Cooper Drum Superfund SiteCooper Drum Superfund SiteInterview for Project Coordinator
Prepared for:
Cooper Drum PRP Group
Presented by:
Ian A. WebsterProject Navigator, Ltd.October 27, 2009
Project Navigator, Ltd. www.projectnavigator.com
Project Navigator Continually Promotes a Project Health and Safety Culture
Patrick Bayou Superfund SiteDeer Park, TX
T t l 2007
PNL employs a behavioral-based safety system
Total 2007
~ 13,000 Hours ~ 6000 Hours
0 Injuries 0 Injuries
LTI 0 LTI 0
Near Misses 0 Near Misses 0y y
Ascon Landfill SiteHuntington Beach, CA
2004 to date (10/15)
Hours Worked 5,776
Waste Disposal, Inc.Santa Fe Springs, CA
2004 to date (10/15)
Recon Hours Worked 27,962
PNL adopts and actively uses a behavioral-based strategy to minimize loss. The system reaps benefits by reducing personal injury, addressing safety problems and by eliminating business inefficiencies.
Tenets of Operational Excellence Safety Management ProgramOSHA Recordable Injuries 0
OSHA Recordable Rate 0.00
Lost Time Incidents 0
Near Misses 2
Subcontractor Hours Worked 5,040
OSHA Recordable Injuries 0
OSHA Recordable Rate 0.00
Lost Work Day Injuries 0
Near Misses 3
Tenets of Operational Excellence
1. Always operate within design or environmental limits.
2. Always operate in a safe and controlled condition.
3. Always ensure that safety devices are in place and functioning.
4. Always follow safe work practices and procedures.
Safety Management Program
1. Written program
2. Training
3. Daily toolbox and subcontractor coordination meetings
4. Perform Job Hazard Analysis before performing the work
5. Self assessment: Assess the risk, Analyze how to reduce the risk, and Act to ensure
Operating Industries, Inc.Monterey Park, CA
> One million hours worked
Tex Tin Superfund SiteTexas City, TX
2001 to 2004
5. Always meet or exceed client’s requirements.
6. Always maintain integrity of dedicated systems.
7. Always comply with all applicable rules and regulations.
8. Always address abnormal conditions.
9. Always follow written procedures for high-risk or unusual situations.
how to reduce the risk, and Act to ensure safe operations
6. Near Miss Reporting
7. Incident investigation, corrective action follow-up, and reporting back to employees
8. Subcontractor preselection: Only work with those who have a safety program and statistics to prove their success
9. Every person on site is given Stop Work Authority
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
with no lost time. > 80,000 hours worked with no lost time.
10. Always involve the right people in decisions that affect procedures and equipment.
10. If it isn’t safe, don’t do it
Ian Webster and PNL are Excited About the Opportunity
Why PNL and Ian Webster• Managed 10 major similar sites in Los Angeles
• Experience and judgment• Experience and judgment
• Cost and schedule controls
• Strategy development
• Regulatory relationships
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Where PNL’s Project Coordination Services Add Value and Save Money
Project Navigator works to manage, align, and coordinate project resources for more cost effecti e project e ec tionmore cost-effective project execution.
Strategic
n-m
akin
g
PRPClients
f Dec
isio
n
TacticalTraditional Environmental
Deg
ree
of Project EPC Resources
D
Labor-Hours Applied to Project
Task-driven
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Labor-Hours Applied to Project
Cooper Drum Superfund Site Logistics and Group Management Situational Assessment
U S EPAU.S. EPA
Direction; Expectations
Cooper Drum U S EPA
U.S. EPA Communications
Right-sized U.S. EPA Communications
Cooper DrumGroup
Selectand Empower PNL as Project
Coordinator
Increase
U.S. EPA Communications
Engineering (AMEC)Inputs from Group
• Mission clarityCoordinator(Ian A.
Webster)
ed cost eff
y• Day to day
coachingOutputs
• Technically rigorous work
Work Product
fectiveness
rigorous work product
• Cost avoidance opportunities
• Data interpretation sinterpretation
• Remedial options• Cost and
schedule forecasts
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Project Navigator, Ltd.’s Core Business is Project Coordination
• Houston TX• Pleasant Hill CA• Brea CA • Raleigh NC• Malvern PA
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Houston, TX(713) 468-5004
Pleasant Hill, CA(925) 969-9574
Brea, CA(714) 388-1800Project Navigator has five main offices.
Raleigh, NC(919) 539-1928
Malvern, PA(610) 251-6851
Ian Webster and PNL’s Representative CERCLA Experience in Southern California
DTSC Glendale Glendale, CA
SEMOUSouth El Monte, CA
To Purity OilFresno, CA• Cap and GW PC management
• Established landfill relationships
• Remediation cost estimating for a PRP group
Operating Industries, Inc.Monterey Park, CA• Management of New Cure Inc.
from 1997 to 2006• Managed all aspects of
$100MM landfill closure workAd i NP d l t
BKK Landfill SiteWest Covina, CA• PNL is PRPs PM• Manage LF gas control, cap
maintenance, compliance, City relationshipsCharnock Sub-basin
Culver City, CA• West’s largest MtBE
GW impacts
Omega Chemical Superfund Site
Del Amo Superfund Site McColl Superfund Site
• Advisor on NP redevelopment Project Navigator, Ltd.Brea, CA
Los Angeles BasinChapin Road LandfillMontebello, CA• Phase II Brownfields
Environmental Site Assessment and Analysis
GW impacts
C D S f d Sit
Whittier, CA• Delineation of GW
plume
Cal Compact Landfill SiteCarson CA
Del Amo Superfund SiteTorrance, CA• RCRA equivalent cap• Community issues
McColl Superfund SiteFullerton, CA• Managed complex cap and cut
off wall closure• Significant community relations
issues• Site now in reuse as part of a golf
course
Waste Disposal, Inc.Santa Fe Springs, CA• PNL has been PM since 1997 • RCRA and Earthen caps• Turn-key PRP group coordination
services• PNL strategies avoided expensive
excavation remedies
Cooper Drum Superfund Site
Carson, CA• PNL retained as landfill dynamics and
degradation expert
• Excellent safety record
Ascon Landfill SiteHuntington Beach, CA• PNL serves as oil company group PM• Complex remedy selection process with DTSC• Manage consulting resources and all field programs• Instituted a “safety first working atmosphere”
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
PNL’s Project Coordination Services at Multi-Party Sites
I f ti M t & P liti l S
Consultant Oversight; Construction Management
Information Mgmt. & Data Analysis
Political Savvy, Diplomacy, Relationships Multi-party PRP Project
Management
Project Advocacy Agency Reporting
Tasking, Scheduling, Action Item Control
Strategy Development, Options Creation
Cooper Drum PRP Group
Group Funds Management, Financial Controls Liaising with
Common Counsel Client Technical Interaction
Community Relations and NGO Management
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Project Coordination Services for Cooper Drum: PNL Can Operate on a Sliding Scale of Proactivity
Revisit RD work
4
Effo
rt
Revisit RD work Potentially change
RA phasing or design
Prepare RFPs and assist Group in
Proactively engage with U S EPA2
r Lev
el o
f
3
Receive and assess data findings (small)
pretaining RA resources
Provide project coordination support to Group to control SOW
with U.S. EPA Receive and assess
data findings (large) Formulate
interpretations Prepare “best quality”
1
2
Coo
rdin
ato
• Basic group coordination & communication
• Status teleconferences
• Manage RD/RA
g ( ) Comment on work
products and data Create an
administrative record
control SOW, schedule and cost
p q ycommon denominator presentations
Develop relationships to group’s benefitPr
ojec
t C
Manage RD/RA efforts Devise and maintain
a strategy
Basic Operation Increasing Proactivity
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
1. ARNCO
2. BELL FOUNDRY CO
3. BLACKBURN TRUCK LINES
58
2112 18
Cooper Drum: VOC Plumes and EDR Information
4. CARTER CASTING CO INC
5. CENTERLESS RPR INC
6. CITY OF SOUTH GATE
7. COOPER DRUM COMPANY
8. CULWELL BROTHERS INC
9. DIAL CORPORATION
17
320
21
1915 Jervis B. Webb Co.
10. DOMAR PRECISION INC
11. EDSON INDUSTRIES
12. GATEWAY BUSINESS FORMS
13. HI-TECH SEATING PRODUCTS KUSTOM FIT
14. INK MAKERS INC
15. JERVIS B. WEBB CO
13
Kustom Fit
Piazza Trucking Inc.
16. LAUSD/MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS J
17. NATIONAL READY MIX CONCRETE CO
18. REISNER METALS
19. SHULTZ STEEL COMPANY SSC
20. SPANN’S GEAR AND MACHINE CO
21. WEBB FIRESTONE BLVD PROPERTY
4
149
22. WR GRACE & CO CONST PROD DIV
Proposed or Already in NPL
Sites with UST leaks
LEGEND
7
22
Groundwater Flow Direction
Site Boundary
Plume
11210
16
Seam Master Ind. N
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
150 yds
EPA’s Proposed Remedyp yGroundwater Management via Treatment (In and Ex Situ) and Containment
In-Situ Chemical Injection Well
1E4 ppb
Oxidation Wells
Bio Treatment Wall (ERD)
j
GAC Treatment System
1E3 ppb
1E2 ppb
10 bn Sc
ale
Groundwater Extraction Wells
@ 20 gpm10 ppb
1 ppb
0.1 ppb
TCE
Conc
entra
tion
0.01 ppb
0.001 ppb
T
Selected Remedy for Groundwater (ROD, 2002)• Extract groundwater contaminated with VOCs and treat it using liquid-phase activated carbon in vessels at an on-site treatment
system. Containment will be provided at the downgradient extent of contamination.• The treated water will be reinjected into the contaminated groundwater aquifer or discharged to the public sewer system operated j g q g p y p
by the Los Angeles County Sanitation District. Reinjection will reduce the intrusion of and the potential for mixing with other off-site VOC plumes.
• Use in situ chemical treatment, either reductive dechlorination or chemical oxidation, to enhance remediation of VOC-contaminated groundwater. During the remedial design (RD) phase, conduct treatability studies to evaluate both methods and determine which works best phase to further define the downgradient extent of the VOC contamination.
• Conduct groundwater monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedy the location of the plume and that remediation
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
• Conduct groundwater monitoring to evaluate the effectiveness of the remedy, the location of the plume, and that remediation goals have been met.
Cooper Drum SitePNL Can Assist the Group with Strategic Thinking
43
EPA-Selected RemedyRemedial Action –Small/Medium/Large Options
1
EPA-selected remedy:
OU-1 (GW): Pump and Treat, ISCO, PRBem
edy
2
OU-2 (soils) Installation of PRB
Soils w/ GW Contingency
Soils w/ GW Barrier Wall
OU-2 (soils)
OU-2 (Soils): DPE, Excavation and disposal, ICs
Scop
e of
Re
OU-2 (soils) Monitor existing
GW network to see how COCs react (5 yrs.+) placed wells to monitor 3-D
Installation of PRB downgradient to prevent further migration of GW plume
Monitor GW to
Soils Only
Monitor existing GW network to see how COCs react
S to monitor 3-D plume boundaries
If plume is stable, continue monitoring
If plume is
see how COCs react
Small Large
expanding, re-design OU-1 based on new data
Medium
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Cooper Drum: “Risk-Based” Project Phasing
Current EPA-recommended remedy phasing consists of:NOTES
10
y p gSoil Vapor Dual Phase ExtractionGroundwater Source Area RemediationGroundwater Downgradient RemediationSoil Excavation, Disposal, and ICs
An alternate route, focused on risk reduction, consists of:S il E ti d Off Sit Di l
NOTES
OU-2: Soils
ve)
Excavate shallow soil ($950K)
SVE of intermediate soil beneath structures
Soil Excavation and Off-Site DisposalSoil Vapor Dual Phase Extraction followed by ICsGroundwater Source Area RemediationGroundwater Downgradient Remediation
See graph for qualitative plot of remedial t i k ti
sk(Q
ualit
ativ
5($2.2 MM)
OU-1: Groundwater
component risk versus time
Ris
DPE of perched aquifer Treatment
groundwater plume ($6.0 MM)
1
02 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 300
Time (Years)
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Time (Years)
Cooper Drum: Schedule Analysis and Strategic Implications
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
PC Fundamentals No. 1:
STATEMENT FLOW
Cost Control and Account Management
StatementsBank Checking AcctSavings Account
Project CoordinatorAccounting FirmP j t C lSavings Account Project CounselCommittee Chairs
INVOICE FLOW
InvoicesTransfer
Project CoordinatorReview and RecommendationCoding Prepare A thori ation
Submit to BankCheck Cut / Transfer
INVOICE FLOW
Coding, Prepare Authorization C ec Cut / a s e
SC Approval and signature2 Sig required > $10,000
Monitor Balances, Reporting to Project Coordinator, Accountant
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
PC Fundamentals No. 2:
Opportunities for “Remedy Modifications” are Still Possible at Cooper Drum
Ability to “Drive Change” Varies with Project Phase.
Change = Scopes of Work; EPA declarations or remedy (e.g. PP,ROD); Risk Definition
Public Interpretation of
y
Ability to ff
Public comment period
Interpretation of responsiveness summary
Effect “Change”
EPA EPA EPA/PRP
EPA/PRP
EPA/PRP
EPA EPA PRPs Typically
NPL PSA RI RiskAssess-ment
FS PP ROD RD RA OM&M/ICs
Ownership
*
PROJECT PHASE* All time phases are shown as equal for graphical depiction
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
PC Fundamentals No. 2:
Decision Tree for Post-ROD The Type of Scope Change Determines How the Post ROD Change is Documented
EPA-Designated Levels of Post-ROD Changes
Figure 8-1Process to Address Post-ROD Significant Changes
INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM
ChangesPost-ROD Change is Documented
RECEIVED FROM PUBLIC OR SUPPORT
AGENCY
DOES ITWARRANT FORMAL “CONSIDERATION”
BY LEADAGENCY?**
atio
n
YES NO
LEAD AGENCY PLACES
INFORMATION IN POST-DECISION DOCUMENT FILE
DOESINFORMATION
LEAD TO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES?
Doc
umen
ta
ROD Amendment
YES NO
LEAD AGENCY MUST ISSUE EITHER:
• EXPLANATION OF SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES; OR
• NEW PROPSOED PLAN AND ROD AMENDMENT
LEAD AGENCY MUST:• FORMALLY REPSOND; AND• PLACE DOCUMENT IN
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD FILE
Leve
l of D
Explanation of Significant
Differences (ESD) S b i i
**NOTE:• DO THE COMMENTS CONTAIN SIGNIFICANT INFORMATION?• IS THE INFORMATION NOT AVAILABLE IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE
RECORD?• COULD THE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTD DURING THE
COMMENT PERIOD?• DOES THE INFORMATION SUBSTANTIALLY SUPPORT THE NEED TO
ALTER THE RESPONSE ACTION?
Minor Significant FundamentalType of Post-ROD change
Project Filing Submission
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Reference: EPA Guidancey g
PC Fundamentals No. 3:Project Advocacy: PNL Can Efficiently Mine and j y yAssist in the Presentation of Project Information
Complex technical projects generate large amounts of data
These concepts must be communicated in a
PNL’s GIS and visual interpretations allow data to
When people understand, they make better, faster
and information that need to be analyzed and explained to stakeholders.
succinct and clear manner.
become clear, concise and understandable.
decisions.
Example: PNL SCM created for Cooper Drum
Before After
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Before After
PC Fundamentals No. 4: PNL is Expert at Working with PRPs to Develop Project Strategies
NEWARK BAY STUDY AREAA Slidi S l f
EAST COAST CERCLA SITE: CONFIDENTIAL CLIENTHelping PRPs Devise a Data-Driven Remedy
A Sliding Scale of Options HistogramProject Navigator, Ltd. has a track record of working with PRP groups to "right size" our management and technical efforts to suit the magnitude of the tasks in hand.
COX ROAD LANDFILL
Selection StrategyAt a major sediments impacted CERCLA site, with multiple OUs, PNL is working on developing a remedy selection approach which is logically derived from the site data and prior operating history.
Remedy optionsPNL routinely helps PRP groups devise a sliding scale of remedial options, based on data findings and the strategic need to define alternatives with different costs and effects.
TEX TIN SUPERFUND SITEContracting ApproachesPNL is expert at adopting different resource retention contracting approaches to match the project's PNL
OII LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITE
demands. Approaches range from series-tasks to integrated design-build. Develops
Project Strategies
OII LANDFILL SUPERFUND SITEGas CompliancePNL staff recognize that the PRPs ultimate goal at any site is to achieve "regulatory compliance" as cost-effectively, and safely, as possible. At one of the west coast's most costly sites, PNL is helping the PRPs devise a long-term operational plan to run the site at lower costs.
PATRICK BAYOU SUPERFUND SITEMinimizing Cost and Uncertainty of a Full-scale BERA/HHA at a Sediment Site
WASTE DISPOSAL, INC. LANDFILLReducing OM&MPNL has devised many low cost methodologies for performing long-term site OM&M, while proving that the remedies are functioning, and compliance is being achieved.
run the site at lower costs. Alternative, streamlined approach proposed to
regulators Approach will reduce time and cost as
compared to full BERA/HHA Utilize data from existing sites and transfer
effects data to Patrick Bayou Collect certain site-specific data to adjust risk State-of-science approach required us to
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
pp qprovide training for regulating team
PC Fundamentals No. 5: Tools for the Project Coordinator to Facilitate in Improved AlignmentUnderstanding drives confidence and improved risk-basked decision-makingPNL’s systems include:PNL s systems include:1. Site Conceptual Models:
Explanation figures for project advocacy
2. Projectoolbox.com• Routine file management• Invoice review and
approvals
3. PNLprojects.com• Geospatial click and view
system• Files, photos, and videos
• Cash flow management • Keyword search• http://www.prpblog.com/cooperdrum/
grid.htm
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
ConclusionWhy Choose Project Navigator, Ltd? Local Experienced Experienced
● Ian has more than 20 years of PC experience Known Entity to Many Group Members
St t i Thi k d C ti P bl S l Strategic Thinkers and Creative Problem Solvers Focus on the Management of Project Risk Technical Advocates Regulatory Relationships (EPA, DTSC, RWQCB, LASAND) Technical Negotiators and Advocates Understanding of PC Roleg
● PNL will coach and help improve AMEC’s performance and work product. (We will not compete with AMEC).
Alignment of MissionAlignment of Mission● My performance metric is to save PNL’s project fees many (10?) times
over Online Tools for Improved Communications and Performance
October 27, 2009Cooper Drum Superfund Site PC Interview, South Gate, CA
Online Tools for Improved Communications and Performance
Th k Y / Q tiThank You / Questions
Contact Other Resources
Project Navigator, Ltd.1 Pointe Drive, Suite 320Brea, CA 92821T 714 388 1800
Visual Navigatorwww.visual-navigator.com
ProjectoolboxT 714.388.1800F 714.388.1839www.projectnavigator.com
Projectoolboxwww.projectoolbox.com
SafetyMomentwww safetymoment orgFor more information:
Project Navigator, Ltd. www.projectnavigator.com22
www.safetymoment.orgIan Webster714.388.1800 or [email protected]