Corals of the genus Porites are a locally abundant componentof the epibiont community on mangrove prop roots atCalabash Caye, Turneffe Atoll, BelizeZachary A Bengtsson, Kirsten M Kuhn, Anya T Battaglino, Allen S Li, Matthew N Talbot, Marzie Wafapoor, Calder J Atta, Michael BKowalski, Sarah P Margolis, Ekaterina A Rar, Elizabeth M Burmester, Kathryn C Lesneski, Karina Scavo, Les Kaufman, Nathan LStewart, John R Finnerty
Mangrove prop roots support diverse epibiont communities, but they are generallyregarded as inhospitable for corals. However, recent reports have documented coralsthriving on mangrove roots in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Cuba, and it has been proposedthat mangroves may provide a refuge from environmental conditions that trigger coralmortality on nearby reefs. It also raises interesting questions about the potentialevolutionary significance of coral populations in mangrove forest. We investigated diversemangrove habitats for the presence of corals at Calabash Caye, Belize, part of a recentlydesignated marine reserve on Turneffe Atoll. Here we present data on the distribution, sizeand morphology of 127 colonies of branching Porites found in a survey of 1858 meters ofmangrove prop roots fringing three qualitatively distinct bodies of water: a high-flowchannel, a moderate-flow creek, and a low-flow mangrove pond. The distribution of Poriteswas highly clumped, with 108 colonies occurring in a 178-meter stretch of shoreline alongthe high flow channel. Colony morphology varied widely, from bushy colonies with morethan 40 branch tips per 1000 cm3 of ecological volume, to spindly colonies with fewer than10 branch tips per 1000 cm3, to new recruits that have not yet developed distinctbranches. Comparisons of the same coral-bearing roots in 2013 and 2014 revealed thatcolonies can experience substantial growth in a year’s time. We also document a muchmore diverse coral fauna living in the mangroves at Crooked Creek, a high flowenvironment on the western edge of Turneffe Atoll. The data described here contribute toan emerging picture of mangroves as potentially important habitat for corals, whilesuggesting that different types of mangrove habitat vary in their suitability for differentspecies of coral. Future studies are needed to identify the critical environmental featuresof mangrove habitats that support coral, to further characterize those corals that canutilize mangrove habitat, and to investigate potential connectivity between coralpopulations in mangroves and nearby reef habitats.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
1
2
3 Corals of the genus Porites are a locally abundant component of the epibiont
4 community on mangrove prop roots at Calabash Caye, Turneffe Atoll, Belize
5
6 Zachary A. Bengtsson1,^, Kirsten M. Kuhn1,2,^, Anya T. Battaglino2, Allen S. Li2, Matthew N.
7 Talbot1,2, Marzie Wafapoor1,2, Calder J. Atta2, Michael B. Kowalski1,2, Sarah P. Margolis2,
8 Ekaterina Rar2, Elizabeth M. Burmester1, Kathryn C. Lesneski1, Karina Scavo1, Les Kaufman1,2,
9 Nathan L. Stewart1,2 and John R. Finnerty1,2*
10
11 Boston University Biology Department1 and Marine Program2
12 5 Cummington Mall, Boston, MA 02215
13
14 ^These authors contributed equally to this manuscript.
15
16 *Corresponding Author:
17 Telephone: 617-353-6984
18 Fax: 617-353-6340
19 e-mail: [email protected]
20
21 Keywords: coral; mangrove; epibiont; Porites,
22
23 Running Head: Coral epibionts of mangrove roots in Belize
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
24 Abstract
25 Mangrove prop roots support diverse epibiont communities, but they are generally regarded as
26 inhospitable for corals. However, recent reports have documented corals thriving on mangrove
27 roots in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Cuba, and it has been proposed that mangroves may provide
28 a refuge from environmental conditions that trigger coral mortality on nearby reefs. It also raises
29 interesting questions about the potential evolutionary significance of coral populations in
30 mangrove forest. We investigated diverse mangrove habitats for the presence of corals at
31 Calabash Caye, Belize, part of a recently designated marine reserve on Turneffe Atoll. Here we
32 present data on the distribution, size and morphology of 127 colonies of branching Porites found
33 in a survey of 1858 meters of mangrove prop roots fringing three qualitatively distinct bodies of
34 water: a high-flow channel, a moderate-flow creek, and a low-flow mangrove pond. The
35 distribution of Porites was highly clumped, with 108 colonies occurring in a 178-meter stretch of
36 shoreline along the high flow channel. Colony morphology varied widely, from bushy colonies
37 with more than 40 branch tips per 1000 cm3 of ecological volume, to spindly colonies with fewer
38 than 10 branch tips per 1000 cm3, to new recruits that have not yet developed distinct branches.
39 Comparisons of the same coral-bearing roots in 2013 and 2014 revealed that colonies can
40 experience substantial growth in a year’s time. We also document a much more diverse coral
41 fauna living in the mangroves at Crooked Creek, a high flow environment on the western edge of
42 Turneffe Atoll. The data described here contribute to an emerging picture of mangroves as
43 potentially important habitat for corals, while suggesting that different types of mangrove habitat
44 vary in their suitability for different species of coral. Future studies are needed to identify the
45 critical environmental features of mangrove habitats that support coral, to further characterize
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
46 those corals that can utilize mangrove habitat, and to investigate potential connectivity between
47 coral populations in mangroves and nearby reef habitats.
48
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
49 Introduction
50 Mangroves can promote the health and taxonomic richness of nearby coral reefs through a
51 number of mechanisms, including stabilizing sediments, increasing water clarity, and serving as
52 a nursery for juvenile fishes and invertebrates that will migrate to the reef as adults [1, 2].
53 Additionally, mangrove prop roots support diverse communities of sessile epibionts, some of
54 which can co-occur in nearby reef habitats [2]. For example, at seven Caribbean localities, coral
55 reefs and nearby mangrove ecosystems were found to support overlapping but distinctive
56 assemblages of sponges, implying that some sponge species can disperse between reef and
57 mangrove [3], representing yet another mechanism whereby mangroves impact the biodiversity
58 of nearby coral reefs.
59 To date, the abundance and distribution of scleractinians in mangroves has received
60 relatively little study [4], but based on recent published reports from the U.S. Virgin Islands [5-7]
61 and Cuba [8], there is emerging evidence to suggest that mangroves could represent a significant
62 habitat for corals. Rogers reported 28 coral species growing on or among mangrove prop roots in
63 Hurricane Hole, St. John (Table 1) [5]. A follow-up study quantified the abundance of two reef-
64 building corals — Colpophyllia natans and Diploria labrynthiformis — revealing that some
65 specimens in the mangroves survived an outbreak of disease and bleaching that caused high
66 mortality in nearby reef habitats [6]. Based on this finding, the authors suggested that mangroves
67 may provide a refuge from conditions that promote bleaching on the reef because of differences
68 in key environmental parameters e.g., shading from mangrove trees [7]. Alternatively, corals
69 could become locally adapted to conditions in the mangroves. As poorly flushed mangrove
70 habitats tend to experience higher temperatures than nearby reefs, mangroves could harbor
71 populations of heat tolerant individuals whose larvae could replenish nearby reefs following
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
72 heat-related coral mortality [7]. More recently, Hernández-Fernández reported 11 species of
73 hermatypic corals living on mangrove roots at Jardines de la Reina National Park in Cuba, all
74 inhabiting roots that were also occupied by crustose coralline algae [8].
75 To evaluate the potential importance of mangroves as a habitat for corals, we conducted a
76 systematic survey for corals on the prop roots of Rhizophora mangle at Calabash Caye, Turneffe
77 Atoll, Belize. Here, we present data on the abundance, distribution, size, colony morphology, and
78 year-to-year survival of corals along 1858 meters of mangrove prop roots fringing both banks of
79 a high-flow channel, a moderate-flow creek, and a low-flow mangrove pond. In all, we found
80 127 coral colonies occupying mangrove roots at Calabash, all branching members of the genus
81 Porites. Their distribution was highly clustered, with 108 colonies located in a single 178-meter
82 stretch of shoreline. An incipient longitudinal study of 60 randomly sampled mangrove roots at
83 Calabash revealed that roots bearing corals are relatively rare, but that corals inhabiting
84 mangrove roots exhibit a high survival rate over a year’s time. Given that the coral fauna we
85 characterized at Calabash was substantially less diverse than that reported in the U.S. Virgin
86 Islands and Cuba, we also investigated coral species richness at Crooked Creek, a high flow
87 environment along the western edge of Turneffe Atoll—there, we found representatives of eight
88 scleractinian genera, in contrast to the single genus we found at Calabash. We discuss the
89 implications of these findings for the importance of mangroves as a coral habitat in Turneffe
90 Atoll, and for the hypothesis that mangroves may represent a refuge for reef corals suffering
91 from the impacts of climate change.
92
93 Methods
94 Study sites
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
95 In November and December of 2013 and 2014, we surveyed the mangrove roots fringing three
96 contiguous bodies of water at Calabash Caye, a small mangrove on the eastern (windward) face
97 of Turneffe Atoll (Fig. 1). From north to south, these sites were: (1) a mangrove pond in the
98 interior of Little Calabash (17°17'18.87"N, 87°48'43.46"W); (2) the channel separating Little
99 Calabash from Calabash Caye (17°17'12.88"N, 87°48'41.86"W); and (3) a narrow creek
100 connecting the channel with a mangrove pond in the interior of Calabash (17°17'10.50"N,
101 87°48'44.94"W). These three sites—henceforth referred to as (1) Seahorse Pond, (2) Calabash
102 Channel, and (3) Calabash Creek— differed qualitatively with respect to current judged by in-
103 water observers: the pond exhibited the lowest current, the channel exhibited the highest current,
104 and the creek exhibited an intermediate current. At all three sites, the banks were continuously
105 lined with prop roots of Rhizophora mangle, and the roots located furthest from the bank were
106 densely occupied by a diverse epibiont community including macroalgae, sponges, tunicates,
107 bivalves, anemones, and corals. From November 16-December 15, 2014, nine data loggers
108 (HOBO Pendant® model 8K) were deployed to record hourly measurements of water
109 temperature at seven locations along the survey site (Fig. 1B, a-g). We also performed visual
110 surveys for corals on mangrove prop roots at Crooked Creek (17°19'45.00"N, 87°55'4.10"W), for
111 comparison with the mangroves at Calabash (Fig. 1C). Crooked Creek is a high-flow channel on
112 the western edge of Turneffe Atoll located approximately 12 km WNW of Calabash. The
113 research was conducted under Aquatic Scientific Research Permit 000047-13 issued by the
114 Belize Fisheries Department and signed by Fisheries Officer James Azueta.
115
116 Targeted coral surveys
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
117 In November of 2014, along three discontinuous sections of shoreline at Calabash Caye spanning
118 1858 meters (Fig. 1; red lines), the mangroves were systematically inspected for the presence of
119 corals by three observers who slowly snorkeled in sequence past the fringing prop roots. Each
120 root that harbored at least one coral was marked above the waterline using colored zip ties, and
121 its location was determined using a handheld GPS device (Garmin; GPSmap 76CSx). Every
122 coral colony was photographed from above and from one side using an underwater digital
123 camera (Pentax WG-10). In each photograph, a centimeter rule was held in approximately the
124 same plane as the center of the coral, so that each colony’s dimensions could be estimated from
125 the photographs.
126
127 Transect-based sampling of mangrove roots
128 In November 2013, we established six 30m transects along the shorelines of Calabash Channel
129 and Calabash Creek (Fig. 1B; 1-6). On each transect, a unique combination of colored zip ties
130 was used to mark ten mangrove prop roots at regular intervals (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27 and
131 30 m from the start of the transect). Video and still photography were used to record the
132 macroscopic epibionts inhabiting each of these 60 marked roots. The same 60 roots were
133 photographically re-sampled in November 2014. The still photos and videos were analyzed by
134 five independent observers to identify corals living on the roots.
135
136 Species identification
137 Corals were identified based on gross colony morphology by observers on site and from
138 photographs. In the case of the branching Porites, which proved to be the only type of coral we
139 observed at Calabash, we did not attempt to identify individual colonies to species. Caribbean
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
140 branching Porites are thought to compose a monophyletic group, but the number of species
141 constituting the complex is unclear. A recent molecular phylogenetic analysis of this clade based
142 on the mitochondrial control region and 10 nuclear loci failed to resolve the three nominal
143 species: P. divaricata, P. furcata, and P. porites [9]. Given this uncertainty, we refer to all of
144 these specimens as branching Porites, to differentiate them from sympatric crustose/massive
145 congeners such as P. astreoides.
146
147 Characterization of colony size and morphology
148 The length, width, and height of each branching Porites found at Calabash Caye were measured
149 on site. From these linear dimensions, the ecological volume of each colony was calculated
150 according to the formula of Shaish et al. [10]. Branch tips were counted from photographs aided
151 by ImageJ [11]. Branch density was then calculated by dividing the number of branch tips by the
152 ecological volume.
153
154 Analysis of spatial distribution
155 Distances between corals were estimated from GPS coordinates. Using the estimated distances
156 between colonies within each contiguous stretch of shoreline, we applied the Clark-Evans test
157 [12] modified for dispersion along one dimension [13] to determine if the average distance
158 between nearest neighbors differed from null expectations.
159
160 Results
161 Number and distribution of corals at Calabash Caye
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
162 Representative photographs of coral colonies on red mangrove prop roots at Calabash Caye are
163 shown in Fig. 2. In all, 127 coral colonies were identified along the 1858 meters of shoreline
164 surveyed at Calabash Caye (Fig. 3). All of the corals identified appeared to be branching
165 members of the genus Porites. However, twenty (15.7%) of the colonies were recent recruits that
166 did not yet have any branches.
167 The corals exhibited a highly clustered distribution, with 85% (108/127) of the Porites
168 colonies occurring on 26 prop roots in a 178-meter stretch along the north side of Calabash
169 Channel (Fig. 3A, B). Single colonies were found on 9 of these roots, but multiple colonies were
170 found on the other 17 roots, with as many as 18 colonies on a single root (Fig. 3B). Along the
171 eastern edge of Calabash Creek and the southern side of Calabash Channel (Fig. 3A; blue line),
172 corals were identified on 11 prop roots. Most of these roots bore a single coral, but three colonies
173 were found on one root and five on another (Fig. 3C). Only two coral-bearing roots were found
174 on the western edge of Calabash Creek (Fig. 3A; green line), each with only 1 colony per root.
175 No corals were found along the 821 m of shoreline surveyed within Seahorse Pond. According to
176 the Clark-Evans test, the corals along the 1110 m shoreline encompassing Seahorse Pond and the
177 north side of Calabash Channel were more tightly clustered than would be expected by chance
178 (p<0.001; Table 2), while those located along the 550 m shoreline encompassing the south side
179 of Calabash channel and the eastern edge of Calabash Creek were not (p=0.184).
180 We determined the size of the colonies using two metrics: the number of branch tips and
181 the ecological volume [10]. The number of branch tips ranged from zero to 120 (mean = 9.9),
182 with more than half of all corals having ≤3 branch tips (Fig. 4A). The ecological volume ranged
183 from 0.25 to 8008 cm3 (mean = 366.3; Fig. 4B). The two parameters were positively correlated
184 (r2=0.39; p<0.0001; Fig. 4C), but the number of branch tips varied substantially among colonies
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
185 at higher ecological volumes. For example, the colony in Fig. 4D occupies about 73% of the
186 ecological volume of the colony in Figure 4E (960 vs. 1320 cm3), but it has over 8x as many
187 branch tips (65 vs. 8).
188 To examine the distribution of Porites colonies by size, we divided all corals into four
189 size categories based on branch number (0; 1-10; 11-40; >40) and four categories based on
190 ecological volume (1-10; 10-100; 100-1000; 1000-10000 cm3; Fig. 5). Regardless of whether
191 colonies were categorized according to branch number or ecological volume, the categories were
192 not distributed equally among shoreline regions (for branch number: (6) = 40.05, p<0.005; for
193 ecological volume: (6) = 25.49, p<0.005). Nearly all of the colonies lacking branches (19/20)
194 were found in the western section of the north shore of Calabash channel (Fig. 5A, B). By
195 contrast, nearly all of the colonies with >40 branches (4/5) were found in the stretch of shoreline
196 encompassing the eastern bank of the creek and the southern bank of the channel (Fig. 5A, C).
197 In addition to our targeted search for corals living on mangrove roots, we undertook a
198 longitudinal, transect-based survey of mangrove roots at Calabash, which would allow us to
199 estimate the frequency of mangrove roots bearing corals along stretches of shoreline where
200 corals were observed. Of the 60 roots we surveyed in both 2013 and 2014 (labeled 1-6 in Fig.
201 1B), 57 did not bear any corals in either 2013 or 2014; the roots lacking corals included 20 of 20
202 roots sampled along the east bank of Calabash Creek, 20 of 20 along the south shore of Calabash
203 Channel, and 17 of 20 (85%) along the north shore of Calabash Channel. In both 2013 and 2014,
204 one root along the north shore of Calabash Channel was found to harbor a single coral colony
205 (Fig. 6A, B), while a second root was found to harbor 4 coral colonies (Fig. 6C-E). In our 2013
206 survey, we identified a single unbranched colony on root 2-7. This colony cannot be seen in the
207 images recorded in 2014.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
208 Given their comparable locations on the same mangrove roots, we conclude the colonies
209 found in 2013 are the same colonies identified in 2014 (Fig. 6), and therefore, it is possible to
210 make inferences about change in colony shape and size in the intervening year. Among the five
211 corals we can compare between years, there are colonies that appear to have lost branches and
212 colonies that appear to have gained branches. In the single coral located on root 1-9 (the ninth
213 root sampled on transect one) a substantial section of the colony appears to have been lost
214 between 2013 and 2014 (see dashed line in Fig. 6A). By contrast, coral 1 on root 2-3 appears to
215 have erupted new branches near its point of attachment with the mangrove root (compare dashed
216 circles in Fig 6C and 6E).
217
218 Species diversity of corals at Crooked Creek
219 To determine whether the coral diversity on mangroves at Calabash Caye was representative of
220 Turneffe Atoll, we surveyed the mangroves lining Crooked Creek, a high-flow channel on the
221 western edge of Turneffe Atoll (Fig. 1C). In sharp contrast to Calabash Caye, at Crooked Creek,
222 we were able to tentatively identify nine coral species in addition to branching Porites (Table 1).
223 These included Porites astreoides, Dichocoenia stokesii, Orbicella faveolata and Siderastrea
224 siderea (Fig. 7). Fire coral (Millepora alcicornis), a member of the cnidarian class Hydrozoa,
225 was also abundant at Crooked Creek (Fig. 7) but absent from the mangroves we surveyed at
226 Calabash.
227228 Discussion
229 Mangroves are generally regarded as unsuitable habitat for scleractinians, and, as a result,
230 few studies have focused on the abundance and diversity of corals living on or among mangrove
231 prop roots [5, 7, 8]. There are a handful of references to corals occupying mangrove roots in
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
232 general studies on mangrove biodiversity [14-17]. For example, in their authoritative analysis of
233 mangrove epibionts at four cays off the coast of southern Belize, Farnsworth and Ellison
234 included two corals among the species list in the appendix (Porites astreoides and Diploria
235 strigosa), but they did not mention corals in the text [16]. In their biotic survey of the Pelican
236 Cays, McIntyre et al. reported corals inhabiting mangrove roots at five sites [4]. In one mangrove
237 pond, the prop roots supported a few colonies of Agaricia sp., while in another pond, a single
238 large colony of Siderastrea siderea was found inhabiting mangrove roots. In three other sites,
239 “corals” were listed among the members of the mangrove root community, but no species were
240 identified by name [4]. In a biotic survey of Twin Cays, also in southern Belize, Rützler and co-
241 workers reported corals occupying mangrove prop roots at three of 20 observation stations. The
242 species identified on mangrove roots were Diploria strigosa, Porites astreoides, and P. porites
243 [17].
244 In contrast to these general studies of mangrove biodiversity, recent studies in St. John and
245 Cuba have focused explicitly on corals. These studies have demonstrated that diverse coral
246 assemblages can thrive on and among mangroves [5-8], thus raising the question of how
247 important mangroves might be for particular coral species. Mangroves could prove critical to the
248 long term health of certain coral populations, perhaps especially during periods of extreme
249 environmental stress on nearby reef habitats [6, 7]. If this proves true, we may begin to regard
250 mangroves as part of the ecological niche for some coral species [18]. Alternatively, mangroves
251 may represent marginal habitat for corals with little impact on regional abundance or species’
252 resilience, even for those species that occur in mangroves regularly.
253 Understanding the importance of mangroves as coral habitat will require studies on coral
254 abundance and diversity from many more sites. Given the existing data (Table 1), it appears that
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
255 corals are widespread on mangroves, but mangrove coral assemblages can differ substantially
256 between sites. At Calabash Caye, all of the corals we identified were branching Porites,
257 representing at most two nominal species (P. divaricata and P. furcata), making it the least
258 diverse mangrove coral fauna so far described. The most diverse site described to date, Hurricane
259 Hole, boasts 34-36 distinct species (depending upon whether P. divaricata, furcata, and porites
260 prove to be valid species)[7]. Of note, the published studies from Hurricane Hole do not specify
261 in every instance whether a particular species was found attached directly to mangrove prop
262 roots, on the peat shelf immediately below mangrove prop roots, or on some other substratum in
263 one of the mangrove lined bays and creeks that were studied [7]. This distinction is potentially
264 important when identifying suitable habitat for a given species. Intermediate levels of coral
265 diversity were observed at five sites in Cuba (4-9 species; [5, 7]) and at Crooked Creek, where
266 we observed 10-12 different species (depending upon resolution of the branching Porites).
267 Branching Porites have been reported at every mangrove site where corals have been
268 systematically surveyed (Table 1), which suggests that this may among those corals most tolerant
269 of the mangrove forest environment.
270 With existing data we cannot ascertain definitively why some mangrove sites have high
271 coral diversity, some sites have low coral diversity, and some sites are lacking corals entirely.
272 The biodiversity of mangrove epibiont communities is driven by a combination of processes
273 operating at different scales [16]. Key environmental parameters such as light, flow, and the
274 abundance of predators can vary substantially between adjacent prop roots and even within a
275 single root.
276 However, based on this study and previous studies on mangrove epibiont communities, it
277 appears that flow is likely to be a major determinant of a mangrove site’s suitability for corals.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
278 While a detailed analysis of water flow was beyond the scope of our study, we observed a
279 qualitative difference in the current between Seahorse Pond, where we found no corals, and
280 Calabash Channel, where we found 85% of the corals identified in our study. Within Seahorse
281 Pond, there was no perceptible current, at least none sufficient to displace a snorkeler or a small
282 buoy. The stillness of the water was further evidenced by a nearly ubiquitous layer of fine
283 sediment covering the sessile epibionts on the mangrove roots, a layer that was easily dislodged
284 by the current from a passing snorkeler. By contrast, in the channel, snorkelers had to actively
285 swim against the current to maintain their positions relative to the bank, and the sessile epibionts
286 inhabiting the mangrove roots were not covered in sediment. Other recent studies on low flow
287 mangrove sites are consistent with the absence of corals in the low-flow Seahorse Pond. Ruiz et
288 al. characterized more than 59,000 macroinvertebrate epibionts inhabiting prop roots in a low-
289 flow coastal mangrove pond in Mexico, and did not report a single coral specimen [19], and
290 Yates et al. reported finding no corals in the most interior portion of three embayments at
291 Hurricane Hole [7].
292 Another factor that we suspect is impacting coral diversity in the mangroves is the fine-
293 scale topography of the shoreline. Along the northern bank of Calabash Channel where we
294 observed many branching Porites but no other species, there was a pronounced undercut in the
295 peat bank, and the overhanging prop roots effectively shaded a habitat of mixed peat bank. By
296 contrast, at Crooked Creek, the coral-bearing areas were characterized by a shallow, well-lit peat
297 bank and carbonate platform that was occupied by numerous coral colonies, some of which
298 extended from the bank to the prop roots (Fig. 7A, F). This microhabitat is similar to that
299 depicted in the photographs of mangrove corals in St. John [5, 7] and Cuba [8]. We suspect that
300 the broad, shallow, well-lit shelf observed at these sites can support a more diverse coral
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
301 assemblage by providing a larger settlement area for corals and by allowing some species to
302 colonize the mangrove fringe that might not be well suited to settle and/or grow to substantial
303 size directly on the prop roots themselves.
304 To understand the importance of mangrove populations for the regional abundance of
305 corals—and whether mangroves might serve as refuges during periods of environmental stress—
306 we will require data on the growth, health, reproductive output, and temporal variability of coral
307 populations living in mangroves, as well as their relationship to populations in nearby reef
308 habitats. The current study begins to address these needs by obtaining baseline data on the size
309 and location of individual mangrove corals. By identifying a range of colony sizes, and
310 documenting the persistence of individual colonies from year-to-year, we have shown that
311 branching Porites can settle, survive, grow, and presumably reproduce in the channel and creek
312 habitats at Calabash Caye. We are in the process of acquiring additional longitudinal data (1) to
313 track the growth and survival of individual corals, (2) to determine how these life history traits
314 might be impacted by microhabitat, (3) to determine how this population fluctuates over time, (4)
315 to determine whether it is self-sustaining or requires constant immigration from adjacent “core”
316 habitats, and (5) to determine whether this site may export larvae to nearby reef and seagrass
317 habitats.
318 Branching Porites appear particularly adept at colonizing mangroves, and we suspect that
319 phenotypic plasticity is critical to their ability to tolerate a range of environments, from high
320 irradiance sites in shallow reefs, to shaded locations in the mangroves. The colony form of
321 branching corals has been shown to be strongly impacted by features of the physical
322 environment, particularly water flow and irradiance [20]. It is therefore noteworthy that our
323 study has detected substantial variation in colony form among branching Porites in the
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
324 mangroves at Calabash, namely a 10-fold difference in the number of branch tips found in corals
325 at a similar ecological volume. At this time, we lack the data necessary to determine the relative
326 contributions of fixed genetic differences and phenotypic plasticity to the range of colony forms
327 we observed. To address this question, we are currently working to determine the genetic
328 relatedness and characterize the microhabitat of colonies exhibiting alternative morphologies.
329 We are also monitoring the development of recent recruits to document their growth patterns,
330 and how growth relates to microhabitat. Finally, we are conducting reciprocal transplants to
331 directly test the capacity for phenotypic plasticity.
332 Going forward, we hope that this study will contribute to our understanding of the
333 importance of mangrove habitats for coral resilience. Future studies will be required to determine
334 if the utilization of mangroves by corals is predictable and deterministic or stochastic. If we
335 discover that mangrove populations make important contributions to the long-term survival of
336 some coral species, and that the type of mangrove habitat utilized by these corals is predictable,
337 this information could prove vitally important to marine resource managers in the design of
338 marine protected areas.
339
340 Acknowledgments
341 This research was conducted by students and faculty participating in the Marine Semester
342 offered by the Boston University Marine Program (BUMP) and Biology Department. The
343 research was conducted at the Calabash Caye Field Station (CCFS), Environmental Research
344 Institute, University of Belize. We are grateful to the staff of BUMP (D. Brown, J. Hammer-
345 Mendez, J. Perry, and J. Scace), the staff of CCFS (M. Alamina, V. Alamina, A. Cherrington, N.
346 Craig, C. Encalada, J. Hall, J. Morey) and colleagues from UB (L. Cho-Ricketts, E. Garcia) for
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
347 their technical expertise and logistical support. We are grateful to J. Azueta and I. Majil at the
348 Belize Fisheries Department for assistance in obtaining research permits. We thank J. Lang for
349 assistance in identifying corals. EAR was supported by a summer research fellowship from the
350 Undergraduate Research Opportunities Program at Boston University.
351
352
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
353 References
354 1. Martin TSH, Olds AD, Pitt KA, Johnston AB, Butler IR, Maxwell PS, et al. Effective protection 355 of fish on inshore coral reefs depends on the scale of mangrove-reef connectivity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 356 2015;527:157-65.357 2. Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, Green P, Haywood M, Kirton LG, et al. The habitat 358 function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquat Bot. 2008;89:155-85.359 3. Diaz MC. Mangrove and coral reef sponge faunas: untold stories about shallow water Porifera in 360 the Caribbean. Hydrobiologia. 2012;687:179-90.361 4. Macintyre IG, Goodbody I, Rützler K, Littler DS, Littler MM. A general biological and 362 geological survey of the rims of ponds in the major mangrove islands of the Pelican Cays, Belize. Atoll 363 Res Bull. 2000;467:13-44.364 5. Rogers CS. High diversity and abundance of scleractinian corals growing on and near mangrove 365 prop roots, St. John, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs. 2009;28:909.366 6. Rogers CS, Herlan JJ, editors. Life on the edge: corals in mangroves and climate change. 12th 367 International Coral Reef Symposium; 2012; Cairns, Australia.368 7. Yates KK, Rogers CS, Herlan JJ, Brooks GR, Smiley NA, Larson RA. Diverse coral 369 communities in mangrove habitats suggest a novel refuge from climate change. Biogeosciences. 370 2014;11:4321-37.371 8. Hernández-Fernández. Stony corals on submerged mangrove roots of Rhizophora mangle L. in 372 Jardines de la Reina National Park, Cuba. unknown. 2015:in press.373 9. Prada C, DeBiasse MB, Neigel JE, Yednock B, Stake JL, Forsman ZH, et al. Genetic species 374 delineation among branching Caribbean Porites corals. Coral Reefs. 2014;33:1019-30.375 10. Shaish L, Abelson A, Rinkevich B. Branch to colony trajectory in a modular organism: pattern 376 formation in the Indo-Pacific coral Stylophora pistillata. Developmental dynamics : an official 377 publication of the American Association of Anatomists. 2006;235:2111-21.378 11. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat 379 Methods. 2012;9:671-5.380 12. Clark PJ, Evans FC. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in 381 populations. Ecology. 1954;35:445-53.382 13. Clark PJ, Evans FC. Generalization of a nearest neighbor measure of dispersion for use in k-383 dimensions. Ecology. 1979;60:316-7.384 14. Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, Green P, Haywood M, Kirton LG, et al. The habitat 385 function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: A review. Aquat Bot. 2008;89:155-85.386 15. Kathiresan K, Bingham B. Biology of mangroves and mangrove ecosystems. Adv Mar Biol. 387 2001;40:81–251.388 16. Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM. Scale-dependent spatial and temporal variability in biogeography of 389 mangrove root epibiont communities. Ecol Monogr. 1996;66:45-66.390 17. Rützler K, Goodbody I, Diaz MC, Feller IC, Macintyre IG. The aquatic environment of Twin 391 Cays, Belize. Atoll Res Bull. 2004;512.392 18. Kawecki TJ. Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 2008;39:321-42.393 19. Ruiz M, López-Portillo J. Variación espacio-temporal de la comunidad de macroinvertebrados 394 epibiontes en las raíces del mangle rojo Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae) en la laguna costera de La 395 Mancha, Veracruz, México. Int J Trop Biol. 2014;62:1309-30.396 20. Todd PA. Morphological plasticity in scleractinian corals. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 397 2008;83:315-37.
398
399
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
Table 1(on next page)
Species diversity of corals in mangrove habitats of the Caribbean
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
Table 1. Species diversity of corals in mangrove habitats of the Caribbean Species HH BS LA M-n M-s Ni Ca CC TC
Acropora palmata X Agaricia agaricites X X X X Agaricia sp. X X X X Cladocora arbuscula X Colpophyllia amaranthus X Colpophyllia natans X Dendrogyra cylindrus X Dichocoenia stokesii X X X X X X Diploria labyrinthiformis X Eusmilia fastigiata X Favia fragum X X X X X Madracis auretenra X Manicina areolata X X Meandrina meandrites X Milleopora alcicornis X X X X Montastrea cavernosa X Mycetophillia species X X Oculina diffusa X Orbicella annularis X Orbicella faveolata1 X X Orbicella franksi X Phyllangia americana X Porites astreoides, X X X X X X X X Porites, branching P. divaricata X X X X X X X X P. furcata X X X X X P. porites X X X X X X Porites colonensis X Pseudodiploria clivosa X Pseudodiploria strigosa X X Scolymia cubensis X Scolymia lacera X Siderastrea radians X X Siderastrea siderea X X Solenastrea bournoni X Stephanocoenia intersepta X Stephanocoenia species X Tubastrea aurea X Tubastrea coccinea X TOTAL SPECIES2 34-36 5 4-5 6-7 7-9 6-7 1-2 10-12 3 1referred to as Montastrea faveolata; 2a range is given depending on whether branching Porites are counted as one species or multiple species; 3not all corals found on mangrove roots in this study were identified by species. US Virgin Islands [5]: HH=Hurricane Hole; Cuba [8]: BS=Boca Stone; LA=Las Auras, M-n=Mariflores north, M-s=Mariflores south, Ni=Nicola; Belize: TC=Twin Cays [4]; Ca=Calabash Caye [the current study]; CC=Crooked Creek [the current study].
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
Table 2(on next page)
Clark-Evans analysis of dispersion
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
Table 2. Clark-Evans analysis of dispersion
Shoreline Corals Span RA RE RA/RE σRE C p N. Channel1 108 1100m 1.66 m 5.09 m 0.33 0.49 6.99 <0.001 S. Channel2 14 550m 10.00 m 16.18 m 0.62 3.92 1.57 0.116
1includes Seahorse pond; 2includes eastern shore of Calabash Creek; RA = actual mean nearest-neighbor distance; RE = expected mean nearest-neighbor distance; σRE = the standard error of the mean distance to nearest neighbor in a randomly distributed population with a known density; c= the standard variate of the normal curve
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
1Overhead view of study sites
(A) The locations of mangrove roots that were inspected for the presence of corals are shown
for (B) Calabash Caye and (C) Crooked Creek. At Calabash Caye, the survey area was divided
between three discontinuous stretches of mangrove: (1) the shoreline of Seahorse Pond
which is contiguous with the northern shoreline of Calabash Channel; (2) the eastern edge of
Calabash Creek which is contiguous with the southern shore of Calabash Channel; (3) the
western edge of Calabash Creek. In panel B, the white diamonds labeled a-g indicate the
approximate locations of temperature loggers, and the white lines labeled 1-6 indicate the
approximate locations of 30m transects. In panel C, the red lines indicate the shoreline that
was surveyed for corals.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
2Representative photographs of Porites inhabiting prop roots
The images depict a specimen that has not yet developed any branches (A) as well as larger
colonies with eight (B) or more than 20 (C) branches. A 5-cm scale bar is shown in each
photograph.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
3Plot of coral locations
(A) Along three stretches of shoreline (yellow, blue, and green lines), we identified 40 prop
roots bearing corals (circles). (B-D) The graphs indicated the number of corals found at each
point along the three transects.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
4Coral dimensions
(A) Number of corals with a given number of branches. (B) Number of corals with a given
ecological volume. (C) Linear regression of branch number versus ecological volume.
Photographs of two of the individual corals represented in this plot (red circles) are shown (D-
E).
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
5Geographic distribution of coral size classes at Calabash
(A) All corals along three stretches of shoreline (B-D) were placed into one of four size
categories based upon the number of branch tips and one of four size categories based upon
ecological volume. The pie charts indicate the proportion (and number) of corals in each size
category for branch tips and for ecological volume for each stretch of shoreline. The same
color scheme is used as in Fig. 3.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
6Visual comparison of the same coral colonies in 2013 and 2014
The single coral observed on mangrove root 1-9 is shown in 2013 (A) and 2014 (B). The
corresponding sections of the coral colony are given the same number in each panel (1-3).
The arrow indicates what appears to be the identical sponge species in the same location
relative to the colony in both photographs. The dashed line in (A) indicates a region of the
colony that was lost between 2014 and 2014 (B). The five corals observed on root 2-3 are
shown for both 2013 (C, D) and 2014 (E). The presumed correspondence between colonies,
based on their relative locations along the root, is indicated by the numbering (1-5). The
dashed circles on colony 1 in 2013 (C) indicate protuberances near the base of the colony
that appear to be located in the same relative positions as the bases of two erupting
branches in 2014 (E). The asterisks (C, D) indicate branches that have experienced breakage.
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015
7Coral diversity at Crooked Creek
Representative photos of corals observed at Crooked Creek. (A) PA: Porites astreiodes; (B)
bP: branching Porites; DS: Dichocoenia stokesii; (C) PA: Porites astreiodes; (D) OF: Orbicella
faveolata; SS: Siderastrea siderea; (E) MA: Milleopora alcicornis (a hydrozoan); (F) DS:
Dichocoenia stokesii;
PeerJ PrePrints | https://dx.doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.1453v1 | CC-BY 4.0 Open Access | rec: 27 Oct 2015, publ: 27 Oct 2015