Contribution of the Belgian Cancer Registry to Cancer Screening Programs:
Plan-Do-Check-Act
Julie Francart
Isabel De Brabander
Cancer screening programs in Belgium
50-69 yrs
50-69 yrs
50-69 yrs 50-74 yrs
50-74 yrs
25-64 yrs
50-74 yrs
Databases and linkages
IMA/AIM data Breast
IMA/AIM data Colon
IMA/AIM data Cervix
Laboratories for pathological Anatomy
Health insurance compagnies
Belgian Cancer Registry
ScreeningPrograms Cancer
registry
IMA/AIM data Cancer
Oncological care programs
Unique identifier:SSN
Cervix Breast Colon
Cyto-Histo pathology registry (CHP)
Contribution of the Belgian Cancer Registry
Plan – Do – Check - Act
Available Data on:• Diagnostic/screening procedures• Description of lesion
(no, benign, malign)
• Follow-up/Treatment
Research projects
Evaluation/Quality assurance
Cost-effectiveness
Policymaking
Exclusion lists: reducing costs and overscreening
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Nu
mb
er o
f m
am
mo
grap
hie
s o
uts
ide
the s
creen
ing
pro
gram
Months before participation to screening
Overscreening in the Flemish breast cancer screening program
2015
2016
2017
▪ Check: % of overscreened participants
to organized screening, Flemish Region
▪ Plan/Do: Implementation
of exclusion lists
In 2015, more then 11.000
women were overscreened
Exclusion lists: reducing costs and overscreening
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Nu
mb
er o
f m
am
mo
grap
hie
s o
uts
ide
the s
creen
ing
pro
gram
Months before participation to screening
Overscreening in the Flemish breast cancer screening program
2015
2016
2017
▪ Check 2017: almost 4800 less women
were overscreened compared to 2015
▪ Act: Implementation of exclusion lists
at the end of 2016, Flemish Region
Exclusion lists: reducing costs and overscreening
▪ Check 2017: 15% of the target
population, n=180.178, could be
excluded
▪ Reducing cost invitation letters
and FIT tests
▪ Act: Exclusion lists, Walloon Region
13,0%
1,7%
84,9%
0,0%
10,0%
20,0%
30,0%
40,0%
50,0%
60,0%
70,0%
80,0%
90,0%
100,0%
Target population-July 2017
Exclusions, colorectal cancer screening, Walloon Region 2017
To be invited
Exclusion because ofFaecal occult blood test
Exclusion because ofColonoscopy
Exclusion because ofColorectal cancer/colectomy
0,5%
From screening results toFollow-up data and Fail-safe
IMA-data Cervix
Belgian Cancer Registry
Cervix CHP
Cancer registry
All cervical samples diagnoses: Pap smears, HPV tests, Biopsies,…
All cervical cancer diagnoses
All cervical diagnostic or therapeutic procedures
Laboratories for pathological Anatomy
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
14
20
15
20
16
From screening results toFollow-up data and Fail-safe
▪ Check: Evaluate % of abnormal cytology without follow-up, Flemish Region
Total number of cytologies •210.038
Abnormal cytologies
•16.173 (8%)
Without follow-up within 12
months
•3.235 (20%)
Flemish Region, eligible population 2016, reimbursed cytologies
93%84%
7%16%
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
HSIL (n=1246) ASC-H (n=946)
% of High grade or ASC-H lesions without follow-up within 12 months
Known follow-up Unknown follow-up
n=82 n=150
▪ Plan: Fail-safe
▪ Do: Implementation of Fail-safe
mechanism, Flemish Region
Clinicians
▪ Act: First Fail-safe list to CvKO (Oct 2018)
1st phase: 287 ♀ with
HSIL or ASC-H
▪ Check impact by BCR
From screening results toFollow-up data and Fail-safe
Cancer detection and characteristics▪ Check: Number and stage of screen detected
cancers, interval cancers and cancers in non-participants, Flemish Region
50,9%
24,2% 27,2%
26,1%
17,7%19,3%
8,3%
20,4%17,0%
11,8%
20,3% 20,7%
2,9%
17,4% 15,7%
0,0%
20,0%
40,0%
60,0%
80,0%
100,0%
Screen detected cancers(n=2.042)
Cancers in nonparticipants (n=1.447)
Interval cancers(n=305)
Stage in screen detected cancers, interval cancers and cancers in non participants, Flemish eligible
population, incidence year 2015
IV
III
II
I
0
▪ Plan/Do/Act:More detailed investigation of interval cancers:
Gender-Age- numerical FIT result-Screening round- Tumor localization- History of adenoma/colonoscopies
Collaboration with:
Take home messages
▪ Close collaboration between the BCR and the cancer screening programs leads to:
• A cost-effective organization of the screening programs
• Quality assurance and improvement of the screening programs
▪ Data handling, -linkage and -exchange is indispensable for the quality assurance of screening programs and should be in line with privacy regulations