Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bharath-kumar |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 26
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
1/26
Power Quality Research Lab., I-7, Wyb. Wyspiaoskiego 27, 50-370 Wrcaw, Plandphone +48713202626, fax +48713202006, email:[email protected]
POWER QUALITY REPORT
Facility: XXX
Start Monitoring: XX Stop Monitoring: XX
Received Data: XX Report Generated: XX
Survey Type: Equipment Installed and Operating
Project Manager: Zbigniew Leonowicz, PhD Eng.
Collaborators: XXX
SUMMARY OF REPORT:
Power quality assessment showed no significant issues. Voltages over upper limit
were detected mainly in L2 of the 110 kV distribution network.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
2/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 2
Category Summary AnalysisAcceptable
Need
sFollow-Up
Problem
NotA
pplicable
GENERATOR (10,5 kV)
Harmonic current factor Values within the limits
Symmetrical
components of currents
Values within the limits
Ratio of the negative-
sequence component of
current to the ratedcurrent
Values within the limits
Voltage and frequency
limits during operation
Values within the limits
Voltage dependence of
the generator frequency
Values within the limits
Events No events recorded
DISTRIBUTION NETWORK (110 kV)
Power frequencyassessment
Values within the limits
Long-term flicker
severity
Values within the limits
Unbalance Values within the limits
Harmonics Values within the limits
THD Values within the limits
Voltage Values within the limits
Events Overvoltages, Voltage over RMS
upper limit mainly in L2, see page
25.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
3/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 3
CONTENT
1. MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO AC GENERATOR ....................................................................................... 4
1.1. MEASURING EQUIPMENT ...................................................................................................................... 4
1.2. ACGENERATOR PARAMETERS ................................................................................................................ 4
1.3. HARMONIC CURRENT FACTOR (HCF) ........................................................................................................ 8
1.4. SYMMETRICAL COMPONENTS OF CURRENTS ............................................................................................... 9
1.5. RATIO OF THE NEGATIVE-SEQUENCE COMPONENT OF CURRENT TO THE RATED CURRENT (I2/IN) ............................. 11
1.6. VOLTAGE AND FREQUENCY VARIATIONS DURING OPERATION......................................................................... 12
1.7. VOLTAGE DEPENDENCE OF THE GENERATOR FREQUENCY .............................................................................. 15
1.8. SUMMARY OF THE REPORT
................................................................................................................... 15
2. MEASUREMENTS RELATED TO 110 KV DISTRIBUTION NETWORK .......................................................... 17
2.1. MEASURING EQUIPMENT .................................................................................................................... 17
2.2. POWER FREQUENCY ASSESSMENT .......................................................................................................... 17
2.3. LONG TERM FLICKER SEVERITY............................................................................................................... 19
2.4. VOLTAGE UNBALANCE ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................... 20
2.5. HARMONICS ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 21
2.6. SUPPLY VOLTAGE VARIATION ................................................................................................................ 24
2.7. EVENTS........................................................................................................................................... 25
2.8. SUMMARY OF THE REPORT ................................................................................................................... 26
3. LITERATURE........................................................................................................................................... 26
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
4/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 4
1. Measurements related to AC generator
In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters
recorded indirectly at the AC generator (10,5 kV). Recorded values were compared with
recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of :
harmonic current factor (HCF) [4]
system of currents symmetrical components [4]
ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current [4]
voltage and frequency variations during operation [4]
voltage dependence of the generator frequency [5]
recorded power quality events and transients
Measurements were done on the voltage and current transformers terminals in the XXX
Localization of the power quality recorder in the generator circuitry presents XX
1.1.Measuring equipmentFluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. Y760588, GPS time
synchronization, Class-A compliance.
1.2.AC Generator Parameters
Manufacturer: XXX Type: XXX
Air cooled turbo generator, apparent power 76 MVA, rated voltage 10,5 kV, current 4205 A,
power factor 0,85, speed 3000 rpm.
The generator parameters during 1 week assessment time are shown in Table 1-1:
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
5/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 5
Table 1-1. Generator parameters during the assessment period
Parameter
Values
minPercen-
tile 95% max
Active power P [MW] 24,515 62,975 64,291
Reactive power Q[MVAr] 2,604 18,361 22,961
Apparent Power S [MVA] 24,752 64,802 66,782
cos 0,934 0,994 0,999
tan 0,045 0,110 0,382
Power factor PF 0,964 0,993 0,998
PF is defined as: PF=(P/|S|)(Qh/|Qh|)
Fig. 1.1. Visualization of the generatrs active pwer in 1 week. (yellow line sum of three phase quantities)
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
6/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 6
Fig. 1.2. Visualization of the generatrs reactive pwer in 1 week.
Fig. 1.3. Visualization of the generatrs apparent pwer in 1 week.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
7/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 7
Fig. 1.4. Visualization of the generatrs pwer factr (cs) in 1 week.
Fig. 1.5. Visualization of the generatrs pwer factr (PF=(P/|S|)*(Qh/|Qh|)) in 1 week.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
8/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 8
Fig. 1.6. Localization of the power quality measurements in the generator circuitry.
1.3.Harmonic current factor (HCF)
Three-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a
system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in currents not exceeding a harmonic
current factor (HCF) of 5% [4].
The HCF shall be computed by using the following formula:
where in is the ratio of the harmonic current In to the rated current IN; n is the order of
harmonic; k= 13. Harmonic components are shown in Fig. 1.7.
Table 1-2. Assessment of the HCF
HCF assessmentHCF
[%]
min 1,01
Percentile 95% 1,69
max 1,83
During 100% of the assessment period the maximum HCF values are within the range of
1,01% 1,83%, all below the limit of 5%.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
9/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 9
Fig. 1.7. Visualizatin f the currents harmnics averaged over 1 week. (in all figures the plots of L1 are blue,
L2-red, L3-green)
1.4.Symmetrical components of currentsThree-phase a.c. generators shall be suitable for supplying circuits which, when supplied by a
system of balanced and sinusoidal voltages result in a system of currents where neither the
negative-sequence component nor the zero-sequence component exceed 5% of the
positive-sequence component [4]. Currents symmetrical components are shown in Fig. 1.8
and 1.9.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
10/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 10
Fig. 1.8. Visualization of currents Zero to Positive sequence ratio.
Fig. 1.9. Visualization of currents Negative to Positive sequence ratio.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
11/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 11
Table 1-3. Assessment of the negative and zero-sequence components
Components ratio
assessment
Components ratio
[%]
min
Percen-
tile 95% max
Zero/Pos 0,43 0,50 0,50
Neg/Pos 0,55 1,11 2,35
During 100% of the assessment period measured values hold in range from 0,43% to 0,50%
for zero sequence component and from 0,55% to 2,35% for negative sequence component,
all below the limit of 5%.
1.5.Ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated
current (I2/IN)
Three-phase synchronous machines shall be capable of operating continuously on an
unbalanced system in such a way that, with none of the phase currents exceeding the rated
current, the ratio of the negative-sequence component of maximum current for continuous
operation (I2) to the rated current (IN) does not exceed the value of 8% for a.c. generators
with direct cooled (inner cooled) rotor windings [4].
Table 1-4. Assessment of the I2/IN
I2/IN assessmentI2/IN
[%]
I2/IN min 0,008
I2/IN Percentile 95% 0,152
I2/IN max 0,356
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
12/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 12
Fig. 1.10. Visualization of currents I2/IN ratio.
Figure 1.10 and Table 1-4 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the
investigated case requirements for I2/I
Nare fulfilled. The recorded r.m.s. values hold in range
from 0,008% to 0,356%.
1.6.Voltage and frequency variations during operation
For a.c. machines rated for use on a power supply of fixed frequency supplied from an a.c.
generator (whether local or via a supply network), combinations of voltage variation and
frequency variation are classified as being either zone A or zone B, in accordance with Figure
1.11 for generators and synchronous condensers. A machine shall be capable of performing
its primary function, continuously within zone A, but need not comply fully with its
performance at rated voltage and frequency [4].
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
13/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 13
Fig. 1.11. Voltage and frequency limits for generators with plotted limit range of recorded values (red
rectangle).
Table 1-5. Assessment of voltage and frequency limits
Voltage and frequency limitsU f
[p.u.] [p.u.]
U,
f
min 0,9997 0,9981
Percentile 95% 1,0255 1,0010
max 1,0257 1,0016
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
14/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 14
Fig. 1.12. Visualization of voltage variation in 1 week.
Fig. 1.13. Visualization of frequency variation in 1 week.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
15/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 15
Visualization of the recorded data in Figures 1.12 and 1.1.3 and Table 1-5 contain statistical
parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case requirements for voltage and
frequency limits are fulfilled.
1.7.Voltage dependence of the generator frequency
The generating unit should maintain the following relationship between the frequency of the
generator and voltage [5]
where f is the change of frequency in p.u. and Ug is the change of generator voltage
corresponding to the change of frequency, in p.u.
Table 1-6. Assessment of voltage dependence on generator frequency
Ug/f
[p.u.]
Ug/f10min
Ug 1,64910-5
f 8,39910-4
max 0,0196
For measured data, the maximum of numerical approximate gradient showed the point
where the change of frequency was the highest (22.11.2010 06:00:00), see Table 1-6.
Corresponding change of voltage was determined and the ratio Ug/f computed at this
time point [2]. The requirements are fulfilled.
1.8.Summary of the report
Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that:
in case of harmonic current factor (HCF), requirements are fulfilled
in case of system of currents symmetrical components, requirements are fulfilled
in case of the ratio of the negative-sequence component of current to the rated current ,
requirements are fulfilled
in case of voltage and frequency variations during operation , requirements are fulfilled
in case of voltage dependence of the generator frequency, requirements are fulfilled
for
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
16/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 16
During the assessment period no events were detected (with exception to one generator
disconnection from the grid due to causes not relevant to power quality assessment).
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
17/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 17
2. Measurements related to 110 kV distribution network
In this chapter, the power quality (PQ) report contains assessment of set of PQ parameters
recorded indirectly at power line of the distribution network (110 kV). Recorded values were
compared with recommended values. Power quality report includes assessment of :
power frequency
long term flicker severity
voltage unbalance
harmonics
recorded power quality events and transients
2.1.Measuring equipment
Fluke 1760, Three-Phase Power Quality Recorder Topas, Serial No. UO13379, GPS time
synchronization, Class-A compliance. Measurements were done on the voltage and current
transformers terminals of transmission line 1 in XXX.
Localization of the power quality recorder in the distribution network of the 110 kV line
No. 1 presents XX
Fig. 2.1. Localization of the power quality measurements in 110 kV distribution network.
2.2.Power frequency assessment
The standards [3] and [4] indicate that the nominal frequency of the supply voltage shall be
50 Hz. Under normal operating conditions the mean value of the fundamental frequency
measured over 10 s shall be within a range of:
for systems with synchronous connection to an interconnected system with the voltage
below 220 kV:
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
18/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 18
50 Hz 1 % (i.e. 49,5 Hz... 50,5 Hz) during 99,5 % of a week;
50 Hz + 4 % / - 6 % (i.e. 47 Hz... 52 Hz) during 100 % of the week;
Fig. 2.2. Visualization of power frequency variation.
Table 2-1. Assessment of power frequency variation
Frequency assessmentf
[Hz]
f10s min 49,905
f10s Percentile 99,5% 50,009
f10s max 50,109
Visualization of the recorded set of frequency values is shown in Fig. 2.2.
Figure 2.2 and Table 1-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the
investigated case requirements for frequency standards are fulfilled. During 100% of the
assessment period frequency values hold in range from 49,905 to 50,109 Hz.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
19/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 19
2.3.Long term flicker severity
Fig. 2.3. Visualization of long-term flicker severity
Table 2-2. Assessment of long-term flicker severity
Flicker assessmentL1 L2 L3
[-] [-] [-]
Plt2h
min 0,15 0,16 0,15
Percentile 95% 0,73 0,65 0,63
max 0,75 0,66 0,64
Visualization of the recorded set of long-term flicker coefficient values is shown in Fig 2.3.
The standards indicate that under normal operating conditions, in any period of one week
the long term flicker severity caused by voltage fluctuation shuld be Plt 0,8 fr 95 % f the
time [5].
Table 2-2 contains the statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case
requirements for flicker severity are fulfilled. 95% of the recorded long-term flicker values
hold in range from 0,15 to 0,75. Moreover 100% of the recorded values follows by the
standard expectation.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
20/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 20
2.4.Voltage unbalance assessment
Fig. 2.4. Visualization of the voltage unbalance variation
Table 2-3. Assessment of unbalance variation
Unbalance assessmentNeg/Ps
[%]
Neg/Pos10min
min 0,15
Percentile 95% 0,26
max 0,29
Visualization of the recorded set of unbalance values is shown in Fig. 2.4. The standard [4]
indicates that under normal operating conditions, during each period of one week, 95 % of
the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the negative phase sequence component (fundamental) of
the supply voltage shall be within the range 0 % to 1 % of the positive phase sequence
component (fundamental).
Table 2-3 contains statistical parameters which confirm that in the investigated case
requirements for unbalance standards are fulfilled. The recorded unbalance coefficient hold
in range from 0,15% to 0,29%.(with 95% values not greater than 0,26%).
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
21/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 21
2.5.Harmonics assessment
Table 2-4. Assessment of harmonic variations
Harmonic assessment
Percentile95% MaxOrder Limits L1 L2 L3 L1 L2 L3
Nr. [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ] [ % ]
2 1,50 0,06 0,06 0,06 0,09 0,09 0,08
3 2,00 0,26 0,30 0,15 0,28 0,33 0,19
4 1,00 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,04 0,03 0,04
5 2,00 0,74 0,66 0,71 0,90 0,89 0,95
6 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,04 0,03 0,03
7 2,00 0,41 0,39 0,39 0,53 0,48 0,50
8 0,50 0,03 0,02 0,03 0,05 0,05 0,05
9 1,00 0,04 0,04 0,04 0,07 0,07 0,07
10 0,50 0,03 0,03 0,03 0,07 0,06 0,07
11 1,50 0,14 0,16 0,15 0,18 0,19 0,19
12 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
13 1,50 0,19 0,19 0,19 0,27 0,28 0,28
14 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03 0,03
15 0,50 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03 0,03
16 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,02
17 0,00 0,10 0,10 0,12 0,13 0,12 0,15
18 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,03 0,03
19 1,00 0,07 0,06 0,06 0,09 0,10 0,08
20 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,03
21 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,03 0,03 0,03
22 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,02 0,02
23 0,70 0,07 0,08 0,08 0,11 0,14 0,11
24 0,50 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,03 0,02
25 0,70 0,07 0,06 0,07 0,13 0,11 0,13
26* 0,680,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
27* 0,660,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
28* 0,650,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
29* 0,630,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
30* 0,620,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
31* 0,60 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
22/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 22
32* 0,590,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
33* 0,580,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
34* 0,570,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
35* 0,560,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
36* 0,550,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
37* 0,540,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
38* 0,530,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
39* 0,520,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
40* 0,510,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
41* 0,500,02 0,02 0,03 0,02 0,02 0,03
42* 0,500,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
43* 0,490,02 0,03 0,03 0,02 0,03 0,03
44* 0,480,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
45* 0,480,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01 0,02
46* 0,470,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
47* 0,470,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02 0,02
48* 0,460,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
49* 0,460,02 0,01 0,01 0,02 0,01 0,01
50* 0,450,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01 0,01
*For harmonics higher than 25th
the formula for the harmonic limit is 0,2+0,5(25/h) [%] [5].
Fig, 2.5. Visualization ofthe vltages harmonic spectrum averaged in 1 week.
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
23/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 23
Table 2-4 contains limits for particular harmonics defined in [5] and statistical parameters of
recorded data. Distribution of the harmonics is also visible in Fig, 2.5. Performed
measurements has detected no values over the limit.
Fig, 2.6. Visualization of THDV variation
Table 2-5. Assessment of THDV variation
THDV assessmentTHDVL1 THDVL2 THDVL3
[%] [%] [%]
THDV
10min
min 0,37 0,38 0,29
Percentile 95% 0,88 0,81 0,83
max 0,99 0,99 1,02
Visualization of the recorded set of total harmonics distortion in voltage is shown in Fig. 2-6,
[5] indicates THD of the supply voltage (including all harmonics up to the order 40) shall be
less than or equal to 3 %.
Table 2-5 contains the statistical parameters of THDV which confirmed that in the
investigated case requirements are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded THDV coefficient hold in
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
24/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 24
range from 0,83% to 0,88%, Moreover 100% of the recorded values follow by the standard
expectation.
2.6.Supply voltage variation
Fig. 2.7. Visualization of supply voltage variation.
Table 2-6. Assessment of supply voltage variation
Voltage assesmentVL1 VL2 VL3
[V] [V] [V]
U10min
min67609,00 67837,00 67683,00
Percentile 95% 69407,25 69648,00 69441,50
max69677,00 69948,00 69698,00
Visualization of the recorded set of supply voltage values is shown in Fig, 2.7. The [5]
indicates that under normal operating conditions:
- during each period of one week 95 % of the 10 min mean r.m.s. values of the supply
voltage shall be within the range f Un 10 %, i.e. in the range 57157,68 69859,38 V.
Table 2-6 contains statistical parameters which confirmed that in the investigated case
requirements for r.m.s. supply voltage standards are fulfilled, 95% of the recorded r.m.s.,
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
25/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
Page 25
values hold in range from 69407,25 V to 69648,00 V Moreover 100% of the recorded values
follows by standard expectation, i.e. are within the range of 50806,82 V 76210,23 V.
2.7.Events
During the assessment period the following events were detected:
Overvoltages
Designation L1 L2 L3 L123-N
Number 1 4 1 4
Maximum value [V] 69879 70136 69900 70136
Maximum duration 4h 56m 26s 8h 51m 14s 6h 9m 33s 8h 51m 14s
Details of recorded events
Event Location DetectionDate &Time
Duration Value
Voltage Swells V L3 21.11.201000:45:43,71
6h 9m 33s 6,99e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells V L1 21.11.201000:45:43,71
4h 56m 26s 6,988e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201000:51:22,33
8h 51m 14s 7,014e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201003:05:31,08
5h 16m 0s 7,003e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201004:18:47,43
4h 8m 3s 6,999e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells V L2 21.11.201005:00:50,17
4h 5m 8s 6,991e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:47:40,70
8h 51m 14s 7,014e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:47:40,70
5h 16m 0s 7,003e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201000:53:02,94
4h 8m 3s 6,999e+04 [V]
Voltage Swells 3-ph V L123-N 22.11.201008:33:09,62
4h 5m 8s 6,991e+04 [V]
RMS Upper Limit V L3 22.11.201008:33:09,62
4h 44m 5s 6,987e+04 [V]
RMS Upper Limit V L2 23.11.201013:20:18,80
10h 19m 45s 7,012e+04 [V]
RMS Upper Limit V L2 23.11.201018:55:21,73
6h 11m 40s 7,001e+04 [V]
RMS Upper Limit V L2 24.11.201001:43:38,14
4h 33m 42s 6,996e+04 [V]
RMS Upper Limit V L2 24.11.201001:43:38,14
4h 23m 59s 6,989e+04 [V]
h06 Harmonics V L2 24.11.201009:15:00,91
200,06ms 0,5343 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L1 24.11.201014:27:37,11
200,05ms 0,5235 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L1 24.11.2010
15:38:24,90
199,88ms 0,501 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:16,99
999,77ms 0,5519 [%]
7/28/2019 Copy of Power Quality Assessment Reportweb
26/26
Power Quality Report 2010-12-27
h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:16,99
199,99ms 0,5788 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201002:05:19,01
1,0002s 0,5491 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201005:29:01,27
200,05ms 0,5054 [%]
h06 Harmonics V L3 25.11.201007:55:14,98
200,11ms 0,5294 [%]
h12 Harmonics V L1 25.11.201012:44:23,45
199,96ms 0,7392 [%]
2.8.Summary of the report
Presented in previous section assessment of crucial power quality parameters indicates that:
in case of power frequency, requirements are fulfilled
in case of voltage supply, requirements are fulfilledin case of flicker severity, requirements are fulfilled
in case of voltage unbalance, requirements are fulfilled
in case of THD of the supply voltage, requirements are fulfilled
in case of harmonics, requirements are fulfilled
Multiple events were detected during the recording time. Closer follow-up require the
overvoltages.
3. Literature
[1] IEC 61000-4-30:2008, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC): Testing and measurement
techniques -Power quality measurement method
[2]Bollen M,H,J, Irene Yu-Hua Gu, Signal Processing of Power Quality Disturbances, 2006
The Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers, Inc
[3]EN 50160: Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public distribution networks
[4] IEC 60034-1: Rotating electrical machines: 7 Electrical operating conditions
[5]Regulations of the operation and exploitation of the distribution network