Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | cecily-taylor |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada, Inc. 19-1
PowerPoint PresentationStan Hatfield . Southwestern Illinois College
Ken Pinzke . Southwestern Illinois College
Charles Henderson . University of Calgary
Tark Hamilton . Camosun College
Chapter 19 in 1st edition& 1 in 2nd edition
Plate Tectonics
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-2
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-3
Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time
Alfred Wegener• First proposed his continental drift hypothesis in
1915 • Published The Origin of Continents and Oceans
Continental Drift Hypothesis • Supercontinent called Pangaea began breaking
apart about 200 million years ago
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-4
Pangaea approximately 200 million years ago.
Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time
Late Paleozoic Supercontinent, Equatorial Tethys Sea, Pan Thallassic Ocean
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-5
Continental Drift Hypothesis• Continents "drifted" to present positions
Evidence used in support of the continental drift hypothesis
• Fit of the continents • Fossil evidence• Rock type and structural similarities • Paleoclimatic evidence
Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-6Wegener’s matching of mountain ranges on different continents.
Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-7Permian Glaciation, Tillites, Pavements: Paleoclimatic evidence for continental drift.
Continental Drift: An Idea Before Its Time
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-8
The Great Debate: No Viable Mechanism
Objections to the Continental Drift Hypothesis • Inability to provide a mechanism capable of
moving continents across the globe • Wegener suggested that continents plowed through
the ocean crust, much like ice breakers cut through ice
• Proposed Tidal forcing, too weak, Rocks too strong
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-9
Continental Drift and the Scientific Method• Wegener’s hypothesis was correct in principle, but
contained incorrect details • For any scientific viewpoint to gain wide
acceptance, supporting evidence from all realms of science must be found
• A few scientists considered Wegener’s ideas plausible & continued the search a generation later
• Perseverance is important in Science, ideas must be supported and widely publicized
Lessons from Continental Drift’s Failure
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-10
Continental Drift and Paleomagnetism
Initial impetus for the renewed interest in continental drift came from rock paleomagnetism
• Keith Runcorn’s Lab at Newcastle & Ted Irving
Magnetized minerals in rocks • Record the direction of Earth’s magnetic poles • Provide a means of determining their latitude of
origin: tan ( Inclination ) = 2 tan ( Latitude )• Oriented strata of known age, yet from different
continents track relative motions• Polar Wander Paths
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-11
Polar Wandering• Rocks from successive ages give successive N-S
poles for their continents• The apparent movement of the magnetic poles
illustrated in magnetized rocks indicates that the continents have moved both absolutely and relative to each other
• Shows that Europe was much closer to the equator when coal-producing swamps existed
• Brazil, Africa & India were much closer to the S pole in Permian time
• Antarctica is the least travelled continent!
Continental Drift and Paleomagnetism
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-12Apparent polar-wandering paths for Eurasia and North America.
Continental Drift and Paleomagnetism
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-13
Polar Wandering• Polar wandering curves for North America and
Europe have similar paths, but are separated by about 24 of longitude
– PW Paths for Cambrian through Permian strata are parallel for Europe and North America
– PW Paths for Triassic through Recent seem to converge progressively
– Differences between the paths can be reconciled if the continents are placed next to one another
– ~205Ma is the point of departure, with the opening of the Atlantic
Continental Drift and Paleomagnetism
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-14
A Scientific Revolution BeginsDuring the 1950s and 1960s technological strides permitted extensive SONAR mapping of the ocean floorDuring the Cold War, any ship of convenience towed a magnetometer (sub chasing!) Magnetic stripes were discovered.The first complete bathymetric maps of the world seafloor assembled by Bruce Heezen & Marie Tharp of the US Office of Naval Research MOR’s & Deep Sea Trenches were discoveredSeafloor spreading hypothesis was proposed by Harry Hess in the early 1960s
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-15
Geomagnetic reversals • Both in strata on land and in boreholes beneath the
sea the magnetic succession is found to be full of reversals with anti-parallel directions
• The advent of radiometric dating K/Ar & U/Pb• Earth's magnetic field periodically reverses
polarity – the north magnetic pole becomes the south magnetic pole, and vice versa
• Dates when the polarity of Earth’s magnetism changed were determined from lava flows
A Scientific Revolution Begins anew with the idea of Sea Floor Spreading
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-16The ocean floor as a magnetic tape recorder.
Magnetic Stripes Record Sea Floor Spreading During a Succession of Geomagnetic Reversals
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-17
Geomagnetic reversals• Geomagnetic reversals are recorded both across
and within the ocean crust by the Deep Sea Drilling Program’s Glomar Challenger and other marine geoscience programs
• In 1963 Fred Vine and D. Matthews tied the discovery of magnetic stripes in the ocean crust near ridges to Hess’s concept of seafloor spreading
• Sediments are found to contain magnetic reversal stratigraphy too and with microfossils this provides the basis for a global magnetostratigraphy back through the Cretaceous
The Birth of Plate Tectonics: 1960’s
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-18
Geophysics Provided the New Data that the Older Geology Lacked
• Paleomagnetism, Magnetic Reversals, Magnetostratigraphy (evidence of past magnetism recorded in the rocks) was the most convincing evidence set forth to support the concepts of continental drift and seafloor spreading
• Bathymetry & Heat Flow: Ridges young, shallow and warm, trenches old, deep and cold with thicker sediments
• Seismics show Lithosphere thickens away from MOR’s
• Major Earthquakes were located along plate boundaries
• Volcanic Arcs behind trenches
Plate Tectonics = Continental Drift + Seafloor Spreading
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-19
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Spreading & New Crust Formed at MOR’s & CR’s, high heat flow, active volcanismSubduction zones (Wadati-Benioff zones) of deepening earthquakes behind trenchesRecycled water, gases & light elements from ArcsMuch more encompassing theory than continental drift The composite of a variety of ideas that explain the observed motion of Earth’s lithosphere through the mechanisms of subduction and seafloor spreading
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-20
Earth’s Major Plates • Associated with Earth's strong, rigid outer layer
– Known as the lithosphere
– Consists of uppermost mantle and overlying crust
– Overlies a weaker region in the mantle called the asthenosphere
– Plates are no longer just Continents, e.g. the North America Plate extends from Greenland and Iceland to Vancouver Island including both older continents and some younger seafloor
– 3 Types of Boundaries: Ridges, Trenches & Transforms
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-21
Earth’s Major Plates• ~Seven major lithospheric plates: Pacific, Eurasia,
Antarctica, N.America, S. America, Africa, Indian Ocean
• Up to a dozen smaller plates: Australia, Caribbean, Mediterranean, Scotian Sea, Juan de Fuca, Turkey, Philippine Sea…
• Plates are in motion and continually changing in shape and size
• Largest plate is the Pacific Plate• Several plates include an entire continent plus a
large area of seafloor
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-22
Earth’s Major Plates• Motions measured by Magnetic stripes & Hotspot
Tracks over Ma to 10’s of Ma and VLBI & GPS arrays over months to years
• Plate boundaries with faster motions have greater volcanism and seismicity (Java-Sumatra)
• Plates move relative to each other at a very slow but continuous rate
– Average about 5 centimetres per year
– Cooler, denser slabs of oceanic lithosphere descend into the mantle
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-23
Plate Boundaries• Almost all major interactions among individual
plates occur along their boundaries– Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes
– Volcanic & Plutonic Arcs
– Rare exceptions are:
– Within plate seismicity
– Within plate hotspot volcanism
• Types of plate boundaries – Divergent plate boundaries (constructive margins)
– Convergent plate boundaries (destructive margins)
– Transform fault boundaries (conservative margins)
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-24
Plate Boundaries• Each plate is bounded by a combination of the
three types of boundaries • New plate boundaries can be created in response to
changes in the forces acting on these rigid slabs• Changes to plate boundaries require several Ma• Earthquakes on one boundary are unrelated to
those on others• Volcanoes keep their own sweet time
Plate Tectonics: The New Paradigm
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-25
Divergent Plate BoundariesMost are located along the crests of oceanic ridges and can be thought of as constructive plate margins with frequent volcanism & Quakes <6
Continental Rifts:• East African Rift, Rio Grande, Baikal Rift, Rhine Graben
• Grabens, volcanic plateaux, normal faulting, hot springs
Oceanic ridges and seafloor spreading • Along well-developed divergent plate boundaries, the
seafloor is elevated forming oceanic ridges
• Mid Atlantic Rift, Lomonosov Ridge, East Pacific Rise, Juan de Fuca Ridge, Galapagos Ridge, SW Indian Ridge…
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-26
Oceanic Ridges and Seafloor Spreading• Seafloor spreading occurs along the oceanic ridge
system• Active volcanism causes black smokers, vent
communities & seafloor massive sulfide deposits (SMS)
Spreading Rates and Ridge Topography • Ridge systems exhibit topographic differences • Topographic differences are controlled by
spreading rates– Slow spreading = rugged topography
– Med-fast spreading = axial valley
Divergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-27Divergent boundaries are located mainly along oceanic ridges.
Divergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-28
Spreading Rates and Ridge Topography• Topographic differences are controlled by
spreading rates– At slow spreading rates (1-5 centimetres per year), a
prominent rift valley develops along the ridge crest that is wide (30-50 km) and deep (1500-3000 metres) Mid-Atlantic
– At intermediate spreading rates (5-9 centimetres per year), rift valleys that develop are shallow with subdued topography East Pacific
Divergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-29
Spreading Rates and Ridge Topography• Topographic differences are controlled by
spreading rates– At spreading rates greater than 9 centimetres per year
no median rift valley develops and these areas are usually narrow and extensively faulted
– At Thingvallir in West Iceland the rift is above sea level!
Continental Rifts• Splits landmasses into two or more smaller
segments • These start with 3 arms but usually 1 or 2 of them
fail
Divergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-30
Continental Rifts• Examples include the East African rift valleys and
the Rhine Valley in northern Europe• Produced by extensional forces acting on the
lithospheric plates • Not all rift valleys develop into full-fledged
spreading centres • There are failed Precambrian rifts beneath
southern Alberta, the East arm of Great Slave Lake and Mid Continent between Minnesota and Missouri!
Divergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-31The East African rift – a divergent boundary on land.
Divergent Plate Boundaries
RRR Triple Junction
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-32
Convergent Plate BoundariesOlder portions of oceanic plates are returned to the mantle in these destructive plate margins
• Surface expression of the descending plate is an ocean trench
• Called subduction zones • Average angle at which oceanic lithosphere
descends into the mantle is about 45• Older colder lithosphere descends steeper up to 90°• Younger warmer lithosphere descends flatter <15°• The steeper the angle, the deeper the trench• Younger descending plates make the greatest
earthquakes ~MR > 9.0
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-33
Although all have the same basic characteristics, they are highly variable features Types of Convergent Boundaries
• Oceanic-Oceanic Convergence– Denser-older of 2 oceanic slabs sinks into the asthenosphere– Earthquakes under Island arc (Antilles, Philippines, Japan)– Primitive andesitic volcanoes– Seabed explosive volcanoes and “black smokers” + SMS (PNG)
• Oceanic-Continental Convergence– Denser oceanic slab sinks into the asthenosphere – Earthquakes are under the edge of the continent– Andean type arcs with granitic plutons (Coast Mountains, Sierras)– Big porphyry Cu-Mo deposits
• Continent-Continent Convergence– Subducted slab falls away– Massive continental mountain belt built with crustal melting (Himalayas,
Urals, Appalachians-Caledonides)– Massive earthquakes under “backstop” continent (Tibet, China)– Rare metal pegmatites
Convergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-34
Oceanic-Oceanic Convergence When two oceanic slabs converge, the older, colder, denser one descends beneath the otherOften forms volcanoes on the ocean floor (Marianas arc)If the volcanoes emerge as islands, a volcanic island arc is formed (Japan, Aleutian islands, Tonga islands, Antilles, Java-Sumatra)Super-collosal explosive volcanoes as water hits magma (Krakatau)Active black smokers & Seafloor Massive Sulfides SMS (Papua New Guinea)
Convergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-35
Oceanic-Continental ConvergenceAs the plate descends, water from the slab causes flux partial melting of mantle rockThis generates magmas having a basaltic or occasionally, andesitic compositionThese magmas can evolve in the crust to batholiths and explosive rhyolitesPorphyry Cu-Mo deposits in batholiths (BC)Shallow hydrothermal systems produce epithermal Au-Ag-Cu deposits (Chile, Peru, Mexico, BC)Mountains produced in part by volcanic activity associated with subduction of oceanic lithosphere are called continental volcanic arcs (Andes and Cascades)
Convergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-36
Continental-Continental ConvergenceContinued subduction can bring two continents together
Less dense, buoyant continental lithosphere does not subduct
Result is a collision between two continental blocks
Process produces massive inracontinental mountains (Himalayas, Alps, Urals, Appalachians)
Thickening causes lower crust to melt making granites
Rare metal pegmatite deposits
Convergent Plate Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-37The collision of India and Asia produced the Himalayas.
Convergent Plate Boundaries
Miocene ~10Ma Modern
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-38
Transform Fault Boundaries
The third type of plate boundary
Plates slide past one another and no new lithosphere is created or destroyed
Transform Faults all take up differential motion• Most join two segments of a mid-ocean ridge as
parts of prominent linear breaks in the oceanic crust known as fracture zones
• Others join subduction zones, offset or opposed• Can also join a ridge to a subduction zone (Queen
Charlotte Fault connects Juan de Fuca Ridge to Aleutians)
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-39
Transform Faults• A few (the San Andreas Fault in California,
the Alpine Fault of New Zealand & the Anatolian Fault in Turkey) cut through continental crust
– This type makes large earthquakes ~MR>7
• Most separate ocean crust of different rates & ages (Blanco, Sovanco, Mendocino, Clipperton)
– Only the part between ridges, trenches is seismically active
Transform Fault Boundaries
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-40
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
Plate Tectonics and Earthquakes
• Plate tectonics model accounts for the global distribution of earthquakes
– Absence of deep-focus earthquakes along the oceanic ridge is consistent with plate tectonics theory (too warm)
– Deep-focus earthquakes are closely associated with subduction zones (cold brittle zone extends into mantle)
– The pattern of earthquakes along a trench provides a method for tracking the plate's descent
– Young buoyant subducting plates have wide shallow Benioff zones & the most damaging earthquakes
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-41Deep-focus earthquakes occur along convergent boundaries.
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-42Earthquake foci in the vicinity of the Japan trench.
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
2 Subduction Zones
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-43
Evidence from Ocean Drilling• Some of the most convincing evidence confirming
seafloor spreading has come from drilling directly into ocean-floor sediment
– Age of deepest sediments in trenches (Marianas, Peru-Chile)
– Thickness of ocean-floor sediments verifies seafloor spreading (thickens & ages away from ridges)
– Oldest sediment & oldest ocean crust is distant from MOR’s
– Age of oldest/deepest sediment = age of underlying magnetic anomaly
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-44
Hot Spots • Caused by rising plumes of mantle material
– Many from bumps on Core-Mantle Boundary
• Volcanoes can form over them (Hawaiian Island chain, Azores, Yellowstone, Fiji, Iceland)
• Most mantle plumes are long-lived structures and at least some originate at great depth, perhaps at the mantle-core boundary
• Isotopes of great “growth ages” from recycled ancient crust carried into lower mantle
• Fixed reference frame for plate motions (Pacific, Yellowstone)
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-45The Hawaiian Islands have formed over a stationary hot spot.
Testing the Plate Tectonics Model
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-46
Measuring Plate Motion
Currently possible with space-age technology to directly measure relative motion between plates
Two methods used are VLBI-Very Long Baseline Interferometry & GPS-Global Positioning System
Calculations show that Hawaii is moving NW and approaching Japan at 8.3 cm/year
Yellowstone shows SW motion of North America since Miocene
North America and Europe are getting 5 cm further apart per year (50 km per Ma)
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-47
The Driving MechanismNo one driving mechanism accounts for all major motions & forces in plate tectonics. Researchers agree that convective flow in the rocky 2900 kilometre-thick mantle is the basic driving force of plate tectonics
Early ideas were that convection was passive and slower than plate motionMost now believe the Mantle moves faster than the Plates
MOR’s are thermal bulges (high spots) in Upper Mantle while Trenches are (low spots)
Modern researchers believe that Lithosphere Plates slide downhill over the weak Asthenosphere
Early ideas for mechanisms generate forces that contribute to plate motion
Slab-pull (but rocks tensile strengths are weak)Ridge-push (but rocks are weak in compression & no folds or thrusts on MOR system)
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-48
Models of Plate-Mantle Convection • Any model describing mantle convection must
explain why basalts erupt along the oceanic ridge• All of the ideas are constrained by seismic
information about rock properties in the Earth’s interior: fast, slow, strong, weak, cold, hot…
• Models – Layering at 660 kilometres
– Whole-mantle convection
– Deep-layer model
The Driving Mechanism
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-49
Importance of Plate TectonicsTheory provides a unified explanation of Earth’s major surface morphology & internal processes Within the framework of plate tectonics, geologists have found explanations for the geologic distribution of earthquakes, volcanoes, and mountain beltsPlate tectonics also provides explanations for past distributions of plants and animalsRegions of Seismicity, High Heat Flow are explainedDifferent ore deposits, rock types & rare minerals are explained
Copyright (c) 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc. 19-50
End of Plate Tectonics as a
Background for much of the rest of
the course!Chapter 19