Date post: | 20-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 229 times |
Download: | 6 times |
Corporate Finance
Introduction to riskProf. André FarberSOLVAY BUSINESS SCHOOLUNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |2
Introduction to risk
• Objectives for this session :– 1. Review the problem of the opportunity cost of capital
– 2. Analyze return statistics
– 3. Introduce the variance or standard deviation as a measure of risk for a portfolio
– 4. See how to calculate the discount rate for a project with risk equal to that of the market
– 5. Give a preview of the implications of diversification
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |3
Setting the discount rate for a risky project
• Stockholders have a choice:– either they invest in real investment projects of companies
– or they invest in financial assets (securities) traded on the capital market
• The cost of capital is the opportunity cost of investing in real assets
• It is defined as the forgone expected return on the capital market with the same risk as the investment in a real asset
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |4
Three key ideas
• 1. Returns are normally distributed random variables Markowitz 1952: portfolio theory, diversification
• 2. Efficient market hypothesis Movements of stock prices are random Kendall 1953
• 3. Capital Asset Pricing Model Sharpe 1964 Lintner 1965 Expected returns are function of systematic risk
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |5
Preview of what follow
• First, we will analyze past markets returns.
• We will:– compare average returns on common stocks and Treasury bills
– define the variance (or standard deviation) as a measure of the risk of a portfolio of common stocks
– obtain an estimate of the historical risk premium (the excess return earned by investing in a risky asset as opposed to a risk-free asset)
• The discount rate to be used for a project with risk equal to that of the market will then be calculated as the expected return on the market:
Expected return on the market
Current risk-free rate
Historical risk premium
= +
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |6
Implications of diversification
• The next step will be to understand the implications of diversification.
• We will show that:– diversification enables an investor to eliminate part of the risk of a stock held
individually (the unsystematic - or idiosyncratic risk).
– only the remaining risk (the systematic risk) has to be compensated by a higher expected return
– the systematic risk of a security is measured by its beta (), a measure of the sensitivity of the actual return of a stock or a portfolio to the unanticipated return in the market portfolio
– the expected return on a security should be positively related to the security's beta
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |7
Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
• Risk – expected return relationship:
jFMFj RRRR )(Expected
returnRisk-free interest
rate
Market risk
premium
Risk
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |8
Returns
• The primitive objects that we will manipulate are percentage returns over a period of time:
• The rate of return is a return per dollar (or £, DEM,...) invested in the asset, composed of– a dividend yield
– a capital gain
• The period could be of any length: one day, one month, one quarter, one year.
• In what follow, we will consider yearly returns
1
1
1
t
tt
t
tt P
PP
P
divR
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |9
Ex post and ex ante returns
• Ex post returns are calculated using realized prices and dividends
• Ex ante, returns are random variables– several values are possible
– each having a given probability of occurence
• The frequency distribution of past returns gives some indications on the probability distribution of future returns
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |10
Frequency distribution
• Suppose that we observe the following frequency distribution for past annual returns over 50 years. Assuming a stable probability distribution, past relative frequencies are estimates of probabilities of future possible returns .
Realized Return Absolutefrequency
Relativefrequency
-20% 2 4%
-10% 5 10%
0% 8 16%
+10% 20 40%
+20% 10 20%
+30% 5 10%
50 100%
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |11
Mean/expected return
• Arithmetic Average (mean)– The average of the holding period returns for the individual years
• Expected return on asset A:– A weighted average return : each possible return is multiplied or weighted by the
probability of its occurence. Then, these products are summed to get the expected return.
N
RRRRMean N
...21
1...
return ofy probabilit with
...)(
21
2211
n
ii
nn
ppp
Rp
RpRpRpRE
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |12
Variance -Standard deviation
• Measures of variability (dispersion)
• Variance
• Ex post: average of the squared deviations from the mean
• Ex ante: the variance is calculated by multiplying each squared deviation from the expected return by the probability of occurrence and summing the products
• Unit of measurement : squared deviation units. Clumsy..
• Standard deviation : The square root of the variance
• Unit :return
VarR R R R R R
TT
2 12
22 2
1( ) ( ) ... ( )
Var R Expected RA A A( ) ) 2 2 val ue of (RA
Var R p R R p R R p R RA A A A A A N A N A( ) ( ) ( ) ... ( ), , , 21 1
22 2
2 2
SD R Var RA A A( ) ( )
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |13
Return Statistics - Example
Return Proba Squared Dev-20% 4% 0.08526-10% 10% 0.03686
0% 16% 0.0084610% 40% 0.0000620% 20% 0.0116630% 10% 0.04326
Exp.Return 9.20%Variance 0.01514Standard deviation 12.30%
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |14
Normal distribution
• Realized returns can take many, many different values (in fact, any real number > -100%)
• Specifying the probability distribution by listing:– all possible values– with associated probabilities
• as we did before wouldn't be simple.
• We will, instead, rely on a theoretical distribution function (the Normal distribution) that is widely used in many applications.
• The frequency distribution for a normal distribution is a bellshaped curve.
• It is a symetric distribution entirely defined by two parameters
• – the expected value (mean)
• – the standard deviation
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |15
Belgium - Monthly returns 1951 - 1999Bourse de Bruxelles 1951-1999
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
120.00
140.00
160.00
180.00
-20.
00
-18.
00
-16.
00
-14.
00
-12.
00
-10.
00
-8.0
0
-6.0
0
-4.0
0
-2.0
0 0.
00
2.00
4.
00
6.00
8.
00
10.0
0
12.0
0
14.0
0
16.0
0
18.0
0
20.0
0
22.0
0
24.0
0
26.0
0
28.0
0
30.0
0
Rentabilité mensuelle
Fré
qu
en
ce
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |16
Normal distribution illustrated
Normal distribution
0.0000
0.0050
0.0100
0.0150
0.0200
0.0250
68.26%
95.44%
Standard deviation from mean
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |17
Risk premium on a risky asset
• The excess return earned by investing in a risky asset as opposed to a risk-free asset
•
• U.S.Treasury bills, which are a short-term, default-free asset, will be used a the proxy for a risk-free asset.
• The ex post (after the fact) or realized risk premium is calculated by substracting the average risk-free return from the average risk return.
• Risk-free return = return on 1-year Treasury bills
• Risk premium = Average excess return on a risky asset
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |18
Total returns US 1926-1999
Arithmetic Mean
Standard Deviation
Risk Premium
Common Stocks 13.3% 20.1% 9.5%
Small Company Stocks 17.6 33.6 13.8
Long-term Corporate Bonds
5.9 8.7 2.1
Long-term government bonds
5.5 9.3 1.7
Intermediate-term government bond
5.4 5.8 1.6
U.S. Treasury bills 3.8 3.2
Inflation 3.2 4.5
Source: Ross, Westerfield, Jaffee (2002) Table 9.2
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |19
Market Risk Premium: The Very Long Run
1802-1970 1871-1925
1926-1999
1802-1999
Common Stock 6.8 8.5 13.3 9.7
Treasury Bills 5.4 4.1 3.8 4.4
Risk premium 1.4 4.4 9.5 5.3
Source: Ross, Westerfield, Jaffee (2002) Table 9A.1
The equity premium puzzle:
Was the 20th century an anomaly?
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |20
Notions of Market Efficiency
• An Efficient market is one in which:– Arbitrage is disallowed: rules out free lunches
– Purchase or sale of a security at the prevailing market price is never a positive NPV transaction.
– Prices reveal information
• Three forms of Market Efficiency
• (a) Weak Form Efficiency Prices reflect all information in the past record of stock prices
• (b) Semi-strong Form Efficiency Prices reflect all publicly available information
• (c) Strong-form Efficiency Price reflect all information
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |21
Efficient markets: intuition
Expectation
Time
Price
Realization
Price change is unexpected
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |22
Weak Form Efficiency
• Random-walk model:– Pt -Pt-1 = Pt-1 * (Expected return) + Random error
– Expected value (Random error) = 0
– Random error of period t unrelated to random component of any past period
• Implication:– Expected value (Pt) = Pt-1 * (1 + Expected return)
– Technical analysis: useless
• Empirical evidence: serial correlation– Correlation coefficient between current return and some past return
– Serial correlation = Cor (Rt, Rt-s)
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |23
Random walk - illustration
Bourse de Bruxelles 1980-1999
-30.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
-30.00 -25.00 -20.00 -15.00 -10.00 -5.00 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00
Rentabilité mois t
Re
nta
bili
té m
ois
t+
1
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |24
Semi-strong Form Efficiency
• Prices reflect all publicly available information
• Empirical evidence: Event studies
• Test whether the release of information influences returns and when this influence takes place.
• Abnormal return AR : ARt = Rt - Rmt
• Cumulative abnormal return:
• CARt = ARt0 + ARt0+1 + ARt0+2 +... + ARt0+1
A.Farber Vietnam 2004 |25
Strong-form Efficiency
• How do professional portfolio managers perform?
• Jensen 1969: Mutual funds do not generate abnormal returns
• Rfund - Rf = + (RM - Rf)
• Insider trading
• Insiders do seem to generate abnormal returns
• (should cover their information acquisition activities)