+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: bharath-kumar
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 26

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    1/26

    Power Quality Research Lab., I-7, Wyb. Wyspiaoskiego 27, 50-370 Wrcaw, Plandphone +48713202626, fax +48713202006, email:[email protected]

    POWER QUALITY REPORT

    Facility: XXX

    Start Monitoring: XX Stop Monitoring: XX

    Received Data: XX Report Generated: XX

    Survey Type: Equipment Installed and Operating

    Project Manager: Zbigniew Leonowicz, PhD Eng.

    Collaborators: XXX

    SUMMARY OF REPORT:

    Power quality assessment showed no significant issues. Voltages over upper limit

    were detected mainly in L2 of the 110 kV distribution network.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    2/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 2

    Category Summary AnalysisAcceptable

    Need

    sFollow-Up

    Problem

    NotA

    pplicable

    GENERATOR (10,5 kV)

    Harmonic current factor Values within the limits

    Symmetrical

    components of currents

    Values within the limits

    Ratio of the negative-

    sequence component of

    current to the ratedcurrent

    Values within the limits

    Voltage and frequency

    limits during operation

    Values within the limits

    Voltage dependence of

    the generator frequency

    Values within the limits

    Events No events recorded

    DISTRIBUTION NETWORK (110 kV)

    Power frequencyassessment

    Values within the limits

    Long-term flicker

    severity

    Values within the limits

    Unbalance Values within the limits

    Harmonics Values within the limits

    THD Values within the limits

    Voltage Values within the limits

    Events Overvoltages, Voltage over RMS

    upper limit mainly in L2, see page

    25.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    3/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 3

    CONTENT

    1. MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO AC GENERATOR ....................................................................................... 4

    1.1. MEASURING EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................... 4

    1.2. ACGENERATOR PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................ 4

    1.3. HARMONIC CURRENT FACTOR (HCF) ........................................................................................................ 8

    1.4. SYMMETRICAL COMPONENTS OF CURRENTS ............................................................................................... 9

    1.5. RATIO OF THE NEGATIVE-SEQUENCE COMPONENT OF CURRENT TO THE RATED CURRENT (I2/IN) ............................. 11

    1.6. VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY VARIATIONS DURING OPERATION......................................................................... 12

    1.7. VOLTAGE DEPENDENCE OF THE GENERATOR FREQUENCY .............................................................................. 15

    1.8. SUMMARY OF THE REPORT

    ................................................................................................................... 15

    2. MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO 110 KV DISTRIBUTION NETWORK .......................................................... 17

    2.1. MEASURING EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................... 17

    2.2. POWER FREQUENCY ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 17

    2.3. LONG TERM FLICKER SEVERITY............................................................................................................... 19

    2.4. VOLTAGE UNBALANCE ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................... 20

    2.5. HARMONICS ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 21

    2.6. SUPPLY VOLTAGE VARIATION ................................................................................................................ 24

    2.7. EVENTS........................................................................................................................................... 25

    2.8. SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 26

    3. LITERATURE........................................................................................................................................... 26

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    4/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 4

    1. Measurements related to AC generator

    In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters

    recorded indirectly at the AC generator (10,5 kV). Recorded values were compared with

    recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of :

    harmonic current factor (HCF) [4]

    system of currents symmetrical components [4]

    ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current [4]

    voltage and frequency variations during operation [4]

    voltage dependence of the generator frequency [5]

    recorded power quality events and transients

    Measurements were done on the voltage and current transformers terminals in the XXX

    Localization of the power quality recorder in the generator circuitry presents XX

    1.1.Measuring equipmentFluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. Y760588, GPS time

    synchronization, Class-A compliance.

    1.2.AC Generator Parameters

    Manufacturer: XXX Type: XXX

    Air cooled turbo generator, apparent power 76 MVA, rated voltage 10,5 kV, current 4205 A,

    power factor 0,85, speed 3000 rpm.

    The generator parameters during 1 week assessment time are shown in Table 1-1:

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    5/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 5

    Table 1-1. Generator parameters during the assessment period

    Parameter

    Values

    minPercen-

    tile 95% max

    Active power P [MW] 24,515 62,975 64,291

    Reactive power Q[MVAr] 2,604 18,361 22,961

    Apparent Power S [MVA] 24,752 64,802 66,782

    cos 0,934 0,994 0,999

    tan 0,045 0,110 0,382

    Power factor PF 0,964 0,993 0,998

    PF is defined as: PF=(P/|S|)(Qh/|Qh|)

    Fig. 1.1. Visualization of the generatrs active pwer in 1 week. (yellow line sum of three phase quantities)

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    6/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 6

    Fig. 1.2. Visualization of the generatrs reactive pwer in 1 week.

    Fig. 1.3. Visualization of the generatrs apparent pwer in 1 week.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    7/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 7

    Fig. 1.4. Visualization of the generatrs pwer factr (cs) in 1 week.

    Fig. 1.5. Visualization of the generatrs pwer factr (PF=(P/|S|)*(Qh/|Qh|)) in 1 week.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    8/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 8

    Fig. 1.6. Localization of the power quality measurements in the generator circuitry.

    1.3.Harmonic current factor (HCF)

    Three-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a

    system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in currents not exceeding a harmonic

    current factor (HCF) of 5% [4].

    The HCF shall be computed by using the following formula:

    where in is the ratio of the harmonic current In to the rated current IN; n is the order of

    harmonic; k= 13. Harmonic components are shown in Fig. 1.7.

    Table 1-2. Assessment of the HCF

    HCF assessmentHCF

    [%]

    min 1,01

    Percentile 95% 1,69

    max 1,83

    During 100% of the assessment period the maximum HCF values are within the range of

    1,01% 1,83%, all below the limit of 5%.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    9/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 9

    Fig. 1.7. Visualizatin f the currents harmnics averaged over 1 week. (in all figures the plots of L1 are blue,

    L2-red, L3-green)

    1.4.Symmetrical components of currentsThree-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a

    system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in a system of currents where neither the

    negative-sequence component nor the zero-sequence component exceed 5% of the

    positive-sequence component [4]. Currents symmetrical components are shown in Fig. 1.8

    and 1.9.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    10/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 10

    Fig. 1.8. Visualization of currents Zero to Positive sequence ratio.

    Fig. 1.9. Visualization of currents Negative to Positive sequence ratio.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    11/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 11

    Table 1-3. Assessment of the negative and zero-sequence components

    Components ratio

    assessment

    Components ratio

    [%]

    min

    Percen-

    tile 95% max

    Zero/Pos 0,43 0,50 0,50

    Neg/Pos 0,55 1,11 2,35

    During 100% of the assessment period measured values hold in range from 0,43% to 0,50%

    for zero sequence component and from 0,55% to 2,35% for negative sequence component,

    all below the limit of 5%.

    1.5.Ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated

    current (I2/IN)

    Three-phase synchronous machines shall be capable of operating continuously on an

    unbalanced system in such a way that, with none of the phase currents exceeding the rated

    current, the ratio of the negative-sequence component of maximum current for continuous

    operation (I2) to the rated current (IN) does not exceed the value of 8% for a.c. generators

    with direct cooled (inner cooled) rotor windings [4].

    Table 1-4. Assessment of the I2/IN

    I2/IN assessmentI2/IN

    [%]

    I2/IN min 0,008

    I2/IN Percentile 95% 0,152

    I2/IN max 0,356

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    12/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 12

    Fig. 1.10. Visualization of currents I2/IN ratio.

    Figure 1.10 and Table 1-4 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the

    investigated case requirements for I2/I

    Nare fulfilled. The recorded r.m.s. values hold in range

    from 0,008% to 0,356%.

    1.6.Voltage and frequency variations during operation

    For a.c. machines rated for use on a power supply of fixed frequency supplied from an a.c.

    generator (whether local or via a supply network), combinations of voltage variation and

    frequency variation are classified as being either zone A or zone B, in accordance with Figure

    1.11 for generators and synchronous condensers. A machine shall be capable of performing

    its primary function, continuously within zone A, but need not comply fully with its

    performance at rated voltage and frequency [4].

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    13/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 13

    Fig. 1.11. Voltage and frequency limits for generators with plotted limit range of recorded values (red

    rectangle).

    Table 1-5. Assessment of voltage and frequency limits

    Voltage and frequency limitsU f

    [p.u.] [p.u.]

    U,

    f

    min 0,9997 0,9981

    Percentile 95% 1,0255 1,0010

    max 1,0257 1,0016

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    14/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 14

    Fig. 1.12. Visualization of voltage variation in 1 week.

    Fig. 1.13. Visualization of frequency variation in 1 week.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    15/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 15

    Visualization of the recorded data in Figures 1.12 and 1.1.3 and Table 1-5 contain statistical

    parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for voltage and

    frequency limits are fulfilled.

    1.7.Voltage dependence of the generator frequency

    The generating unit should maintain the following relationship between the frequency of the

    generator and voltage [5]

    where f is the change of frequency in p.u. and Ug is the change of generator voltage

    corresponding to the change of frequency, in p.u.

    Table 1-6. Assessment of voltage dependence on generator frequency

    Ug/f

    [p.u.]

    Ug/f10min

    Ug 1,64910-5

    f 8,39910-4

    max 0,0196

    For measured data, the maximum of numerical approximate gradient showed the point

    where the change of frequency was the highest (22.11.2010 06:00:00), see Table 1-6.

    Corresponding change of voltage was determined and the ratio Ug/f computed at this

    time point [2]. The requirements are fulfilled.

    1.8.Summary of the report

    Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that:

    in case of harmonic current factor (HCF), requirements are fulfilled

    in case of system of currents symmetrical components, requirements are fulfilled

    in case of the ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current ,

    requirements are fulfilled

    in case of voltage and frequency variations during operation , requirements are fulfilled

    in case of voltage dependence of the generator frequency, requirements are fulfilled

    for

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    16/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 16

    During the assessment period no events were detected (with exception to one generator

    disconnection from the grid due to causes not relevant to power quality assessment).

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    17/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 17

    2. Measurements related to 110 kV distribution network

    In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters

    recorded indirectly at power line of the distribution network (110 kV). Recorded values were

    compared with recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of :

    power frequency

    long term flicker severity

    voltage unbalance

    harmonics

    recorded power quality events and transients

    2.1.Measuring equipment

    Fluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. UO13379, GPS time

    synchronization, Class-A compliance. Measurements were done on the voltage and current

    transformers terminals of transmission line 1 in XXX.

    Localization of the power quality recorder in the distribution network of the 110 kV line

    No. 1 presents XX

    Fig. 2.1. Localization of the power quality measurements in 110 kV distribution network.

    2.2.Power frequency assessment

    The standards [3] and [4] indicate that the nominal frequency of the supply voltage shall be

    50 Hz. Under normal operating conditions the mean value of the fundamental frequency

    measured over 10 s shall be within a range of:

    for systems with synchronous connection to an interconnected system with the voltage

    below 220 kV:

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    18/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 18

    50 Hz 1 % (i.e. 49,5 Hz... 50,5 Hz) during 99,5 % of a week;

    50 Hz + 4 % / - 6 % (i.e. 47 Hz... 52 Hz) during 100 % of the week;

    Fig. 2.2. Visualization of power frequency variation.

    Table 2-1. Assessment of power frequency variation

    Frequency assessmentf

    [Hz]

    f10s min 49,905

    f10s Percentile 99,5% 50,009

    f10s max 50,109

    Visualization of the recorded set of frequency values is shown in Fig. 2.2.

    Figure 2.2 and Table 1-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the

    investigated case requirements for frequency standards are fulfilled. During 100% of the

    assessment period frequency values hold in range from 49,905 to 50,109 Hz.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    19/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 19

    2.3.Long term flicker severity

    Fig. 2.3. Visualization of long-term flicker severity

    Table 2-2. Assessment of long-term flicker severity

    Flicker assessmentL1 L2 L3

    [-] [-] [-]

    Plt2h

    min 0,15 0,16 0,15

    Percentile 95% 0,73 0,65 0,63

    max 0,75 0,66 0,64

    Visualization of the recorded set of long-term flicker coefficient values is shown in Fig 2.3.

    The standards indicate that under normal operating conditions, in any period of one week

    the long term flicker severity caused by voltage fluctuation shuld be Plt 0,8 fr 95 % f the

    time [5].

    Table 2-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case

    requirements for flicker severity are fulfilled. 95% of the recorded long-term flicker values

    hold in range from 0,15 to 0,75. Moreover 100% of the recorded values follows by the

    standard expectation.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    20/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 20

    2.4.Voltage unbalance assessment

    Fig. 2.4. Visualization of the voltage unbalance variation

    Table 2-3. Assessment of unbalance variation

    Unbalance assessmentNeg/Ps

    [%]

    Neg/Pos10min

    min 0,15

    Percentile 95% 0,26

    max 0,29

    Visualization of the recorded set of unbalance values is shown in Fig. 2.4. The standard [4]

    indicates that under normal operating conditions, during each period of one week, 95 % of

    the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the negative phase sequence component (fundamental) of

    the supply voltage shall be within the range 0 % to 1 % of the positive phase sequence

    component (fundamental).

    Table 2-3 contains statistical parameters which confirm that in the investigated case

    requirements for unbalance standards are fulfilled. The recorded unbalance coefficient hold

    in range from 0,15% to 0,29%.(with 95% values not greater than 0,26%).

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    21/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 21

    2.5.Harmonics assessment

    Table 2-4. Assessment of harmonic variations

    Harmonic assessment

    Percentile95% MaxOrder Limits L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3

    Nr. [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ]

    2 1,50 0,06 0,06 0,06 0,09 0,09 0,08

    3 2,00 0,26 0,30 0,15 0,28 0,33 0,19

    4 1,00 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,04 0,03 0,04

    5 2,00 0,74 0,66 0,71 0,90 0,89 0,95

    6 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,04 0,03 0,03

    7 2,00 0,41 0,39 0,39 0,53 0,48 0,50

    8 0,50 0,03 0,02 0,03 0,05 0,05 0,05

    9 1,00 0,04 0,04 0,04 0,07 0,07 0,07

    10 0,50 0,03 0,03 0,03 0,07 0,06 0,07

    11 1,50 0,14 0,16 0,15 0,18 0,19 0,19

    12 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

    13 1,50 0,19 0,19 0,19 0,27 0,28 0,28

    14 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03 0,03

    15 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03 0,03

    16 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,02

    17 0,00 0,10 0,10 0,12 0,13 0,12 0,15

    18 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03

    19 1,00 0,07 0,06 0,06 0,09 0,10 0,08

    20 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,03

    21 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,03 0,03 0,03

    22 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,02

    23 0,70 0,07 0,08 0,08 0,11 0,14 0,11

    24 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,02

    25 0,70 0,07 0,06 0,07 0,13 0,11 0,13

    26* 0,680,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    27* 0,660,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    28* 0,650,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    29* 0,630,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

    30* 0,620,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    31* 0,60 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    22/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 22

    32* 0,590,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    33* 0,580,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    34* 0,570,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    35* 0,560,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

    36* 0,550,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    37* 0,540,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

    38* 0,530,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    39* 0,520,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    40* 0,510,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    41* 0,500,02 0,02 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,03

    42* 0,500,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    43* 0,490,02 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,03 0,03

    44* 0,480,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    45* 0,480,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,02

    46* 0,470,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    47* 0,470,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02

    48* 0,460,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    49* 0,460,02 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01

    50* 0,450,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01

    *For harmonics higher than 25th

    the formula for the harmonic limit is 0,2+0,5(25/h) [%] [5].

    Fig, 2.5. Visualization ofthe vltages harmonic spectrum averaged in 1 week.

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    23/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 23

    Table 2-4 contains limits for particular harmonics defined in [5] and statistical parameters of

    recorded data. Distribution of the harmonics is also visible in Fig, 2.5. Performed

    measurements has detected no values over the limit.

    Fig, 2.6. Visualization of THDV variation

    Table 2-5. Assessment of THDV variation

    THDV assessmentTHDVL1 THDVL2 THDVL3

    [%] [%] [%]

    THDV

    10min

    min 0,37 0,38 0,29

    Percentile 95% 0,88 0,81 0,83

    max 0,99 0,99 1,02

    Visualization of the recorded set of total harmonics distortion in voltage is shown in Fig. 2-6,

    [5] indicates THD of the supply voltage (including all harmonics up to the order 40) shall be

    less than or equal to 3 %.

    Table 2-5 contains the statistical parameters of THDV which confirmed that in the

    investigated case requirements are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded THDV coefficient hold in

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    24/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 24

    range from 0,83% to 0,88%, Moreover 100% of the recorded values follow by the standard

    expectation.

    2.6.Supply voltage variation

    Fig. 2.7. Visualization of supply voltage variation.

    Table 2-6. Assessment of supply voltage variation

    Voltage assesmentVL1 VL2 VL3

    [V] [V] [V]

    U10min

    min67609,00 67837,00 67683,00

    Percentile 95% 69407,25 69648,00 69441,50

    max69677,00 69948,00 69698,00

    Visualization of the recorded set of supply voltage values is shown in Fig, 2.7. The [5]

    indicates that under normal operating conditions:

    - during each period of one week 95 % of the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the supply

    voltage shall be within the range f Un 10 %, i.e. in the range 57157,68 69859,38 V.

    Table 2-6 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case

    requirements for r.m.s. supply voltage standards are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded r.m.s.,

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    25/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    Page 25

    values hold in range from 69407,25 V to 69648,00 V Moreover 100% of the recorded values

    follows by standard expectation, i.e. are within the range of 50806,82 V 76210,23 V.

    2.7.Events

    During the assessment period the following events were detected:

    Overvoltages

    Designation L1 L2 L3 L123-N

    Number 1 4 1 4

    Maximum value [V] 69879 70136 69900 70136

    Maximum duration 4h 56m 26s 8h 51m 14s 6h 9m 33s 8h 51m 14s

    Details of recorded events

    Event Location DetectionDate &Time

    Duration Value

    Voltage Swells V L3 21.11.201000:45:43,71

    6h 9m 33s 6,99e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells V L1 21.11.201000:45:43,71

    4h 56m 26s 6,988e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201000:51:22,33

    8h 51m 14s 7,014e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201003:05:31,08

    5h 16m 0s 7,003e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201004:18:47,43

    4h 8m 3s 6,999e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201005:00:50,17

    4h 5m 8s 6,991e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:47:40,70

    8h 51m 14s 7,014e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:47:40,70

    5h 16m 0s 7,003e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:53:02,94

    4h 8m 3s 6,999e+04 [V]

    Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201008:33:09,62

    4h 5m 8s 6,991e+04 [V]

    RMS Upper Limit V L3 22.11.201008:33:09,62

    4h 44m 5s 6,987e+04 [V]

    RMS Upper Limit V L2 23.11.201013:20:18,80

    10h 19m 45s 7,012e+04 [V]

    RMS Upper Limit V L2 23.11.201018:55:21,73

    6h 11m 40s 7,001e+04 [V]

    RMS Upper Limit V L2 24.11.201001:43:38,14

    4h 33m 42s 6,996e+04 [V]

    RMS Upper Limit V L2 24.11.201001:43:38,14

    4h 23m 59s 6,989e+04 [V]

    h06 Harmonics V L2 24.11.201009:15:00,91

    200,06ms 0,5343 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L1 24.11.201014:27:37,11

    200,05ms 0,5235 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L1 24.11.2010

    15:38:24,90

    199,88ms 0,501 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:16,99

    999,77ms 0,5519 [%]

  • 7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb

    26/26

    Power Quality Report 2010-12-27

    h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:16,99

    199,99ms 0,5788 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:19,01

    1,0002s 0,5491 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201005:29:01,27

    200,05ms 0,5054 [%]

    h06 Harmonics V L3 25.11.201007:55:14,98

    200,11ms 0,5294 [%]

    h12 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201012:44:23,45

    199,96ms 0,7392 [%]

    2.8.Summary of the report

    Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that:

    in case of power frequency, requirements are fulfilled

    in case of voltage supply, requirements are fulfilledin case of flicker severity, requirements are fulfilled

    in case of voltage unbalance, requirements are fulfilled

    in case of THD of the supply voltage, requirements are fulfilled

    in case of harmonics, requirements are fulfilled

    Multiple events were detected during the recording time. Closer follow-up require the

    overvoltages.

    3. Literature

    [1] IEC 61000-4-30:2008, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): Testing and measurement

    techniques -Power quality measurement method

    [2]Bollen M,H,J, Irene Yu-Hua Gu, Signal Processing of Power Quality Disturbances, 2006

    The Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers, Inc

    [3]EN 50160: Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public distribution networks

    [4] IEC 60034-1: Rotating electrical machines: 7 Electrical operating conditions

    [5]Regulations of the operation and exploitation of the distribution network


Recommended