Date post: | 04-Jul-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | gianluca-antonelli |
View: | 266 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Control problems for floating-base manipulators
Gianluca Antonelli
Universita di Cassino e del Lazio Meridionale
http://webuser.unicas.it/lai/robotica
http://www.eng.docente.unicas.it/gianluca antonelli
Universita di Palermo, 27 February 2014
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Space, aerial and underwater vehicle-manipulators
DLRCanadian Space Agency
ALIVE
normal robots but
floating base
kinematic coupling
dynamic coupling
unstructured environment
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Cooperation
RedSea project
RedSea project
AMADEUS
ARCAS
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Aerial Robotics Cooperative Assembly
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Aerial Robotics Cooperative Assembly
ΣoΣe,1 Σe,2
Σv,1 Σv,2
Our task: cooperative control of the bar
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Marine Autonomous Robotics for InterventionS
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Marine Autonomous Robotics for InterventionS
Our task: cooperative control of the bar
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Floating robots kinematics
Oi
η1
ηee
❅❅❘endeffector velocities
❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❍❥Jacobian
system velocitiesηee =
[ηee1
ηee2
]= J(RI
B, q)ζ ζ =
ν1
ν2
q
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
UVMS dynamics in matrix form
M(q)ζ +C(q, ζ)ζ +D(q, ζ)ζ + g(q,RIB) = τ
formally equal to a groundfixed industrial manipulator 1
however. . .
Model knowledge
Bandwidth of the sensor’s readings
Vehicle hovering control
Dynamic coupling between vehicle and manipulator
Kinematic redundancy of the system
1[Siciliano et al.(2009)Siciliano, Sciavicco, Villani, and Oriolo][Fossen(2002)] [Schjølberg and Fossen(1994)]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Dynamics
Movement of vehicle and manipulator coupled
movement of the vehicle carrying the manipulator
law of conservation of momentum
Need to coordinate
at velocity level ⇒ kinematic control
at torque level ⇒ dynamic control 2
2[McLain et al.(1996b)McLain, Rock, and Lee][McLain et al.(1996a)McLain, Rock, and Lee]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
A first kinematic solution
Assuming the vehicle in hovering is not the best strategy to e.e. finepositioning3, better to kinematically compensate with the manipulator
3[Hildebrandt et al.(2009)Hildebrandt, Christensen, Kerdels, Albiez, and Kirchner]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills
A robotic system is kinematically redundant when it possesses moredegrees of freedom than those required to execute a given task
Redundancy may be used to add additional tasks and to handlesingularities
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills
A robotic system is kinematically redundant when it possesses moredegrees of freedom than those required to execute a given task
Redundancy may be used to add additional tasks and to handlesingularities
main task
ηd, qd τ η, q
IKsecond. tasks
Control
offline planning not appropriate for unstructured environments
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -2-
Starting from a generic m-dimensional task
σ = f(η, q) ∈ Rm
it is required to invertσ = J(η, q)ζ
The configurations at which J ∈ Rm×6+n is rank deficient are
kinematic singularities
The mobility of the structure is reduced
Infinite solutions to the inverse kinematics problem might exist
Close to a kinematic singularity at small task velocities cancorrespond large joint velocities
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -3-
σ = Jζ inverted by solving proper optimization problems
Pseudoinverseζ = J †σ = JT
(JJT
)−1σ
Transpose-basedζ = JTσ
Weighted pseudoinverse
ζ = J†W
σ = W−1JT(JW−1JT
)−1σ
Damped Least-Squares
ζ = JT(JJT + λ2Im
)−1σ
need for closedloop also. . .
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
Handling several tasks4
Extended JacobianAdd additional (6 + n)−m constraints
h(η, q) = 0 with associated Jh
such that the problem is squared with
[σ
0
]=
[J
Jh
]ζ
4[Chiaverini et al.(2008)Chiaverini, Oriolo, and Walker]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
Augmented JacobianAn additional task is given
σh = h(η, q) with associated Jh
such that the problem is squared with
[σ
σh
]=
[J
Jh
]ζ
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
✛✚
✘✙
ζ
❘
✛✚
✘✙
σ
A mapping from the controlled variable to the task space
An inverse mapping is required
Additional tasks may be considered (e.g. task priority)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
✛✚
✘✙
ζ
❘
✛✚
✘✙
σ
✖✕✗✔
■
A mapping from the controlled variable to the task space
An inverse mapping is required
Additional tasks may be considered (e.g. task priority)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
✛✚
✘✙
ζ
❘
✛✚
✘✙
σ
✖✕✗✔
■ σa
✚✙✛✘
σb
✙
✖✕✗✔
✶
A mapping from the controlled variable to the task space
An inverse mapping is required
Additional tasks may be considered (e.g. task priority)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
Task priority redundancy resolution
σh = h(η, q) with associated Jh
further projected on the the null space of the higher priority one
ζ = J†σ +[Jh
(I − J †J
)]† (σh − JhJ
†σ)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
Singularity robust task priority redundancy resolution 5
σh = h(η, q) with associated Jh
further projected on the the null space of the higher priority one
ζ = J †σ +(I − J†J
)J†
hσh
5we are talking about algorithmic singularitieshere. . . [Chiaverini(1997)]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
AMADEUS
Agility task priority6
Task priority framework to handle both precision and set tasksEach task is the norm of the corresponding error (i.e., mi = 1)Recursive constrained least-squares within the set satisfyinghigher-priority tasks
6[Casalino et al.(2012)Casalino, Zereik, Simetti, Sperinde, and Turetta]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Kinematic control in pills -4-
Behavioral algorithms (behavior=task), bioinspired, artifical potentials
sensorsbehavior b
ζ2 ⊗
α2
behavior a
ζ1
supervisor
⊗
α1
behavior c
ζ3 ⊗
α3
∑ ζ
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Given 6 + n DOFs and m-dimensional tasks: End-effector
position, m = 3
pos./orientation, m = 6
distance from a target, m = 1
alignment with the line of sight, m = 2
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Manipulator joint-limits
several approaches proposed, m = 1 to n, e.g.
h(q) =
n∑
i=1
1
ci
qi,max − qi,min
(qi,max − qi)(qi − qi,min)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Drag minimization, m = 1 7
h(q) = DT(q, ζ)WD(q, ζ)
within a second order solution
ζ = J †(σ − Jζ
)− k
(I − J†J
)([ ∂h∂η∂h∂q
]+
∂h
∂ζ
)
7[Sarkar and Podder(2001)]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Manipulability/singularity, m = 1
h(q) =∣∣det
(JJT
)∣∣(In 8 priorities dynamically swapped between singularity and e.e.)
joints
inhibited direction
singularitysingularity
setclose to
8[Kim et al.(2002)Kim, Marani, Chung, and Yuh,Casalino and Turetta(2003)]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Restoring moments:
m = 3 keep close gravity-buoyancy of the overall system 9
m = 2 align gravity and buoyancy (SAUVIM is 4 tons) 10
f b
f g
τ 2
9[Han and Chung(2008)]10[Marani et al.(2010)Marani, Choi, and Yuh]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Obstacle avoidance m = 1
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Workspace-related variablesVehicle distance from the bottom, m = 1Vehicle distance from the target, m = 1
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Sensors configuration variables
Vehicle roll and pitch, m = 2Misalignment between the camera optical axis and the target lineof sight, m = 2
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Tasks to be controlled
Visual servoing variables
Features in the image plane 11
11[Mebarki et al.(2013)Mebarki, Lippiello, and Siciliano,Mebarki and Lippiello(in press, 2014)]
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Behavioral control in pills
Inspired from animal behavior
sensorsbehavior a
actuators
behavior bactuators
behavior cactuators
How to combine them in one single behavior?
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Behavioral control in pills
Inspired from animal behavior
sensorsbehavior a
actuators
behavior bactuators
behavior cactuators
How to combine them in one single behavior?
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Competitive behavioral control
Behaviors are in competitions and the higher priority can subsume thelower ones
sensorsbehavior b
v2
behavior av1
behavior cv3 vd
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Cooperative behavioral control
Behaviors cooperate and the priority is embedded in the gains
sensorsbehavior b
v2 ⊗
α2
behavior av1
supervisor
⊗
α1
behavior cv3 ⊗
α3
∑ vd
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB for robotic systems
A geometric-based approach: based on the null-space projection
Idea inherited from task priority inverse kinematics
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB control
Each action is decomposed in elementary behaviors/tasks
σ = f(p1, . . . ,pn)
σ =n∑
i=1
∂f(p)
∂pi
vi = J(p)v
motion reference command for each task
vd = J†(σd +Λσ
)σ = σd−σ
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Merging different tasks
NSB inherits the approach of the singularity-robust task priorityinverse kinematics technique
vd = J †a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸+ J
†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸primary secondary
Thus, defining:
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)Na =
(I − J †
aJa
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Merging different tasks
NSB inherits the approach of the singularity-robust task priorityinverse kinematics technique
vd = J †a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸+(I − J †
aJa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸J
†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸primary null space secondary
Thus, defining:
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)Na =
(I − J †
aJa
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Merging different tasks
NSB inherits the approach of the singularity-robust task priorityinverse kinematics technique
vd = J †a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸+(I − J †
aJa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸J
†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸primary null space secondary
Thus, defining:
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)Na =
(I − J †
aJa
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Merging different tasks
NSB inherits the approach of the singularity-robust task priorityinverse kinematics technique
vd = J †a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸+(I − J †
aJa
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸J
†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
︸ ︷︷ ︸primary null space secondary
Thus, defining:
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσa
)Na =
(I − J †
aJa
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσb
)
vd = va +Navb
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Three-task example
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσ1
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσ2
)
vc = J†c
(σc,d +Λcσ3
)
Successive projection approach
Na =(I − J †
aJa
)
N b =(I − J
†bJ b
)
vd = va +Navb +NaN bvc
Augmented projection approach
Jab =
[Ja
J b
]
Nab =(In − J
†abJab
)
vd = va +Navb+Nabvc
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Three-task example
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσ1
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσ2
)
vc = J†c
(σc,d +Λcσ3
)
Successive projection approach
Na =(I − J †
aJa
)
N b =(I − J
†bJ b
)
vd = va +Navb +NaN bvc
Augmented projection approach
Jab =
[Ja
J b
]
Nab =(In − J
†abJab
)
vd = va +Navb+Nabvc
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
NSB: Three-task example
va = J†a
(σa,d +Λaσ1
)
vb = J†b
(σb,d +Λbσ2
)
vc = J†c
(σc,d +Λcσ3
)
Successive projection approach
Na =(I − J †
aJa
)
N b =(I − J
†bJ b
)
vd = va +Navb +NaN bvc
Augmented projection approach
Jab =
[Ja
J b
]
Nab =(In − J
†abJab
)
vd = va +Navb+Nabvc
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
From behaviors to actions
sensing/perception
elementary behaviors actions
commands
supervisor
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: move to goal with obstacleavoidance
obstacle avoidance
σ1 = ‖p− po‖ ∈ R
σ1,d = d
J1 = rT ∈ R1×2
r =p− po
‖p− po‖
v1 = J†1λ1 (d− ‖p−po‖)
N (J1) = I − J†1J1 = I − rrT
move to goal
σ2 = p ∈ R2
σ2,d = pg
J2 = I ∈ R2×2
v2 = Λ2
(pg − p
)
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: competitive approach
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: competitive approach
❆❆❆❆❆❯
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: competitive approach
❄
only obstacle avoidance
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: competitive approach
❄
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: cooperative approach
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: cooperative approach
❆❆❆❆❯
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: cooperative approach
❇❇❇❇◆
linear combination: higher task is corrupted
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: cooperative approach
❄
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: NSB
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: NSB
❆❆❆❆❯
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: NSB
❇❇❇◆
nullspaceprojection: higher task is fulfilled
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Simple comparison: NSB
❄
only movetogoal
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Gain tuning
Cooperative
task a b c
situation 1 α1,1 α1,2 α1,3
sit. 2 α2,1 α2,2 α2,3
sit. 3 α3,1 α3,2 α3,3
sit. 4 α4,1 α4,2 α4,3
NSB
Each behavior tuned as if it was alone butin each situation the priority needs to be designed
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Gain tuning
Cooperative
task a b c d
situation 1 α1,1 α1,2 α1,3 α1,4
sit. 2 α2,1 α2,2 α2,3 α2,4
sit. 3 α3,1 α3,2 α3,3 α3,4
sit. 4 α4,1 α4,2 α4,3 α4,4
NSB
Each behavior tuned as if it was alone butin each situation the priority needs to be designed
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Gain tuning
Cooperative
task a b c
situation 1 α1,1 α1,2 α1,3
sit. 2 α2,1 α2,2 α2,3
sit. 3 α3,1 α3,2 α3,3
sit. 4 α4,1 α4,2 α4,3
NSB
Each behavior tuned as if it was alone butin each situation the priority needs to be designed
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Stability analysis
Lyapunov function12
V (σ) = 1
2σTσ > 0 where σ =
[σT
a σT
b σT
c
]T
V = −σT
Ja
Jb
Jc
v = −σTMσ = −σ
T
Λa Oma,mbOma,mc
JbJ†aΛa JbNaJ
†bΛb JbNJ
†cΛc
JcJ†aΛa JcNaJ
†bΛb JcNJ
†cΛc
σ
12[Antonelli(2009)]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Stability results
V < 0 depending on the mutual relationships among the Jacobians:
dependent
ρ(J †x) + ρ(J †
y) > ρ([J†x J†
y
])
independent
ρ(J †x) + ρ(J †
y) = ρ([J†x J†
y
])
orthogonal
JxJ†y = Omx×my
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
(Dis)advantages
PROS
Priorities strictly satisfiedAnalitical convergence resultsEasiest gain tuningClear handling of the DOFsCompetitive and cooperative as particular cases
CONS
Couples all the behaviorsImpedance control not possible
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
However. . .
End effector going out of the workspace and one (eventually weighted)task always leads to singularity
❅❅❅❘
manipulator stretched
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Balance movement between vehicle and manipulator
Need to distribute the motion e.g.:
move mainly the manipulator when target in workspace
move the vehicle when approaching the workspace boundaries
move the vehicle for large displacement
Some solutions, among them dynamic programming or fuzzy logic
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Fuzzy logic to balance the movement13
Within a weighted pseudoinverse framework
J†W
= W−1JT(JW−1JT
)−1W−1(β) =
[(1− β)I6 O6×n
On×6 βIn
]
with β ∈ [0, 1] output of a fuzzy inference engineSecondary tasks activated by additional fuzzy variables αi ∈ [0, 1]
ζ = J†W
(xE,d +KEeE) +(I − J
†W
JW
)(∑
i
αiJ†s,iws,i
)
Only one αi active at onceNeed to be complete, distinguishable, consistent and compactBeyond the dichotomy fuzzy/probability theory very effective intransferring ideas
13[Antonelli and Chiaverini(2003)]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Dynamic programming to balance the movement14
Freeze, as a free parameter, the vehicle velocity ν and implementthe agility task priority to the sole manipulator ⇒ qd
Freeze the manipulator velocity qd and then find the vehiclevelocity νd needed for the remaining tasks components notsatisfied ⇒ ζd
ν
νe
14[Casalino et al.(2012)Casalino, Zereik, Simetti, Sperinde, and Turetta]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Dynamic programming to balance the movement14
Freeze, as a free parameter, the vehicle velocity ν and implementthe agility task priority to the sole manipulator ⇒ qd
Freeze the manipulator velocity qd and then find the vehiclevelocity νd needed for the remaining tasks components notsatisfied ⇒ ζd
ν
νe
14[Casalino et al.(2012)Casalino, Zereik, Simetti, Sperinde, and Turetta]Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Dynamic control
Classical vs modular approaches (both compatible with NSB)
main task
ηd, qd τ η, q
IKsecond. tasks
Control
Classical model-based
natural extension ofwell-known control laws
adaptive and robustversions
Virtual decomposition
modular ⇒ same controllaw for all rigid bodies
adaptive ⇒ integral-likeaction
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Virtual Decomposition in a nutshell
based on Newton-Euler formulation
forward propagation of kinematicerrors assuming 6 DOFs
ν1
ν2
backward computation and projectionof control forces/torques
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
VD: forward propagation, from base to e.e.
6-DOF kinematicerrors νi ∈ R
6
each link consideredas a 6 DOFs body
νi
νi+1
qi+1
propagation
forward
νi+1i+1
= U iT
i+1νii + qi+1z
i+1i
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
VD: backward propagation, from e.e. to base
6-DOF generalizedcontrol forceshc ∈ R
6 hi
hi+1τi
propagation
backward
hic,i = Y
(Ri,ν
ii,ν
ir,i, ν
ir,i
)θi +Kv,is
ii +U i
i+1hi+1c,i+1
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
VD: cooperative control
1 Forward propagation until the object
2 Object control forces for the movement+internal
3 Forces projected to the link n of the two robots
4 Backward propagation
hc,o
hc,n+1 hc,n+1
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Numerical simulation: underwater6-DOF vehicle + 6-DOF manipulator
Reach a pre-grasp configuration in terms of end-effector position andorientation
initial configuration
priority-1 task: e.e. configuration
priority-2 task: vehicle roll+pitch
priority-3 task: position of joint 2
only e.e. ⇒
complete solution ⇒
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Numerical simulation:cooperative transportation of a bar
The final objective for ARCAS
kinematics-only
no perception problems
switch among actions
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
First HW tests
Tests made in Seville, November 2013
vehicle controller not implemented
task: e.e. position+orientation
simple e.e. hold
no priority yet
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Additional HW tests
Tests made in Seville, February 2014
vehicle controller to be tuned/improved
vehicle obstacle avoidance
e.e. + arm reconfiguration
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Outline
Introduction
Modeling
Inverse Kinematics
A possible kinematic/behavioral solution: NSB
A possible dynamic solution: Virtual decomposition
Simulation/experiments
Perspectives
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Perspectives: the underactuated case
Motivated by quadrotors control
Roll and pitch functional to the horizontalmovement ⇒ kinematic disturbances!
pitch
end effector
Uncontrolled DOF affect the tasks
Possible to handle in a task-priority approach?
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Perspectives: Null base reaction forces
Dynamic model
[Mv M12
MT12 M q
] [ν
q
]+
[f c,v
f c,q
]+
[fg,v
f g,q
]=
[τ v
τ q
]
for the sole vehicle:
Mvν +M12q + f c,v︸ ︷︷ ︸try to zeroing
+fg,v = τ v,
achievable with:q = −M
†12f c,v + Nqo︸ ︷︷ ︸
yet another null space. . .
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Perspectives: arm’s motors not controllable in torque
Several manipulators on the market equipped with position/velocityfeedback control loopsNeed to design a proper controller for the sole vehicle
Partially coupled model
Iterative formulation
Adaptive
Simplest version: only gravity
Mvν +M 12q + f c,v + f g,v = τ v,
compensate only for f g,v
h00=Y (0)·θ0+U
01
(
Y (1) · θ1 + U12h
22
)
+. . .=[
Y (0) U01Y (1) U
01U
12Y (2) . . . U
01U
12 . . .Un−1
nY (n)
]
︸ ︷︷ ︸
Y
θ0θ1θ2
.
.
.
θn
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Thanks for the attention
The presented results are the outcome of the work of several
colleagues from the University of Cassino, the Consortium ISME
and PRISMA, the projects ARCAS and MARIS
Filippo Arrichiello, Khelifa Baizid, Elisabetta Cataldi, Stefano Chiaverini,
Amal Meddahi
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography I
G. Antonelli.
Stability analysis for prioritized closed-loop inverse kinematic algorithms forredundant robotic systems.
IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 25(5):985–994, October 2009.
G. Antonelli.
Underwater robots.
Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, D, 3rdedition, January 2014.
G. Antonelli and S. Chiaverini.
Fuzzy redundancy resolution and motion coordination for underwatervehicle-manipulator systems.
IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 11(1):109–120, 2003.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography II
G. Casalino and A. Turetta.
Coordination and control of multiarm, nonholonomic mobile manipulators.
In Proceedings IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots andSystems, pages 2203–2210, Las Vegas, NE, Oct. 2003.
G. Casalino, E. Zereik, E. Simetti, S. Torelli A. Sperinde, and A. Turetta.
Agility for underwater floating manipulation: Task & subsystem priority basedcontrol strategy.
In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots andSystems, Vilamoura, PT, october 2012.
S. Chiaverini.
Singularity-robust task-priority redundancy resolution for real-time kinematiccontrol of robot manipulators.
IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 13(3):398–410, 1997.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography III
S. Chiaverini, G. Oriolo, and I. D. Walker.
Springer Handbook of Robotics, chapter Kinematically RedundantManipulators, pages 245–268.
B. Siciliano, O. Khatib, (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, D, 2008.
T.I. Fossen.
Marine Control Systems: Guidance, Navigation and Control of Ships, Rigs andUnderwater Vehicles.
Marine Cybernetics, Trondheim, Norway, 2002.
J. Han and W.K. Chung.
Coordinated motion control of underwater vehicle-manipulator system withminimizing restoring moments.
In Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2008. IROS 2008. IEEE/RSJ InternationalConference on, pages 3158–3163. IEEE, 2008.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography IV
M. Hildebrandt, L. Christensen, J. Kerdels, J. Albiez, and F. Kirchner.
Realtime motion compensation for ROV-based tele-operated underwatermanipulators.
In IEEE OCEANS 2009-Europe, pages 1–6, 2009.
J. Kim, G. Marani, WK Chung, and J. Yuh.
Kinematic singularity avoidance for autonomous manipulation in underwater.
Proceedings of PACOMS, 2002.
G. Marani, S.K. Choi, and J. Yuh.
Real-time center of buoyancy identification for optimal hovering in autonomousunderwater intervention.
Intelligent Service Robotics, 3(3):175–182, 2010.
T.W. McLain, S.M. Rock, and M.J. Lee.
Coordinated control of an underwater robotic system.
In Video Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Roboticsand Automation, pages 4606–4613, 1996a.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography V
T.W. McLain, S.M. Rock, and M.J. Lee.
Experiments in the coordinated control of an underwater arm/vehicle system.
Autonomous robots, 3(2):213–232, 1996b.
R. Mebarki and V. Lippiello.
Image-based control for aerial manipulation.
Asian Journal of Control, in press, 2014.
R. Mebarki, V. Lippiello, and B. Siciliano.
Exploiting image moments for aerial manipulation control.
In ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Conference, Palo Alto, CA, USA,2013.
N. Sarkar and T.K. Podder.
Coordinated motion planning and control of autonomous underwatervehicle-manipulator systems subject to drag optimization.
Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of, 26(2):228–239, 2001.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014
Bibliography VI
I. Schjølberg and T. Fossen.
Modelling and control of underwater vehicle-manipulator systems.
In in Proc. 3rd Conf. on Marine Craft maneuvering and control, pages 45–57,Southampton, UK, 1994.
B. Siciliano, L. Sciavicco, L. Villani, and G. Oriolo.
Robotics: modelling, planning and control.
Springer Verlag, 2009.
Gianluca Antonelli Palermo, 27 february 2014