potatoes
Egg-based dishes
Favorite dishes without meat (e.g. spaghetti)
Meat-less sandwiches or wraps
Plant-based protein patties, or "meat-like" crumbles
Nuts
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
43
Reasons for Choosing Meat SubstitutesMost consider meat substitutes specifically due to their healthier perceptions. Based on those who have intentionally avoided eating meat.
53%
35%
29%
28%
26%
Healthier than meat
Taste/flavor you enjoy as much as meat
Safer than meat
Reduces mistreatment of animals
More environmentally friendly
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
44
Meat Substitute Users Beef ConsumptionThe majority of meat substitute users still eat beef
70% 70%62%
73%
8%13%
6% 6%
Total Weekly+Meat Sub Eater
Monthly+Meat Sub Eater
Rarely Eat Meat Subs
Eat Beef Weekly+ Do Not Eat Beef
Source: Consumer Beef Tracker
Meat Substitute Consumption
8Segmentation
Consumer Segmentation
*Cluster analysis or clustering is the task of grouping a set of objects (consumers) in such a way that consumers in the same segment are more similar to each other than to those in other segments.
• Online survey and cluster analysis resulted in six consumer segments.
• Three segments identified as being high opportunity, representing over 70% of older millennial parents
• Ongoing analysis using the Consumer Beef Tracker will further profile the segments to maximize utility
Source: Segmentation Study – April – July 2018
Common Themes
Several themes are common across all segments:
• Consumers enjoy the taste of bee f and consume it regularly
• Children in the household can shift be lie fs/aspirations
• Most approach the weekend diffe rently when it comes to food
Pillars
TASTE
STRENGTH
RESPONSIBLE
4.4 82
3.8 73
3.5 64
BEEFPERFORMANCE
PROTEINIMPORTANCE
Average rating of attributes within each pillar5-pt Scale 100-pt Scale
Source: Segmentation Study – April – July 2018
Segment Overview
Family Food Enthusiasts Disciplined Doers Social
EatersConvenience
Seekers Confident Cooks Budget Basics
Segment MembershipTotal Sample
n=306 n=344 n=419 n=219 n=290 n=348
Segment Membership
Older Millennials w/ Kids
Beef Consumption
weekly+
At Home
Away From Home
16%
27%
76%
53%
22%
26%
80%
56%
18%
19%
71%
43%
15%
8%
81%
42%
11%
8%
75%
52%
18%
8%
77%
40%
Source: Segmentation Study – April – July 2018
Segment Overview
CONFIDENT COOKSConsumers who are more positive about beef with a passion for cooking and preparing meals at home. Highly confident in shopping for and cooking all types of beef.
CONVENIENCE SEEKERS
Hectic households who don't enjoy cooking and tend to eat for ease/convenience at home and when dining out. Taste and convenience tend to be greater drivers than health and nutrition.
BUDGETBASICS
Consumers with simple diets and lower incomes, who prioritize price and taste over nutrition. While favorable towards beef, they prefer simple meals and don’t eat out often.
Source: Segmentation Study – April – July 2018
Segment Overview
FAMILY FOOD ENTHUSIASTS
Larger, more affluent, active households who strive to be healthy. Enthusiastic about food and the overall meal experience, they eat out often and care more about how food is raised/processed.
SOCIAL EATERS
Slightly younger consumers who frequently eat a wide variety of proteins. They enjoy socializing, eating with friends and often eat beef, both at home and when dining out.
DISCIPLINED DOERSWell educated consumers who are more conscious about their health. With somewhat limited diets, they have disciplined eating habits and prioritize the nutrition of lean proteins over taste/flavor.
Source: Segmentation Study – April – July 2018
THANK YOUThe presentation reflects highlights from several projects. Feel free to reach out to the team for any
further questions on any of the topics.
Rick Husted, Vice President, Market Research & Strategic Planning [email protected] Krebs, Director, Market Intelligence, [email protected]
Shawn Darcy, Director, Market Research, [email protected] Patton, Associate Director, Market Research, [email protected]
Beejan Mehrabani, Associate Director, Market Research, [email protected]