Date post: | 01-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | basil-johns |
View: | 20 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20091
Carolin Thönnissen, Sabine Walper, Alexandra
Langmeyer, Franziska Schmahl and Markus Schaer
LMU Munich
Research Aims and Assessment Program
in the Domain of Parenting, Parent-
Child Relations, and Child Development
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20092
Content
I. Parenting, Parent-Child Relations and Child Well-Being als Research Topics in the Pairfam Project
II. Research Issues and Goals1. Parenting as Goal-Oriented Behavior
2. Parenting and Child-Well-Being
3. Parenting and parent-child relations in the family system
4. Personal and Contextual Influences on Parenting and Parent-Child Relations
III. Assessment Program
IV. Questions for Discussion
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20093
I. Parenting, Parent-Child-Relationships and Child Well-Being as Research Topics in the Pairfam Project
Background:
• social change in parenting since the 1960ies
• little empirical research in Germany
Starting Point:
• High significance of parenting for children’s well-being
• High salience of experiences in the parenting role for parents Motivational perspective: a focus on parents’ and
children's’ needs
• Parent-child relationships are linked to other family relations Systemic perspective: a focus on mutual influences
between subsystems of the family
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20094
The motivational perspective:
• Personal goals for well-being (Deci & Ryan, 1993, Nieboer et al.,
2005, Baltes & Silverberg, 1994):
Pursued / met in parent-child-relationships?
comfort / security affection / relatedness behavioral confirmation /
competence
status stimulation autonomy
I. Parent-child relations as research topics in the pairfam project
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
Inter-generational
&Partnership
relations
Child well-being
Parent-child relations / parenting
Parental well-being
5
I. Parent-child relations as research topics in the pairfam project
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
II. Research Issues
(1) Parenting as goal-oriented behavior
(2) Parenting and child well-being
(3) Parenting and parent-child relations in the family system
(4) Personal and contextual influences on parenting and parent-child relationships
6
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20097
(1) Parenting as goal oriented behavior
Basic assumption:
parenting goals play an organizing role in child rearing (e.g. Brezinka, 1995)
Influences on parenting goals: Social change increasing emphasis on children‘s self
actualization instead of obedience (e.g. Schneewind & Ruppert, 1995; Hillmann, 2003)
Cultural background (Friedlmeier et al., 2003)
Regional differences (Häder, 1998)
Socio-economic status and occupational experiences (Meulemann, 1997)
Intergenerational transmission (Schneewind & Ruppert, 1995)
II. Research Issues
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20098
Discrepancies between parenting goals and parenting practices are likely, e.g. due to
economical problems (Gershoff et al., 2007)
partnership conflicts (Cui & Conger, 2008)
social pressure (Park & Kwon, 2009)
Research goals here: view parenting goals within the larger framework of parents’ goals (e.g. VOC, value of partnership)
investigate changes in parenting goals due to life circumstances and experiences in the parenting role
investigate links between parenting goals and practices
address issues of intergenerational transmission and partner match / mutual influences between partners
(1) Parenting as goal oriented behavior
II. Research Issues and Goals
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.20099
• Parenting: highly influential factor in children‘s social development (Gabriel & Bodenmann, 2006; Reichle & Gloger-Tippelt, 2007)
• Basic dimensions: Warmth
Control Authoritative parenting (Baumrind, 1991; Steinberg, 2001)
• But: different types of control different outcomes (Cowan et al., 2005; Galambos et al., 2003)
• Stimulation and promoting competence: Increasing focus on cultural capital, but problems in assessing stimulating, age appropriate experiences (e.g. Schauenberg, 2008)
• Strong need for longitudinal data e.g. due to mutual influences between parenting and child development (Beelmann et al., 2007)
(2) Parenting and child well-being
II. Research Issues
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.200910
Research Goals:
• Replication of parenting styles (focusing different types of control)
• basic “epidemiological” information differences between mothers and fathers, by SES etc.
• Predictors of parenting practices / parenting styles: Early precursors? Stability across time? Effects of family structure? Economic conditions Intergenerational transmission
• Short- and long term outcomes of parenting – Moderating effects of child characteristics– Joint and unique influences of maternal / paternal parenting– The role of separated fathers
(2) Parenting and child well-being
II. Research Goals
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.200911
• Interparental relationship as predictor for child aspects
• Coparenting: salient in everyday parenting (Belsky et al., 1995; Gabriel & Bodenmann, 2006)
• Match of parenting strategies
• Active mutual support / undermining between both parents
• Coparenting conflicts • predictor for negative parenting (Hetherington, 2006)
• Children‘s problem behavior (Feinberg et al., 2007)
• Emotional strain (Katz & Low, 2004)
cross-sectional data, no causal evidence
(3) Parenting and parent-child relations in the family system
II. Research Issues
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.200912
Research goals:
• Investigate links between coparenting and other features of the partnership (e.g. partner match, marital quality) and the direction of effects across time
• Identify other predictors of coparenting quality (e.g. economic strain, parents’ personality and well-being)
• Identify longitudinal effects of coparenting on children‘s well-being/ behavioral development, e.g. with a focus on parenting
• Test for reciprocal effects between child adjustment and coparenting
(3) Parenting and parent-child relations in the family system
II. Research Goals
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.200913
• Parents‘ personality and well-being as influence on parenting and parent-child-relations• maternal depressiveness (Foster et al., 2008)
• parents’ competence/ self-efficacy (Sanders & Wooley, 2005)
• self-esteem (Saile & Kühnemund, 2001)
• The role of contextual stressors / resources: marital quality, economic resources, occupational demands, …
• Recent focus on negative attributions: vicious circle
Studies are mostly cross-sectional or do not focus reverse effects
(4) Personal and contextual influences on parenting and parent-child relations
II. Research Issues
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.200914
Research Goals:
• To investigate effects of external stressors / resources on parenting and parent-child relations (and vice versa) in longitudinal perspective
– Particularly: unemployment, poverty
• To identify spill-over effects of individual stressors into the partner’s parenting (e.g. father’s unemployment mother’s parenting)
• To address the mediating role of parents‘ negative attributions
(4) Personal and contextual influences on parenting and parent-child relations
II. Research Issues
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
III. Assessment Program
Wave 2: Assessment of parenting only for youngest child age 8 – 15 in the target person‘s household
Dyadic (Triadic) approach: • Maternal report
• Paternal report
• Child report (age 8+) about maternal parenting
• Child report (age 8+) about paternal parenting
Focus (shifting across waves) on • Parents in the household (including stepparents) or• Biological parents (irrespective of household
membership)
15
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
III. Assessment Program
Domains within the Assessment Program:
• Perceptions and Dispositions in the Parenting Role autonomy Self-efficacy / competence Negative attributions Readiness to make sacrifices Subjective strain
• Parenting goals• Control
– Induction– Monitoring– strict control– inconsistent parenting– Child dominance
16
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
• Relationship quality– Parental warmth
– negative parental communication
– Child intimacy with parents
– Parental estimation of child
– Conflict
– Parental reliability
• Child emotional insecurity (only adolescent self report)– Ambivalence
– Fear of love withdrawal
– Engulfment anxiety
III. Assessment Program
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
• Child Behavior– SDQ: hyperactivity
» Conduct problems
» emotional problems
» Problems with peers
» Prosocial behavior
– Social integration
– Temperament (newborns)
• Selected contextual factors– Economic deprivation
– Coparenting
– Classroom cohesion
– Peer rejection
III. Assessment Program
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
IV. Questions
Issues of Measurement: • Measuring parenting across childhood and adolescence
Selection of age-appropriate indicators:
How about children below age 3? Equivalence of indicators for different age groups?
• Measuring child characteristics / children‘s development across different life stages of the children – Assessment of child temperament up to age 6?
19
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
IV. Questions
Issues of Design:
• Advantages and disadvantages of extending the assessment to other children in the household
• High assessment load for parents Child self report instead of or in addition to parental self report?
• Changing content focus as solution for the high assessment load for parents?
– Either focus on parenting / parent child relations
– Or focus on child behavior / development
• Shift from CAPI to CASI or PAPI when children reach age 11: methodological problems?
20
Thönnissen, Walper, Langmeyer, Schmahl, Schaer, Bremen, 03.07.2009
Thank you for your attention
21