Date post: | 29-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | amber-sanders |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Convergence of PracticeMerging library, archive, and
museum collections management within EMu
KE EMu User Conference, 17 October 2012
Pooja Budhraja, Brian Wilson – The Henry Ford
• Dedicated in 1929; opened to public in 1933
• Five primary units:• Museum and Village• Imax Theater and Assembly Plant Tour• Benson Ford Research Center
• Houses the Archives and Library
• 1.5M onsite visitors per year • 1200-1500 employees and 650 volunteers• $50M yearly operating budget
Archives and Library• 9 FT and 4 PT staff; 6-10 volunteers• 2500 onsite researchers per year• 2500 remote reference requests per year
History and Operation
2
Collections
Museum and Village• Rosa Parks Bus; Wright Cycle Shop
Archives• Over 18,000 cu. ft. (6400 linear ft.)• Ford Motor Co. records, 1903-1950s• Henry Ford personal papers• Trade Catalog collection• Institutional records
Library• Over 43,000 book titles• Over 2000 periodical titles• Open to public; non-circulating
3
Making Connections
4
Working Together
5
Digital LAM Project
• Three Phases• Establish broad “wants/needs”• Create/import archival description within EMu• Revise delivery interfaces
• Representation from Program Management, Registrars, IT, and Archives
• Place archival items in collection context• Reduce initial amount of individual description required
• Provide information about collections without digitized content• Enable public search across store of archival description• Increase velocity of digitization
6
EMuEMu
Internal Users External Users
Fire
wal
l
7
Progress to Date
• Converted 900+ hardcopy inventories to pdf format• Work done under prior external grant
• Established core project team• Implemented EMu Test environment• Created local Archivists’ Toolkit instance• Constructed Metadata and Field cross-walks
• In process of resolving shared fields
• Tested EAD import and XSLT• Modified EAD template and customized XSLT
• Begun creation of example archival collection in EMu
8
Record Structure and EAD Import
Accession
Collection
Series I <c01>
Series II <c01>
File <c02>
File <c02>
Item <c03>
Item <c03>
Multimedia
Multimedia
csv import
template or csv import
ead import
manual
9
Parent/ChildAttachment
10
Accession 232, World’s Fair Photograph series
• Created using EAD import, record templates, and csv file imports
• 5516 records• Collection level: 1• Component level: 202• Item level: 1771• Multimedia: 3542
• Not fully digitized (~40%)• Complete archival description
Accession 232, World’s Fair Photograph series
11
Ford Motor Company Records StructureFMC Collection
Photographs RG
Engineering Photographic
Photographic Department
Accession 232, World’s Fair series
General series
Industrial Relations RG
FMC Archives
RG No. 2 through No. 19
12
Plant Construction series
Renovated Assembly Plants series
Northern MI Operations series
Ford Rotunda series
Ford News Bureau series
Photographic Library series
Photographs RG:
• 16 accessions
• ~ 500,000 photographs
• ~ 1M digital images
What We Are Finding
• Differing professional practices
• Local practices of The Henry Ford
• EMu practices and implementation
13
Differing Professional Practices
• Archival provenance, context, and collection• Description at an aggregate level – “Are things findable?”• Granularization of data – removal of context
• Terminology – common / disparate terms• Archival hierarchy - Similar to Village/Districts/Buildings/Rooms?• Location – Intellectual and physical• EAD and CDWA (metadata) relative to DACS and CCO (description)
• Archivist use of multiple date ranges for single entity• Example: Inclusive and Bulk Date ranges for collection
• Differing EAD best practices• <unitdate> within <unittitle> or separated
14
Local Practices of The Henry Ford
• Terminology and Meaning• “Item-Level Cataloging”• Content versus Structure – Defining title field versus form of title
• Object ID requirement for object records• Application to archival intellectual-level components• Added “-X” suffix to collection ID for <c>’s
• Location• Granularity of data – Collection shelf range and/or specific box/folder
• ObjectType field• Defines item or catalog record? Or both?
• Using cross-walks to define “shared” fields• Title defined in Main Title field as concat of <unittitle> and <unitdate>• Extent written to Measurements tab • Dates captured on Creation/Date tab
15
16
Date Example:Ford Motorsports Records, 1957-1968 (bulk 1963-1967)
Bulk dates entered as additional dates here to commonize with Registrars practice.
[EAD] Component tabCreation/Date tab
Inclusive dates only written to fields here.
EMu Practices and Implementation
• Handling of multiple date ranges for single item/entity• No bulk date field(s)
• Lack of container field• Writing box/folder data to Physical Facet field temporarily
• Function of Archives “Tree”• Visibility; drag/drop; position control
• Subject / Controlled Access term import• Tied to Parties Module; creation of duplicate records
• Other Parties Module fields• Accession, Finding Aid Author, Revision By, etc.
• Duplicate fields across multiple tabs• Suppress/hide three of seven tabs• Mixing of data about collection and data about collection description
17
What’s Next
Short Term• Continue build-out of sample archival collection within EMu
• Focus on resolving shared fields such as Title and Date• Develop output formats
• Finding aid form and EAD XML• Handling of Library collection data – Discovery not management
• Reuse/transform/import existing MARC record data• Use of Related Objects to connect collections and items
Long Term• Public and internal facing website redesigns• Explore potential use of narratives module
• Collection level description (scope, bioghist, etc.)• Review of item-level metadata
• Can we define a “light” record for publication?
18
Contact:
Thank You.
19
Pooja BudhrajaDatabase ManagerThe Henry [email protected]
Brian WilsonDigital Processing ArchivistArchives and Library, The Henry [email protected]: @brilwil